Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2996455 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateAug 15, 1961
Filing dateDec 28, 1956
Priority dateDec 28, 1956
Publication numberUS 2996455 A, US 2996455A, US-A-2996455, US2996455 A, US2996455A
InventorsGlenn R Brown, Jones Arthur Letcher
Original AssigneeStandard Oil Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
High viscosity index, low viscosity, low volatility motor oil
US 2996455 A
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

tates This invention relates to oil compositions that are useful primarily as engine lubricating oils and are characterized by a unique and most desirable combination of high viscosity index, low viscosity at low temperatures and low volatility at higher temperatures.

The desirability of providing a lubricating oil having a high viscosity index, i.e., a low viscosity at low temperatures to facilitate cold starting and minimize friction and engine wear while operating at low temperatures and a high viscosity at higher temperatures to insure adequate lubrication and minimize friction and engine wear at engine operating temperatures, has been recognized for some time. The recent trend towards engines of higher horsepower and speed, and toward the use of closer tolerances between moving parts thereof have accentuated the demands for lubricants that will provide effective lubrication under a wide variety of conditions ranging from starting an engine at frigid temperatures to operating it at high speeds for extended periods of time and at average temperatures of several hundred F.

The answer of the oil industry to demands for oils to meet these requirements has been to provide the socalled double and triple branded motor oils. These are generally oils or oil blends containing at least about 8% and as much as 15% by volume of one or more high molecular weight polymers, e.g., polybutenes, well known in the industry as viscosity index improvers. It is possible, for example, to blend enough of a viscosity index improver with an oil having a viscosity index of say 100 to increase its viscosity index to 140 or more and thus make it eligible for classification as a triple branded motor oil such as SAE W-20.

As so often happens, however, this solution to the problem has brought with it several other problems which are of a magnitude suflicient to have resulted in a considerable decline in the popularity of such multi-branded oils. The new problems created by attempts to produce motor oil blends of high viscosity index through the strategy of blending considerable amounts of viscosity index improver with an oil are basically related to the fact that low viscosity at low temperatures goes hand in hand with high volatility at the temperatures to which a motor oil is subjected during engine operation. Blends of thin oil with high proportions of viscosity index improver to raise the viscosity at 210 F. to an acceptable figure were found to have comparatively short useful life in an engine. Investigations showed this to be due to the relatively high volatility at the operating temperature of the engine. Blends of thicker oil with the same amount of viscosity index improver had reduced volatility at the higher temperature and therefore better consumption characteristics, but were too viscous at low starting temperatures. The use of lesser amounts of viscosity improver with thicker oils can result in acceptable values of viscosity at starting temperatures and volatility at engine operating temperatures, but results in a reduction of viscosity at engine operating temperatures to a point that is inadequate for proper lubrication under the conditions of operation.

Thus it becomes apparent that attempts to blend oils and viscosity index improvers to obtain lubricating oils of optimum characteristics have been frustrated by the atent O i 5 2,996,455 Patented Aug. 15, 1961 "ice inescapable fact that at least one of three basic requirements, i.e., low viscosity at starting temperatures, high viscosity at operating temperatures and low volatility at operating temperatures must be sacrificed, or that, in the alternative, an unsatisfactory compromise must be accepted. In addition to this problem, it also developed that the high molecular weight viscosity index improvers tend to undergo shear breakdown under operating conditions when used in high or moderately high concentration. This breakdown is permanent in that the viscosity lost as a result of the breakdown is not regained after the oil has returned to ambient temperature.

The surprising discovery has now been made that an oil composition having all three desirable attributes of low low-temperature viscosity, high high-temperature viscosity (i.e., high viscosity index) and low volatility can be prepared by blending a maximum of 5% by Volurne of a high molecular weight viscosity index improver with an oil refined by thermal diffusion to increase the viscosity iudex thereof from the range of about to to the range of at least and preferably about to or more. It is also within the scope of the invention to blend with the viscosity index improver a blend of two or more oils that have been refined by thermal diffusion to increase their viscosity indexes.

The oil composition of the invention, therefore, essentially comprises a major amount, preferably at least about 80% by volume, of a thermal diffusion refined oil having a viscosity index of at least 110 and preferably between 115 and about 130 and up to about 5% by volume of a high molecular weight viscosity index improver. Compositions within the scope of this definition are characterized by a viscosity index of at least 140, a viscosity of less than 200 SSU at 100 F., a viscosity of at least about 50 SSU at 210 F. and a volatility at atmospheric pressure of less than 5% at about 735 F. and less than 50% at about 800 F.

High molecular weight viscosity index improvers are Well known in the lubrication art, as exemplified by the discussion thereof in Motor Oils and Engine Lubrication, by Carl W. Georgi, Reinhold Publishing Co. (1950), at pages 196 to 207. One is the Paratone viscosity index improver, a butene polymer believed to have the general formula for which the molecular weight is in the range of 10,000 to 15,000. Another is Acryloid, a polymer of methacrylic acid ester and higher fatty alcohols generally having a molecular weight Within the range of 5,000 to 20,000. An example is Acryloid 763 which has a specific gravity of 0.901, a viscosity of 7200 centistokes at 100 F., and a molecular weight, measured in terms of the centistoke viscosity at 100 F. of a 30% solution of the polymer in toluene, of 350 centistokes. A third type is the Santodex viscosity index improver prepared by copolymerization of styrene with olefins having eight to twelve carbon atoms and having the general formula are wherein R stands for an alkyl radical having eight to twelve carbon atoms and the molecular weight is of the same order as for the Paratone and Acryloid types.

' centistokes at 100 F.

Thermal diffusion as is now well known in the art, is a method that essentially involves applying a tem- 'perature gradient across a thin filmof liquid having dissimilar components, thereby separating the liquid into at least two different fractions, and then physically removing the fractions from one another. Inasmuch as this is usually accomplished in apparatus having two closely spaced walls forming a thermal diffusion chamber for confining the liquid while it is subjected to thermal diffusion and one of the walls is relatively heated and the other relatively cooled to impose the tempera- 'ture gradient across the confined liquid, one of the dissimilar fractions is referred to as the hot wall fraction to indicate that it is the fraction that has accumulated adjacent the hot wall and the other fraction is called the cold wall fraction for similar reasons. The degree of separation obtainable by means of thermal diffusion is dependent upon a considerable number of variables including the rate of throughput, the relative rates of withdrawal of the hot and cold wall fractions, the

magnitude of the temperature gradient imposed, the spacing between the hot and cold Wall surfaces, the area of said surfaces, and the like. y

In the method of the invention, it has been found that the hot wall fractions of oils subjected to thermal diffusion have remarkably increased viscosity index values and are not affected appreciably in so far as volatility is concerned. While the invention is not to be limited by any theory advanced, it is believed that the thermal diffusion process, when applied to hydrocarbon oils, involves a sorting out by molecular types rather than molecular weights and that the hot wall fractions are characterized by an enriched para'flinic content whereas the cold wall fractions tend to have a higher than initial concentration of aromatic constituents. The term thermal diifusion refined, as applied to oils and oil blends in this description, is therefore intended to refer to the hot wall fraction obtained by subjecting hydrocarbon oils to thermal diffusion.

The oil compositions of the invention have a considerable number of important advantages. Prominent among these are their low low-temperature viscosities for promoting easy starting, effective lubrication and reducing engine Wear at low temperatures, high high-temperature viscosity to promote adequate lubrication, minimize engine Wear and reduce friction at operating temperatures, and low volatility to insure adequate oil mileage. In addition, the oil compositions of the invention are viscosity stable in that they are spared the effects of shear breakdown and consequent permanent reduction in viscosity that is characteristic of the multibranded oils that have heretofore appeared and haveal- "ready lost favor in the market.

While the oil compositions of the invention are consider'ed useful primarily as motor lubricating oils, they have many other uses, e.g., as vacuum pump oils, transformer or switch oils, and in many cases where high temperature lubrication is required. The cold wall fractions obtained alongwith the'overhead products in the thermal diffusion process also have a variety of uses. They may be used in hydraulic systems and in applica tions requiring oils of high specific gravity.

The advantages and utility of the composition and method of the invention will become further apparent from the detailed description in the following example.

4 EXAMPLE Part A.Solvent extracted neutral oils having viscosities of 140 and 300 at F., and therefore identified as 140 SEN and 300 SEN oils, respectively, were refined by thermal diffusion in a six foot vertical, center feed concentric tube column wherein the thermal dififusion separation chamber was formed by the outer wall of the inner tube and the inner wall of the outer tube, the opposed surfaces of the chamber-forming walls being spaced apart a distance of 0.03". The hot wall was maintained at a temperature of 445 and the cold wall was maintained at F. The oils were introduced into the thermal diffusion columns at rates of approximately 35 nil/hr. and the rates of withdrawal of the hot wall fraction from the top and the cold wall fraction from the bottom were maintained approximately equal. The initial and final viscosities and viscosity indexes, and the 5 and 50% Engler distillation values, of the thermal diffused oils withdrawn from the top of the column are tabulated in Table I immediately below:

Part B.A lubricating oil composition was prepared by blending 61.5% SEN thermal diffusion refined oil (hot wall fraction), and 25.5% 300 SEN thermal diffusion refined oil (hot wall fraction). This blend has a 5% Engler volatility at 739 F. and a 50% Engler volatility at 803 F. To this was added 9% of a heavy oil known as 78 SEE (solvent extracted brightstock) having a viscosity index of 96 and viscosities of 725.8 and 75.0 SSU at 100 F. and 210 F., respectively, and 4% high molecular Weight polymeric viscosity index improver (2% Acryloid 763 and 2% of a Du Pont PL- 164B or LOA-565 as defined heretofore), the percentages being by volume. The viscos'ities and viscosity index of this oil composition are given in Table II.

Part C.-The oil composition thus prepared was compared with five commercial triple branded SAE 5W-20 oils identified anonymously herein as oils A, B, C, D and E. Oils A, B, C and D are prepared in accordance with the prevailing practice of blending about 8 to 15% by volume of polymeric viscosity index improver with a relatively thin base oil so as to obtain an oil composition of optimum viscosity characteristics at the expense of high volatility and high consumption. Oil E is an oil prepared by blending a thicker base oil with about 8 to 15 by volume of polymeric viscosity index improver in order to obtain a less volatile oil composition at the expense of high viscosity at low and starting temperatures.

In order to properly compare the five commercial oils with the oil of the example prepared in accordance with the invention, the viscosities at 0 F. and 300 F. were obtained by extrapolation from the measured viscosities at 100 and 210 F. Oil consumption figures were obtained by subjecting all of the oils in rotation to ordinary driving conditions in a fleet of automobiles and these figures were in effect checked by determinations of the temperatures at which 5 and 50% of the compositions were volatilized and also a determination of the percentage of lubricant remaining after subjecting a 0.15 min. film thereof to a temperature of 300 F. for two hours in a forced draft oven. The higher the residue remaining from this film test, the better the oil is with respect to engine wear and rate of oil consumption. The data from these tests is given in Table II.

Table II Oil Oomposition OilA OilB OilC OilD OilE of Parts AandB V.I 148.8 150.1 155.4 153.5 152.1 121.1 Measured Viscosity,


100]? 194.7 166.8 160.8 167.3 150.8 224.7 210]? 52.56 49.11 49.4 50.11 47. 46 50.37 Extrapolated Viscos- 'y,SSU:

F 4,300 3,900 3,200 3,300 3,100 10,800 300]? 38.8 37.3 37.6 38.1 36.9 37.2 Engler Volatility:

F-- 739 675 665 647 680 728 50% F 808 775 745 762 775 793 Thin Film Evaporation, Percent Lubricant Remaining--." 72 56.8 38.2 34.6 62.1 75.3 Average Oil Consumption, qts./1,000 miles 1.03 1.55 1.49 1.41 1.54 1.05

The data in this table shows that the viscosity, consumption and volatility characteristics of the oil of the invention could not be duplicated in any one of the five competitive oils tested. The volatility of the thermal difiusion refined oils before addition of the viscosity index improver is substantially the same as indicated for the final blend.

Oils A through D are significantly inferior to the oil composition prepared as described in Parts A and B with reference to oil consumption and volatility. The temperatures at which 5 and 50% volatilize are considerably lower than for the oil of the invention. The percentages of thin film remaining are appreciably lower, and the consumption in terms of quarts per 1000 miles are substantially higher, than the corresponding figures for the oil composition of the invention.

Comparison of the oil of the invention with oil E, on the other hand, shows that while the volatility and characterstics of the oils are approximately equal, the viscosity index is considerably lower. The high viscosities of oil E at 100 F., and particularly at 0 F., indicate poor cold weather starting characteristics.

Only the oil prepared in accordance with the invention has the hitherto elusive and desirable combination of high viscosity index, low low-temperature viscosity, low volatility and minimal loss of viscosity resulting from shear breakdown.

It is to be understood that numerous modifications will readily become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading this description. All such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claim.

We claim:

A high viscosity index, low viscosity, low volatility, motor oil composition having a viscosity below about 200 SSU at 100 F. and a viscosity of at least SSU at 210 F.; a viscosity index of at least 140; and a volatility at atmospheric pressure of less than 5% at about 735 F. and less than 50% at 800 F., said composition consisting essentially of (l) at least by volume of a thermally diffused mineral oil obtained by supjecting a solvent extracted mineral oil having a viscosity index of between and to liquid thermal diffusion under conditions including a temperature gradient, an area over which it is imposed, a spacing between the hot and cold walls, and a flow rate to produce a hot wall fraction having a viscosity index of between and 130, and (2) a maximum of 5% by volume of a high molecular weight polymer viscosity index improver.

References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,489,281 Foehr Nov. 29, 1949 2,492,789 Evans et al Dec. 27, 1949 2,541,070 Jones et al. Feb. 13, 1951 2,541,071 Jones et al. Feb. 13, 1951 2,694,685 Bartlett Nov. 16, 1954 2,756,197 Thorpe et al. July 24, 1956 OTHER REFERENCES Georgi: Motor Oil and Engine Lubrication, pub. by Reinhold Pub. Corp., N.Y., 1950, pages and 151.

Kalichevsky: Modern Methods of Refining Lubricating Oils, pub. by Reinhold Pub. Corp., N.Y., 1938, p. 20.

Chemical Refining of Petroleum, Kalichevsky et al.,

45 Reinhold Pub. Corp., N.Y., 1942, 2nd ed., page 413.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2489281 *Apr 4, 1947Nov 29, 1949California Research CorpMethacrylates in constant viscosity oils
US2492789 *Nov 21, 1946Dec 27, 1949Jasco IncLubricating oil composition
US2541070 *Jul 11, 1947Feb 13, 1951Standard Oil CoMethod of separating dissimilar components in petroleum products by liquid thermal diffusion
US2541071 *Jul 22, 1947Feb 13, 1951Standard Oil CoContinuous method for separating materials by liquid thermal diffusion
US2694685 *Aug 11, 1952Nov 16, 1954Standard Oil Dev CoMaleinoid-vinyl copolymer and its use in lubricants
US2756197 *May 18, 1953Jul 24, 1956Shell DevImproving lubricating oils by adsorption
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3251772 *Jan 30, 1962May 17, 1966Kaspar Winkler & CoLubricating composition containing cross-linked polymer
US3271121 *Mar 14, 1963Sep 6, 1966Sinclair Research IncEthylene-styrene copolymer as pour point depressant
US3903003 *Mar 6, 1974Sep 2, 1975Shell Oil CoLubricating compositions containing an amido-amine reaction product of a terminally carboxylated isoprene polymer
US3977979 *Sep 14, 1973Aug 31, 1976George A. Goulston Company, Inc.Yarn finish formulations
US4031020 *May 29, 1975Jun 21, 1977Nippon Oil Company, Ltd.Central system fluid composition
US4081390 *May 6, 1976Mar 28, 1978Orobis LimitedViscosity index improver composition
US4853337 *Oct 5, 1988Aug 1, 1989Exxon Chemicals Patents Inc.Reducing crude oil fouling tendency by adjusting the level of imcompatible asphaltenes in the blend stream
US4897176 *Jun 20, 1986Jan 30, 1990Exxon Chemical Patents Inc.Method of preparing baseoil blend of predetermined coking tendency
US5049257 *Nov 18, 1988Sep 17, 1991Sodick Co., Ltd.Fluid for electrical discharge machining
US5763374 *Aug 10, 1995Jun 9, 1998Sanyo Chemical Industries, Ltd.Acrylate-methacrylate copolymer for reducing high temperature viscosity
DE2210430A1 *Mar 3, 1972Jan 25, 1973Shell Int ResearchViskositaetsindexverbessertes schmieroel und seine herstellung