|Publication number||US2656545 A|
|Publication date||Oct 27, 1953|
|Filing date||Jan 10, 1952|
|Priority date||Jun 28, 1948|
|Publication number||US 2656545 A, US 2656545A, US-A-2656545, US2656545 A, US2656545A|
|Inventors||Conzelman Jr John E, Ellis Herbert B, O'brien Clayton W|
|Original Assignee||Conzelman Jr John E, Ellis Herbert B, O'brien Clayton W|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (16), Classifications (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Oc t. 27, 1953 J. E. coNzELMAN, JR. Erm. 2,656,545
PROSTHETIC DEVICE SENSORY ATTACHMENT Original Filed June 28, 1948 INVNTOQS JoHNQcoNzeLMnmJQ. HeQBeQT B. LUS D Y CLAYTON w. o'BmcN leo v BY /j [7l-r n; M
l nTToQNesJ Patented Oct. 27, 1953 PRosTHETfc DEVICE SENSOR ATTACHMENT John E. Conzelman, Jr., Sierra.MadreHerbert B.
Ellis, La Canada, and Clayton W. OBrien, Los' Angeles, Calif.
original application June 2s, 1948, serial No.
35,634, now Patent No. 15, 1952. Divided and 2,582,234, dated January this application January 10, 1952, Serial N0. 265,872
This invention relates to prosthetic devices and more particularly to a sensory Idevice for transmitting to the wearer offan artificial hand, or other prosthesis, an indication of contact made by the artificial member.
An object of our invention is to provide a sensory mechanism for a prosthetic device, which is capable o f transmitting to its wearer an indication not lonly that the artificial member is touching something, but also an indication of the degree of pressure being exerted during that contact.
This application constitu-tes a division of our co-pending application, Serial No. 35,634, filed June 28, 1948, now Patent No. 2,582,234, issued January 15, 1952.
The invention possesses Vother objects and features of advantage, some of which, with the foregoing, will be set forth in the following description of the preferred forms of our invention which are illustrated in the drawings accompanying and forming part of the specification. It is to be understood that we do not limit ourselves to the showing made'by the said drawings and description, as we may adopt variations of the preferred forms Within the scope of our invention as set forth in the claim.
Referring to the drawings:
Figure 1 is a perspective view of a prosthetic hand illustrating a preferred form of the sensory device of our present invention.
Figure 2 is a sectional view drawn to an enlarged scale, taken in part `on the line 2-2 of Fig. l and in part through the tip of one of the fingers of the artificial hand.
Figure 3 is a perspective view similar to Fig. 1 but showing a modified form of sensory device incorporating principles of the present invention,
Figure 4 is a schematic view of the electrical circuit associated with the sensory device of Fig. 3.
The sensory device of our present invention is adapted for constructional incorporation into, and use in conjunction with substantially any prosthetic device. However, it was designed primarily for the artificial hand disclosed in our co-pending application, hereinabove identified, to which it is an especially valuable and desirable accessory, because of the powerful grip which this particular hand is made capable of exerting by means of the force multiplier with which it is provided. Because of the powerful grip which this hand can exert, any article which is grasped by it would be apt to be crushed were it not provided with a sensory device, such as that of the v1 claim. (o1. 3 142) present invention, which keeps thewearer constantly informed of the magnitude of the force with which the hand is pressing against the article held. Particularly true is this specific hand, since'the design, construction, and manner of incorporation of the said force multiplier into the hand,l and its manner of beingv operably coupled to actuating muscles of the Wearer,make it possible-to exert Ya gripping force of considerable f magnitude withrelatively little effort-so little,
in fact, that the wearer is apt not to realize how much` force the artificial hand actually is rexerting. Moreover, this situation is even further intensified by the fact that the ratio'of the exerted gripping force Vof the hand to the muscular effort required to effectuate it, is not constant, but is subject to variation by adjustment of a simple control; and in the absence of means for keeping the wearer informed of the extent, or magnitude ofV the pressure imposed by the hand upon the article being Agrasped thereby, it would be entirely possible for the wearer to be under the impression thatthe force multiplier is adjusted to low ratio of gripping force'to muscular effort when in fact the opposite adjustment obtains, andthus inadvertantly cause the hand to grip with damaging force. The incorporation of the sensory device of the present invention with an artificial hand characterized by such a force multiplier greatly reduces this hazard, because of its capability of imparting to the wearer a dependable, and easily interpreted indication of the magnitude of the force which the artificial hand is, at any time, exerting against -the article being gripped.
With these considerations in view, we prefer to provide the prosthetic hand forming part of the subject-matter of our aforesaid co-pending application, with our improved sensory device as embodied in the modification thereof illustrated in Figures 1 and 2. Here we have illustrated a form of sensory device adapted to indicate contactual pressure by tactile sensation and based upon hydraulic principles of operation. A bladder on the end of a finger of the prosthesis 25, preferably the index finger 32, is connected by a flexible tube |5| to a second bladder |52 held by suitable harness |53 to a normally sensitive part of the skin of the stump of the amputee, indicated at |54. The bladders |50 and |52 have, respectively, flexible diaphragms |55 and |56, but are otherwise so rigid as to be substantially nonexpandable. The flexible tube I 5| may be of rubber but has a wall of such thickness and tensile strength that it. also, is substantially non expandable. The bladders |50 and |52 and the tube are lled to capacity with a non-compressible fluid, shown at |51 in Figure 2. Consequently, any pressure upon the diaphragm |55 tends to dilate the diaphragm |56 and the pressure is transmitted to the skin of the amputee in proportion to its intensity at the iinger tip. The tube |5| may be disposed entirely within the fingers and casings of the prosthesis, to maintain the aesthetic appearance of the hand, and the prosthesis may be covered by a cosmetic glove without seriously impairing the e'ectiveness of the sensory device.
A sensory device modiiied to operate on electric principles is illustrated ln Figur 3 and 4. A switch |60, of spring-resisted push-button type. is attached to the end of a ringer 32 of the prosthetic hand 25, so as to close an electric circuit |6| in response to finger-tip pressure. The circuit |6| includes a suitable battery |62 which may be located at any convenient point in the amputees clothing, and a vibrator disc |63 attached by harness |64 to the skin of the amputees stump. Pressure at the nger tip sufficient to close the switch |60 is indicated to the amputee by the sensation of vibration on his skin. By making the switch |60 of the rheostat or variable bridge type, with its movable element spring-urged to the high resistance end and thence to open position, the intensity of vibration may be made to coincide with the intensity of pressure.
By having his prosthetic hand equipped with a sensory device of either of the hereinabove modications, ,either of which is capable of transmitting to the amputee a signal the intensity of which is proportionate to the magnitude of force exerted by the hand against an article held thereby, he will be enabled to learn, when handling -a non-compressible object or a fragile one, to exert only the moderate force required by the existing circumstances. He will, therefore, be enabled to educate himself in the use of the prosthesis, so as to avoid over-stressing the operating mechanism of the prosthesis, and also liability i of crushing an article grasped thereby, since in his estimation of the force required to perform any certain act of grasping an object, he will be guided, at least in part, by the signal transmitted to VVa sensitive part of his skin, by the sensory device.
It will be readily understood, therefore, that the sensory device of our present invention constitutes a Valuable aid in the rehabilitation of an amputee, as well as a valuable working tool enabling an amputee to overcome the handicap of amputation.
1n a prosthetic device, a, sensory mechanism for indicating to the wearer by tactile sensation pressure exerted extraneously upon a portion of said device. and comprising an electric switch of spring-opened type secured to said portion of said prosthetic device so as to be closable by pressure of said portion upon an extraneous object, an electric vibrator secured to the skin surface of the wearer, and electric circuit connections between said switch and said vibrator, including connections to a source of electric power.
JOHN E. CONZELMAN, JR. HERBERT B. ELLIS. 4 CLAYTON W. OBRIEN.
References Cited in' the me of uns patent UNITED STATES PATENTS Number Name Date 2,567,066 Goldman Sept. 4, 1951 2,582,234 J. E. Conzelman et al. Jan. 15,1952
OTHER REFERENCES Terminal Research Reports on Articial Limbs, by Committee on Articial Limbs, National Research Council, received in Div. of the Patent Office Nov. 13, 1947-, page 88. (A copy is now in Div. 55 of the Patent Oifloe.)
Artificial Limbs, by Florent Martin, published by International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland, 1925, page 42. (A copy is in Div. 55 of the Patent Oiiice.)
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2567066 *||May 15, 1948||Sep 4, 1951||Goldman Irving A||Robot controlled limb|
|US2582234 *||Jun 28, 1948||Jan 15, 1952||Conzelman Jr John E||Prosthetic hand|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3241687 *||May 22, 1962||Mar 22, 1966||Moline Organisation Ltd||Mechanical handling apparatus|
|US3263824 *||Dec 20, 1963||Aug 2, 1966||Northrop Corp||Servo controlled manipulator device|
|US3509583 *||Sep 9, 1965||May 5, 1970||Bendix Corp||Electro-mechanical hand having tactile sensing means|
|US5246463 *||Feb 21, 1992||Sep 21, 1993||Giampapa Vincent C||Sensate and spacially responsive prosthesis|
|US7041141 *||Feb 21, 2002||May 9, 2006||Motion Control, Inc.||Safety clutch for a prosthetic grip|
|US7438724 *||Dec 13, 2004||Oct 21, 2008||Motion Control, Inc.||System and method for force feedback|
|US8470051||Dec 10, 2010||Jun 25, 2013||Hdt Robotics, Inc.||One motor finger mechanism|
|US9211200||Jun 24, 2013||Dec 15, 2015||Hdt Expeditionary Systems, Inc.||One motor finger mechanism|
|US9480582 *||Mar 23, 2006||Nov 1, 2016||Ossur Hf||System and method for conscious sensory feedback|
|US20050192676 *||Dec 13, 2004||Sep 1, 2005||Motion Control, Inc.||System and method for force feedback|
|US20080200994 *||Feb 21, 2007||Aug 21, 2008||Colgate J Edward||Detector and Stimulator for Feedback in a Prosthesis|
|US20090048539 *||Mar 23, 2006||Feb 19, 2009||Goran Lundborg||System and method for conscious sensory feedback|
|US20110144770 *||Dec 10, 2010||Jun 16, 2011||Kinea Design, LLC||One motor finger mechanism|
|EP0136247A2 *||Aug 7, 1984||Apr 3, 1985||Brig Research Ltd.||Apparatus for the prevention of pressure sores|
|EP0136247A3 *||Aug 7, 1984||Oct 9, 1985||Ben-Gurion University Of The Negev||Method and apparatus for the prevention of pressure sores|
|WO2003017877A1 *||Aug 26, 2002||Mar 6, 2003||Bergomed Ab||Device at a finger prosthesis|
|International Classification||A61F2/58, A61F2/50|