Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2819049 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJan 7, 1958
Filing dateJul 7, 1953
Priority dateJul 7, 1953
Publication numberUS 2819049 A, US 2819049A, US-A-2819049, US2819049 A, US2819049A
InventorsKaemmerlen Jr Cyril J, Manning Jr Earl
Original AssigneeShell Dev
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Bubble cap towers
US 2819049 A
Abstract  available in
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Jan. 7, 1958 E. MANNING, JR, ET AL BUBBLE CAP TOWERS Filed July 7, 1953 Fig.4-

mmrkzn JR.

.m m n r wwm T H /m Pmc h T United S tates Patent Q BUBBLE CAP TOWERS Earl Manning, Jr., Houston,

len, Jr., Charlotte, meut Company, Delaware Tex., and Cyril J. Kaemmer- N. C., assignors to Shell Develop- Emeryville, Califi, a corporation of The invention relates to improvements in contacting towers having tray decks provided with bubble caps or bell caps, suitable for use in contacting liquid with gas, e. g., in fractional distillation of petroleum oils and other liquids, in gas scrubbers, and the like.

In the usual bubble cap design the cap assembly includes a riser tube communicating with the vapor space beneath the tray deck and extending above the upper level of the deck so as to retain on the deck a body of liquid even without upflow of vapor. The vapor-deflecting cap proper is positioned above the riser tube and has a skirt generally of the same geometric shape as the riser tube, but enclosing a horizontal area greater than that of the riser tube, extending downwards in horizontally spaced relation to the tube so as to provide a down-flow passage. Vapor ascends through the tube and after emerging from the top reverses direction and descends in the down-flow passage between the riser tube and skirt; it eventually flows out beneath the skirt or through openings in the lower part of the skirt into the body of liquid on the tray deck. These changes in direction of vapor flow cause turbulence and impose friction losses that severely limit the vapor handling capacity of the bubble caps. Attempts to reduce pressure drops by streamlining the riser tube and bubble caps have only partially alleviated this difliculty, and the use of larger riser tubes and caps reduces the number of caps that can be fitted on a tray of a given size.

It is an object of this invention to provide an improved tray deck with a bubble cap wherein reduced pressure drops are produced by given rates of vapor flow and/ or wherein increased rates of vapor flow are possible for a cap of a given size and for a given permissible pressure drop. Ancillary thereto, it is an object to provide a construction wherein the total area for upflow of vapor is increased in relation to the total area of a tray deck.

A further object is to provide a simple, unitary bubble cap device that is easily installed on the deck.

In summary, according to the invention, the deck has a vapor opening or passageway, the top of which terminates substantially at the level of the deck, i. e., no vapor riser tube that extends above the tray deck is provided, and a vapor-deflecting cap is mounted directly over the passageway, the deck and cap being arranged so that the top of the vapor passageway is in free horizontal communication at the level of the deck with the body of liquid which is supported on the tray deck by the dynamic action of the vapor that escapes laterally from the assembly. The sides of the vapor passageway are preferably smooth and upwardly convergent with a throat near to the top,

and may be constituted by the deck itself, e. g., by cutting a hole into the deck if of sufiicient thickness, or by punching the deck to form a downwardly projecting lip or flange, or the sides of the passageway may be constituted by a separate tube that extends downwardly through the deck. The cap deflects the vapors laterally outwards and for best results is streamline-d by giving it a downwardly concave ceiling that slopes upwardly and outwardly from the center and advantageously terminates at the highest point thereof at the outer part of the cap and is in free communication with the outside at that height, thereby differing from deflectors that were mounted within bubble caps according to prior designs, wherein the curved surfaces were arched and continued downwardly from the highest parts thereof to merge with the skirt for reversing the direction of vapor flow and inducing the vapor to flow downwards through the down-flow passage between the skirt and the riser tube. The bubble caps according to this invention do not have such downfiow passage. For greatest economy of deck space and to permit many caps to be fitted it is desirable in the construction according to the invention to make the outline of the cap (in horizontal plan) substantially the same as that of the vapor passage way thereby providing a relatively greater total area of vapor passageway for a tray deck of a given area and further departing from prior arrangements wherein the vapor riser tube had a horizontal area materially smaller than that of the cap.

The cap, which may be formed separately from or attached permanently to the tube, e. g., made integral therewith, can according to a preferred construction be conveniently secured to the deck by inserting it upwardly through a hole in the deck and sliding one or more wedges hroizontally into slits formed in the cap structure, the wedges then resting on the deck.

The invention will be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings illustrating certain preferred embodiments by way of illustration, wherein:

Figure l is a vertical sectional view through an intermediate portion of a fractionating tower provided with tray decks according to the invention;

Figure 2 is an enlarged vertical sectional view of a portion of the deck showing one bubble cap device taken on the broken line 22 of Figure 3;

Figure 3 is a view of the cap partly in plan and partly in section taken on the broken line 3-3 of Figure 2;

Figure 4 is a horizontal section through a tray deck showing cap device in elevation;

Figure 5 is a section view similar to Figure 4 showing a modified construction of the cap device; and

Figure 6 is a vertical sectional view of a further modified construction of the cap device and portion of the deck.

Referring to Figures 1-4 of the drawings in detail, 10 represents the shell of a fractionating column having flat, horizontal tray decks 11 extending transversely across the shell in vertically spaced relation and provided with downflow openings 12 situated alternately at opposed sides. The openings 12 are bounded by vertical plates 13 that are sealed at their vertical marginal edges to the shell 10 and extend above the respective trays to form overflow weirs 13a and extend downwardly below the levels of the weirs 13a on the respectively lower decks 11. The decks 11 are thereby adapted to retain bodies of liquid up to the heights of the weirs 13a and the plates 13 form peripherally enclosed liquid downcomers that are immersed within the retained liquid at their lower ends to prevent upfiow of vapor. Each tray deck has one or more bubble cap assemblies 14 constructed in accordance with the invention.

The bubble cap device is shown more particularly in Figures 2-4, which illustrate anembodiment wherein the device is unitary and is constructed of a single piece of metal, in addition to one or more locking wedges 15, 15a, etc. The cap device comprises a vertical tube 16, circular in cross section, that extends downwardly from the upper level of the tray deck for a distance at least A of the diameter at the narrowest part of the tube and has inner side surfaces that are smoothly upwardly conver-z gent; preferably, a throat 17 is formed near the top 18 and the tube diverges slightly above the throat. By way of example, the tube may have a throat diameter of six inches, bottom and top diameters of eight and six-and-onehalf inches, respectively, and a height of oneinch. Directly above the vapor passageway constituted by the said tube is a top wall 19 for deflecting vapors laterally outwardly. This wall preferably has the ceiling thereof formed as a smooth, concave, upwardly and outwardly inclined deflecting surface 20 that has the outermost part at the highest level thereof and substantially horizontal. In the embodiment shown, wherein the vapor opening is circular in cross section, the deflecting surface 20 is a surface of revolution about the axis of the vapor opening and has a 90 are as generatrix. This shape diifers from that employed in prior bubble caps having arched ceilings in that the surface does not turn downwardly through any appreciable arc, so that vapor will be discharged laterally in directions that are essentially horizontal. The wall 19 is united to the tube 16 by a small number of, e. g., four, narrow posts 21 that have their external surfaces coincident with a cylinder of diameter equal to the outside of the upper portion of the tube 16. These posts have vertical slots extending down to the level of the tray deck for receiving the locking wedges. To facilitate the upfiow of vapor through the vapor passageway the throat of the latter is made as large as possible in relation to the cap; hence, in the preferred embodiment the cap has an external outline that is substantially the same, both with respect to size and shape as the vapor passageway. In the embodiment illustrated, the external outline of the cap device is circular and the diameter of the upper part exceeds that of the vapor passageway which lies immediately above the throat 17 only by the thickness of the material used in the tube. The top wall according to this embodiment is provided with an annular skirt 22 that extends almost to the tray deck and has suitable openings, such as serrations 23, that extend upwards fully to the deflecting surface 20 to permit vapor to be discharged directly from the said surface. A plurality, e. g., four, lugs 24 are optionally formed integrally with the tube for engagement with the underside of the deck to position the tube entirely beneath the upper surface of the deck.

The cap device is attached to the tray deck by inserting it upwardly through a hole in the latter to bring the lugs 24 into abutment with the deck and securing the device by any suitable means, e. g., by inserting a plurality of thin vertical wedges 15, a, etc., radially inwards through slots formed in the posts 21. These wedges rest directly on the tray deck and have tapers less than the friction angle to insure tension under operating conditions.

According to the modification shown in Figure 5, the skirt 22 is omitted and the vapor is free to discharge laterally throughout the full height of the cap device except where obstructed by the narrow posts 21. A further modification shown in this view concerns the wedge arrangement. Here, a single wedge 25 is driven fully across the cap device and has tapered engagements with diametrically opposite posts. The wedge is situated diametrically in relation to the cap device and is thin, so as not to interfere with the free upflow of vapor. The lugs 24 are replaced by an annular flange 24a, which forms the abutment means for engaging the underside of the deck 11.

v .In Figure 6 the vapor passageway is formed by punching the tray deck 11 to form an annular lip that projects downwardly to form a short tube- 16a, the resulting vapor passageway again having smooth sides the top 18 of which is at the level of the deck 11. The cap 19 has a. deflectingsurface 20 as described above and is secured to ythe deck -by -postsp21fjthat have; horizontalztabs 26 which arebolte'cl or otherwise fixed to the deck. The cap may be fullyopen} at the sides. between the f posts, as shown, or provided with askirt as shown in Figures 2-4.

In all of the embodiments shown, the top of the vapor passageway is in free horizontal communication at the level of the top of the tray deck with the body of liquid that accumulates on the deck at least as high as the weir 13a during operation of the column. It will be understood that the column is provided with the usual means, such as a reboiler or vapor inlet at the bottom, for causing vapors to ascend through the vapor openings, and with means for charging liquid at the top, e. g., a reflux condenser, for accumulation on the trays and passage over the weirs 13a and through the downcomer openings 12 onto the respective lower trays. The ascending vapor emerges from the top 18 of each vapor passageway and makes only one, smooth change of direction, assisted by the surface 20, through a right angle;-hence it is discharged substantially horizontally outwards from the cap device both near the deck and at higher levels up to the surface 20 and comes into intimate contact with the liquid, entraining liquid to form a spray or froth that rises above the liquid level. By this entraining action the entry of liquid from the deck into the space beneath the deflecting surface and the consequent downflow of liquid through the vapor passageways are prevented and a contacting body of liquid is built up on the deck when the column is in operation; however, cessation of vapor flow permits the liquid to drain down through the vapor passages. It may be noted that the entraining action is entirely one of carrying the liquid radially outwardly from the vapor caps, as distinguished from devices, such as that of the U. S. Patent No. 2,523,126, wherein the vapor riser tube extends above the tray and liquid is drawn inwards into the tube.

The cap should be shaped to distribute the vapor in all directions at which the contacting body of liquid occurs so that the body of liquid on the tray deck is held back equally on all sides. This is achieved by forming the surface 20 as a surface of revolution, as described, although other geometric shapes will be apparent to those skilled in the art and would be used when the vapor passage is not circular.

The construction described leads to reduced pressure drops for given flow rates and cap sizes in relation to bubble caps of usual construction employing riser tubes. This advantage is particularly marked when operating at high vapor flow rates at which high pressure drops are encountered, and it was found that still higher flow rates can be used for the same pressure drop.

Example Some indication of the extent of the improvements may be had from the following data. The air flow rates corresponding to measured pressure drops were determined for a standard commercial bubble cap six inches in diameter with a riser tube and having serrated skirt, using a dry column. The flow rates that produce the same pressure drops were determined for bubble cap. assemblies according to the invention by modifying the commercial cap in the following respects:

A. The riser tube was removed, leaving a 4% in. vapor opening in the tray.

A-l. Same as A, but a plug providing a deflecting surface shaped like the surface 20 in Figure 2 was mounted within the cap.

A-2. Same as A, but a tube, shaped as shown for the tube 16 and of thin metal, was placed in the vapor opening entirely beneath the deck except for a thin supporting rim resting on the deck.

A-3. Both the plug of A-1 and the tube of A-2 were provided.

B. The riser tube was removed and the hole through the deck was enlarged to leave a vapor opening 6%: in.

in diameter. t

with a 6% in. vapor opening- The results were as follows:

A considerable increase in the vapor capacity was attained in all cases, and the data show that the several features specified in the appended claims are useful when employed separately or in combination. It may be noted that for the smaller vapor opening streamlining the tube alone (A-2) and the streamlining of the tube in conjunc-v tion with the streamlining of the deflector in the cap (A3) were particularly beneficial at the higher pressure drops, while for the larger diameter runs, the combination of the streamlined tube and streamlined deflector (B3) was particularly advantageous also at lower pressure drops.

We claim as our invention:

1. A bubble tower containing a tray deck which includes a flat, horizontal part adapted to support a body of liquid, said deck part having a single, substantially unobstructed vapor passageway extending therethrough and bounded by enclosing side surfaces that are situated substantially entirely beneath the level of the top of said deck part; and a vapor-deflecting cap device positioned directly over said vapor passageway and including a top wall spaced above the said deck part and a small number of narrow, peripherally located support members which collectively occupy only a small fraction of the cap periphery and the interior surfaces of which form substantial vertical extensions of said enclosing side surfaces, said top wall having an area and outline substantially the same as the area and outline of said vapor passageway and providing a downwardly concave, smooth deflecting surface having the lowest part at the center and rising to the outer periphery thereof, the said periphery being the highest part of the surface, to deflect vapor that ascends through the vapor passageway substantially through a right angle, said cap device being laterally open between said support members from said periphery of the deflecting surface to the said deck part and the space beneath the deflecting surface providing a free and direct path for the flow of vapor from the top of said vapor passageway to the cap periphery at the level of said deck part for the efllux of vapor laterally into said body of liquid throughout the full height of the cap device.

2. A unitary bubble cap device comprising a single vapor tube adapted to extend through an opening in a tray deck and having positioning means for engaging the under side of the deck so as to position the tube substantially wholly beneath the upper level of the deck, a vapordeflecting cap including a downwardly directed deflecting surface and peripherally located support posts joined to the top of said tube and to the cap, said posts being spaced apart to permit lateral discharge of vapor between them,

the lateral external dimensions of said posts and cap being limited to those of the upper part of the tube so that the device can be inserted through said opening from the bottom, and downwardly directed abutment means on the cap device adjacent the upper surface of the tray deck adapted to receive a horizontal wedge for securing the device.

3. In a bubble tower, the combination of a flat, horizontal tray deck having an opening therein and a bubble cap device including a vapor tube extending through said opening and situated at least partly beneath said tray deck. a vapor-deflecting cap situated above said tray deck and directly above said tube, and a side wall forming an upward extension of said tube and joined to said cap, said side wall having lateral discharge openings, abutment means on said tube in engagement with the under side of said deck, and at least one horizontal wedge resting on the upper side of said deck and extending through an opening in said side wall.

References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,878,467 Clarke Sept. 30, 1932 1,918,005 Urquhart July 11, 1933 2,084,726 Duey June 22, 1937 2,480,862 Johnson Sept. 6, 1949 2,523,126 Long Sept. 19, 1950 2,547,383 Glitsch Apr. 3, 1951 FOREIGN PATENTS 874,509 France May 4, 1942 884,837 France May 8, 1943

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1878467 *Jun 15, 1928Sep 20, 1932Clarke Nell MayApparatus for treating hydrocarbons
US1918005 *Feb 2, 1932Jul 11, 1933Urquhart Kenneth MBubble cap
US2084726 *Mar 23, 1936Jun 22, 1937Standard Oil Co CaliforniaBubble cap
US2480862 *Feb 6, 1946Sep 6, 1949Johnson Leon HBubble cap assembly for gas or vapor and liquid contact apparatus
US2523126 *Nov 20, 1947Sep 19, 1950Standard Oil Dev CoApparatus for countercurrent contact of fluid materials
US2547383 *Sep 29, 1947Apr 3, 1951Glitsch Engineering CompanyBubble cap riser
FR874509A * Title not available
FR884837A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3779524 *Aug 10, 1971Dec 18, 1973Mitsui Shipbuilding EngGas-liquid contacting apparatus
US3779525 *Aug 19, 1971Dec 18, 1973Mitsui Shipbuilding EngGas-liquid contacting apparatus
US3779526 *Aug 19, 1971Dec 18, 1973Mitsui Shipbuilding EngGas-liquid contacting apparatus
US3779527 *Aug 24, 1971Dec 18, 1973Mitsui Shipbuilding EngGas-liquid contacting apparatus
US3794305 *Mar 13, 1972Feb 26, 1974J Montz Gmbh FaApertured column tray provided with bubble caps
US3994977 *May 10, 1974Nov 30, 1976Basf AktiengesellschaftManufacture of formaldehyde
US4978616 *Sep 3, 1987Dec 18, 1990Verax CorporationFluidized cell cultivation process
WO1986005202A1 *Feb 6, 1986Sep 12, 1986Verax CorporationFluidized bioreactor and cell cultivation process
WO2017132519A1 *Jan 27, 2017Aug 3, 2017Woven Metal Products, Inc.Tray deck orifice device and methods of repairing a tray deck
Classifications
U.S. Classification261/114.2, 202/158
International ClassificationB01D3/14, B01D3/20
Cooperative ClassificationB01D3/205
European ClassificationB01D3/20B