Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2952499 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateSep 13, 1960
Filing dateNov 18, 1957
Priority dateNov 18, 1957
Publication numberUS 2952499 A, US 2952499A, US-A-2952499, US2952499 A, US2952499A
InventorsLeslie Carson George
Original AssigneePhilco Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Processing system
US 2952499 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Sept. 13, 1960 G. L. CARSON PROCESSING SYSTEM Filed Nov. 18, 1957 INVENTOR. ZZJY/f C 141?] 0 BY W 3 .M

United States Patent 2,952,499 Patented Sept. 13, 1960 ice PROCESSING SYSTEM George Leslie Qarson, Philadelphia, Pa., assignor to Philco Corporation, Philadelphia, Pa, a corporation of Pennsylvania Filed Nov. 18, 1957, Ser. No. 696,992

11 Claims. (Cl. 316-1) This invention relates to improvements in photosensitive devices and especially to a method for improving the performance of photomultiplier tubes.

Photomultiplier tubes have become widely used in various diverse applications and apparatus, such as devices for the detection of nuclear radiation, flying spot scanners for deriving signals from still or motion picture transparencies for television transmission, colorimetry, and certain types of color television reproducing systems employing the so-called photo-indexing principle. Typical of the latter is the system disclosed in the W. E. Bradley, et al., Patent No. 2,749,449 issued June 5, 1956. In these and other applications photomultiplier tubes are very useful because they are extremely sensitive, because they cost less than many other competitive types of radiation-sensitive devices, and because they have a relatively long useful life.

In essence, a photomultiplier tube is a device having a radiation-sensitive photocathode constructed of a material which emits free electrons in response to a particular form of incident radiation, such as visible, infrared or ultraviolet light. These emitted electrons are attracted from the photocathode by an electrode known as a dynode to Which a potential is applied which is more positive than that applied to the cathode. The dynode has a secondary emission ratio greater than 1, so that for every primary electron incident thereupon several secondary electrons are liberated therefrom. These secondary electrons are attracted, in turn, to a series of even more positive dynodes which respectively release progressively greater numbers of secondary electrons in response thereto. The secondary electrons emitted from the last dynode are collected by an anode and the resulting total current is passed to external circuitry for utilization. Although the structure of commercially available photomultiplier tubes may take several forms, it usually comprises one or more insulating supporting members on, or between which, the dynodes and other electrodes are mounted by means of supporting rods, lugs, or similar structures.

The performance of photomultiplier tubes is somewhat impaired by certain types of noise which is defined herein as comprising unwanted variable amplitude signals. This noise may be divided into two main types, i.e., so-called noise-in-signal and dark current noise. Noise-in-signal, which arises out of the inherent statistical nature of the photoelectric emission phenomenon, occurs only when radiation is incident on the photocathode and is similar to shot noise in thermionic vacuum tubes.

Dark current noise, on the other hand, refers to noise which occurs in the absence of any incident radiation because of the generation of electrical currents within the tube which reach the anode. It is essentially random in nature and arises from a variety of causes, i.e., thermionic emission by the photocathode and dynodes at room temperature, bombardment of dynode surfaces by particles of residual gases which have been ionized by electrons flowing through the tube, scintillations caused by electron bombardment of the secondarily emissive material of the dynodes, charging of the glass envelope of the device by an associated metallic shield, and ohmic leakage currents which reach the anode via a path across the insulators on which the various electrodes: of the tube are mounted. I have discovered that by far the largest constituent of dark current noise in most types of commercially available photomultiplier tubes is ohmic leakage current which, at room temperature, may constitute from about 50%95% of the total dark current.

Dark current is a factor which limits the operation of the tube in many of its applications, especially in cases where the incident radiation is of low intensity and the ratio of dark current to the total noise accordingly is high. For example, in scintillation counters the level of incident radiation which causes scintillations is extremely low and the total light emitted from the scintillating material is therefore extremely small, so that dark current is the chief source of the total tube noise. Unless the photomultiplier tube of the scintillation counter has good sensitivity it will be difiicult for the user to distinguish between the information-significant component of the indication which is due to the incident radiation and the component of the indication which is due to dark current.

In other applications, also, the reduction of the dark current component of the total noise is also highly desirable. For example, in single beam color television reproducing tubes of the previously mentioned photo-index type, when the scanning beam has low intensity and scans the elements which serve to index the position of the beam, the amplitude of the radiation produced is very small, and under certain conditions of receiver adjustment could be overriden by the dark current component of the total noise of the photomultiplier tube. The resulting loss of indexing signals would then cause the indexing system to misfunction with a consequent degradation of the color fidelity of the reproduced image.

Previous methods of reducing the leakage factor in dark current noise involved attempts to improve the nonconductivity of the insulating material of the electrodesupporting members, or spacing the high voltage electrodes as far away from the low voltage electrodes as possible so that there would be a longer and consequently higher resistance path between them. These attacks on the problem have been only partly successful since, even if the insulating material is of very high quality, a film of cesium may nevertheless become deposited upon the insulator by vaporization of the photocathode material thereupon during manufacture or thereafter. This film, though microscopically thin, acts to provide aresistive path connecting high and low voltage electrodes which is far more conductive than the material of the supporting member itself. Moreover, these thin films of cesium are unstable and cause fluctuations in the leakage currents.

It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a method for improving the performance of photomultiplier tubes.

Another object of the invention is to provide a method of reducing noise in the operation of photomultiplier tubes.

Still another object of the invention is to improve the useful sensitivity of photomultiplier tubes.

Another object of the invention is to provide a method for reducing dark current in photomultiplier tubes.

These objects, as well as others which will appear are achieved according to my invention by applying, in the absence of radiation to which the photocathode is sensi- *tive, an abnormally high voltage between the anode of the photomultiplier device and selected other electrodes thereof for a predetermined period, usually of the order of than that on dynode 16a.

several minutes. At the end of this period this voltage is removed from the device which is then preferably not put into operation for at least a period which may extend from several minutes to several days.

In one form of the invention the voltage is applied between the anode, on the one hand, and all the other electrodes on the other, beginning with a low value of voltage and gradually increasing to a maximum value which is somewhat lower than the value of voltage at which the device will arc-over. In this form, if a D.-C. voltage is used, the anode is connected to the negative terminal of the source, and the other electrodes are connected to the positive terminal thereof since, for a given processing time, the maximum voltage required is lower than if the anode and the other electrodes were connected oppositely.

Figure l is a schematic and sectional longitudinal view of a typical photomultiplier tube; and

Figure 2 is a cutaway perspective view of the anode reg-ion of such a tube.

Referring to Figures 1 and 2 a photomultiplier tube 11 of the so-called box type is shown. There are several other types of photomultiplier tubes and the invention will prove efiicacious with all of them, the box type being chosen merely for illustration. The structure and conventional operation of the tube will first be explained before considering its operation in the actual circuit of the processing system depicted. The tube 11 comprises an evacuated envelope 12 having a generally cylindrical form, one of whose ends 13 is transparent and coated on the interior surface with a photo-emissive material to form a photocathode 14. The photocathode 14 may be come posed of a cesium-antimony material Which possesses high efficiency and a long useful life. Radiant energy of the type which causes the cesium-antimony cathode to respond, such as visible light, passes through the transparent end 13 and-falls upon the photocathode 14. An aluminum coating 15 may be deposited on the inner surf-ace of the envelope 12 near the photocathode 14. This coating helps to prevent light from undesired sources from exciting the layer 14, helps to focus electrons, and also serves as a connection between a lead from a pin on the base of the tube (not shown) and the photocathode so that the latter may be connected to a source of potential. The photocathode '14, in response to the incident light, emits electrons which are attracted toward a first oversized dynode 16a to which a positive potential is apv plied in actual operation. The first dynode 16a and the subsequent dynodes 16b-16i, are shaped somewhat like longitudinal quarter-sections of a drum as shown in perspective in Fig. 2 and are mounted on supports 35 between two planar insulating supporting members a and 25b. Leads such as the lead 32 shown in Fig. 2, are connected between each dynode and a corresponding pin (not shown) on the base of the tube. The first dynode 16a may be made somewhat larger than the others in order to enhance the collection of photoelectrons emitted in various directions from the photocathode 14. A shield 19 may be placed intermediate dynode 16a and the photocathode l4 and may be connected, in actual operation, to a positive potential in order to obtain optimum collection and focus of the photoelectrons. This shield has the further function of preventing positive ions produced by the electrons passing between the various dynodes, from bombarding the cathode thereby causing emission of secondary electrons which would then be added to the total dynode current.

Assuming for purposes of illustration that the secondary emission ratio is 2:1, the incidence of each photoelectron upon the emissive material of the dynode 16a causes the emission of two secondarily-emitted electrons whose paths are represented by the broken lines 17 and 18 respectively. After the secondary electrons are emitted from the first dynode 1611 they are caused to impinge upon dynode 1611 by a positive potential applied thereto which is higher On striking dynode 16b they each, in turn, liberate two other secondary electrons which are attracted in similar fashion by a more positive potential applied to the dynode 160, from whence the electronmultiplication process continues in the same manner in the succeeding 'dynodes l6d16j until a greatly augmented current is collected by the anode 20 and supplied to a particular external utilization circuit (not shown). The last dynode 16 is shaped somewhat differently than the others and partially surrounds the anode 20 so as to insure that practically all of the secondary electrons from dynode ioi are collected.

Having explained the structure of tube 11 and its conventional operation, the processing of the tube for reduction of dark current in accordance with my invention will now be considered with special reference to Fig. 2.

Although the insulators 25a and 25b are themselves substantially non-conductive, there is deposited thereupon some of the cesium-antimony of which the photocathode 14 is composed thereby providing a high resistance path between electrodes at different potentials. The cesiumantimony deposits may develop on the planar insulators 25a and 25b as shown at numeral 40 in Fig. 2 in either of two ways, i.e., (l) by thermionic emission of the photocathode material at room temperature or, more often, (2) by the process employed in the deposition of the photocathode on the internal surface of the end of the tube 11. Because cesium-antimony is extremely oxidizable, it is not deposited on the interior surface of the end of the tube until all the air has been evacuated therefrom. Then the cesium-antimony, which has been deposited on a tungsten Wire in the vacuum, is evaporated by heating the wire by an electric current. In the evaporation process some of this photocathode material is inevitably deposited on the insulating supports 25a and 25b as shown at numeral 40.

In the normal operation of such tubes a relatively high potential difierence is applied between various elements thereof causing minute currents to flow along the surface of the insulating supports 25m and 25b to the anode proper, to the members which attach it to the insulating supports 25a and 25b, or to the lead connecting it to a pin on the tube base. These currents give rise to the dark current noise hereinbefore mentioned.

In accordance with one form of my invention the anode 20 is connected to the negative terminal of a power supply 30 which is preferably of the unregulated type and of high internal impedance. All the other electrodes, including the dynodes 16a16j, the photocathode 14, and the shield 19, are connected to the positive terminal of the power supply 30. A voltage nominally on the order of 2000 v. is then applied to the tube 11 in the absence of radiation to which its photocathode responds so that secondary emission current through the tube is negligible. At first, a very large leakage current will flow along the surface of the insulators 25a and 25b to the anode 20 and through the microammeter 31. Because of the poor regulation of the power supply 30 the applied voltage drops considerably below its nominal value and this has the advantage of limiting the initial surge of current to a safe value. Since this leakage current rapidly diminishes to a very small value, the voltage actually supplied by the power supply 30 increases until, at the end of about 4 to 6 minutes, it is at its nominal (or maximum) Value of about 2000 v., a value which is considerably below the arc-over voltage, a term which shall be considered herein to apply to that value of applied voltage at which one can first notice a rather abrupt increase in current accompanied by a visible discharge (if the tube is viewed in the dark) between adjacent electrodes at diiferent potentials or along the surface of the planar insulators 25a and 25b in the region between adjacent electrodes. From investigation of many different types of photomultiplier tubes I have found that the arc-over voltage is generally in the vicinity of 4500-5S0O v. depending on the particular tube structure involved.

The value of the voltage applied during the processing of the tube in accordance with my invention may be at least ten times the voltage customarily applied between the last dynode and the anode. In general, normal operating voltages are in the range 50100 v., although maximum voltages of about 150 v. are sometimes used when maximum amplification and sensitivity are desired.

Immediately after the end of the approximately 4-6 minute high voltage processing period the dark current as measured by the microammeter during normal operation will be relatively high and possibly may exceed the dark current which characterized the tube in normal operation before processing.

However, in accordance with another feature of my invention, I have found that if the tube is permitted to rest without the application of any voltage thereto for several minutes, the dark current in normal operation will be found to have decreased to a value somewhat lower than its value before the tube was processed. Furthermore, if the tube is permitted to rest for from about 24 to 72 hours it will be found that the normal dark current will be substantially lower than it was before the tube was processed. The period of time during which the tube is rested after processing is, of course, optional and depends to a certain extent on the desired degree of reduction of the dark current.

Although in the system shown in Fig. l the anode is connected to the negative terminal and the other electrodes are connected to the positive terminal of the power supply 30, it should be understood that the opposite connection will also produce satisfactory results but higher voltages may be required. In many tests, tubes with the anode connected to the positive power supply terminal and the other electrodes to the negative terminal thereof were processed for 4 to 6 minutes at voltages of 3000 to 3500 volts and produced the desired reduction in the leakage component of the dark current. With the anode negative, tubes could be processed during the same interval at voltages from 1800 to 2200 volts.

Instead of using a power supply with poor regulation it is, of course, possible to use a power supply having good regulation provided the supply first is adjusted so as initially to furnish a low voltage and then is adjusted to provide a higher voltage, as the dark current decreases, until the desired maximum voltage is attained. Alternatively, a power supply with an external series voltagedropping resistor may be utilized.

Repeated checks on tubes before and after processing have revealed no evidence of damage due to the application of a higher than normal voltage between the anode and the other electrodes. In fact, there is often an increase in the sensitivity of the dynodes ranging from possibly a few percent to fifty percent in some cases. This increase in sensitivity is probably due to the fact that the the material which has been vaporized from the supporting elements 25a and 25b by the processing, and which settles on the dynodes is fresher than the material previously deposited. Also, in some tubes, this material may have a higher secondary emission ratio than the original dynode material.

If desired, the process may be repeated several times on the same tube with a rest period being given to the tube after each processing. It will be noted that most of the reduction in the dark current will be evident after the first processing and that smaller reductions will be obtained in successive treatments. Tubes treated according to my invention have shown improvements in total dark current ranging from 15% to 94% without any concomitant harm to the tube and, in fact, often with an increase in overall sensitivity as noted previously.

Since the last dynode-anode region is usually the shortest resistance path in tubes such as the box type herein illustrated, it is often the path through which most of the leakage current flows. It therefore follows that a large part of the leakage current may be diminished if the high voltage is applied only between the last dynode (or last few dynodes) and the anodes. One can, of course, re duce leakage currents flowing between selected ones of the more distant dynodes (or other electrodes) and the anode if desired.

It will be understood that still other applications of the processes according to the diverse forms of my invention described herein will occur to those skilled in the art. Consequently, I desire the scope of this invention to be limited only by the following claims.

What I claim is:

1. In the processing of photomultiplier tubes, which tubes comprise at least a photocathode electrode, a plurality of dynode electrodes, a final electron collecting electrode, and insulating support structures therefor, a method of substantially decreasing the tubes dark current effect, said method comprising the steps of shielding said tube from incident radiation of wavelengths to which said photocathode electrode is principally responsive, and applying an abnormally high voltage between said final electron collecting electrode and at least selected ones of said other electrodes, said voltage being applied for a time sufiicient to effect a substantial decrease in the conductivity of deposits fortuitously precipitated on the surface of said insulating support structures during an earlier stage in the production of said tubes.

2. The method according to claim 1 wherein said applied voltage has a maximum value somewhat below the arc-over voltage of the tube.

3. The method of improving a photomultiplier tube having a final electron-collecting electrode and at least one secondarily-emissive electrode mounted on a common insulating member, comprising the steps of applying, in the absence of substantially all radiation to which the photocathode thereof principally responds, an abnormally high voltage between the final electron-collecting electrode and at least one selected other electrode thereof for a period of several minutes, and then removing all voltages from said tube for at least a predetermined interval.

4. The method according to claim 3 further characterized in that said final electron-collecting electrode is at a negative potential and said selected electrode is at a positive potential.

5. The method according to claim 3 wherein said voltage is initially applied at a first level and then is gradually raised to its maximum value.

6. The method according to claim 3 wherein said predetermined interval during which all voltages are removed from said tube is at least several minutes in duration.

7. The method according to claim 3 wherein said predetermined interval is at least twenty-four hours in duration.

8. The method of improving the performance of a photomultiplier tube comprising the step of applying an abnormally high voltage between the final electron-collecting electrode and selected ones of the other electrodes therein for a relatively short time in the absence of substantially all radiant energy to which the photocathode thereof is substantially responsive.

9. The method of improving the performance of a photomultiplier tube comprising the step of applying an abnormally high voltage having a value somewhat below the arc-over voltage of the tube between the final electron-collecting electrode and selected ones of the other electrodes therein for a relatively short time.

10. The method of improving the performance of a photomultiplier tube comprising the step of applying an abnormally high voltage between the final electron-collecting electrode and selected ones of the other electrodes therein for a relatively short time, said applied voltage having a value of at least ten times the potential nor- 7 mally applied between the final vdynode and the final electron-collecting electrode in conventional operation of said tube.

11. The method of improving the performance of a photomultiplier tube comprising the step of applying an abnormally high voltage between the final electron-collecting electrode and selected ones of the other electrodes therein for about 5:1 minutes.

References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS Thomson Sept. 19, James June 11, Helliar Ian. 7, Jenny Dec. 16, Gauthier Mar. 10,

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1927812 *Nov 27, 1931Sep 19, 1933Gen ElectricPhoto-electric tube
US2401734 *Oct 8, 1940Jun 11, 1946Rca CorpPhotoelectric electron multiplier
US2413707 *Jul 25, 1945Jan 7, 1947Cyril HelliarApparatus for reactivating radio tubes
US2622218 *Jan 31, 1950Dec 16, 1952Rca CorpSecondary-emission electron discharge device
US2877078 *Apr 13, 1954Mar 10, 1959Du Mont Allen B Lab IncMethod of treating phototubes
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3275878 *Feb 27, 1963Sep 27, 1966Tektronix IncLead-in seal for evacuated envelope of an electron discharge device for connecting electrodes located within said envelope to a voltage source positioned outside said envelope
US3736038 *Mar 26, 1971May 29, 1973Mitsubishi Kenki KkSpot-knocking method for electronic tubes
US4341427 *Jun 30, 1980Jul 27, 1982Rca CorporationMethod for stabilizing the anode sensitivity of a photomultiplier tube
US4355258 *Dec 16, 1980Oct 19, 1982Rca CorporationPhotomultiplier tube having a stress isolation cage assembly
US4415832 *Nov 20, 1981Nov 15, 1983Rca CorporationElectron multiplier having an improved planar utlimate dynode and planar anode structure for a photomultiplier tube
US4588922 *Mar 19, 1984May 13, 1986Rca CorporationElectron discharge device having a thermionic electron control plate
US5446275 *May 19, 1993Aug 29, 1995Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.Electron multiplying device having multiple dynode stages encased by a housing
EP0571201A1 *May 19, 1993Nov 24, 1993Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.Electron multiplying device
U.S. Classification445/5, 445/6, 313/317
International ClassificationH01J43/28, H01J43/00
Cooperative ClassificationH01J43/28
European ClassificationH01J43/28