Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2901043 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateAug 25, 1959
Filing dateJul 29, 1955
Priority dateJul 29, 1955
Publication numberUS 2901043 A, US 2901043A, US-A-2901043, US2901043 A, US2901043A
InventorsCampion Frank E, Glass Eugene D, Morse Richard A
Original AssigneePan American Petroleum Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Heavy oil recovery
US 2901043 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Aug. 25, 1959 F. E. cAMPloN ETAL 2,901,043

HEAVY OIL RECOVERY Filed July 29, 1955 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 F 'G' 2 INVENTORS FRANK E. CAMPON EUGENE D. GLASS RICHARD A. MORSE BYW W AT Tok/v Y Aug. 25, 1959 Filed July 29, 1955 F. E. CAMPION ETAL 2,901,043




IN VEN TORS FRANK E. CAMPION EUGENE D, GLASS RICHARD A. MORSE ATTOR EY United States Patent HEAVY OIL RECOVERY Frank E. Campion and Eugene D. Glass, Tulsa, Okla;, and Richard A. Morse, Pittsburgh, Pa., assignors to Pan American Petroleum Corporation, a corporation of Delaware Application July 29,` 1955', Serial No. 525,284

4 Claims. (Cl. 166-11) This invention relates to the recovery of oil or hydrocarbons from the underground strata in which they occur and is directed'particularly to the recovery of heavy oils and similar carbonaceous substances byapplying heat to them. More specically, the invention is directed to a process or method of heavy oil recovery by heating wherein the heat is generated byv combustion or oxidation within the deposit or reservoir stratum itself.

There are many'known fields where the percentage of oil recovery is quite low. This may be due-to one or a combination of several causes. In some fields, the poor recovery of oil is'due mostly to unfavorable conditions of porosity and/or permeability of the reservoir medium. In other fields it is known that these latter conditions are favorable, and the poor recovery of oil is due to the characteristics of the oil itself, such as high viscosity, low gas saturation, or high Wax content. It is in the latter type of. reservoir that our invention is most useful for improving recovery, but its utility is not necessarily limited to such ields.`

Overa substantial period of years, many suggestions have been made for improving recovery by applying heat to make. oil more/easily recoverable in va-rious ways, such as by increasing vapor pressure or reducing viscosity. Some of these suggestions have'been tried with varying degrees of success. The usefulnessof many of these methods or suggestions has been limited in a number of ways. For example, some types of reo'overyfopera'- tions may require injection pressures that-are so high as to be uneconomical; the required volumes of gas to be injected may be excessively large `per barrel of liquid recovered; the minimum. temperatures which can be maintained may still be higher than are desirableV or necessary; more of the hydrocarbonsin place may. be consumed than is necessary or. desirable; heat losses may be excessive; only Ione pass through the reservoir formation can be made, and if this is unsuccessful, it cannot be'repeated; the progress of the heat-generating combustion front'or Wave maybe diicult to vary or control; the tarea of operation of the recovery process may be a constantly expanding one, ultimately requiring very large capacities of energy input; and oxygen enrichment may be required at additional expense.

The primary object of our invention accordingly is to provide, for the recovery of heavy oils, tar, and like carbonaceous substances, a process or method which uu'- lizes heat generated by, combustion within the producing forma-tion in a way ormanner which avoids or overcomes most of the foregoing mentioned diiculties or disadvantages. More specic objects of our invention are to provide an underground combustion process by which: (l) a controllable andlimited amountof heat is generated within theL formations, so as toobtain any` desired degree of viscosity-reduction and otheraecompany.` ing effects, without simultaneously causingoverhea-ting, of the formation in places or` overheating: and cracking of the bulk-of the in-plaee hydrocarbons; (2) extraneous fuel may be. utilized.v tor any desi-red; extent 2,901,043 Patented Aug. 25, 1959 ICC to conserve the hydrocarbons it is desired to recover; ('3)` more thanone pass through a given formation can be made whenever desired; (4) the generation of heat acts a's-l an aid to more conventional methods of recovery; (5)- a fractional yrecoveryV can be effected' to recover only the most volatile, and often the most valuable, fractions of the oil in'place, leaving behind only the least desirable heavy constituents; (6) if necessary or desirable, the generation of heat by combustion can be ldiscontinued at any time and restarted or repeated as desired at some later time; (7) recovery can be carriedout'completely in any- Ismall portion of a large tield without affecting the remainder of the eld and Withoutneed for a'large plant investment to supply an everincreasing amount of input energy. Other and further objects, uses, and advantages'of the invention will become apparent as the description proceeds.

Stated ina most brief fashion, theforegoing and other objectsV are accomplished by our invention by performing what may be designatedas backward or'countercurrent'combustion in fractures.

Inconventional recovery processes, involving Ithe injection-l of a drive-producing medium through a firs-t' well and recovery of the products from a second wellspaced at some distance from the first, it is ordinarily considered-"a disadvantage tohave highly permeable streaks or strata extending between the two wells. These are thought to cause channeling of the injected fluids, which results-'inthebypassing of portions of the oil in place. Thus, efforts are ordinarily. made to equalize the formation` permeability by closing off the most permeable streaks, leaving a substantially uniform but somewhat loweroverall value of permeability of the formation to be subjected to the recovery process.

In our invention, on the other hand, such highly permeable horizontal streaks or channels as are normally closed on arenot only necessary, but, if they are not naturally present at the appropriate places, they must be articially created. Our invention accordingly comprises providing at least one input well and one or more output wells spaced therefr-om` in -a producing horizon, which wells are connected Vby either naturally occurring or artiflcially induced horizontal fractures within the producing formation. Combustion is initiated at the bore of the output well inany suitable manner. This combustion is supported by supplying :an oxygen-containing gas, preferably air, alone or in a combustible mixture along with a fuel gas, preferably natural gas. The oxygencontaining gas -or mixture is injected through the input well and flows through the fracture or fracturesto the initiated zone of combustion .at the bore of the output well. This mode of oxygen supply causes the combustion `zone or zones to move slowly through the fractures awayfrom the output well bore toward'the source of oxygen at the input Well.`

During this movement, the heat generated by combustion occurring chiefly within the fractures diffuses verticall-yithrough :the reservoir stratum by conduction through the reservoir rock.- The heavy oil or other carbonaceous material in the rock pore spaces has its viscosity lowered, its vapor pressure increased, and/or one or more of several 1 additional `effects `may occur.

By gravity oW, the reduced viscosity oil or hydrocarbon-may enter the fractures and be driven to the output well by the ow of combustion product gases through the fractures; The heat diffusing throughthe rock may cause evolution of-gases from, Ior vaporization of light components of, the -oil within the rock pore spaces, thereby forcing vthe oil yout of the pore spaces and into the permeable fractures. Also, the heating may be suicient to vaporize the connate water normally present Within most formations, thus subjecting the oil and reservoir rock to a kind of steam-pressure drive and stripping action. Also, the viscosity of the oil may be lowered to the point where the pressure of gas injected within the reservoir rock itself can drive the oil to the output well. Regardless of which one `or what combination of these mechanisms is brought into play, the net result of reservoir heating in the manner described, by diffusion of heat from zones of combustion within fractures, is a substantial increase in the percentage of oil recovery.

This will be better understood by reference to the accompanying drawings forming a part of this application and showing diagrammatically and graphically an ernbodiment of the invention and the relationships of certain variables. In these drawings,

Figure 1 is a diagrammatic cross-sectional view through a section of the earth between two wells which penetrate an oil-bearing stratum to be subjected to recovery according to the invention;

Figure 2 shows logs of varying temperature distributions through the producing and adjacent strata;

Figure 3 is a typical graph of the temperature variation with time at a point within a fracture before and after passage of a combustion zone; and

Figure 4 shows graphs of typical temperature variations as a function of distance from a fracture, at various times relative to the passage of a combustion zone through the fracture.

Referring now to these drawings in detail and particularly to Figure 1 thereof, an oil-bearing stratum 10 is shown diagrammatically in cross section as penetrated by two spaced wells 11 and 12, which are drilled from the ground surface 13 through the stratum 10. Extending horizontally between the Wells 11 and 12 through the stratum are a plurality of horizontal fractures 15, 16, and 17. Besides extending between the wells 11 and 12 as shown on the drawing, it is to be understood that the fractures 15, 16, and 17 normally extend in all directions around the various wells penetrating stratum 10,

of hydraulic fracturing well known in the art, or they may be naturally occurring streaks of high permeability.

The vertical spacing or depth interval of the fractures within the stratum 10 is a matter of some importance. Preferably the fractures are spaced approximately uniformly apart in depth. As in a majority of cases naturally occurring fractures or permeable streaks will not be present at the desired levels within the stratum 10, a usual preliminary step in recovering oil by our process comprises artilicially creating fractures at the desired depths between and around the wells 11 and 12. For example, by hydraulic fracturing, horizontal channels are created around the well 11 extending to distances at least as great as the bore of well 12. These same fractures can then be enlarged and extended further around well 12 by injecting fracturing media into it. In a similar way, other wells not shown can be connected into the original set of fractures created between the two illustrated wells 11 and 12. Also, if desired, the capacity of natural fractures may be enlarged by causing one or more of the articial fractures to pass along them.

The vertical positions of the fractures 15, 16, and 17 with respect to the boundaries of the stratum 16 are also of importance. From the viewpoint of maximum utilization of heat, a single fracture passing horizontally through the center of the stratum would be the most efficient, but this would serve as a gravity drainage flow channel for only the upper half of the formation 10.

For most efficient recovery by gravity drainage, a single channel at the lower formation boundary would be best, but this would involve a loss of about half of the generated heat to the underlying strata. In practice, these two conflicting requirements are compromised by using two or more fractures simultaneously, one of which is preferably near the bottom of the stratum, such as is exemplified by the fracture 17, while the other or others are spaced approximately uniformly throughout the rest of the producing stratum 10 thereabove.

With the fractures 15, 16, and 17 avaliable, the recovery of oil by the process of our invention is begun by initiating combustion at the bore of the output well 12. This may be done in any of several ways. For example, the face of the formation 10 exposed in the bore of well 12 is heated to above the ignition temperature of the combustible gas-air mixture to be burned by means of a well-bore heater. This may be either electrical or one tired by a combustible mixture of gases injected down tubes inserted into well 12. During and/or immediately after the initial heating of the well bore 12, combustionsupporting, oxygen-containing gas is injected down input well 11, whence it iiows through the fractures 15, 16, and 17 to the bore of well 12 where combustion within the fractures then begins. This combustion continues as long as oxygen-containing gas is supplied, while the location of the zones of combustion slowly moves away from well 12 through the fractures toward well 11.

The mechanism by which this countercurrent combustion zone propagation takes place is qualitatively simple, though somewhat difficult to describe quantitatively. Consider a first point within a fracture where combustion is occurring. The heat released at this point flows by conduction through the rock in any direction where the temperature is lower. Thus, the heat travels not only vertically away from the point of combustion, but also horizontally along the fracture in the countercurrent direction. As a result, a second point in the rock at the boundary of the fracture in the upstream direction subsequently becomes heated to a temperature high enough to ignite the combustible gas mixture arriving there, combustion and heat release then occur at the second point, some heat travels to a third point still further upstream, and so on. In reality of course, all these phenomena occur smoothly and in a continuous manner, rather than in the point-to-point fashion assumed for explanation.

As combustion-supporting gases continue to be injected into well 11 and through the fractures to the combustion zones therein, increasingly greater amounts of heat are released within the fractures at the locations of the combustion zones. By conduction this heat diffuses through the reservoir medium to the portions of stratum 10 lying between and above or below the fractures. As the temperature of the oil in stratum 10 near well 12 rises due to this heat transfer, the oil flows to the well bore 12 by any of several paths. By the formation of gas bubbles within the reservoir rock medium, the oil may be forced out of the pore spaces and directly into well 12. By heating, the oil viscosity may be reduced to the point where it iiows readily by gravity to one of the fractures 15, 16, or 17, where the rapidly flowing combustion product gases sweep it along the fracture into well 12. Removal of oil from the interior of the stratum 10 may also be assisted by the vaporization of such connate water as occurs within the rock pore spaces along with the oil, provided the temperature reaches a sufficient level for vaporization of the water at the reservoir pressure existing.

Not al1 of the injected oxygen or oxygen-containing gaseous mixture may How through the fractures, but a minor proportion of the injected gases may iow also through the interior of the stratum 10. Upon reaching a point in the rock space between the fractures where the temperature is high enough for ignition to occur, oxidation utilizing this oxygen occurs to augment the heat car- :existing in the, combustion zone. .rari-.introduced andapaaad by. suitable intervals of, time,

'fried by difusionthrough'ithe rock lfrom the fracture cornbustion zones. The main ybullcofvgeneration of heat,

throughl the reservoir medium. Generally speaking, the

`relative amounts of heat generated within the fractures and within the formation arein about the same ratio as is `the dow of gas in the fractures compared to.that through the formations.

The composition ofthe input gases to well y11 may be varied widely. As compared with concurrent combustion processes,V wherein the combustion zone movement and the fluidflow through the Yformation are inthe same direction, a particular advantage of the present invention isthat, as much gaseous fuel as desired may be incorporated in the input Vgas stream. The combustion zone `nevertheless continues to propagate in the desired countercurrent direction. Thus, it is entirely possible to supply enough natural gas, for example, as fuel in the input stream to consume al=1 of the oxygen, thereby furnishing ally of the heat needed for oil recovery without requiring combustion of any substantial portionof the oil in place. In fact, if desired for any reason, natural gas could constitute a substantially larger proportion of the input gas stream than the amount required to form a stoichiometric mixture with the oxygen. Alternatively, any part of the oxygen may be consumedby the fuel gas injected along with it, and the remainder-of the fuel necessary to utilize the remaining oxygen can -be supplied .by the oil and gas in place. The ultimate that can be accomplished in this direction, of course, is` to supply onlyoxygen in the input gas stream, relying upon the hydrocarbons in place `for the'entire supply of fuel.

Also, as to inert gases or iluids, the composition of the input fluid stream can be varied widely. When using air, which is to be preferred, the inerts may constitute up to about 80 percent of the inputgas stream and are principally nitrogen. This proportion may, if desired, be reduced by enriching the oxygen content of the air by any desired amount up to the use of pure oxygen, which, however, is generally not economical; or the proportion may lbe increased by adding inert gases such as flue gases, additional nitrogen, water vapor, and the like.

The amount of or ratio of inert gases or fluids to oxygen in the input gas stream forms an important manner of regulating the speed of propagation of the fracture combustion zone. For a given rate of oxygen supply, it is apparent that increasing the proportion of inert gases `wil-l decrease the combustion zone propagation rate, as the concurrent heat transfer by the inert gases acts in opposition to the countercurrent heat transfer by conduction through the reservoir rock. The converse of this is also true. Decreasing the proportion of inert gases or fluids in the input gas stream allows the propagation to take` place more nearly at the speed of heat transfer through therock by conduction, upto the point where a maximum propagation rate is obtained -by injection of substantially `purav Oxygen.

A particularly efcient means for controlling, and particularlyfor retarding, the propagation of the combustion `zones in the fractures is the judicious use of water, especially in liquid form. Water in vapor form is good as a heat-transferring inert gas, and therefore presaturating` the input gas stream with water vapor is desirable `when it is needed for slowing down the propagation. Waterin liquid `-formin small-amounts, either asslugs or as a continuous addition to the oxygen-containing gas mixture injectedthrouglr the input well, is even more. efficient at slowing down the countercurrent combustion propagation, as quite large amounts of heat can be absorbed and transferred concurrently by vaporization and condensation., of the liquid water at the temperature levels When slugs of water 6 the .temperature within the fractures may temporarily dropbelow ignition level. However, the interveningperiods between slugs allow al-fverseow of heat from the formations, where the temperature remains high, .back to the cooled fractures to occur in Vorder to re-establish the ignition temperature within the fractures for subsequent injection: of oxygen-containing gases.

Varying the-oxygen'rate alone is a further means of controlling the rate of combustion zone propagation. Combustion and the heat release within the fractures occur substantially indirect proportion to the rate of oxygen injection. Thus a high oxygen input rate means a rapid combustion and release of heat, a high temperature within the fracture, a high rate of diffusion of-heat to the. surrounding yformations, and a relatively high countercurrent propagation rate of the combustion zone along the fracture. The reverse situation is.also true. Low rates of oxygen injectionmean low combustion and heat release rates, low rate of diffusion of heat to the surrounding reservoir, loweredpeak temperatures within the fractures, and lower propagation rates of the combustion zone along the fractures.

Whether the ultimate rise. in temperature that isl obtained within the interior of:aV given formation is what is desired for the recoveryof a givencil depends upon the balance established between the combustion propagation rate and the oxygen input rate. The total input of oxygen per square foot of fracture area covered by thecombustion zone propagation must be such las to supply the total heat required for the recovery of oil from each square foot of the reservoir area `and yallow for heat losses to the adjacent strata. In determining whether the proper oxygen input and propagation rates are being obtained, heat losses` to the adjacent strata canabe neglected as a rst approximation, because the main portion of oil recovery can be expected to occur beforea large fraction of the heatl generated by the combustion crosses the boundaries of the lreservoir stratum andis. lostrto. the :adjacent strata.

If, inl order toy obtain the desired temperature rise, it is necessary to retard the propagation velocity of the combustion zone, the injection of liquid .water is to be preferred as the most eicient and least expensive heat-transferring, propagation-retarding agent. Air is to be preferred as the oxygen-carrying gas Ibecause it is free. When only a small retardation of thepropagation rate is desired, the nitrogen content of the air isusually suflicient to accomplish this. The presence of the nitrogen, however, does increase the compression costs of the air, but these are ordinari-ly less than the cost of separating the nitrogen from t-he input gas stream.

Referring Iagain to the drawings, the temperature conditions within the stratum 10. after kthe combustion zone has propagated along the fractures 15, 16, Iand 17 fora period of time to the position 20, shown in Figure 1, are qualitatively shown by the graphs of Figure 2. The three graphs 21, Y22, and 23 are the temperature profiles or logs as a function of depth which would Ibe obtained along the lines A-A, B-B', andG-C, respectively, shown in Figure vl. In Figure 2, the indications of these logs. or proles-are correlated inposition with the vertical section yof the stratum 10, illustrated at the left of the gure.r

Log 21, the temperature profile taken along theV line A-A, is the temperature distribution obtained just after passage of the combustion zone 20. The maximum temperature T2 is that which is found at the locations ofthe fractures 15, 16, and `17V and is approximately the peak temperature which occurs within the combustion zone in the fractures. AtV the stratum boundaries and mid-Way between thefractures, the temperatures shown-by log 21 are only'slightly above the natural temperature To of the reservoir.

Log 22, corresponding to a temperature log along the line B-B, represents the conditions existing a substantial period of time after the passage of the combustion lZcmfas 20.v A. substantial transfer of heat by diffusion vertically through the stratum 10 has taken place in this time interval, as is evidenced by the decrease of the peak temperatures from the value T2 of log 21, which is accompanied by a rise in the temperatures at the stratum boundaries and within the interior of the stratum 10 midway within the fractures.

Log 23 represents the temperature distribution across the stratum 10 and the immediately adjacent strata at the end of a still larger time interval following passage of the combustion zones 20. This log shows how the conduction or diffusion of heat through the rock eventually brings the temperature throughout the stratum 10 close to an overall value of T1. This is the temperature at which the desired modifications of the oil or hydrocarbon in stratum 10 are obtained to bring about its recovery.

Still further characteristics of the invention are shown by the ygraph of Figure 3. This is a plot of the variations of temperature with time occurring at a point within a fracture, both as the combustion zone approaches, and as it moves past and away from the point. In this case it is assumed that the combustion zone propagation rate along the fracture is one foot per day. This means, incidentally, that the abscissa scale shown as time in days is also numerically the same as the distance in feet from the point in question to the combustion zone 20.

At this velocity in a typical medium, lthe temperature rise due to conduction of heat countercurrently through the rock in a horizontal direction is imperceptible about four days before the arrival of the combustion zone, or in other words about four feet in front of it. The major change in the rate of temperature rise occurs between about one and two days before the temperature zone arrives, that is, when it is still between one and two feet away. During the last day and the last one foot of travel, the temperature climbs rapidly to a value where ignition occurs and heat is released by combustion.

This com-bustion occurs in a relatively short time and space, and the heat so released raises the temperature of the fracture to a high value. This value is difficult to ascertain, as it depends on many factors which determine where the balance occurs between the release of the heat in the combustion and its conduction away from the fracture by the adjacent rock. Obviously, the higher the rate of heat release, as determined by the consumption of oxygen per unit time, the lhigher will be the temperature and the balancing rate of heat diffusion through the rock of stratum 10.

In Figure 3, the temperature change is shown only in arbitrary runits. Its absolute value depends on many Variables which change it quantitatively, Kbut not qualitatively. After the combustion zone passes the assumed observation point and has moved on, the fracture temperature decreases, at first very rapidly, and then considerably more slowly. The major drop of temperature occurs in the first two days, the decline thereafter being more and more gradual.

Still another aspect of the present invention is shown by Figure 4, which presents in greater detail than does Figure 2 the spatial temperature distribution vertically away from a given point in a fracture at several specied times relative to the time of passing of a combustion zone. The conditions for Figure 4 are the same as were applicable to Figure 3, namely, that the movement of the combustion zone is at a velocity of one foot per day. The curve 26, labeled zero days, is the vertical temperature distribution as a function of distance above or below the fracture immediately following the passage of the combustion zone. It is apparent that beyond about 5 feet in a typical reservoir stratum, the Vtemperature rise is negligible at this time. The dashed-line curve 27, labeled one day, is the coresponding temperature distribution one day later. It is apparent here that a major drop in temperature has occurred at the fracture, but the temperature rise more than 8 feet away from the fracture is practically negligible.

The solid-line curve 28, labeled ten days, is the temperature profile after that interval of time, and, as is apparent, a substantial transfer of heat has now taken place to distances of the order of 10 feet or so. The dotted-line curve 29, labeled days, shows that over this interval of distance and time the temperature has become approximately uniform. This means also that a substantial amount of lheat has been lost to the adjacent formations and that the major portion of the recovery of oil should have occurred before this time.

As an example of the operation of our invention, it may be assumed to a first approximation that, if heat losses can be neglected, approximately 0.4 cubic feet per day of a stoichiometric mixture of air and fuel gas should Ibe supplied to each linear foot of fracture zone moving at a propagation rate of one foot per day, for each degree of temperature rise and each foot of formation thickness. Thus, if a recovery operation in accordance with this invention is being carried out on a fivespot well pattern and 10-acre well spacing, with an output well at the center of a square and four input Wells 660 feet away at the corners of the square, a simple calculation utilizing this factor will provide a minimum value of gas input rate at any time during the operation. It is only necessary to multiply together four numbers, one of which is this factor of 0.4, and the product obtained is the minimum number of cubic feet per day of input air and fuel-gas mixture that must be supplied.

Thus, when a combustion front has progressed about half the distance of a 660-foot well spacing in a tive-spot pattern, so that the length of the combustion front is approximately 2,000 feet, if the zone is 30 feet in thickness and is to be heated 200 F. in temperature above the natural level, then the volume of input gas mixture in cubic feet per day is simply 0.4 30 200 2,000, which is about 4.8 million cubic feet per day, assuming that the velocity of propagation is controlled to about one foot per day. Preferably such a formation would be penetrated by several fractures about equally spaced apart vertically by intervals of 5 to 20 feet in thickness.

If the velocity is controlled by inert gas or liquid injection to a value other than one foot per day, then a corresponding adjustment may be made in the input gas rate. For example, if the propagation velocity is only 0.5 foot per day, then the input combustible gas rate similarly should be divided by two, to become 2.4 million cubic feet per day.

Depending on the number and spacing of the frac tures in the producing formation, this minimum input gas rate may be somewhat increased in an actual case to allow for heat losses to adjacent strata and to insure that all portions of the formation are heated to at least a certain minimum extent. In general, the closer together the fractures are spaced relative to the entire thickness of the stratum 10, the closer the input gas rate can be to the minimum value. This is because with closer spacing the heat diffusion from the fractures to the intervening reservoir rock medium takes place in a relatively shorter length of time, the oil in place is more quickly recovered, and in this time interval a smaller proportion of the heat generatedA is lost to the adjacent formations.

It is within the scope of this invention to alter the gas content of the reservoir stratum 10 before initiating combustion by first holding back pressure on the output well 12 while gases are being injected into the input well 11. These gases flow along the fractures 15, 16, and 17 with relative ease and from them permeate the stratum 10 over a wide area. In part, the gas may `go into solution in the oil, and when heat is subsequently generated within the fractures in accordance with the invention, this additional gas saturation within the oil in place, along with such gas saturation as naturally occurs in the oil, results in substantially increased breakout of gas aud formation of bubbles within the reservoir rock medium. This substantially increases the forces available to move the liquid oil, with its viscosity lowered by heating, to the fracture and to the output well 12, or directly to the output well through the reservoir rock.

By initiating combustion at a relatively high level of static formation pressure and by lowering this pressure during the recovery process, a substantial increase in percentage of oil recovered is often obtainable, especially in the case of low gas saturation oils. The energy added to the reservoir oil by increasing the initial static pressure and gas saturation therein is largely recovered by the additional breakout of gas and the gas drive which takes place upon the occurrence of heating. This is generally a quite efficient way to utilize the driving energy of gasmuch more so than merely circulating gas through the formation from an input to an output well to entrain or drive liquid through the rock pore spaces by gas 110W alone.

While we have thus described our invention in terms of the foregoing embodiment and specific details, it is to be understood that other and further modications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The invention therefore should not be considered as limited in scope to the specific details set forth, but its scope is properly to be ascertained by reference to the appended claims.

We claim:

1. In a method of recovering a high viscosity oil from an underground producing formation in which it occurs, wherein heat is generated by combustion within said producing formation, the improvement which comprises the steps of drilling at least two spaced wells into said formation, one of said wells being an input well and the other of said Wells being an output well; initially providing at least one generally horizontal fracture extending continuously through said formation between said wells, said fracture having a gas ow capacity which is large compared to the gas ow capacity of said formation without said fracture; thereafter initiating combustion at the depth of said formation within the bore of said output well; injecting a cool combustion-supporting gas through said input well to ilow primarily through said fracture to support said combustion and to propagate a zone of combustion chiefly along said fracture back toward said input well; controlling the composition and injection rate of said combustion-supporting gas so that the equivalent of at least about 0.4 cubic foot of a stoichiometric mixture of air and gaseous fuel is consumed per foot of length of said zone, per foot of propagation, per foot of thickness of said formation, per degree F. of temperature rise necessary to reduce the viscosity of said oil to a predetermined level where it will flow easily to said output well, whereby the major portion of the heat generation takes place in said fracture, and the oil in said formation above and below the combusion zone in said fracture is heated primarily by the heat diffusing generally vertically through said formation from said fracture, and whereby the temperature of most of said oil remains substantially below a level where cracking takes place; and recovering from said output well the oil which is released from said formation by said diffusing heat and which enters said output well.

2. In a method of recovering a high viscosity oil from an underground producing formation in which it occurs, wherein heat is generated by combustion within said producing formation, the improvement which comprises the steps of drilling at least vtwo spaced wells into said formation, one of said wells being an input well and the other of said wells being an output well; initially providing a plurality of generally horizontal fractures extending through said formation continuously between said wells and through the area of said formation surrounding said wells, said fractures being spaced through said formation at approximately uniform intervals of depth of between about 5 and 20 feet, the lowermost of said fractures being near the lower boundary of said formation, and the ow capacity of said fractures for gas being large compare to the gas ow capacity of said formation without said fractures; thereafter initiating combustion at the depth of said formation within the bore of said output well; injecting a cool combustion-supporting gas through said input well to ow primarily through said fractures to sup port said combustion and cause zones of combustion to enter and propagate chiefly along said fractures back toward said input well; controlling the composition and injection rate of said combustion-supporting gas so that the equivalent of at least about 0.4 cubic foot of a stoichiometric mixture of air and gaseous fuel is consumed per foot of length of combustion zone, per foot of propagation, per foot of thickness of formation to be heated from each of said fractures, per degree F. of temperature rise necessary to reduce the viscosity of said oil to a predetermined level where it will flow easily to said output well, whereby the major portion of the generation of heat takes place within said fractures, and the oil in place in said formation between and above and below the combustion zones in said fractures is heated primarily by the heat diffusing generally vertically through the formation from said fractures, and whereby the temperature of most of said oil between said fractures remains substantially below a level where cracking occurs; and recovering from said output well the oil which is released from said formation by said diffusing heat and which enters said output well.

3. In a method of recovering high viscosity oil as set forth in claim 2, the step of adding to said combustionsupporting gas a proportion of inert heat-transferring fluid effective to retard the propagation rate of said combustion zones through said fractures so that substantially more than the equivalent of 0.4 cubic foot of a stoichiometric mixture of air and gaseous fuel is consumed per foot of length of the combustion zones, per foot of propagation, per foot of formation thickness to be heated by each zone, per degree F. of temperature rise necessary to educe the viscosity of said oil to a desired predetermined evel.

4. In a method of recovering a high Viscosity oil, steps as set forth in claim 3 wherein water is injected along with said combustion-supporting gas as said inert heattransferring uid.

References Cited in the tile of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,494,735 Cooper May 20, 1924 2,497,868 Dalin Feb. 2l, 1950 2,584,606 Merriam et al Feb. 5, 1952 2,630,307 Martin Mar. 3, 1953 2,693,854 Abendroth NOV. 9, 1954 2,754,911 Spearow July 17, 1956 2,780,449 Fisher et al Feb. 5, 1957 OTHER REFERENCES Development of an Underground Heat Wave for Oil Recovery, Journal of Petroleum Technology, May 1954, pp. 23-33.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1494735 *Jan 18, 1922May 20, 1924Steiger Cooper AugustusWinning ammonium gas
US2497868 *Oct 10, 1946Feb 21, 1950David DalinUnderground exploitation of fuel deposits
US2584606 *Jul 2, 1948Feb 5, 1952Frederick SquiresThermal drive method for recovery of oil
US2630307 *Dec 9, 1948Mar 3, 1953Carbonic Products IncMethod of recovering oil from oil shale
US2693854 *Apr 16, 1952Nov 9, 1954Standard Oil Dev CoFormation of zones of high permeability in low permeability formations
US2754911 *Jun 24, 1953Jul 17, 1956Ralph SpearowOil production method
US2780449 *Dec 26, 1952Feb 5, 1957Sinclair Oil & Gas CoThermal process for in-situ decomposition of oil shale
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3004594 *Nov 19, 1956Oct 17, 1961Phillips Petroleum CoProcess for producing oil
US3004597 *May 19, 1958Oct 17, 1961Phillips Petroleum CoInitiating in situ combustion in a carbonaceous stratum
US3007520 *Oct 28, 1957Nov 7, 1961Phillips Petroleum CoIn situ combustion technique
US3010513 *Jun 12, 1958Nov 28, 1961Phillips Petroleum CoInitiation of in situ combustion in carbonaceous stratum
US3010707 *Jul 20, 1959Nov 28, 1961Phillips Petroleum CoRecovery of resins and hydrocarbons from resinous type coals
US3023807 *Jun 19, 1958Mar 6, 1962Phillips Petroleum CoIn situ combustion process
US3026935 *Jul 18, 1958Mar 27, 1962Texaco IncIn situ combustion
US3048223 *Dec 29, 1958Aug 7, 1962Phillips Petroleum CoIgnition and production of carbonaceous strata
US3055422 *Oct 16, 1958Sep 25, 1962Phillips Petroleum CoIn situ combustion process
US3072186 *Aug 11, 1958Jan 8, 1963Phillips Petroleum CoRecovery of hydrocarbons by in situ combustion
US3072187 *May 12, 1960Jan 8, 1963Phillips Petroleum CoProduction and upgrading of hydrocarbons in situ
US3072190 *Mar 30, 1959Jan 8, 1963Phillips Petroleum CoIgnition for in situ combustion
US3097690 *Dec 24, 1958Jul 16, 1963Gulf Research Development CoProcess for heating a subsurface formation
US3113619 *Mar 30, 1959Dec 10, 1963Phillips Petroleum CoLine drive counterflow in situ combustion process
US3126954 *Dec 30, 1959Mar 31, 1964 Unburned zone
US3135324 *Dec 7, 1959Jun 2, 1964Phillips Petroleum CoPrevention of ignition in air injection wells
US3136359 *Aug 11, 1961Jun 9, 1964Graham Thomas TMethod of treating oil wells
US3145772 *Sep 13, 1962Aug 25, 1964Gulf Research Development CoTemperature controlled in-situ combustion process
US3159215 *Sep 23, 1958Dec 1, 1964California Research CorpAssisted petroleum recovery by selective combustion in multi-bedded reservoirs
US3170515 *Jun 12, 1961Feb 23, 1965Jersey Prod Res CoIn-situ combustion process
US3208514 *Oct 31, 1962Sep 28, 1965Continental Oil CoRecovery of hydrocarbons by in-situ hydrogenation
US3208519 *Jul 17, 1961Sep 28, 1965Exxon Production Research CoCombined in situ combustion-water injection oil recovery process
US3221812 *Apr 25, 1963Dec 7, 1965Shell Oil CoUse of antioxidants in underground combustion control
US3228468 *Dec 8, 1961Jan 11, 1966Socony Mobil Oil Co IncIn-situ recovery of hydrocarbons from underground formations of oil shale
US3250327 *Apr 2, 1963May 10, 1966Socony Mobil Oil Co IncRecovering nonflowing hydrocarbons
US3250328 *Nov 19, 1963May 10, 1966Shell Oil CoOil production method utilizing in situ chemical heating of hydrocarbons
US3275076 *Jan 13, 1964Sep 27, 1966Mobil Oil CorpRecovery of asphaltic-type petroleum from a subterranean reservoir
US3280910 *Mar 20, 1964Oct 25, 1966Mobil Oil CorpHeating of a subterranean formation
US3349847 *Jul 28, 1964Oct 31, 1967Gulf Research Development CoProcess for recovering oil by in situ combustion
US3384172 *Nov 19, 1965May 21, 1968Pan American Petroleum CorpProducing petroleum by forward combustion and cyclic steam injection
US3385362 *Oct 26, 1966May 28, 1968Mobil Oil CorpThermal recovery of viscous oil with selectively spaced fractures
US3398793 *May 27, 1966Aug 27, 1968Marathon Oil CoProcess for rapid reignition of in situ combustion
US3411575 *Jun 19, 1967Nov 19, 1968Mobil Oil CorpThermal recovery method for heavy hydrocarbons employing a heated permeable channel and forward in situ combustion in subterranean formations
US3422892 *Mar 29, 1965Jan 21, 1969Air ReductionSupply of high-pressure combustion-supporting gas to wells
US3449247 *Oct 23, 1965Jun 10, 1969William J BauerProcess for wet oxidation of combustible waste materials
US3451478 *Nov 1, 1965Jun 24, 1969Pan American Petroleum CorpNuclear fracturing and heating in water flooding
US3997005 *Oct 23, 1975Dec 14, 1976The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Energy Research And Development AdministrationMethod for control of subsurface coal gasification
US4375302 *Mar 3, 1980Mar 1, 1983Nicholas KalmarReacting nahcolite and dawsonite with sodium hydroxide containing a surfactant
US5456315 *Feb 1, 1994Oct 10, 1995Alberta Oil Sands Technology And ResearchHorizontal well gravity drainage combustion process for oil recovery
US7640987Aug 17, 2005Jan 5, 2010Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Communicating fluids with a heated-fluid generation system
US7740062Jan 30, 2008Jun 22, 2010Alberta Research Council Inc.System and method for the recovery of hydrocarbons by in-situ combustion
US7770643Oct 10, 2006Aug 10, 2010Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Hydrocarbon recovery using fluids
US7809538Jan 13, 2006Oct 5, 2010Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Real time monitoring and control of thermal recovery operations for heavy oil reservoirs
US7832482Oct 10, 2006Nov 16, 2010Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Producing resources using steam injection
DE1231638B *Apr 23, 1964Jan 5, 1967Shell Int ResearchVerfahren zur Gewinnung von Kohlenwasserstoffen aus kohlenwasserstoffhaltigen Formationen
U.S. Classification166/259, 166/261, 166/260, 166/258
International ClassificationE21B43/16, E21B43/243
Cooperative ClassificationE21B43/243
European ClassificationE21B43/243