Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2420226 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateMay 6, 1947
Filing dateNov 3, 1944
Priority dateNov 3, 1944
Publication numberUS 2420226 A, US 2420226A, US-A-2420226, US2420226 A, US2420226A
InventorsClaus Clyde R
Original AssigneeGates Rubber Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Oil well packer
US 2420226 A
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

May 6, 1947. c, R, CLAU'S 2,420,226 A OIL WELL PACKER Filed Nov. 3, 1944 I 1 M ,4' mm I3 13 b 4 \0 1% c 2 l8 n 2 'I: I

/A c Q A bl r '44 I4 '4 /2 NJMUEU. F l G. 5

INVENTOR;

CLYDE R.CLAU$ BY Patented May 6, 1947 OIL WELL PACKER Clyde R. Claus, Denver, 0010., assignor to Gates Rubber Company, Denver, 0010., a corporation of Colorado Application November 3, 1944, Serial No. 561,661

4 Claims.

This invention relates to improvements in oil well packers.

In effecting various tests of oil wells and deep water wells, it is necessary to seal oil a portion of the well and for this purpose devices usually referred to as packers are used; some of these are of such construction that they are expanded, by internal pressure, into contact with the inner surface of the well casing.

It is the object of this invention to produce a packer of the expansible type that shall possess several advantages over present constructions.

Among the objects sought are the following:

To produce a fabric reenforced packer in which the fabric plies are positioned in planes perpendicular to the axes of the packer, whereby maximum strength and longer life are obtained.

To reduce the adhesion which is a major cause of failure in the conventional type packer.

To produce a packer in which the expansion increases progressively from the ends towards the center whereby the danger of trapping mud between the packer and the casing is greatly reduced.

To produce a packer that can be built in segments or as a unit.

To produce a packer of such construction that any degree of flexibility or of rigidity can be obtained.

To produce a packer construction that can be varied so as to obtain any desired expansion for any given pressure and whereby strength can be built into those portions that are most liable to failure.

The above and other objects that may become apparent as this description proceeds are attained by means of a construction and an arrangement of parts that will now be described in detail and for this purpose reference will be had to the accompanying drawing in which the invention has been illustrated in its preferred form, and in which:

Figure l is a diametrical section through the improved packer;

Figure 2 is a side elevation with a portion thereof shown in section and illustrates a slightly modified form of construction;

Figure 3 is a side elevation showing the packer expanded into sealing position with a well casing;

Figure 4 is a section taken on line 4-4, Figure 1; and

Figure 5 is an end elevation.

The packer body consists of a tubular cylindrical member that has been designated by reference numeral It. The outside and the inside diameter, as well as the length, can be varied to suit various conditions. The body [0 is made principally from some suitable rubber composition and the rubber may be either a natural rubber or one of the several rubber-like synthetics, as well as any other material that might be found suitable and desirable.

The ends of the tubular member are closed by means of caps H and Ila that are secured in place by means of bolts 12 that have enlarged end portions 13 positioned within the walls of the tubular member as shown in Figure 1. The end closures are provided with two concentric cylindrical flanges I4 that overlap ends of the tubular member and are preferably positioned in rabbets provided in the inner and outer surfaces for their reception. Nuts l5 hold the end closures in place as shown in the drawing. The two end closures are duplicates with this exception that the one at the top, which has been designated by reference numeral II a, has a threaded opening for the reception of a pipe I6 through which some fluid, either air or liquid can be pumped into the interior of the tubular member for the purpose of expanding the latter. In order to give the tubular member the required strength and to reenforce it and in order to further control the manner in which it expands, suitable fabric rings l! are positioned in the rubber composition in concentric relation to the opening therein. These rings are preferably formed from rubberized woven fabric and are positioned with their planes perpendicular to the axis of the tubular member.

It will be observed from Figure 1 that at the ends of the tubular member the reenforcing rings H are much closer together than they are in the intermediate portion of the packer. The purpose of this close arrangement of the rings at the ends is to give the material there great strength and rigidity so that it will resist forces tending to move the end closures outwardly. Instead of fabric rings, it is permissible, and some times desirable, to employ woven metal fabric as reenforcing members at these points because between the flanges M the material cannot expand when the tubular member is subjected to internal pressure. Beginning at or about the upper ends of the enlargements 13, the reenforcing rings can be spaced farther apart, although no material expansion is to take place until a point at the innermost ends of enlargement I3 has been reached. It will be seen from the drawing that between the two lines designated by reference characters a and b the reenforcing rings are provided with openings somewhat larger than the opening in the tubular member. Beginning at point b and terminating at point e the openings in the rings are of still greater diameter and between the points c and c the rings have still greater openings. The corresponding groups of rings on the two sides of the middle plane are'of the same internal and external diameters as clearly illustrated in Figure 1. The result of this decrease in the width of the rings is that when "a fluid under pressure is introduced into the chamber at the center of the tubular member, that portion between lines and c will'expand more and at a faster rate than the 'two sections between 0 and b and between 0 and b and the sections between points a and b and a and b will expand at a lesser rate so that when the packer is expanded the greatest expansion will takeplace at the middle and therefore this part of the packer will contact the well casing l8 first, and as the pressure increases the zone of contact will widen. The result of this isthat any mud that is positioned between the casing and the outer surface of the packer will be squeezed upwardly and downwardly so as to produce a close contact between the'packer and the inner surface of the casing. This contact will offergreat resistance to relative movement than if alayer of mud'were positioned between the two surfaces. In the drawing no means has beenshown for supplying the fluid under pressure but it is to'be understood that a reservoir containing air or water under pressure or a pump is connected with the pipe l6 and that a suitable valve control mechanism is provided in the pipe connection. 'When the 'pa'cker'is to be released. the interior of 'pipe l6 is putin communication with the atmosphere or if a'li'quid is used, with a suitable container whereupon the fiuidwithin the packer-will escape due 'to'the contractile force of the packer body which tends to bring it back toits original shape. Afterthe pressure has thus'been reduoed and the diameter correspondingly reduced, the packer ean-be removed or merely moved to a different positibn. InfFigure '1 the reenforcing rings betweenthe -pbi nt s a nd. a have been shown "as equally "spaced, In Figure 2 the rings have been shown "as positioned in groups which are spaced short distances apart. The number of rings in'each 'jgroupcan be varied to suit the requirements of anyparticular case.

Due to the fact that the reenforcing rings are of fabric and thattheyare positioned inplanes perpendicularto theaxis of the-packer,=they-can expand and contract due to the-diagonal arrangein'ent of the threads at different parts of the ring. If the reenforcement were elfected by means of rubberi'zed fabric rolledconcentrica'lly around the "tubular member, the "expansion would be practically zero be'cause fabric cannot-expand in the direction of its warp or woof threads.

The arrangement of the rings in planes perpend;icular to the axis of the packer also has other "advantages. In the first place, by this construction the strength of the walls-can be arranged so :35 to prioduce a predetermined shape 'of the outer "surface due to the'expandingfluid. Another adyainrag is that the fabric positioned in this manjrier is f more eifective for resisting compressive strainsthan it it were concentric'with'theaxis.

fAfsti ll further advantage or "this -c'zonstruction is thatth 'packer body can be built insections. For example, those portions'betweenthe endsand planes a and a can be assembled with the end. closures and bolts before being attached to the remaining portions of the body. Those portions between planes a and b and a and b can be cut from a long tubular member that has the same size rings throughout its entire length. The portions between D and c and b and 0' can likewise be cut from along length of tubing having reenforcing rings of the particular size shown and the same is true with the center section between 0 and c. The several sections can be assembled while the material is in its uncured state and positioned in a mold where it is given thefrequ'ired heat treatment to efiect a welding of 'the 'adjacent ends of the several sections and a proper curing of the material.

With'this construction greater rigidity and flexibility can be obtained through variations of the fabric contents and the dimensions of the rings and it is therefore possible to design packers that expand'in a predetermined manner.

Another advantage is that strength canbe'built into the tubular body at the points where desirable. To h'ave the inside opening in each ring different from'that of the others so as to produce a gradual'variation in resistance. However, such a fine gradationis not believed to be necessary and has not been shown because it would greatly complicate the drawing.

-In'the above parts of the specification several advantages due to the positioning of the reenforcing rings have been pointed out. However, it is believed that'this construction has other advantages that may'become more apparent during theme of such packers. Any and all of these advantages are believed to be 'due to the fact that the ieenforcing rings are positioned in planes perpendicular to the'axis of the tubular body; and to the furtherfact that the reenforcements are so related to each other that the greatest expansion will take'pl'ace near the center and'diminishtowa'rdst'he ends. By increasing the amount of pressurein the interior of the tubular'bo'dy the width of the zone or contact can be varied in the manner above pointed out.

Due to the variation in the reenforcing'means the strains developed'adjacent the edges of the flanges I4 are reduced in intensity from what they would be if the reenforcing means were uniform throughout the entire length of the body.

Having described the invention what is claimed new is:

1. A well packer comprising a tubular cylindrical body-formed in part from rubber composition, end-closures therefor, one 'of which has an opening for'the admission 'of a'fiuid under ressure,*and reenforci'ng elements in the wall of the body, said elements comprising flat rings ofwoven fabric'of larger inside'di'ameters than the opening in the body, positioned in concentric'relation to the cylindrical body, th'e'rings'being spaced substantially uniformly throughout the length of the body, the width of the rings decreasing from the 'ends towards the center, whereby the body will expand at "a greater rateatthe middle'than at any other point in its length.

2. expansible element for use in a well packer, comprising 'a tubular cylindrical body 5 the body, per unit length of the latter, decreasing from the ends toward the center.

3. An expansible element for use in a well packer comprising a tubular cylindrical body of resilient elastic material, the Wall having incorporated therein a plurality of reenforcing rings of woven fabric positioned in substantially uniformly spaced relation, the planes of the rings being perpendicular to the axis of the body, the width of the rings decreasing from the ends towards the middle, whereby when the interior is subjected to a fluid pressure the middle can expand at a faster rate than portions nearer the ends.

4. A well packer comprising a tubular cylindrical body formed in part from rubber composition, end closures therefor, one of which has an opening for the admission of a fluid under pressure, and reenforcing elements in the wall of the tubular body, said elements comprising rings of woven cotton fabric of larger inside diameter than the opening in the body, positioned in substantially equidistantly spaced planes perpendicular to the axis of the body, and in concentric relation thereto, the density of the reenforcements being 6 greater at the ends than at any intermediate point whereby the body will expand at a faster rate adjacent the center than at any other point in its length.

CLYDE R. CLAUS.

REFERENCES CITED The following references are of record in the file of this patent:

UNITED STATES PATENTS

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US808775 *May 25, 1905Jan 2, 1906James OstranderPacking.
US1190790 *Apr 16, 1915Jul 11, 1916Fred Joseph MoserWell-packer.
US1642273 *Sep 9, 1926Sep 13, 1927Standlee Harvey RPacker
US2177601 *Jan 15, 1937Oct 24, 1939George P VerrettCasing packer
US2189839 *Nov 29, 1935Feb 13, 1940Mission Mfg CoSlush pump piston
US2254060 *Apr 20, 1939Aug 26, 1941Merla Tool CompanyPacking element
US2313762 *Dec 6, 1939Mar 16, 1943Lawrence Midgett RollieAutomatic well test seal
US2331185 *May 9, 1940Oct 5, 1943Gordy John SCementing tool
GB191322409A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2449514 *Mar 21, 1946Sep 14, 1948Us Rubber CoOil well packer
US2612953 *May 4, 1946Oct 7, 1952Lane Wells CoPacker
US2624603 *Sep 13, 1949Jan 6, 1953Sweet Oil Well Equipment IncWell packer rubber
US2661064 *Nov 1, 1946Dec 1, 1953Dayton Rubber CompanyOil well packer
US4438938 *Feb 11, 1983Mar 27, 1984Boc-Nowsco LimitedSeal for incorporation in high pressure leak testing tool
US7044231 *Jun 6, 2003May 16, 2006Baker Hughes IncorporatedExpandable packer with anchoring feature
US7096938 *May 20, 2003Aug 29, 2006Baker-Hughes IncorporatedSlip energized by longitudinal shrinkage
US7275598 *Apr 30, 2004Oct 2, 2007Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Uncollapsed expandable wellbore junction
US7367390Mar 29, 2006May 6, 2008Baker Hughes IncorporatedSlip energized by longitudinal shrinkage
WO1993012322A1 *Dec 10, 1992Jun 24, 1993Schlumberger Services PetrolPackers
Classifications
U.S. Classification277/341, 166/187
International ClassificationE21B33/127, E21B33/12
Cooperative ClassificationE21B33/1277
European ClassificationE21B33/127S