Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2723316 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateNov 8, 1955
Filing dateApr 9, 1951
Priority dateApr 9, 1951
Publication numberUS 2723316 A, US 2723316A, US-A-2723316, US2723316 A, US2723316A
InventorsGoodell John D, Tenny Lode
Original AssigneeMinnesota Electrics Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Methods and apparatus for minimizing regenerative feedback
US 2723316 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)


signors to The Minnesota Electronics Corporation, St. Paul, Minn., a corporation of Minnesota Application April 9, 1951, Serial No. 220,064 3 Claims. 01. 179-1001 This invention relates to electro-acoustic systems, and

pertains more particularly to methods and apparatus for I minimizing the effects of regenerative feed-back therein.

In sound reinforcement systems consisting of microphones, electrical amplifiers and loud speakers, a limiting problem has been the feedback of a signal through a closed input-output-input loop. The most commonly experienced example of this occurs in simple public address systems wherein the output of the loud speaker feeds back into the system via the microphone, and in extreme cases causes sustained oscillation. However, in order to sustain any oscillation in a system of this character, it is necessary that the signal be fed back from the loud speaker to the microphone in suitable phase and magnitude. Under these conditions the signal will be continu ously re-amplified and regeneration will be built. up in the system to the maximum power output. Also, in all practical systems the frequency response of the enclosed loop will contain peaks, and as the operating level of the system is raised, the gain of one or more of these peaks will become unity or greater, resulting in sustained oscillation.

Accordingly, the principal object of the invention is to practically eliminate feed back in systems of the type referred to.

Another object is to provide apparatus that will overcome the aforementioned feed back difficulties which apparatus will be inexpensive to produce and which will require little attention in the operation thereof.

One feature of the instant invention residesin the provision of apparatus designed to shift the output frequency a certain number of cycles from the input frequency, such shift introducing neglible distortion of the signal, yet being highly effective in frustrating regeneration within the system.

The above objects, and other objects of the invention will be made more apparent hereinafter, are obtained by apparatus subsequently to be described and shown in the accompanying drawing, wherein:

Figure 1 is a schematic representation of the invention, this embodiment being primarily mechanical in nature, and

Figure 2 is a block diagram of another arrangement envisaged by the invention, this embodiment being primarily electrical.

Referring first to Figure 1 of the drawing, the system there depicted includes a microphone 10 and'an input amplifier 12, the output of which is fed to a recording head 14. The head 14 is operatively associated with a continuous magnetic tape loop 16 which has an assumed rotation in the direction indicated.

Circumferentially displaced from the recording head 14 is a play-back head 18 which head is conventionally connected through an output amplifier 20 to a loud speaker 22, thus introducing a time delay of neglible duration. A suitable erasing head 24 is interposed between the recording and play back heads for erasing the recorded sound after it has passed beneath the play back head 18,

thereby always presenting a demagnetized section of tape to the recording head 14for repetitive use. I

The rotative speed of the tape 'loop 16 is not constant, but is deliberately. made oscillatory at either a periodic or random rate to cause a frequency shift of all signals passing through the system. Consequently no signal is ever fed back repetitively at the same frequency.

It will of course be' appreciated that the precisefre- .quency shift should be left for empirical determination.

One convenient way of mechanically varying the. rotative speed ofthe, loop .16 is to employ a tape drive wheel 26 having avariable brake. member 28 in friction engagement with. the wheels periphery. A periodicand variable drag is imposed on the brake member 28 by an eccentric cam 30 thatv may be rotated by the same motor driving the wheel 26 or by a'fs'eparate device. Obviously there exists a wide choice of driving mechanisms when using the tape loop 16, and itshould also be understood that it is Within the purviewof'lthe invention to employ other types of storage mediums than the depicted magnetictape loop 16. A

Another approach to the solution of the problem of minimizing'the feed back is illustrated in Figure 2. In principle this arrangement is somewhat similar to the arrangement shown in Figure l,="but may be preferable from the standpoint of simplicity in that a fixed increment of frequency is added orsubtracted to each form appear ing in the signal. By adding a fixed increment or term of frequency .to each frequency term appearing in .the signal passing-.througl rthe system. it will .be observed that the frequency will be rapidly shifted in any regeneration process. Thus if a signal starts to regenerate within a peak in the response curve it is increased in frequency a each time it passes through the system and quickly reaches a frequency that is outside the region where the gain is adequate to produce oscillation. If a fixed term is subtracted from each component in a complex signal passing through a system, the result will be essentially the same.

While it is true that a signal appearing close to the frequency of which the system tends to oscillate may pass through the peak, it will not remain in the oscillatory band for any appreciable period. Even in a system where the gain at all frequencies is sufficient to cause oscillation this method is designed to eliminate or at least greatly minimize serious feed back. It will of course be understood that the additive process raises all signals to a frequency above the transmission band of the system, and that the subtractive process lowers the signals to a level below the band. As a practical matter it may be desirable to divide the spectrum and use a subtractive process on low frequencies and an additive process on high frequencies. Under many conditions the peaks will appear only at the extremes of the spectrum and the method may not be needed in the middle range. It is also true that at the high end of the spectrum the shift in observed pitch will be less for a given added constant term than at the low end. Thus a relatively large term might be added to the upper frequencies and a relatively small term subtracted at the lower frequencies. Obviously, rapid attenuation beyond the frequency limits necessary for satisfactory intelligibility will facilitate the processes described.

added as a constant is generated by a suitable phase shift oscillator 34, the result being the obtaining of sine and cosine versions of the frequency increment to be added. The sine version of the main signal and the cosine version of the incremental frequency are impressed on a multiplier 36, such as a balanced modulator, while the cosine Patented Nov. 8, 1955 version of the signal and the sine version of the incremental frequency are similarly impressed on a second multiplier 38. The outputsfrom the two multipliers 36 and 38 are added together in a suitablemixing circuit 40. The sum signal is amplified by the poweramplifier 20 and then fed to the loud speaker 22.

It can readily be shown that the output of the mixer circuit 40 will contain the components of the input signal with the constant term of the. fixed frequency added to each component. Other terms will cancel out and with suitable linear networks no inter-modulation components will be introduced.

Similar methods may be used for subtraction. However, it should be noted in either case that the harmonic relationships will be somewhat disrupted by. this process and this is likely to be the limiting factor with respect to the dimensions of the constant term to be added or subtracted. As in the embodiment of Figure 1, the exact frequency tobe added or subtracted may be readily ascertained by simple experimentation. Within reasonable limits the incremental frequency selected should have no significant eflect upon intelligibility.

In accordance wifl1 the patent statutes, the principles of the methods and apparatus for minimizing the effects of regenerative feed back have been described, and while it has been endeavored to set forth the best embodiments therein, it is desired to have it understood that obvious changes maybe made within the scope of the following claims without departing from the spirit of they present invention.

We claim: i

1. A system for minimizing regenerative feedback comprising means for accepting an input signal, phase shift means for producing sine and cosine versions of said input signal, means for producing sine and cosine versions of an incremental frequency, and mixing means for combining the various sine and cosine versions to produce a output signal having a frequency diflTering slightly from that of said input signal.

2. A system for minimizing regenerative feedback comprising a microphone, means for accepting'an input signal into the system via the microphone, means for recording said signal at a constantly varying rate, a speaker, the microphone being in sound wave receiving relation with said speaker, and means for playing back the recorded signal via said speaker to produce an output signal having a frequency varying from that'of the input signal.

3. A system for minimizing regenerative feedback comprising a microphone, means for accepting an input signal into the system via the microphone, a continuous loop of magnetic tape, means for rotating the tape loop at a constantly varying rate, means for recording said input signal on the tape, a speaker, the microphone being in sound wave receiving relation with said speaker, means for playing back the recorded signal to obtain an output signal via the speaker, and means for thereafter erasing said recorded signal.

References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,177,769 Erickson Oct. 31, 1939- 2,286,072 Dudley June 9, 1942 2,373,560 Hanert Apr. 10, 1945 2,397,579 Veritch Apr. 2, 1946 2,424,633 Rieber July 29, 1947 2,593,113 Cutler Apr. 15, 1952

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2177769 *Dec 24, 1938Oct 31, 1939Frank I Du Frane Company IncLoud-speaking intercommunicating system
US2286072 *Dec 22, 1939Jun 9, 1942Bell Telephone Labor IncTreatment of speech waves for transmission or recording
US2373560 *Jul 29, 1941Apr 10, 1945Hammond Instr CoSound recording method and apparatus
US2397579 *May 19, 1944Apr 2, 1946Interval Instr IncSound reproducing system
US2424633 *May 19, 1944Jul 29, 1947Interval Instr IncAcoustic reservoir for use in a magnetic sound recording and reproducing system
US2593113 *Dec 29, 1950Apr 15, 1952Bell Telephone Labor IncRegenerative frequency shifting and pulse shaping circuit
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3110770 *Aug 29, 1960Nov 12, 1963Faraday Electronic Instr LtdApparatus for use in stethoscopy
US3257510 *Oct 15, 1962Jun 21, 1966Ind Res Products IncFeedback control apparatus
US3429999 *Sep 6, 1966Feb 25, 1969Collins Radio CoCircuit for preventing singing in audio systems
US3673567 *Oct 28, 1970Jun 27, 1972Mcclellan John F SrRemote dog-bark suppressor
US3944743 *Jan 7, 1974Mar 16, 1976Plantronics, Inc.Method and apparatus for feedback suppression
US4879749 *Feb 12, 1988Nov 7, 1989Audimax, Inc.Host controller for programmable digital hearing aid system
US4965833 *Aug 16, 1988Oct 23, 1990Mcgregor ThomasVoice enhancer system
U.S. Classification360/8, 381/83, 369/60.1
International ClassificationH04R3/02
Cooperative ClassificationH04R3/02
European ClassificationH04R3/02