Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2647211 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJul 28, 1953
Filing dateJan 11, 1949
Priority dateJan 11, 1949
Publication numberUS 2647211 A, US 2647211A, US-A-2647211, US2647211 A, US2647211A
InventorsSmeby Lynne C
Original AssigneeSmeby Lynne C
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Radio antenna
US 2647211 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

y 8, 1953 L. c. SMEBY 2,647,211

RADIO ANTENNA Filed Jan. 11, 1949 3 Sheets-Sheet 1 PRIOR ART 3 3 l? 5 w 1,4, l I 7 8M 2 WJLW 2 W53 Lynne (3. Smelgy,

ATTOR N EY y 28, 3 L. c. SMEBY 2,647,211

' RADIO ANTENNA Filed Jan. 11, 1949 5 Sheets-Sheet 2 I D0 11 i2 12 11 1kg; 12 a- 5 12 Lynne 8. 6771317 9,

ATTO R N EY L. C. SMEBY RADIO ANTENNA July 28, 1953 Fiied Jan. 11, 1949 3 Sheets-Sheet 3 res/L Flu/Ice) rem fance u a a w n 0 m a m m 2 4 167/67 OFL- deg m- L m VERTICAL JIVGLE RELATIVE 1-7540 INTENSITY I 3 m,- C. Smeby,

Lynne ATTORNEY Patented July 28, 1953 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE RADIO ANTENNA Lynne C. Smeby, Washington, D. 0.

Application January 11, 1949, Serial N 0. 70,333

7 Claims. (01. 25043) This invention relates to radio communication, and particularly to an improved form of antenna for'the propagation of radio frequency energy from a transmitter, and for the purpose of receiving radio signals; while the features of the invention are described herein in terms of transmitting, these features are also applicable to improving the performance of receiving antennas.

It is a principal object of the invention to provide an antenna design which permits an accurate control of the base impedance and radiation characteristics thereof, without mechanical complication and in'general with a reduced installation cost.

Another object of the invention is to provide such a design that is applicable either to seriesfed, or shunt-fed antennas, as well as to antennas with other types of feeds, and which will be useful over a wide range of propagation frequencies, but most particularly at relatively lower frequencies in which the dimensions of con- Ventional antenna structures become so large as to represent costly and bulky structures.

A further object of the invention is to provide an antenna design which will permit a desirable distribution of excitation current lengthwise of the antenna itself (that is to say, generally in the vertical direction of a vertical radiator), whereby the vertical pattern of the radiation may effectively be controlled.

Another and very important object of the invention is to provide means operable to strengthen and reenforce the radiation from the upper portion or portions of a generally vertically arranged radiator, by means which are mechanically simple and which do not interfere with the mechanical bracing or guying generally required with vertical radiators of practical heights.

An ancillary object of the invention is to provide an antenna having the above objects achieved in such a way as to facilitate the use of lumped capacitance-to-earth at the upper end of the radiator, known in the prior art as top loading, in combination with a current and impedance controlling element or array in accordance with my invention, whereby the combined advantages of such devices may be obtained with a minimum increase in cost, and indeed with an actual saving in cost when the possible reduction in overall mast or radiator height is taken into consideration.

The above and other objects and advantages of my invention will best be understood by referring to the following detailed specification of certain selected and preferred embodiments thereof,

chosen by way of illustration and not limitation, and by a like reference'to the accompanying drawings forming a part hereof, in which:

Fig. 1 is a schematic elevational view of a simple antenna of the series-fed, vertical radiator type well known in the prior art,

Fig. 2 is a similar view of an antenna'of the same type which has been modified in accordance with the invention,

Fig. 3 is a like View of a further development of the invention,

Fig. 4 is a similar illustration of a further refinement in accordance with the invention showing multiple folds of the basic top loading elements shown in Figs. 2 and 3,

Fig. 5 is a like illustration of a further refinement in accordance with the invention showing one element of the basic arrangement within a shield,

Fig. 6 is a like view of a further development of the invention showing one of the elements within a shield and the shield itself used as one of the elements,

Fig. '7 is a like view of a further refinement showing the combination of the control feature of the invention in physical combination with a species of top loading known in the prior art as a hat,

Fig. 8 is a similar illustration of a further refinement in accordance with the invention showing the combination of the control feature of the invention in physical combination with a species of top loading known in the prior art as an umbrella.

Fig. 8A illustrates a further refinement in accordance with the invention showing the combination of the control feature of the invention in physical combination with a lumped or capacity loading situated in relation to the main radiator at a location other than the top.

Fig. 8B is a like view of a further refinement showing the use of multiple units of the control feature of the invention, Fig. 9 is an illustration of the control feature of the invention applied to a radiator in free space, r

Fig. 10 is a graphical presentation of the change in base impedance characteristics of a radiator obtainable with the improved structure, and

Fig. 11 is a graphical presentation of the change in vertical radiator characteristic of a radiator obtainable with the improved structure.

Fig. 1 of the drawings illustrates a well known form of series-fed transmitting antenna consist ing of a single wire radiator l standing substantially vertical above earth. A single wire is used for purposes of illustration only, and any conventional type of radiator may be employed. The radiator is excited by a radio frequency generator connected across the insulator 2 directly or by a conventional transmission line. Such a radiator will have an impedance across the insulator known as the base impedance, and a vertical radiation characteristic primarily in accordance with the length of radiator l in comparison with the wavelength of the energy from the generator. Such an antenna usually has a length between 36 and 225 (where 360 is a full wavelength), although greater and lesser lengths are sometimes used. As an illustration, in some broadcasting station applications, a. simple vertical radiator as shown in Fig. 1 with a height as low as 60 is satisfactory; whereas in other applications, a height as great as 225 is used. The greater the height of theradiator up to 225", the greater will be the ground wave radiation due to the improved radiation characteristics. At increasing heights (up to 180) the radiation at angles above the horizon will be decreased in proportion to the ground plane radiation and above heights of 180 there will be a decrease in radiation at certain angles above horizontal and an increase at others. The higher the radiator is up to 225, the greater the-base radiation resistance as measured across the insulator 2 shown in Fig. 1 will be, within limits. There is always present in a grounded antenna a loss resistance in the ground system. Ordinarily the ohmic loss or the radiator itself is negligible. Therefore, the higher the radiation resistance, the greater will be the efiiciency of the antenna system, thereby producing a greater radiation field.

At antenna heights below approximately 90, the base reactance is negative and therefore an inductance coil is required to tune the radiator to resonance. Such a tuning coil has resistance and therefore involves a loss of power with a consequent reduction in field strength. With decreasing height of radiators, the tuning coil required becomes larger and larger thereby increasing the loss of power in the coil. As the height of the radiator is decreased, the coil losses become serious in the neighborhood of 40 antenna heights.

When two or more radiators are operated in a directional antenna array, the self-impedance of each radiator is modified due to the mutual effect between the radiators. In some arrays, the radiation resistance of the directional array as a whole is reduced to a point Where-the ground system losses become appreciable. In general, the higher the radiators in a directional system, the greater will be the efiective radiation resistance of the system and hence, the smaller the ground system losses. This is because the higher the radiators, in general, the higher is the selfresistance of each individual radiator operating by itself.

In the prior art, lumped capacitance in a form known as a hat has been connected to the top of the radiator in order to increase the base radiation resistance and/or to improve the vertical radiation characteristic. Another method of obtaining approximately the same end has been to sectionalize a radiator by placing an insulator approximately in the center of the radiator with a loading coil connected across the insulator. These methods have been limited in their efiect because in the case of the lumped capacitance at the top or" the radiator, there are mechanical restrictions as to how large the loading can be, and in the case of the sectionalized radiator the limitation arises from the loss sustained in the loading coil.

I have found that the radiation eihciency of a vertical wire antenna having a length which is only a fraction of the radiated wave length may be greatly increased by artificially creating a redistribution of antenna current such that the current density at the upper end of the radiator is increased, and that at its lower portion correspondingly decreased (as compared with the conventional, which has a maximum current at or near its base and zero current at its upper X. :emity as shown in curve a of Fig. l) by folding a portion of the top of the radiator back upon itself to provide a radiating leg spaced from and generally parallel to the upper portion of the antenna, as is indicated by the folded portion 3 at the upper end of a fractional wavelength radiator in Fig. 2. In this figure the ampliture of the antenna current at each Vertical level is indicated by the dashed curve line b, and a comparison with the similar dashed curve a of Fig. 1 will illustrate the manner in which this change provides a current distribution having a substantial value well up the radiator and zero amplitude at the base, with consequent improvement in base impedance and/or in vertical radiat on characteristic.

It must be clearly borne in mind that the folded-back portion 3 of the antenna of Fig. 2 is to be distinguished from the usual and wellknown top loading structure heretofore utilized to provide in effect a capacitance-to-earth in parallel with the current conducting path provided by the radiator. Such top loading capacitance is effective only to alter the condition of resonance existing, for instance, at the base of the antenna; the capacitance to ground, however, of the short vertical section 3 of Fig. 2 is practically trivial. This section acts in combination with the main antenna section l as a true radiating portion, and in effect permits the same base impedance to be obtained as would be the case if the actual length of the antenna were the sum of the lengths of portions 3 and but with a considerable saving in overall height, and hence in construction and maintenance costs, While the drawings show the antenna as a simple vertical wire, it is intended to include within the scope of this invention the application of the same arrangements to vertical mast radiators of all kinds.

Fig. 3 of the drawings illustrates the development of the principles of the invention in which the same mechanical arrangement is used as illustrated in Fig. 2, with the addition of an element 5 folded back up the radiator, and again in conductive relation to the main vertical radiator 4.

The principles of Fig. 3 may be carried forward by providing one or more multiply-folded auxiliary radiating portions such as illustrated by numeral 6 in Fig. i. In this case, the base impedance is altered to any given degree by a shorter length of elements than is obtained by the use of the arrangement shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 5 of the drawings illustrates a development of the principles of the invention in which one of the elements is enclosed in a shield. Numeral 1 indicates a conductive shield surrounding a folded-over element 3, such that the radiation from 3-is substantially suppressed. The radiation from the radiator 4 and from the element 5 are in phase, with aconsequent adding in phase of the fields produced by their respective currents. The field produced by the current flow in element 3 of Fig. 3 is out of phase with the field produced by the flow of current in elements 4 and 5. In the arrangement shown in Fig. 5, the radiation from element 3 is substantially suppressed thereby producing a further crowding of the total efiective current towards the top of the radiator, as shown by curve 0."

A further development of the principles of the invention is shown in Fig. 6; The folded-over element 3 is placed within a conductive shield 8 which in turn is insulated from the radiator 4. The top of element 3 is connected conductively to the radiator 4, and the bottom of element 3- is connected to shield 8 as illustrated by numeral 9. The radiation from element 3 which is out of phase with the radiation from radiator 4 and shield 8 is substantially suppressed by the shielding effect of shield 8. This produces a crowding of the total efiective current towards the top of the structure as illustrated by a curve 12.

In Fig. 7, numeral 4 again indicates a radiator of conventional design. Numeral Ill indicates a capacitance loading of the conventional type known in the prior art as a hat. Numerals 3 and 5 indicate elements following the principles of the invention connecting the top of the radiator 4 to the hat l0. In Fig, 7, the principles of the invention combine with the conventional type of top loading to produce a crowding of the current on the radiator towards the top as shown by the current distribution curve e. The principle of the invention may be combined with any other species of top loading known in the prior art such as a sphere, portions of the top guy wires of a tower, or specially installed wires such as shown in Fig. 8. Numeral H, in Fig. 8 indicates a portion of guy wire or specially installed wire connected to the radiator numeral 4 by elements 3 and 5 embodying the principles of the invention, such portions H being defined between suitable insulators l2. While Fig. 8 shows only two radiating elements H, ordinarily three or more such elements spaced at equal azimuth angles are employed. All of the elements would be connected together.

In Fig. 8A numeral 4 illustrates a conventional radiator in combination with the control features of the present invention and a lumped or capacity loading located at a height other than the top of the radiator 4. Element 3 is a foldedback conductor surrounded by a shield l. The top of 3 is connected at or near the top of radiator 4, and the shield I may be insulated from 4 or connected conductively at one or more places. Numeral I3 indicates a horizontal conductor; however, this is intended to represent any sort of lumped capacitance loading such as a hat insulated from the main radiator 4, a set of guy wires insulated from radiator 4, a set of especially installed wires insulated from radiator 4 or any other species of lumped capacitance. The lumped capacitance I3 is connected to the conductor 3 by the connection indicated by numeral l4. By placing the lumped capacitance l3 at an elevation below the top of radiator 4, the mechanical arrangement is made easier and the required strength of the tower reduced, thereby efiecting a saving in cost. In addition, for any given mechanical size of the lumped capacitance I 3, the capacity to ground is increased if I3 is 6 moved from'the top of the'tower towards the ground, thereby increasing the effective electrical loading. The current flowing in the conductor 3 is out of phase with the current flowing in the main radiator 4 and therefore if 3 were not shielded, the field produced by it would subtract from the field produced by the radiator I thereby reducing the effectiveness of the invention, Therefore, shield 1 is provided to substantially reduce the radiation from element 3. This is not'intended to preclude the use of the invention without the shield 1. In addition to feeding the lumped capacitance l 3, the conductor 3 will have a standing wave on it producing additional effective loading at the top of the radiator 4, and thereby further improving the operation of the antenna.

7 The use of multiple units of the features of the invention is shown in Fig. 8B. Numeral l5 indicates a vertical metallic radiator of the square cross section type by way of illustration, it being intended that multiple units may be disposed about radiators of any other cross section. Numerals ifi and I! indicate the folded-back conductors of the invention as illustrated in Fig. 3. Such conductors may also be provided on a second face of the radiator I5 as indicated at numerals l8 and I9. Progressively, additional units in accordance with the invention may be added, not necessarily at azimuth angles such that'they are placed on different faces of the radiator l 5.

The units may be of difierent lengths depending on the desired results. While Fig. 8B shows each unit perpendicular to a face, each unit may have its axis parallel to the axis of the radiator H5 or at any other angle thereto. The initial element of each unit such as 15 need not necessarily start at the top of the radiator l5, and the last element in each unit need not necessarily be terminated level with the top of radiator l5. The ends of respective last elements in each unit may be connected together in any manner such as by a ring or bringing ends of the units together above the radiator l5. It is intended that multiple units of the same or different species of the invention may be combined depending upon the results desired.

Figs. 1 thru 8B illustrate radiators standing above earth. The principles of the invention may equally well be applied to radiators in free space. Fig. 9 shows a free space radiator fed by a generator 20 connected across the insulator 2|. Elements 22 and 23 are the conventional radiators, each provided with one of the species of the invention by Way of illustration shown in Fig. 9 by the folded-back portions- 24 and 25 at one end of the radiator and like portions 26 and 21 at the other.

Fig. 10 is a plot of reactance and resistance measurements that were made on an embodiment of the invention as shown in Fig. 3. Fig. 10 shows that the reactance at the base of the radiator with zero length of folded-back portion L was negative and that the reactance could be shifted over to a positive value by the proper selection of the length of L (Fig. 3). This would allow the use of a capacity to tune the radiator to resonance instead of an inductance, thereby eliminating the loss that would have resulted if the features of the invention had not been used and a coil tuning unit had been employed. Fig. 10 also shows the change in base resistance. By the proper selection of the length of L, the base radiation resistance of the radiator may be materially increased thereby increasing the ratio 0L radiation to? radiation plus; groumh resistance. consequently increasing; the efi'eetivee radiated: fielda Curve. Lei-1 Eig; 1 1 illustratesithe vertical; radiae tion-t chanaeteristic. Of. a. conventional 1'20 tall: radiator: Withtherempleymentgoirtheprineiples: oi the invention; thailzfl tall radiator can-,be made; to simulate electrically 'a; radiator: of: 180 height;- The: vertical; radiation. characteristic; would be them asrshorwns curve gofi li ig;v 11;. It, is seenthatthe :ground2 plane radiation would belincreased and the" intensities of radiation at. higher: angles: would be; decreased; in-e proportiom. to the radiation in theground: plane Lclaim:

1. An. antenna, comprising. a, linean conductor, an auxiliary conductor connected totoneeendzvof the-first. named conductor, and; lying parallel to but; spacedefromv said-firstshamed;conductor; and a. radiating shield, disposed, tolshield; said. aux-- iliary conductor and:v electrically connected to that end of; said: auxiliary conductor which; is; more remote from. the: connection, between; the.v first-named conductor and; said auxiliary'con ductor;

2 An; antennasystem comprising a substantially vertical linear main conductor, an. aux: iliary conductor. connected to: the: upper end of said main conductor andextending downwardly therefrom iii-parallel. spaced relation to. said main conductor, and capacity loading meanstconnected. to-the lowerend: of saidauxiliary conductor and having substantial extension in. a horizontal plane.

3-. The invention in accordance. with claim 2,, and meansfor shieldingatleastaportion oi said.- auxiliary conductor.

4s Anv antennav system comprising. a. substan:- tially verticallinear. main conductor, an aux-- iliary conductor. connected-to the. upper end of saidmain conductor and having at. least one leg extendingdownwardly from said upper end of the main conductor in spaced parallel relation thereto, and; capacityloading means connected 82 to.=:said-. auxiliary; conductor-and having suhstane tial. extension inla: horizontal plane.

5. antenna, system comprising a substan-- tially vertical, linear: main conductor, an aux,- iliary conductor connected. to the upper endof; said main conductor; and'having at, leastvone; leg extending; downwardly. from said upper. end ofthe main: conductor, in. spaced parallel relation thereto; and capacity loading means connected to;the;-extremityofsaid,.-auxiliary conductor and. Ina-vines substantial extension in a horizontal plane;

6? Am antenna system. comprising a substantially verticallinear main; conductor, an auxiliarx conductor. connected. to the upper. endof. said main, conductor. and having aplurality of parallel legs. connected: in-serieswith oneanother and tall lyingginspaced parallel. relation to saidmainlcomdnctor-.- .and-capacity5 loading means connectedto.

that leg otv saidianxiliary conductor most remote. from said main conductor; said loading; means haying; substantial. extension in a horizontal;


7;; Anantenna system in accordance with claim. 6, in which said loading means comprises anumhrella assembly of; connected, substantially radial conductors.


References-Cited in the file of. this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1696402 *Aug 7, 1924Dec 25, 1928Hope Webbing CompanyRadioantenna
US1839426 *Jul 16, 1925Jan 5, 1932Drahtlose Telegraphie GmbhAntenna
US2130387 *Jul 25, 1936Sep 20, 1938Rca CorpAerial feeder arrangement
US2283914 *Jul 24, 1937May 26, 1942Rca CorpAntenna
US2344171 *Apr 4, 1942Mar 14, 1944Standard Telephones Cables LtdTower type antenna
US2417793 *Aug 1, 1944Mar 18, 1947Rca CorpAntenna
US2511931 *May 29, 1946Jun 20, 1950Rca CorpBroadcast antenna
GB581567A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2941207 *Aug 15, 1955Jun 14, 1960Robert Dollar CompanyRadio antenna
US2994876 *Jan 9, 1958Aug 1, 1961Josephson Bengt Adolf SamuelUltrashortwave antenna
US3048845 *Apr 13, 1960Aug 7, 1962Telefunken GmbhMechanically rigid counterpoise structure
US3089141 *Jun 10, 1955May 7, 1963Hirschmann RadiotechnikAntenna tuned by bending end portions
US3229298 *Nov 27, 1962Jan 11, 1966Morgan Dean OBent-arm multiband dipole antenna wherein overall dimension is quarter wavelength on low band
US3289208 *Feb 12, 1962Nov 29, 1966Lee Hollingsworth RAnti-sky wave radiating system
US3345635 *Oct 11, 1965Oct 3, 1967Collins Radio CoFolded vertical monopole antenna
US3384896 *Jun 28, 1965May 21, 1968Northrop CorpVertical monopole with spiral-shaped top loading
US3389396 *Jul 14, 1965Jun 18, 1968Dorne And Margolin IncLog periodic type antenna for operating at less than a half wavelength mode
US3524191 *Apr 12, 1968Aug 11, 1970Ehrenspeck Hermann WEndfire antenna array in which the elements of array are bent and have portions running along length of array
US3543277 *Feb 16, 1968Nov 24, 1970Martin Marietta CorpReduced size broadband antenna
US3618109 *Jul 23, 1968Nov 2, 1971Granger AssociatesAntenna construction with effectively extended radiator elements
US3771162 *May 14, 1971Nov 6, 1973Andrew California CorpOmnidirectional antenna
US3845489 *Sep 14, 1971Oct 29, 1974Saint GobainWindow antenna
US4259672 *Sep 18, 1979Mar 31, 1981Butternut ElectronicsMulti-band vertical antenna
US4511900 *May 10, 1982Apr 16, 1985Rockwell International CorporationCurrent enhanced monopole radiation type antenna apparatus
US5600339 *Dec 6, 1994Feb 4, 1997Oros; Edward A.Antenna
US5995064 *Nov 25, 1996Nov 30, 1999Kabushiki Kaisha Yokowa, Also Trading As Yokowo Co., Ltd.Antenna having a returned portion forming a portion arranged in parallel to the longitudinal antenna direction
US6946997Jan 20, 2004Sep 20, 2005Alps Electric Co., Ltd.Dual band antenna allowing easy reduction of size and height
US7250917Jan 13, 2005Jul 31, 2007Thompson Louis HDirectional wire antennas for radio frequency identification tag system
US20040150567 *Jan 20, 2004Aug 5, 2004Alps Electric Co., Ltd.Dual band antenna allowing easy reduction of size and height
DE3840105A1 *Nov 28, 1988May 11, 1989Karl H HilleShort vertical antenna having a maximised radiating area
EP0938158A2 *Feb 17, 1999Aug 25, 1999Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd.Antenna
EP0938158A3 *Feb 17, 1999Nov 2, 2000Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd.Antenna
EP1441414A1 *Jan 15, 2004Jul 28, 2004Alps Electric Co., Ltd.Dual band antenna with reduced size and height
EP1641070A1 *Nov 23, 1996Mar 29, 2006Kabushiki Kaisha Yokowo (also trading as Yokowo Co., Ltd.)Antenna
EP1683231A1 *Oct 29, 2004Jul 26, 2006Wavetest Systems, Inc.High performance antenna
EP1683231A4 *Oct 29, 2004Jan 23, 2008Wavetest Systems IncHigh performance antenna
U.S. Classification343/752, 343/908, 343/828, 343/841, 343/802
International ClassificationH01Q9/26, H01Q9/04
Cooperative ClassificationH01Q9/26
European ClassificationH01Q9/26