Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2530991 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateNov 21, 1950
Filing dateSep 28, 1944
Priority dateSep 28, 1944
Publication numberUS 2530991 A, US 2530991A, US-A-2530991, US2530991 A, US2530991A
InventorsHerbert M Reeves
Original AssigneeFlorence Stove Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Gas cookstove burner grate
US 2530991 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Nov. 21, 1950 H. M. REEVES GAS COOKSTOVE BURNER GRATE Filed Sept. 28, 1944 TTOWJ Patented Nov. 21, 1950 GAS COOKSTOVE BURNER GRATE Herbert M. Reeves, Kankakee, Ill., assignor to Florence Stove Company, Gardner, Mass, a corporation of Massachusetts Application September 28, 1944, Serial No. 556,178

1 Claim. 1

The invention relates to improvements in cooking tops for gaseous fuel cook stoves and more particularly to a novel utensil support Or grate for use therewith and to a novel method of making the grates.

The general object of the invention is to provide a novel grate structure of simple and rugged construction which is attractive in appearance, efficient in operation and capable of being produced at relatively low cost.

More specifically, it is an object of the invention to provide a novel grate adapted to be fabricated from sheet metal in accordance with a novel method of construction which materially reduces manufacturing costs while producing a structure having greater strength and higher operating efficiency than conventional cast iron grates.

Another object is to provide a novel grate capable of being produced from sheet metal stock by means of simple stamping and bending operations..

A further object is to provide a grate in which the mass of metal subjected to the heat of the burner is materially less than that of cast iron grates with a corresponding reduction in heat loss due to conduction and which is not only stronger than such cast iron grates but is substantially unbreakable.

Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment illustrated in the accompanying drawing in which:

Figure 1 is a perspective view of a grate embodyin the features of and constructed in accordance with the novel method of the present invention.

Fig. 2 is a perspective view of a partially formed blank from which the improved grate is fabricated.

Fig. 3 is a perspective view showing the manner in which the blanks are formed from a continuous strip of stock.

Fig. 4 is a perspective view showing an intermediate stop in the method of fabricating the improved grate.

While the invention is susceptible of various modifications and alternative constructions, I have shown in the drawings and will herein describe in detail the preferred embodiment, but it is to be understood that I do not thereby intend to limit the invention to the specific form disclosed, but intend to cover all modifications and alternative constructions falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as expressed in the appended claim.

Referring to the drawings, the improved grate in the preferred form shown in Fig. 1 is of more or less conventional form comprising a body member 5 adapted to fit within the burner well of a gaseous fuel cook stove and provided with a series of uniformly spaced generally radially disposed utensil supporting fingers B. In carrying out the invention, the improved grate is fabricated from sheet metal which provides ample strength and rigidity while greatly reducing the mass of metal exposed to the flame of the burner and correspondingly reducing the heat loss through conduction. Moreover, by reason of this construction, a grate may be made by a novel method utilizing simple stamping and bending operations which materially reduces the cost of the grate.

In the exemplary grate, as shown in Fig. 1, the body 5 is annular in form but it can of course be made in any desired shape to fit a selected burner well. Eire term annular as used herein is intended to cover such other shapes. The fingers E3, herein shown as generally arcuate in the direction of their length, are formed to present their upper edges in a common horizontal plane for engagement with the bottom of a utensil to be supported over the burner.

Relatively narrow upright standards or webs 1 integral with the band 5 and fingers i5 rigidly connect the lower edges of the latter with the adjacent upper edge of the band, the webs being twisted about vertical axes to position the fingers generally radially of the body 5. Preferably, the spacing of the webs with respect to the ends of the fingers is such that the major portion of each finger projects inwardly toward the center of the grate leaving a shorter portion or extension 8 projecting outwardly to support the grate upon the top of the stove structure. To provide a point contact with the stove top, the extensions 8 are conveniently formed with depending rounded lugs 9.

By reason of its novel construction, as above described, the improved grate can be produced very economically in accordance with an improved method utilizing only simple stamping and bending operations. Thus according to the preferred method, a flat elongated blank is initially formed by stamping a series of appropriately shaped notches lli along one edge of a strip II of sheet metal of a width corresponding to the overall height of the grate. The unnotched edge portion of the blank which forms the band substantially .on the center line of the same.

cent finger.

or body 5 of the grate is then cut transversely at spaced points 12 (Fig. 3) into sections l3. The length of the sections is determined by the circumferential dimensions of the finished grate as are likewise the length and spacing of the notches l0. Each of the sections 13 constitutes a complete blank .for the fabrication of a grate.

The stamped sections I3 are rolled or otherwise bent into annular configuration as shown in Fig. 4. In this intermediate form of the blank, it will be observed that the fingers 6 are arouately bent similar to the band portion 5 of the blank and that the ends of the latter abut. The abutting ends are rigidly secured together as by butt welding thus providing a strong and rigid structure. In the final step of the fabricating method, the webs 7 connecting the band 5 with the fingers 6 are twisted about axes parallel to the axis of the band to position the fingers generally radially of the grate structure as shown in Fig. 1.

In the blank tor the exemplary grate, the notches 10 are generally .L-Shaped each consisting of an elongated slot 14 extending longitudinally of the blank and having one edge located A transverse slot 15 extends from the other edge of the slot 14 to the adjacent edge of the strip to separate .the forward or inner end of one finger from the rear or outer end of the adja- The slot .15 is located with reference to the ends of the slot l4 so that the stamping of the notch .10 forms the inwardly extending end portion of one finger and the outwardly extending portion .of the adjacent finger.

The spacing .of the notches l0 longitudinally of the strip 1.! is such as to leave a relatively narrow web 7 connecting the band 5 with each finger .6. It will be understood, of course, that the notches 10 may be stamped singly or in 1' groups as preferred. In either case, a small, generallysemi-circular notch 16 may be stamped simultaneously in the lower edge of the strip H substantially in .alinement with the web 7 for convenience in locating the strip for the stampingof the next notch or notches.

In the particular grate illustrated, the notches 10 are dimensioned and spaced apart to form .six of the fingers 6 in each blank section I 3.

The dimensions of .the notches may be varied, if

desired, to form more or less of the fingers 6 although under such conditions, the length of each finger must be suitably proportioned to the circum-ferential dimension of the grate.

It will be apparent from the foregoing that 1 the invention provides a grate structure for burners of gaseous fuel cook stoves which is simple and rugged in construction and attractive .creased as there is less heat loss from .conduction.

The novel grate structure lends itself particularly well to production in accordance with a novel method utilizing only simple stamping and bending operations. Thus the cost of producing such grates is reduced to a very low figure yet the resulting grate structure is superior to rates heretofore available.

I claim as my invention:

A grate for gaseous fuel cook stove burners comprising, in combination, a continuous annular band of relatively thin sheet metal, a plurality .of narrow upwardly projectin standards integral with said band and spaced apart circumferentially around the upper edge of the.

band, a 'like plurality of elongated utensil supporting fingers disposed in a plane parallel to the plane of theba-nd and spaced upwardly therefrom, each of said fingers overlying one of said standards and being integrally joined intermediate its .ends to the upper end of that standard, said standards being twisted about axes parallel to the central axis of 'the band to position said fingers generally radially of th :band with opposite end portions projecting respectively inwardly and outwardly relative .to the band, the outwardly projecting portions of said fingers serving to support the grate on a stove structure.


REFERENCES CITED The following references are .of record in the file .Of this patent:

UNIT-ED STATES PATENTS Number 'Name Date 374,533 Northall Dec. 6, 1887 624,047 Keiper May 2, 1899 688,960 Moon Dec. 17, 1901 901,326 Ebert Oct. 20, 1908 1,007,633 Beaton Oct. 31, 1911 1,079,767 ,Jeavons Nov. 25, 1913 1,195,313 Whitmer Aug. .22, 1916 1,256,665 Douglas -Feb. 19, 1918 1,260,562 McIntosh Mar. 26, 1918 1,355,933 Wilcox Oct. 19, 1920 1,370,083 Blackmore Mar. 1, 1921 1,377,300 Withington M n". May 10, 1921 1,490,421 Falley Apr. 15., 1924 1,663,438 Brumbaugh Mar. ,20, 1928 1,697,184 Harner Jan. 1, 1929 1,759,148 Wilcox vMay '20, 1930 1,888,515 Stockholder .Nov. 22, 1932 1,977,113 Baresch Oct. 16, 1934 2,006,283 Staempfli June 25,1935 2,065,875 Sargent Dec. 29, 1936 2,142,418 Stocker Jan. 3, 1939 2,164,619 McLeod July 4, 1939 2,311,730 Bowers Feb. 23,1943 2,424,443 Evans July 22, 1947 2,432,267 Adamson Dec. 9, 1947 FOREIGN PATENTS Number Country Date 517,533 Germany Feb. 5, 1931

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US374533 *Dec 6, 1887FHeebeet geay
US624047 *Jun 9, 1898May 2, 1899 Process of manufacturing ball-retainers for antifriction-bearings
US688960 *Jun 17, 1901Dec 17, 1901George R MoonGasolene or gas stove.
US901326 *Jun 13, 1907Oct 20, 1908Hannah C EbertSkillet-support.
US1007633 *Jan 10, 1911Oct 31, 1911Beaton And Cadwell Mfg CompanyProcess of making floor and ceiling plates.
US1079767 *May 1, 1912Nov 25, 1913William R JeavonsGrate.
US1195313 *Sep 25, 1914Aug 22, 1916P Owewhitmer
US1256665 *Mar 17, 1916Feb 19, 1918Douglas & Rudd Mfg CoCircuit-coupling.
US1260562 *Apr 7, 1917Mar 26, 1918John G HealFan construction.
US1355933 *Jan 31, 1916Oct 19, 1920Wilcox Lewis TLiquid-fuel stove
US1370083 *Mar 12, 1920Mar 1, 1921Blackmore Charles CRotary fan
US1377300 *Sep 8, 1917May 10, 1921Sparks Withington CoManufacture of fans
US1490421 *Jul 17, 1922Apr 15, 1924M H FalleyMethod of forming sheet metal
US1663438 *Dec 27, 1924Mar 20, 1928American Stove CoStove
US1697184 *Mar 3, 1928Jan 1, 1929Union Mfg CoTop grate for gas stoves
US1759148 *Feb 4, 1927May 20, 1930Lewis T WilcoxGrate for oil and gas stoves
US1888515 *Oct 30, 1931Nov 22, 1932Stockholder John HBoiler cleaner
US1977113 *Nov 8, 1932Oct 16, 1934Frank Baresch WilliamMethod of making igniter hoods
US2006283 *Jul 19, 1934Jun 25, 1935Staempfli JosephMachine for making boiler cleaner nozzles
US2065875 *Nov 22, 1935Dec 29, 1936Sargent Ralph MUtensil support
US2142418 *Sep 8, 1936Jan 3, 1939Nat Stamping & Electric WorksCoffee maker stove
US2164619 *Aug 2, 1937Jul 4, 1939Mcleod Robert RApparatus for use with coffee brewers
US2311730 *Mar 28, 1940Feb 23, 1943Power Res CorpMethod of making reversely folded piston rings
US2424443 *Dec 6, 1944Jul 22, 1947Gen ElectricDynamoelectric machine
US2432267 *Aug 1, 1944Dec 9, 1947Gen ElectricWinding of electric machines
DE517533C *Dec 17, 1929Feb 9, 1931Carl Winzerling FaVerfahren zur Herstellung von Schlossgehaeusen
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3869778 *Jun 29, 1973Mar 11, 1975Raymond W YanceyArticle of manufacture with twisted web
US5755034 *Oct 24, 1996May 26, 1998Nagase & Co., Ltd.Method for manufacturing a hub ring for a filter
US6253759 *Aug 13, 1999Jul 3, 2001Sunbeam Products, Inc.Side burner for a grill
US7363923 *Jan 5, 2005Apr 29, 2008Illinois Tool Works range assembly and monolithic drip pan
US7721727 *May 4, 2007May 25, 2010Paloma Industries, LimitedCooking stove
US20020162923 *Mar 26, 2002Nov 7, 2002Allen GeddesSupport for a cooking vessel
US20060144253 *Jan 5, 2005Jul 6, 2006Charles CzajkaCooking range assembly and monolithic drip pan
US20070199558 *May 4, 2007Aug 30, 2007Paloma Industries, LimitedCooking stove
US20080029082 *Aug 4, 2006Feb 7, 2008Dowst W PerryInterchangeable system for high-efficiency heating and cooking
US20130125400 *Feb 7, 2011May 23, 2013Guy C. ClappStructural arrangement for generally planar devices
U.S. Classification126/214.00C, D07/408, 29/897, 428/597, 126/39.00H, 428/579
International ClassificationF24C15/10
Cooperative ClassificationF24C15/107
European ClassificationF24C15/10D