|Publication number||US2917054 A|
|Publication date||Dec 15, 1959|
|Filing date||Apr 22, 1955|
|Priority date||Apr 22, 1955|
|Publication number||US 2917054 A, US 2917054A, US-A-2917054, US2917054 A, US2917054A|
|Inventors||Touey George P|
|Original Assignee||Eastman Kodak Co|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (20), Referenced by (10), Classifications (9)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
G. P. TOUEY 2,917,054
FIBROUS TOBACCO SMOKE FILTER CONTAINING SOLID ADDITIVE Dec. 15, 1959 Filed April 22, 1955 F/LAMENTS FIG.1.
FILTER WRAPPER R m H. F
' FIG. 2.
c/a/wsrrz WRAPPEK George R Touey INVENTOR. M 2 L 4 ATTORNEYS United States FIEROUS TUBACCD SMOKE FILTER CGNTAIN- ENG SOLE) ADDITIVE Application April 22, 1955, Serial No. 503,183
4 "Claims. (Cl. 131-203) The present invention relates to tobacco smoke filtering material and elements thereof suitable for use in cigarettes, pipes, cigarette holders, and cigar holders. More particularly, the invention is concerned with an improvement in filters of the general type disclosed in Crawford and Stevens U.S. Patents Nos. 2,794,239 and 2,794,480 of June 4, 1957.
In the aforementioned patents, newly discovered advantages of a certain type of fibrous tobacco smoke filter are discussed. The filter therein described is prepared from a specially conditioned tow of synthetically spun continuous filaments and comprises a structurally unitary rod-like mass of fibers and a wrapper encircling the mass, each fiber of the mass being substantially coextensive therewith, the fibers as a whole being in substantial alignment longitudinally of the mass but substantially each of the individual fibers having a plurality of short portions thereof crimped into diverging and converging relationship to the main fiber axis, a plurality of the fibers having surface solvation bonds to contiguous fibers at random points of contact. Very good results have been obtained in the use of such filters for the removal of nicotine and tars from tobacco smoke, especially in view of the fact that the filters supply other requirements, such as a unitary nature, rigidity, and resiliency, which are equally as necessary to the success of a tobacco smoke filter.
These filters aiso have a marked processing advantage over other filters known in the art. However, since the fibers in such filters are generally parallel to each other, some channeling of the smoke through the filter may be possible.
In other words, while a desirable amount of interference with the smooth flow of combustion products through the channels is provided by the random bonds between adjacent fibers, by the incompleteness of fiber orientation, and by the short fiber portions which are crimped into diverging and converging relationship to the main fiber axis, yet a limited amount of the smoke passing through the filter apparently travels through channels in a smooth, non-turbulent and undisturbed manner and thereby may be exposed to somewhat less than a theoretically maximum amount of impingement upon and contact with the solid surfaces of the filter. Experimental investigations have shown that any attempt to reduce the size or change the shape of the detrimentally smooth smoke channels through the filters by an increase in filter density either through greater compaction of the fiber mass or through the use of finer fibers generally also results in an intolerable increase in pressure drop through the filter. It is also unsatisfactory to substantially increase the amount of fiber crimp in order to obtain an increase in the amount of smoke 2,917,054 Patented Dec. 15, 1959" impingement by increasing the number of divergent and convergent fiber portions.
In my copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 413,950, filed March 3, 1954, I have disclosed and claimed an improvement based on my discovery that the efiiciency of filters of the type described above may be substantially increased without the expected equivalent increase in pressure drop through the filters by preparing the filters with deposits of finely divided solid vegetable starch particles in the smoke channels provided by the spacing of adjacent fibers. The starch particles are carried by and supported on the surfaces of the fibers. Among the powdered, relatively pure starches specifically enumerated in the said copending application are those derived from wheat, potatoes, rice and tapioca.
I have now discovered that an impure, i.e., nonconcentrated starchy material (namely, ordinary wheat flour) provides a filtration efiiciency equally as high as the relatively pure starches and exhibits an unexpected and advantageous distinction in that it adheres to the tow fibers more firmly than most of the starch powders. Thus, during the fabrication, packaging, and use of the filters and cigarettes produced therefrom, those filters containing wheat flour are completely resistant to being sifted out of the tow.
This invention, therefore, has as one object the production of an efiicient cigarette smoke filter consisting of a fibrous filtering material, particularly a material comprising a bundle of substantially longitudinally oriented textile fibers infused with finely divided wheat flour particles. Another object is to provide means for increasing the efficiency of a cigarette filter prepared from a textile fiber. A still further object is provision of a filter which is capable of removing nicotine, tars, and other deleterious components of cigarette smoke without causing the smoke to be dry or distasteful. Another object is to increase the efiiciency of tobacco smoke filters of the Crawford and Stevens applications without creating a high pressure drop. Still another object is to provide a firmly adhering particulate additive for fibrous tobacco smoke filters, particularly those fibrous filters prepared with fibers bonded through a coalescence obtained by means of the application of a spray of a liquid, solvent-type plasticizer. Other objects will be obvious from the present specification and claims.
Accordingly, the present invention consists, in general, in a fibrous tobacco smoke filtering medium, for example, one comprising a mass of substantially longitudinally aligned fibers, the spacing of substantially all groups of adjacent fibers providing minute passages for smoke therethrough, said mass carrying therein finely divided wheat flour particles in an amount of 1 to by weight of the mass (the concentration not being critical so long as there is sufficient wheat flour present to improve the filtration efiiciency of the filter without creating excessive pressure drop), said particles being supported along the surfaces of and by the fibers and occupying positions along the walls of and partially blocking said passages whereby a substantial portion of the smoke is impinged on the particles.
A more specific and very advantageous embodiment of the invention comprises a new tobacco smoke filtering material of synthetically spun continuous filaments and an element made therefrom, the element comprising a structurally unitary rod-like mass of fibers and a Wrapper encircling the mass, each fiber of the mass being substantially coextensive therewith, the fibers as a whole being in substantial alignment longitudinally of the mass but substantially each of the individual fibers having a plurality of short portions thereof crimped into diverging and converging relationship to the main fiber axis, a plurality of the fibers having surface solvation bonds to contiguous fibers at random points of contact, the mass carrying substantially uniformly dispersed therein a solid finely divided wheat fiour in the amount of about 5 to 60% by weight of the mass.
Most advantageously, the invention comprises a filter of cellulose acetate fibers having surface solvation bonds achieved through the application of a plasticizer spray, the filter carrying un formly dispersed wheat flour partides in the amount of about 5 to 30% by weight of the filter.
Any suitable means known to the art for spreading a powder onto a fibrous surface or through a fibrous mass may be employed in preparing filters of the invention. Thus, for example, the wheat flour powder can be blown onto the fibers or it can be ap lied as a slurry in cold water or in a volatile organic vehicle or a plasticizer for the fiber. Another method is to apply the fiour to the fibers electrostatically, i.e. to induce a charge on the fibers by f iction or other suitable means and then to run the fibers through a chamber containing a highly concentrated cloud of fiour dust. Preferably this is done with the fibers in the form of a tow and in a banded, i.e. spread-out condition. Still another method for applying the flour particles is to wet the surface of the fibers with an adhesive or a plasticizer before exposing them to a fiour spraying device. Preferably, the flour is continuously applied to an opened and banded moving tow formed as described in the Crawford and Stevens patents. That is to say, tow from a supply roll is opened to debundlize the filaments and provide a larger and more uniform tow cross section. and the opened tow is spread uniformly to a much larger width of e.g.. times its original width, thereby exposing substantially all of the filaments to material, i.e. plasticizer, issuing from a dispenser adiacent which the tow passes. The flour may be added before, simultaneously with, or after the plasticizer, preferably with or after.
The invention is illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which Fig. 1 represents a magnified view of the interior of a mass of filtering material prepared in accordance with the invention, and
Fig. 2 is a view of cigarette having attached thereto a tip prepared from a filtering material of the invention.
The invention is further illustrated in the following examples:
EXAMPLE l.-FlLTRATION EFFICIENCY A partially opened tow of a crimped, regular crosssection cellulose acetate yarn (39.2% acetyl) having about eight crimps per inch and containing approximately 12,- 000 filaments of five denier per filament was slowly pulled over a corresponding air banding device as disclosed in the aforementioned Crawford and Stevens patent applications and in Jackson US. patent application Serial No. 356,983, filed May 25, 1953, now U.S. Patent No. 2,737,688 which spread out the fibers to a width of about twelve inches. While the tow was in this spread condition it was sprayed uniformly with finely divided droplets of di-(methoxyethyl) phthalate plasticizer in order to make numerous portions of the surfaces of the fibers adhesive. The spread tow was then passed through a dusting chamber which dusted the fibers with a finely divided (325 mesh) wheat flour of a type commercially available and designated as bleached, enriched hard wheat fiour and said to contain 14.0% protein, 67% starch and 13% moisture, the remainder consisting of fats, sugars, and inert fibrous material. After this spreading, spraying, and dusting, the tow was pulled back to its original shape of a cord and fed into a conventional cigarette make-up machine which formed it cylindrically, wrapped it with paper, and cut it into rods 78 mm. in length and 8 mm. in diameter. The rods had the approximate composition of 25% flour, 14% plasticizer and 61% cellulose acetate by weight. The filter rods were then given a heat treatment for one hour at 80 C. to cause partial solvation of the acetate fibers by the plasticizer and thereby bond the flour particles to the fibers and the fibers to each other; imparting firmness to the rods. Thereupon the rods were readily cut into 13 mm. filter tip lengths and attached to king-size cigarettes of a standard brand available on the retail market in the US. The cigarettes were first shortened by 13 mm. and the rods aflixed to the remainder by means of an adhesive tape. These filter cigarettes were smoked to a total butt length of 35 mm. on a smoking machine similar in design and operation to the smoking machine described by J. A. Bradford, W.R. Harlan and H. R. Hanmer in Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 28, pp. 836-9 (1936). The smoke which passed through the cigarettes was collected and analyzed for nicotine and tar content.
Control filters without a powdered additive were also prepared from the same cellulose acetate yarn containing the same amount of plasticizer. These filters were attached to the same brand of standard king size cigarettes shortened by 13 mm. These cigarettes were also smoked to a total butt length of 35 mm. by means of the smoking machine. The smoke which passed through the cigarettes was collected and analyzed for nicotine and tar content.
Ten unfiltered king size cigarettes which were not shortened by 13 mm. were smoked to a butt length of 35 mm. by means of the smoking machine. The smoke which passed through the cigarettes was collected and analyzed for nicotine and tar content.
The results obtained from the three sets of cigarettes are listed in Table I.
1 Pressure drop in inches of water at an air flow rate of 17.5 cc.lsec.
From the results listed above it can be seen that the filter containing the combination of acetate fibers and Wheat flour reduced the amount of tar collected by 38.5% and the amount of nicotine collected by 40%. The control filter reduced the amount of tars collected by 9.2% and the amount of nicotine collected by 8%. The increase in pressure drop of the filtered cigarette due to the addition of the flour to the filter Was only about 5%.
EXAMPLE 2.LOSS OF ADDITIVE BY SIFTING OUT In order to determine how firmly the wheat flour adheres to the fibers in the finished filter plug, a series of crimped cellulose acetate tow fibers containing various powders was prepared according to the procedure described in ,Example 1. The cellulose acetate tow employed was identical to that described in Example 1 and contained the same kind and amount of plasticizer sprayed on its surface. The types and amounts of powders in-' corporated into the filter plugs are listed in the table below. The degree to which the powders adhered to the 78-min. filter plugs was determined by dropping a plug in a vertical position a distance of 12 inches onto a smooth glass surface. The plug was considered to resist sifting out of the powder if no visible amount of powder appeared on the glass surface after the plug was dropped six times in succession. The results of this drop test are also listed on the table below.
Type and Amount of Powdered Results of the 12" Drop Test Additive in the Plug Activated silica gel, 325 mesh, 22% Activated aluminum oxide, 325
TracDe of powder after 1st drop.
Activated charcoal, 250 mesh, 18%. Do. Talc, 325 mesh, 20% Do. Calcium carbonate, 325 mesh, 21% Do. Titanium oxide, 325 mesh, 15% D 0. Trace of powder after 2nd drop. Traclg of powder after 3rd drop.
Trace oipowder alter th drop.
In carrying out the operation of this invention, the type of Wheat flour employed is not a critical factor. Rather, the form of the flour is more important. The flour should be in a finely powdered form so that it can be readily slurried in a liquid or passed through a spraying nozzle. While the exact size of the particles does not appear to be critical, it is indicated that the flour additive should be capable of passing through a 200 mesh screen and probably should be no finer than 500 mesh. Advantagcously, a flour is used which has at least 80% of its particles of a diameter less than the diameter of the fibers of the filter. No substantial number of particles should be as large as twice the filament diameter or as small as one-tenth the filament diameter. Any source of flour which passes this requirement can be employed. Such commercial types of wheat flour as bleached, unbleached, whole-wheat, whole bran, selfrising and the like may be employed.
While unusually good results have been obtained with filters prepared from a crimped continuous filament tow of cellulose acetate fibers sprayed with a plasticizer, e.g. di-(methoxyethyl)phthalate or methylphthalylethylglycolate, it will be recognized by those skilled in the art that the usefulness of the invention extends to other fibrous filters, including those prepared from such fibers for example, of viscose, cotton, nylon, polyamides, polyesters, particularly where the fibers are in substantial longitudinal alignment and are coextensive with the body of the filter. It is preferred to use for filter preparation in accordance with the present invention a continuous strand, e.g. tow, of 4,000 to 35,060 filaments, the filaments being of 16 to 3 denier and having about 4 to 10 crimps per inch.
By the expression surface solvation as used herein is meant the creation, by the action of a solvent or plasticizer and/or heat, of an adhesive, tacky or readily bonding condition of the filaments by solution or incipient solution of surface portions of the filament material whereby there is produced a welding and adhesion between adjacent filaments contacting at such portions, and by coalescence" is meant the situation caused by partial or incipient solvation of surface portions of the filaments and resulting in a condition within those portions under which the portions will flow into or unite with similar portions of dissolved or plastic material in contiguous filaments. Surface solvation bonds between fibers are sometimes also referred to as fused or welded bonds.
It is to be noted that while the filters of the present invention seem to derive special benefits from the properties and behavior of wheat flour itself, yet the invention, in essence, appears to be dependent upon the structural character of the filter. In this regard, the more important structural factors found in the most advantageous form of the invention seem to be:
(1) That the aligned filaments be randomly bonded at 6 randomly spaced intervals. This may be achieved by spraying a solvent type of plasticizer onto a spread tow of synthetic thermoplastic filaments as described above. It also may be accomplished by use of a filament strand in which at least some of the filaments contain sufficient plasticizer to be softened at slightly elevated temperatures.
(2) That the filament bonds be formed by coalescence of the surface solvation type. In other words, no material should be employed for adhering the filaments which would coat, destroy or otherwise substantially interfere with the integrity of the wheat flour particles. Obviously no plasticizer should be employed which has a solvent or softening action on the flour particles. Bonds formed by coalescence of the surface solvation type also may be attained through the use of filaments spun with a suitable plasticizer content.
(3) That substantially all the flour particles be carried on the surfaces of the filaments, supported by the filaments, and substantially immobile with respect thereto. This structure is best accomplished by softening of portions of the filament surfaces whereby the particles may be slightly embedded therein without being coated or covered. It is also most easily accomplished when the diameters of the particles are not too different from the diameters of the filaments, the major portion of the particles being, for instance, less than twice the filament diameter, but more than one-tenth of the filament diameter.
1. A tobacco smoke filtering element made up of a bundle of co-extensive filaments in which all of the filaments are generally longitudinally oriented in said bundle, the filaments making up the bundle being characterized in that said filaments:
a. Comprise approximately 12,000 filaments of cellulose acetate having an acetyl content of 39.2% and a denier of 5 per filament;
I]. Are continuous filaments having about 8 crimps per inch;
c. Carry a content of plasticizer from the group consisting of di(methoxyethybphthalate or methylphthalylethylglycolate and also a content of wheat flour of 325 mesh bound to said filaments by means of said plasticizer so as to resist sitting out;
said bundle being characterized in that certain of the coextensive filaments by means of the plasticizer are coalesced to other co-extensive filaments within the bundle at randomly spaced intervals to give a filter element having the approximate composition by weight of 61% cellulose acetate, 25% flour and 14% plasticizer, said filter being pervious along its longitudinal axis.
2. A tobacco smoke filtering element made up of a bundle of co-extensive filaments in which. all of the filaments are generally longitudinally oriented in said bundle, the filaments making up the bundle being characterized in that said filaments:
a. Are of cellulose acetate;
b. Arc of crimped continuous filaments;
c. Carry a content of plasticizer and finely-divided wheat flour particles in which at least of the particles are of a diameter less than the diameter of the filaments, said fiour being bound to said plasticizer so as to resist sifting out;
said bundie being characterized in that certain of the coextensive filaments within the bundle are coalesced to other coextensive filaments at randomly spaced intervals, said filter being pervious along its longitudinal axis.
3. A tobacco smoke filtering element made up of a bundle of co-extensive filaments in which all of the filaments are generally longitudinally oriented in said bundle,
1 8 the filaments making up the bundle being characterized coextensive filaments at randomly spaced intervals, said I in that said filaments: filter being pervious along its longitudinal axis.
Ar of ll l s et References Cited in the file of this patent b. Are of crimped continuous filaments; 5 c. Carry a plasticizer and 530% by Weight of line UNITED STATES PATENTS ly-divided Wheat flour of particle size within the range 13091529 Pettlbo'ne June 9, '1931 f 200400 mesh; 1,845,264 Grunauer Feb. .16, 19.32. 2,331,830 Garber Oct. 12, 1943 said bundle being characterized in that certain of the 7 ath op et al- Mar. 27, 1945 coextensive filaments by means of the plasticizer are co- 2,664,374 Slayter et a1. Dec. 29, 1953 alescecl to other coextensive filaments within the bundle 2,688,380 MacHenry Sept. 7, 1954 at randomly spaced intervals, said filter being pervious 2,707,3 8 Taylor et a1. May 3, 1955 along its longitudinal axis. 2,739,913 Lieser Mar. 27, 1956 4. A tobacco smoke filtering element made up of a 2,751,320 Jac bs et a1. June 19, 1956 bundle of co-extensive filaments in which all of the fila- 2,763,267 Muller Sept. 18, 1956 ments are generally longitudinally oriented in said bundle, 2,774,630 aC Y 1 19 6 the filaments making up the bundle being characterized 2,780,228 Touey Feb. 5, 1957 in that said filaments: 2,789,563 Taylor et al. Apr. 23, 1957 a. Are of thermoplastic filaments which are con- 20 FOREIGN PATENTS .tinuous and crimped; 189,399 Switzerland May 1, 1937 b. Carrya content of plasticizer and of finely-divided 289,058 SWitZerlfind June 16, 1953 Wheat fiour attached to said filaments in a manner 440,316 Great Brit in Dec. 24, 1935 whereby the flour resists sifting out; 538,529 Gmat Bf 1ta 1n Aug 1941 653,666 Great Britain May 23, 1951 said bundle being characterized in that certain of the 665,278 Great Britain Jan. 23, 1952 coextensive filaments Within the bundle coalesced to other 1,101,035 France Apr. 13, 1955 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No. 2,917 ,054 December 15, 1959 George P0 Touey It is hereby certified that error appears in the printed specification of the above numbered patent requiring correction and that the said Letters Patent should read as corrected below.
Column 3, line 59, for "corresponding" read compressedcolumn 7, line 27, for "bundle coalesced" read bundle are coalesced Signed and sealed this 21st day of June 1960 (SEAL) Attest:
KARL H. AX ROBERT C. WATSON Attesting Officer Commissioner of Patents
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US1809529 *||Jan 9, 1929||Jun 9, 1931||Walter G Pettibone||Process and means for filtering and cooling the smoke of tobacco pipes|
|US1845264 *||Mar 17, 1930||Feb 16, 1932||Grunauer Bernhard P||Smoking device|
|US2331830 *||Apr 13, 1943||Oct 12, 1943||Larus And Brother Company Inc||Tobacco|
|US2372437 *||Jun 26, 1943||Mar 27, 1945||Claude R Wickard||Filter medium|
|US2664374 *||Sep 14, 1951||Dec 29, 1953||Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp||Process for fabricating strands, cords, tubes, and the like|
|US2688380 *||Jul 13, 1951||Sep 7, 1954||American Viscose Corp||Filter cartridge|
|US2707308 *||Dec 6, 1949||May 3, 1955||British Celanese||Method of making a filter element|
|US2739913 *||Jul 2, 1953||Mar 27, 1956||Philip Morris And Co Ltd Inc||Tobacco product and method of making said product|
|US2751320 *||Feb 16, 1953||Jun 19, 1956||Taylor Fibre Co||Method of continuous production of rods, tubes, and the like|
|US2763267 *||Nov 18, 1952||Sep 18, 1956||Adolf Muller Paul||Smoke filter of fibrous material, especially for tobacco products|
|US2774680 *||Jul 6, 1954||Dec 18, 1956||Darkis Frederick R||Process for making aerosol filters|
|US2780228 *||Mar 3, 1954||Feb 5, 1957||Eastman Kodak Co||Filters for tobacco smoke comprising cellulose esters and ethers|
|US2789563 *||Feb 24, 1954||Apr 23, 1957||British Celanese||Filter elements|
|CH189399A *||Title not available|
|CH289058A *||Title not available|
|FR1101035A *||Title not available|
|GB440316A *||Title not available|
|GB538529A *||Title not available|
|GB653666A *||Title not available|
|GB665278A *||Title not available|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3354013 *||Nov 26, 1963||Nov 21, 1967||Eastman Kodak Co||Method and apparatus for applying particulate additives to continuous filament tow|
|US4038992 *||Sep 29, 1975||Aug 2, 1977||The Japan Tobacco & Salt Public Corporation||Granular composition for tobacco filter|
|US4500315 *||Nov 8, 1982||Feb 19, 1985||Personal Products Company||Superthin absorbent product|
|US4537590 *||Jun 20, 1983||Aug 27, 1985||Personal Products Company||Superthin absorbent product|
|US4540454 *||Sep 10, 1984||Sep 10, 1985||Personal Products Company||Method of forming a superthin absorbent product|
|US5720832 *||Jun 6, 1995||Feb 24, 1998||Kimberly-Clark Ltd.||Method of making a meltblown nonwoven web containing absorbent particles|
|US5817159 *||Dec 31, 1996||Oct 6, 1998||Cahill; Scott A.||Filter with interpenetrating polymer network that biodegrades|
|US5998500 *||Jun 23, 1998||Dec 7, 1999||Cahill; Scott A.||Method of making a filter with interpenetrating polymer network that biodegrades|
|US20050161055 *||May 15, 2002||Jul 28, 2005||Peter Rozim||Filter unit for filter-cigarettes and filter cigarettes|
|WO2003086117A1 *||May 15, 2002||Oct 23, 2003||Rozim Peter||Filter unit for filter-cigarettes and filter cigarettes|
|U.S. Classification||131/342, 131/345|
|International Classification||A24D3/00, A24D3/14, A24D3/06|
|Cooperative Classification||A24D3/06, A24D3/14|
|European Classification||A24D3/06, A24D3/14|