Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3001914 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateSep 26, 1961
Filing dateMar 5, 1956
Priority dateMar 5, 1956
Publication numberUS 3001914 A, US 3001914A, US-A-3001914, US3001914 A, US3001914A
InventorsAriel A Andersen
Original AssigneeAriel A Andersen
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Bacterial aerosol analyzer
US 3001914 A
Abstract  available in
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Sept. 26, 1961 A. A. ANDERSEN BACTERIAL AEROSOL ANALYZER Filed March 5. 1956 INVENTOR. Ar/e/ A. Andersen BY w F i 2 ATTORNEY llnited States Patent 3,001,914 BACTERIAL AEROSOL ANALYZER Ariel A. Andersen, 1074 Ash Ave., Provo, Utah Filed Mar. 5, 1956, Ser. No. 569,661 6 Claims. (Cl. 195103.5) (Granted under Title 35, US. Code (1952), sec. 266) The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States of America for governmental purposes without the payment to me of any royalty thereon.

This invention relates to an apparatus and method for counting and classifying viable particles in a gas. More particularly, the invention relates to an apparatus for counting bacteria or other microorganisms found in air,

water, soil or any substance that is capable of being suspended in air.

Specifically, the invention relates to a mechanism which serves to count and classify microorganisms in air and which will give a rapid and correct evaluation of these microorganisms.

The problem of determining contamination of the atmosphere by bacteria or other microorganisms is one of considerable difliculty since the time required for exposing and growing bacteria is considerable. Also, it is necessary to know the kind and relative size of such bacterial particles in order that remedial measures may be quickly taken.

It is the object of this invention to secure not only an accurate count, but an accurate classification of any microbial particles in the air and to separate such microbial particles according to size or mass and to grow them into colonies which can be analyzed.

In the drawings, FIG. 1 shows a top view of the apparatus. FIG. 2 shows a longitudinal section through the apparatus at 2, 2 of FIG. 1. FIG. 3 shows a corresponding section through two adjacent stages including the top stage. FIG. 4 shows diagrammatically the relative sizes of the perforations in the bottom of the respective stages.

More particularly, in the drawings, the cover is shown applied to the top unit 12. This is followed by subsequent units 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, and bottom unit 26. These cylindrical units are nested together under compression by means of spring tie rods 28. The units are held in air tight relation by means of plastic washers 30. Each unit has a transverse perforated wall 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42 with perforations progressively diminishing in size. The following table gives a series of sizes of perforations used and the range of particles which were collected under each size:

Diameter of holes in inches Size range of particles in microns Sampler Stage N o.

0 Below the perforated walls, Petri dishes 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54 are positioned. These dishes are partly filled with jections 58. By this means a continuous air channel isformed from the surface of each dish, around ,the'sides and under the same, to the perforated wall in the next lower stage. By this means a continuous air passage is created through the apparatus.

When suction is applied at the exit of bottom unit 36, air will enter through unit 10, pass through perforations 32 and around dish 44 through perforations 34 and so on, through all the stages of the analyzer. As the air passes through the perforations 32 its velocity is increased depending upon the size of the perforations and the rate at which the air is aspirated through the instrument. The viable particles in the air will reach a velocity corresponding to that of the air and the largest particles will be projected down to the surface of the nutrient medium in the first dish 44. Smaller particles, whose mass is less, do not reach the surface of the medium but are carried around dish 44 to pass through the smaller perforations 34 of the second stage 16. Due to the smaller perforations, the air velocity will be increased with the result that another group of particles will strike the nutrient medium in the second stage. This process continues with progressively diminishing perforations and progressively increasing air velocity at each stage, With the result that more and more of the particles are removed as the air approaches the exit of the apparatus. By choosing the proper sizes of perforations and the proper air rate, it is possible to remove all particles on the Various stages. If it is desired to leave an amount of the smallest particulate matter in the exit air, these may be filtered out with a millipore filter at the exit of the apparatus. This filter is not necessary, however, and the apparatus may be terminated as shown in FIG. 2. with a simple bottom exit plate 26.

When the desired air sample has been aspirated, the analyzer is disassembled and the respective Petri dishes are removed for culturing the viable organisms gathered thereon.

In sensitivity tests on this sampler it has been found that the instrument is capable of detecting a bacterial cloud generated from 200 ml. of slurry at a distance of 38 miles. The device is sensitive to one viable particle in the total volume of air sampled.

The ability of the sampler to separate different size particles has been accurately determined by making tests on non-viable materials. It has been determined that the sampler is capable of collecting particles on each stage a very narrow range of sizes. Tests have been made on particles of carnauba wax, Krylon and egg slurry. The particles from these materials are all spherical and their sizes are therefore easily determined by microscopic analysis.

The following table shows the percent of the total particles found on each stage in six runs using Krylon and emphasizes the ability of the sampler to separate airborne particles in sizes,

Distribution of Krylon particles in bacterial aerosol analyzer. Totals from 6 trials (Analyzer run at one cubic foot per minute) Gradicule Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Gradlcule size in Micrns (1.1) (1.6) (2.2) (3.1) (4.4) (6.3) (8.8) (12.5) (17.6)

percent From the distribution of pathogenic particles collected 25 creased so that by the time the last stage is reached, all

in the sampler, infection in animals or man may be predicted since it has been shown that respiratory infection by pathogenic particles is largely dependent upon the size of the particles inhaled.

This sampler has shown itself not only accurate but extremely convenient in making quick analysis of air samples where the presence of pathogenic particles is suspected. Results are obtained in about one-third the time compared with all glass impingers and at onehalf the cost in laboratory work per sample processed.

I claim:

1. A method for classifying and culturing viable particles suspended in a gas which comprises passing a volume of gas through a number of stages in series, each stage including means to impart a fixed velocity to the gas stream and to utilize said velocity to deposit suspended particles above a given mass on to a nutrient surface by impaction, each succeeding stage serving to impart a gas velocity in excess of that obtaining in the preceding stage thereby to deposit particles of lesser and lesser mass in each succeeding stage and incubating the viable particles on the respective nutrient media whereby the viable particles become visible as colonies.

2. Apparatus for classifying and culturing viable particles in a gas comprising a series of stages, each stage including a transverse, uniformly perforated member positioned above and spaced from a layer of nutrient medium, each succeeding stage containing uniform perforations of gradually diminishing size per stage from the inlet to outlet of the apparatus and including means for passing the particle containing gas through the several stages in series.

3. A method of classifying according to size and identifying viable microscopic particles suspended in air, which comprises passing a volume of air through a seiies of stages, each stage containing a Petri dish of solid nutrient medium below a perforated plate having a fixed number of holes, the size of which is constant in each stage but which decreases in size in each succeeding stage, whereby jets of air, produced by drawing air through the device, increase in velocity with each succeeding stage and wherein said velocity increase in each succeeding stage is utilized to separate the microscopic particles into groups of decreasing size and mass, such that the groups of particles are collected by impaction on the nutrient medium of each succeeding stage and particles which are of insuflicient size and mass to be impacted on a given stage follow the air stream around the dish into the next stage where the velocity is inviable particles will have attained a velocity sutficient for impaction on one stage or another with the particles having the smallest mass being collected on the last stage, thereafter incubating the Petri dishes whereby viable microscopic particles will grow into visible colonies, the number of which represent the number of viable particles collected on that stage.

4. An apparatus for classifying according to size and identifying viable microscopic airborne particles comprising a series of stagesvconnected together with air tight seals, each of said stages comprising a Petri dish of solid nutrient medium positioned a fixed distance below a perforated plate, the number of perforations in said plates being constant for all of the stages and the size of said perforations being constant for each stage, said perforations being of decreasing size for each succeeding stage, said perforations serving to produce air jets which impinge on the nutrient medium as air is drawn through the apparatus, the velocity of said air jets increasing with each succeeding stage thereby causing particulate matter in the air drawn through the apparatus to be deposited on the nutrient medium of the respective stages, the smallest particles being collected on the last stage.

5. Apparatus for classifying and culturing viable particles in a gas, comprising a series of stages, each stage including a transverse uniformly perforated member positioned above and spaced from a layer of nutrient medium, each succeeding stage containing uniform perforations of gradually diminishing size per stage from the inlet to the outlet of the apparatus and wherein each stage includes an integralfianged section that serves to nest with the flanged sections of adjacent stages, whereby the assembled stages create a cylindrical casing for the apparatus and including means for passing the particle containing gas through the several stages in series.

-6. Apparatus in accordance with claim 5 wherein a Petri dish containing the nutrient medium is supported on the next succeeding stage in a manner to permit the gas to pass around said dish and to pass through the perforations of the succeeding stage.

References Cited in the file ofthis patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 991,572 Weisenstein May 9, 1911 2,296,566 Neumann Sept. 22, 1942 2,538,116 May Jan 16, 1951 FOREIGN PATENTS 659 Great Britain 1911.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US991572 *Mar 30, 1910May 9, 1911Simon P WeisensteinAir-filter.
US2296566 *Aug 2, 1939Sep 22, 1942Willy NeumannFilter
US2538116 *Feb 7, 1946Jan 16, 1951Rowland May KennethApparatus for sampling particulate clouds
GB191100659A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3127329 *Sep 5, 1961Mar 31, 1964 Method and apparatus for sampling airborne micro-organisms
US3165450 *Mar 11, 1963Jan 12, 1965St Luke S Hospital Res FoundatAnaerobic culturing device
US3198713 *Jul 6, 1962Aug 3, 1965Ames Atomium IncStacked petri dishes
US3308558 *May 14, 1964Mar 14, 1967Michael D OrlandoEnvironmental chamber
US3693457 *Feb 24, 1971Sep 26, 1972Battelle Development CorpSource test cascade impactor
US3787290 *Apr 10, 1972Jan 22, 1974S KayeMethod and means for assaying biological factors demonstrating quantal response
US3795135 *Nov 7, 1972Mar 5, 19742000 IncSampler of air-borne particles
US3922905 *May 13, 1974Dec 2, 1975Roth Thomas PDisposable sampler
US3938366 *Oct 29, 1974Feb 17, 1976Applied BioscienceAerosol analyzer
US3949594 *Sep 25, 1974Apr 13, 1976The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of InteriorTwo-stage disposable particle sampling head
US3983743 *Sep 19, 1973Oct 5, 1976Sierra Instruments, Inc.Apparatus and method for the analysis of a particle-laden gas
US4038057 *Oct 22, 1975Jul 26, 1977Andersen 2000, Inc.Closed circuit sampler
US4189937 *Aug 3, 1977Feb 26, 1980Nelson Philip ABounceless high pressure drop cascade impactor and a method for determining particle size distribution of an aerosol
US4211116 *Jun 21, 1978Jul 8, 1980Electric Power Research Institute, Inc.Assembly for and method of sampling particle-laden fluids and a cascade impactor used therewith
US4255172 *Nov 14, 1979Mar 10, 1981Andersen Samplers Inc.Jet impaction preseparator
US4274846 *Feb 21, 1979Jun 23, 1981Andersen Samplers Inc.Particle sizing sampler
US4327594 *Jun 25, 1979May 4, 1982Nelson Philip ABounceless high pressure drop cascade impactor and a method for determining particle size distribution of an aerosol
US4387603 *Sep 28, 1981Jun 14, 1983Nelson Philip ABounceless high pressure drop cascade impactor and a method for determining particle size distribution of an aerosol
US4735899 *Mar 11, 1985Apr 5, 1988The Baker Company, Inc.Detection of airborne microorganisms
US5304125 *Mar 23, 1993Apr 19, 1994The University Of North CarolinaApparatus for administering solid particulate aerosols to the lungs
US5360722 *Jan 21, 1993Nov 1, 1994Kuraray Co., Ltd.Method and apparatus for determining air borne bacteria
US5731210 *Feb 25, 1997Mar 24, 1998R. J. Reynolds Tobacco CompanyEnvironmental evaporation chamber and method of using same
US5831182 *Oct 31, 1997Nov 3, 1998Swenson; Erik A.Remote sampling device for determining air borne bacteria contamination levels in controlled environments
US6043049 *Mar 31, 1999Mar 28, 2000Millipore S.A.Method for detecting micro-organisms and cartridge suitable for implementing it
US6133020 *May 7, 1997Oct 17, 2000Pitzurra; OvidioApparatus for determining the number of microorganisms in the air and a method of operating said apparatus
US6294375 *Apr 3, 1996Sep 25, 2001Ultra Propre Nutrition Industrie Recherche (U.N.I.R.)Microbiological pressurised gas control device
US6342388Nov 8, 1999Jan 29, 2002Pierre Van Den WildenbergCulture medium container, with integrated geometry for air suction and air conduction, for the purpose of air bacteria analysis
US6431014 *Jul 23, 1999Aug 13, 2002Msp CorporationHigh accuracy aerosol impactor and monitor
US6472203 *Nov 1, 2000Oct 29, 2002Environmental Microbiology Laboratory, Inc.Combination air sampling cassette and nutrient media dish
US6647758Dec 8, 2000Nov 18, 2003Msp CorporationMethod and apparatus for verifying integrity of cascade impactors
US6685759Jul 11, 2002Feb 3, 2004Southern Research InstituteCascade impactor and jet plate for same
US6695146 *Sep 17, 2001Feb 24, 2004Mesosystems Technology, Inc.Method for surface deposition of concentrated airborne particles
US6938777Feb 11, 2003Sep 6, 2005Mesosystems Technology, Inc.Method for removing surface deposits of concentrated collected particles
US7265669Mar 1, 2004Sep 4, 2007Mesosystems Technology, Inc.Networks with sensors for air safety and security
US7578973Mar 1, 2004Aug 25, 2009Mesosystems Technology, Inc.Devices for continuous sampling of airborne particles using a regenerative surface
US7591980Mar 1, 2004Sep 22, 2009Mesosystems Technology, Inc.Biological alarm
US7597015 *Jul 7, 2006Oct 6, 2009New York UniversityParticle size sampler
US7759123Mar 21, 2006Jul 20, 2010Mesosystems Technology, Inc.Removing surface deposits of concentrated collected particles
US7799567Jul 18, 2006Sep 21, 2010Mesosystems Technology, Inc.Air sampler based on virtual impaction and actual impaction
US7926368Oct 26, 2007Apr 19, 2011Zefon International, Inc.Humidity-controlled gas-borne matter collection device
US8047053May 9, 2008Nov 1, 2011Icx Technologies, Inc.Mail parcel screening using multiple detection technologies
US8173431Nov 9, 2006May 8, 2012Flir Systems, Inc.Mail screening to detect mail contaminated with biological harmful substances
US8243274Mar 9, 2010Aug 14, 2012Flir Systems, Inc.Portable diesel particulate monitor
US8596462Sep 9, 2005Dec 3, 2013Bae Systems PlcParticle separator
US20040232052 *Mar 1, 2004Nov 25, 2004Call Charles JohnMethods and devices for continuous sampling of airborne particles using a regenerative surface
US20050190058 *Mar 1, 2004Sep 1, 2005Call Charles J.Networks with sensors for air safety and security
US20090233350 *Mar 10, 2009Sep 17, 2009Covidien AgRespiratory apparatus with a bioburden indicator
US20100212436 *Aug 26, 2010Erik Axel SwensonSingle use sterile slit impact sampling cassette with rotatable capture tray
US20110183371 *Jun 25, 2009Jul 28, 2011Hideyuki NodaMicrobe-collecting carrier cartridge, carrier treating apparatus, and method of measuring microbes
US20130045893 *Jan 14, 2011Feb 21, 2013The University Of Bristish ColumbiaApparatuses for determining whether a substance is carried in a fluid
EP0952211A1 *Apr 21, 1999Oct 27, 1999Millipore S.A.Method for detecting micro-organisms and cartridge suitable for implementing it
EP1008646A1 *Nov 13, 1998Jun 14, 2000van den Wildenberg, PierreCulture medium container with integrated air suction and circulation geometry for aerial germs
EP1330637A2 *Sep 25, 2001Jul 30, 2003Southern Research InstituteParticulate and process gas stream sampler
WO2002026341A2 *Sep 25, 2001Apr 4, 2002Southern Res InstParticulate and process gas stream sampler
WO2006027591A1 *Sep 9, 2005Mar 16, 2006Bae Systems PlcParticle separator
WO2006072691A1 *Dec 21, 2005Jul 13, 2006AcantheSieve for bio-impactor, bio-impactor equipped with same
Classifications
U.S. Classification435/30, 73/28.5, 55/325, 435/305.1, 96/417, 435/299.2, 435/288.3, 55/485, 435/304.2, 435/309.1, 435/34, 435/305.4
International ClassificationC12M1/26
Cooperative ClassificationC12M33/14, C12M33/04, C12M41/36, C12M23/10
European ClassificationC12M1/26B