|Publication number||US2970106 A|
|Publication date||Jan 31, 1961|
|Filing date||Jan 31, 1958|
|Priority date||Jan 31, 1958|
|Publication number||US 2970106 A, US 2970106A, US-A-2970106, US2970106 A, US2970106A|
|Inventors||Robert C Binning, Jr Walker F Johnston|
|Original Assignee||American Oil Co|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (3), Referenced by (60), Classifications (13)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Jam 31, 1961 R. c. BINNING ETAL ARoMATIc SEPARATION PRocEss Filed Jan. 3l, 1958 Jan. 31, 1961 c. BINNING ETAL AROMATIC SEPARATION PROCESS Filed Jan. 3l, 1958 Permegled Part/0n 2 sheets-sheet V:a
FEED CHAMBER Roberf C. Bin/:ing Walker l-T ./o/msfo/l, Jr.
,gy/@afl ATTORNEY nited States Patent() 2,970,106 AROMATIC SEPARATION PROCESS Robert C.' Binning, Texas City, and Walker F. Johnston, Jr., La Marque, Tex., assignors to The American Oil Company, Texas City, Tex., a corporation of Texas Filed Jan. 31, 1958, Ser. No. 712,450 12 Claims. (Cl. 208-347) This invention relates to the separation of aromatic hydrocarbons from mixtures thereof with other hydrocarbons, and particularly concerns the separation of aromatics from hydrocarbon distillates.
An object of the present invention is to provide a proc the invention will be apparent from the detailed description thereof.
The present invention utilizes the discovery that when a hydrocarbon distillate is charged to a permeation step and permeated and nonpermeated portions are recovered, the permeated portion is not only enriched in aromatics but also has a markedly different composition with respect to other component hydrocarbons. Because of the change in composition, the permeated portion can be dis- .tilled into a high boiling fraction even richer in aromatics and a low boiling fraction poorer in aromatics than the total permeated portion. The non-permeated fraction can similarly be distilled to produce a high boiling fraction rich in aromatics and a low boiling fraction poor in aromatics. Unless the permeation step precedes the distillationstep, it is not possible to obtain this effect of highly concentrating the aromatic hydrocarbon.
In accordance with the present invention a hydrocarbon distillate charge which has a definite boiling range and contains aromatic and other hydrocarbons is subjected to a permeation step. In this step the charge distillate is contacted with one side of a plastic -permeation membrane which preferentially permeates aromatic hydrocarbons. A portion of the charge mixture is permeated through the membrane and from the opposite side of the membrane is recovered the permeated portion having a higher concentration of aromatic hydrocarbons than is present in the charge distillate. The non-permeated portion of the charge has a lower concentration of aromatics than is present in the charge distillate. The permeated portion is then distilled to separate a lower boiling fraction from a higher boiling fraction. The higher boiling has a higher concentration of aromatics than was present in the permeatedportion passed to the distillation step, and the lower boiling fraction from the distillation step has a lower concentration of aromatics than was present in the permeated portion passed to the distillation step. The non-permeated portion may similarly be subjected to a distillation step to separate a lower boiling fraction from a higher boiling fraction. The higher boiling frac tion will likewise have a higher concentration of aromatics and the lower boiling fraction will have a lower concentration of aromatics than the concentration of aroice matics in the non-permeated portion passed to the distillation step. When the charge distillate to the process is a naphtha such as a reformed naphtha or a catalytically cracked naphtha, the present invention provides a technique for segregating the naphtha into various high octane and low octane fractions. The high boiling fraction of the permeated portion of the naphtha charge will be very rich in aromatics and will have a very high octane number. The low boiling fraction of the permeated portion of the charge naphtha may be recycled to the permeation step. The high boiling fraction of the nonpermeated portion of the naphtha charge may likewise be recycled to the permeation step, and the low boiling fraction of the non-permeated portion of the naphtha will be very low in aromatics and is discarded from the process. Various naphtha fractions, e.g. a toluene-xylene fraction, may be charged to the process of this invention to produce select high octane and low octane fractions. A narrow boiling naphtha distillate, such as is rich in aromatic hydrocarbons having a specific number of carbon atoms per molecule, e.g. a toluene fraction or a xylene fraction, may be processed by this invention to produce the substantially pure aromatic hydrocarbon.
Rather than carry out the distillation of the permeated portion in a separate vessel, the permeation process may be operated so as to perform a distillation function. In this aspect of the invention the charge distillate is introduced in the liquid phase into the charge: zone of the permeation vessel. A portion of the charge distillate is permeated through the membrane into the permeate zone (the latter is separated from the charge zone by the permeation membrane) and as the permeating distillate passes into the permeate zone, conditions of temperature and pressure are maintained therein such as to cause the permeated portion of the distillate to remain partly in the liquid state and partly in the vapor state. The higher boiling liquid portion of the permeated distillate will have a higher concentration of aromatics than is present in the vaporous portion of the permeated distillate, and it would also be higher than the concentration of aromatics in the distillate charged to the permeation step.
Figure 1 illustrates an embodiment of the present invention for segregating a naphtha fraction into component fractions of high and low octane numbers. This schematic diagram depicts a method for .recovering a substantial yield of 108.6 F-l clear octane (extrapolated) naphtha.
In this embodiment volumes of naphtha (100 volumes is chosen here since percentages are easily determinable therefrom, but this may represent typical flows of 10,00020,000 bbls./day) is passed by way of line 11 to a naphtha hydroforming operation indicated herein by block 12. This naphtha charged to the hydroforming operation will generally have an octane number of 40-60 -l clear and will usually boil over the range of about to 400 F. Any of the naphtha hydroforming processes may be used. Processes which employ a supported platinum catalyst such as platinum on alumina are preferred since they produce the maximum yields of highest octane naphtha of the various commercial naphtha hydroforming processes. In the hydroforming process the naphta is contacted with the catalyst in the presence of hydrogen at a temperature in the range of about 850 to 1000 F., a pressure in the range of about 50 to 800 p.s.i.g., advantageously about 200-400 p.s.i.g. Hydrogen is employed in the amount of about 1,000 to 10,000 cu. ft./bbl. of naphtha charge. Space velocities of from 0.1 to 5 WHSV may be used. In the embodiment shown herein the Ultraforming process, which is a relatively low pressure regenerative catalyst process, is used to produce a stabilized C5 to 400 F.
Vhydroforniate having a 99.9 F-l clear octane number.
The hydroformate is produced in 81% yield based upon naphtha charge and has an aromatics content of 69%.
The C400 hydroforrnate consisting of 8,1 volumes is passed by way of line 13 into fractionator- 14 wherein it is split into two fractions. A lower boiling fraction containing benzene and lower boiling hydrocarbons is taken overhead by way of line 16. The higher boiling fraction which contains toluene and higher boiling hydrocarbons is removed from the bottom of fractionator 14 by way of line 17. A cut point of 190 F. or thereabouts may be used in fractionator 14. The overhead fraction removed by way of line 16 may boil over theA range of about 70 to 190 F. It comprisesV 19.4 volumes and contains only 6% aromatics. Because of its low octane number it is not a suitable stock for blending to make high octane gasoline. The bottoms from fractionator14 is' passed by way of line 17 into fractionator 18 wherein itissplit into an overhead toluene-xylene fraction and a bottoms fraction containing C9 and higher aromatics.' Fractionator 1S may be operated at a cut point of 280 F. or thereabouts. The overhead fraction is removed by way of line 19. It boils over the range of about 190-280 F. and constitutes 21.1 volumes. Its aromatic content is 72%. Because its aromatic content can be increased and its octane number improved in a practical fashion, it is employed as the charge stock to the permeation-distillation process of this invention. The bottoms from fractionator 18 is removed by way of line 21. It boils over the range of about 280-400" F. and consists of 40.5 volumes. This fraction has an aromatics content of 98% and has a very high octane number making it exceedingly suitable for blending to produce very high octane gasolines.
In its fundamental form a permeation vessel consists of an enclosed vessel separated into two chambers or zones by the permeation membrane. The charge mixture to be processed is introduced into one chamber wherein it contacts one side of the permeation membrane. The permeation membrane is a thin plastic film through which aromatic hydrocarbons permeate at a more rapid rate than do the other hydrocarbons contained in the distillate charged to the permeation vessel. Examples of permeation membranes are films of cellulose esters, cellulose ethers, blends of cellulose esters and cellulose ethers and other cellulose derivatives. The cellulose derivatives may be modified by reacting the free hydroxyl groups contrained therein with an organic reagent such as aldehydes, aldehyde-alcohol mixtures, organic diisocyanates, organic monoisocyanates, organicphosphorous halides, or. by a sequence of modifications such as modification with an aldehyde followed by modification with an organic diiso- Various modified cellulose ester and/or ether derivatives are set out in Martin et a1. S.N. 687,284. Films of copolymers of Vinyl chloride and vinylidene chloride maybe used. Synthetic rubber-type membranes may also be employed. Because the aromatic hydrocarbon is more soluble in the permeation membrane than are the aliphatic and cycloaliphatic hydrocarbons, the aromatic hydrocarbons permeate through the membrane at a greater rate and thus'the permeated portion of the charge mixture has a higher concentration of aromatics than does the charge mixture or the nonpermeated portion of the charge mixture. Best results can be obtained by using a permeation membrane which has the highest selectivity for permeating aromatics in preference to other hydrocarbons at the highest possible rates, but theV particular membrane used is not of critical importance so long as it performs the function of permeating aromatics in preference to other hydrocarbons. The permeation membrane employed should be as thin as possible and yet provide the required strength to withstand differential pressure across the permeation membrane which may be from 1 to 500 p.s.i.g. The membrane is a film usually less than m1ls in thickness and suitably may be from 0.1 t0 2 mils in thickness. I
avvenne Permeaton is a non-equilibrium process, .e. the concentration of the hydrocarbons in contact with the charge side of the permeation membrane must be higher than the concentration of the hydrocarbons in contact with the permeate side of the membrane, or otherwise permeation will not occur. Non-equilibrium conditions are usually provided for by rapidly withdrawing the permeated portion from Contact with the permeate side of the membrane.
As to the physical conditions employed during permeation,l
the hydrocarbon distillate introduced into the charge or feed zone may be in the liquid state, and the permeated portion may be removed from the opposite side 'of the membrane in the vapor or liquid state, prefreably in the vapor state; or the hydrocarbon distillate introduced into the feed zone may be in the vapor state and the permeated portion removed from the opposite side of the membrane also in the vapor state. Temperatures as high as the permeation membrane is capable of withstanding without rupturing due to thermal instability in the presence of the mixtures undergoing separation are generally employed,
since the rate of permeation increases substantially as the temperature of permeation is increased. The permeation membrane is usually supported by a porous backing rnaterial to assist it in withstanding the pressure differential between the feed and the permeate zones.
The toluene-xylene fraction of hydroformate is passed by way of line 19, together with certain streams which are recycled and which will be discussed in detail later, into the charge zone 21 of permeation vesselZZ. This stream is introduced at a temperature of about 250 F. and under suicient pressure to maintain it in the liquid state. yA
K modified cellulose acetate-butyrate membrane, denoted here as 23, of 0.5 mil thickness is used. The charge hy drocarbon distillate remains in charge zone 21 until ap-I proximately half of it has permeated through the membrane into permeate zone 24 which is maintained at a pressure of 25 mm. Hg abs. The first increment of the permeated distillate will have the greatest enrichment of aromatics, and subsequent increments of permeated distillate will have somewhat lower aromatic concentrations. The particular percentage of the charge distillate which is permeated through the membrane can be Varied betweenabout 5% or even less up to about 75% or even more, depending upon the concentration of the aromatics in the charge distillate and the concentration of aromatics desired in the permeated portion. In this embodiment the 50% of the charge distillate which is permeated through the membrane exists in permeate zone 24 in the vapor state and is rapidly withdrawn therefrom to maintain nonequilibrium conditions in the permeation vessel 22.
Thepermeated portion comprises 21.1 volumes and has an aromatics concentration of 87.5%. It is compressed and liquefied and passed by way of line 26 into fractionator 27. The permeated distillate charge to fractionator 27 is split therein into an overhead low`boiling fraction and a bottoms high boiling fraction. The aromatics are present in a higher concentration in the bottoms fraction than in the overhead fraction. In carrying out this splitting operation, the greater the percentage of the charge to the fractionatorwhich is taken overhead, the higher will be the concentra-tion of aromatics in the bottoms fraction. As the percentage of the bottoms fraction is increased and the percentage of the overhead fraction is decreased the concentration of the aromatics in the bottoms fraction will gradually diminish but will at all times be higher than the concentration of aromatics in the permeated distillate sent to the fractionator. Therefore the splitting operating carried out in fractionator 2'7 maybe adjusted to produce a bottomsfraction consisting of from 5 to 95% of the permeated distillate charged to the fractionator, the particular percentage of bottoms depending upon the concentration of aromatics desired in the bottoms fraction and the concentration of aromatics in the permeated distillate charged to the fractionator. In this embodiment 71.4 volumesof the permeated distillate are assegna taken overhead from fractionator 27. This'overhead frac-` tion contains 72% aromatics, line 28 into line 19 by which it is recycled as part of the charge to permeation vessel 22. The bottoms fraction, which comprises 13.7 volumes, contains somewhat more than 96% aromatics. It is removed from fractionator 27 and passed by way of line 29 to line 21. This bottoms fraction is thereafter blended with the 280400 F. fraction of the hydroformate to produce 54.2 volumes of hydroformate containing 98% aromatics and having an octane number of 108.6 F-l clear. By use of the present invention it is possible to produce higher yields of a given octane number hydroformate than by hydroforming the naphtha at a severity sutlicient to produce the designated octane number. To illustrate, naphtha can be hydroformed under high severity conditions and then fractionated to` recover a higher boiling portion having this same octane number of 108.6 F-l clear,` but the yield based upon naphtha charged to the hydroformer is only 51.2 volume percent whereas by use of the present invention the yield is 54.2 volume percent based upon naphtha charged to the hydroformer. The present invention also segregates portions of the hydroforrnate having low aromatic contents which may be further processed to increase their octane number and then blended into the 108.6 F-l clear naphtha. p d Referring to permeationvessel 22, the non-permeatted portion of the hydroformate is withdrawn therefrom and passed by way of valved line 31 into the charge zone 32 of a second permeation stage depicted here as permeation vessel 33. This stream comprises 21.1 volumes and contains 53% aromatics. The permeation conditions employed in this second permeation stage are the same as those described for the first permeation stage carried out in permeation vessel 22, except that approximately twothirds of the charge to permeation vessel 33 is permeated rather than 50% as in permeation vessel 22. The portion of the charge mixture which permeates through the membrane 34 into permeate zone 36 is removed rapidly therefrom, liquied, and passed by way of line 37 into line 19 by which it isrecycled as a portion of the charge to the first permeation stage depicted here as permeation vessel 22. This permeated portion which is recycled consists of 13.7 volumes and has an aromatics content of 72%. The non-permeated portion withdrawn from permeation vessel 33 consists of 7.4 volumes and has an aromatics content of 17.7%. It is passed by way of line 38 to line 16 wherein it is blended with the C5-l90" F. fraction of reformate. Blending of these streams produces 26.8 volumes of hydroformate having an -aromatics content of 9.2%. This low octane blend can be hydroformed to improve its octane number, or portions of the blend can be isomerized or otherwise processed to improve the octane number. While approximately two-thirds of the charge to the second permeation stage was permeated, the amount which is permeated can be varied between about 5% or less up to 75% or even more, depending upon the degree of enrichment in aromatics concentration desired in the permeated portion. i In place of the second permeation stage, the non-permeated portion of the hydroformate from the first permeation stage can be subjected to distillation to separate it into lower and higher boiling fractions. The higher boiland it is passed by way of ing fraction will have a higher concentration of aromaticsA than the charge to the distillation step, and the lower boiling fraction will have a lower concentration of aromatics than the charge to the distillation step. In this embodiment the non-permeated portion of hydroformate from permeation vessel 22 may be passed byway of valved lineA 39 into distillation tower 41. d The splitting operation may be adjusted to produce a bottoms stream containing about 72% aromatics and an overhead streamjcontaining a` lower concentration of aromatics than is present `in `the charge stream in line 39. The bottoms stream maybe passed by way of line 42 to line 19 by which it is returned to permeation vessel 22. The overhead stream is removed by way of line 43 and may be blended with the C5-190 F. fraction of hydroformate. If desired, the distillation tower 41 may be operated so as to remove from 5% or less up to 95% or more overhead. The greater the percentage of the charge which is removed overhead, the `higher will be the concentration of aromatics in the bottoms fraction. The operation and functioning of distillation tower 41 is thus similar to distillation tower 27.
Distillation towers 27 and 41 need not be highly eflicient fractionating units as a general rule. Because of this, a distillation effect can be obtained by operating permeation vessel 22 under conditions of temperature and pressure so that a portion of the permeate exists.` in the liquid state and a portion exists in the vapor state. Each of the portions are separately and rapidly withdrawn from permeate zone 24 to prevent the permeation process from reaching equilibrium on opposite sides of the membrane. At a given permeation operating temperature, the pressure in permeate zone 24 may be increased to cause increasing amounts of permeated distillate to exist in the liquid state in permeate zone 24. By suitable adjustment of the pressure the permeate can be split into a vapor portion comprising between 5 and 95% of the permeate and a liquid portion and thus achieve an eifect similar to the use of a distillation tower. If desired, permeation vessel 33 of this embodiment may be operated in this manner to obtain a fractionating effect upon the permeate. It is obvious that a number of permeation stages followed by one or more distillation stages, or a number of consecutive permeation and distillation steps can be arranged in practising this invention.`
While the illustrated embodiment of the invention employs a specific fraction of hydroformate as the charge distillate to the invention, it is obvious that 'the total hydrofcrmate or "dierent fractions thereof may be so processed. Similarly, other naphtha such as catalytic naphtha or fractions thereof, virgin naphtha, thermally cracked naphtha, etc. may be processed to segregate high octane fractions from low octane fractions or to recover substantially pure aromatic fractions. Hydrocarbon distillates boiling above the naphtha hoiling'range may also be processed to produce fractions having increased concentrations of aromatics. Thus fuel oil fractions such as kerosene, gas oils, catalytic cycle oils and the like may be employed as the hydrocarbon distillate charge to this invention to segregate such distillates into fractions of higher and lower aromatics content. Such stocks are thereby improved for use as fuel oils or as cracking stocks and at the same time high aromatics fractions usefulfor other purposes `are recovered. Hydrocarbon distillates boiling up to about GOO-700 F. may be employed in this invention. Besides petroleum distillates, hydrocarbon distil- Iates obtained from the refining of coal tar, shale oil, hydrogenation of coal or coke, etc. may be processed to recover the aromatics therefrom.
Illustrative of the invention are certain experiments which were carried out. A hydroformed naphtha was fractionated to recover a ZOO-400 F. fraction containing about aromatics. This fraction was segregated by a combination of permeation and distillation into a fraction containing aromatics (70 volume percent yield)`andA a fraction containing 51% aromatics (30 volume percent yield). This latter fraction was then charged to a permeation vessel and approximately one-half of it was per` permeation apparatus employed in the experiments. It` consisted of a box-like feed chamber 51lforrthe` charge distillate introduced therein: a smaller size-membraneI holder 52 of box-like shape having tive open faces across which the permeation membranes 53 are sealed, the sixth face having sealed thereto a line 54 for removing the portion of the distillate which permeates through the membranes into the interior (permeate zone 56) of the membrane holder. The entire membrane holder was positioned within feed chamber 51. Pump 57 passed the charge mixture (which had been heated to the desired permeation operating temperature) through line 58 into feed chamber 51 until the liquid level of the charge mixture was substantially above membrane holder 52. The permeated portion was continuously withdrawn from permeate zone 56 through line 54 by means of vacuum pump 59. Manometer 61 and pressure regulating valve 62 were used to measure and regulate the pressure in permeate zone 56. The total surface area provided by the membranes was approximately 22 sq. in.y In the permeation experiments the distillate charged to the feed charnber Vwas maintained at a temperature of about 250 F. while employing pressure sucient to maintain distillate in the liquid state in the feed chamber. The permeate zone was maintained at about 25 mm. Hg abs.
The permeation membrane used in the experiments was a modified cellulose acetate-butyrate membrane. It was prepared by dissolving 30 gm. of cellulose-butyrate (AB- S04-40), which had 1.00 free hydroxyl groups per anhydroglucose molecule, 0.50 acetyl groupand 1.5 butyryl groups per anhydroglucose molecule, in 320 ml. dioxane and heating to about 135 F. Three ml. of concentrated HCl diluted to 10 ml. with dioxane was added followed by the addition of 19.5 gm. of 2-ethylhexaldehyde dissolved in 50 ml. of dioxane. The reaction mixture was then heated at 135 F. for one hour. Thereafter it was diluted with 300. ml. of ethanol, and then a 610-40 ethanol-water mixture was added to cause the cellulosic polymer to precipitate from the solution in the form of a gel. Excess liquid was removed from the gel and the latter was then air dried. 2.66 gm. of the air dried material was dissolved in 40 ml. of dry dioxane. Three drops of N-methylmorpholine and 0.055 gm. of 2,4-tolylene diisocyanate were added and the mixture was heated at 150 F. for 0.5 hour. Films of 0.5 mil thickness were cast from this solution onto steel panels and cured under heat lamps for about one hour. Thereafter the aldehyde-diisocyanate modilied cellulose ester films were removed and used.
Distillation of the permeated and non-permeated portions ofhydroformate revealed various fractions thereof to have the compositions shown in Table 1 and Table 2.
TABLE 1 Dstz'llaton of permeated hydroformate Overhead Fractions Bottoms Fractions Overhead Temp., F. Vol. Percent Vol. Percent Percent Aro- Percent ro- Overhead maticsin Bottoms matics in Overhead Bottoms Charge 100 77.2 226-230 19. 6 31. 4 80.4 88. 3 39. 56. 6 60. 5 90. 7 59. 5 65. 3 40. 5 94. 6 74. 5 70.6 25. 5 96. 4
TABLE 2 Distllazion of non-permeated portion of hydroformate Overhead Fractions Bottoms Fractions Overhead Temp., F. Vol. Percent Vol. Percent Percent Aro- Percent Aro- Overhead maticsin Bottoms matics in Overhead Bottoms Charna o loo aso 153-21() 20. 4 5. 2 79. 6 33. 7 210-244.. 40.9 12.8 59.1 38.3 2444277.. 61. 3 11.7 38. 7 53. 5 277-286 76. y 19. 7 23. 4 54. 6
The above tables show the bottom fractions to contain ever increasing concentrations of aromatics as larger amounts are taken overhead.
Y A heavy fraction of catalytic naphtha having an ASTM boiling range of 212340 F. 90% FBP and an octane number of 93.8 F-1 clear was employed as a charge distillate to a combination of permeation and distillation steps. A permeation operating temperature of 340 F. and a permeate pressure of 200 mm. Hg abs. were used. The permeation membranes were 0.3 mil thickness cellulose ace'tate-butyrate modified by reaction with formaldehyde and then tolylene diisocyanate. The same general procedure was employed in making these films as discussed previously except that the cellulose acetate-butyrate was AB381-0.5 which contained 1.0 acetyl group, 1.67 butyryl groups, and 0.33 free hydroxyl group per anhydroglucose unit. Both 5 and 15% portions of the heavy catalytic naphtha were permeated and thereafter distilled in a 15 tray Oldershaw column at a 10:1 reux ratio. Octane numbers (F-l clear) of the catalytic naphtha charged to the permeation vessel, the permeated portions, and the distilled permeated portions were determined and are reported in Table 3 which follows.
Illustrating the ability of the present invention to produce substantially pure aromatics fromy a mixture thereof with other hydrocarbons is the following experiment. A naphtha fraction boiling overthe range of 20S-232 F.' which contained 47.6 volume percent toluene, 3-4% olens and about 50% saturated hydrocarbons'was used as the charge distillate. An aldehyde-diisocyanate modified cellulose acetate-butyrate membrane of the type previously discussed was employed as the permeation membrane. The permeation temperature was 340 F. Charge distillate in the feed chamber was maintained in the liquid state. The permeate pressure was maintained at 400 mm. Hg abs. until about 32% of the charge distillate had permeated and it was then increased to 700 mm. Hg abs. As the hydrocarbons permeated through the membrane they were collected in six individual fractions. The cummulative volume of permeate and the cumulative concentration of toluene in the permeated fractionsfwas determined, as was also the concentration of toluene in the permeant fractions corresponding to the permeate fractions. This information is presented in Table 4 which follows.
TABLE 4 Permeaton of toluene cut Permeate Fractions Perrrieant Fractions Fraction Nos.
Collected Vol. Vol. Vol. Vol.
' Percent Percent Percent Percent Permeated Toluene Pcrmeant Toluene 0 100 47. 6 9. 9 63 9D. l 45. 9 18.6 5. 3 81.4 43.6 25. 2 65. 3 T4. 8 '41. 7 3l. 6 65. 2 68 4 39. 5 39. 5 64. 60. 5 37. 0 46. 9 62. 5 53. l i 34. 5
The permeate fractions collected were then combined (46.9 volume percent of the chargedistillate to the permeation vessel) and distilled in a 20 plate Oldershaw column at a :1 reflux ratio. 10% cuts were taken overhead, the cuts combined with the preceding cuts, and the concentration of toluene measured. The concentration of toluene in the remaining bottoms fraction after each cut was taken overhead, was also determined. These results are shown in Table 5 which follows.
TABLE 5 Dislillalon of 47% permeated toluene cuz Overhead Fractions Bottoms Fractions Overhead Temp., F. Vol. Percent Vol. Percent Percent Toluene Percent Toluene Orerin Over- Bottoms in head head Bottoms 0 100 62. 5 7. 6 90 69. 0 2D 9. 5 80 76. 2 30 12. 3 70 84. 5 40 17. 3 60 tls. 3 50 29. 3 50 Q6. 4 60 39. 2 40 98. 4 70 47.1 30 G9. 5 80 53. 6 20 100 .non-aromatics, separately recovering permeated and nonpermeated portions having higher and lower concentrations of aromatics respectively than the charge mixture, and distilling the permeated portion to separate a lower boiling fraction from a higher boiling fraction which higher boiling fraction has a higher concentration of aromatics than the permeated portion which is passed to the distillation step and a higher concentration of aromatics, than could be obtained by only distilling the distillate charge.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein the non-permeated portion is distilled to separate a lower boiling fraction from a higher boiling fraction, the latter fraction having a higher concentration of aromatics than the non-permeated portion passed to the distillation step.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein the charge mixture boils within the naphtha boiling range.
4. The process of claim l wherein the charge mixture is reformed naphtha.
5. The process of claim l wherein the charge mixture is catalytically cracked naphtha.
6. The process of claim 1 wherein the charge mixture is a narrow boiling distillate rich in aromatic hydrocarbons having a specic number of carbon atoms per molecule.
7. A process which comprises splitting a reformed naphtha into a benzene and lower boiling fraction, an intermediate toluene-xylene fraction, and a higher boiling fraction containing C9 and higher boiling aromatics, charging the intermediate toluene-xylene fraction in the liquid state to the first of a series of permeation vessels comprised of charge and permeate zones that are separated from each other by permeation membranes which preferentially permeate aromatics, permeating a portion of the charge mixture through the permeation membrane into the permeate zone from which it is rapidly removed in the vapor state, said permeated portion having a higher concentration of aromatics than is present in the charge to the rst permeation vessel and lower concentration of closely boiling non-aromatics, condensing the permeated portion and distilling it to separate a high octane higher boiling fraction from a lower boiling fraction, said Yhigher boilingfraction having a higher concentration of aromatics than is present in the lower boiling fraction and higher than the concentration o'f aromatics in the permeated portion passed to the distillation step and also higher than the concentration of aromatics which would be obtained from only distilling the intermediate toluene-xylene fraction, recycling said lower boiling portion as part of the charge to the tirst permeation vessel, charging the nonpermeated portion to a second permeation vessel and therein permeating a portion of the charge mixture through the permeation membrane, removing a nonpermeated portion of diminished aromatics concentration from the second permeation vessel, recovering a permeated portion from the second permeation vessel which has a higher concentration of aromatics than the charge to the second permeation vessel and recycling this permeated portion as part of the charge to the l'irst permeation vessel.
8. In a permeation process wherein a hydrocarbon distillate containing both aromatic and non-aromatic components is separated by permeation through a plastic permeation membrane which preferentially permeates aromatics and non-aromatics separable therefrom by distillation, the permeated portion comprising aromatics and reduced concentration of closely boiling non-aromatics, the improved operating technique which comprises maintaining a temperature and pressure on the permeated hydrocarbons downstream of the membrane for etecting vaporization of all non-aromatic? hydrocarbon permeate and liquefaction of substantially pure aromatics and thus effecting separation of said substantially pure aromatics by combined permeation and distillation.
9. A process for treating hydroformed naphtha, which process comprises distilling said hydroformed naphtha to obtain a high boiling stream consisting almost entirely of aromatics and a distillate stream containing a mixture of aromatics with other hydrocarbons, permeating a portion of the distillate stream through a non-porous plastic membrane to obtain a rst permeate which is higher in aromatics content and lower in closely boiling non-aromatics content than the original distillate stream, withdrawing a non-permeated portion, distilling the rst permeate to obtain a bottoms fraction consisting essentially of aromatic hydrocarbons and an overhead fraction tains a lower percentage of aromatics than the first permeate and combining said bottoms fraction with said high boiling stream.
10. The method of claim 9 which includes the step of passing the non-permeated portion from which rst permeate was separated through a second permeation zone and therein obtaining a second permeate and combining said second permeate with said distillate stream.
l1. The method of claim 9 which includes combining said overhead fraction with said distillate stream.
12. The method of claim 9 which includes the steps of combining the overhead fraction with the distillate stream and also combining with said distillate stream a second permeate obtained by permeation of the non-permeated portion separated from rst permeate.
References Cited in the tile of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,159,434 Frey May 23, 1939 FOREIGN PATENTS 681.434 Great Britain Oct. 22, 1952 493,803 Canada June 23. 1953 which con-
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2159434 *||Jun 27, 1936||May 23, 1939||Phillips Petroleum Co||Process for concentrating hydrocarbons|
|CA493803A *||Jun 23, 1953||Allied Chem & Dye Corp||Process for the recovery of aromatic hydrocarbons|
|GB681434A *||Title not available|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3250080 *||Nov 7, 1962||May 10, 1966||Kerr Mc Gee Oil Ind Inc||Method of separating gaseous mixtures by diffusion and fractionation|
|US3369343 *||Mar 1, 1966||Feb 20, 1968||Gen Electric||Structures and processes incorporating permeable membranes for the support of animallife during unfavorable conditions|
|US3754650 *||May 11, 1972||Aug 28, 1973||Molkerergenossenschaft Dahlenb||Method for the dialysis of milk, and more particularly method for producing albumin from milk and whey, and apparatus for carrying out this method|
|US4115465 *||May 26, 1977||Sep 19, 1978||Bayer Aktiengesellschaft||Separation of aromatic hydrocarbons from mixtures, using polyurethane membranes|
|US4368112 *||May 13, 1981||Jan 11, 1983||Exxon Research And Engineering Co.||Solvent recovery from foots oil using modified regenerated cellulose membranes|
|US4444571 *||Mar 7, 1983||Apr 24, 1984||Bend Research, Inc.||Energy-efficient process for the stripping of gases from liquids|
|US4493714 *||May 4, 1983||Jan 15, 1985||Teijin Limited||Ultrathin film, process for production thereof, and use thereof for concentrating a specified gas in a gaseous mixture|
|US4532029 *||Apr 27, 1984||Jul 30, 1985||Exxon Research And Engineering Co.||Aromatic solvent upgrading using membranes|
|US4571444 *||Apr 27, 1984||Feb 18, 1986||Exxon Research And Engineering Co.||Process for separating alkylaromatics from aromatic solvents and the separation of the alkylaromatic isomers using membranes|
|US4606903 *||Apr 27, 1984||Aug 19, 1986||Exxon Research And Engineering Co.||Membrane separation of uncoverted carbon fiber precursors from flux solvent and/or anti-solvent|
|US4639257 *||Jul 15, 1985||Jan 27, 1987||Costain Petrocarbon Limited||Recovery of carbon dioxide from gas mixture|
|US4772295 *||May 19, 1987||Sep 20, 1988||Nippon Kokan Kabushiki Kaisha||Method for recovering hydrocarbon vapor|
|US4797200 *||May 4, 1984||Jan 10, 1989||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Upgrading heavy oils by solvent dissolution and ultrafiltration|
|US4802987 *||Feb 24, 1984||Feb 7, 1989||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Selective permeation of aromatic hydrocarbons through polyethylene glycol impregnated regenerated cellulose or cellulose acetate membranes|
|US4828773 *||Oct 14, 1987||May 9, 1989||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Highly aromatic anisotropic polyurea/urethane membranes and their use for the separation of aromatics from non-aromatics|
|US4837054 *||Oct 14, 1987||Jun 6, 1989||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Thin film composite membrane prepared by deposition from a solution|
|US4861628 *||Oct 14, 1987||Aug 29, 1989||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Thin film composite membrane prepared by suspension deposition|
|US4879044 *||Feb 3, 1989||Nov 7, 1989||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Highly aromatic anisotropic polyurea/urethane membranes and their use for the separation of aromatics from non aromatics|
|US4885096 *||Jun 13, 1988||Dec 5, 1989||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Aromatics - non-armoatics separation by permeation through thermally crosslinked nitrile rubber membranes|
|US4892564 *||Mar 24, 1988||Jan 9, 1990||Cooley Thomas E||Membrane process for hydrocarbon liquid recovery|
|US4894068 *||Dec 27, 1988||Jan 16, 1990||Permea, Inc.||Process for capturing nitrogen from air using gas separation membranes|
|US4900402 *||Mar 25, 1987||Feb 13, 1990||Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe Gmbh||Pervaporation process of separating a liquid mixture|
|US4914064 *||Oct 14, 1987||Apr 3, 1990||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Highly aromatic polyurea/urethane membranes and their use for the separation of aromatics from non-aromatics|
|US4921611 *||Feb 9, 1989||May 1, 1990||Schucker Robert C||Thin film composite membrane prepared by deposition from a solution|
|US4962271 *||Dec 19, 1989||Oct 9, 1990||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Selective separation of multi-ring aromatic hydrocarbons from distillates by perstraction|
|US5006132 *||Jun 12, 1990||Apr 9, 1991||Air Products And Chemicals, Inc.||Membrane processed purified pipeline gas|
|US5055632 *||Dec 29, 1989||Oct 8, 1991||Exxon Research & Engineering Company||Highly aromatic polyurea/urethane membranes and their use for the separation of aromatics from non-aromatics|
|US5064446 *||May 26, 1988||Nov 12, 1991||Ube Industries, Ltd.||Method of preparing high purity light gas by multiple-step gas separation|
|US5085676 *||Dec 4, 1990||Feb 4, 1992||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Novel multicomponent fluid separation membranes|
|US5599380 *||Dec 18, 1995||Feb 4, 1997||L'air Liquide, S.A.||Polymeric membrane|
|US5759237 *||Jun 14, 1996||Jun 2, 1998||L'air Liquide Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et, L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude||Process and system for selective abatement of reactive gases and recovery of perfluorocompound gases|
|US5785741 *||Jun 14, 1996||Jul 28, 1998||L'air Liquide, Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges, Claude||Process and system for separation and recovery of perfluorocompound gases|
|US5814127 *||Dec 23, 1996||Sep 29, 1998||American Air Liquide Inc.||Process for recovering CF4 and C2 F6 from a gas|
|US5855647 *||May 15, 1997||Jan 5, 1999||American Air Liquide, Inc.||Process for recovering SF6 from a gas|
|US5858065 *||Jan 16, 1997||Jan 12, 1999||American Air Liquide||Process and system for separation and recovery of perfluorocompound gases|
|US5905182 *||Sep 23, 1997||May 18, 1999||Institut Francais Du Petrole||Process for the purification of benzene that comprises two permeation stages|
|US5919285 *||Apr 3, 1998||Jul 6, 1999||American Air Liquide, Inc.||Process and system for separation and recovery of perfluorocompound gases|
|US5968334 *||May 1, 1998||Oct 19, 1999||American Air Liquide Inc.||Process for recovering CF4 and C2 F6 from vent gases of an aluminum production cell|
|US6085549 *||Apr 8, 1998||Jul 11, 2000||Messer Griesheim Industries, Inc.||Membrane process for producing carbon dioxide|
|US6096114 *||Oct 30, 1998||Aug 1, 2000||American Air Liquide, Inc.||Process for recovering SF6 from a gas|
|US6128919 *||Sep 22, 1998||Oct 10, 2000||Messer Griesheim Industries, Inc.||Process for separating natural gas and carbon dioxide|
|US6187077||Apr 17, 1998||Feb 13, 2001||American Air Liquide Inc.||Separation of CF4 and C2F6 from a perfluorocompound mixture|
|US6214089 *||Jul 21, 1998||Apr 10, 2001||American Air Liquide, Inc.||Process and system for separation and recovery of perfluorocompound gases|
|US6224677||Jul 12, 1996||May 1, 2001||Teisan Kabushiki Kaisha||Gas recovery unit utilizing dual use of gas|
|US6254666||Mar 28, 2000||Jul 3, 2001||L'air Liquide, Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude||Process and system for separation and recovery of perfluorocompound gases|
|US6273937||Mar 29, 2000||Aug 14, 2001||Trans Ionics Corporation||Membrane pervaporation and vapor permeation system|
|US6312502 *||Apr 23, 1999||Nov 6, 2001||L'air Liquide, Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude||Process and system for separation and recovery of perfluorocompound gases|
|US6444011||Jan 25, 2001||Sep 3, 2002||American Air Liqide, Inc.||Process and system for separation and recovery of perfluorocompound gases|
|US6605133||Apr 23, 1999||Aug 12, 2003||L'air Liquide - Societe Anonyme A' Directoire Et Conseil De Surveillance Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude||Process and system for separation and recovery of perfluorocompound gases|
|US7642393||Oct 5, 2006||Jan 5, 2010||General Electric Company||Process for removing at least benzene from hydrocarbon streams|
|US7744727 *||Apr 24, 2004||Jun 29, 2010||2S-Sophisticated Systems Limited||Distillation method|
|US8258363 *||Sep 21, 2011||Sep 4, 2012||Phillips 66 Company||Separation of aromatics with pervaporation membrane|
|US20070131533 *||Apr 24, 2004||Jun 14, 2007||Blum Stephan R||Distillation method|
|US20080000836 *||Jun 30, 2006||Jan 3, 2008||Hua Wang||Transmix refining method|
|US20080086021 *||Oct 5, 2006||Apr 10, 2008||Hua Wang||Process for removing at least benzene from hydrocarbon streams|
|US20120074043 *||Sep 21, 2011||Mar 29, 2012||Conocophillips Company||Separation of aromatics with pervaporation membrane|
|EP0312375A2 *||Oct 14, 1988||Apr 19, 1989||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Highly aromatic polymer alloy membrane of polyurea and polyurethane and its use in aromatic/non-aromatic separations|
|EP0312376A2 *||Oct 14, 1988||Apr 19, 1989||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Polyurea membrane and its use for aromatics/non-aromatics separations|
|EP0343920A1 *||May 23, 1989||Nov 29, 1989||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Process for multistage catalytic reforming with interstage aromatics removals|
|WO2002078821A1 *||Mar 30, 2001||Oct 10, 2002||Trans Ionics Corporation||Membrane pervaporation and vapor permeation system|
|U.S. Classification||208/347, 210/640, 96/4, 203/71, 203/39, 208/308, 95/50, 585/819, 159/DIG.270|
|Cooperative Classification||C10G31/11, Y10S159/27|