|Publication number||US2915122 A|
|Publication date||Dec 1, 1959|
|Filing date||Jan 16, 1956|
|Priority date||Jan 16, 1956|
|Publication number||US 2915122 A, US 2915122A, US-A-2915122, US2915122 A, US2915122A|
|Inventors||Hulse Donald S|
|Original Assignee||Hulse Donald S|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (5), Referenced by (20), Classifications (8)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Dec- 1, 1959 D. s. HuLsE 2,915,122
FRACTURING PRocEss WITH SUPERIMPosED CYGLIC PRESSURE Filed Jan. 16, 195s at greater rates.
United States Patent() FRACTURING PROCESS WITH SUPERIMPOSED CYCLIC PRESSURE Donald S. Hulse, Salt Lake City, Utah Application January 16, 19'56, Serial No. 559,462
7 Claims. (Cl. 166-42) This invention relates to the treating of subterranean formations, such as those containing crude petroleum or other valuable fluids, by the application of hydraulic pressure. This invention particularly relates to an improved method for hydraulically fracturing such underground forrnations in which successive shock 'pressure waves are superimposed upon the applied hydraulic pressure either before or after the formation breakdown pressure is reached, or both. This procedure has been found to result in the formation of a large plurality of underground fractures rather than one or only a few, and to result also in the injection of larger quantities of fluid and propping agent into the fractured formation than heretofore obtainable.
There has been recently developed a welltreating process for hydraulically fracturing selected underground geologic strata by the application of relatively high hydraulic pressures. This process is referred to as the Hydrafrac process and the object is to increase the fluid permeability of selected underground formations so that fluid can be injected into or produced from them These hydraulic processes are described sufliciently in U.S. Patents No. 2,596,843, 2,596,- 844 and 2,596,845 and accordingly they will only be briefly described here.
In general, the aforesaid Hydrafrac process consists of injecting a gel or low penetrating fluid, such as one having a high viscosity or a low penetration rate or which forms a filter cake, into the well bore where it is positioned adjacent the formation to be treated. A high hydraulic pressure is generated by pumping the fluid into the bore faster than it penetrates the formation. Many specific liquids have before been disclosed in the literature which have the foregoing properties so as to adapt them for this particular purpose. The hydraulic pressure is increased in this mannerover a period of from l-l minutes to a value which exceeds the formation breakdown pressure. At this time the overburden is lifted causing fissures to penetrate from the bore into the surrounding strata and the fluid then flows through these fissures. The formation breakdown pressure is roughly equal to the weight of the rock above the fissures being formed plus the bonding force of the rock itself. 'For wells deeper than about 4,000 feet, this breakdown pressure ranges between about 0.6 land about 0.9 p.s.i. (lbs. per square inch) per foot of depth of the stratum below the surface. The low penetrating fluid desirably contains propping agents such as sand grains of selected size which hold the fissures open after release of the applied hydraulic pressure. Pumping continues after breakdown for a period of from 30 to 100 minutes to deepen the fissures by injection of more fluid. y
newly formed fissures into the bore at substantially increased rates, or an injection fluid can flow into the formation at increased rates in the case of an injection well.
This system for permeability formation treating is a marked improvement over nitroglycerin detonation because it is operable in cased perforated bore holes. It is cheaper and quicker than lateral drilling from the bore hole, and it is superior to acid treating because it is not restricted to the treatment of calcareous strata.
The foregoing process as generally described usually results in the formation and opening of at most a few and generally only one relatively large horizontal fracture. This is due to the fact that when one weak spot or incipient fracture begins to give way the fluid enters and the pressure decreases so that there is a decreased tendency then to open additional features. This is a disadvantage, and the formation of many small fissures is much more desirable, particularly in the fracturing of relatively thick formations. The present invention therefore relates to an improvement in the hydraulic fracturing process in which a greater plurality of relatively small fractures is formed, a greater quantity of fracturing fluid may be injected into the formation, and the resulting fractured formation is capable of producing substantially increased quantities of valuable fluid or receiving hydraulic fracturing process by applying a succession of pressure shocks to the fracturing fluid after the formation breakdown pressure has been reached so as to increase the quantity of low penetrating fluid injected into the strata and to generate deeper fissures in these formations.
It is also an object of this invention to provide in the hydraulic fracturing process a relatively continuous series of shock pressures during pressure build-up to the formation breakdown pressure as well as after the breakdown vpressure is reached to produce a great plurality of deep fissures in the formation being treated.
It is an additional object of this invention to provide a hydraulic fracturing process in which normal well fluids are purged or displaced from adjacent the area by flowing the low penetrating fluid upwardly through the bore hole prior to building up the high pressures necessary to fracture the formation.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art asthe description and illustration thereof proceed.
Briefly the present invention comprises an improved hydraulic fracturing process for the treatment of underground fluid-permeable or fluid-containing strata in which any of the conventional low penetrating fluids or gels are pumped into the bore and positioned adjacent to the strata to be treated. If desired, a special valve hereinafter described is opened near the bottom of the tubing string and part of the low penetrating fluid is passed upwardly through the annulus to purge normal well fluids from adjacent the stratum to be treated. This valve is lthen closed and the hydraulic pressure is increased by pumping a low penetrating fluid into the bore hole at a rate which is higher than the rate at which the unfractured stratum can accept fluid flow. This pressure buildup is continued until it reaches a value adjacent the stratum face suflicient to lift the formation causing cracks or fissures to open from the bore back into the drops somewhat from the maximum value anda substantial quantity of the low penetrating fluid is pumped into the newly opened fissures so as to enlarge them and cause them to progress a substantial distance into the lstratum from the bore.
The specific improvement of this invention lies in the modication of this part of the well treating process to incorporate a series of applied pressure shocks tothe column of fluid in thewell bore in such a way that they are superimposed upon the applied hydraulic pressure as described above.
In one modification of the invention, a plurality of mechanically induced pressure shocks is applied directly to the low penetrating fluid being pumped into the well head. The formation breakdown pressure is approached gradually by pumping a continuous stream of low penetrating liquid into the well, and with the pressure shocks being superimposed on the gradually increasing pumping pressure, the breakdown pressure is actually approached in a series of steps in which the pressure is rapidly increased, then lowered slightly, then rapidly increased to a higher value, then lowered to a value higher than the previous low, etc. until the actual breakdown pressure is attained. Preferably this build-up continues over a somewhat longer period than normal, such as from about 5-30 minutes.
The pressure shocks are applied directly to the column of liquid at the well head by means of an air hammer or a piston or other suitable apparatus. 4 This pressure shock is transmitted without substantial lo-ss or attenuation downwardly through the column of liquid standing in the tubing string and is applied directly to the exposed face of the stratum being treated. During the hydraulic pressure build-up the series of shock waves apparently applies high local stress to all of the incipient fractures in the stratum so as to weaken them. Then when the formation breakdown pressure is finally attained, a greatv many of the then weakened fractures open instead of only one or a few such fractures. These results have been indicated through the physical testing of the present invention wherein substantially increased quantities of fluid are injected into the formation and subsequently increased quantities of product fluids flow therefrom into the bore.
In another modification of this invention, the hydraulic pressure is built up to the formation breakdown pressure in the normal way by pumping liquid into the bore.
When the formation breakdown pressure is reached and the fissures form, the series of pressure shocks is begun and continued during the flow of low penetratingfiuid into the open fissures. In this way the fractures which are opened are greatly deepened and extended to greater distances from the boreV into the formation, or the required time for the same degree of fissure deepening is considerably reduced. This is indicated by a substantial increase in the quantity of low penetrating fluid which can be injected during the treatment.
A preferred third modification of the present invention lies in combining the two modifications describedl above so as to secure the advantage of each modificationand whereby each unexpectedly enhances the results ofthe other. Thus when the low penetrating fluidpressure increase is begun the shock wave application is also begun at the well head and continued substantially throughout the entire period of pressure application, thatl is, during the pressure build-up to the formation-breakdown pressure as well as after this pressure is reached and while fluid injection is continued. is a greater number of stratum fissures formed because of the weakening of all of the incipient fractures, but they are then extended greater distances intothe stratum by the shock wave application. The overall result of such a treatment is a treated well whose fluid productivity is measurably increased by amounts of the order-of 25% ln this modification not only 4 to about greater than that of a bore treated by the conventional hydraulic fracturing methods.
In practicing the process of the invention, any of the conventional low penetrating fluids can be used so as to build up a pressure to the formation breakdown value. Also any appropriate gel breaker or other fluids specifically adapted to facilitate removal of, or other action on, the low penetrating fluid may also be used in the process. of this invention. Such fluids are all described in the art referred to previously. The low penetrating fluid may be modified to contain formation propping agents to facilitate the maintenance ofv open fissures after removal of the applied hydraulic pressures. Such agents and the manner of their use are also described in the art.
The process of the apparatus in this invention will be more readily understood by reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Figure 1 shows an elevation view in a partial cross section of a cased well bore and the tubing string with a single packer in which the process of this invention is effected, a double packer for isolating a selected stratum interval for treatment also being shown,
Figure 2 is a graphic illustration of the application of hydraulic pressure to the formation breakdown value together with applied shock waves, and
Figure 3 shows shock wave application after the formation breakdown value is reached, as well as the preferred modification in which the shock waves are applied both before and after the stratum is fractured.
Referring now to more particularly Figure l, well bore 10 is provided with casing 12 and tubing string 14 extending downwardly from ground level 16 through several non-permeable strata 18 and Ztl into a fluid-permeable fluid-containing stratum 22. A water shut-off in the form of a concrete seal 24 surrounds the lower end of casing 12'. and prevents the loss of valuable fluids upwardly around the outside of the casing. A slotted liner 13 may be added if desired.
The upper end of casing 12 is provided with lubricator 26 having a tubing seal 28 through which tubing string 14 extends. Line 30 provided with valve 32 opens from the casing head as shown. At the upper end of tubing string 14 is provided hammer 34 supported by means 36 from the derrick. Hammer 34, for example,` consists of a cylinder containing lower piston 3S and upper piston 40. Inlet line 42 permits the introduction of fluid under pressure as a series of impulses thereby causing upper piston 40 to apply a series of direct impacts against lower piston 38. Air or water or oil or any suitable fluid can be used to drive piston dit.
The hammer 34 communicates directly at its lower end with the top of tubing string 14m through shut-off valve 44 and second check valve 46. The fracturing liquid is pumped by means of pump 50 through line 48, shut-ofi` valve 52 and first check valve S4 into tubing string'14 at a point between valves 44 and 46.
The bottom of tubing string 14 is provided with packer 56 which seals the outside surface of the tubing string against the inside surface of the casing adjacent its lower end. When treating a stratum at intermediate depths in a well bore packers should be provided both above and below the strata to be treated as shown by broken lines. In such a case apertures '71 are provided as an exit for the low penetrating liquid which is pumped down the tubing string. In any event, with the packer in place, the tubing string is lifted a distance sufficient to raise inner valve element 58 with respect to outer valve element 60 to exposed one or more rows of apertures 62 in the outer valve element. The fracturing fluid flow is then begun by opening valve 52 and starting pump 5l), and with shut-off valve 44 closed. The fluid flows through check valves 54 and 46 downwardly through tubing string. 14 and through apertures 62, so as to purge from the annulus at least a part of the fluids normally present there. Preferably, sufficientv fluid is allowed to ilow so as to fill the annulus with oil or other liquid to a substantial depth above the top of packer 56.
VThe annulus may if desired be lled up to outlet line 30.
In any case, the liquid column in the annulus acts as a support for tubing 14 and packer 56 during application of extreme pressure shocks. After the annulus is filled to the desired extent, the tubing string is then lowered whereby the inner valve element 58 descends so as t0 cover apertures 62 and to seat its lower edge 64 against a soft metal insert 66 disposed as shown in Figure 1.
The above-described valve, in addition to being used as described as a means of readily adding liquid to the annulus 10 after packer 56 is set in lower end of casing 12, is also used yin the displacement of the supporting liquid from the annulus by the injection of compressed gas into the annulus at the top via line 30 after the fracturing job is completed. Also, because of the travel of inner element 58 in valve body 60, it may be used to jar packer 56 loose in case it sticks in the casing after frac- "turing job is complete.
The ow of fracturing fluid is then continued into space 68 opposite permeable stratum 22. The pressure is then increased by operating pump 50 at a relatively high rate so as to deliver more fluid than can normally flow into permeable stratum 22 through its exposed face 70. The pressure therefore rises toward the formation breakdown Value at which point the plurality of the incipient fissures 72 open as at 74 and progress inwardly along the weakened fracture planes into formation Z2.
As discussed briefly above, this result is vobtained by employing either one or both of the specic modications described and in which a series of pressure shock waves is applied downwardly through the liquid column by the means illustrated in Figure 1. With the liquid pressure applied by means of pump acting downwardly through check valves 54- and 46 and tubing string 14, shut-off valve 44 is opened which causes the iluid pressure to force lower piston 33 upwardly against stop 76. Upper `piston 40 may be maintained normally in an elevated position by means of a spring 78. The injection of actuating fluid through line 42 in a series of pulses causes upper piston 40 to reciprocate and apply a series of direct impact shocks against lower piston 38. This in turn applies a series of pressure shock waves directly to the liquid column in tubing string 14 whereby the shock waves are transmitted downwardly through valves 445 and46 and tubing string 14 to the face 70 of permeable stratum 22. After each shock wave is applied the reverse llow of liquid upwardly through tubing string 14 is prevented by means of check valve 46, although the continued injection of fracturing fluid is permitted by check valve 54 thereby returning lower piston against stop 76. This sequence of steps and the apparatusdescribed permits the carrying out of any of the three process modications briefly described above.
In Figures 2 and 3 are shown plots of the hydraulic pressure existing at the well head at various times during the well treatment process, or as a function of the quanpeaks 82 and pressure lows S4 during the pressure buildj up are shown. In this way a substantially increased number of incipient fractures are weakened whereby each is permitted to open when the formation breakdown vpressure at 80 is finally reached. After the formation breakdown pressure is attained, the pressure drops somewhat during the increased ilow of liquid into the opened fractures. This continues until the applied pressure is released as at point 86 and then the pressure rapidly falls.
In Figure 3 the pressure variations in the second and third modifications of this invention are shown. In the lows linear portion 8S to the formation breakdown pressure at 80, following which the pressure shocks are applied so as to produce a series of pressure peaks and pressure lows 92. This continues until the pressure is released at point 86 as before and then the pressure decreases. In the third modification, the pressure shock series is employed both during the pressure build-up and after breakdown as described in Figure 2 and pressure peaks 82 and pressure lows 84 appear during this initial eriod of the process.
The application of the modifications of this invention to actual producing wells is as described below: Of course, kthe same procedure is applicable vto injection wells also.
Example 1 The conventional hydraulic fracturing technique was `applied to a subsurface oil producing formation which to a value of 31 barrels per day. This constitutes an 82% increase in productivity.
Example 2 In the same oil ield in a well penetrating the same formation, the improved process of this invention was employed in its first modification. The previous productivity of this well had lbeen 9.5 barrels per day. Gelled gasoline was pumped into the well bore as the low penetrating fluid over a period of about 10 minutes, during which time the applied pressure was built up to the formation breakdown value and pressure shock waves were applied at a rate of about 15 per minute. Each of these shock waves when applied increased the then existing fluid pressure at the Well head by an amount approximately 700 p.s.i.g. Following attainment of the formation breakdown pressure the usual hydraulic fracturing techniques were followed and the well was again placed on production. The equilibrium production rate of the thus treated well was measured at 21 barrels per day. This constitutes a 121% productivity increase, which in turn is an increase approximately 47% greater than that experienced in Example 1.
Example 3 In a third well penetrating the same formation in the.
same oil eld as in the previous two examples, the production rate prior to treatment was 19 barrels a day. Gelled gasoline was again employed as the low penetrating lluid, the conventional technique was employed to raise the pressure of the fluid to the formation breakdown value, and thereafter a series of 700 p.s.i. shock waves at about 15 per minute was maintained during the injection period. Following pressure release the equilibrium productivity of the thus treated well was found to be 37 barrels per day, or a 95% increase over the untreated value.
Example4 In a fourth well in the same eld and stratum penetrated by the wells in Examples 1, 2, and 3, the original productivity was 8 barrels a day. Gelled gasoline was again employed as the low penetrating tiuid. During the 10 minute interval while the formation breakdown pressure was being approached, pressure shocks of about 700 p.s.i. were applied at about 15 per minute directly to the tluid being injected until the formation breakdown pressure was attained. The pressure shocks were then continued for approximately 15 minutes during which time a substantial liuid injection into the fractured stratum was noted. The gel breaker liquid was introduced after the pressure release and the well was `treatment described in Example 4.
returned to production. The equilibrium production rate was measured at 31 barrels a day; this amounts to an increase of 184%.
Example The procedures of the previous example were applied to a well 4200 feet deep to fracture the permeable formation at that level and simultaneously to remove a paraffin deposit accumulated from waxy crude which had all but blocked the borehole opposite the strata. In this operation the low penetrating fluid used gas oil which was pumped through a steam heated heat exchanger. The oil was heated to about 350 F. and pumped into the hole.
lThe'pressure was first raised to about 800 p.s.i. to force the hot oil through the waxy cake into the strata for about -15 minutes, then it was released through. the tubing causing the well to ow. This was repeated several times until the strata appeared to take substantial quantities of gas oil at the V800 p.S.i. applied pressure indicating that the paraflinblock had been broken. Following these steps, the process of this invention as illus- Atrat'ed in the above Example 4 was applied building up gradually to about 3000 p.s.i. The pressure shocks applied here were about 600 p.s.i.y This treatment not only removed the paraffin block, but also effected a fracturing of the formation. The well productivity increased about 60%, i.e. from about 20 barrels per day to over about 100 barrels per day, leveling off at about 32 barrels per day.
v Example 6 The well in Examplel was produced for about 30 daysat the Slbarrels per day rate. ln an attempt to determine the effect of a second application of conventional hydraulic fracturing, the previous treatment was repeated at the applied pressures previously used. Although at this pressure additional iluid entered the strata,
'-no pressure break characteristic of further formation fracture was noted. Replacing the well on production substantiated this by showing the same productivity.
This well was then treated using the pressure shock The pressure was built up to the breakdown value in about l0 minutes during which 750 p.s.i. shock pressures were applied at the rate of 50 per minute. The new breakdown pressure value was found to be 250 p.s.i. below the first fracture, indicating the effective weakening of incipient fractures. This application was continued after the breakdown. After the well was replaced on production, the equilibrium production rate was determined to be 38 barrels per vday,.i.e. a further Vincrease of about 40% above the original conventional treatment. lt is believed that the final production rate would have been greater than 38 barrels per day had the pressure shock treatment been applied in the first instance because of a greater incipient fracture these fractures deepeningthem well back into thestratum.
Thus the permeability increase is substantially greater and the productivity or" the well is materially improved.
'The pressureshochs applied in the process of this invention are usually between about 50 and 5000 p.s.i. above the applied hydraulic pressure.' The frequency of application is preferably between about'S and 500per minute although the heavier `shocks maybe applied at frequencies as low as about oneper minute and the lighterv shocks may be applied at frequencies as high as about preferred because of the tremendous inertia ofthe 4 system. The so-called sonic and supersonic frequencies beginning at about 3G00 cycles per minute are inapplicable for this reason and appear .to have little eectin the practice of this invention. Y l
A particular embodiment of the present invention has been hereinabove described in considerable detail by way of illustration. it should be understood that various other modications and adaptations thereof may be made by those skilled in this particular art without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention as set forth in the appended claims. i f I claim: l. In a process for hydraulically fracturing a subterranean formation penetrated by a well bore wherein a fracturing liquid is pumped down the well bore and forced against the face of said formation under continuous and gradually increasing pressure until thepressure of said liquid against said face lexceeds the breakdown pressure of said formation and causes said `forma-tion to fracture, and the said pumping is thereafter continued to force said fraeturing liquid against the face of the formation and into the fractures so formed to extend the lengthof said fractures, the improvement which consists in applying to the top of the column of fracturingA liquid in the well bore a cyclically varying pressure the amplitude and frequency of which are controlied independently ofthe pumping pressure, said cyclically varying pressure being applied to said fracturing liquid while continuing the pumping of said fracturing liquid against the face of 'said formation andsaid cyclically varying pressure being transmitted through the said column of liquid and applied to the said face of said formation as a cyclically varying pressure superimposed on said pumping pressure. ,y
2. A process according to claim l wherein said cyclically varying pressure is appiied only until the initial fracturing of the formation occurs.
3. A process according to claim l wherein said cyclical- 5. A process according to claim lkwherein the said cyclically varying pressure has a frequency between about 1 and about 1000 cycles per minute.
6. A process according to claim l wherein the said fracturing liquid is pumped down the well bore through a well tubing string, and the annulus between said tub- 1 ing string and the walls of the well bore is filledwith a liquid to a height substantially above the location of said formation. .f
7. The process for hydraulically fracturing a subterranean formation penetrated by a well bore which comprises disposing'within said well bore a well tubing having its upper' end extending above the earths surface and its lower end in communication with said formation; setting at feast one packer between said well tubing and the walls of the boreto isolate said yformation from the rest of the bore; pumping a fracturing liquid down said weiltubing and against the exposed face of said formation, said pumping being continued without interruption and at continuously increasing pressure until the pressure exerted by said-liquid against the exposed face of said formation exceeds the breakdown pressure of said formation, whereby the latter is caused to fracture; continuing to pump said liquid down said well tubing and against lthe exposed face of said formation under Suthcient pressure to force said liquid into the fractures-previously formed, whereby said fractures are extended in length; and during said pumping applying to the top of the column of said liquid in said well tubing at the earths surface a cyclically varying pressure the amplitude and frequency of which are controlled independently of said pumping pressure, whereby said cyclically varying pressure is transmitted down the column of liquid in said well tubing and is applied against the exposed face of said formation superimposed upon and in addition to said pumping pressure, the peak amplitude of said cyclically varying pressure being between about 50 and about 5000 p.s.i.g. above the said pumping pressure and the 10 cyclic frequency being between about 5 and about 500 cycles per minute;
References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,354,570 Benckenstein July 25, 1944 2,676,662 Ritzmann Apr. 27, 1954 2,680,485 Bodine June 8, 1954 2,712,355 Hoi July 5, 1955 2,753,940 Bonner July l0, 1956 Notice of Adverse Decision in Interference In Interference No. 92,867 involving Patent No. 2,915,122, D. S. Hulse, FRACTURING PROCESS WITH SUPERI-MPOSED CYCLIC PRES- SURE, nal judgment adverse to the patentee Was rendered July 30, 1964, as to claims 1, 2, 3, 4C and 6.
[Oficial Gazette May 18, 1.965.]
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2354570 *||Mar 28, 1941||Jul 25, 1944||Height Benckenstein Charles||Process of increasing permeability of sands and strata|
|US2676662 *||May 17, 1949||Apr 27, 1954||Gulf Oil Corp||Method of increasing the productivity of wells|
|US2680485 *||Jul 23, 1948||Jun 8, 1954||Bodine Jr Albert G||Apparatus for augmenting the flow of oil from pumped wells|
|US2712355 *||Dec 20, 1949||Jul 5, 1955||Standard Oil Co||Hydraulic fracturing of earth formations|
|US2753940 *||May 11, 1953||Jul 10, 1956||Exxon Research Engineering Co||Method and apparatus for fracturing a subsurface formation|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3113621 *||Apr 18, 1960||Dec 10, 1963||Union Oil Co||Subterranean well treatments using a vibrational field|
|US3130552 *||Mar 28, 1961||Apr 28, 1964||Method and apparatus for creating a load|
|US3332496 *||Aug 19, 1965||Jul 25, 1967||Hydro Torq Pump Company Inc||Fracturing apparatuses|
|US3427652 *||Jan 29, 1965||Feb 11, 1969||Halliburton Co||Techniques for determining characteristics of subterranean formations|
|US3520362 *||Aug 4, 1967||Jul 14, 1970||Hughes Tool Co||Well stimulation method|
|US3602311 *||Jan 23, 1970||Aug 31, 1971||Western Co Of North America||Pressure pulse hydraulic fracturing for subsurface formations|
|US3923099 *||Mar 27, 1975||Dec 2, 1975||Brandon Orpha B||Methods of well completion or workover of fluid containing subsurface formations|
|US3933205 *||Jan 27, 1975||Jan 20, 1976||Othar Meade Kiel||Hydraulic fracturing process using reverse flow|
|US3965982 *||Mar 31, 1975||Jun 29, 1976||Mobil Oil Corporation||Hydraulic fracturing method for creating horizontal fractures|
|US4022275 *||Jul 6, 1976||May 10, 1977||Orpha B. Brandon||Methods of use of sonic wave generators and modulators within subsurface fluid containing strata or formations|
|US4398769 *||Nov 12, 1980||Aug 16, 1983||Occidental Research Corporation||Method for fragmenting underground formations by hydraulic pressure|
|US4407365 *||Aug 28, 1981||Oct 4, 1983||Exxon Production Research Co.||Method for preventing annular fluid flow|
|US4456069 *||Jul 14, 1982||Jun 26, 1984||Vigneri Ronald J||Process and apparatus for treating hydrocarbon-bearing well formations|
|US4471838 *||Feb 16, 1982||Sep 18, 1984||Albert G. Bodine||Sonic method and apparatus for augmenting fluid flow from fluid-bearing strata employing sonic fracturing of such strata|
|US7568525 *||Sep 27, 2005||Aug 4, 2009||Nord Service, Inc.||Method and system for increasing well rate using well-capital-string perforation|
|US8714257||Sep 22, 2011||May 6, 2014||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Pulse fracturing devices and methods|
|US20060086504 *||Sep 27, 2005||Apr 27, 2006||Nord Service Inc.||Method and system for increasing well rate using well-capital-string perforation|
|DE1533585B1 *||Jun 2, 1967||Jan 28, 1971||Brandon Clarence William||Aufbrechverfahren zur Erdoel- oder Erdgasgewinnung|
|EP2607608A1 *||Dec 21, 2011||Jun 26, 2013||Welltec A/S||Stimulation method|
|WO2013092798A1 *||Dec 20, 2012||Jun 27, 2013||Welltec A/S||Stimulation method|
|U.S. Classification||166/249, 166/177.5, 192/106.00F, 166/308.1|
|International Classification||E21B43/25, E21B43/26|