Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2832545 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateApr 29, 1958
Filing dateMar 3, 1955
Priority dateMar 3, 1955
Publication numberUS 2832545 A, US 2832545A, US-A-2832545, US2832545 A, US2832545A
InventorsBenjamin Segraves William
Original AssigneeExxon Research Engineering Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Supersonic jet grinding means and method
US 2832545 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

A ril 29, 1958 w. B. SEGRAVES 2,832,545

SUPERSONIC JET GRINDING MEANS AND METHOD Filed March 5, 1955 w souns II? w SUPERSWIIC sussomc (:15 ms sfim srmn 2! mrr runs 0 I00 200 500 400 57 FIG. 2 WILLIAM B. SEGRAVES INVENTOR BY/M MMMWM ATTORNEYS United States Patent Ofifice 2,832,545 Patented Apr. 29, 1958 2,832,545 SUPERSONIC JET GRINDING MEANS AND to Esso Research and Engineering Company, a corporation of Delaware Application March 3, 1955, Serial No. 491,915 7 Claims. (Cl. 241-1) The present invention relates to an improved supersonic jet grinding means and method such as is suitable for grinding finely divided particulate solids into finer particles by impact and attrition. More particularly, the invention relates to means for employing supersonic jets to grind small petroleum coke particles such as are produced and utilized in the fluid coking process for converting heavy oil to coke and other products.

In recent years highly successful processes have been developed for utilizing fluidized masses of finely divided solid materials for supplying thermal and/or catalytic requirements in various conversion processes. For example, finely divided solid particles, catalytic in nature, have been used for cracking petroleum products, for reforming naphthas and for various other purposes. A more recent development is the utilization of finely divided and relatively inert particles for supplying heat to produce thermal conversion of oils and the like. The so-called fluid coking process, for example, employs large masses of petroleum coke particles which may vary in size from about 20 to 400 microns or more in particle diameter. These are preheated and brought into the reaction zone where they are fluidized and contacted with the feed to be converted. The thermal energy contained in the preheated particles is sufiicient to accomplish the desired conversion, normally resulting in production of more coke which is deposited upon the original particles causing them to grow in average particle size.

Obviously in the coking process just described, the growing particles would soon become too large for eflicient use in the sysetm. This is true even though the particles may be reheated by partial combustion which would tend to reduce their average size. Most coking processes produce more coke than is needed for conversion requirements by combustion, and consequently, some of the coke must be withdrawn from the system as a by-product.

The coke retained in the sysetm must also be reduced in particle size to an appropriate level for operating efiiciency. Small or seed particles are desirable in large numbers to serve as nuclei for the deposition of coke formed by the pyrolytic conversion of the feed. As these particles grow, they must be repeatedly broken up into smaller particles to keep the system operating effectively and efiiciently. This gives rise to the requirement for grinding or attrition of the coke particles. The present invention has as a major object the efficient grinding or attrition of such particles to supply seed requirements to the system. The invention, however, is not limited in its application to particles of coke. It is equally applicable to other materials which need size reduction and may be applied to catalytic or non-catalytic materials of any type so long as they are hard, brittle and subject to size reduction by impact, attrition and particle breakage;

The present invention is based upon the discovery that by suitable jet nozzle design, preferably in combination with a draft tube arrangement, a gasiform fluid may be injected into a mobile mass of solid particles so as to draw some of the particles into the draft tube and break them up. The particulate solids are preferably a suspended or fluidized mass of solids. The apparatus is designed to draw the solid particles directly into the path of the jet and thereby cause impact or collision and shock to the particles sufficient to break them up into smaller sizes. Specifically it has been found that the design of the nozzle should be such that the sum of its outlet velocity head, plus the static pressure head of the emerging stream per se is only moderately higher than the ambient pressure within the zoneinto which the stream is being injected. This means that the static pressure head of the stream per se must be substantially lower than the ambient pressure head within the zone where grinding and attrition are to take place. By such an arrangement solids surrounding the nozzle and in the general vicinity thereof are drawn, because of reduced pressure, into the emerging gas stream. This gas stream must be above supersonic velocity as it first contacts the particles. Conditions must be such that the jet velocity is quickly reduced to subsonic, with the consequential production of severe shock waves. These shock waves, which take place within the restricted draft tube or draft zone, produce high turbulence and pronounced impact and collision between the particles. They also cause collision between the particles and surrounding structural elements where such are present. In this way they produce substantial breakage and grinding of the solid particles which are drawn into the path of the fluid jet.

The invention will be more clearly understood and its objectives more readily apparent by reference to a detailed desecription of a presently preferred embodiment.

Referring to the attached drawings, Fig. 1 shows, on a relatively large scale, a high velocity nozzle for a gasiform fluid such as steam. It shows also, an axially aligned draft tube having a relatively enlarged inlet end, an intermediate reduced section and a still larger outlet end of a continuous passageway. The inlet end of the draft tube and, in fact, its smallest cross-section is larger in diameter than the outlet end of the nozzle.

Fig. 2 shows certain graphical relations between upstream pressure and the sum of outlet static head plus velocity in a nozzle of suitable design.

Pig. 3 shows in relatively small scale a vessel containing the nozzle and draft tube arrangement of Fig. 1.

Referring in more detail to the drawings, Fig. 1 shows a nozzle 1 forming the terminal portion of a tube 3 having a constriction or vena contracta 5 and a flared tip portion 7 at its outlet end. The design of this nozzle is preferably such that the following conditions exist:

Nozzle outlet static head-l-velocity head=(1+x) bed pressure, or


P =static pressure at outlet of nozzle in p. s. i. a.

V=gas velocity in ft./sec. at the outlet of the nozzle.

=gas density in lb./ft. at the outlet of the: nozzle.

g gravitational force constant.

x=margin of safety for excess head desired over that necessary to feed gas into the bed (as a fraction of the bed pressure).

P zstatic pressure of the bed in p. s. i. a.

feet per second and preferably 1200-3000 or more feet per second, is rapidly reduced as the stream or other gasiform fluid expands. Consequently, as it passes through the sound barrier, shock waves are produced giving extremely high turbulence and heavy impact and collision between the particles entrained in the stream. It is here that attrition or grinding takes place.

While the nozzle 1 may be used alone, under some conditions, it is preferably used in combination with a draft tube indicated at 15. This tube is suitably mounted, within the zone where grinding is to. take place, by any suitable means such as supporting brackets 17 shown in Figure 3. It is also mounted so that the passageway through the draft tube is in direct axial alignment with the axis of nozzle 1. The particular design of the draft tube per so may be varied somewhat. The inlet end of the passageway, indicated at 19, is shown as substantially larger in cross-sectional area than the outlet 7 of the nozzle. In the embodiment shown in Fig. 1, the passageway gradually reduces in cross-section, moving to the right in Fig. l to pass through a minimum section 21 which may be sort of vena contracta. Thereafter the passageway is enlarged gradually so that the outlet 23 is larger than the mid-section and it may be larger than inlet end 19. The shape shown has proved to be satisfactory but the passageway may be cylindrical, if desired, with substantially equivalent results, so long as the draft causes the desired flow of particles from the general mass of the bed into the path of the supersonic velocity jet.

With the arrangement just described, the supersonic velocity gas stream emerging from the nozzle flared end 7 into inlet 19 of the draft tube is at very low static pressure. This pressure is preferably sub-atmospheric and may be as low as 1 or 2 lbs. per square inch absolute. A desirable range ordinarily is from 3 to or 12 lbs. absolute pressure when the ambient pressure is atmospheric. The pressure within the system Cat .4. of the bed usually exists above the interface 35 of a fluid bed of solid particles. It will also be understood that the system is applicable to a suspension or other mass of particles which are not necessarily in the form of a bed having a definite interface. In some cases, the system can be used with a dense bed that is not fluidized or at least not entirely fluidized. In either case the density and mobility of the mass must be such that a substantial number of particles may be drawn into the path of the supersonic fluid stream for grinding.

The nozzle 1 and the draft tube 15 are therefore inserted at any appropriate point in the system. A plurality of such units obviously may be used where neede and in a large vessel 31 several are desirable.

Where the main mass in the vessel is a fluid bed or suspension, an upflowing stream of gasiform fluid such as steam, hydrocarbon vapors, inert gases, etc., is supplied through an inlet 37 to keep the solid particles fluidized or suspended within the system. The gasiform fluid supplied to the jet nozzle 1 may be of any suitable type. For use with a coker, where coke grinding is needed, the preferred fluid usually is steam which may be saturated or superheated as desired. The pressure of the iet tluid, in any case, should be such that the conditions stated above are maintained. Thus, the sum of static pressure head plus velocity head of the nozzle outlet stream should be only about as high or moderately higher than the pressure within vessel 31. A factor of safety, more properly a performance factor, may be designated by the term x, as shown above, and the static head plus velocity head of the incoming gas stream should equal the sum of (1+x) times the pressure within the vessel.

The following table shows the various operating characteristics which are suitable. It also defines satisfactory limits for operation of the invention, where x is as defined above, P is absolute pressure within the bed.

1 Assumed fixed values. 1 Calculated values.

tion indicated abstractly by lines and 27 of Fig. 1, without attempting to define their limits or characteristics, which does not appear to be practicable at the present time. Here, in this general area, the gas stream drops from supersonic to subsonic velocity and the shock creates severe impact between particles, and against the draft tube walls. it causes the desired particle grinding mentioned above. The function of the draft tube, obviously, is to control and limit the amount of solids subjectcd to shock waves for more eflicient grinding or attrition than is possible without it.

Referring to Fig. 3, there is shown a container or vessel 31 within which a mass 33 of mobile solid particles is maintained. This mass is indicated as a so-called fluid bed with an interface 35 defining its approximate upper level. It will be understood, of course, that a disperse phase of small particles which are carried out These figures show nozzle upstream pressure, nozzle outlet pressures and gas densities based on the formulas given above. For the condtions of Table I with a vessel operating at atmospheric pressure, the minimum upstream pressure required is about p. s. i. a. With a system, c. g. a fluid bed, operating at 30 p. s. i. a. pressure and providing a factor x of 10%, the term Pfififls p. s. i. 8.. Under these conditions the required upstream pressure for the optimum nozzle design is about p. s. i. a.

At some modern petroleum refineries, it is conventional to provide steam at about 465 p. s. i. a. If steam at this pressure were used in the nozzle supplied to a coking bed operating at 30 p. s. i. a., there would be an excess head at the nozzle outlet of about 50 p. s. i. This would be highly inefficient. Obviously, the use of steam at 465 p. s. i. a. instead of 150 p. s. i. a. is wasteful when it is not needed. Elaborate apparatus must be employed for the higher pressure. Obviously, more horsepower hours of energy are required to grind the solids when the higher pressure is used.

To substantiate the foregoing, a series of tests were conducted, on fluid coke of particle size within the general '5 limits mentioned above, i. e. about 20 to 400 microns average particle diameter, using air for the jets. Tests were conducted with apparatus designed for nozzle inlet pressures respectively of 90 and 450 p. s. i. g. Low pressure tests were made at 72 and 83 p. s. i. g. respectively and high pressure tests at 450 and 400 p. s. i. g. The tests indicated that slightly larger quantities of very fine coke were produced by the high pressure jets but operating efliciency in terms of pounds of ground coke per horsepower hour were much higher at low pressures. The conclusion is clear that low pressure jets are superior to high pressure jets for overall efficiency. While the ditferences are not as great when steam is employed as the grinding medium, because steam pressures can be generated by heat, they are very substantial where other This second example gives an idea of orders of maggases such as air are used and where they must be comnitude and the relative magnitude based on the specific pressed mechanically for use. The differences in investcase of Example I above.

ment and operating costs, between air at 90 to 150 lbs. The invention contemplates both the apparatus and vs. air at 450 lbs. or so, are very great. In either case, the method of process aspects and obviously variations however, the low pressure operation requires less exmay be made therein within the scope of the art without pensive equipment and is generally much more economdeparting from the spirit thereof.

ical. The data obtained are summarized in the follow- What is claimed is:

ing table: 1. Means for grinding hard granular material to finer TABLE II Example II.-C0mparison of a low pressure jet design with conventional design Supersonic jet attriter data [Tests conducted in 12" glass jiggler using air for jets and fluid coke] Thru 100 Thru 200 Thru 100 Thru 200 T st Design Operating Operating Flow Discharge Discharge Bed Pres- Mesh Pro- Mesh Pro- Mesh Pro- Mesh Pro- Nozzle Type Number Pressure Pressure tempgra- Rate 1 Pressure 1 velocity 1 sure duced duced duced dnced (p. 5.1. g.) (p.s.i. g.) ture, F. (s.c.i.m.) (p. s. i. g.) (it/sec.) (p. s. i. g.) (1b./s.c.i.) (lb./s.c.f.) (Ila/l; pp (ilk/13 m- Low Pressure 1 c0 72 ca. so 14. 7 6. s 1, 620 ca. 0. oae 0. 025 19.7 4 1s. 7 1 3 90 83 ca. 80 15. 7 5. 9 1, 620 ca. 2 0. 029 0. 0105 14. 6 5. 3 5 450 ca. 80 21. 3 54. 4 1, 505 ca. 2 0.023 0.022 5. 2 4. 9 9 400 ca. 80 19 44. 1 1, 530 ea. 2 0. 045 0. 022 9. 6 4. 7

ith draft tube.

u to the o crating pressures shown above.

p 4 Recygle grinding probably caused these values to be high.

As noted above, the jet nozzle alone can be used with some efliciency but it is preferable to use it in combination with the draft tube. When the draft tube is used, it is preferably of abrasion resistant material since considerable impact with its walls occurs at the point where the shock waves are formed and where the resulting high turbulence causes severe impact, sufficient to break the solid particles.

Specific designs for nozzles and other elements will vary for the particular unit and scale of operation. An example of one attriter is given below:

particle size, comprising in combination a filared nozzle, designed for high terminal velocity and having a directional axis, means for supplying a gasiform fluid to said nozzle at such rate and pressure as to cause the fluid to emerge from the flared end of the nozzle as a supersonic velocity jet, and a draft tube of larger internal diameter than the outlet of the nozzle located within a mass of said granules and in axial alignment with said nozzle and in front of its outlet to receive said jet, said draft tube being so designed as to draw a limited supply of said granules into the path of the gasiform fluid stream emerging from the nozzle, whereby the jet passes from supersonic velocity through the sonic barrier within said draft tube thereby creating shock waves within said draft tube and whereby particles within said draft tube are broken up by reason of the shock and consequent impacts imparted thereto.

2. A method of grinding hard, brittle, granular material into finer particle size, which comprises injecting a supersonic velocity jet of gasiform fluid .into a relatively quiescent zone wherein a mass of material to be ground is in fluidized suspension, passing the jet immediately into a confined zone of substantially larger cross-section than the nozzle outlet whereby a substantial drop in pressure takes place, thereby causing said material to be drawn into the path of said stream and into said confined zone, and suddenly reducing the velocity of said stream through the sonic barrier within 7 said confined z'oneto cause shock and collision to particles of said material and thereby break said material into smaller particles.-

3. A method of grinding fluidizable solid particles of matter into smaller particles, which comprises establishing a fluidized mass of said particles in a container by passng a gasiform fluid upwardly therethrough at apparent velocity of about 0.1 to 10 feet per second, injecting a supersonic velocity stream of gasiform fluid through a part of said fluidized mass and into a quiescent draft zone of cross-section larger than the injeeted stream and at substantially lower pressure, the relation of the stream to the draft zone being such that the velocity of said stream rapidly diminishes and passes through the sound barrier within said zone, whereby solids are drawn from said mass into said zone and are broken up by mutual collision and by the high turbulence and shock waves produced as the stream goes from supersonic to subsonic velocity within said zone.

4. Process according to claim 3 wherein the solid particles are petroleum coke particles produced by pyrolysis of heavy oil.

5. Process according to claim 3 wherein the gasiform fluidis steam.

6. In apparatus for grinding particulate solids, the combination of a container for a mass of said solids, means for imparting mobility to at least some of the particles of said mass within said container, a draft tube mounted within said container and normally surrounded by said mass and by some of said mobile particles, said draft tube having a continuous passageway therethrough with a relatively large inlet end, and a high velocity fluid nozzle projecting from a wall of said container substantially to and directly toward the said inlet end, the outlet of said nozzle being substantially smaller in cross-section than said inlet and the nozzle design being such that a supersonic velocity stream of gasiform fluid emerges therefrom into said inlet end at pressure substantially below the ambient pressure within the said mass, whereby a stream of particles is drawn into the draft tube, the design of said draft tube beingsuch that the velocity of the gasiform stream drops from supersonic to subsonic therein, with consequent passage through the sound barrier and resulting high turbulence and shock to cause attrition and grinding of the particles within said draft tube.

7. Apparatus according to claim 6 wherein the nozzle is so designed that the sum of the stream outlet velocity head and the static pressure head is only slightly higher than the ambient pressure Within the vessel and the static pressure within the stream per se is very substantially less than said ambient pressure.

References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,105,154 Maxon Ian. 11, 1938 2,196,169 Twombly Apr. 2, 1940 2,515,542 Yellott July 18, 1950 2,532,554 Ioeck Dec. 5, 1950 2,560,807 Lobo July 17, 1951

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2105154 *Jun 7, 1937Jan 11, 1938Maxon Norman GSpray nozzle
US2196169 *Mar 31, 1938Apr 2, 1940Frost Insecticide CompanyNozzle
US2515542 *Apr 20, 1948Jul 18, 1950Inst Gas TechnologyMethod for disintegration of solids
US2532554 *Jan 29, 1946Dec 5, 1950Thomas D JoeckMethod for atomizing by supersonic sound vibrations
US2560807 *Sep 18, 1947Jul 17, 1951 Method of explosive pulverization
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2997245 *Jan 13, 1959Aug 22, 1961Kohlswa Jernverks AbMethod and device for pulverizing and/or decomposing solid materials
US3062458 *Sep 9, 1957Nov 6, 1962Dearing Arthur GOre upgrader
US3178121 *Apr 24, 1962Apr 13, 1965Du PontProcess for comminuting grit in pigments and supersonic fluid energy mill therefor
US3275546 *Dec 28, 1962Sep 27, 1966Consolidation Coal CoMethod of attriting solids in a hydrocracking process
US3851426 *Mar 27, 1972Dec 3, 1974Lemelson JMethod for finishing articles
US3876156 *May 25, 1972Apr 8, 1975Bayer AgMethod of and apparatus for the jet-pulverisation of fine grained and powdered solids
US4326944 *Apr 14, 1980Apr 27, 1982Standard Oil Company (Indiana)Rapid hydropyrolysis of carbonaceous solids
US4418871 *Jul 15, 1981Dec 6, 1983P.V. Machining, Inc.Method and apparatus for reducing and classifying mineral crystalline and brittle noncrystalline material
US4906387 *Jan 28, 1988Mar 6, 1990The Water Group, Inc.Method for removing oxidizable contaminants in cooling water used in conjunction with a cooling tower
US6722594Feb 26, 2001Apr 20, 2004William GrahamPulveriser and method of pulverising
US6978953Jan 5, 2004Dec 27, 2005Power Technologies Investment LimitedPulveriser and method of pulverising
US7025874 *Oct 4, 2002Apr 11, 2006Ace Oil Sands, L.P.Nozzle/mixer assembly
US7059550 *Nov 12, 2003Jun 13, 2006Power Technologies Investment Ltd.System and method for pulverizing and extracting moisture
US7487689Jan 7, 2004Feb 10, 2009Tracetrack Technology Ltd.Contaminant scanning system
US20040065590 *Oct 4, 2002Apr 8, 2004Chan Edward W.Nozzle/mixer assembly
US20040200910 *Nov 12, 2003Oct 14, 2004William GrahamSystem and method for pulverizing and extracting moisture
CN101436402BDec 4, 2008Mar 30, 2011上海大学Crisscross gas resonance frequency generator
DE1164806B *Jul 16, 1960Mar 5, 1964Alpine Ag Maschinenfabrik U EiVerfahren zur Strahlmahlung
DE1243500B *Oct 31, 1962Jun 29, 1967Gen Am TransportVerfahren und Vorrichtung zur Behandlung, insbesondere zum Zerkleinern von feuchtem, koernigem, agglomeriertem Gut
DE3338138A1 *Oct 20, 1983May 9, 1985Alpine AgFliessbett-gegenstrahlmuehle
WO2000013799A1 *Aug 30, 1999Mar 16, 2000William GrahamPulveriser and method of pulverising
WO2004063697A2 *Jan 7, 2004Jul 29, 2004Ornath FredyContaminant scanning system
U.S. Classification241/1, 241/39, 208/127
International ClassificationB02C19/06
Cooperative ClassificationB02C19/06
European ClassificationB02C19/06