Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2645937 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJul 21, 1953
Filing dateOct 28, 1949
Priority dateOct 28, 1949
Publication numberUS 2645937 A, US 2645937A, US-A-2645937, US2645937 A, US2645937A
InventorsMckee Robert C, Root Carleton H, Skalmusky Marvin F
Original AssigneePaper Chemistry Inst
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method of testing sheet materials
US 2645937 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

y 21, 1953 T M. F. SKALMUSKY ErAL 2,545,937

METHOD OF TESTING SHEET MATERIALS Filed Oct. 28, 1949 fizz e/72 02:; 77X. 8 dx a/mzafy far/91272 ff (Woof Patented July 21, 1953 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE METHOD OF TESTING SHEET MATERIALS;

Marvin F. Skalmusky, Kimberly, and Carleton H.

Root and Robert C. McKee, Appleton, Wis., assignors to The Institute of Paper Chemistry,

Appleton, Wis., a corporation of Wisconsin Application October 28, 1949, Serial No. 124,014

1 Claim.

The presentinvention relates to the measurement of various characteristics of paperboard or other similar material and, more particularly, it relates to a method of predicting the characteristics of a paperboard as a corrugating medium.

One of the more important ways of using paperboard and some similar materials is by corrugating the material and fabricating it into paper boxes, using it for packaging, etc. Due to the fact that the material is corrugated, it has been found that the usual tests, e. g. testsrelating to tear and strength, do not indicate the desirability of a specimen of material as a corrugating medium. In this connection, it would be commercially desirable to provide simple laboratory or field test which will give an accurate indication of the applicability of a specimen of material as a corrugating medium so that the determination may be made without the use of large corrugating machines or other expensive apparatus.

The principal object of the present invention is to provide an improved method of evaluating sheet material in respect of its use as a corrugating medium. A further object of the invention is the provision of means of the character described which is speedy, economicaL-and practical. Other objects and advantages of the invention will become clear by reference to the accompanying description and drawings.

In the drawings:

Figures 1 and 2 are isometric views showing cooperating die members constructed in accordance with the invention; I

Figure 3 is an elevational view illustrating a mechanical press for forcing the die members together;

Figure 4 is an isometric view of a fork and keeper which are adapted to rigidly hold a fluted specimen of sheet material;

Figure 5 is an isometric view of a machine for evaluating the use of the sheet material as a corrugating medium;

Figures 6 and 7 are isometric views of two types of support for the fork shown in Figure 4; and, w

Figure e-is a fragmentar view, partiall in ,2 section, showing a specimen of paperboard with relation to various operative parts of the testing apparatus. I

In accordance with the present invention, a specimen or sample of material, such as I0, is formed to provide an elongated flute or corrugation II. The flute II is then subjected to various measurable forces which may be applied generally perpendicularly to its apex (Fig. 8). We have found that the extent of the force required to break down, or cause the flute to collapse is indicative of the value of the material for use as a corrugating medium.

In order to form the flute H in the specimen I0, a shaping member or tool I 2 is provided which may be inserted into any well-known type of press, as for example, the mechanical press shown at l3 in Figure 3. When corrugated paperboard is fabricated, it is frequently heated in the corrugating process and, accordingly, the shaping'tool I2 is heated in the press [3 by suitable heating means comprising electrically energized thermal elements I4 and I5. As a resuit, the specimen l0 may be subjected to substantially the same conditions in forming the flute H as a board or larger section of the material would undergo when being corrugated in commercial processing.

After the flute I l is formed, the specimen [0 is removed from the shaping tool 12 in avmanner such that the flute H is not deformed, or. subjected to strains or stresses which might affect the measurement of the corrugating characteristics of the specimen [0. This is accomplished by clamp means I6 which grasps the fluted specimen H) in the shaping tool I2. The clamped specimen is then placed in a testing machine, such as H and shown generally in Figure 5, and the flute l l is put under compression. The clamp means I6 should beplaced in supporting means l8 in the machine I! while the specimen I0 is i being tested.

The shaping tool l2 comprises a punch die l9 and a matrix die 20 which are constructed so that they will form a flute of the desired shape in a specimenwhen interengaged with one an-- other. In the drawings, the dies, I9 and 20, are proportioned to form a generally V-shaped flute having a rounded apex 2| and diverged ends 22 which are curved, as shown in Figure 8. Accordingly, the punch die I9, which is preferably made of steel or other heat conductive material, includes a generally V-shaped ridge 22, having a rounded apex and curved edges. A pair of slots 23 are formed on each side of the ridge 22 and are located immediately adjacent the edges of the ridge 22. The punch die I9 further includes a pair of aligning studs 23a which are attached thereto for engaging the matrix die 28 to prevent damage to the specimen III and dies I9 and 28 when the flute I I is being formed.

The matrix die includes a recess 24 having complementary dimensions with respect to the ridge 22 formed in the punch die I9. Slots 25, similar to those formed in the punch die I9, are located in the matrix die 20 on either side of the recess 24 and holes or openings 26 are drilled in the die which are preferably lined with brass as shown at 21 in the drawing. The holes 26 are located so as to engage studs 23a and guide the ridge 22 into the recess 24.

As pointed out, the clamp means I6 grasps the specimen I0 without deforming the flute II and this is accomplished by fabricating the means I 6 so as to positively clamp onto the specimen I9 prior to its removal from the shaping tool I2. Accordingly, the clamp means I6 comprises a fork or bifurcated section 28 and a keeper 29. The bifurcated section 28 includes a pair of leaved arms 30 which are disposed in parallel relation, a cross piece 3| which is attached to one end of each of the arms 30, and a handle 32. Each arm 30 includes a pair of superposed leaves 33 and 34 which are held by the cross piece 3| closely adjacent one another. The unattached ends of the leaves 33 and 34 are preferably tapered toward one another, as shown at 34a, to form a mouth and facilitate engagement of the fork 28 with the specimen I0 while in the shaping tool I2.

The keeper 29 includes a block section 35 having a clamping slot 36 formed therein. The slot, in the illustrated construction, has a tapered mouth 36a and is proportioned to engage the arms 30 of the fork member 28 and positively clamp the leaves 33 and 34 together along their length. For convenience, the keeper 29 also includes a handle 31.

The arms 30 are spaced apart so as to flt into slots 23 and 25 of the dies I9 and 28 and to grasp the specimen I0 along the edge of the flute II. The leaves 33 and 34 are shaped and proportioned so as to prevent spreading of the flute I I when held together by the keeper 29.

In order to prevent flexing of the arms 38, during testing, and bending of the specimen I0 transverse of the flute II, and to more accurately test the sample I8, the clamp means I6 is placed in the holder I8 while the flute II is subjected to pressure in testing machine II. The holder I8 may comprise a block, such as block 38, shown in Figure '7, having a pair of slots 39 formed in one face which are positioned to accommodate the arms 30 of the fork section 28 and proportioned so that it will only contain one of the leaves 33 or 34. I As a result of this construction, the fluted specimen I0 is rigidly held upon a substantially flat surface (Fig. 8) and more accurate evaluation is possible. V Other supporting means I 8 may be used, as for example ablock40 of the type shown in Figure 31-... Thi b ea .liesfa sha e t r, e punch 4 die I9 and includes slots 4|, and a ridge 42 which is a truncated form of the ridge 22. The truncated ridge 42 is proportioned to extend above the arms 30 of the clamp means I6 when supported in the slots 4|. As a result, when the flute II breaks down during the testing operation, the pressure of the testing machine I1 is not resisted by the arms 38 of the fork section 28 but by the truncated ridge 42.

The press I3, as before pointed out, may be of any well-known type, and includes a pair of pressure plates, such as 43 and 44, which plates may be urged together as by screw 45 and wheel 48 shown in Figure 3. Similarly, the testing machine Il may comprise any suitable commercially available machine. As shown in the drawings, the testing machine II includes a frame structure 46, a platform 41 supported by a scale or indicator 4,8 and an adjustable pressure plate 49 which is actuated by a wheel and screw arrangement 50.

In order to determine the characteristics of a specimen of paperboard as a corrugating medium, the specimen I0 is placed intermediate the dies I9 and 20, and the thermal elements I4 and I5 are disposed between the dies I 9 and 28 and the press I3. The shaping tool I2 is then heated and put under pressure so that the specimen is subjected to a pressure of from about 300 pounds per square inch to about 1500 pounds per square inch for about /2 to 10 seconds. The specimen should be heated to a temperature of from about 200 F. to about 350 F. While the dies I9 and 20 are under pressure, the fork section 28 is inserted in slots 23 and 25 so as to engage the specimen I II and project from the opposite side of the shaping tool I2. The keeper 29 is then clamped onto the arms 30 so that the leaves 33 and 34 positively engage the specimen I0 therebetween.

After the flute has been formed, the specimen I8 is removed from the dies I9 and 20 by opening' the press I3 and removing the thermal elements I4 and I5. The clamp means I6 is then placed in the holder I8 which comprises block 38, as shown in Figure 7. As a result, the flute is clamped to a substantially flat surface. The holder I8 and clamp means I6 are placed upon the platform 41 of the testing machine I1 and the pressure plate 49 is applied to the flute II (Figure 8). The scale 48 measures the point where the flute II collapses, which point is indicative of the value of the board, of which the specimen III is a sample, as a corrugating medium.

The fluted specimen I8 may also be subjected to an end-wise thrust and this may be done by removing the specimen from the dies I9 and 28 and placing it in suitable guides in the testing machine I'I so that the flute II extends vertically between the platform 41 and the pressure plate 49 of the testing machine II.

In the foregoing we have described a simple and economical method of determining the applicability of various paperboards or like material as corrugating mediums. The apparatus described is particularly adapted for laboratory use and provides results which are truly indicative of-the applicability of a sheet material as a corrugating medium.

The various features of the invention which are believed new are set forth in the following claim.

We claim:

A method of evaluating a sheet of material for use as a corrugating medium, comprising the steps of forming a single elongated flute, having a cross section equivalent to the cross section of the flutes to be formed in the medium in a sample of the sheet, said flute having an apex which extends along its length, rigidly clamping the sample at the base of and along the edges of said flute, maintaining said edges in fixed relation and a portion outside of each of said edges in coplanar relation, and then applying a measurable compressive force to the apex of said flute and toward the plane of said portions until said flute collapses, said force being generally perpendicular to the plane of said portions.




References Cited in the flle of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS Number Name Date Remus June 9, 1896 Vadner Apr. 27,1937 Blum et al Dec. 10, 1940 Kirch et a1. Apr. 21, 1942 Kieckhefer Jan. 4, 1944 Templin Feb. 6, 1945 Boor et a1. Apr. 16, 1949 Sobota May 3, 1949 Tinker Aug. 15, 1950 'Getchell Oct. 10, 1950

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US561814 *Dec 29, 1894Jun 9, 1896 Caedboaed
US2078296 *Oct 19, 1934Apr 27, 1937Samuel VadnerMeans for testing compression strength of materials
US2224248 *Jul 10, 1939Dec 10, 1940Blum Robert JApparatus for testing the crush strength of paper
US2280092 *Sep 15, 1939Apr 21, 1942Kirch Trumbull CorpMachine for and method of forming folded toilet seat covers
US2338338 *Dec 5, 1942Jan 4, 1944Kieckhefer Container CompanyStiffness testing device
US2368900 *Mar 15, 1943Feb 6, 1945Templin Richard LCompression testing jig
US2469013 *Jan 19, 1948May 3, 1949Fort Howard Paper CoMethod of evaluating paper toweling or the like
US2479303 *Sep 2, 1948Aug 16, 1949American Cyanamid CoCrease resistance testing
US2518959 *Jul 21, 1948Aug 15, 1950Perkins & Son Inc B FApparatus for testing the crush strength of paper
US2525345 *May 20, 1948Oct 10, 1950Perkins & Son Inc B FMachine for rupturing paper and the like for testing purposes
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3067609 *Feb 6, 1959Dec 11, 1962Leah S ChupackLeather grading devices
US3142174 *Nov 23, 1962Jul 28, 1964Titanium Metals CorpBend test apparatus
US3479866 *Jun 19, 1967Nov 25, 1969Lockheed Aircraft CorpHydrogen embrittlement testing method and apparatus
US5048347 *Sep 7, 1990Sep 17, 1991Georgia-Pacific CorporationMethod for testing corrugated medium
US5507189 *Dec 29, 1993Apr 16, 1996Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.Apparatus for evaluating plane strain stretch formability, and method therefor
US5616848 *Mar 20, 1995Apr 1, 1997Chrysler CorporationPlate testing apparatus and method of testing
US5902936 *Apr 17, 1998May 11, 1999Association De Gestion De L'ecoleCompression test device for paper strips
U.S. Classification73/821, 73/838, 493/463, 73/159
International ClassificationG01N3/00
Cooperative ClassificationG01N3/00
European ClassificationG01N3/00