Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2941173 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJun 14, 1960
Filing dateSep 7, 1954
Priority dateSep 7, 1954
Publication numberUS 2941173 A, US 2941173A, US-A-2941173, US2941173 A, US2941173A
InventorsRaphael Gollub
Original AssigneeC G S Lab Inc
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Controllable inductor
US 2941173 A
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

June 14, 1960 R. GOLLUB CONTROLLABLE INDUCTOR Filed Sept. '7, 1954 DISCRIMINATOR AND RECTIFIER OSCILLATOR CURRENT SOURCE CONTROLLABLE TANK CIRCUIT R.F. AMPLIFIER OUTPUT CIRCUIT INVENTOR RAPHAEL GOLL ATTORNEYS R.F.AMPLIFIER INPUT CIRCUIT CONTROLLABLE INDUCTOR Raphael Gollub, Stamford, Conn., assignor to C.G.S.

The present invention relates to electrical control apparatus and more particularly to electrically controllable inductors.

The present invention is described as embodied in a remotely controllable radio receiver system of a type utilizing a controllable inductor to regulate the frequency to which the radio is tuned.

An advantage of the radio control system described is that it is well adapted for use with superheterodyne receivers and enables remote control of the tuning of the radio frequency and oscillator circuits in such a receiver while providing automatic tracking 'of the tuning frequencies of these circuits.

Among the advantages of the apparatus described are those resulting from the fact that the controllable inductor used provides improved control characteristics and enables tuning over a wide frequency range. Controllable inductors customarily include a control Winding wound on a magnetically saturable core with a signal winding wound on a portion of the core so that changes in the degree of magnetic saturation of the core regulate the inductance of the signal winding which is connected into a circuit to be controlled. A control current is passed through the control winding in order to control the magnetic saturation of the core. As the control current is increased themagnetic saturation of the core increases, reducing the permeability of the material associated with the signal winding and hence reducing its inductance. When the control current is reduced, the inductance of the signal winding increases.

In present day controllable inductors one. of the ,problems encountered is that the core material retains a substantial degree of residual magnetism in the absence of any control current, thus preventing the inductance of the signal winding from rising to as high a value as could be obtained if the core material became fully unsaturated. Considerable eiforts have been .made in the past in order to neutralize this residual magnetism and thus obtain wider ranges of inductance change. I have found that a substantial reduction inthe residual flux and an improvement in the control characteristics of controllable inductors is obtained by the use of non-magnetic shims located in the path of the co'ntrolfiux! In the controllable inductor described, .a plurality of separate signal windings each with its own individual signal core portion are all controlled bythe same control winding on a common control yoke. In this inductor non-magnetic electrically conductive shims are sandwiched between each side of all the signal core and the control yoke.

- Other aspects and advantages of the present invention will be understood from the following description of a remote control receiver incorporating the invention and adapted for installation in an automobile, when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which: g

Figure his a diagrammatic view of an automobile portions showing the arrangement of a radio receiver embodying the present invention;

Figure 2 is an enlarged front view of the steering wheel showing the controls for the radio mounted in the center of the steering wheel;

Figure 3 shows, partly diagrammatically and partly in perspective, an electrically-controllable inductor which forms part of the auto radio receiver shown in Figure 1, the shielding structure being omitted to show the construction;

Figure 4 is an elevational view of the inductor of Figure 3, the control winding being shown diagrammatically and in section; and

Figure '5 is an enlarged view of one of the three variable-inductance signal circuits of the inductor of Figure 3.

The automobile radio receiver shown in the drawings is divided into a number of separate components with plugs and sockets at convenient points in the system. The receiver chassis 10, which is located in a convenient place in the automobile, for example in the rear trunk as shown in Figure 1 includes all of the circuit elements, except the antenna 12, the loudspeaker 14, and the remote control circuits, which are shown in Figure l and which are described in detail and claimed in my copending divisional application Serial No. 544,155, filed October 14, 1955.

As shown in Figure 2, controls for the radio are positioned on the hub of the steering wheel. These include a manual station selector 16, which may be adjusted by the driver to tune the receiver to various stations, a combined on-oif switch and volume control 18, a tone con-. trol 2i), and an automatic station selector push-button switch 22. Momentary closure of switch 22 causes the receiver to tune itself to a radio station on an adjacent frequency. A foot switch 23 near the drivers position controls the receiver in the same manner asthe switch 22. The connections from the controls on the steering wheel extend down inside of the steering column 24.

In the receiver chassis 10 is a radio frequency amplifier input circuit and output circuit (Figure 3), an oscillator circuit, discriminator and rectifier. circuits, and a controllable current source. Also included are inter.- mediate frequency, detector, and audio outputcircuits as described in said divisional application. A frequency control network is provided to stabilize the oscillator 'and is connected to a control amplifier, as described-in said divisional application, so as to tune .automatically the radio frequency circuits. by regulating the control-current through a winding 37. An automatic carrier-seeking control is provided so that whenever the con-trol button 22 or 23 is depressed the receiver will automatically tune to another station. 1 p

In order remotely to control receiver 10, an electricallycontrollable inductor is provided having three radiofrequency control circuits A, B, and C, with the control winding 37 associated therewith 'for regulating their inductances in accordance with the position of the station selector 16. p v

In one embodiment of the present invention, the com trollable inductor circuits A, B, and C- (seealso Figures 3, 4, and 5) include ferrite'core portions; 40, 42,.and 44 respectively, with signal windings 46, 48 and 50 wound thereon. The core portions 40, 42, and 44 are bridged across between the legs of a U-shaped magnetic in the ends of the laminations.

3 the degree of magnetic saturation of signal core portions 40, 42, and 44.

As shown in detail in Figure 5, each of the signal core portions, for example the core portion 42 comprises two elongated bars of ferrite or ferromagnetic ceramic placed" longitudinally adjacent one another. This ferrite material may be similar to that disclosed by Snoek in US. Patents Nos. 2,452,529; 2,452,530; and 2,452,531. A generally elongated hexagonal signal winding opening 56 is formed by trapezoidal recesses in the adjoining sides of the two bars. The signal winding 48 associated with core 42 is in two halves extending through the opening 56 and connected in series, so that their magnetic fields are in aiding relationship around the opening 56 to induce flux flowing around opening 56, as indicated by arrows 53. Whereas, the control flux, in flowing between the legs 54-1 and 54-2, follows paths extending substantially the full length of the core 42 as indicated by the arrows 59 so that the control and signal flux fields are not mutually coupled. The signal flux 58 is alternating in direction, while the control flux 59 may be a generally unidirectional flux whose value is varied only as necessary to regulate the degree of magnetic saturation of the core 42 and particularly the saturation of the edges of core 42 adjacent the hole 56 on which the two halves of winding 48 are wound. The permeability of the ferrite material in the core 42 decreases rather strikingly with an increase in the degree of its magnetic saturation produced by the control flux 59, and thus the inductance in the control circuit B is changed in accordance with the control current in winding 37. Similarly, the inductance in control circuits A and C is controlled by the control current in winding 37, because their cores 40 and 44 are bridged across between the yoke legs 54-1 and 54-2 and are subjected to the substantially same degree of saturation as core 42. Thus, the inductance values of windings 46, 48, and 50 track each other.

In order to reduce substantially any residual magnetism in control core 52 or in signal cores 40, 42, and 44 when the control current in winding 37 is decreased, it is advantageous to use non-magnetic shims 60 to space the ends of the signal cores slightly from the legs 54-1 and 54-2. These shims also provide further magnetic isolation between cores 40, 42, and 44, and legs 54-1 and 54-2 and acts to confine the signal flux 58 to the signal cores. To be most eifective in reducing residual magnetism the shims 60 should be at least mils thick. The shims adjacent the sides of the legs 54-1 and 54-2 are preferably considerably thicker than the shims between the ends of these legs and the core 40. In the receiver shown the two shims at the ends of the legs 54-1 and 54-2 are 10 mils thick and those adjacent the sides of the legs are 30 mils thick. The reason for the thinner shims at the ends of the legs 54-1 and 54-2 is that the end core 40 receives less of the control flux than the cores 42 and 44 because it is further from the control winding 37. Also, the core 40 is adjacent the ends of the laminations and so does not have as good magnetic coupling because of any slight irregularities This ratio in the thickness of the respective shims 60 may be varied where the dimensions of the control and signal cores are changed or a difierent lamination arrangement is used. If added shielding efiect is desired, the shims 60 may be electrically conductive, further preventing any signal flux from entering the control core 52. I find that shims 60 which are of brass 30 and 10 mils thick, respectively, are well suited for a radio receiver as shown, providing reduction in residual magnetism and giving suitable isolation of the signal and control cores, as well as providing optimum control of the inductance in circuits A, B, and C by the control current.

In the receiver shown the control core 52 comprised attack of 13 l'aminationsof cold rolled carbon steel,

for example such as SAE 1010 with a No. 4 temper and maximum Rockwell hardness B65. The laminations are .030 thick making a total stack of .390 inch. The lam-inations are 1% inches wide and 2 inches long. The legs 54-1 and 54-2 are .312 inch wide, with a 1 inch spacing between them, and the back of the core 52 is inch wide. The control winding 37 comprises two bobbins of 20,000 turns each of No. 40 enameled wire connected in series, making a total of 40,000 turns. Each of the signal cores 40, 42, and'44 comprise two rods of ferrite, each /s inch square in crosssection and about 1 inches long, so as to overlap the core legs by slightly more than inch at each side. The shims 60' are slightly larger than the area of the signal cores in contact with the control core. The signal cores may more fully overlap the legs of the control core, as shown in the drawings, when longer rods of ferrite are used, but I find the particular dimensions described quite satisfactory.

The hexagonal opening 56 in the signal cores 42, and 44 is about /3 inch long, the thin portions of the signalc-ores are about inch long, and the cross-sections of these thin portions are by A3 inch. The signal windings 46, 48, and 51 each have a total of 1 20 turns of 7/40 Litz wire, 60 turns being wound around each side of the openings 56. The antenna may be coupled to the core 43 by a winding 73 having about 3' turns through the opening 56 in the core 40.

For best operation the core portion 413 for the input to the RF. stage 26 is usually placed across the e'ndsof legs 54-1 and '54-2 as isolating it more completely from the oscillator circuit, with the cores 42 and 44 being bridged across the sides of these legs. A shield of elec' 'trically-conductive material 6 1 is fitted between the core 40 and the cores 42 and 44, and an outer parabolic shield 62 is spaced from and curved around the outside of cores 40, 42, and 44. It is soldered to the edges of shield 61 as shown in Figure 4. i i

The radio-frequency control circuit A is includedin the tuned circuit in the input of the radio frequency amplifier, and control circuit C is included in the tuned circuit in the output of this R.-F. amplifier. Control circuit B is in the oscillator tank circuit. The control current in winding 37 regulates the inductance of the circuits A, B, and C and hence controls the frequency to which the receiver 10 is tuned. l

The incoming radio signals picked up on the antenna 12 are coupled from a primary winding 73 (see Figure 3) on the core 40 to the winding '46 forming a secondary winding and into the tuned R.-F. input circuit. The primary and secondary windings 73 and 46, resp ectively, on the core 40 form an antenna coupling t ra'nsfr yrniei having certain advantages discussed hereatter.

For purposes of explanation, it is assumed that the receiver 10 is a broadcast receiver tunable throilgh a range from 530 to 1650 kilocycles, or in other word s, a frequency range of somewhat more than 3 to 1. To tune through this range the inductance values in circuits -A 'and B must change by a ratio of approximately 10 to -1.

This is well within the available range of inductance variations obtainable .by using apparatus as shown in Figures 3, 4, and 5; this apparatus can readily produce inductance changes of to 1 and often produces insignal windlato-r is arranged to oscillate at a frequency 455 kc. above the carrier signal. Thus, in tuning through the broadcast range the oscillator frequency changes from approximately 985 kc. to 2105 kc., or in other words, a range of something more than 2 to l, requiring an inductance change of about 5 to 1. As mentioned above, both circuits A and B must be vaiied over an inductance range of approximately 10 to 1. The inductancev in circuit B also varies over a range of' 10 to 1, but'b yusing ,lems.

the pair of padding inductance windings inseries and parallel therewith, respectively, the total effectivechange in the inductance of the resonant tank circuit is adjusted to the required range of aboutto l, as explained in greater detail in said"divisional application. By using the proper values for these padding inductances, the frequency of the oscillator is caused to track? 455 kc. above the frequency to which the tuned input and output circuits'of the R.F. amplifier are adjusted. Y

The inductance of the circuits A, B, and C' is varie and precisely controlled at any desired value, for tuning to various stations, by regulating the control current through the control winding '37 so as to tune the resonant frequency of the R.-F. amplifier and the oscillator frequency as mentioned above. Advantageously, in the circuit shown the frequency of the oscillator is' controlled by circuit B and this frequency, is monitored by circuits including the discriminating and rectifying circuit. The inductance of circuits A and C are forced to follow'or track with the value of circuit B, which is sensed and controlled as desired, and thus circuit B acts as the bell wether for the station. selecting circuits as 'a whole.

Among the important advantages of the remote station selecting control circuits described, is that the frequency of the oscillator 'is'continually'sensed or measured by the discriminator and rectifier circuit. Any changes in the oscillator frequency for any reason, cause a different signal to be fed to the controllable current source, thus changing the current through the control winding means 37 to bring the oscillator frequency back to the desired frequency. Moreover, the station selecting circuits are made substantially independent of any tendency toward hysteresis effect in the controlled inductance Values in circuits A, B, andC, for the control circuits operate in such away that any given settingof the station selection control 16'always corresponds to a given frequency of the oscillator. Thus, regardless of from which direction the tuning knob 16 is tuned toward a given position, as it reaches that position the operation of forces the inductance in circuits A, B, and C to change to the proper value to tune the receiver to the frequency corresponding with that position on the dial 16. The magnitude of the control current automatically adjusts itself to overcome any tendency toward magnetic hysteresis in the control flux.

Among the advantages of the circuit described are that they provided remote control of the receiver; that they eliminate all moving parts; and that they provide a receiver of longer life and one which is more rugged in operation because of the elimination of the moving parts.

There are certain important fundamental differences in the operation of a receiver wherein the condenser values are fixed and the inductance values are changed from the operation of an ordinary receiver in which the inductance values are fixed and the condensers are changed invalue. Some of these differences are not at all apparent and are rather surprising in their results, as will be pointed out in the following description. In the ordinary superheterodyne receiver in order to increase the frequency, the capacitance is decreased while the inductance remains constant. Thus, as the frequency is increased, the impedance of the resonant circuits involved is increased due to the fixed inductances involved. The increase in impedance tends to cause regeneration prob- Moreover, it decreases the effective gain at the higher frequencies because of the presence of shunt or stray capacities to ground which are present in any circuit. Also, the losses in the fixed inductances increase, so that the Q drops and, thus, the band-width drops.

In contrast to this, in the present circuit with increasing frequency the effective impedance of the tuned circuits preferably remains constant. In addition, due to the decrease in inductance (which also means a decrease in various losses in the inductance) there is a corresponding increase in the Q of the circuits being used. The

resultis that the effective'bandwidth of the receiver is constant over the full range'of reception,; and more-- over the effective gain of the 'receiver'isconstant because the impedance remains constant withincreasing frequency. i

The reason that'the band-width is constant is that it is proportional to the ratio of the frequency and Q. That is: BWaF/Q. As the frequency rises, the Q is correspondingly increased so that the ratio remains approximately constant,and hence the band-widthis approximately constant throughout the full range of operation of the receiver. i

Another advantage of the control circuit is that it is not the absolute values of the inductances which'are important in the operation, but rather their normalized values, that is, the ratio of the incremental inductance at any point to the incremental inductance when the control current is zero. This is particularly helpful in the antenna circuit because it enables the use of a wide variety of antennas, the only requirement being that the total volume and shape of the antenna loop winding 73 be maintained the same. Thus, any configuration of antenna. may be used and will produce results superior to those in the ordinary receivers used today. Although the present receiver'is described as tunable overa range from 530 to 1650 kc., the inductance values of the control circuits A, B, and C are capable of variations over ranges of 100 tol or even 200 to 1. Thus, it is apparent that the controllable inductor of the present invention is capable of usefor tuning a receiver over a-far wider range than is done today with mechanically variable condensers. a 1 a As described in greater detail in said divisional application, all of the connections to -the receiverchassis 710 are made through three sockets; an antenna lead-in socket 251! (Figure 1), a loudspeaker outlet 252, and a control and power socket 254. The antenna is mounted on the automobile near the receiver chassis 10; for example, it may be fastened on the rear bumper or on the rear of the car near the top of the trunk, as shown in Figure 1, with its lead-in wire adapted to be plugged into the socket 250. The loudspeaker 14 is located remotely from the chassis 10; for example, under a grill in the rear window ledge with its leads 256 plugged into the socket 252.

A seven-wire control and power cable 260 extends between a plug which connects in the receiver socket 254 and a socket 262 which engages a plug 280 adjacent the steering post 24 and the floorboard I To permit control of the radio from the rear seat, a branch cable 264 extends from the cable 260 to a socket 266, secured to the back of the front seat, so that an extension control unit 268 can be plugged into it when desired.

Also, a socket 270 may be provided under the floorboards near the driver's position into which is plugged a lead from the automatic station changing foot switch 23.

The power for the receiver is supplied by the automobile battery through a lead passing to the ignition switch and then to the socket 262. The leads from the controls on the steering wheel pass down inside of the steering column 24 some going directly to the plug 280.

From the foregoing description it will be understood that the present invention provides an electrically controllable inductor having many advantages as discussed above, and it is understood that the controllable inductor described can be adapted to a wide variety of different applications and that various changes or modifications may be made therein, each as may be best suited to the particular application desired and that the scope of the present invention is intended to include such modifications or adaptations, as defined by the following claims limited only by the prior art.

What is claimed is:

1. A controllable inductor comprising a generally U- shaped control yoke with a. pair of spaced legs, a first car br d e-r1 e ess between he ides said has a' second. si nal: o e ridg d a ro s. b tween h e ds f sai ess, ea h gna cqreincl vns a H m ter ev i elongated in a direction generally toward said legs and diyiding each. si n care. in o a pa r-Qt oppos d e portion 11 ig al win ing w u d n a h f a d, signal co es, ach signalw nd ng includingmr-ns wo nd; t r ug the. opening and around the. opp ed; edge portions of; its respective signal; core, a pair of non-magnetic electricallyoonductiveshims at least 30, mils thick between each of said legs and said first signal core, and a pair of nonmagnetic electrically-conductive; shims at least 10, mils thick between the ends of said legs and said second signal core. a w v a a 2. Any electrically controllable inductor having a controt winding, control core means defining part of a control flux path, said control winding being wound around said core means and electromagneticallycoupled to said control flux path whereby current in said control winding produces control flux changes in said control flux path, a plurality of" signal core means defining individual signal flux paths, said signal core means being spaced dit- -ferent distances front said control winding, said signal core means being at least partially included in said (5011- tho flux path and each including saturable magnet-ic material, a plurality of signal windings, each ofsaid signal windings "being; wound around a portion of a respective one of saidsignal core means and electromagnetically coupled to one ofsaid signal flux paths, and a'plurality of non-magnetic shims positioned between each ofsaid signal core means and said control core means, the shims bet-ween the control core means and the signal core means spaced more remote from said control 'wfiinding being th nner.

A 1 electri all aware iat rqtt malad es. 99nl saf 1 ans a ae a vm tr f 12=9?F 1 n d inin a fi a, 'q trq 1w? Phi tten in h r h ou h, tween a d, ace e on a nt ol, indin e g electronema ical ou dv to, a nt a path whereby current in said control winding. produces co t o flu ha es n a cgntrol fl Pat a u a t of signal core means extending between said two, spaced regions and being spaced different distances from said controlv winding, each of said signal core means defining an opening therein and defining an individual-signal flux path x n in a ou d th op ning, i i a co mean at least partially completing said control flux path b etween said; spaced regions and including saturable magnetic material, a plurality of signal windings at least one being on each of said signal core means passing through the respective openings thereof, and a plurality; of non: magnetic shims between each of said signal core means and the spaced regions of said control core means, the shims between the more, remote signal flux paths and the control core, means being thinner.

Rsfsreqsss C ed n the fi e o isv Patent U I -no STATE-S PATENTS

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1918683 *Dec 23, 1930Jul 18, 1933Aull Jr WilsonRemotely controlled radioreceiver
US2068320 *Nov 9, 1935Jan 19, 1937Bell Telephone Labor IncInductance device
US2241912 *May 4, 1938May 13, 1941Siemens AgArrangement for coil winding with magnetizable cores
US2302893 *Sep 29, 1939Nov 24, 1942Rca CorpVariable inductance arrangement
US2326737 *May 24, 1939Aug 17, 1943Andrews Edward FRadio receiver
US2462423 *Sep 27, 1944Feb 22, 1949Polydoroff Wladimir JFerromagnetic variable highfrequency inductor
US2507320 *Mar 16, 1948May 9, 1950John Riordan EdwardAlternating current electrical instrument and electromagnet therefor
AU148315B * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5339362 *Jan 7, 1992Aug 16, 1994Rockford CorporationAutomotive audio system
US5546273 *May 23, 1994Aug 13, 1996Rockford CorporationAutomotive audio system
US6956952Nov 17, 1999Oct 18, 2005P.B. Clarke & Assoc.Remote control interface for replacement vehicle stereos
US7020289Apr 21, 2000Mar 28, 2006P. B. Clarke & AssociatesRemote control interface for replacement vehicle stereos
US7613308Jul 13, 2005Nov 3, 2009Aamp Of AmericaRemote control interface for replacement vehicle stereos
US7684570Jun 14, 2002Mar 23, 2010Aamp Of AmericaVehicle remote control interface for controlling multiple electronic devices
US8014540Oct 26, 2009Sep 6, 2011Aamp Of AmericaRemote control interface for replacement vehicle stereos
US8184825Feb 2, 2010May 22, 2012Aamp Of Florida, Inc.Vehicle remote control interface for controlling multiple electronic devices
US8284950May 1, 2006Oct 9, 2012Aamp Of Florida, Inc.Vehicle remote control interface for controlling multiple electronic devices
US8289120 *Dec 3, 2010Oct 16, 2012Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaElectronic component, vehicle and electronic apparatus
US20110199176 *Dec 3, 2010Aug 18, 2011Koji TadaElectronic component, vehicle and electronic apparatus
Classifications
U.S. Classification336/155, 336/165, 455/152.1, 336/110, 455/345, 336/134
International ClassificationH03J1/00, H03J1/18
Cooperative ClassificationH03J1/185
European ClassificationH03J1/18C