|Publication number||US2676122 A|
|Publication date||Apr 20, 1954|
|Filing date||Jan 9, 1951|
|Priority date||Jan 9, 1951|
|Publication number||US 2676122 A, US 2676122A, US-A-2676122, US2676122 A, US2676122A|
|Inventors||Randolph Mccarthy John|
|Original Assignee||Du Pont|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (3), Referenced by (27), Classifications (10)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Patented Apr. 20, 1954 UNITED STAT E TNT OFFICE ANTISTATIC TREATMENT OF HYDR-OPHOBIC F IBER ware No Drawing. Application January 9, 1951, Serial No. 205,235
This invention relates to non-cellulosic, hydrophobic textile materials having improved physical characteristics. More particularly, this invention deals with fibers, filaments, fabrics or other forms of synthetic, non-cellulosic textile materials such as nylon, polyacrylonitrile, polyethylene terephthalate and their various modifications.
Fibers of the aforementioned type are well known for their poor electrical conductivity. As a result, they tend to accumulate electrostatic charges in working, as for instance in the textile mill, or in service, as for instance in a rug. Such charges may be annoying for instance by causing a nylon dress to cling to the body of the wearer, interfering with the intended graceful hang of the garment; but they are worse than annoying in the textile mill, where such static charges, formed through repeated friction of the fiber, filament or yarn, may prevent proper spinning, drawing, twisting, weaving or knitting.
It is accordingly an object of this invention to provide textile materials of the aforementioned classes, which through treatment with an agent as defined below, shall be essentially free of noxious electrostatic qualities, or shall in any event be comparable in their working qualities to cotton, in so far as static charges are concerned.
Although the general idea of treating textile fiber with anti-static agents is old, the problem of selecting a proper agent is by no means a simple one. In the first place, the nature of the fiber to be treated must be taken into account. Thus, agents which have been indicated in the art as suitable for W001, viscose or cellulose acetate, do not as a rule produce good anti-static effects on hydrophobic, non-cellulosic fiber. Secondly, when an effective agent has been found it must answer still other qualifications; for instance, it must be compatible with lubricants, sizes and other agents commonly applied to fiber in the mill. It must allow proper running tensions of filament during drawing and twisting operations. It must be non-corrosive of the apparatus upon which the fiber will be worked, and it must be non-toxic and have no injurious dermatological effects upon the worker or upon the ultimate wearer.
Now, according to this invention excellentanti-static efiects upon non-cellulosic, hydrophobic textile materials are obtained by, using a special group of agents which may be defined broadly as mixtures of amine salts of long-chain alkyl phosphates, whereof the amine portion is an oxy-alkylene amine, such as mono-, di-, and
triethanol amine, the ethanol derivatives of monomethyl and dimethyl amine, and morpholine. In other words, the group of agents found useful according to this invention are mixtures, composed of compounds defined by the general formula-- wherein m designates the numeral 1 or 2, while y is the difference between 3 and at, Alk is a normal, alkyl radical having from 8 to 16 carbon atoms, and NX represents an oxyalkylene amine selected from the group consisting of the three ethanolamines, the three ethanol-methylamines (i. e. monoethanol-mono-methylamine, ethanoldimethylamine and diethanol-methylamine) and morpholine.
I find that I obtain .best results with mixtures of amine-salts of various alkyl-phosphates. Thus, a mixture of mole percent ofgives very much superior results to an agent consisting of the pure diamino-monoester. The superiority of the agent increases as the proportion of diester in the mixture increases, and for a 50:50 mixture it reaches a maximum appreciably superior to that obtainable from either of its pure components. The anti-static effects are nevertheless still veryhigh when the agent consists of pure monoamino-diester. Altogether then, it may be summarized as a general rule that the agent according to this invention should comprise a reaction product of phosphorus pentoxide, a straight-chained saturated primary, monohydric alcohol of more than 6 carbon atoms and an oxyalkylene amine as above defined, with the proviso that the reaction product shall comprise at least substantial quantities of the monoamino diester component.
In addition, they have the quality of being readily soluble in alcohol and self-dispersible in water, so that they may be applied to the fiber from either medium.
Their electrostatic effect is very high and rates from good to excellent in standard tests recently developed for measuring anti-static effects.
A particularly good effect is obtained when NX in the above general formula is a diethanolamine, and the best results in this group are obtained when the agent is an essentially equimolecular mixture of two esters of the formula OAlk O=PO Alk ONH2(C2H4OH):| and /OAlk O=P-ONH2(C2H4OH) ONH2(C2H4OH)2 which is obtained for instance by reacting one mole of phosphorus pentoxide with about 3 moles of the selected alcohol and then reacting this intermediate product with 3 moles or more of diethanolamine.
The quantity of agent required per unit weight of fiber is not high. A loading of agent as low at 0.02 gm. per 100 gm. of fiber will produce a remarkable improvement in electrical conductivity. Loadings as high as 2 by weight of the fiber may be used. More. commonly, however, loadings of 0.04 to 0.4% will be found both satisfactory and. economical.
Without limiting my invention the. following 2 examples are given to illustrate my preferred mode of operation. Parts mentioned are by weight.
PART A.-PR.EPA-.RATION OF THE AGENTS Ezramplei To a stirred mixture of 1 mole of n-cctanol-l, 1 mole of n-decanol-l, and 1 molecular equiva lent of Lorol (a commercial mixture. of primary alcohols, predominantly C12 and Col) was added over a period of .5 hours 1 mole of phosphorus pentoxide, keeping the reaction temperature below C. The mixture was then stirred at '-55 C. for 1.5 hours and then further stirred at tiff- C. until complete solution was effected. Three moles of diethanolamine were then added to the hot reaction mixture at such a rate as not to permit the reaction temperature to exceed C'., and stirring was 4 continued until the exothermic reaction subsided. The product was a yellow, oily liquid.
Example 2 Three moles of n-octanol-l' were substituted for the alcohol mixture used in Example 1.. Theproduct was a clear liquid.
Example I? A, mixture, of 1.5 moles of nrhexancl l and 1.5. moles of cetyl alcohol was. substituted for the alcohol mixture used in Example 1. The prodnot was a. soft grease.
Example 4 The procedure was as in Example. 1, but three moles of Ocenol (octadecenol-l) were used, yielding a dark brown thick oil.
Example 5 The procedurev was as in Example. 1, but: instead of: diethanolamine. 3 moles of triethanolamine were used. The product was a red-brown heavy oil.
4 Example 7 The procedure was as in Example 1, except using 3 moles of morpholine. This gave a clear, medium-viscosity, red brown oil.
Example 8 The procedure was as in Example 1, except using 3 moles of dimethylethanolamine. A reddish oil was obtained.
Example 9 The procedure was as in Example 1, except using 3 moles of methyldiethanolamine. The product was; a yellow oil.
Example 10 V The procedure was as in Example 2, except using 2.75 moles of octanol-l to 1 mole of P205. The product was a yellow brown grease.
Example 11 The procedure was as in Example 2, except using 3.75 moles of octanol-l to 1 mole. of P205. The product was yellow orange oil.
Eaample 1.2 In a manner similar to Examples 10 and 11, by varying the proportion of alcohol to P205 in the first part of the process, the followingthree compositions of matter were prepared and isolated:
(b) the diethanolamine salt of dilauryl phos- (.c) and equimolecular mixture of (a) and (b).
These were used for the tests described in Example l9 hereinbelow.
PART B.-APPLICATION The evaluation of electrostatic properties in the examples hereinbelowwas carried out. essentially as follows: V
A small piece of hydrophobic fabric (approximately l x' 5") is. weighed; under conditions of controlled humidityand immersed for so see. in approximately 336-5 cc. of a 9.5. ethanol. solution of the anti-staticagent. conta ning- 1 g; oi the; agent. The fabric is removed, air-dried, and weighed again to provide a basis for calculatingthe pick-up of antiestatic agent. For comparative tests, a loading of 0.05% agent on nylon taffeta. was adopted as. standard.
A strip. 3: cm... wide is. then. cut off, and its electrical resistance. at a controlled. relative. humidity saltof monolauryl of; 25 is. measured on a special apparatus which separated by a comprises: two; electrodes; space of; 1.25 cmand having a potential difference of volts. The fabric. is held in place between the electrodes so as to provide a con ducting area 1.25 cm. long. and 3 cm. The reading' gives the resistance of this standard area in ohms. For practical purposes the results are rated. as. follows:
(The rating or the untreated control in the non-cellulosic, hydrophobic fibers herein discu sed is usually 1111-) Example 1 3 Each agent whose preparation is described in Examples 1 to 11 was applied separately to nylon, polyacrylonitrile and polyethylene terephthalate woven fabrics. This was done by padding for approximately 30 seconds in 250 parts by weight of 95% ethanol containing 1 part by weight of the anti-static agent. After wringing the fabrics to wet pick-ups of 0.1-0.3 (ratio of liquid to dry fabric by weight), the fabrics were air-dried. Active ingredient loadings of 0.04-0.12% (based on dry weight or" fabric) were then obtained. Electrical resistance of the treated fabrics, as measured by the above-described standard method, were as follows:
Anti-static Product Rating Excellent. Very good.
Example 14 Example 15 Nylon, polyacrylonitrile and polyethylene terephthalate fabrics were treated by the method of Example 13, using the product of Example 1 in ethanol solutions of sufiiciently increased ccncentrations to produce loadings of 2.0% by weight. Th treated fabrics had anti-static ratings of excellent. The coatings were of a lubricative nature, but they were not objectionably oily.
Example 16 200 parts of the product of Example 1 were dispersed in 250 parts or water containing 3.5 parts of a sodium alliylsulfate prepared from higher alcohols averaging C10. The resulting emulsion was mixed very vigorously and 200 parts of a high boiling white mineral oil (boilin range, coo-350 C.) were stirred in. The resulting paste had an active ingredient content of 61 A spinning finish bath was prepared by dispersing 100 of this paste in 500 g. of water. plied to nylon filament immediately after extrusion of the melt, by passing the filament tangentially over a glass wheel revolving in the bath. In this manner loadin s of the anti-static agent amounting to from 0.05 to 0.4% by weight of the filament were obtained. The anti-static rating of the treated fibers was excellent.
In this same manner nylon fiber has been trea with numerous other anti-static agents falling within the above general formula. In every Since the water pick-up of It was apcase an excellent anti-static effect was imparted to the fiber.
Example 17 To parts of an emulsion of medium viscosity mineral oil (40 sec. white oil) in water containing 11.2% oil, 3 parts of the alkyl phosphate described in Example 1 were added. This mixture was run through a Disper-mil, and a homogeneous emulsion was obtained. It contained 11.2% oil solids, 3% anti-static agent and 85.8% water.
In substantially the same manner as described in Example 13, a loading of 0.5% total finish was applied to nylon fiber, giving approximately 0.11% of the anti-static agent on the fiber. The fiber had an anti-static rating of excellent.
When the same procedure was applied to polyacrylonitrile fiber and to polyethylene terephthalate fiber, similar, high anti-static effects were obtained.
Example 18.Com;oatibility with. com'ng oils Five parts of the composition described in Example 1 were dissolved in 100 parts of butyl palmitate (a conventional coning oil) usin approximately 5 parts of ocenol as solubilizin agent. The resulting solution was applied to nylon fiber by passing the fiber over a roll in contact with the oil. The treated fiber was found to have an anti-static rating of good to excellent.
Example 19. uperiority of mixed agents (a) The bis-diethanolamine salt of monolauryl phosphate was applied to nylon from an alcoholic bath, in the manner described in Example 13, to produce various loadings ranging from 0.04 to 0.12% by weight. In all cases, the anti-static qualities of the fabric were found to rate poor to fair, on the above standard table. (b) When the diet-hanolamine salt of dilauryl phosphate was tested in the same manner and in the same range of loadings, the treated fabric tested good.
(0) In the same manner an agent made from three moles of diethanolamine and a 1:1 molar mixture of monoand dilauryl phosphate was tested and found to have an anti-static rating of very good.
It will be understood that the details of the above examples and procedures may be varied widely, within the skill of those en aged in this art. 7
Thus, in the synthesis of the agent, the reaction between phosphorus pentoxide and the selected alcohol (or mixture of alcohols) and the subsequent reaction between the intermediate esters thus obtained with the selected oxy-alkylene amine, are both exothermic and require cooling; but the ultimate temperature maintained during each step of the reaction may be anywhere between 20" and 100 C.
The products can be applied to hydrophobic fibers in several ways. Filaments may be treated immediately after extrusion of the hydrophobic melt or solution. A tow of many threads of spun filament may be treated at some stage prior to the crimper, as in the manufacture of staple fiber. The agents may also be applied in the coning or winding oil, in a sizing bath or in a padding bath for fabric or skeins.
For the purpose of comparison, many agents of a chemical structure falling outside the limits of the generic formula hereinabove have been tested by me by the same standardprocess as hereinabove. The following tables show the antistatic ratings thus obtained. All tables refer to esters obtained as above by reacting a mixed alkyl phosphate (1 mole P2053 moles of the respective alcohol) with an oxy-alkylene amine as named in each case.
binol). di-isopropyl methyl (from di-isopi'opyl carbiu0l) mixed hfiptyl and higher alkyl (secondary, branched).
D0. oxy-bisethylene (from diethylene glycol) fair. mixed 11-0 and higher alkyl oxy-bisethylene Do. the radical of blown castor oil poor. the radical of raw castor oil Do.
TABLE IL-USING THROUGHOUT THE MIXED ALKYL ESTER DEFINED IN EXAMPLE I Amine or base g igg dietlianolamine. excellent. monocthanolamine very good. triethauolarnine" Do. morpholine Do. dimethylethanolamine Do. methyldiethanolamine excellent. diethylenetriamine nil. beta-aminoethyl-ethanolam e poor glycine Do.
nil. pyridine Do. sodium hydroxide Do.
It is clear from the above tables that only when the alkyl radical is longer than Cs and only when the amine is an oxy-alkylene amine as above defined does the mixture of alkyl amine phosphates give anti-static ratings better than fair.
In addition, the preferred agents of this inven-- tion were tested for other qualities essential for their use in treating textiles, such as ease of dispersion, stability of the aqueous emulsion, rate of pick-up by the fiber, stability to heat and to storage, and compatibility with the other agents with which they were applied. In all cases my preferred agents as defined by the above general formula were found to rate good to very good.
All these qualities make my novel agents additionally valuable for use in spinning finishes, staple finishes, coning and winding oils and in sizing baths. Furthermore, they can be sprayed onto waste fibers which accumulate in textile processing mills, so that these scraps can be recovered by passing them through the picking and carding operations without interference by electrostatic charges.
As for the chemical nature of the fiber to be treated, this invention is applicable in general to non-cellulosic, hydrophobic textile fibers. Hereinabove we have discussed nylon, polyethylene terephthalate. .polyacrylonitrile and their various modifications. As instances of the V latter may be mentioned polymers of acrylonitrile :8 which have been modified by copolymerization with substantial amounts of other vinyl compounds such as vinyl pyridine, vinyl chloride, styrene or vinyl acetate; polyacrylonitrile which is mixed with other materials such as plasticizers, modifiers, etc.; linear polyesters of ethylene glycol and terephthalic acid which have been modified by the addition of up to 10 of other glycols and/or dibasic acids; and polyethylene terephthalate which is mixed with other materials such as plasticizers, modifiers, etc. These fibers are all well known in the literature, and many of them are common commercial products. See for instance, Carothers, U. S. P. 2,071,250; 2,071,253 and 2,130,948; Whinfield et al., U. S. P. 2,465,319; Jacobson, U. S. P. 2,436,926; Latham, U. S. P. 2,404,714 and Arnold, U. S. P. 2,491,471.
It will be understood that although this specification is concerned primarily with textile fibers, my novel agents may be applied also to the above indicated chemical materials in non-textile form, for instance sheets or shaped masses.
These agents are effective on any hydrophobic substrate which tends to accumulate an electrical charge. Such substrates may also include polyethylene, polystyrene, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinylidene chloride, copolymers of these chlorides with acrylonitrile, polytetrafluoroethylene, polychlorotrifiuoroethylene, copolymers of the latter two, polyvinyl fluoride. etc., in either fiber or massive form.
1. A process of improving the electrostatic qualities of non-cellulosic, hydrophobic textile fiber which comprises impregnating the same with a mixture of agents of the general formula wherein Alk represents a straight-chained, saturated primary aliphatic hydrocarbon radical of 8 to 16 C-atoms, NX represents an oxyalkylene amine selected from the group consisting of the ethanolamines, the N-methyl-ethanolamines and morpholine; :c is an integer not greater than 2, while y is the difierence between 3 and 2. A process of improving the electrostatic qualities of non-cellulosic, hydrophobic textile fiber which comprises impregnating the same with an agent comprising a diethanolamine salt of mixed monoand di-allzyl phosphates, the alkyl radical whereof is a straight-chained, saturated, aliphatic, primary, hydrocarbon radical of 8 to 16 C-atoms.
3. Non-cellulosic, hydrophobic textile fiber having incorporated therein from 0.02 to 2.0% by weight of an antistatic agent of the general formula wherein All: represents a straight-chained, saturated, aliphatic, primary, hydrocarbon radical of whereof is a straight-chained, saturated, alialiphatic, primary hydrocarbon radical of from phatic, primary hydrocarbon radical of 8 to 16 8 to 16 C-atoms.
5. Non-cellulosic, hydrophobic textile fiber fieffilences Cited in the file Of this Patent having incorporated therein from 0.02 to 2.0% by 5 NITED STATES PATENTS weight of a composition of matter being a substantially equimolecular mixture of monoalkyl- Number Name Date 2,005,619 Graves June 18, 1935 b1s(d1ethanolam1ne)-phosphate and dialkyl- 2,127,495 Tulleners Aug. 23, 1938 mono(d1ethanolam1ne)-phosphate, wherein the 2 413 428 Billings Dec 31 1946 alkyl radical is a. straight-chained, saturated, 10
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2005619 *||Nov 10, 1934||Jun 18, 1935||Du Pont||Esters of acids of phosphorus|
|US2127495 *||Jun 20, 1936||Aug 23, 1938||Shell Dev||Manufacture of nitrogen base salts of acid alkyl esters|
|US2413428 *||Nov 3, 1943||Dec 31, 1946||Monsanto Chemicals||Lubrication of textile fibers|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2742379 *||Feb 25, 1954||Apr 17, 1956||Du Pont||Treatment of textile fibers with antistatic agent and product thereof|
|US2842462 *||Dec 16, 1954||Jul 8, 1958||Bohme Fettchemie Gmbh||Antistatic synthetic textile material|
|US2912352 *||Apr 11, 1955||Nov 10, 1959||Dehydag Gmbh||Process of improving the surface qualities of carbohydrate-free, high-polymer compounds, and products obtained thereby|
|US2976186 *||Nov 27, 1957||Mar 21, 1961||Eastman Kodak Co||Treated textile fiber|
|US3113887 *||Apr 28, 1959||Dec 10, 1963||Mead Corp||Method for cast coating paper|
|US3230193 *||May 16, 1961||Jan 18, 1966||Du Pont||Polyurethanes stabilized by phosphines|
|US3236681 *||Sep 6, 1961||Feb 22, 1966||Monsanto Co||Expandable polymer particles having anti-electrostatic properties|
|US3428481 *||Jul 6, 1966||Feb 18, 1969||Du Pont||Antistatic lubricating composition for textile fibers|
|US3620824 *||Jun 3, 1968||Nov 16, 1971||Monsanto Co||White thermally stable polyether modified polyester fibers and method of production|
|US3634117 *||Feb 17, 1969||Jan 11, 1972||Glanzstoff Ag||A textile material coated with an ammonium dialkyl phosphate antistatic agent|
|US3852288 *||Oct 11, 1972||Dec 3, 1974||Du Pont||Process for color stable alkyl and alkenyl acid phosphate compositions|
|US4338440 *||Oct 14, 1980||Jul 6, 1982||Beckman Instruments, Inc.||Diaryl phosphate morpholinium salts|
|US4608289 *||Mar 8, 1984||Aug 26, 1986||Interface Research Corporation||Carpet containing sanitizing compounds and methods|
|US4647601 *||May 21, 1985||Mar 3, 1987||Interface Research Corporation||Self-sanitizing epoxy resins and preparation thereof|
|US4753749 *||Sep 23, 1987||Jun 28, 1988||Interface Research Corporation||Microbiocidal cleaning agent and preparation thereof|
|US4908209 *||May 5, 1988||Mar 13, 1990||Interface, Inc.||Biocidal delivery system of phosphate ester and method of preparation thereof|
|US4935232 *||Apr 27, 1987||Jun 19, 1990||Interface Research Corporation||Microbiocidal composition and method of preparation thereof|
|US4957948 *||Sep 9, 1988||Sep 18, 1990||Interface, Inc.||Biocidal protective coating for heat exchanger coils|
|US5024840 *||May 15, 1989||Jun 18, 1991||Interface, Inc.||Antimicrobial carpet and carpet tile|
|US5032310 *||Jun 22, 1990||Jul 16, 1991||Interface, Inc.||Microbiocidal cleansing and disinfecting formulations and preparation thereof|
|US5133933 *||Mar 7, 1990||Jul 28, 1992||Interface Research Corporation||Microbiocidal preservative|
|US5474739 *||Jul 27, 1992||Dec 12, 1995||Interface, Inc.||Microbiocidal composition|
|US5635192 *||Jun 6, 1995||Jun 3, 1997||Interface, Inc.||Biocidal polymeric coating for heat exchanger coils|
|US5639464 *||Jun 6, 1995||Jun 17, 1997||Interface, Inc.||Biocidal polymeric coating for heat exchanger coils|
|DE1091078B *||Dec 13, 1958||Oct 20, 1960||Glanzstoff Ag||Verfahren zur Behandlung von synthetischen Faeden, Fasern usw. zur Herabsetzung ihrer Neigung, sich elektrostatisch aufzuladen|
|DE1096322B *||Jan 7, 1959||Jan 5, 1961||Glanzstoff Ag||Verfahren zur antistatischen Avivage von Polyamid-Fasern oder -Faeden|
|DE1167787B *||Feb 16, 1960||Apr 16, 1964||Bayer Ag||Verfahren zur antielektrostatischen Ausruestung von Textilmaterialien|
|U.S. Classification||428/394, 252/8.84, 428/396, 252/8.61, 428/395, 558/133|
|International Classification||D06M13/292, D06M13/00|