Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2530124 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateNov 14, 1950
Filing dateMay 29, 1944
Priority dateMay 29, 1944
Publication numberUS 2530124 A, US 2530124A, US-A-2530124, US2530124 A, US2530124A
InventorsKieckhefer Robert J
Original AssigneeAmerican Lace Paper Company
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Nested cup
US 2530124 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

R. J. KIECKHEFER NESTED CUP Nov. 14, 1950 Filed May 29, 1944 INVENTOZ Eaaerd. MECKHEFEK BY 4% MVAM ATTOKNEYS Patented Nov. 14, 1950 Robert J. K-ieckhefer, Brookfield, Wis., assignor to American-Lace Paper Company, Milwaukee, Wi's., a corporation of Wisconsin ApplicationMay 29, 1944, Serial No. 537,833

5 Claims.

This invention relates to improvements in nestedcups and cups adapted for nesting;

In the manufacture of cups having a bottom flush with the lower margin of thewalls and merging therewith on a gradual curve, it is found that the angle of. the cup wall to the vertical is only acceptable commercially ifconfined within an extremely'narrow range of" angles. Cups of the class referred to: are made of pulp, paper, plastics, and other materials. In such cups, as heretofore made, therehas been nothing to. restrict the telescopic nesting interengagement of the cups except the contact between the walls themselves. In this respect, such cups are different from cups so madethat the bottom is elevated and serves to. limit the nesting engagement.

Where the nesting. engagement is limited by contact between the walls, the angularityof wall usually requiredcommercially permits the walls to wedge so tightly as to make difficult the sepaa ration of the cups in the nested stack becauseof the friction of the area of the wall surface in nested contact. Awall angularity of such degree as will virtually eliminate friction between such surfaces as are in nested contact so-reduces the size of the'bottom in relation to the size of the lip as to make the cup appear awkwardand the cup is in actual fact top-heavy and easy to upset.

It is the object of. thepresent invention to provide means incorporated externally in the wall of the cup to prevent wedging and facilitate separation of the cups in the stack without requiring the wall angle to be increased beyond the range dictated by commercial considerations. It will be apparent that not every means of limiting the nesting movement would be suitable. Whatever limiting means is employed must be such as will not interfere with the withdrawal of the cup from any moldsor forming dies used in cup'manufacture, and the preferred means will not render the cup unsightly or impair its strength, or make it difficult to clean or interfere with any operations which may subsequently be performed upon it.

In the drawings:

Figure l'is a view partially in side elevation and partially in section showing a stack of cups embodying the invention.

Figure 2 is an enlarged fragmentary detail of a lower side portion and bottom of one of the cups.

Figure 3 is a fragmentary detail view on the scale of Figure 1, showing a modified form of cup embodying my invention.

Like parts are identified by the same reference characters throughout the several views.

Each of the cups 3 is formed in such a manner that the major length of its side wall 4 comprises the frustum of a cone having approximately a seven degree angle to the axis of the cone. The

2. Y bottom 5 is integral with the side walLthe-iimer surfaces merging on abroad curve as indicated at 6. The bottom may have anupward convexity so as to ensure non-interference with the firm seat providedlby theannular: exterior surface at]. 1 r.

The particular cups herein disclosed are molded of paper pulp, but, asabove indicated; the invention is alsoapplicable tocups ofLot'her materials, whether molded or fabricated. The

particular advantages-of the invention are-realized when the relation of the bottom .to the side Wall is such that the cup bottom does not provide a stop limiting the wedging of one cup within another.

To overcome such wed'ging, the first disclosed embodiment of the present invention contem-'- plates that each cup be provided at H) with a cylindrical surface deviating from the general frusto-conical external surface of the wall 4. V

This results in thickening the wall in the'zone indicated at I0 and increasing the radius ofthe curve at H as compared with the radius-of the interior curve at 6. Although the wall surface it may appear, tothe eye, to'fiare outwardly in a downwardly direction, the fact is that his cylindrical, thus making it possible to withdraw such a cup from a forming die in the usual'manner and'to conduct pressure finishing operationsin the usual manner.

The difference in the overall radial dimensionsof' the'cupzon'e l0, II, when thecupis made in accordance with this invention, as com pared with the corresponding dimensions of prior art cups, omitting the cylindrical surface l0,

may be so slight as to be of the order of 6 of an inch. Yet, as clearly shown in Figure l; the

cylindrical zone of each cup serves to space the entire remaining wall portions of each cup*approximately of andrzch-from" the wall portions of other cups withwhich it is nested. No matter how firmly cups embodying this invention are stacked together in the nested form illustrated in Figure l, the slightest tilting of the changed and the thickening of the wall to the slight extent necessary to provide a cylindrical surface at [0 not only has the advantage as above described, but actually increases the stability and meets the other objectives specified for the invention.

In the modified embodiment of Figure 3, the cup I3 has its wall M at the same angle of approximately seven degrees to the axis which the experience of the industry has found to be desirable. Its inner surface at 16 retains its conventional smooth and easily cleaned shape, having neither ribs nor flutes.

Its lower external surface, instead of being fully cylindrical as in the construction shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, merely approaches a cylindrical outline to the extent that it is provided with ribs at 26, the apices of which extend to an imaginary cylinder. For such material as plastics or the like this is a very satisfactory arrangement to keep the otherwise frusto-conical wall portions of nested cups out of contact. Plastics are sufficiently firm and unyielding so that a full cylindrical contour is not necessary for the 4 purpose. The less dense and more easily compressible the material of which the cup is made, the more important it may be to have the zone l approach a fully cylindrical form.

It will be understood that the ribs 26 illustrated in Figure 3 exemplify but one possibility in the way of providing projections from the external base portion of each cup to space its frustoconical wall portions from the like Wall portions of other cups. Like the full cylindrical outline shown at I0 in Figure 1, the ribs of Figure 3 have the advantage of permitting easy withdrawal of such a cup from a forming die or mold.

I claim;

1. A molded container having a generally frusto-conical Wall and an integral bottom with which both the interior and exterior surfaces of the wallmerge curvilinearly, the said wall being provided immediately above the inner surface of said bottom: with external spacing means comprising portions slightly thickened outwardly beyond a downward-projection of the frusto-conical external surfaceptthe-rest of the wall but within a; cylindrical outline V merging therewith so that the container may be withdrawn from a-mold, the overall diameter of said spacing means being smaller than the interior of all portions of the cup oth'er than the extreme bottom portions thereof, wherebysaidcontainer may be nested in a like container, the said spacing means providing only tangential contact between containers soneste'd. v

2. The container of claim 1 in which the slightly thickenedwall' portions have the form of peripherally spaced projections.

3. The container of claim 1 in which the walls are of substantially uniform thickness throughout a major portion of their height, deviating from such substantial uniformity only where thickened. adjacent the bottom as aforesaid.

4. A molded one-piece container adapted to 4 nest compactly with identical containers and yet to be readily freed from any tendency toward frictional retention in nested engagement, said container comprising a generally frusto-conical wall and integral bottom, the wall being generally of uniform thickness and having inner and outer surfaces at substantially uniform spacing except in a predetermined narrow periphera1 zone in a Wall portion otherwise substantially fully engageable with a like nested cup, one of said surfaces having a portion deviating gradually from the other in said zone to increase the wall thickness and to vary said surface portion from frustoconical toward a cylindrical form, whereby the said portion can be withdrawn from a mold and will nevertheless provide contact of the deviating surface substantially in a peripheral line about a like nested cup, cups so nested being elsewhere spacedby the said thickened wall and relatively pivotable upon each other at said zone for releasing any tendency toward frictional retention. 5. A one-piece container of molded pulp adapt: ed to nest compactly With identical containers and yet to bereadily freed from any tendency toward frictional retention in nested engagement, said container comprising a generally frustoconical wall of substantially uniform thickness throughout most of its height, and a bottom integral with the wall and having inner and outer surfaces, the said wall flaring upwardly at an angle of approximately seven degrees from its axis and being of substantially uniform thickness for almost all of its height, a portion of said wall having a substantially cylindrical surface in a narrow zone above the inner surface of said bottom merging smoothly with an adjacent frustoconical surface thereof, whereby said container may be drawn from a mold and nevertheless the said cylindrical surface will provide a substantial- 1y linear peripheral spacing contact with an identical nestedcontainer to permit relative pivotal movement of the nested containers to free them from mutual frictional retention.


. REFERENCES CITED The following references are of record in the file of this patent:' a


Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US839970 *Sep 5, 1905Jan 1, 1907Charles W TaylorShaving-cup.
US952197 *Nov 15, 1909Mar 15, 1910American Water Supply Company Of New EnglandDrinking-cup.
US1116676 *Feb 11, 1911Nov 10, 1914American Paper Goods CompanyDrinking-cup.
US1238092 *Apr 25, 1916Aug 28, 1917Eugen BlassEarthenware vessel.
US2058336 *Jun 5, 1936Oct 20, 1936Mccarty Hiram GCombination flask and cup
US2177337 *Nov 20, 1937Oct 24, 1939Stein AlexanderAutomatic illuminated glass holder
US2316150 *Apr 2, 1942Apr 13, 1943Universal Paper Products CompaPaper cup
USD95903 *Aug 24, 1934Jun 11, 1935 Design fob a whisky glass
USD100579 *May 19, 1936Jul 28, 1936 Design for a tumbler or similar
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2738914 *Oct 31, 1950Mar 20, 1956Keyes Fibre CoFruit and vegetable container
US2803375 *Apr 12, 1954Aug 20, 1957Philip MeshbergNestable vessels
US2805790 *Aug 24, 1954Sep 10, 1957Crown Machine And Tool CompanyPlastic containers and packaging thereof
US2808168 *Aug 6, 1954Oct 1, 1957Helmut MajerConical bottle capsule
US2905350 *Nov 29, 1957Sep 22, 1959Illinois Tool WorksCup for hot beverages
US2988258 *Dec 17, 1957Jun 13, 1961Witzke Helen GCup
US3045887 *Jan 28, 1958Jul 24, 1962Caine James RThin walled plastic container
US3078025 *May 10, 1961Feb 19, 1963Illinois Tool WorksSheet formed molded articles
US3091360 *Oct 29, 1958May 28, 1963Illinois Tool WorksNestable cup
US3093241 *Jan 29, 1960Jun 11, 1963Schmidt MaxPackage, in particular for hollow bodies sensitive to pressure such as christmas tree balls
US3094240 *Mar 22, 1962Jun 18, 1963Illinois Tool WorksMolded nestable container having indicia protection means
US3169688 *Jul 25, 1960Feb 16, 1965Traders Leasing LtdThin walled container
US3169689 *May 13, 1963Feb 16, 1965Traders Leasing LtdThin walled container
US3200552 *Oct 18, 1962Aug 17, 1965St Regis Paper CoInsulative building board
US3220595 *Nov 27, 1963Nov 30, 1965Illinois Tool WorksThin wall container with strengthening and insulating characteristics
US3220631 *Apr 23, 1964Nov 30, 1965Diamond Int CorpDisplay tray
US3266676 *Mar 4, 1964Aug 16, 1966Mckernan Edward JTamperproof cap for aerosol bomb
US3933336 *Apr 26, 1974Jan 20, 1976Cato, Inc.Pipe sleeve
US4217857 *Apr 24, 1978Aug 19, 1980M.H.G., Inc.Pet relief station
US4586709 *Aug 23, 1984May 6, 1986Godinet Wayne PCup stacking game apparatus
US4602557 *Jul 13, 1984Jul 29, 1986John YipLiquid brewing cup
US4774046 *Oct 7, 1986Sep 27, 1988Chugoku Pearl & Co., Ltd.Method of molding a synthetic resin container
US4919278 *Jan 31, 1989Apr 24, 1990Howen Phillip JHolder for containers and covers
US5410987 *Feb 22, 1994May 2, 1995Simmons; Harlan M.Animal waste disposal apparatus
US5582134 *Apr 28, 1995Dec 10, 1996Simmons; Harlan M.Animal waste disposal apparatus having rotatable sieve and method
US5617972 *Mar 24, 1995Apr 8, 1997Playtex Products Inc.Nurser liner
US6270003 *Jun 15, 1999Aug 7, 2001Hirano Shiki Co., Ltd.Cake container
US7370788 *May 6, 1999May 13, 2008Kao CorporationFormed body
US7938574 *Aug 9, 2004May 10, 2011Mcgill Technology LimitedMixing apparatus
US8142068Apr 29, 2011Mar 27, 2012Mcgill Technology LimitedMixing apparatus
US8870003Mar 31, 2010Oct 28, 2014Greater Good, Inc.Biodegradable container for liquid and/or semi-solid products
US20060209627 *Aug 9, 2004Sep 21, 2006Mcgill Shane RMixing apparatus
US20090050595 *May 20, 2008Feb 26, 2009Lackey Robert WTethered two piece nestable bottle
US20090200301 *Feb 2, 2009Aug 13, 2009The Wornick CompanyContainers and Container Assemblies
US20100084361 *Oct 1, 2009Apr 8, 2010Dayton Douglas CBiodegradable container for liquid and/or semi-solid products
US20100252617 *Mar 31, 2010Oct 7, 2010Dayton Douglas CBiodegradable container for liquid and/or semi-solid products
US20110205834 *Aug 25, 2011Mcgill Technology LimitedMixing Apparatus
DE1177024B *Aug 10, 1953Aug 27, 1964Helmut MajerKonische Flaschenkapsel
U.S. Classification229/406, 206/515, 215/10
International ClassificationB65D1/22, B65D1/26
Cooperative ClassificationB65D1/265
European ClassificationB65D1/26B