Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2582140 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJan 8, 1952
Filing dateNov 4, 1949
Priority dateNov 4, 1949
Publication numberUS 2582140 A, US 2582140A, US-A-2582140, US2582140 A, US2582140A
InventorsLeek Wayne E
Original AssigneeRemington Arms Co Inc
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Shooting rest
US 2582140 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

W. E. LEEK SHOOTING REST Jan. 8, 1952 2 SI-IEETS-SHEET 1 Filed Nov. 4, 1949 mm A W A TTORNEQ Jan. 8, 1952 Filed NOV. 4, 1949 OWER REM Y Y L ND A C LINE W. E. LEEK SHOOTING REST 40.105 TA 5L5 TIME DELAY IIELAY N- O. LOS ES AFTER DELAY SLIDE RETURN SOLENOID ABLE SLflCK/IVG SOLENOID 2 SHEETS--SHEET 2 SLIDE S W/TCl-l IN V EN TOR. WA YA/EEL 55% a4 Hfiw y ATTORNEYS Patented Jan. 8, 1952 SHOOTING REST Wayne E. Leek, Ilion, N. Y., assignor to Remingon Arms C mpany, B port 91 a corporation of Delaware Application November 4, 1949, Serial No. 125,553

2 C a ms This invention relates to a shooting rest de:

signed particularly for the casualty test firing of newly manufactured guns.

' It is a well-known fact that guns tested in conventional machine rests where they are locked to a massive structure exhibit entirely different characteristics than they do when fired from the shoulder. These differences are most pronounced with repeating guns, and conventional machine rest testing of autoloading guns is substantially useless.

Since sporting firearms are designed to be fired from the shoulder, the obvious answer would be to employ test shooters to examine and fire all new guns, and this has been the practice particularly where autoloading guns were concerned. Such a course, however, is beset with difficulties. In the first place, newly developed guns are usually subjected to endurance tests which may run to 15,000 rounds per gun or more and an coca-.- sional gun from regular production will be With-.- drawn for a similar endurance test as a check on manufacturing practices. All regular production guns are test fired for 25 or more rounds as a final inspection to determine that they function satisfactorily in all respects. Such a test program takes a tremendous amount of daily shooting and the recoil from a 12-gauge shotgun, for example, is relatively severe. As a result, test shooters firing from the shoulder quickly tire and must be permitted to rest or be shifted to other work at frequent intervals.

Another not so obvious a disadvantage of manual casualty shooting lies in the fact that a hardened casualty shooter holds the gun in a different fashion from the typical hunter, and an automatic gun may function differently in his hands than in the hands of the field user. Further, as the casualty shooter tires, his style of holding and his reaction upon the operation of the gun mechanism changes.

All of these difficulties arise from the fact that no shooter presents a rigid base for .the'

gun. The inevitable motion due to recoil brings into play inertia forces which have a vital effect upon the motion of recoiling parts of the gun proper and upon the feeding and ejection of cartridges therefrom. Unless the conditions of casualty testing substantially duplicate the conditions of field shooting, most of the time and expense devoted to casualty shooting is wasted.

The major object of this invention is the pro,- duction of a shooting rest which is not subject to fatigue and which simulates quite accurately the other reactions of an average human shooter. Asa result. of the achievement of this objective,

casualty shooters are relieved of the physical beating they have taken heretofore and their judgment of gun performance is not clouded by fatigue. Further, the gun operates under standardized conditions duplicating those of field use, facilitating the control of factory operations and the detection of any functional difficulties before the guns get into the hands of the sportingpublic.

In arriving at this invention, it was discovered that these objectives could be realized by fl xib y supportin th su from fo s end nd breech stock as in normal use and opposing recoi thereof by a o binatio o three fa to These factors are I First: The esilient force oppo in c mpresion of an la ti o k which ma be lo ked upon as analogous t h c o hing and flesh a t of the hum n s ou der a d p mi s a proximately the same in tial mo ement o th un.

Second: A. nstan purely f i ional force opposin mov me t of the last bl k relati e to its supportin m n hi fo ce p e rs to be somewhat analo ous to the muscular resistance of a human shoo e to is la m nt o s showd r el ve to th heavy P r i of h s 99 irc he n t a or o osi g mov ment of a mo a ly up t d c m s mass includ n the gun, the elastic block, and the supports there.- for, whi h a be k d u on as an og u t0 the inertia of the torso of the human shooter and has a short movement built up more gradually than the shoulder movement.

To compl te th anal y s i an e eci y p a d e oid means are r vide and arranged to restore the mechanism to its initial position after a time delay sufficient to p mit un t n n o the g ch n sm- The exact nature of the invention, as well as other objects and advantages thereof, will be come apparent from consideration of the following specification referring to the attached drawings, in which:

Fig. 1 is a side ,elevational view partially in section, showing my improved shooting rest. A firearm in testing position is shown in dotted lines and the safety shields provided for the protection of the operator have been removed.

Fig. 2 is a rear elevational view, certain 1111-,- important structural members having been bro.- ken away for clarity in illustration of major working components.

Fi 3 a block t n Wiri ia am Referr n to" the dr in s b hara te s o reference, it will be seen that a main frame 1 s provided with a piv tal su port 2 o wh ch there is mounted a rocker 3 provided in its upper portion with guideways 4, in which there is received a slide 5. The slide supports a saddle 6 in which the buttstock of a gun may be received in contact with a resilient padding 1. From inspection of the drawing it will be noted that the greater portion of the mass of the rocker assembly is concentrated in the region behind the saddle 6 and resilient pad 1. During the swinging movement of the rocker about the pivotal support 2, this greater portion of the mass follows an arcuate path and the whole movement may be considered to be analogous to the rocking of the torso of a shooter about his hip joints. Preferably, to maintain the analogy to the human shooter, the radius of this arcuate path is greater than about twelve inches, and in the example shown in the drawing is substantially twenty inches. An extension 8 from the frame mounts fore-end support springs 9 which are engaged with a cradle in which the foreend of a gun may be received and resiliently retained by the squeezing action of the cradle liner. A pair of links H connect the cradle to the slide 5, constraining these elements to move together in recoil.

A pair of light coil springs l2 are received on telescoping struts l3 and act between the frame I and the rocker 3 to urge a block Ma on the rocker into a position against a resilient stop l4. To prevent any jarring action in the counterrecoil movement, a pair of cylindrical members I are mounted on the frame I and pass through elongated holes H5 in a plate I! secured to the rocker. Each of the members supports a light coil spring l8, acting to oppose the counterrecoil movement and bearing at one end on the frame and, at the other end, upon a friction ring l9 provided with a conical wedging surface engaging a friction piece which has a similar engagement with a second friction ring 2| in contact with the plate 11. It will be seen that these springs oppose the springs l2 and the balance of the forces of the springs should be so adjusted that the rocker will always return readily to its position against the resilient stop 14.

As previously noted, the slide 5 is supported on the rocker 3 in guideways 4, but the freedom of movement of the slide is restricted by'a friction brake arrangement. This brake comprises a friction plate 22 attached to the slide and received between opposed friction shoes 23 faced with brake lining or other suitable material. The friction shoes are adjustably loaded as a result of their engagement between springs 24 and an adjusting screw '25, both secured to the rocker 3. This friction device applies a substantially constant resistance to movement of the slide relative to the rocker and may be pre-set at any desired value.

A cable 26 is attached to the slide and extends over a pulley 21 to the core 28 of a solenoid 29, which has the function of returning the slide to its forward position on the rocker in engagement with the pads 36 at the desired time. A second solenoid 30 is mounted on the frame I with its core 3| positioned to engage and lift the core 28 and slack the cable 26, thus permitting operation of the slide under the sole resistance applied by the friction shoes. As will be more fully explained in a succeeding paragraph, these solenoids are under the control of a normally open switch 32 mounted on the rocker and engageable with a cam 33 on the slide. As the slide recoils, an electrical delay circuit is initiated by the closing of switch 32 and, at a suitable time, actuates solenoid 29 to return the slide and then actuates solenoid 38 to slack the cable when the switch 32 has been again opened by return of the slide. The cable slacking solenoid 3D is mounted on the main frame but the core 28 of the solenoid 29 is, in the absence of current, free to slide in the solenoid and neither solenoid applies any resistance to the initial movement of either slide or rocker under the influence of the firing of a gun.

Referring specifically to Fig. 3, it will be seen that the normally open slide switch 32 is connected to an adjustable time delay relay 34. This time delay relay may be of any convenient normally open circuit type which can be arranged to close the circuit at a suitable adjustable interval after the closing of the switch ,32.

'A General Electric vacuum-tube time delay relay, type CR'7504-A3, has been found satisfactory and the range of available delay time should extend from about milliseconds to one second. In view of the relatively low current handling capacity of such time delay relays, it is preferable to interpose a power relay 35 to actually distribute the power to the solenoids. This relay should be provided with a set of normally open contacts for the solenoid 29 and a set of normally closed contacts for the solenoid 30.

In operation, the recoil of the slide relative to the rocker moves the cam 33, resulting in closing the circuit through switch 32. The closing of this switch initiates the operation of the time delay relay which, after the desired interval, closes its'circuit controlling the power relay. The operation of the power relay sends current through the normally open contacts to the solenoid 29 and by opening the normally closed contacts releases the solenoid 30. Energizing solenoid 29 causes the core 28 to be drawn in, and through the cable the slide is returned to normal position on the rocker. As the slide reaches its normal position, the cam 33 opens switch 32, the relays drop out, and solenoid 30 is energized through the normally closed contacts of power relay 35 to pick up the core 28 of solenoid 29 and slack off the cable 26. With an autoloading shotgun, for example, the time delay relay is set for a delay of about 300 milliseconds, which is ample to insure that the autoloading mechanism has functioned and will not be disturbed by the return movement. Witha manually actuated gun, a period of one-half to one second is desirable to permit manual operation of the gun mechanism.

A study of time displacement curves taken during the firing of typical autoloading shotguns by typical shooters reveals that the movement of the gun during about the first 12 milliseconds is virtually all utilized in compressing the flesh of the human shooter or the analogous pad on the present mechanism. The shoulder or analogous shoulder slide of the present machine commences to move at about 12 milliseconds and at about 20 milliseconds reaches the same rate of displacement as the gun. During the above functioning. the body or the analogous rocker of this invention is slowly accelerated by the pull of the muscles resisting shoulder displacement or the frictional resistance to movement of the slide, although actual movement is slight during the first 20 to 25 milliseconds. The rocker accelerates and friction causes a relative deceleration of the slide so that the two members reach a substantially equal ratein about 50 milliseconds. It is at this 5. time that the recoiling barrel of the shotgun re--v turns toits normal position in the gunmechanism and it seems probable that the transfer of the mo'mentumof the barrel to the slide has infiuenced the movement of the slide. For about the next forty' milliseconds the rocker, slide, and

gun continue to move rearwardly-at a fairly constant rate and another coincidence is noted in that deceleration commences at substantially the time the breech bolt of the gun picks up a shell from the carrier to chamber it in the barrel. The

breech boltdoes not .close completely until about 150. milliseconds. has. elapsed,.a.t whichEtime the rocker has come to rest and started to return to its normal position. By about 300 milliseconds, the rocker has usually returned to its normal position and for an autoloading gun the time delay relay should function at about this time, to return the slide to its normal position. For a manually actuated gun the delay time may advantageously be enough greater to permit operation of the action, 700 milliseconds to one second being usually sufficient.

For purposes of illustration, it may be noted that a device constructed in accordance with this invention to be utilized in testing 12-gauge autoloading shotguns has a total weight of parts supported from the rocker pivot of approximately 50 pounds. The rocker return spring may be overcome by the exertion of from 3 to 5 pounds of force. The friction shoes of this illustrative unit are set to allow the slide, which weighs pounds or less, to move relative to the rocker when 16 to 18 pounds of force are exerted. Under operat ing conditions, the slide may be expected to be displaced on the rocker about two inches and the upper end of the rocker to be moved rearwardly about one and three-quarters inches, making a total displacement of the gun buttstock of about three and three-quarters inches. These displacements were obtained in time substantially the same as the illustrative times referred to in the preceding paragraph. When these displacements of the gun, as supported by this invention, are plotted against time and compared to a similar curve obtained from the typical human shoulder, they are found to be almost identical.

It will be seen that insofar as gun movement and timing are concerned, this invention provides a support closely approximating that of the human shoulder. Moreover, this device does not get tired and may be set to provide constant duplicable conditions at any time. Further, when it is found that a particular type of malfunction is occurring in field tests of a new product by certain individuals, the particular conditions can be readily set up and enough tests fired to determine and correct the trouble.

Although a specific form of my invention has been shown and discussed in considerable detail, I do not consider that my invention is limited to this particular embodiment. For an exact statement of the limitations upon the scope of my invention, reference may be made to the claims appearing herein.

I claim:

1. A shooting rest comprising a base; an inertia mass supported on said base for recoiling movement away from a normal position on said base; a member mounted on said mass and movable by recoil with respect to the mass along a path substantially coincident with the path of movement of said mass and away from a nor- 6. mal position on said mass; friction brake means engaged between the member and the mass resisting relative movement thereof; a resilient body engaged with said member; and means to flexibly support a gun for shooting with its buttstock in recoil force transmitting engagement only with the resilient body, whereby the force of recoil will be transmitted from the gun through said resilient body to said member and from said member through said friction brake means to said inertia mass.

2. A shooting rest as described in claim 1, including means to return said mass to said normal position after firing. v

3. A shooting rest as described in claim 2, including means inoperative during departure of said member from normal position to return said member to normal position on said mass after firing.

4. A shooting rest as described in claim 3, said means to return the member comprising electrical solenoid means operated from an external source of power.

5. A shooting rest as described in claim 4, including a switch mounted on said mass; a switch operator on said member arranged to operate said switch when the member departs from said normal position; electrical time delay relay means actuated by said switch, said relay means being connected between said source of power and said solenoid to control the transmission of power to said solenoid, the time delay being such as to delay the application of power to said solenoid means until after the gun mechanism has completed functioning.

6. A shooting rest as described in claim 1, said mass being swingably mounted to move the portion thereof aligned with said resilient body in an arcuate path of radius greater than twelve inches.

'7. A shooting rest as described in claim 6, including light spring means arranged to return said mass to normal position; relatively lighter spring means arranged to oppose said return; and friction brake means associated with said lighter spring means to regulate the rate of said return.

8. .A shooting rest as described in claim 7, said member being mounted for rectilinear movement on said swingably mounted mass and provided with a friction plate movable with the member; and adjustable friction shoes mounted on said mass in engagement with said friction plate to frictionally oppose rectilinear movement of the member on said mass.

9. A shooting rest as described in claim 8, including a pull-in solenoid mounted on the mass; a core in said solenoid coupled to said member and pulled thereby partially out of said solenoid when said member departs from normal position on said mass, said core being pulled back into the solenoid to restore the member to normal position when the solenoid is energized.

10. A shooting rest as described in claim 9, said core being coupled to the member by a flexible cable, said rest including a second solenoid having a core arranged to return the core of said first solenoid from its energized position to a normal rest position and thereby slack said flexible cable.

11. A shooting rest as described in claim 10, including electrical control means actuated by departure of said member from normal position on said mass to energize said first solenoid for returning said member to normal position after the gun has fired and actuated by return of said member to normal position on said mass to deenergize said first solenoid and energize said second solenoid to free said member from restraint by the core of the first solenoid after the member has been returned to normal position.

12. A shooting rest as described in claim 11, said electrical control means including a switch; an operator for said switch constructed and arranged to operate said switch in response to displacement of said member from normal position on said mass, and an adjustable time delay relay started in time delay operation by operation of said switch and arranged to energize said first solenoid to return said member and de- REFERENCES CITED The following references are of record in the file of this patent:

UNITED STATES PATENTS Number Name Date 1,367,353 Craig Feb. 1, 1921 2,378,545 Fraser et a1 June 19, 1945

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1367353 *Apr 30, 1919Feb 1, 1921Craig Alvin MTesting-machine
US2378545 *Jun 30, 1943Jun 19, 1945Underwood Elliott Fisher CoMethod of and apparatus for testing guns and correcting gun sights
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2729975 *Jun 9, 1952Jan 10, 1956Hawthorne Herman FVariable recoil mount
US2731829 *Jan 29, 1954Jan 24, 1956 Pistol mount for shooting tests
US3024653 *Jan 23, 1961Mar 13, 1962Broadway Buford LFirearm testing device
US3041938 *Jul 19, 1960Jul 3, 1962Seabrook John TGun rest with magnetic holding means
US4545144 *Jul 16, 1982Oct 8, 1985Schuster Philip CShooters table
US4621563 *Nov 5, 1984Nov 11, 1986Sure Shot Of Louisiana, Inc.Apparatus for aligning gun sights
US4924616 *Mar 24, 1989May 15, 1990Bell Ross APortable firearm rest
US5272955 *Jul 17, 1992Dec 28, 1993Bond Robert LGun aiming device for a wheelchair
US5375804 *May 6, 1993Dec 27, 1994Levilly; PhilippePortable device for immobilizing individual firearms during adjustment firing
US5811720 *Jun 16, 1997Sep 22, 1998Quinnell; Glenn D.Shooting rest with recoil reduction system
US6338218 *Nov 16, 1999Jan 15, 2002Sam J. HeglerApparatus for supporting a firearm
US7188445 *May 13, 2005Mar 13, 2007Lehman Kenneth JCantilevered gun rest
US7878105 *Apr 2, 2008Feb 1, 2011Grinnell MoreMitigating recoil in a ballistic robot
US8082836Dec 16, 2010Dec 27, 2011Irobot CorporationMitigating recoil in a ballistic robot
US8245432 *Oct 22, 2009Aug 21, 2012Jerry LetsonAdjustable recoil reducing shooting rest
US8281703Dec 22, 2011Oct 9, 2012Irobot CorporationMitigating recoil in a ballistic robot
US8296988Nov 30, 2006Oct 30, 2012Battenfeld Technologies, Inc.Firearm supporting devices, methods of assembling firearm supporting devices, and methods of packaging firearm supporting devices
US8356442Mar 13, 2012Jan 22, 2013Battenfeld Technologies, Inc.Adjustable shooting rests and shooting rest assemblies
US8393106Jul 14, 2011Mar 12, 2013Battenfeld Technologies, Inc.Shooting rests with adjustable height for supporting firearms
US8464628Oct 29, 2010Jun 18, 2013Battenfeld Technologies, Inc.Attachment mechanisms for coupling firearms to supporting structures
US8621773May 10, 2006Jan 7, 2014Battenfeld Technologies, Inc.Shooting rests for supporting firearms
US8931201Dec 20, 2013Jan 13, 2015Battenfeld Technologies, Inc.Gun support apparatus
US20110094140 *Oct 22, 2009Apr 28, 2011Jerry LetsonAdjustable Recoil Reducing Shooting Rest
US20120011759 *Jan 19, 2011Jan 19, 2012Battenfeld Technologies, Inc.Recoil-reducing shooting rest
U.S. Classification89/44.1, 73/73, 42/94, 89/37.4
International ClassificationF41A23/00, F41A23/16
Cooperative ClassificationF41A23/16
European ClassificationF41A23/16