Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2777766 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJan 15, 1957
Filing dateJun 4, 1952
Priority dateJun 4, 1952
Publication numberUS 2777766 A, US 2777766A, US-A-2777766, US2777766 A, US2777766A
InventorsBinder William O
Original AssigneeUnion Carbide & Carbon Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Corrosion resistant alloys
US 2777766 A
Abstract  available in
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Unite rates 277L765 Patented Jan. 15, 1957 2,777,766 coRRosioN RESISTANT ALLOYS William 0. Binder, Niagara Falls, N. Y., assignor to UHIOI] Carbide and Carbon Corporation, a corporation of New York No Drawing. Application June 4, 1952, Serial No. 291,813

4 Claims. (Cl. 75-134) This invention relates to corrosion-resistant alloys. Media causing corrosion of metals may be classified solutions.

object of this invention to provide alloys which It is an have useful resistance to both OXldlZlHg and reducing It is also an object of the invention to provide such alloys which are hot-workable.

The invention by means of which this object is achieved comprises chromium-nickel-molybdenum-iron alloys in which the proportions of balanced with respect to one another to attain the best combination of properties. The alloys of the invention contain 18% to 25% chromium; 35% to 50% nickel; 2% to 12% molybdenum; 0.1% to of tantalum or columbium or both; up to 5% tungsten; up to 2.5% copper; the remainder iron and incidental impurities; the iron content being not less than 15%. As is customary with alloys of this general nature, the alloys may contain up to 1.5% manganese and up to 0.5% silicon. Carbon is of course present unavoidably, but should not exceed 0.25% and is preferably kept as low as possible, for example less than 0.1%.

Much experimental work has shown that chromium is the most effective element in the alloys of the invention for imparting resistance to oxidizing corrosives and that nickel and molybdenum are the most effective elements for imparting resistance to reducing corrosives.

and molybdenum against reducing corrosives, and nickel and molybdenum tending to lessen the eifectiveness of chromium against oxidizing corrosives, they are balanced in the alloys of the invention so that the effectiveness of each is retained insofar as possible. Since tungsten also works against chromium with regard to resistance to oxidizing corrosives, it is also taken into account when balancing the efiective chromium content against the nickel content. From this experimental work, the follow ing relationship was derived:

Percent Cr% (percent Mo+0.3 (percent W) 6.6 (percent Ni) The left hand side of this equation represents effective chromium. To attain the optimum resistance to both present in the alloys of the invention. Within the range Percent Cr+2(percent Mo) +V2 (percent W)+ 4(percent Ta) +2.5 (percent Cb) =6.8(percent Ni) As in the case of the first equation, for the most consistently efiective resistance, the alloys of the invention should be so balanced in composition that the left hand side of of the equation is at least equal to the right hand side.

In a properly balanced alloy the elements columbium and tantalum, in addition to improving pit resistance,

rosion resistance is required after Welding, the alloys should be annealed by heating to 1100 C. to 1150 C. followed by cooling relatively rapidly.

To provide good resistance to oxidizing media after welding and stress-relieving, about 1% of columbium or tantalum is required when the molybdenum content is If the molybdenum content is higher, say 6%, it is preferred to add 2% of these elements to the alloy. Tantalum and columbium may be present together, and although they may be present in any ratio, a 1:1 ratio is preferred for economic reasons.

For optimum resistance to pitting after welding and stress-relieving, the nickel content of the alloys should be Percent Composition; Remainder Fe and 1 5% Max. Mn and 0.5% Max. Si

Alloy No.

Results obtained in one 48-hour period.

overcome by increasing the chromium and molybdenum contents. Since the latter elements promote the decomposition of the solid solution, it is important not to increase the amount of these elements beyond that required to overcome the influence of nickel.

Copper may be present in the alloys of the invention in minor proportions as an impurity. It may be added as an alloying constituent, and relatively small proportions of copper are beneficial in increasing the resistance to corrosion of the alloys in reducing acids such as dilute hydrochloric acid and sulfuric acid in concentrations of about to 50%. Resistance to attack by hot phosphoric acid is also enhanced by the presence of copper. Although copper is beneficial in quantities up to 2.5%, larger quantities tend to lower the resistance of the alloys to pitting and contact corrosion. Therefore the alloys generally should contain not more than 2.5% copper, and a preferred range is 0.25% to 1%. In these small proportions copper may be omitted from consideration in the equations above set forth despite indications that in the alloys of this invention copper behaves like nickel and somewhat more powerfully.

Many hundreds of tests of the alloys of the invention have been made, and such tests have demonstrated that the alloys possess useful resistance to oxidizing corrosives, reducing corrosives and solutions of the type which cause pitting. For such tests samples 1 inch wide, 1% inches long and .4 inch thick were machined from A inch plate which had been rolled directly (at initial rolling temperature of 1150 C. to 1200 C.) from ingots 2 inches square. The samples were heated 30 minutes at, 1100 C.', cooled in air, descaled in a nitric acid- 2% hydrofluoric acid bath at 70 C., drilled for mounting, and polished. Before immersion in the testing so lutions, each sample was degreased and carefully measured and weighed.

Different samples prepared as described were immersed in four different media; boiling 65% nitric acid; boiling 10% sulfuric acid; aerated 10% hydrochloric acid at 70 C. and 5% ferric chloride-10% sodium chlo ride at C. The samples were suspended in the acids for three 48 hour periods being removed and weighed between periods, and results of three such 48 hour pel'iOds were averaged. in the chloride solution the samples were placed on the solution to simulate a concentration cell and to obtain an indication of the resistance of the sample to contact corrosion. The samples were kept in the chloride solution for 72 consecutive hours;

l0 Nickel stabilizes the bottom of the glass jar holding A Typical of the results obtained set forth in the following table. the acids are expressed in terms of inches per month in the table.

in such tests are those The corrosion rates in penetration Results of Corrosion Tests Average Corrosion Rate, Inch Penetration per Month Boiling 05 i Boiling 10% N itl'ic Acid Sulphuric Aerated 10% 5% FeC1 10% NaCl Hydrochloric at 25 0., 72 Hours Acid at 70 C.

No pitting. Do. Do.

It will be seen from the above table that the alloys of the invention possess useful resistance to oxidizing media, reducing media, and to chloride solutions.

That the alloys of the invention are hot-workable is demonstrated byhot-twist tests. In such tests a hotrolled sample consisting of a round bar about 22 inches long by /4 inch in diameter and having a reduced section about 8 inches long and /8 inch diameter in the center is twisted to failure. The reduced section is heated uniformly for a distance of about 3 /2 inches on each side of the center, and the bar is twisted at a constant speed of revolutions per minute. The total number of twists and the initial torque are observed. In the following table typical test results are compared with typical results obtained on conventional stainless steels. Alloy A in the table is an alloy according to this invention containing 22% chromium; 45% nickel; 6% molybdenum; 1% columbium; 1% tantalum; 1.5% manganese; 0.5% silicon; remainder iron. Alloy B is a steel containing 19% chromium; 9% nickel; 1.3% manganese; 0.4% silicon; 0.08% carbon; remainder iron and Alloy C is a steel containing 18% chromium; 15% nickel; 3% molybdenum; 1.5% manganese; 0.5%

silicon; 0.05% carbon; remainder iron.

Test Noni Alloy Temp, Torque, Twists (J. in.-lb. Before Fracture.

The data in the above table show the high order oi hotworkability which can be obtained from a Well b lanced alloy in accordance with this invention.

In general, the maximum hot-working temperature range for the alloys is 1150 to 1175 C. For optimum hot-workability the extreme limits of the broad composition range should be avoided as the alloys decrease in hot-workability as the chromium and molybdenum contents increase. The addition of tantalum benefits the hot-workability of the alloys, and it is more helpful than columbium.

The alloys of the invention may be welded by conventional methods.

7s A specific alloy according to the invention which has to 25% chromium; 35% to 50% nickel; 2% to 12? molybdenum; 0.1% to 5% in the aggregate of at lea:

chromium; 45% nickel; 6% molybdenum; 1% columbium; one metal selected from the group consisting of tantalur 1% tantalum; 1.5% maganese; 0.5% silicon; 0.05% and columbium; up to 5% tungsten; up to 2.5% coppel carbon; the remainder iron. 5 less than 0.25% carbon; the remainder iron and incidenta This 1s a continuation-in-part of my application Serial impurities, the 11'011 content being at least 15 and thl No. 100,769, filed June 22, 1949, now abandoned.

at is claimed is:

ductng-t e corrosive media, which article is composed sides thereof: of an alloy consisting of 18% to 25% chromium; 35% to 50% nickel; 2% to 12% molybdenum; 0.1% to 5% in the aggregate of atleast one metal selected from the (Percent W))=6'6(Percent NOD25 group consisting of tantalum and columbium; up to 5% Per ent Cr+2(percent Mo)+ /z(percent W)+ tungsten; up to 2.5% copper; less than 0.25% carbon; 4(percent Ta) +2.5(percent Cb)=6.8(percent Ni) the remainder iron and incidental impurities, the iron Percent Cr /3 (percent Mo+0.3

An alloy article resistant to corrosive mediaof the of said alloy being so proportioned that the left hand oxiflilmg f p the Tedllclng yp and the Plttlng iype, which article 1s composed of an alloy having substani h h i tially the following composition: 22% chromium; 45 nickel; 6% molybdenum; 1% columhium; 1% tantalum; Percent Cr (Percent 1 5% maximum manganese; 0.5% maximum silicon; less (Percent W))=6'6(Pe1'cent Nno'zfi han 0.1% carbon; the remainder iron and incidental 2. An alloy article resistant to pitting-type corrosive lmpurltles? media, which article is composed of an alloy consisting of 18% to 25% chromium; 40% to 50% nickel; 2% to 12% molybdenum; 0.1% to 5% in the aggregate of at least one metal selected from the group consisting of References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,162,253 Grossman June 13, 1939 tantalum and columhlum; up to 5% tungsten; up to 1% 2,245,366 Rohn et aL June 10 1941 copper; less than 0.25 0 carbon; the remainder iron and 2,373,490 Mohling Apr. 10, 1945 incidental impurities, the iron content being at least 15% 2,403,128 Scott et a1. July 2, 4 and the individual constituents of said alloy being so 2,423,738 Thielemann July 8 1947" proportioned that the left hand side of the following 2,432,617 Franks et aL Dec. 16, 1947 equation is at least equal to the right hand side: 2,451,547 German Oct 19 1948 Percent Cr+2(percent M0)+ (pe1cent W)+ 2,504,453 Rotherham et al. Apr. 18, 1950 4(percent Ta) +2.5(percent Cb)=6.8(percent Ni) 2,553,330 Post et al. May 15, 1951 OTHER REFERENCES Iron Age, vol. 161, March 18, 1948, pages 73-75.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2162253 *Apr 25, 1939Jun 13, 1939Joel Grossman CornellDental casting alloy
US2245366 *Dec 24, 1938Jun 10, 1941Franz BollenrathHardening cobalt-nickel-chromiumiron alloys
US2373490 *Jan 23, 1943Apr 10, 1945Allegheny Ludlum SteelHeat-resisting alloys
US2403128 *Jun 24, 1942Jul 2, 1946Westinghouse Electric CorpHeat resistant alloys
US2423738 *Mar 1, 1941Jul 8, 1947Gen ElectricForgeable alloy for hightemperature use
US2432617 *Jun 13, 1945Dec 16, 1947Electro Metallurg CoFerrous alloys for high temperature use
US2451547 *Jan 9, 1942Oct 19, 1948Driver Harris CoAlloy
US2504453 *Jan 23, 1948Apr 18, 1950Thos Firth & John Brown LtdAlloy steels for use at elevated temperatures
US2553330 *Nov 7, 1950May 15, 1951Carpenter Steel CoHot workable alloy
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2981621 *Jul 29, 1957Apr 25, 1961Sierra Metals CorpHigh temperature nickel-iron base alloy
US2994605 *Mar 30, 1959Aug 1, 1961Gen ElectricHigh temperature alloys
US3069258 *Jul 31, 1959Dec 18, 1962Int Nickel CoNickel-chromium casting alloy with niobides
US3177074 *Apr 23, 1962Apr 6, 1965Duriron CoCobalt base alloys
US3492117 *Oct 21, 1966Jan 27, 1970Int Nickel CoCorrosion resistant stainless type alloys
US3516826 *Aug 14, 1968Jun 23, 1970Int Nickel CoNickel-chromium alloys
US3930904 *Oct 29, 1974Jan 6, 1976The International Nickel Company, Inc.Nickel-iron-chromium alloy wrought products
US4088478 *Dec 16, 1976May 9, 1978Carondelet Foundry CompanyNickel, chromium, molybdenum, copper, silicon, carbon, iron, manganese, tungsten, tantalum, niobium
US4201575 *May 18, 1979May 6, 1980Carpenter Technology CorporationAustenitic stainless corrosion-resistant alloy
US4329173 *Mar 31, 1980May 11, 1982Carondelet Foundry CompanyAlloy resistant to corrosion
US4358511 *Oct 31, 1980Nov 9, 1982Huntington Alloys, Inc.Tube material for sour wells of intermediate depths
US4788036 *Oct 1, 1986Nov 29, 1988Inco Alloys International, Inc.Pitting, stress, chemical resistance; ductility; workability; oil well equipment
US5011659 *Mar 22, 1990Apr 30, 1991Carondelet Foundry CompanyCastable corrosion resistant alloy
US5429690 *Mar 23, 1989Jul 4, 1995Heubner; UlrichMethod of precipitation-hardening a nickel alloy
US5516485 *Mar 17, 1994May 14, 1996Carondelet Foundry CompanyWeldable cast heat resistant alloy
US20120012665 *Jan 18, 2011Jan 19, 2012Yehuda IvriAerosol generators with enhanced corrosion resistance
DE1608180B1 *Oct 20, 1967May 25, 1972Int Nickel LtdVerwendung einer nickel-chrom-stahl-legierung
DE3221833A1 *Jun 9, 1982Dec 30, 1982Sumitomo Metal IndLegierung, insbesondere zur herstellung von hochbelastbaren verrohrungen von tiefbohrungen oder dergleichen
EP0136998A1 *Aug 7, 1984Apr 10, 1985Voest-Alpine Stahl AktiengesellschaftWrought nickel-base alloy and process for its thermal treatment
EP0329777A1 *Aug 26, 1988Aug 30, 1989CHAS. S. LEWIS & CO., INCAir meltable castable corrosion resistant alloy
EP0601915A1 *Dec 2, 1993Jun 15, 1994Sima S.A.Nickel base alloy of the quaternary system Ni-Fe-Cr-Mo, gamma prime precipitation-hardening and resisting to corrosive environments, typically occurring in the oil industry
EP0693565A2Jul 18, 1995Jan 24, 1996Haynes International, Inc.Copper containing Ni-Cr-Mo Alloys
WO1989009292A1 *Mar 23, 1989Oct 5, 1989Vdm Nickel TechHardenable nickel alloy
Classifications
U.S. Classification420/586.1, 420/582
International ClassificationC22C30/00, C22C19/05
Cooperative ClassificationC22C30/00, C22C19/055
European ClassificationC22C19/05P4, C22C30/00