Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3007596 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateNov 7, 1961
Filing dateJul 16, 1956
Priority dateJul 16, 1956
Also published asDE1214711B
Publication numberUS 3007596 A, US 3007596A, US-A-3007596, US3007596 A, US3007596A
InventorsLadislas C Matsch
Original AssigneeUnion Carbide Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Thermal insulation
US 3007596 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

L. C. MATSCH THERMAL INSULATION LADISLAS C. MATSCH Nov. 7, 1961 posj're lnsula'rlon b V ,if

PaTh of Heat Transfer Com TTORNEY United rates 3,007,596 THERMAL INSULATION Ladislas C. Matsch, Kenmore, N.Y., assigner to Union This invention relates to an improved insulation having a high resistance to all modes of heat transfer, and particularly concerns la low temperature, heat insulating material adapted to improve a vacuum insulating system.

In the conservation and conveying of low temperature commercial productsfor example, perishable commodities which must be held at low temperatures for substantial periods of time, and valuable volatile materials, such as liquefied gases having boiling points at atmospheric pressure below 233 K., for example, liquid oxygen or nitrogenha major problem encountered is the control of heat leak to the material, which in the case of liquefied gases results in loss due to evaporation. ln the conventional double walled liquid-oxygen container, the space between the walls is suitably insulated to limit this evaporation loss. However, up to now it has not been possible to provide [an insulation system, particularly for small, portable containers having small volumes in comparison with the surface areas, which will limit the evaporation loss to satisfactorily low values.

The basic systems for insulating the conventional double walled container for the conveyance and storage of low boiling liquefied gases :are for small containers, the Dewar type high vacuum-polished metal surface system and for large containers, the powder-in-vacuurn insulation System, which uses an insulating powder in the vacuum space between the walls. This system is described in detail in U.S. Patent 2,396,459. Although powder-invacuuxn heat insulation is effective in reducing thermal heat loss, it is not as effective as straight vacuum-polished metal surface for containers up to two feet in diameter. While these systems have greatly affected the commercial considerations as applied to storage and conveyance of low ltemperature products, there, nevertheless, exists a great commercial need for more efiicient insulating materials capable of meeting more rigid and exacting requirements, and which will provide even lower thermal conductivitics than those `afforded by either of the above-described insulators. Provision of such materials would permit the Study, development and creation of important new and improved control techniques for many processes and products.

To give some insight into the problems that are presented in effecting further reductions in heat leak for small portable containers, suppose for example that it is desired to insulate `a double ywalled cylindrical container for low boiling liquefied gases such las oxygen, so that the evaporation loss due to heat leak will be less than 1% of the contained material per day. Assume further that the container will have hemispherical ends, an inner diameter of 8 inches and an inner total length of 48 inches. Using one of the best insulating materials ofthe prior art, for example, powder-invacuurn insulation, in accordance with U.S. Patent 2,396,459, the vacuum being on the 'order of 0.1 micron of mercury absolute, a thermal conductivity of 9.2X104 Btu/hr., sq. ft., F./iit. may be achieved. ln order to more fully appreciate the significance of such a thermal'conductivity, :the insulating effects of the following insulation thicknesses are set forth. An insulation thickness of 1.6.6 inches of a powder-in-vacuurn insulation will permit an evaporation loss. of 7.1% per day. Such an insulation thickness results in an insulation cross sectional area equal to the useful cross sectional area of the inner storage container. In other words, beyond the thickness of 1.66 inches, the bulk of the insulation which must be stored land/ or transported becomes greater than the bulk of the contained stored material.

Increasing the thickness of such an insulation to 4 inches reduces the loss rate to 3.6% per day, while increasing the insulation volume to about 3 times that of the storage capacity of the inner container. In fact, it is entirely impractical to consider insulating the vessel with ya material hav-ing aconductivity of 9.2. 10F4 B tu/ hr., sq. it., F./ft., since calculations show the theoretical required insulation thickness to be lGS inches.

Considering a straight vacuum insulating system in which the walls of the inner and outer vessels within the insulation space yare polished in order to reflect radiant heat energy, .there is a problem of maintaining a sufficiently low vacuum to eliminate heat conduction by residual gas. For this purpose the absolute pressure within the insulating space must be maintained et a value l0 to 100 times lower than when a powder-in vacuum insulating system is used. Consequently, the vacuum must be less than `0.()1 micron of mercury absolute pressure. This may be obtainable in special laboratory equipment, but it is quite lan impractical specification for fabricated vmetal vessels intended for industrial service. Considering for a moment the possibility that low vacuum conditions could be maintained so that heat transmission by conduction through the residual gas would be negligible, there still remains the problem of achieving the necessary reflectivity for the vessel walls. To obtain `a maximum loss nate of 1% per day, calcul-ations indicate that surface retlectivities of at least 99.6% must be obtained. Re iiectivities of this ord-er are only obtainable, if at all, under strictly controlled laboratory conditions, which may not be duplicated or maintained either during fabrication of the container, Ior after the container is in service.

A lower quality reflective surface may be tolerated by interposing several concentric reflective shields within the insulation space as described in U.S. Patent 2,643,022. However, one of the difficulties involved in such an arrangement is in assembling and supporting many reflective shields within a reasonable insulation thickness so that each shield is properly spaced from adjacent shields at all points. Proper spacing is an absolute necessity, for if two adjacent shields are permitted t0contact in even a minute area, the insulating effect of one shield will be essentially cancelled out. Moreover, the number of shields required depends on their surfacerellectivity. If

,a very highly polished surface is provided for both vessel walls and the shields, the polished surface having a reilectivity of then it may be shown by calculation that at least 10 such shields must be used in order to achieve a 1% per day heat loss rate in the described vessel. At the same time, to maintain a reasonable thickness of insulation, the shields must be spaced as close together as possible. Allowing for inaccuracies in forming and assembling the shields, the spacing of at least 1A inch would appear to be reasonable. Ten shields between the container walls would provide l1 spaces, and taking the thickness of the shields into consideration, would account for lan overall thickness of at least 3 inches. Under these circumstances the fabrication of vessels having a heat loss rate of less than 1% per day would be costly and time-consuming.

In view of these obstacles, up to the present time it has been impossible to approach, much less achieve, heat leaks of such restricted quantities for applications in- -volving extended periods of storage of low boiling liquefied gases in portable storage containers.

It is, therefore, animportant object of the present invention to provide a greatly improved insulation systcm for reducing heat transmission by all modes of heat transfer to values well below that of any previously known insulating system.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a novel insulating material in an insulation system where radiation would otherwise be an important mode of heat transfer.

Another object of the invention is to provide in a low heat conductive material wherein radiation is the predominant remaining mode of heat transfer, one or more parallel radiant heat barriers interposed in said low conductive material for substantially reducing the passage of radiant heat therethrough.

Yet another object of the invention is to provide in a low heat conductive insulation, a series of spaced, heat reflecting barriers so constructed and arranged as to impede the passage of radiant heat through said insulation without affecting the thermal conductivity thereof.

Another object of the present invention is to provide in a restricted gas-evacuated insulating space, a plurality of radiation barriers, said barriers being disposed in spaced relation to each other, and maintained in such spaced position by a low heat conductive spacing material.

Still another object of the present invention is to provide in a vacuum-solid insulating space for small portable containers, a multiplicity of radiation barriers comprising spaced and parallel foils of heat reflective material for reducing the transfer of heat by radiation, and a spacing material between said radiation barriers, cornprising a low-conductive, heat insulating material for reducing the transfer of heat by conduction between said barriers.

A further object of the present invention is to provide an improved method of fabricating and applying a heat insulation for cylindrical containers wherein the heat insulation comprises a low-conductive, heat insulating material for reducing the transfer of heat by conduction, and incorporates therein a multiplicity of radiation sheet barriers for reducing the transfer of heat by radiation.

A further object of the present invention is to provide in an enclosed volume defining a gas evacuated insulating space, a novel insulating structure adapted to fill the insulating space and effect contact with the wall surfaces defining the insulating space, said insulating space being characterized by the absence of gross voids, and having a low rate of heat transfer by conduction and radiation.

Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following detailed description.

In the drawings:

FIG. l is a front elevational view, partly in section, of a double walled liquid gas container embodying the principles of the invention;

FIG. 2 is an isometric view of the composite insulating material of the invention shown in a flattened position with parts broken away to expose underlying layers;

FIG. 3 is a greatly enlarged detail sectional view showing the irregular path of heat transfer through the composite insulating material of the invention;

FIG. 4 is a sectional view taken along line 4 4 of FIG. l, illustrating the spiral wrapping of insulating material of the invention;

FIG. 5 is a sectional view similar to FIG. 4, but showing a concentric layered modification thereof; and

FIG. 6 is a fragmentary elevational view, in section, of a modified double walled liquid gas container embodying the principles of the invention.

In the past, radiation shields used in vacuum spaces have been constructed for the most part to be supportingly suspended in spaced relation to each other. Numerous small diameter supports were employed in the vacuum space to support the insulated vessel and to maintain proper shield spacing. A minimum number of these supports were employed to constrict the passage of heat leak by conduction. The remaining space was left unfilled in order not to create additional pathways for thermal conduction. Furthermore, it was believed that the reflective characteristics of the shields would be seriously impaired by contact with an insulating filler.

lI have made the amazing discovery that the insulating qualities of an evacuated insulating space may be substantially enhanced to a degree never before attained with a novel insulating structure, which may occupy part of or the entire insulating space. Yet the insulating structure does not require numerous brace bars or other supports, does not provide gross voids in the insulating space, and can also be employed as a novel means for elastically supporting the insulated inner container.

More specifically, I have discovered that the transmission of heat across a solid-in-vacuum type insulation may be substantially reduced to a degree greater than has heretofore been possible by the use of a low heat conductive material which incorporates therein one or more radiation impervious shields to substantially eliminate heat leak by radiation.

Furthermore, I have discovered that the placing of reflective shields in direct contact with an insulating material does not substantially impair the radiation barrier qualities of the shields.

The term vacuum as used hereinafter is intended to apply to sub-atmospheric absolute pressure conditions not substantially greater than 5000 microns of mercury, and preferably below 1000 microns of mercury. For superior quality results, the pressure should preferably be below 25 microns of mercury.

According to the invention, a vacuum insulated space is provided with a low heat conductive material having incorporated therein one or more radiation barriers disposed substantially transversely to the direction of heat flow in spaced relation to each other. The radiation barriers or shields of the invention may comprise one or more sheets of heat absorbing material, or preferably thin sheets or layers of a material possessing high reflecting characteristics when exposed to infra-red radiation, such as aluminum or tin foil. The low conductive material also acts as a supporting and spacing material for retaining the radiation barrier sheets in uniformly spaced relation to each other independently of the thickness and stiffness of the barriers. In this manner it is possible for a large number of thin foils to be supportably mounted and maintained in position in an insulation space of limited thickness. A clearance of a few thousandths of an inch between foils is enough to effectively interrupt and reflect the radiant heat. In this way it is possible to provide a large number of shields in a very limited space, ranging up to several hundred shields per inch of composite insulation thickness.

Shown in FIG. l is a double walled heat insulating vessel having parallel inner and outer container walls 10a and 10b and an evacuated insulating space 11 therebetween. Disposed within the insulation space 11 is a composite insulation material 12 embodying the principles of the invention, and comprising essentially a low heat conductive material 13 having incorporated therein multiple reflective shields or radiation barriers 14 in contiguous relation for diminishing the transfer of heat by radiation across the insulating space 11. In assembly, the insulation occupies the entire insulating space 11, and appears as a series of spaced reflectors 14 disposed substantially transversely to direction of heat flow and supportably carried by the solid, low conductive insulating material. The insulating material. uniformly contacts and supports the entire surface of each radiation shield in superposed relation and, in addition to its primary purpose of serving as an insulating material, constitutes a carrier and spacing material for maintaining a separation space between adjacent shields. No other supports are required to maintain the insulation in operative assembled relation.

The radiation shield material 14 to be used in the insulation material 12 of the invention may comprise either a metal, metal oxide, or metal coated material, such as aluminum coated plastic lm, or other-radiation refiective or radiation absorptive material or a suitable combination thereof. Radiation reflective materials comprising thin metallic foils are admirably suited in the practice of the present invention, while reective sheets of aluminum foil having a thickness between 0.2 mm. and @.002 mm. are preferred. Other radiation reiiective materials which are susceptible of use in the practice of the invention are tin, silver, gold, copper, cadmium or other metals.

The base material lf3 of the invention may be a suitably low conductive material such as fiber insulation, which may be produced in sheet form. It should preferably be thin enough to -be liexibly bent. Among the spacing materials which give excellent results are the porous unbonded fiber-type insulating materials which do not give ofi gas, for example, a filamentary glass material such as glass wool and ber glass, the latter being preferred because of its low conductivity and foraminous structure, and the ease with which the air spaces within the brous structure may be evacuated. The base material may also comprise a combination of the fibers with low conductive powder insulation, vas specified hereinafter, or any other combination of suitably low conductive materials.

ri`he invention will be described in connection with a multi-layer insulation in a vacuum space having a pressure less than 0.1 micron of mercury, using aluminum foils as the radiant heat barriers, and commercial grades of fiber glass sheetings as low conductive insulation, and as the supporting and separating media between sheets of aluminum foil. This composite insulation has been found to aord a particularly efficient means for minimizing the transfer of heat by all modes of heat transfer across a vacuum insulated space, but it is to be understood that the same principles apply regardless of the nature of the speciiic material used.

As a preferred feature of the invention, the low conductive sheet of ber glass separating material i3 to be used in the present vacuum-solid insulating system should be fabricated in such manner that its fibers are, for all intents and purposes, randomly disposed within the plane of the separating sheet, and oriented in a direction substantially perpendicular to the flow of heat. it will be understood that as a practical matter, the fibers will not be individually confined to a single plane, but rather, in a finite thickness of fibrous material, the fibers will be generally disposed in thin parallel strata with, of course, some indiscriminate cross weaving of iibers across the various strata.

While we do not wish to be bound by any particular theory, we believe the principal reasons for the far superior insulating effects achieved by such a fiber orientation are the relatively few iibers traversing the thickness o-f the insulating sheet and the point contacts established between crossing fibers. These point contacts represent thepoints of ioinder between adjacent fibers in the direction of heat flow, and as such, constitute an extremely high resistance to the flow of heat by conduction. ln this fashion it is possible to achieve in a finite thickness of insulating material, an extremely high degree of conductive insulation between proximate sheets of aluminum foil. Best results have been obtained when the fiber diameter is less than 1.0 micron, although larger diameter ibers up to about 10.0 microns, and in some instances as high as 50 microns, depending upon the insulation thickness employed, still produce results equal to or better than the best known practical insulation of the prior art.

The sequence of modes of heat transfer which might occur in a typical multi-layer insulation of aluminum foils which are proximately spaced from each other by sheetings of glass fiber having a fiber orientation substantially parallel to the aluminum foils and transverse to the direction of heat flow, might be as follows.

Referring to FIG. 3, radiant heat striking the rst sheet of aluminum foil will for the most part be reected, and the remaining part absorbed. Part of this absorbed radiation will tend to travel toward the next barrier by reradiation, where again it will be mostly reflected, part will travel by solid conduction, and a minor part by conduction through the residual gas. According to the solid conduction method of heat transfer, the heat leak proceeds along the fibers in what might be considered an irregular path, crossing relatively small areas of point contact between crossing iibers until it reaches the second sheet of aluminum foil, where the hea-t reiiecting and absorbing process described above is repeated. Because of the particular orientation of the glass fibers, the path of solid conduction from the first sheet of aluminum foil to the second is greatly lengthened, and encompasses an indeinitely large number of point contact resistances between contacting iibers. Bn analogy it will be seen that a multi-layer insulation having a series of heat reflecting sheets and a fiber oriented sheet of low conductive insulating material .therebetween may be particularly ehicient in preventing or diminishing heat losses by radiation, as well as by conduction.

in the practice of the present invention, the radiation shield spacing may vary from one-half to two hundred la yers per inch. Where the quality of the insulation is of prime importance, the preferred number of shields may vary between 4 and l0() shields per inch. For the purposes of this invention, the insulation may be also related tothe size of the container to which it is applied. Thus, for small containers having a diameter less than two feet, an insulation thickness up to three inches is desirable, using at least l5 layers of shields per inch in a glass fiber insulation having a fiber diameter less than one micron. For vessels above two feet in diameter a coarser fiber diameter up to l0 microns may be used, and for very large containers of tank car size or larger, iiber diameters up to 50 microns may be employed; the insulation thickness may vary up to 24 inches, and the shield spacing may be as great as 1/2 shield per inch or one shield for every two inches of insulation thickness. In any case, the insulation thickness should contain at least one radiation shield, and the shield spacing should not exceed 5% of the container diameter. As a practical matter, the usual space should preferably contain a minimum number of at least three shields. It is to be understood, however, that the invention is not necessarily limited to the above ranges, and that a larger or smaller number of shields may be satisfactorily employed in the practice of the invention, depending upon the particular conditions involved in the application of the invention.

@ne of the important advantages in fthe thermal insulation of the present invention is that the flexibility of the layers of aluminum foil and fiber glass allows the insulation thickness as a whole -to be pliably bent so as to conform to irregularities and changes in the surface conditions of the container to be insulated. The cornposite material of the invention is adapted to be applied to contoured surfaces, and is particularly well suited for insulating either iiat or cylindrical surfaces.

Gbviously the multiple foil insulation of the invention may be mounted in the insulation space in any one of a variety oi' ways. For example, in FdG. 5, the insulation 12 may be mounted concentricaily with respect to the inner container lita, or it may be, as in FlG. 4,' spirally wrapped around the inner container with one end of the insulation wrapping in contact with the inner container dita, and `the other end nearest the outer container 10b or in actual contact therewith, the latter form `of Vmounting being preferred and illustrated herein. In

either case, the composite insulation of the present invention does not support the walls of the vacuum space against external loads and, hence, is external load-free. Referring to FiG. 4, the metal foil may be loosely spirally wrapped around ythe inner container "a, the tightness and number of turns being varied to `suit the particular conditions, or the requirements desired. Tightening of the insulation wrapping causes the low conductive and resilient fibrous material to be compressed into a smaller space. This action decreases the percentage voids in the fibrous material, and increases the cross sectional area of the effective path of solid conduction. However, the voids are reduced in size, which results in the insulation being less sensitive to changes in casing pressure. On the other hand, wrapping the insulation too loosely decreases the number of turns of radiation shielding in the insulation space, and increases heat leak by radiation. Optimum results obtain somewhere between these extremes when the sum of the heat leaks due to radiation and conduction is a minimum. By providing a large number of turns of insulation wrappings, the passage of radiative heat is substantially eliminated, while the conductive heat flow along the spiral path is effectively reduced owing to the lengthened heat path.

It will be recognized that because of the difficulty involved in conformably applying the composite insulation material 12 of the invention to surfaces other than flat or cylindrical surfaces without sacrificing insulating qualities, for maximum benefit it may be advantageous in some instances to employ a supplementary low heat conductive `material in combination with the insulation 12.

In the modification shown in FIG. 6 the composite insulation material 12 of the invention may be employed in the cylindrical portion 11a of the insulation space 11, and the end portions 11b of the insulation space, including the fiat bottom portion and the upper spherical portion, provided with a supplemental low heat conductive material 16. The supplemental low heat conductive materials which may be used in the terminal sections 11b may comprise a finely divided powder of the type disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 2,396,459, or any other suitably low conductive material.

Coupled with the composite insulation 12, the supplemental insulation 16 maintains the extremities of the individual foil barriers 14 in spaced apart relation, and provides the means for producing low thermal heat transfers in containers of a wide variety of shapes. The cooperative relationship between the supplemental insulation 16 and the composite insulation 12 meets the requirements of the most critical present day insulation standards, and has extended the usefulness and capabilities of the present invention.

I have found that a very significant advantage of the present invention arises from the elastic properties of the insulation, particularly when a fibrous insulation is employed in the annular insulating space of a double Walled container. The ability of the insulation to give and resist movement of the inner container, and to restore or expand itself when the forces exerted upon it are relaxed, enables it to operate along the lines of a shock mount. Obvious advantages to using the insulation as an elastic support are that the inner container is maintained in substantially centered position, and the need for braces or other supports is obviated, thus further reducing the heat leak into the container.

On the surface it might seem that a more effective insulation may be obtained by providing additional turns of insulation wrapping. In a number of actual tests to determine thermal conductivity, the insulating system of the invention was found to be affected by a number of variables. These tests were conducted under carefully controlled conditions, using a double walled container having an evacuated insulation space containing the insulation of the invention, one Wall of the container being maintained at a lower temperature of either 183.2 C. or -195.9 C., and the other wall having an upper temperature ranging from approximately 20 C. to approximately 50 C. Representative results of these tests are tabulated below in Tables I and II. In Table I, the

pressure in the insulation space is less than 0.1 micron of mercury, while in Table II the pressure is varied as indicated therein.

TABLE I Thermal conductivilies of nsulatons of the present invention Temp. of Double Walled Container, K 103 C. Btu/hr., Material sq. ft., F./ft. Higher Lower Temp. Temp.

78 sheets of glass ber per inch separated individually by aluminum foil (fiber diameter 0.2 to 0.5 micron). 97 sheets ofhglatss ber peri inci wth warmer s ee s separate in ivi ually and colder sheets separated iu 5 pairs by aluminum foil (ber diameter 0.5 to 0.75 micron). 9% sheets of glass ber per inch separated individually by aluminum foil (ber diameter 2.5 to 3.8 microns) 22 195. 9 0.075 24 layers per inch of finely divided 47.0 `183.2 0.274 silica separated by aluminum foil. 21.5 183. 2 0. 242

TABLE II Eect of pressure in insulation space on insulations of the present invention [Higher temperature of container wall 20 C. Lower temperature of container wall l95.9 0.]

Itis evident from the above that Ian important variable influencing the performance of the present insulating system is the ber diameter of the low conductive spacing material. Depending upon the thickness of insulation and the number of radiation shields, ber diameters up to about 50 microns may be satisfactorily employed in the practice of the invention. A small ber diameter of less than 10 microns is desirable, while a fiber diameter less than 1 micron is preferred for superior quality insulations.

Another variable affecting insulating performance is the gas pressure in the insulating space. Obviously, from the data given in Table II, the insulating system of the present invention is affected by changes in pressure, the thermal conductivity increasing with increasing air pressure. As an additional feature of the invention, the adverse effect of increased pressure may be minimized by filling the voids between the fibers for example with a very fine, low conductive powder.

In order to indicate still more fully the nature of the present invention, the following comparison of heat transfer rates between 1) A solid-in-vacuum insulating system using insulating powder in the vacuum space in accordance with U.S. Patent No. 2,396,459,

(2) A high vacuum-polished metal surface system using radiation shields in the vacuum space in accordance with U.S. Patent No. 2,643,022, and

(3) An insulating system constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention, are set forth in Table IH, it being understood that the data presented therein is illustrative only, and not intended to limit the scope of the invention.

TABLE III Insulation characteristics between +20 C. and -1832 C.

Pressure in Thermal Con- Type of Insulation Vacuum Space, ductivity, Mierons Btn/hr., Mercury sq. ft., F./it.

0.1 9. 2)(10-4 0. 01 1. 9 l04 0.1 u. axis-4 It is seen from this table that the heat insulating efficiency of the present invention is approximately l times better than insulation (2), and more than 45 times higher than insulation (l).

From the above description it will, therefore, be seen that the present invention provides in a solid-in-vacuum type insulation, a low heat conductive material having incorporated therein multiple radiation shields for impeding radiative heat transmission through the insulation, while minimizing the ow of heat by conduction therethrough. The low conductive material uniformly supports and maintains the radiation shields in spaced relation. A low conductive material which is admirably suited for use in the practice of the invention is one having a iibrous structure oriented in a direction perpendicular to the direction Vof heat iiow. Possessed or" a high percentage of voids, the low conductive insulating material provides a very small, solid conduction heat path between radiation foils, and is remarkably efficient in minimizing the transmission of heat leak by conduction.

insulating systems of the invention, using a ne diameter, low conductive, fiber-type insulating material, have been found to be superior to any known insulating systern. Employing coarser, low-conductive insulating iibers, the present insulation achieves low thermal conductivities, which are comparable or superior to those obtained with either high quality straight vacuums or the best powderin-vacuum systems known, yet is considerably less eX- pensive than either of these forms of insulation, and does not require as low absolute pressures as straight vacuumpolished metal insulating systems.

It will be understood that variations and modifications may be eiected without departing from the novel concepts of the present invention. For example, vvhile a single layer thickness of low conductive material is shown between adjacent heat retlecting shields, it should be understood that more than one layer may be employed in the practice of the invention.

What is claimed is:

1. In a Vacuum insulating space, a low heat conductive fibrous material, a multiplicity of radiation-impervious sheets supportably carried by said fibrous material, said radiation-impervious sheets being disposed in parallel spaced relation to each other, and said fibrous material having a iber orientation substantially parallel to said sheets and substantially perpendicular to the direction of heat ow across said space, and a line low-conductive powder in the voids between the bers of said iibrous material, whereby said sheets and iibrous material are effective in reducing the transmission of radiant heat across said space without perceptibly increasing the heat transmission by conduction thereacross, and whereby said powder reduces the variation in thermal conductivity of said fibrous material and sheets due to changes in pressure conditions in said space.

2. An apparatus provided with a gas evacuated insulating space surrounding a storage container and being enclosed by rigid, self-supporting walls, a heat insulative and radiation-impervious composite flexible material comprising a multiplicity of thin-flexible, radiant heat barrier layers of thickness between 0.002 mm. and 0.2 mm. in said insulating space disposed in spaced relation to each 10 other for reducing the transmission of radiant heat across said space, and a multiplicity of low heat conductive porous, librous sheet layers composed of fibers having diameters less than about li) microns, being ycoextensive with such radiation barrier layers and disposed in contiguous adjacency between and in spirally wound alternating sequence with said barriers around said storage container for separating and supporting said barriers spaced from each other, the radiant heat barrier lowconductive yfibrous sheet composite insulating material being spirally wound suliiciently tightly to provide at least 4 radiant heat barriers per inch of composite insulation and disposed generally perpendicular to the direction of heat inleak across said space.

3. An apparatus provided with a vacuum insulating space according to claim 2, the radiant heat barrier layers consisting of metal foil.

4. An apparatus provided with a vacuum insulating space according to claim 2, the radiant heat barrier layers consisting of aluminum foil.

5. An apparatus provided with a vacuum insulating space according to claim 2, the fibrous sheet layers consisting of filamentary glass material.

6. An apparatus provided `with a vacuum insulating space according to claim 2, the iibrous sheet layers consisting of glass liber.

7. A container for the holding of materials'at low temperatures, comprising an inner vessel having rigid, self-supporting walls for holding such material, a larger outer gas-tight shell also having rigid, self-supporting Walls extending about said inner vessel, providing therewith an intervening evacuable external load-tree insulation space at an absolute pressure not substantially greater than 25 microns of mercury, said insulation space containing a series of spaced layers of porous, fibrous, low heat conductive, oriented material wherein the liber diam'- eters are less than about l0 microns, and a series of spaced radiation barriers of thickness between 0.002 mm. 0.2 mm. coextensive with and being separated and supported by said iibrous, oriented material for reducing the transmission of radiant heat across said space without perceptively incr-easing the heat transmission by conduction thereacross, the radiant heat barrier-low conductive fibrous sheet composite insulating material being spirally around said inner vessel sufficiently tightly to provide at least 4 radiant heat barriers per inch of composite insulation and disposed generally perpendicular to the direction of heat in eak across said space.

8. in a double-walled low-temperature boiling liqueed-gas container having a cylindrical vacuum space between uniformly spaced rigid inner and outer walls, an external load-free solid-in-vacuum thermal insulation disposed Within such space comprising the combination with a multi-convoluted wrapping on such inner wall consisting of a continuous thin sheet of reective metal foil of thickness between 0.002 mm. and 0.2 mm.; of relatively thin, continuous, porous felt batting of glass iiber sandwiched between the convolutions of such foil, which eliectively supports and separates adjacent convolutions of such foil sheet from each other and completely -fills the space therebetween with clean, iieecy, compressible, unbonded, tine fibers of glass having ber diameters less than about l0 microns and being oriented by transverse compression thereof between such convolutions of metal foil sheet, in directions substantially perpendicular to the ow of heat in-leak; such glass fiber felt batting and foil sheet composite insulation substantially lling such cylindrical space sutciently tightly to provide at least 4 layers oi' foil sheet per inch of composite insulation and being highly effective to substantially decrease heat flow therein between such outer and inner walls, thereby substantially reducing heat iii-leak to the interior of the container by all modes of heat transfer, by virtue of the many convolutions of such insulation that can be made in such space that is available therefor, while miniinizing heat in-leak by conduction across the space occupied by such felt batting compressed between such foil convolutions; said insulation having a thermal conductivity valve of not more than 0.74 103, when such heat-leak is measured at a temperature difference between such Walls of +20 C. to 195 C., under a vacuum in such space of 25 microns pressure (maximum) of mercury, when the total heat flow is measured in B.t.u.s, the time in hours, the area in square feet, and the temperature difference in F., and total thickness of insulation in feet.

9. In an apparatus provided with a vacuum insulating space, a composite multi-layered, external load-free insulation in said space comprising low conductive l'ibrous sheet material layers composed of ibers for reducing heat transfer by gaseous conduction and thin, ilexible sheet radiation barrier layers, said radiation barrier layers being supportably carried in superposed relation by said brous sheet layers to provide a large number of radiation barrier layers in a limited space for reducing the transmission of radiant heat across said space Without perceptively increasing the heat transmission by solid conduction thereacross, each radiation barrier layer being disposed in contiguous relation on opposite sides with a layer of the fibrous sheet material, the bers of said brous sheet material being oriented substantially parallel to the radiation barrier layers and substantially perpendicular to the direction of heat inleak across the insulating space, said brous sheet material being composed of bers having diameters less than about 10 microns, said radiation barrier sheet having a thickness less than about 0.2 mm., and said multi-layered composite insulation being disposed in the insulation space to provide more than 12 4 radiation barrier layers per inch of said composite insulation.

10. An apparatus provided with a vacuum insulating space according to claim 9, the radiant heat barrier layers consisting of metal plated plastic sheet.

References Cited in the le of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 218,340 Toope Aug. 5, 1879 673,073 Bobrick Apr. 30, 1901 1,424,604 Weber Aug. 1, 1922 1,626,655 Woodson May 3, 1927 1,969,621 Munters Aug. 7, 1934 1,973,880 Moody Sept. 18, 1934 2,104,548 Schweller Jan. 4, 1938 2,159,053 Saborsky May 23, 1939 2,345,204 Lodwig Mar. 28, 1944 2,396,459 Dana Mar. 12, 1946 2,485,647 Norquist Oct. 25, 1949 2,513,749 Schilling July 4, 1950 2,619,804 Widel Dec. 2, 1952 2,643,021 Freedman June 23, 1953 2,702,458 Del Mar Feb. 22, 1955 2,759,522 Limm Aug, 21, 1956 2,776,776 Strong et al. Ian, 8, 1957 FOREIGN PATENTS 143,219 Great Britain Dec. 9, 1920 712,042 France July 13, 1931 840,786 Germany June 5, 1952 683,855 Great Britain Dec. 3, 1952 715,174 Great Britain Sept. 8, 1954

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US218340 *Mar 12, 1879Aug 5, 1879 Improvement in coverings for steam-boilers
US673073 *Nov 8, 1900Apr 30, 1901Gabriel A BobrickReceptacle for containing liquid air or other gases.
US1424604 *Sep 27, 1919Aug 1, 1922Petits Fils Francois WendelReceptacle for liquid air
US1626655 *Aug 30, 1923May 3, 1927Westinghouse Electric & Mfg CoHeat-insulating wall
US1969621 *Apr 2, 1934Aug 7, 1934Munters Carl GeorgHeat insulation
US1973880 *Jul 15, 1931Sep 18, 1934Reynolds Res CorpInsulating unit
US2104548 *Jun 27, 1936Jan 4, 1938Gen Motors CorpRefrigerating apparatus
US2159053 *Nov 29, 1935May 23, 1939Owens Corning Flberglas CorpInsulating bat
US2345204 *Apr 2, 1942Mar 28, 1944Mobile Refrigeration IncInterior chamber insulation
US2396459 *Aug 28, 1943Mar 12, 1946Linde Air Prod CoInsulated container for liquefied gases and the like
US2485647 *Oct 26, 1945Oct 25, 1949Glenn H NorquistInsulated container structure
US2513749 *May 22, 1945Jul 4, 1950Air Prod IncInsulated container and method of insulating the same
US2619804 *Dec 17, 1947Dec 2, 1952Electrolux AbRefrigerator having provisions for reducing heat transfer therein
US2643021 *May 24, 1950Jun 23, 1953Ezekiel Jacob JHeat insulating container
US2702458 *Aug 11, 1951Feb 22, 1955Douglas Aircraft Co IncIsothermal shipping container
US2759522 *Jan 19, 1954Aug 21, 1956Far Ex CorpMethod of producing a light and heat radiation reflecting, fireproof material
US2776776 *Jul 11, 1952Jan 8, 1957Gen ElectricLiquefied gas container
DE840786C *Dec 2, 1965Jun 5, 1952Ver Korkindustrie AgKaelte-Isolierung aus mehrschichtigen Kunstharzschaum-Isolierplatten
FR712042A * Title not available
GB143219A * Title not available
GB683855A * Title not available
GB715174A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3108706 *Aug 31, 1959Oct 29, 1963Union Carbide CorpApparatus for improving vacuum insulation
US3118194 *Sep 26, 1961Jan 21, 1964Service Nat Dit Gaz De FranceMethod of insulating tanks for storing or transporting low-temperature liquids
US3130561 *Nov 1, 1961Apr 28, 1964Nat Res CorpInsulation device
US3133422 *May 31, 1962May 19, 1964Union Carbide CorpInsulation construction
US3137143 *Apr 23, 1962Jun 16, 1964Gundy Donald A VanCondensing vacuum insulation
US3147878 *Sep 22, 1958Sep 8, 1964Chicago Bridge & Iron CoCryogenic storage tank
US3199715 *Jul 20, 1962Aug 10, 1965Union Carbide CorpInsulation construction
US3212320 *Feb 2, 1962Oct 19, 1965Ametek IncTensile testing cryostat
US3217504 *Sep 16, 1963Nov 16, 1965Cryogenic Eng CoGas refrigerated storage container and insulation system for such containers
US3224277 *Feb 16, 1962Dec 21, 1965Chicago Bridge & Iron CoEnvironmental apparatus
US3231451 *Nov 1, 1961Jan 25, 1966Yale Robert SRadiation barrier panels
US3238002 *Jun 26, 1963Mar 1, 1966Union Carbide CorpInsulated shipping container for biological materials
US3241702 *Nov 2, 1961Mar 22, 1966Union Carbide CorpInsulation construction for cryogenic containers
US3265236 *May 10, 1962Aug 9, 1966Union Carbide CorpThermal insulation
US3271924 *Sep 3, 1963Sep 13, 1966Great Lakes Carbon CorpMethod of insulating cryogenic substances
US3273740 *Sep 3, 1963Sep 20, 1966 Tank for liquefied natural gas and other products stored at low temperatures
US3295709 *Oct 19, 1965Jan 3, 1967Coleman CoManufactured product having vacuum retaining plastic walls
US3327778 *Apr 17, 1963Jun 27, 1967Lawrence Jr Walter FrederickLow thermal emissivity shield
US3357586 *Sep 3, 1963Dec 12, 1967Union Carbide CorpApparatus for conserving and dispensing valuable materials
US3358867 *Apr 7, 1965Dec 19, 1967Union Carbide CorpDouble-walled thermally insulated container
US3365897 *Jun 17, 1966Jan 30, 1968Nasa UsaCryogenic thermal insulation
US3367530 *Aug 29, 1963Feb 6, 1968Union Carbide CorpThermal insulating structure
US3380614 *Nov 20, 1963Apr 30, 1968L Air Liquide Sa Pour D EtudeThermal insulation under vacuum
US3390703 *Sep 30, 1966Jul 2, 1968Ryan Ind IncMultilayer insulating means
US3397720 *Oct 23, 1964Aug 20, 1968HitcoMultiple layer insulation for a cryogenic structure
US3399800 *Feb 14, 1966Sep 3, 1968Sarl Gaz TranspTank for liquefied gas
US3400849 *Apr 1, 1966Sep 10, 1968Service Nat Dit Gaz De FranceTanks for the storage and transport of cryogenic fluids
US3415408 *Sep 14, 1965Dec 10, 1968North American RockwellInsulated tank
US3481504 *Jul 5, 1968Dec 2, 1969Pittsburgh Des Moines SteelLiquid storage container
US3504820 *Nov 26, 1968Apr 7, 1970Union Carbide CorpSpaced wall receptacle having wound composite insulation between the walls
US3625896 *Jun 7, 1968Dec 7, 1971Air ReductionThermal insulating powder for low-temperature systems and methods of making same
US3695050 *May 14, 1970Oct 3, 1972Bendix CorpLiquid propellant storage tank
US3930375 *Nov 26, 1973Jan 6, 1976Linde AktiengesellschaftStorage vessel for liquefied gas
US3948295 *Apr 18, 1973Apr 6, 1976Summa CorporationInsulation system
US3967465 *Jun 27, 1974Jul 6, 1976U.S. Philips CorporationContainer for storing and transporting a liquefied gas
US4037751 *Mar 27, 1975Jul 26, 1977Summa CorporationInsulation system
US4139024 *Jan 13, 1975Feb 13, 1979General Electric CompanyThermal insulation structure
US4149388 *Apr 25, 1977Apr 17, 1979Schneider Richard NPortable cryogenic power system for pneumatically operated tools
US4168014 *Jul 21, 1977Sep 18, 1979Process Engineering, Inc.Thermal insulation system for mobile cryogenic tanks
US4287720 *Nov 21, 1979Sep 8, 1981Union Carbide CorporationCryogenic liquid container
US4340405 *Oct 29, 1980Jul 20, 1982The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of EnergyApparatus and method for maintaining low temperatures about an object at a remote location
US4692363 *Jul 22, 1986Sep 8, 1987Brown, Boveri & Cie AgThermal insulation
US4777086 *Oct 26, 1987Oct 11, 1988Owens-Corning Fiberglas CorporationLow density insulation product
US4838034 *Jul 22, 1988Jun 13, 1989International Cryogenics, Inc.Compressed-gas power source for portable gas-driven tools
US5038693 *Sep 21, 1989Aug 13, 1991The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space AdministrationComposite flexible blanket insulation
US5142842 *Dec 13, 1989Sep 1, 1992W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn.Method for making a film/foil panel
US5246759 *May 17, 1991Sep 21, 1993Messerschmitt-Bolkow-Blohm GmbhHeat insulating system
US5277959 *Aug 1, 1991Jan 11, 1994The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of National Aeronautics And Space AdministrationComposite flexible blanket insulation
US5496069 *Sep 20, 1991Mar 5, 1996Milligan; FrankHeat management shielding device
US5617900 *Jul 20, 1993Apr 8, 1997Davlyn Manufacturing Co., Inc.Multilayer flexibility resilient thermal shielding sleeves
US5811168 *Jan 19, 1996Sep 22, 1998The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space AdministrationDurable advanced flexible reusable surface insulation
US6131396 *Sep 26, 1997Oct 17, 2000Siemens AktiengesellschaftHeat radiation shield, and dewar employing same
US6467642Dec 29, 2000Oct 22, 2002Patrick L. MullensCryogenic shipping container
US6539726May 8, 2001Apr 1, 2003R. Kevin GiesyVapor plug for cryogenic storage vessels
US6651444 *Dec 27, 2000Nov 25, 2003Nisshinbo Industries, Inc.Method of deforming vacuum heat insulation material, method of fixing vacuum heat insulation material, refrigeration, cold storage vessel, and heat insulation box body
US6967051Aug 20, 2001Nov 22, 2005The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space AdministrationThermal insulation systems
US7434407 *Apr 8, 2004Oct 14, 2008Sierra Lobo, Inc.No-vent liquid hydrogen storage and delivery system
US7794805Jun 29, 2007Sep 14, 2010Schlumberger Technology CorporationThermal insulation barriers
US7921913 *Nov 1, 2005Apr 12, 2011Baker Hughes IncorporatedVacuum insulated dewar flask
US8252224May 13, 2009Aug 28, 2012Camelbak Products, LlcMethods of assembling multi-layered drink-containers
US8343097Jun 20, 2008Jan 1, 2013Hybernia Medical LlcSystems and methods for intravascular cooling
US8794476 *Oct 9, 2006Aug 5, 2014Magna Steyr Fahrzeugtechnik Ag & Co. KgOuter tank for cryogenic fuel
US8808646 *Mar 4, 2008Aug 19, 2014The Boeing CompanyWireless transmission of process data from within pressure vessels
US20020168496 *Dec 27, 2000Nov 14, 2002Kiyotake MorimotoMethod of deforming vacuum heat insulation material, method of fixing vacuum heat insulation material, refrigeration, cold storage vessel, and heat insulation box body
US20050132745 *Apr 8, 2004Jun 23, 2005Haberbusch Mark S.No-vent liquid hydrogen storage and delivery system
US20060037598 *Jun 17, 2005Feb 23, 2006Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Overheat steam cooker
US20060084332 *May 9, 2005Apr 20, 2006Linde AktiengesellschaftHeat shield
US20070095543 *Nov 1, 2005May 3, 2007Baker Hughes, IncorporatedVacuum insulated dewar flask
US20080014435 *Feb 2, 2007Jan 17, 2008Nanopore, Inc.Method for the manufacture of vacuum insulation products
US20080314050 *Aug 26, 2008Dec 25, 2008Sierra Lobo, Inc.No-vent liquid hydrogen storage and delivery system
US20090004454 *Jun 29, 2007Jan 1, 2009Christopher AumaugherThermal insulation barriers
US20090018504 *Jun 20, 2008Jan 15, 2009John Pile-SpellmanSystems and methods for intravascular cooling
US20090218353 *Oct 6, 2006Sep 3, 2009Magna Steyr Fahrzeugtechnik Ag & Co KgOuter Tank For A Cryogenic Fuel
US20090225517 *Mar 4, 2008Sep 10, 2009Nelson Karl MWireless transmission of process data from within pressure vessels
US20150300571 *Apr 16, 2015Oct 22, 2015Bayerische Motoren Werke AktiengesellschaftMethod for Producing a Tank, In Particular a Motor Vehicle Tank
USD732392Jan 17, 2014Jun 23, 2015Camelbak Products, LlcSports bottle
DE4016407C1 *May 22, 1990Oct 24, 1991Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm Gmbh, 8012 Ottobrunn, DeTitle not available
EP0178337A1 *Oct 15, 1984Apr 23, 1986Union Carbide CorporationShipping container for storing materials at cryogenic temperatures
EP0178338A1 *Oct 15, 1984Apr 23, 1986Union Carbide CorporationCryogenic storage container
EP1125078A1 *Oct 27, 1999Aug 22, 2001Mve, Inc.Vacuum insulated pipe
EP1125078A4 *Oct 27, 1999Aug 13, 2003Chart IncVacuum insulated pipe
EP1596121A1 *May 4, 2005Nov 16, 2005Linde AktiengesellschaftThermal shield
EP1628078A1 *Aug 18, 2005Feb 22, 2006Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Overheat steam cooker
EP1818595A1 *Feb 6, 2007Aug 15, 2007Nanopore, Inc.Method for the manufacture of vacuum insulation products
EP2784367B1 *Nov 19, 2012Apr 19, 2017LG Hausys, Ltd.Core member for vacuum insulation materials
EP2944858A4 *Jan 8, 2014Feb 15, 2017Kaneka CorpHeat insulating sheet, heat insulating material, heat insulating sheet manufacturing method, and heat insulating material manufacturing method
WO2000074749A1Jun 8, 2000Dec 14, 2000The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New YorkIntravascular systems for corporeal cooling
WO2016087233A1 *Nov 20, 2015Jun 9, 2016Bayerische Motoren Werke AktiengesellschaftCryogenic pressure container
U.S. Classification220/560.13, 62/48.3, 62/DIG.130, 62/54.3, 29/455.1, 165/136, 156/62.2, 29/452, 220/901, 62/DIG.100
International ClassificationF16L59/08, E04B1/76, F17C3/08, F17C13/00, A47J41/02, E04B1/80
Cooperative ClassificationE04B1/803, Y10S62/01, Y10S220/901, F17C13/001, F16L59/08, Y02B80/12, Y10S62/13, F17C3/08, A47J41/022, E04B1/76
European ClassificationE04B1/80B, F17C3/08, A47J41/02G, F17C13/00B, E04B1/76, F16L59/08