|Publication number||US2913602 A|
|Publication date||Nov 17, 1959|
|Filing date||Nov 3, 1955|
|Priority date||Nov 3, 1955|
|Publication number||US 2913602 A, US 2913602A, US-A-2913602, US2913602 A, US2913602A|
|Inventors||Ivan L Joy|
|Original Assignee||Ivan L Joy|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (8), Referenced by (36), Classifications (21)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Nov. 17, 1959 L. JOY 2,913,602
METHOD AND MEANS FOR mmsm'rrmc ELASTIC WAVES Filed Nov. :5, 1955 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 CCCCCCCCCCCCC Crw 1 kw wN M Nov. 17, 1959 1.. JOY
METHOD AND MEANS FOR TRANSMITTING ELASTIC WAVES 2 SheetsSheet 2 Filed. Nov." 3, 1955 fizz/6125297 fVanLx/fy.
IVIETHOD AND MEANS FOR TRANSMITTING ELASTIC WAVES Ivan L. Joy, Topeka, Kans.
Application November 3, 1955, Serial No. 544,741
8 Claims. (Cl. 310-83) This invention relates to a method and means for transmitting elastic waves between a transducer and a body under test and more particularly is concerned with improving the efiiciency of elastic wave transmission through transducer holders that are intended for use in instances wherein there is relative movement between the transducer and the body under test.
Transducer holders of the type referred to above are characterized by a confining chamber in which the transducer is mounted for intimate contact with a suitable liquid couplant. At least a portion of the chamber wall is made of elastic wave transmitting material and this wall portion is located in the path of the elastic waves and is adapted for coupling to the entering surface of the body under test.
The principal object of the invention is to increase the efiiciency of elastic wave transmission through transducer holders of the type described above.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent during the course of the following description.
In the accompanying drawings forming a part of this specification and in which like numerals are employed to designate like parts throughout the same,
Figs. 1 and 2 are sectional views of two different transducer holders of the general class to which the present invention is applicable; and
Fig. 3 is a fragmentary sectional View showing a modification of the holder of Fig. 2.
A variety of coupling liquids are known to be effective for transmitting elastic waves between a transducer and a solid body and each exhibits its own particular advantages and disadvantages. For instance; castor oil has the property of high attenuation and hence is useful in situations wherein it is desired to avoid standing waves; silicone oil is inert and hence finds application when holders using rubber diaphragms are employed; and water is cheap and plentiful.
According to the invention, it has been found that the elastic wave transmitting ability of any of these or similar coupling liquids is importantly enhanced by mixing an appropriate quantity of metallic particles therewith. This includes such substances as white lead, powdered iron, powdered aluminum or aluminum oxide, and presumably any other powdered metallic substances.
In tests metal particles having a diameter less than one-thousandth of an inch have been employed and this appears to be the most desirable arrangement. This specific disclosure, however, is purely illustrative and is not intended to impose undue limitations upon the range of particle sizes.
In the case of any of these substances it has also been noted that standing wave problems are eliminated and While this seems anomalous in view of the increased transmission characteristics, this phenomenon is apparently due to the presence of a large number of interfaces provided by the dispersed metallic particles.
" In general, the transmission characteristics of the coupling liquid mixture improve as the proportion of solid particles increases, however, such increases ultimately reduce the ability of the crystal holder to adapt itself to the surface contours of the body under test and/or to accommodate crystal movements. For the types of transducer holders discussed herein a ratio by volume of one part solid particles to two or three parts coupling liquid has been found satisfactory. Obviously the specific ratios recited are not critical and may be varied in accordance with the requirements of the particular application.
Referring now to the drawings, and particularly to Fig. 1, there is shown a transducer holder 10 that is intended for use in the ultrasonic testing of joint bars 11, such as are used to connect adjacent rails, and other similar ob-.
jects which are characterized by the fact that the surface 12 through which the ultrasound enters is of a rough and irregular contour. Only the end portion of the joint bar 11 is shown in the figure.
The transducer holder comprises a base 13 which may be made of Bakelite or some such similar insulating material, a piezoelectric crystal 14 mounted on the base, a rubber diaphragm 15 for confining coupling liquid for contact with the crystal, a handle 16 connected to the base 13 by suitable screws 17, and a pair of wires 18 for supplying potential variations to the crystal.
The front face of the base is formed with a stepped recess that provides an annular shoulder 20 and the crystal is mounted on the base by cementing the outer marginal portions thereof to the shoulder 20. The arrangement provides an air gap 21 behind the crystal 14 and a couplant confining chamber 22 in front of the crystal. The base is also provided with a bore 23 to facilitate filling the compartment 22 with couplant 25 and back flow is prevented by sealing the bore with a screw 24.
The wires 18 enter the holder through a coaxial connector 26 mounted in the free end of the holder 16, pass through an axial bore 27 formed in the handle and thence through the Bakelite base 13 for connection to the front and rear faces of the crystal. For this purpose the crystal faces are provided with suitable coatings of silver, copper, or other electrically conductive material.
In accordance with the invention the couplant 25 in chamber 22 may consist of a mixture of a coupling liquid of any chemical composition that will not be destructive. of the metallic coating on the front face of the crystal- 14 or to the rubber diaphragm 15 and metal particles as described above.
In testing joint bars and the like with the holder 10, it is desirable to first clean the surface 12 through which the ultrasound is to pass and apply a suitable wetting liquid thereto. The wetting liquid may be oil or water and preferably should not be harmful to the rubber diaphragm 15. The rubber diaphragm is preferably onehalf wave length thick or a multiple thereof, this wave length being selected in relation to the speed of propagation of the ultrasound through the diaphragm.
The handle 16 of the holder is grasped and the diaphragm 15 placed against the surface 12 of the body under test and effective ultrasonic contact between the joint bar 11 and diaphragm 15 is readily obtained by applying a slight pressure. This slight pressure insures that the rubber diaphragm conforms to the irregular contours of the rough surface 12 and achieves the desired ultrasonic contact with but a minimum of coupling liquid between the diaphragm and the test part.
Since the holder 10 is applied to the testing of bodies having rough entering surfaces, it is necessary to vary the orientation of the crystal relative to the entering surface in order to select experimentally an angle of incidence such that the ultrasound will be directed through the entire length of the object under test. The rubber diaphragm responds to the slight pressures imposed and closely conforms to the contour of the entering surface 47 is mounted for angular movement.
ployed in' the confiningchamberlz; Shouldan undulyhigh proportion of metal particles be employed, the ability of the rubber diaphragmtolfollow the contour of the test surface would ultimatelybe limited by the increased rigidity of thelcouplant mixture.
" It is believed that the ability of metal particleslto in-.
crease the elastic wave transmission efficiency of. acoupling liquid depends in part upon the .maintainingof a. v
homogeneous mixture. In the broadest aspect ofthe invention, of course, the solid particles may be mixed in a coupling liquid'whether the liquid is confined as inthe present case or whether it is freelyflowing, and in either case, will enhance the efficiency of transmission.- However, in a holder wherein the coupling liquid is confined the. vibrational energy of the elastic .waves passing through 'the couplant mixture tends 'to maintain the particles in suspension and therefore produce a couplant medium of the highest transmissionefiiciency.
It' has been found that the thickness of the chamber 22 in the direction'of elasticwave propagationshould not exceed one-quarter of an inch. When this figure is exceeded attenuation increases unduly and limits the effectiveness of the arrangement. 7 Fig. 2 illustrates another form of transducer holder 40 which is of the variable angle type and which is used in the'tcsting of axles or other surfaces 41, the entering surface 42 of which is more regular than the end surfaces of joint bars, The holder-4t) consists of I a metal shell 43 to which is secured a mounting block 44 on which a rubber diaphragm 45 is secured for defining therewith a confining chamber 46 in which the crystal is cemented at its outer marginal portions to an annular shoulder 49 that is provided by forming a stepped recess in the front face of a Bakelite base 4- 8. rangement the crystal is mounted with its back face The crystal 47 I With this arstill a different reason, such asin thetesting of rail as to permit the base 48 to move freely under the control of the screw 52 and bias spring'53. Here again the passage of the ultrasonic energy through the coupling mixture maintains the solid particles in suspension within the coupling liquid and increases the efficiency of transmission.
No insulating problemshave arisen from the use of metal particles in the couplant mixture. Such problems can be avoided completely, however; by. pattitioningthe chamber 46 and as'shown in'the fragmentary view of Fig. 3, this may be done by connecting an auxiliary diaphragm 69 between the side walls of diaphragm .and the base 48.. This auxiliary diaphragm is preferably of thin rubber material and. yields sufi'iciently to accommodate all necessary movements of the pivoted base 48.
Another advantage of the diaphragm 60 is that it limits the confining chamber to the region through which the ultrasound must pass. 'This is desirable from the standpoint of controlling the ratio of the couplant mixture. 7
It will be noted that in the case of the holder of Fig.
l, the movement of the crystal relative to the test sur-- face was necessitated by the roughness of this surface whereas in the case of the holder of Fig. 2, the movement of the crystal accomplished a scanning of the test part and/or permitted detection of defects regardless of their plane of-orientation. wherein the crystal moves relative to the test surface for and here againthere is the particular advantage that.
. the passage of. the ultrasound through the confined coubonded by an air gap 50 and with its front face in open communication with the couplant chamber 47.
The. base. 48 is mounted for angular movement and for this purpose is hinged at one end to a projectnig arm of a bracket 51 that is secured to the mounting block .45 and has its opposite end associated with a screw 52- that is threadedly received in the mounting block. In addition, the'base is spring biasedby a coil spring '53 and thus is urged inwardly by advancing the screw 52',
metallic coatings on the front and-;rear faces of the.
In testing solid bodies with the holder 4 0 -;the metal 7 frame 43 is normally maintained stationary relative to the entering surface of. the body under test and the positioning of the screw 52 is varied to vary-the 'angle of orientation of the crystal 47-. With :this arrangement the crystal is able to scan asolid body simply by varying.
the angle of orientation of the crystal. Similar variable angle crystal holders find use in applications wherein. it
is desired to test a body with ultrasound that is transmitted at a plurality of angles of incidence in orderto insure the detection of all of the flaws in'the body irre- I spective of the plane in which they are-oriented.
In this instance the crystal 47 is shown curved; and
this permits the beams of ultrasound 55 to be focused to'facilitate the inspection of particular regions within the'object and also to' intensify the beam andpermit-the detection .of smaller defects.
The couplant mixture is designated 56 andgonce again mustvhave a sufiicientlylow proportionfof solidlpar-ticles pling mixture maintains the solidparticles in suspensionv and achieves a maximum of transmission efficiency.
It should be understoodthat the description of the preferred form of the invention is for the purpose of complying with section 112, title 35, of the US. Code and that the appended claims should be. construed as broadly as the prior art will permit.
said transducer and body comprising a mixture of coupling liquid and metal particles. 7
2. In an ultrasonic system for testing a body with elastic waves by means of an electromechanical transducer wherein there is relative movement between the transducer and the body'under' test; a transducer holder having a confining chamber wherein said transducer is mounted in intimate contact with a couplantcomprising a mixture of coupling liquid and metal particles, said chamber having 'an elastic wave transmitting wall portion disposed in the elastic wavepath'between said transducer and said body. a
' 3. In an ultrasonic system for testing a body wit elastic waves by means of l an electromechanical transducer that is movable relative to the'body under test;
a transducer holder having a confining chamber wherein said transducer is mounted in intimate contact with a' couplant comprising a mixture of coupling liquid and metal particles, said chamber having an elastic wave transmitting wall portion disposed in the .elasticwave path between said ,transducer and saidbody, said wall portion. being yieldable to conform to the contourof the surface of the body through which the elastic waves pass. V
4. The combination with an electromechanicalelastic wave generator that generateselastic wave energyfortransa;
There are other applications Changes in rail contour require movement of the testing apparatus wherein elastic vimission into a solid body through an entering surface of said body, of a holder for said generator having a confining chamber in which said generator is mounted in intimate contact with a couplant comprising a mixture of coupling liquid and metal particles, said chamber having an elastic wave transmitting wall portion disposed in the elastic wave path between said generator and said body so that elastic waves passing between said generator and said body maintain said particles in suspension in said liquid and increase the elastic wave transmission eificiency.
5. In an ultrasonic testing apparatus wherein elastic vibrational waves are transmitted between an electromechanical transducer and a solid body, a couplant between said transducer and body comprising a mixture of. coupling liquid and metal particles, the ratio by volume of coupling liquid to metal particles being substantially 3 to 1, with the metal particles having a diameter on the order of one thousandth of an inch.
6. The arrangement of claim 4 wherein the ratio by 6 volume of coupling liquid to metal particles is substantially 3 to 1.
7. The arrangement of claim 4 wherein the ratio by volume of coupling liquid to metal particles is substantially 3 to 1, with the metal particles having a diameter on the order of one thousandth of an inch.
8. The arrangement of claim 4 wherein the elastic wave transmitting wall portion of said chamber is spaced not more than M4" from said generator.
References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,427,348 Bond et al Sept. 16, 1947 2,458,581 Firestone et al Jan. 11, 1949 2,532,507 Meunier Dec. 5, 1950 2,592,134 Firestone Apr. 8, 1952 2,671,545 Petroif Mar. 9, 1954 2,687,054 Nelson Aug. 27, 1954 2,715,189 Ots Aug. 9, 1955 2,792,829 Calosi May 21. 1957
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2427348 *||Aug 19, 1941||Sep 16, 1947||Bell Telephone Labor Inc||Piezoelectric vibrator|
|US2458581 *||May 21, 1946||Jan 11, 1949||Sperry Prod Inc||Supersonic inspection|
|US2532507 *||Jul 18, 1946||Dec 5, 1950||Acec||Feeler for elastic waves|
|US2592134 *||Jun 28, 1945||Apr 8, 1952||Sperry Prod Inc||Method of supersonic inspection|
|US2671545 *||Jul 20, 1949||Mar 9, 1954||Stewart Warner Corp||Magnetic fluid clutch|
|US2687054 *||Sep 4, 1951||Aug 24, 1954||Nelson Gorman R||Magnetic fluid variable torque wrench|
|US2715189 *||Sep 11, 1951||Aug 9, 1955||Acec||Apparatus for emitting and receiving elastic waves|
|US2792829 *||Feb 6, 1952||May 21, 1957||Raytheon Mfg Co||Frequency modulated ultrasonic therapeutic apparatus|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3138219 *||Jul 28, 1959||Jun 23, 1964||Schlumberger Well Surv Corp||Electroacoustic transducer apparatus|
|US3168659 *||Jan 11, 1960||Feb 2, 1965||Gen Motors Corp||Variable focus transducer|
|US3200901 *||Apr 20, 1964||Aug 17, 1965||Basseches Mark T||Loud-speaker|
|US3230503 *||Jun 22, 1962||Jan 18, 1966||Elliot Jr Jack||Transducer|
|US3239801 *||Dec 18, 1964||Mar 8, 1966||Automation Ind Inc||Liquid lens ultrasonic beam controlling device|
|US3269173 *||Mar 2, 1962||Aug 30, 1966||Transformatoren & Roentgenwerk||Apparatus for ultrasonic diagnosis|
|US3309655 *||Aug 25, 1965||Mar 14, 1967||Transformatoren & Roentgenwerk||Ultrasonic diagnostic vibration transducer|
|US3325781 *||Jul 7, 1966||Jun 13, 1967||Branson Instr||Dual transducer probe for ultrasonic testing|
|US3339666 *||Oct 27, 1964||Sep 5, 1967||Pat Mcdonald||Pulsed high frequency acoustic logging|
|US3470868 *||Jun 7, 1965||Oct 7, 1969||Siemens Ag||Ultrasound diagnostic apparatus|
|US3525977 *||Dec 21, 1967||Aug 25, 1970||Us Navy||Apparatus and method for controlling cavitation|
|US3620326 *||Feb 20, 1970||Nov 16, 1971||Us Navy||Athermal acoustic lens|
|US3625484 *||Jun 16, 1969||Dec 7, 1971||Albert G Bodine||Monopole elastomeric resonator|
|US3650094 *||Dec 19, 1969||Mar 21, 1972||United Aircraft Corp||Acoustical filtration system|
|US3661146 *||Dec 31, 1969||May 9, 1972||Anvar||Transducer arrangement for measuring blood flow|
|US3730121 *||Feb 19, 1963||May 1, 1973||Us Navy||Acoustic torpedo test apparatus|
|US3800275 *||Sep 2, 1960||Mar 26, 1974||Us Navy||Acoustic image conversion tube|
|US3982223 *||Jul 10, 1972||Sep 21, 1976||Stanford Research Institute||Composite acoustic lens|
|US4184094 *||Jun 1, 1978||Jan 15, 1980||Advanced Diagnostic Research Corporation||Coupling for a focused ultrasonic transducer|
|US4326275 *||Sep 27, 1979||Apr 20, 1982||Hazeltine Corporation||Directional transducer|
|US4410826 *||Apr 12, 1982||Oct 18, 1983||Diasonics, Inc.||Ultrasonic imaging apparatus using a coupling fluid mixture of propylene oxide, ethylene oxide derivative and glycerine|
|US4452084 *||Oct 25, 1982||Jun 5, 1984||Sri International||Inherent delay line ultrasonic transducer and systems|
|US4704708 *||Oct 4, 1985||Nov 3, 1987||Mobil Oil Corporation||Acoustic borehole logging tool|
|US4893624 *||Jun 21, 1988||Jan 16, 1990||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Diffuse focus ultrasound hyperthermia system|
|US5054470 *||Dec 5, 1989||Oct 8, 1991||Laboratory Equipment, Corp.||Ultrasonic treatment transducer with pressurized acoustic coupling|
|US5426980 *||Jul 19, 1993||Jun 27, 1995||General Electric Company||Booted ultrasonic transducer|
|US5546360 *||Nov 14, 1994||Aug 13, 1996||Deegan; Thierry||Electrically steered acoustic lens|
|CN102792159A *||Nov 2, 2010||Nov 21, 2012||乌尔里希·佐伊特||Coupling element for acoustically coupling a sound transducer to a body, and sound transducer comprising said coupling element|
|DE3315649C1 *||Apr 29, 1983||Jun 28, 1984||Krautkraemer Gmbh||Ultrasonic test head for nondestructibly testing hot specimens|
|DE3814367A1 *||Apr 25, 1988||Dec 29, 1988||Mannesmann Ag||Method and device for the ultrasonic material testing of workpieces|
|EP0081033A1 *||Aug 2, 1982||Jun 15, 1983||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Ultrasonic scanner|
|EP0095619A2 *||May 11, 1983||Dec 7, 1983||INTERATOM Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung||Couple medium for acoustic coupling at high temperatures, and method for its application|
|WO1984001830A1 *||Sep 22, 1983||May 10, 1984||Stanford Res Inst Int||Inherent delay line ultrasonic transducer and systems|
|WO1989007907A1 *||Mar 2, 1989||Sep 8, 1989||Laboratory Equipment, Corp.||Ultrasound brain lesioning system|
|WO1989007909A1 *||Mar 2, 1989||Sep 8, 1989||Laboratory Equipment, Corp.||Ultrasound localization and therapy system|
|WO2011050991A1 *||Nov 2, 2010||May 5, 2011||Ulrich Seuthe||Coupling element for acoustically coupling a sound transducer to a body, and sound transducer comprising said coupling element|
|U.S. Classification||310/336, 601/21, 181/402, 310/335, 367/166, 181/400, 60/911, 601/2, 73/644, 366/114|
|International Classification||G10K11/02, G10K11/32|
|Cooperative Classification||G10K11/32, G10K11/02, Y10S181/40, G01N29/28, Y10S60/911, Y10S181/402|
|European Classification||G01N29/28, G10K11/02, G10K11/32|