Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2824970 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateFeb 25, 1958
Filing dateMar 30, 1953
Priority dateApr 4, 1952
Publication numberUS 2824970 A, US 2824970A, US-A-2824970, US2824970 A, US2824970A
InventorsHarald Ledin Sven
Original AssigneeHarald Ledin Sven
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Secondary diaphragms for x-ray radiography
US 2824970 A
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Feb. 25, 1958 Y s. H. LEDIN 2,824,970

SECONDARY DIAPHRAGMS FOR X-RAY RADIOGRAPHY Filed March 30, 1953 3 Sheets-Sheet l Feb. 25, 1958 s. H. LEDIN\ 2,824,970

SECONDARY DIAPHRAGMS FOR X-RAY RADIOGRAPHY Filed March so, 1953 3 Shets-Sheet 2 Feb. 25, 1958 s. H. LEDlN 2,

SECONDARY DIAPHRAGMS FOR X-RAY RADIOGRAPHY Filed March so, 1953 s Sheets-Sheet s United States SECONDARY DIAPI'RAGMS FOR X-RAY RADIOGRAPHY Sven Harald Ledin, Hagersten, Sweden Application March 30, 1953, Serial No. 345,662

Claims priority, application Sweden April 4, 1952 9 Claims. (Cl. 250-63) The present invention relates to X-ray radiography and more particularly to secondary diaphragms in connection therewith.

It is an object of the invention to provide such secondary diaphragms which are more efiective in providing sharp X-ray images than diaphragms hitherto known. Another object is to obtain the increased efi'ectivity with reasonable thick diaphragms and without the necessity of too exact orientation of the diaphragm.

In the reproduction of an image by means of X-ray radiation a source of radiation with as nearly as possible a pin-point focal spot throws a shadow-image of the object upon either a fluorescent screen or a photographic -film, possibly with intensifying screens. The contrast and definition in the shadow-image are dependent in the first place upon a very small source of radiation; i. e., a small radiating focal spot on the anode of the X-ray tube. For practical reasons, however, the focal spot must have a certain areal extent and must therefore introduce some lack of definition into the image. Another well-known and serious source of poor contrast and definition is the so called Compton effect which is a result of the secondary radiation of the object to be radiographed. The primary X-ray radiation penetrating the object gives rise to such secondary radiation, which is not directed from the focal spot of the X-ray tube but radiates instead from various points of the object in all directions. Consequently, the secondary radiation contributes extensively to the deterioration of the image.

In the art this injurious effect of the secondary radiation upon the image has long been supressed, to a certain degree. by the use of a secondary diaphragm immediately in front of the fluorescent screen or photographic film. This diaphragm consists of screening strips of heavy material, usually lead, placed on edge, and having such dimensions that the direct radiation is obstructed as little as possible while the secondary radiation, which deviates from the direction of the primary radiation, to a great extent is absorbed by the grid strips and is thus prevented from striking the screen or film. Such secondary diaphragms are constructed with screening strips of lead placed on edge and, as a rule, joined by separating strips of a material having only a slight capacity of absorption for the X-ray radiation passing through. The use i of such secondary diaphragms affords a notable improve- 'ment in contrast and definition in the image. Unfortunately, the aforementioned diaphragms can not suffi- 2,824,970 Patented Feb. 25, 1958 ice The present invention relates to such an improvement in secondary diaphragms of the type described that more satisfactory results may be obtained than heretofore in respect to contrast and finer structures in the reproductions. As in the constructions known in the art, the secondary diaphragm of this invention consists of a screening grid in the form of strips put on edge of highly absorbent material, such as lead, for the absorption of the greater part of the injurious secondary radiation. The characteristic feature of this invention lies in the fact that in the interstices of the screening grid of the sec ondary diaphragm, in the path of the radiation is introduced an absorbing material hereinafter denoted as discriminating material, of such nature that its K-absorption wavelength limit lies at a shorter wavelength than 7 A. The secondary radiation, which due to the Compton effect has obtained a greater wavelength than the image-producing primary radiation, will therefore be absorbed to a greater extent than the primary radiation. Inasmuch as secondary radiation is absorbed to a greater extent than the primary radiation by such material, the ratio between the useful radiation and the detrimental radiation will be improved, resulting in sharper contrast in the image. The denomination discriminating material has been selected because the material serves as a kind of discriminator through extensively obstructing the passage of the detrimental secondary radiation without obstructing the passage of the primary radiation to a disturbing degree, although the intensity of the primary radiation may be decreased to a certain extent.

The discriminating material may be introduced into the interstices of the screening grid or as a superficial layer over the edges of the strips of the screening grid on one or both sides of the grid. Or, it may be applied in one or both of the plates which frequently cover the screening grid proper.

The invention will now be described in greater detail, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:

Figs. 1 and 2 show the orientation and dimensioning of the screening grid strips. Fig. 1 illustrating a series of screening strips converging toward the focal spot and Fig. 2 representing a series of crossing strips.

Fig. 3a shows a cross section through a part of a screening grid, provided with two cover plates and wherein the discriminating material is constituted as an alloy.

Fig. 3b is a view similar to Fig. 3a and wherein the discriminating material is absorbed in a fibrous carrier material;

Fig. 3c is a view similar to Fig. 3a and wherein the discriminating material is included as filler in a carrier material consisting of a plastic;

Fig. 4 is a diagram showing the intensity of the X-ray radiation as a function of the wavelength.

Fig. 5 presents curves corresponding to those in Fig. 4

but with an absorption curve for a discriminating material plotted in.

Fig. 6, finally, shows the variation in the relative intensity of the radiation, with a diaphragm of the type in common use heretofore and with a diaphragm including discriminating material according to the invention.

In Fig. 3a, strips of lead or a similar heavy material placed on edge in spaced relation are denoted by 1. Parallel spaced cover plates 3 and 4 are placed across the opposite edges of the strips 1 and, in accordance with the invention as illustrated in this figure, the spaces between the strips 1, which spaces form passageways for the X-rays, are filled with the discriminating material constituted as an alloy 2. It is also possible to apply the discriminating material as a sheet on the surface of at least one of the cover plates 3 and 4. a

An X-ray tube usually emits a heterogeneous radiation, with only the lower limit of its wavelength controlled by theoperating voltageofthe tube. In a study of the X-ray radiation generally used in radiography, it is observed V that the wavelength distribution and the intensity may be illustrated by curves such as shown in Fig. 4. The abscissa in Fig. 4 represents the wavelength of the X-ray radiation and the ordinateits intensity. Curve R shows the in- 'tensityof'the primary radiation as a function of the wavelength. Pointx on the wavelength scale indicatesthe shortest wavelength, determined by the voltage of 'th'e X-ray tubecwhich the tube emits; Investigations and experiments haveshown-that, inregard' to image-producing i properties, suchan'intensity-wavelength curve can hereplacedbya given intensity at a-definite wavelength; i. e.,

-"monochromatic radiation. This may also be expressed so that the intensity-wavelengthcurve has an average point, denoted P in Fig. 4. It should be-obvious that in =suchacornparison variations in hardness or penetrating capacity: must be taken into consideration for the difierje nt wavelengths. only with respect to. image-producing, such a hetero- ."geneousradiationof a particular intensity as equal to 'a monochromatic radiation of a" definite wavelength (effec- The present intention is to describe,

tive'wavelength h and equal intensity. When the pri- 'mary radiation passes through the object, secondary radiation arises, and because of the Compton efiect, the wavelength of..this secondary radiation is increased. a

. 7 A short review of the Compton effect 'must be-included.

' The Compton effect .is obtained'when a photon meets an electron at a low energy level. This collision results in a change in direction and a loss. of the energy for thephoton,

' while the electron receives an impulse concurrently. The loss-of the energy of the photon also means an increase in wavelength; If the change in directionin relation to the directionof the primary. radiation is denoted by the angle 6, the increase in the'wavelength will be a 7 0.0242:(l-cos a A. In the case of a directional change of 90, theincrease in the, wavelengthwill be 0.0242 A. andwith a change of 7 180, it will be 0.0484 A. In a measurement of the Compton effect after. the passage of the X-ray radiation through Q the object, the intensity 'of the radiation appearing with penetration of the object. 1 Point Sindicates the average ipomt of the scatteredradiation curve.. The displacement between the average points of the two curves, P and S, denotesthe change in the wavelength of the radiation due to the Compton efiect. The advantages. of the-new diaphragm are obtained through providing the screening.

grid with a discriminating material A having the property highly absorbing 'the secondary radiation having: the longer-effective wavelength, according to' curve C in Figi'4, whileimmaterially affecting the primary radiation, according to curve R' inFig. 4. By means ofselecting suitable discriminating material with regard, among othenfactors; to'the operating voltage, of the X-ray tube, the absorption wavelength band ofgthe material can be exploited. It 'is primarily the K-absorption wavelength band which is used. The solid-line curve in Fig. '5 shows.

7 V The V V dashed curves'are the same intensity-wavelength curves the absorption of one discriminating material.

for X-ray radiation as shown in Fig. 4. It is clearly sarilyijincreasing theexposure time and/or.

evident'from Fig. 5 how much less the absorption #1 for the-average point'P is than the absorption #1 for the' averagepoint S,fo r. the secondary. radiation. Inyestigatio'n's fand tests have. shown that :one or; more: ottheiele- V 4 V ments of the periodic system with atomic numbers (Z) 7 higher than 13 and without strong inherent radiationare suitable for use as discriminating material. Elements with atomic numbers lower'than 13 have their K-absorption wavelength limit at'over 7 A. Therefore, they he so far from the wavelength range in which the secondary a radiation substantially. aiTects-the contrast in the image a that they are without significance for; this diaphragm. jIn

the selection of'suitable discriminating material, 'it'lis important that the K-absorption wavelength band for the. various elements occur. at ditfe'rent wavelengths v accord- 7 ing to the equation. c. 1

where. u 7 i A =the wavelength .of jtheX-ray radiation k=a constant Z=the atomic number of the discriminating material in 7 material in the periodic system.

7 .Ashasalreadybeen shownin connectionwiththeidiscussion of the curves in Figs..4 and 5 it is-possible; to ob.-

tain especially good effects-5 with the.newfdiaphragm" through selecting a suitable discriminatingjmaterial' in relation to thejparticular'radiation wavelength whichis otherwise adapted tothe radiography of aparticularobject; In the majority of cases, a-diaphragm with discriminating material selected withregard to a wider wavelength range can fulfill its purpose entirelysatisfactorily. However, in the radiography, ofspecial objects andextensive serial radiography, there may be reasons for the selection of the particular discriminatiugmaterial' which afiords.

the most advantageous relation, between image-producing and image-destroying radiation striking the film; In such cases, the discriminating material that should be selected has proven to be an element with the atomic number "wherex is the efiective wavelength of the secondary'radiation. As'r'eg'ards the quantity of di'sci'iminatingiriaterial. expedientlyused, it may be'mentio'ned that a greater proportion of the lighter elements with'low atomic'numhe'rs is requiredthan ofthe'heavier elements with higherjatormc numbers; Experiments have shown that V the proportion ofdiscrirninating material, which because of' the properties of absorption 0t the materialareiinverselyproportional to'the' third power of the. atomic number; should a be at least r 1Q =quant ity of'the; active element or elements ofthe dis- 1 criminating material in the passageways for the X-ra y's through the diaphragm in pe'rcentof the non-discriminat- 7 ing material in said passageways. Z= the atomic number in the. periodic system of the discriminating material. i

, Th e upper limit for the proportion of discriminating material is that which affords the same absorption n the discriminator. plus its carrier as in the screening gr1d Iitselfj i. e., that:whicli eliminatesthe screening eflect of; .the device. In practice, one should operate in the lower i halfof this proportion range order to avoidunneces; the requisite voltage of the X-raytube used. H I r V Fig.6. presents'a further example illustrat ng the ad.

lvantage ofthe newv secondary diaphragm. The curves 1 V show theradiation intensities after penetrationof a dia:

phragrn of the type usual heretofore, on the one, hand,

a and after a' diaphragm containing t'liscriminating materialaccording to the invention, onthe other hand; The abscissa in the, figure'r'e'presents the operatingvoltage;

V ofthejX-ray tube. Theordinate represent the in? tensity Iof the X-rayradiation. 7 Curve P 'represents the primary X-ray radiationafter passage through. a'water phantom, and curveSi shows the secondary radiation which arose in'the object; The -latter is' 7 i tense than theprimary-"radiation. Without any secondary diaphragm, both these radiations WOuIdStriKeWh'epHQmassm graphic film to their full extent and, in the familiar manner, the secondary radiation would obliterate even strong contrast which is essential to the evaluation of the image. Through a secondary diaphragm of the type usual heretofore, introduced into the path of the radiation in front of the film, radiation intensities are obtained after penetration of the diaphragm as shown in curves P and S corresponding respectively to primary and secondary radiation. As mentioned earlier, and as is evident from correlation of the intensities of the two curves, considerably better images are obtained with than without these diaphragms. The two curves P and S in the same figure are intensity curves recorded under the same conditions and with a screening grid of the same construction as used for curves P and S Curve P shows the intensity of the primary radiation and curve S that of the secondary radiation after the total radiation having penetrated the object has passed through a secondary diaphragm containing discriminating material according to the invention. A comparison of the ratio between the intensities of primary and secondary radiation P/S after penetration of the two difierent diaphragms, indicates that the ratio is considerably improved by the new diaphragm. The ratio P/S is essentially improved by the addition of discriminating material to the screening grid system. The great improvement in the reproduction of the image with the new secondary diaphragm appears even more clearly when the density of the photographic film is considered in relation to the radiation intensity.

A large addition of discriminating material produces a better elfect but may also introduce disadvantages such as long exposure times or exposure of the object to excessive irradiation. Thediscriminating material can be applied to the screening grid in several diflerent ways; alone or in the form of a chemical compound, an alloy as shown in Fig. 3a or in combination with other carrier materials. These latter having, of course, lower absorption capacity (greater radioparency) than the discriminating material. A suitable carrier material, which may be organic or inorganic, may be combined with the discriminating material or its compounds, for example, and subsequently applied to the screening grid in various ways. The carrier material may also advantageously be comprised of a fiber material, e. g., textile material or paper, such as in laminated form, soaked in a suitable solution or suspension of the discriminating material or a compound thereof and dried as shown at 2' in Fig. 3b. Moreover, various plastic materials could be used as carriers with the discriminating material mixed therein as shown at 2' in Fig. 30, possibly together with other fillers. Light metals can be alloyed with discriminating material and applied to the screening grid. It may even be expedient that two or more basic elements, suitable as discriminating material, be combined. It should be pointed out that the salts of discriminating materials act in a particular manner. The salts usually give a curve with the K-absorption wavelength band immediately beside the K-absorption wavelength band of the salt-forming substance. Accordingly, this should be taken into consideration in the selection of a discriminating material. In addition, several layers containing difierent discriminating materials and combined with the screening grid in various manners could be used. The essential feature is the fact that the new screen grid system of the scattered radiation diaphragm is equipped with one or more elements of the kind and quantity set forth herein above; meaning that the kind and quantity be so adapted that the scattered radiation undergoes a greater absorption than the primary radiation.

In practice, the most important wavelength range in radiography corresponds to a wavelength h for secondary radiation of less than 1 A. In the following table, the K-absorption edges are given for some of the more common elements which are suitable as material for the radiation range below the limit 1 Table i 2.5 Mn 1.89 Ni 1.48 As 1.04 Sr Mo 0.62 Sb 0.41 '1 e Ta 0.18 Au Pb 0.14 i 0.13 v 2.26 Fe 1.73 Cu 1.37 Se 0.97 Zr 0.69 Ag 0.48 Ba 0.33 W 0.18 Hg 0.15 U 0.11 Cr 2.06 Co 1.60 Zn 1.28 Br 0.91 Sn 0.42

As previously mentioned, it is possible to combine two or more of the elements listed or to use compounds containing several of them, in order to attain as steep an absorption curve as possible within the wavelength range in question.

What is claimed is:

1. Secondary diaphragm for X-ray radiography comprising screening strips of an X-ray absorbing material placed on edge to form a screening grid and define passageways for X-rays extending between said strips, and discriminating material of less absorptive capacity for primary radiation than said screening strips evenly distributed over the entire cross section of said passageways and containing at least one element having atomic number (2) higher than 13 in the periodic system and a K- absorption edge at a wavelength shorter than 7 angstrom units, the proportion of said discriminating material being at least 22.5002- percent by weight of the total material between the screening strips.

2. Secondary diaphragm as claimed in claim 1 in which the discriminating material contains an element, the efiective absorption edge of which lies at a longer wavelength than the effective wavelength of the secondary radiation.

3. Secondary diaphragm as claimed in claim 2 in which the discriminating material contains an element having an absorption curve having a steep part ending at said absorption edge, the effective wavelength of the secondary radiation lying on said steep part.

4. Secondary diaphragm as claimed in claim 1, comprising a carrier material for the discriminating material,

said carrier material having a K-absorption edge at a longer wavelength than 7 angstrom units.

5. Secondary diaphragm as claimed in claim 4 in which the discriminating material is absorbed in a fibrous carrier material.

6. Secondary diaphragm as claimed in claim 4 in which the discriminating material is absorbed in a fibrous carrier material of the group consisting of textile material and paper.

7. Secondary diaphragm as claimed in claim 4 in which the discriminating material is included as filler in a carrier material consisting of a plastic.

8. Secondary diaphragm as claimed in claim 4 in which the discriminating material is alloyed with at least one gh lz'ha n lbw atam c number than that of e discriminating material.

ARefgrences Cited in the 'fil e of this patent E r V UNITED STATES PATENIS 9. Secondary dlaphragmas glalmed 111 6131111 1 1n whlch :221 3799 Schdnander L Jan. 10, 1939 flge lscnmmatmg matenal contams an element the Etmmc I 22407:938 zschonanderuukn;fiu pt. 75 "519-46

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2143799 *Nov 24, 1937Jan 10, 1939Georg Schonander NilsChi-ray screening diaphragm
US2407938 *Nov 24, 1943Sep 17, 1946Georg Schonander NilsChi-ray screening apparatus
US2522522 *May 3, 1941Sep 19, 1950Schlumberger Well Surv CorpShielding method and apparatus for radioactive borehole logging
DE496781C *Jun 23, 1927Apr 25, 1930Hans Lewin DrVorrichtung zur Erzeugung scharfer Roentgenbilder mittels einer Sekundaerblende
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3936646 *Nov 29, 1973Feb 3, 1976Jonker Roelof RCollimator kit
US4361899 *Apr 13, 1981Nov 30, 1982Kurt AmplatzScanning x-ray system
US4403150 *Feb 18, 1981Sep 6, 1983Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki KaishaSemiconductor radiation sensor arrangement for an automatic X-ray exposure control apparatus
US5099859 *Dec 6, 1988Mar 31, 1992Bell Gene DMethod and apparatus for comparative analysis of videofluoroscopic joint motion
US5606589 *May 9, 1995Feb 25, 1997Thermo Trex CorporationAir cross grids for mammography and methods for their manufacture and use
US5729585 *Dec 6, 1996Mar 17, 1998Thermotrex CorporationAir cross grids for mammography and methods for their manufacture and use
US5814235 *Dec 3, 1996Sep 29, 1998Thermo Trex CorporationAir cross grids for mammography and methods for their manufacture and use
US6075840 *Feb 10, 1998Jun 13, 2000Trex Medical CorporationAir cross grids for X-ray imaging
US6185278Jun 24, 1999Feb 6, 2001Thermo Electron Corp.Focused radiation collimator
EP0087844A2 *Feb 23, 1983Sep 7, 1983Philips Electronics N.V.Grid structure for x-ray apparatus
EP0681736A1 *Jan 26, 1994Nov 15, 1995SOKOLOV, OlegCellular x-ray grid
WO1990006084A1 *Nov 27, 1989Jun 14, 1990Gene D BellMethod and apparatus for comparative analysis of videofluoroscopic joint motion
U.S. Classification378/154, 976/DIG.429
International ClassificationG21K1/02
Cooperative ClassificationG21K1/025
European ClassificationG21K1/02B