Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2618151 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateNov 18, 1952
Filing dateOct 7, 1948
Priority dateOct 7, 1948
Publication numberUS 2618151 A, US 2618151A, US-A-2618151, US2618151 A, US2618151A
InventorsLeas William J
Original AssigneeStandard Oil Dev Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Cell for measuring relative permeability
US 2618151 A
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

NOV. 18, 1952 w, J, L s 2,618,151

CELL FOR MEASURING RELATIVE EERMEABILITY Filed Oct. 7, 1948 2 SHEETSSHEET 1 20 I 20 22 21 /7 Jam 4 .44). I A '///////W Poro us D/scs Nov. 18, 1952 i w. s 2,618,151

CELL FOR MEASURING RELATIVE PERMEABILITY Filed Qqp. 7, 194a 2 SHEETS-SHEET 2 Pressure Sourc flow meter pump fidnoi ne [er 4/ 49 Manomezer Flow meter Pump Patented Nov. 18, 1952 CELL FOR MEASURING RELATIVE PERMEABILI'IY William J. Leas, Tulsa, Okla., assignor to Standan! Oil Development Company, a corporation of Delaware Application October 7, 1948, Serial No. 53,352

This invention relates to an apparatus for determining the relative permeability of earth formations to gases and liquids, and more particularly relates to a unique type of cell for holdin an earth or rock sample for the purpose of making such measurement of relative permeability.

During the drilling of wells and in the course of prospecting for oil, core samples of the earth formations traversed are taken to determine the nature thereof. From the measured permeabilityof a reservoir rock it is possible for a petroleumengineer to calculate with some degree of accuracy the rate at which the oil well may produce.

Heretoiore measurements of permeability -of rock samples to various fluids have been made by mounting the test specimen in a suitable holder and measuring the rate of fluid flow through the specimen under various pressure gradients. However, with the procedures employed it is possible to measure the permeability with only one fluid at a time. It is often desirable to know what the probable flow rate of one fluid through the rock will be in the presence of a second fluid or, in other words, what the relative permeability of the rock is to one fluid with respect to the concentration of that fluid in the rock. Since it is not possible to calculate this from observed measurements of permeability to individual fluids as determined by prior procedures it is highly desirable to have a method of making actual measurements of permeability to one fluid in the presence of a second fluid. Knowledge of the relative permeability of an oil bearing stratum with respect to the fluid concentration in that stratum is of considerable importance in the study of oil reservoirs since it gives the engineer valuable information regarding the behavior of fluids in flow. This information is of considerable help in determining just how. rapidly a fluid will flow through a formation under the condi tions present therein.

It is an object of the present invention to provide a simple apparatus for determining the relative permeability of an earth formation to a plurality of fluids by appropriate tests on a sample core taken from the formation in question. Other and further objects of this invention will be apparent from the ensuing description and from the accompanying drawings.

Briefly, this invention relates to an improved apparatus for determining the relative permeability of a core sample to gas and oil and to a cell for accomplishing this purpose. Essentially, this cell comprises rigid non-porous end walls. a flexible non-porous side wall, porous discs adapted to be placed at each end of the rock sample contained in the cell, non-porous discs 2 Claims. (01. 7338) 2 adapted to be placed in the cell between th porous discs and the end walls of the cell, means for conducting one fluid into the cell into direct contact with the core sample, means for conducting a second fluid to the exterior side of one of the porous discs and means for-removing fluid from the cell.

In the drawings, Fig. 1 represents a cross section view of one embodiment of an assembled cell according to the present invention. Fig. 2 depicts a top view of one of the end plates of the cell shown in Fig. 1. Figs. 3 and 4 show details of one design that may be employed for the porous and/or non-porous discs of Fig. 1. An alternative design of non-porous disc is shown in Figs. 5 and 6. Fig. 7 presents a schematic diagram of a complete assembly of apparatus for determining relative permeability when employing the improved sample cell of the present invention.

Referring particularly to Fig. 1, numeral I refers to a barrel member, which is preferably of cylindrical form, having a lateral outlet tube 2. Fitted into the interior of the barrel member is a rubber sleeve 4 which laps over the'ends of the barrel member. At each end of the barrel and sleeve assembly are placed end plates 5 and 8 which thus constitute the top and bottom of the assembled cell. These plates are preferably circular in shape although square or rectangular shapes may also be used. Each of these plates has a plurality of flow tube openings into which may be fltted flow tubes H. l2, l3 and I4. These end plates may also have a number of holes for receiving bolts for the purpose of holding the assembled cell together. The barrel member and end plates are preferably made of metal.

Disposed within the cylindrical opening formed by the elastic sleeve 4 inside of barrel member I are porous discs 1 and 8 having openings adapted to receive the ends of flow tubes H and I2 respectively. Porous discs I and 8 are adapted to hold between them a rock sample or core 3 which is to be subjected to test. Lying within the cell between porous disc 1 and end plate 5 and immediately adjacent to porous plate I is a nonporous backin disc 9 which is provided with openings for receiving flow tubes II and I3. Similarly. non-porous disc I0 is placed between porous disc 8 and end plate 6 and has holes adapted to receive flow tubes l2 and It. It will be seen that porous discs I and 8 and nonporous backing discs 9 and '0 are of substantially the same diameter as core 3. Flow tubes II and I2 may be cemented in place in porous discs I and 8 or they may be held in place with washers or O-ring gaskets l1 and I8 which may be made of rubber or similar elastic material. When the latter washers are used, suitable grooves are pro- 3 vided in backing discs 9 and ID for holding these washers or gaskets,

In the assembled apparatus flow tube II is inserted through the appropriate openings in end plate 5, backing disc 3, and porous disc 1 so that face of porous disc 8. Tubes H and I3 and I2 and II are preferably soldered to plates 9 and Ill respectively when these latter are made of metal, which is the preferred material. If non-metallic plates 9 and in are used the various tubes may be held in place with a suitable cement. In order to provide for a snug fit of porous discs I and 8 against the ends of core sample 3, elastic washers l9 may be inserted between the backing disc 9 and end plate 5. Such a snug fit is desirable so that porous discs I and B will be pressed against the ends of core sample 3 with suflicient force to establish the proper amount of capillary contact. The use of the elastic washers l9 has the further advantage of correcting any lack of parallelness in the two ends of the core sample.

Fig. 2 presents a top view of end plate 5 of Fig. 1 and shows a suggested distribution of flow tube holes and also of holes for receiving bolts to hold the assembled cell together. Corresponding holes will, of course, be drilled in the opposite end plate 6 when the cell is to be held together by this means. For mechanical reasons, an odd number of bolt holes is usually preferred. Alternatively, the assembled cell could be held together without the use of bolts by placing it in a vise or similar clamping mechanism.

The porous discs I and 8 may have plane flat faces as shown in Fig. l or they may be designed with grooves to facilitate flow of fluids. Fig. 4 presentsone form of porous discs that may be employed in the cell of this invention and, in the particular embodiment shown, presents the side of disc I that will be immediately adjacent the core sample in the assembled cell. In this figure are shown rectangular grooves 20 which direct the flow of fluid toward the opening adapted to receive flow tube ll. Fig. 3 shows the same 'disc in cross section through the line IIII]I of Fig. 4.

The same design can be used for backing disc 9 As to the practical dimensions of the perme-l ability cell these may be of any suitable magnitude and it is, of course, not intended that the invention be limited in any manner by the size of the cell employed. Normally, however, the cell will be constructed to accommodate a core of about an inch to an inch and one-half in diameter and up to about three inches'in length. Ordinarily a core of. about one inch diameter and one inch in normally it is-desired to measure the horizontal permeability of the formation.

The metal parts of the cell can be fabricated from any suitable material such as steel, brass or aluminum. The flow tubes i I, I2 etc. can be made of either metal, glass or plastic, although metal is the more practical. A convenient size for these tubes is about /8 inch outside diameter. With respect to the porous plates or discs 'I and 8. these may be of about inch to A inch thickness and are ordinarily fabricated from ceramic material. The pores of the plates should have a radius from 0.1 to about 10 microns and the most useful range of pore radii will be found to be from about 1 to about 6 microns. If the pore size is too large a proper pressure differential between the two fluids in the-cell cannot be readily maintained. On the other hand if the pore size is too small the permeability of the porous disc will be reduced to the point that no appreciable quantity of liquid can be made'to flow through them.

- In assembling the cell the core can be inserted most conveniently by evacuating the annular space between core barrel I and elastic sleeve 4, thus causing the sleeve to be held against the inside of the barrel by atmospheric pressure. After the cell has been assembled with the core in place, pressure can be applied to the sides of the core 3 by introducing a liquid through tube 2 into the annular space between the barrel l and the elastic sleeve 4. A liquid which does not react with the barrel I or the sleeve d is employed for this purpose in order to minimize diffusion of gases through the elastic sleeve. Mercury is one suitable liquid for this purpose.

In Fig. 7 is presented a diagram of a complete setup of apparatus for employingthe sample cell of the present invention in the determination of relative permeabilities.

In this figure the assembled cell of Fig. 1 is indicated by reference numeral 30 and the flow tubes ll, l2, I3 and M by the same numeralsas in Fig.,1. Flow tubes l3 and M are connected by suitable flow lines to manometer 4|. Flow tube [3 is connected by another flow line to one side of fiowmeter 42. The other side of fiowmeter 42 is connected to pump 49 which in turn is connected through a flow line to tube It. Connected to the latter flow line between tube l4 and pump 49 is a calibrated tube 54.

In similar manner flow tubes H and 12 are connected to manometer 3| and to fiowmeter 32 and pump 39. The line leading from flow tube l2 to pump 39 is connected by suitable means to manometer 58. One leg of manometer 58 is connected to a source of pressure 59.

For the purposes of illustration, the portion of the system in Fig. '7 which embraces pump 49, manometer 4i and fiowmeter 42 will be designated as phase A, which is a liquid phase. Likewise portion of the system embracing pump 39, manometer 3| and fiowmeter 32 will be designated as phase B, which is a gas phase. In order to simplify the description of the operationstill further, water will be employed to illustrate phase A and air to illustrate phase B. In using the apparatus the core 3 and the two porous discs I and 8 are the first saturated with water and then placed in the permeability cell, employing the technique described above for inserting the core. Then air pressure (capillary pressure) is applied from pressure source 59 suiiicient to displace a portion of the liquid from the core this pressure being measured by manometer 58. For example, 3 pounds per square inch will displace about 20 per cent of the water. Calibrated tube 54 can be used for measuring the amount of liquid thus displaced. Then pump 39 is placed in operation and regulated to give a pressure differential across the core of about 0.03 pound per square inch as measured by manometer 3|. The amount of air flowing through the core under these conditions is then measured by flowmeter 32.

In the same manner, using the same pressure of 3 pounds per square inch from pressure source 89, the flow of liquid phase A through the core is determined by operating pump 49 to give a pressure differential across the core of about 0.03 pound per square inch as measured by manometer 4! and measuring the rate of flow of the liquid by means of flowmeter 42. Similar rates of flow for both gas and liquid are then obtained with greater pressures in the system from pressure source 59. To determine the relative permeability oi the core to phase B at any given capillary pressure it is merely necessary to divide the rate of flow obtained with that pressure by the rate of flow obtained when the core is 100 per cent saturated.

Although water has been used to illustrate the operation of the apparatus the liquid or wetting phase A may be any other wetting fluid such as decane or a mineral oil. Likewise, the non-wetting phase B may be any gas such as air or natural gas or the like or it may also be a liquid. When measuring relative permeabilities with two fluid phases. phase A is always the phase which preferentially wets the core. Thus when water and oil are employed, water will be. phase A and oil will be phase 3, since the core will be preferentially wet by water. Likewise, oil will be the wetting phase with respect to gas.

By permitting the two phases to flow simultaneously in the same direction through the cell it is possible to simulate reservoir conditions in which oil and gas are flowing toward a well. Conditions existing in gravity drainage can be simulated :by causing the two phases to flow in opposite directions through the cell.

Referring back to Fig. 1, the construction of the cell can be modified to some extent without departing from the basic principle of the invention. For example, in an alternative construction of the cell, tube II can be omitted, in which event backing disc 9 and end plate 5 will each be provided with one less flow tube opening and porous disc I will have no flow tube openings. In this modification of the invention, tubes I3 and I4 will serve as entrance and exit tubes for phase A. .Phase B can then be introduced through tube 12. The procedure otherwise is substantially as has been described when using a cell having four tubes as indicated in Fig. 1. As phase B is introduced through tube l2 the core becomes partially saturated with phase B and the saturation with respect to phase A is correspondingly reduced. The percentage of phases A and B will be round to be a function 01' the diiierences in pressure of the two phases. This diflerence in pressure is maintained at a given value and the rate of flow of phase A is measured by means of a flowmeter as described in connection with Fig. 7. Similar measurements of rate of flow of phase A are obtained at other levels of pressure differences of phases A and B and from the information thus obtained one can calculate the relative permeability of the core to phase A as a function of the degree to which the core has been saturated by phase A.

Other related uses of the permeability cell of the present invention will occur to those skilled in this particular art and it is not intended that this invention be limited by the particular illustrations given but only by the following claims.

What is claimed is:

1. A cell for determining the relative permeability of a, rock sample to a plurality of fluids which comprises a pair of end plates each provided with a plurality of flow tube openings, a barrel member held by the said end plates, an elastic sleeve inserted in said barrel member and defining therewith an annular space, the ends of said sleeves lapping over the ends of the barrel member; means for clamping together the assembly of said end plates, elastic sleeve and barrel member, a pair of porous discs disposed within the enclosure formed by said sleeve and said end plates and adapted to fit at each end of said enclosure so as to hold between them a cylindrical rock sample, at least one of said discs being provided with at least one flow tube opening, a pair of non-porous backing discs each adapted to be placed in said enclosure between one of said porous discs and one of said end plates, each non-porous disc being provided with at least one flow tube opening, said porous and non-porous discs having diameters substantially equal to that of said rock sample, a fluid inlet tube communicating with the annular space between said barrel member and said elastic sleeve adapted to conduct fluid into said annular space for the purpose of pressing said sleeve against the sides of said rock sample and against the edges of said porous and non-porous discs, and a plurality of flow tubes, at least one pair of which are adapted to pass through the flow tube openings in said end plates and in said non-porous backing discs so as to communicate directly with the exterior sides of said porous discs, and at least one flow tube being adapted to pass through flow tube openings in said end plates and in said non-porous backing discs so as to communicate directly with said rock sample.

2. A cell according to claim 1 having two pairs of flow tubes, one pair being adapted to pass through flow tube openings in said end plates,

said non-porous discs and said porous discs so as to communicate directly with said rock sample, and the other pair being adapted to pass through flow tube openings in said end plates and in said non-porous discs so as to communicate directly with the exteriorsides a: said porous discs.


REFERENCES CITED The following references are oi record in the file of this patent:

UNITED STATES PATENTS Number Name Date 2,345,935 Hassler Apr. 4, 1944 2,465,948 Welge Mar. 29, 1949 2,534,718 Leas Dec. 19. 1950

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2345935 *Apr 6, 1942Apr 4, 1944Shell DevMethod and apparatus for permeability measurements
US2465948 *Aug 20, 1946Mar 29, 1949Standard Oil Dev CoCore porosity analysis and apparatus therefor
US2534718 *Jun 14, 1947Dec 19, 1950Standard Oil Dev CoReversible displacement cell
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2705418 *Dec 30, 1950Apr 5, 1955Socony Vacuum Oil Co IncApparatus for measuring charateristics of core samples under compressive stresses
US2755660 *Jun 12, 1953Jul 24, 1956State University Of IowaPermeability tester
US2842958 *Jan 27, 1956Jul 15, 1958Pure Oil CoApparatus for measuring flow characteristics of porous specimens by displacement
US2861451 *Nov 29, 1954Nov 25, 1958Sheffield CorpFluid leakage gauging device
US3139747 *Jul 3, 1961Jul 7, 1964Continental Oil CoFlow regulator
US3482787 *Feb 13, 1969Dec 9, 1969Holderbank CementRegulating device on a grinding arrangement
US3577767 *Nov 24, 1969May 4, 1971Beloit CorpFelt permeability testing apparatus
US4506542 *Apr 22, 1983Mar 26, 1985Chandler Engineering CompanyApparatus and procedure for relative permeability measurements
US4561289 *Sep 14, 1984Dec 31, 1985Marathon Oil CompanyPerforated end plug plate for testing core samples
US4573342 *Sep 14, 1984Mar 4, 1986Marathon Oil CompanyApparatus and method for the automatic porosity and permeability testing of multiple core samples
US4649737 *Nov 7, 1985Mar 17, 1987Marathon Oil CompanyApparatus and method for automatic testing of core samples
US4753107 *Mar 10, 1986Jun 28, 1988Reed Ross ECore holder
US4791822 *May 20, 1987Dec 20, 1988Stim Lab, Inc.Cell assembly for determining conductivity and permeability
US4922758 *Aug 17, 1988May 8, 1990Stim Lab, Inc.Cell assembly for determining conductivity and permeability
US5018396 *Nov 13, 1989May 28, 1991Stim Lab, Inc.Cell assembly for determining conductivity and permeability
US5307694 *May 18, 1992May 3, 1994Texaco Inc.Sample holder for hydrous pyrolysis operations
US5363692 *Sep 17, 1990Nov 15, 1994Institut Francais Du PetroleDevice and method for evaluating the ability of a body containing a product to expel the product from the body
US5544520 *Feb 10, 1995Aug 13, 1996Sandia CorporationBridge permeameter
US6055850 *Dec 24, 1997May 2, 2000Turner; Daniel R.Multi-directional permeameter
US6178808 *Aug 12, 1999Jan 30, 2001Wisconsin Alumni Research FoundationApparatus and method for testing the hydraulic conductivity of geologic materials
US8474313Mar 23, 2010Jul 2, 2013Saudi Arabian Oil CompanyProcess for testing a sample of hydraulic fracturing fluid
US20100089124 *Sep 25, 2009Apr 15, 2010North Dakota State UniversityIntegrated porous rigid wall and flexible wall permeability test device for soils
US20110290012 *Aug 20, 2008Dec 1, 2011Jappy Trevor GMethod and apparatus for fluid loss measurements of wellbore fluids
DE2825893A1 *Jun 13, 1978Jan 4, 1979Usm CorpVerfahren zum versteifen einer ausgewaehlten flaeche eines schuhschaftes
U.S. Classification73/38
International ClassificationG01N15/08
Cooperative ClassificationG01N15/0826
European ClassificationG01N15/08C1