Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2870094 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJan 20, 1959
Filing dateSep 28, 1955
Priority dateSep 28, 1955
Publication numberUS 2870094 A, US 2870094A, US-A-2870094, US2870094 A, US2870094A
InventorsCathcart John A
Original AssigneeEastman Kodak Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Photographic film cleaning solutions
US 2870094 A
Abstract  available in
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

2,870,094 PHOTGGRAPHIC FILM ILEANING SGLUTIONS John A. Qathcart, Rochester, N. Y., assignor to Eastman Kodak fompany, Rochester, N. Y., a corporation of New Jersey No Drawing. Application September 28, 1955 Serial No. 537,272

1 Claim. (Cl. 252-171) base when properly used in accepted cleaning procedures.

As is well known, however, methyl chloroform often attacks aluminum metal. This notorious reaction is not merely a corrosion effect but actually is evidenced by evolution of a gas (hydrogen chloride) and production of a purple to black color and a precipitate. If exposure of the aluminum to the solvent is continued after the reaction is underway, the reaction will become quite vigorous. However, the reaction is erratic. It occurs sometimes when not expected and at other times it fails when it is expected to occur. In any event, it is sufficiently troublesome to render uninhibited methyl chloroform generally unsuitable for film cleaning use since in such use contact of the film cleaning solvent with aluminum metal often may occur. Reaction of methyl chloroform with metal is not limited entirely to aluminum but has been observed with some alloys of Zinc. However, inhibition of the normal activity of methyl chloroform toward aluminum appears in every instance to result also in inhibition of the activity with respect to the zinc alloys. 1

For use as a solvent in fields other than photographic film cleaning, it has been found possible to stabilize methyl chloroform sufficiently to prevent reaction with aluminum. However, it has also been found that many of the stabilizers are not tolerated by photographic film and all of them, as far as I am aware, may produce detrimental effects if extreme care is not used. Among the detrimental effects which these stabilizers or inhibitors exhibit on photographic film, the two most significant perhaps are solvent activity for the film and tendency to deposit a noticeable residue or smear which remains on the film for an unusually long time.

It is an object of the present invention to provide new inhibitors for methyl chloroform and new film cleaning compositions containing the same, which inhibitors will eliminate reactions between the methyl chloroform and aluminum and at the same time provide compositions having utility for film cleaning without'the bad effects on film which result from the use of the known and otherwise satisfactory inhibitors.

I have discovered that compounds selected from the group consisting of dihydropyran, Z-methyl furan and 1,3,3-trimethoxypropene, when added in a small amount to methyl chloroform, inhibit reaction of the methyl chloroform with aluminum and provide a, solvent having no adverse efects on photographic film when used in customary film cleaning methods. In accordance with antiwar .Ealtented Jan. 26, 1959 2. my invention a stabilizing amount (generally in the range of about 1 to 5%, preferably 3 *-1%, by weight of the methyl chloroform) of the inhibitor is added to a solution of methyl chloroform, and the solution is used for film cleaning after thorough mixing, preferably after standing for at least about 24 hours.

The method of preparing the inhibited solutions involves nothing more than the'mere mixing together of the two constituents and may therefore be accomplished by any means known to the art as long as sufficient agitation and/or time is utilized to provide a homogeneous mixture, or rather solution. I

It is felt that as a practical matter the less inhibitor added to the methyl chloroform the better, as long as effective inhibition is obtained. While the amount of the inhibitor to be employed in accordance with the present invention is not deemed to be critical, it is a general rule that the concentration of the inhibitor is of some significance in its effectiveness. Thus, from the tables which appear below it will be noted that a compound which is a good inhibitor at the three percent or five percent level may be ineffective at the one percent level. Three percent appears to be "a good average value for the inhibitors of the invention. At the same time there is no reason to believe that these inhibitors will not give 0perative solutions when used in concentrations of more than five percent by weight, although in the tables below' no value greater than five percent is shown (and in practice none should be necessary). The invention therefore contemplates the use of any concentration of the disclosed compounds which is operative in the respect that it is sufficient to inhibit reaction of the methyl chloroform with aluminum. Thus an effective amount will include inhibitor concentrations as low as operative and as high as and higher than five percent as long as the resulting composition is useful and operative as a photographic film cleaning solution.

The inhibited solutions may be used in any of the well-known and accepted film cleaning procedures cus-v tomarily used with prior solvents such as those comprisl,l,Z-trichloro-1,2,2-trifiuoromg carbon tetrachloride, or ethane and/ or n-heptane. Preferably film is cleaned by soft,

gently but firmly wiping its surface with a pad of a lint-free fabric such as velvet, the pad. having been moistened with the inhibited solution. Mechanical devices such as are normally employed in the cleaning of long continuous lengths of motion picture film may be used to advantage. These devices normally comprise a pair of opposed pads providing a path for-the film therebetween, the pads being spring-pressed toward each other to engage the film with the proper pressure on both of its faces, the pads being continuously fed from a reservoir with a regulated amount of cleaning solvent.

The invention is illustrated in the following examples.

EXAMPLE 1.INHIBIT.ING ABILITY Samples of commercial grade methyl chloroform were prepared for testing with thenew inhibitors. Each of the inhibitors dihydropyran, Z-methylfuran, and 1,3,3-trimethoxypropene was added to different samples of the methyl chloroform in varying amounts representing one or more of the concentrations one, three, and five percent by weight of the methyl chloroform. Pieces of 16-gauge type 28 aluminum metal were immersed in the samples of the freshly prepared solutions and all were allowed to stand in a stoppered test tube until a reaction was observed or until a definite time had passed without occurrence of a reaction. These tests were repeated using redistilled methyl chloroform. The data in Table I represent either the shortest time in which a reaction was first observedor the longest time that an inhibitor was under observation with still no reaction having taken place.

4 EXAMPLE 3.EFFECT OF INHIBITED SOLUTIONS Table I ON CELLULOSE ESTER PHOTOGRAPHIC FILM Inhibitor Concentration by Weight BASE 5 Samples of methyl chloroform containing suitable con- Gflmpfund Added 52 535 g gg centrations of each of the three inhibitors of the invention were prepared. These samples were evaluated as to the effect thereof on various types of cellulose ester 1 3 5 1 3 5 film and cellulose ester plastic film cores. Results are 10 shown in the following table. dihydronyran 3M 11 5M 2-methylfnran 3M 3.5M 3.5M 3. 5M 1,3,a-trimethoxypropene. 3M 4. 5M 4. 5M

h=reacted within one hour after mixing.

=no reaction for one month. at which time test was ended. nM=no reaction within 7:. months, when testing was ended. 15

Table IV Appearance Ratings, Attack Rating Percent Residue frcrn Percent Compound Added by Added 1) Weight Weight Wiping Droplet AP AB A3 FAB 2-methylfuran .I 3 3 No Curl" No 8&8 dihydropyran 5 3 No No SS&S 1,3,3-tri-methoxypropene 5 3 No N0. SS&S

AP=cellulose ncetate-propionate film base. AB =cellulose acetate-butyrate film base. A3=high acetyl, i. e. cellulose tri-acetate film base.

PAB =cellulose S&S=swelling and softening.

acetate-butyrate plastic film core.

SS&S =slieht swelling and softening.

-=not tested.

Portions of the inhibitors dihydropyran, Z-methylfuran, and 1,3,3-trimethoxypropene were each added to a diiferent sample of uninhibited practical grade methyl chloroform in an amount of three percent by weight of the latter, thoroughly mixed therewith, and the resulting solutions allowed to stand for one day. Each of the solutions was then divided into twelve parts and into each part was placed a inch by 2 inch piece of roughened 16-gauge aluminum (Type The thirtysix samples were stoppered and allowed to stand while they were observed periodically for evidence of reaction over a thirty-day period. The results of these tests are shown in Table II. Another series of tests was made on a new batch of samples which were observed for a seven day period with results as shown in Table III.

EXAMPLE 4.ABILITY OF THE INHIBITORS TO MAINTAIN THEIR INHIBITING EFFECT AFTER SHELF-AGING FOR A PERIOD OF MONTHS Three solutions of methyl chloroform containing three percent by weight respectively of dihydropyran, 2- methylfuran and 1,3,3-trimethoxypropene were prepared and placed in stoppered glass vessels which were held in storage for six months. A few days after termination of the six month period these solutions were removed from storage and into each was placed a strip of aluminum sheeting. The samples then were kept under observation with the aluminum partially immersed for six days, at the end of which time all samples still were free of any evidence of reaction between the methyl chloroform and the aluminum.

EXAMPLE S.USE OF INHIBITED SOLUTION FOR CLEANING FILM A velvet pad was dampened with a solution of methyl chloroform containing 3% dihydropyran as prepared in Example 1, and a length of cine film was passed in contact with the damp pad. The film leaving the pad was wound onto an aluminum reel and placed in storage overnight. When the film was subsequently unwound no tendency of the convolutions to adhere to each other was noticed. No deposits or smears could be detected on the film by visual inspection. There was no noticeable damage to the surfaces of the reel or of aluminum vessels or other aluminum components of the equipment used in the cleaning operation. No change in the photographic quality of the film was observed but it was exceptionally clean, substantially all dust, grease, and finger smears having been removed.

I claim:

A method of cleaning photographic film comprising wiping the surface of the film with a cleaning member moistened with methylchloroform containing from 1% to 5% by weight of dihydropyran, whereby grease and dirt are removed from the film without damage to the References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS Snelling May 19, 1914 6 Parkhurst Feb. 20, 1934 Aitchison et a1. Mar. 20, 1945 Petering et a1. Mar. 20, 1945 Petering et a1 Mar. 20, 1945 Gardenier Sept. 3, 1946 Dietrich et a1 Sept. 10, 1946

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1097145 *Mar 29, 1913May 19, 1914Frank L DyerFire-extinguishing compound.
US1948045 *May 31, 1932Feb 20, 1934Standard Oil CoDry cleaning fluid
US2371645 *Sep 16, 1943Mar 20, 1945Westvaco Chlorine Products CorDegreasing process
US2371646 *Dec 4, 1943Mar 20, 1945Westvaco Chlorine Products CorDegreasing process
US2371647 *Dec 28, 1943Mar 20, 1945Westvaco Chlorine Products CorDegreasing process
US2407149 *Sep 8, 1944Sep 3, 1946Edison Inc Thomas AStabilized 2-chlor-butene-2
US2407405 *Feb 15, 1943Sep 10, 1946Du PontStabilization of tetrafluoroethylene
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2998461 *Apr 15, 1959Aug 29, 1961Hooker Chemical CorpStabilization of trichloroethylene
US3074890 *Oct 27, 1958Jan 22, 1963Ethyl CorpStable solvent composition
US3128315 *Mar 13, 1961Apr 7, 1964Pittsburgh Plate Glass CoMethylchloroform stabilized with dialkylethers of alkylene glycols
US3238137 *Mar 29, 1961Mar 1, 1966Ethyl CorpStable solvent compositions
US3291745 *Apr 29, 1963Dec 13, 1966Du PontStabilization of trichlorethylene
US3326989 *Aug 18, 1964Jun 20, 1967Pittsburgh Plate Glass CoStabilized methyl chloroform compositions with improved evaporation characteristics
US3360575 *May 19, 1966Dec 26, 1967Dow Chemical CoStabilized solvent system
US3405039 *Aug 9, 1965Oct 8, 1968Dow Chemical CoMagnesium structures for storing and purifying aralkyl halides
US4351973 *Oct 6, 1980Sep 28, 1982The Dow Chemical CompanyStabilized methylchloroform
US4795837 *Mar 6, 1984Jan 3, 1989Solvay & Cie (Societe Anonyme)In water containing an epoxide compound, a nitro compound, and a furan compound
US5665173 *Feb 29, 1996Sep 9, 1997Albemarle CorporationImmersing in solvent containing propyl bromide and alkane
US5669985 *Feb 29, 1996Sep 23, 1997Albemarle CorporationMovie film cleaning process
US5792277 *Jul 23, 1997Aug 11, 1998Albemarle CorporationN-propyl bromide based cleaning solvent and ionic residue removal process
WO1997032238A1 *Feb 26, 1997Sep 4, 1997Albemarle CorpMovie film cleaning solvent
WO1997032239A1 *Feb 26, 1997Sep 4, 1997Albemarle CorpMovie film cleaning solvent
WO1997032240A1 *Feb 26, 1997Sep 4, 1997Albemarle CorpMovie film cleaning solvent
Classifications
U.S. Classification134/40, 510/506, 510/169, 570/114, 510/412
International ClassificationG03C11/00, G03C11/06
Cooperative ClassificationG03C11/06
European ClassificationG03C11/06