|Publication number||US2614913 A|
|Publication date||Oct 21, 1952|
|Filing date||Oct 20, 1950|
|Priority date||Oct 20, 1950|
|Publication number||US 2614913 A, US 2614913A, US-A-2614913, US2614913 A, US2614913A|
|Inventors||Prance Stanley R, Reindl Harold J|
|Original Assignee||Gen Motors Corp|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (5), Referenced by (19), Classifications (8)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Patented Oct. 21, 1952 BRIGHTENING BATH Harold 'J. Reindl and Stanley R. Prance, Dayton,
Ohio, assignors to General Motors Corporation, Detroit, Mich., a corporation of Delaware NoDrawing. Application October 20, 1950, Serial No. 191,324
I This invention relates to chemical dipping processes and is particularly directed to dipping processes for brightening the surface of aluminum and/or aluminum alloys.
It is, therefore, a primary object of theinvent1on to provide a chemical brightening bathfor use in connection with aluminum and/or alumia chemical brightening bath for use in connection with aluminum and/or aluminum alloys which has substantial brightening effects when using very low concentrations of the chemicals therein, said bath being of a substantially watery I consistency that minimizes drag-out loss and which facilitates rinsing.
Further obiects will be apparent from the following description. I
The use of nitric acid-hydrofluoric acid baths for brightening aluminum and/or aluminum alloys is well known in the art, such baths create numerous industrial hazards and problems through the use of the hydrofluoric acid per se. On the other hand, nitric acid-hydrofluoric acid baths, clue to the strong conjoint action of the specific acids, may be used in quite dilute condition which minimizes other production problems, for example, drag-out loss and likewise makes the rinsin of the brightened articles a relatively easy, matter as compared with the usual syrupy phosphoric acid type of brightening baths.
Due to the strength of a nitric acid-hydrofluoric acid combination and the ability to use such a combination in low concentrations, the cost of the bath is reduced. mak ng a bath of this type very desirable commercially.
copper fluoride, etc, silver or gold salts, etc., plus a brightener such as ethylene glycol. These in- 7 Claims. (01. 4142) gredients may be contained in a stainless steel tank and will have excellent brightening action on aluminum and/or aluminum alloys. In fact, the action will be greatly improved over a bath utilizing nitric acid and hydrofluoric acid per se. Furthermore, we have found that the use of ammonium bifluoride extends the life of the: bath in addition to yielding improved results from a brightening standpoint. In all cases, the-ammonium salt of the hydrofluoric acid either as a fluoride or bifluoride gives improved results over the use of hydrofluoric acid per se even when the hydrofluoric acid is combined with other ingredients to form a salt in situ within the solution. In this connection, the improved result is probably due to the fact that the addition of ammonium fluoride or ammonium bifluoride to the bath yields the ammonium salt ofthe hydrofluoric acid in complete combinationwith no free hydrofluoric acid nor free ammonium hydroxide or other combining reagent present. If hydrofluoric acid per se is added to the bath,its combining action with other ingredients to yield salts is never complete unless definite molar quantities of all ingredients are added to assure complete reaction. Obviously, this is impossible in a commercial operation and therefore there is always an excess of the hydrofluoric acid or an Range Preferred Percent Percent Commercial nitric acid 2. 0 -7. 5 3. Ammonium bifiuoride .30 .75 65 Ethylene glvcol .40 l. 0 .60 Ohromic acid (ClOs) .30 75 .65 Soluble metallic salt (copper nitrate).. .002- .05 0025 Water Remainder Remainder This bath may be modified by using cane sugar dissolved in the bath in place of ethylene glycol within the range of 20% to 1.0% with a 30% preferred and similarly ammonium fluoride may be used in place of ammonium bifluoride within the same ranges. The bath is made up with water as a base and is operated at an elevated temperature, for example, in the order of F. to 212 F. The aluminum parts to be brightened are cleaned so as to be free from grease and are then immersed in the hot brightening bath for a period ranging from 3 to 5 minutes depending upon the finish desired, after which they are removed from the bath and thoroughly rinsed in water to remove many traces of the bath therefrom. They may then be dried by preferably dipping in hot water, followed by an air dry With or Without air blast.
We have found that a brightening bat of the character described herein has good life and that the drag-out loss, due to the low Viscosity of the watery solution, is maintained at a minimum. In order to keep the bath at an operatinglevel, We add additional ingredients periodically .during use as needed (this may bedetermined by the brightness of the parts being treated or by analysis of bath concentrations) in the'following concentrations: for each square foot of surface brightened We add in the order of 8.5 cc..nitric acid, .75 gram of ammonium bifiuoride and .75cc. of ethylene-'glycolor .4 gram .of sugar. Water may be added simultaneouslytomaintain the level of the bath to a givenpoint within the brightening tank.
It is to be, pointed out here that our improvements over prior art type of brighteners are directed to the use of ammonium fiuorideand particularly to the use of ammonium bifluoride together with the addition of ethylene glycol or sugar as a brightener. These improvements yield a better brightening solution. for .thefollowing reasons:
1. The brightening action of the bath is better;
2.,The control oithe bath is moreeasily maintained;
.3. The commercial hazards .of the bathare minimized; and
4. The costof the .bathlisreduced.
WhiIethe embodiments of the .present'invention as herein disclosed, constitute preferred forms, it is to be understood that other iorms might be adopted.
gredients ammonium bifluoride to ..75%,. nitric-acid 2.0% to 7.5%, chromic acid 30% to .75% and ethyleneglycol A092; .to 1.0% and wherein water makes upsubstantially .the.re-
mainder of the bath.
2. A bath as claimed in claiml with:the...added ingredient of a salt oi a metalbelow hydrogen in the electro-chemical series, .002% to 05% 3. A brightening bath for use in connection ,with aluminum and/or aluminum alloys Wherein the brightening is carried out at a temperature varying between 185 F. to 212 F. consisting of a solution having as its basic ingredients ammonium bifluoride nitric acid 3.75%, chromic acid .65% and ethylene glycol .60% together with water which makes up substantially the remainder of the bath.
i. A brightening bath for use .in-.connection with aluminum and/or aluminum alloys Wherein the brightening is carried out at a temperature varying between 185 F. to 212 F. for a .periodranging from 3 to 5 minutes, consisting of; an aqueous solution having as its basic ingredients ammonium bifluoride .65%, nitric acid ..3.75%,..chromic acid 55%, ethylene glycol .60%
together with traces of copper nitrate.
.5. Abrightening bath for use in connection with'aluminum and/or aluminum alloys Wherein thebrightening is carried out at a temperature varying between 185. -F. to 212 F. consisting of; a solutionhaving as its basic ingredients ammonium'bifiuoride 550% to nitricacid 2.0% 'to 7.5%, chromic acid.;30% to .75% and cane sugar 20% to 1.0% and wherein water makes up substantially Lthe remainder of :the
6. A brightening bath .for use in connection with aluminum and/or aluminum alloys wherein the brightening is carried out at atemperature varying between.185 F. to 212 F. consisting of; a solution having as its basic ingredients ammonium bifiuoride 465%;nitric acidf3'.75%, chromic acid .65%'and cane sugar 30% together with water which makes'up 'substantially'the remainder of the bath.
7. A brightening bath foruse in "connection with aluminum and/or aluminum'alloyswherein the brightening is carried out at a'temperature varying between 185 F. to '212"F.fora period ranging from'3 to ,5 minutes, consisting of; an aqueous solution having as its basic ingredients ammonium bifiuoride ;65%,'nitriciacid 3.75%, chromic acid .65'%, cane sugar together with traces of coppernitrate.
HAROLD J. REINDL. STANLEY R. PR-ANCE.
I REFERENCES CITED The following references are of record in the file of this patent:
UNITED. STATES PATENTS Number Name Date 590,966 Cornwall Oct. 5,1897 "2,168,909 Mason Aug."8, 1939 2,393,875 Van Dusen Jan; 29, 1946 2,415,724 Beall Feb.'11,'1947 2,507,314 Mason May '9, 1950
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US590965 *||Jun 21, 1897||Oct 5, 1897||Galvanizing-machine|
|US2168909 *||Dec 1, 1936||Aug 8, 1939||Aluminum Co Of America||Producing etched surfaces on aluminum|
|US2393875 *||May 29, 1944||Jan 29, 1946||Addressograph Multigraph||Method of etching and dampening planographic printing plates and repellent solution t herefor|
|US2415724 *||Nov 6, 1939||Feb 11, 1947||Beall Frank H||Chromium plating|
|US2507314 *||Mar 31, 1943||May 9, 1950||Aluminum Co Of America||Method of treating aluminum surfaces|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2711364 *||Dec 31, 1953||Jun 21, 1955||Beach John G||Polishing metals and composition therefor|
|US2738259 *||Feb 24, 1954||Mar 13, 1956||Raytheon Mfg Co||Surface treatment of germanium|
|US2746849 *||Feb 18, 1953||May 22, 1956||Heinrich Neunzig||Method of imparting high brilliancy to articles made of aluminum and its alloys|
|US2756131 *||Aug 18, 1953||Jul 24, 1956||Vaw Ver Aluminium Werke Ag||Method for glossing articles made of aluminum and particularly pure aluminum and its alloys|
|US2763536 *||May 20, 1953||Sep 18, 1956||Dow Chemical Co||Etching|
|US2796334 *||Feb 23, 1955||Jun 18, 1957||Aluminum Co Of America||Etching aluminum|
|US2828193 *||Aug 9, 1954||Mar 25, 1958||Turco Products Inc||Method for rejuvenation of aluminum treating solutions|
|US2847286 *||Dec 20, 1955||Aug 12, 1958||Vaw Ver Aluminium Werke Ag||Method of forming a glossy surface|
|US2977204 *||Aug 14, 1959||Mar 28, 1961||Donald W Shannon||Method of improving corrosion resistance of zirconium|
|US3018211 *||Jan 26, 1959||Jan 23, 1962||Purex Corp Ltd||Composition and process for brightening aluminum and its alloys|
|US3060071 *||Aug 6, 1957||Oct 23, 1962||Allied Res Products Inc||Process of treating zinc castings|
|US3078203 *||Oct 20, 1958||Feb 19, 1963||Gen Motors Corp||Method of etching ferrous alloy and composition|
|US3150007 *||Aug 2, 1954||Sep 22, 1964||Kovachy Julius M||Process for cleaning stone|
|US3230172 *||Apr 6, 1962||Jan 18, 1966||Montedison Spa||Pickling bath for stainless steel and process for the preparation thereof|
|US3296141 *||Mar 25, 1965||Jan 3, 1967||R O Hull & Company Inc||Bright dip compositions for the treatment of steel|
|US4673521 *||Jan 21, 1986||Jun 16, 1987||Enthone, Incorporated||Process for regenerating solder stripping solutions|
|US8668840 *||Apr 9, 2008||Mar 11, 2014||Altis Semiconductor||Solution used in the fabrication of a porous semiconductor material, and a method of fabricating said material|
|US20080268652 *||Apr 9, 2008||Oct 30, 2008||Bruno Delahaye||Solution used in the fabrication of a porous semiconductor material, and a method of fabricating said material|
|WO1987004451A1 *||Jan 7, 1987||Jul 30, 1987||Enthone||Process for regenerating solder stripping solutions|
|U.S. Classification||252/79.3, 510/257, 134/3, 216/104|
|International Classification||C23F3/03, C23F3/00|