Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2527414 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateOct 24, 1950
Filing dateDec 12, 1949
Priority dateAug 22, 1944
Publication numberUS 2527414 A, US 2527414A, US-A-2527414, US2527414 A, US2527414A
InventorsSimon Hallgren Karl
Original AssigneeSimon Hallgren Karl
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Rubber sole for footwear
US 2527414 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Oct. 24, 1950 K. s. HALLGREN RUBBER SOLE FOR FOOTWEAR Filed Dec. 12, 1949 INVEN TOR.


KARL S/mmv HALLs-Rem Patented Oct. 24, 1950 RUBBER SOLE FOR FOOTWEAR,

Karl Simon Hallgren, Valby, Copenhagen,

' Denmark Application December 12, 1949, Serial No. 132,529 e In Denmark August 22, 1944 Section 1, Public Law 690, August s, 1946 Patent expires August 22, 1964 4 Claims.

H :rms applicationxis a continuation-in-part of my co-pending application Serial No. 641,249, filed January 15, 1946, now abandoned, and em titled Caoutchouc Sole for Footwear.

The inventionrelates to an improved rubber sole construction having a number of highly desirable advantages over the soles previously known to the art. Of particular importance isthe novel manner in which the new sole construction provides a desirable degree of resilience and softness during walking, and yet is sufficiently resistant to large loads as to prevent overloading and the resultant direct transmission of sharp blows or other forces to the feet. This feature of the new sole might be likened to the provision of springs on an automobile in such a manner that the springs are sufficiently resilient to give a soft ride under normal conditions where a slightly bumpy road is being travelled, and which nevertheless will not hit bottom readily and transmit sharp jolts to the riderswhen the automobile travels over a road having deep depressions therein.

The rubber sole of the invention provides relatively large deformation at the loads ordinarily imposed during normal walking. Such loads would probably run between one and three kilograms per square centimeter. Relatively smaller deformations occur duringoverloading, such as when a person jumps onto the step of a bus or streetcar, or in the case where a person runs up a flight of stairs, particularly if the steps are taken two or three at a time. overloading would be likely to run to the order of eight to forty kilograms per square centimeter, orgreater.

Overloading is also likely to occur with previous soles in the case of a person climbing over rocks, or walking on pebbles or stones as large as plums. This local overloadingwhich would occur as a result of the placing of the entire weight of a person, increased in some cases by the additional force of the movement of the person, upon a rather small area could bruise the foot and cause considerable discomfort, as could the overloading which might occur when the weight is placed on the edge of a step or the like. Another important advantage of soles constructed in accordance with the invention is a high degree of thermal insulating power which, together with the advantage previously discussed, is accomplished with a most efficient use of the minimum amount of material in the sole. Thermal insulating of the foot from hot or cold surfaces being walked upon is highly desirable, par- In the latter case, the.

- as desirable in each sole.

ticularly where this can be accomplished without rendering the sole excessively heavy. Obviously, almost any sole could be given good insulating properties if weight is not to be considered as a factor, or if other desirable features can be disregarded, such as the resistance to overloading previously discussed. However,'applicant has provided a high degree of thermal insulating power in a shoe sole while maintaining the weight low and at the same time providing the other desirable features referred to herein.

A further advantage of soles constructed according to the inventon is the evenness of wear of such soles compared with prior art soles. Since weight is a factor to be considered in rubber shoe soles, the most efficient use possible should be made of the quantity of material decided upon Efficiency of use of the given quantity of material also includes evenness of wear, since a sole which wears out in particular areas before other areas are worn out, must be thrown away while there still remains a considerable quantity of sole material which should have been used, but which must be wasted.

Uneven wear also results in uneven transmission of forces to the foot, and may, for this reason, require discarding of a shoe long before the sole material has all been utilized. The applicant has personal knowledge of a pair of shoes made in accordance with Frisch British Patent No. 510,426, the soles of which, after some months of wear, showed deep depressions on their bottom sides These depressions, caused by uneven wear, extendtransversely of the sole below the ball of the foot below the ribs on the upper side of the sole. Obviously, there was uneven transmission of forces to the feet, and the local wear at particular places was wearing out the sole material in such manner that the shoe would have to be discarded or resoled long before all of the material of the sole had been used.

It is an important object of the invention to provide a sole having the advantages discussed above, and it is also an object of the invention to. provide a sole in which not one, but all of the desired advantages are incorporated.

. Another Very important object of the invention, is the provision of a rubber 'shoe sole having a cent ribs diverge from each other as they extend upwardly. This provision of the triangularly cross sectioned, downwardly pointing air spaces causes the ribs to become what might be termed mutually supporting as increased loads are placed on the sole. This causes the sole to provide the above-explained feature of resisting overloading, while providing softness during normal walking. What occurs is that adjacent wallsof adjacent triangular ribs are brought increasingly together, beginning where they come together at the downwardly extending vertex of the intervening air space, their area of contact increasing in an upwardly extending direction and in a progressive manner as greater loads are applied. The elastic resistance of the sole to the applied pressure'will increase progressively with increasing compression of the sole and the increase in the rib wall areas which are in contact. It can be seen that the extreme condition would be when the entire wallareasof the ribs in the region of the pressure are in contact with the adjacent rib walls, the result being a change of the triangular ribs to more nearly square ribs, with each rib being supported against further sideward expansion by one or more adjacent ribs. Between the extreme condition just described and the other extreme of zero pressure, the sole provides a variable resistance to pressure, the resistance increasing progressively as the pressure and compression increase.

Another object of the invention is to provide a sole asde'scribed herein, in which the angles defining thetransverse'ribs are so chosen as to enablethe ribs to function in accordance with the invention. 7 p

A further object of the invention is to provide a novel method of making a rubber sole.

These and other objects of the invention will be apparent from the following specification taken in conjunction. with the accompanying drawings, in. which Fig. 1 is a longitudinal cross sectional view taken through a solemade in accordance with the invention;

Fig. 2 is a bottom face view ofthe sole shown in Fig. 1;

Fig. 3 is a fragmentary longitudinal sectional View of a portion of the sole shown in Fig, l, and

showing the sole under an intermediate degree of compression;

Fig. 4 is a view similar to Fig. 3, but showing the effect of an extreme degree of compression;

Fig. 5 is a diagrammatic view showing the result when the top angle is too large and the of the ribs and on the upper edge. of the, solid edge or rim portion 2. The ribs 3 may be made integral with the sole I which may have reinforcing cord fabric therein at 4 extending from the shank 5 to the front edge of the sole, or the ribs 3 may be separate from the sole I and attached thereto as by cement, stitching, or vulcanizing The sole I can be made from a'single rubber sheet to which a thin leather rim 1 would be attached and to which, in turn, the vamp of the shoe would be attached. A thin layer of cork dust 8 may b placed under the ball of the foot in accordance with known practice.

In making the sole described above, it. may be desirable to make both the sole I and the ribs 3 of the same type of rubber, or it may be desirable to make the two parts of difierent types of rubber, selecting a. particular rubber according to the properties desired in the particular part of the canizing both to the bottom sole and to the upper sole.

A simple, yet efiective method of makinga sole would be to place the lower part of the sole 1 in one form and to place the ribs portion of the sole in another form, the two forms then being brought face to face and heated for 'vulcanizing the two parts together.

While I have referred to the ribs 3 as being substantially triangular in cross section, they maybe slightly flattenedat their upper edges.

However, the triangularity of the air spaces is very important and is essential in achieving the mutually supporting feature discussed above.

In'use, soles according to my invention absorb the pressures of normal walking by compression of the ribs, 3, and as the pressure increases, the ribs become increasingly more mutually supporting up to what might be considered a moderately heavy pressure, at which point the ribs would assume the type of configuration shown in Fig. 3. The ribs would continue to move together with increase in pressure until the extreme shown in Fig. 4 were reached. The advantages of the type of. operation just referred to, and which are achieved only by the type of sole described herein, are well explained in the opening paragraphs of this specification.

It is essential to the successful operation of a sole constructed in accordance with the invention, that the top angle and the apex angle as defined by Fig. 6, be within certain critical ranges. While the angles could vary somewhat with the type ofrubber used, the types of rubber which would generally be used would require that the apex angle should be no smaller than 30-40, in which case the top angle would be -100. If the apex angle is smaller, the ribs will not have the property of becoming mutually supporting, but will behave like a plate with an uneven surface, with resulting uneven compression when loaded. This would also cause the pressure on the top of the sole to be concentrated in limited areas H], as shown in Fig. 5, causing uneven wear of the tread surface. If the ribs have the type of configuration preferred by applicant, the pressure on the tops of the rib will be scattered over the entire bottom or tread surface of the sole in an even manner, resulting in even wear and the cushioned walk peculiar to soles so constructed.

The ribs 3 should not be too slender, for the result will be insufficient transverse support, and the ribs may bend transversely. The apex angle should therefore not exceed 70-75, corresponding to a top angle of 40-30.

Thus the range of angles for the apex angle is 30-75 and for the top angle is 120-30.

I claim:

1. A rubber shoe sole comprising a bottom sole having upstanding edge portions forming a cavity therein, and an interior sole portion in the" form of transversely extending ribs of substantially triangular cross section positioned within said cavity with the bases of the ribs on the upper surface of the sole and with the lower end portions of the upwardly extending side walls of the ribs meeting the side walls of adjacent ribs to form downwardly pointed air spaces of triangular cross section between the ribs, the size of said ribs being such that the adjacent walls of said ribs are brought increasingly together as the load increases, correspondingly decreasing the size of said air spaces whereby the ribs become mutually supporting to an increasing degree under increasing pressures.

2. A rubber shoe sole as set forth in claim 1, in which the bottom sole and the ribs are of difierent types of rubber.

3. A rubber shoe sole as set forth in claim 1, in which the ribs in portions of the shoe differ in the material used from ribs in other portions of the shoe.

4. A sole as set forth in claim 1, in which the apex angle of the ribs lies in the range -75 and the top angle lies in the range -30.


REFERENCES CITED The following references are of record in the file of this patent:


Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2037105 *Aug 14, 1933Apr 14, 1936Crown Cork & Seal CoLaminated article and method of manufacture
US2038972 *Mar 12, 1934Apr 28, 1936Chikazo WatanabeSole
US2104583 *Aug 23, 1934Jan 4, 1938Daly Bros Shoe Company IncRubber sole
US2251468 *Apr 5, 1939Aug 5, 1941Salta CorpRubber shoe sole
US2287282 *Mar 9, 1939Jun 23, 1942Goodrich Co B FMethod of making flat articles having grooved surfaces
US2295763 *Jan 27, 1940Sep 15, 1942Us Rubber CoMethod of molding shoe soles
NO72155A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2930149 *Jan 28, 1959Mar 29, 1960Ripple Sole CorpResilient shoe sole and wedge construction
US2995840 *Jan 11, 1960Aug 15, 1961American Biltrite Rubber CoShoe with molded elastomeric sole
US3079707 *Dec 14, 1959Mar 5, 1963Colman Benjamin WResilient shoe soles
US3079708 *May 23, 1962Mar 5, 1963Colman Benjamin WResilient shoe soles
US3087261 *Oct 31, 1960Apr 30, 1963Forward Slant Sole CompanySlant cell shoe sole
US3087262 *Apr 24, 1961Apr 30, 1963Forward Slant Sole CompanyResilient shoe sole
US3172217 *Feb 21, 1963Mar 9, 1965Colman Benjamin WResilient shoe sole and heel construction
US3175309 *Apr 5, 1962Mar 30, 1965J F Mcelwain CompanyUnitary shoe and heel
US3205595 *Apr 21, 1964Sep 14, 1965Funck Kg Dr IngVentilated water-tight footwear
US4026044 *Aug 13, 1976May 31, 1977Citc Industries, Inc.Article of footwear and method of making same
US4043058 *May 21, 1976Aug 23, 1977Brs, Inc.Athletic training shoe having foam core and apertured sole layers
US4044479 *Feb 13, 1976Aug 30, 1977Eb Sport International Gmbh VormalsShell sole
US4075772 *Apr 21, 1975Feb 28, 1978Amilcare CavalieriInsole for footwears
US4297797 *Dec 18, 1978Nov 3, 1981Meyers Stuart RTherapeutic shoe
US4445283 *Oct 10, 1980May 1, 1984Synapco Ltd.Footwear sole member
US4638577 *May 20, 1985Jan 27, 1987Riggs Donnie EShoe with angular slotted midsole
US4817304 *Aug 31, 1987Apr 4, 1989Nike, Inc. And Nike International Ltd.Footwear with adjustable viscoelastic unit
US5233767 *Sep 27, 1991Aug 10, 1993Hy KramerArticle of footwear having improved midsole
US5493791 *May 10, 1993Feb 27, 1996Hy KramerArticle of footwear having improved midsole
US5815949 *Jun 10, 1997Oct 6, 1998Sessa; Raymond V.Footwear insert providing air circulation
US5946824 *Aug 19, 1997Sep 7, 1999Orion Sports & Leisure, Inc.Sole support structure for an athletic shoe
US6061928 *Dec 9, 1997May 16, 2000K-Swiss Inc.Shoe having independent packed cushioning elements
US6754982Nov 30, 2001Jun 29, 2004Wolverine World Wide, Inc.Shoe cushioning system and related method of manufacture
US6951066 *Jul 1, 2003Oct 4, 2005The Rockport Company, LlcCushioning sole for an article of footwear
US7225491May 18, 2004Jun 5, 2007Wolverine World Wide, Inc.Shoe cushioning system and related method of manufacture
US20120210606 *Feb 23, 2011Aug 23, 2012Nike, Inc.Sole assembly for article of footwear with interlocking members
EP0289985A2 *May 3, 1988Nov 9, 1988Gerd GöllerShoe sole with a massaging and ventilating insole
EP0666039A2 *Feb 1, 1995Aug 9, 1995Wolverine World Wide, Inc.Shoe construction with internal cushioning ribs
WO1991011928A1 *Feb 4, 1991Aug 22, 1991Hy KramerArticle of footwear having improved midsole
U.S. Classification36/32.00R
International ClassificationA43B13/18
Cooperative ClassificationA43B13/181
European ClassificationA43B13/18A