|Publication number||US2493092 A|
|Publication date||Jan 3, 1950|
|Filing date||Jan 11, 1946|
|Priority date||Jan 11, 1946|
|Publication number||US 2493092 A, US 2493092A, US-A-2493092, US2493092 A, US2493092A|
|Inventors||Stareck Jesse E|
|Original Assignee||United Chromium Inc|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (8), Classifications (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Patented Jan. 3, 1950 DIETHOD OF ELECTRODEPOSITING COPPER AND RATES THEREFOR Jesse E. Stareck, Birmingham, Mich., assignor to United Chromium, Incorporated, New York, N. Y., a corporation of Delaware No Drawing. Application January 11, 1946, Serial No. 640,680
2 Claims. (Cl. 204-52) This invention relates to the electrodeposition of copper, and to baths therefor, and provides improvements therein.
In U. S. Patent 2,250,556, granted July 9, 1941,
'to Jesse E. Stareck, there is disclosed a process deposited copper on aluminum and stainless steel is obtained, and a superior process and bath for barrel plating is obtained. The inventioncan also be used to good advantage for obtaining strike deposits of copper. The low operating pH makes the process particularly favorable for plating over the more diificult metals, such as magnesium, aluminum, zinc, lead, stainless steel and certain alloy steels and castings.
The bath is like that of Patent #2,250,556, in that it contains the complex copper pyrophosphate ion, Cu(P2Oz) 2; according to the present invention the bath contains the nitrate ion, N03 ammonia (NI-I3), and has a pH between 7.5 and 9.5 (measured by a glass electrode pH meter).
With baths having composition given in the examples which follow, the quantity of N03 ion which is present is from 5 to 20 g./l.
The concentrations of the bath constituents may be varied widely to give satisfactor plating baths. An example of a bath according to the present invention is one containing in solution from 7.5 to 45 g./1 of metallic copper with a pyrophosphate content from that necessary to convert the copper to the complex radical Cu(PzO'1) 2 to an excess limited by saturation. The copper may be conveniently added in the form of copper pyrophosphate, copper sulphate (blue vitriol), or other common cupric compounds of copper. The pyrophosphate radical may be added in the form of an alkali metal pyrophosphate salt either in the hydrated or anhydrous state. From the standpoint of economy of solution cost, the sodium pyrophosphate may be used. However, certain of the other alkali metal pyrophosphates, notably the potassium salt, are more soluble than the sodium salt, and when used can produce baths which are more concentrated, and which, in turn, permit a corresponding increase in plating current densities at the cathode to be attained.
The pyrophosphate radical may be said to combine with the copper in the molecular weight ratio of 2 to 1 to form a pyrophosphate copper complex radical having the formula (CuPzOflz (see Jour. American Chemical Society 1936, pp. 14124429).
In baths used for the electrodeposition of copper on the more noble metals, the proportion of the pyrophosphate radical to copper may vary considerably, but it is advantageous when electrodepositing copper on iron, steel, and other less noble metals, to have an excess of py p p dissolved in the bath beyond that necessary to give the molecular weight ratio of 2 to 1 between P201 and Cu. The baths given in the specific examples contain such an excess of pyrophosphate radicals. The free pyrophosphate content of the bath decreases the tendency for the deposition of copper by immersion on the less noble metals. It also tends to prevent the formation of traces of insoluble salts in the bath and promotes anode corrosion.
About 3 g./l. of ammonia are added to aid anode corrosion with an optimum range from 1 to 3 g./l.
The pH of the bath ranges from 7.5 to 9.5 and is adjusted by adding a suitable acid such as pyrophosphoric acid, or citric acid, or nitric acid, when a test shows that the pH of the bath is higher than the pH desired, or by adding a suitable alkali such as sodium hydroxide for a sodium bath, or potassium hydroxide for a potas-- sium bath, when the test shows that the pH of the bath is lower than the pH desired.
The baths hereinafter described are stable at higher temperatures, up to the boiling point of the solution. No poisonous fumes are evolved. The operating current efiiciency is nearly The throwing power of the baths is excellent. Under ordinary operating conditions, temperatures from to F. are usually preferrerd, although 70 to F. may be used. For a strike solution, temperatures of about 70 to 80 F. are preferred.
Agitation of the solution is desirable. Air agitation is generally used because it is simple, convenient, and causes no buildup of carbonates in this bath. Mechanical agitation or a combination thereof with air agitation is also satisfactory. Agitation of the solution increases the operable current density range. The operable current density range also increases with rising tempera- Examples of baths and of operating conditions for using the invention to the best advantage are given below.
Bath composition for ordinary tank plating Optimum range Cu, 30 g./1 24 to 36 P207, 200 g./l 150 to 250 Citrate radical, 15 g./l to 25 NO3,10 g./1 5110 20 NI-Ia, 1.5 g./l. Ito 3 ,pH, 8.5 8.0 to 9.5 Temperature, 135 F. F 120 to 150 Bath composition for maximum plating speeds Cu, 35 g./l. P207, 230 g./l 190 to 250 Citrate radical, I5 g./l 5 to 25 N03, g./1 5 to 20 NH3,1 /g g./l 1 to 2 pH, 8.5 8.0 to 9.5 Temperature, 140 F F 130 to 150 As hereinbefore stated, current densities of 100 amperes per square foot and more may be used;
with rotating cathodes the current density per a square foot may be 300 amperes per square foot, thus making the process ideally suitable for building up heavy coatings on rolls, electroforms, electrotypes, etc.
The above described process gives deposits which are smooth, fine grained, dense,ductile,
and relatively bright. Being fine grained and 4 dense, the deposit is particularly good as a stopofi for carburizing or for nitriding, often requiring less thickness than usual to prevent carbon penetration.
The baths may have other embodiments than those herein specifically described, and the process may be practiced in other modes than that specifically described.
A related bath is described in my co-pending application Serial No. 503,846, filed September 25, 1943, which has become Patent 2,437,865, granted March 16, 1948.
What is claimed is:
1. .A method of depositing dense and adherent copper, consisting in passing electric current from an anode to a cathode-object immersed in an aqueous bath having a pH between 7.5 and 9.5, and a temperature between F. and 160 F., and in which the bath-consists essentially of 7.5 to 45 g./l. bivalent copper, to 250 g./l. pyrophosphate (P207), 5 to 20 g./l. nitrate (N03) and 1 to 3 g./l. ammonia (NHs).
2. An aqueous bath for copper deposition consisting essentially of 7.5 to 45 g./1. bivalent copper, 100 to 250 g./l. pyrophosphate (P207) 5 to 20 g./1. nitrate (N03) and 1 to 3 g./l. ammonia (NH3) and having a pH between 7.5 and 9.5.
J ESSE E. STARECK.
REFERENCES CITED The following references are of record in the file of this patent:
UNITED STATES PATENTS Number Name Date 2,250,556 Stareck July 29, 1941 2,437,865 Stareck Mar. 16, 1948 OTHER REFERENCES Circular No. 52, Bureau of Standards, second edition, June 28, 1916, page 19.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2250556 *||Nov 26, 1940||Jul 29, 1941||United Chromium Inc||Electrodeposition of copper and bath therefor|
|US2437865 *||Sep 25, 1943||Mar 16, 1948||United Chromium Inc||Method of electrodepositing copper and baths and compositions therefor|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2871171 *||May 10, 1956||Jan 27, 1959||Nesbitt Atkinson James Thomas||Method of electroplating copper on aluminum|
|US3157586 *||Jul 3, 1962||Nov 17, 1964||Albright & Wilson Mfg Ltd||Copper pyrophosphate electroplating baths|
|US3161575 *||Jul 20, 1961||Dec 15, 1964||Albright & Wilson Mfg Ltd||Copper pyrophosphate electroplating solutions|
|US3322656 *||Mar 6, 1962||May 30, 1967||Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co||Metal surface of improved bonding quality|
|US3775268 *||Dec 30, 1971||Nov 27, 1973||Us Navy||Use of lead in a nonorganic-containing copper pyrophosphate bath|
|US6656606||Aug 17, 2000||Dec 2, 2003||The Westaim Corporation||Electroplated aluminum parts and process of production|
|US6692630||Aug 9, 2001||Feb 17, 2004||The Westaim Corporation||Electroplated aluminum parts and process for production|
|US20100326838 *||May 29, 2009||Dec 30, 2010||Atotech Deutschland Gmbh||Pyrophosphate-containing bath for cyanide-free deposition of copper-tin alloys|
|U.S. Classification||205/295, 205/296|