Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3021785 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateFeb 20, 1962
Filing dateMay 4, 1959
Priority dateMay 4, 1959
Publication numberUS 3021785 A, US 3021785A, US-A-3021785, US3021785 A, US3021785A
InventorsCline John C, Hradel Joseph R
Original AssigneeDow Chemical Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Counterforce initiation
US 3021785 A
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Feb. 20, 1962 J, R, HRADEL ET AL 3,021,785

COUNTERFORCE INITIATION Filed May 4, 1959 3 Sheets-Sheet 1 113456 @Mezzi Feb. 20, 1962 J. R. HRADEL EI AL 3,021,785

COUNTERFORCE INITIATION Filed May 4, 1959 Sheets-Sheet 2 E; E E; li-E.. E MWL E fm/ Feb. 20, 1962 J. R. HRADl-:L E-r Ax. 3,021,785

COUNTERFORCE INITIATION Filed May 4, 1959 3 Sheets-Sheet 3 E'MLE.'

MM5 POLYETHYLEN: LoAD coNmNER '2223" E? FA|LuRs oaToNmoNs me. l so 5 nous ne. s so s Non: no. 5 5o 5 non: ne. 7 5o s nous Fm. e 5o 5 z FIG, l |00 5 NONE.

ne. 5 loo s 2 Flo. 5 noo NONE 5 FIG. 7 lOO NONE 5 Fm. s noo nous 5 ELEJE METAL cm coNTAms BASE CHARGE '"s'lgmg" munies oaToNATnoNs Fna. 2 so 5 nous ne. 4 su 4 l nc. a so 2 5 no. a so n 4 ns. |o 5o NONE 5 ne. 2 loo 5 nous ns. 4 loo l 4 nc. s noo None s ma. a noo Nom-z s ne. no loo Nom: 5

INVENTORS BY v 47m e/ve vs United rates Filed May 4, 1959, Sex'. No. 810,649 5 Claims. (Cl. 102-24) rPhe present invention relates to devices for accomplishing the initiation of an explosion. More specifically, the invention is directed to a form of initiator in which two generally parallel strings of encased or jacketed Primacord are tired simultaneously while in controlled adjacent spacing each withthe other. Still more specifically the present invention relates to initiating devices wherein the Primacord strands are encased in a boosting sheath, where the selected sheath upgrades the initiating shock.

The initiation of explosive materialsinvolves the provision of an initiating shock of suliicient magnitude to start the complex chemical reactions in the base load of explosives so as to create a liberation of gases and heat to do work. Upon initiation the shock propagates through the contiguous mass of the base charge. Historically, gun powder was and is initiated by the use of fulminate primers and the like where simple mechanical shock on the sensitive primer load causes an initiating explosion communicating itself to the base load. Similarly fused caps or primers have been used where the heat of the fuse initiates the detonation of the primer, with the primer, imbedded, for example in a 'oase charge of explosive material such as dynamite. Similar results have been obtained in primers exploded by an electrical potential. Then Primacord or detonating fuse was developed which is essentially a continuous train of high explosive material such as trinitrotoluene encased in a protecting outer layer of reinforcing and waterproofing material. The

Primacord was then detonated by one of the primers set forth and the explosion of the Primacord is extended by very rapid propagation to the entire length of the Primacord and if the Primacord is imbedded in a matrix of base load explosives, those explosives may be detonated. More usually, the Primacord or detonating fuze is imbedded in a primer charge of relatively sensitive material, 'the latter being imbedded in an explosive mass. Detonation of the base charge presumes that the heat and shock of the Primacord is of sufficient intensity to serve the initiating function in the base charge or where the action of the Primacord is insuicient to cause detonation, either the sensitivity of the base charge must be upgraded or the magnitude of the initiating shock must be increased, the latter within reasonable limits imposed by the available strengths of Primacord.

Thus, in the shooting of relatively insensitive base loads, such-as ammonium nitrate, for example, the problem of successful initiation is vsdmewhat dicult and in the minds of some shooting experts well nigh impossible with any degree of uniform results. One successful shooting system developed is detonation employing a Munroe type let, or shaped charge, the principal axis of which is oriented to penetrate the base charge. sensitization is sometimes employed but is extremely dangerous inasmuch c 3,021,785 ICC cheaper than shaped charges while obtaining excellent` detonation action over relatively insensitive base charges.

It goes without saying that its utility therefore extendsthrough the entire range of conventional base loads, for example TNT, RDX, dynamites, composition C, oil primed ammonium nitrate, water primed ammonium nitrate, metal sensitized` explosive compositions, and the like. Collaterally, and quite unexpectedly, the invention utilizes simple means to upgrade the initiator shock so that field use is greatly expedited and uniformly good detonating results are obtained.

Thus, one object of the present invention is to provide a cheaply constructed initiator.

Another object is to provide an initiator using readily available components in simple combination.

Another object is to provide parallel lines of adjacent jacketed Primacord to upgrade the shock potential of initiation devices beyond normal expectations.

Still another object is to provide an initiating explosive,

structure which is capable 'of accomplishing uniformly good detonation in relatively insensitive explosive compositions and which can be assembled in the placewhere such materials are red and thus avoid handling explosive material altogether. Here even the base explosive is not necessarily active while the above is being carried out.

Other objects of the present invention will become ob vious to those experienced in explosives and explosive detonating techniques as the description proceeds.

General description lt is relatively wellknown in work with explosives that when two charges having substantially equal power factors are placed a distance from each other andare deto,

nated simultaneously, that shock waves emanate radially and concentrically from the situs of Ieach of the, charges and that upon collision of the two shock waves a resultant interference shock is observable of a magnitude greater than either one of the shock waves at the point of collision. The present invention makes use of this observation by providing at least a pair of adjacent strands of explosive material and securing them in adjacent spaced apart relation. In practice it has been found convenient to do this by using tubes of a suitable electrically conducting material such as metal although sheaths comprlsed of boron compounds and Celluloid have proved satisfactory. Peculiarly, excellentresults are also obtained with tubular sheaths wherein'openings or holes are provided therethrough so that the tubular encasing member may even comprise a metal mesh or'screen. Simply encasing the explosive train is observed to upgrade theA available initiating shock. When two encased spaced apart strands are detonated simultaneously, a shock result of unpredictable magnitude is available for initiation. The explosive shock which results is greatly upgraded Patented Feb. 20,1962;

beyondvthe predictable cumulative increase assuming the added strength of an additional strand. This makes this simple arrangement an excellent initiator in relatively 1nor otherwise held in abutting relationship the required initiating shock wave was available and shot failures due to"inadequate initiation force ceased. The success obtained is believed to result principally from the encasement ofthe Primacordl charge in the boosting sheath.v

The sheath may be made of conducting material or it may b e made of a higher energyfu'elsuch as magnesium, aluminum, boron compounds or leven of celluloid. Experi` mental and actual field usage indicates enhancement of initiation with simple encasement, improvement is indicated using parallel strands of'Primacord with a single strand encased, andsuperior performance was observed.

where encasement of each of parallel spaced apart Primacord vstrands Wasemployed. Experiments with non-conducting encasements showed less desirable results. The result also is in part attributed tominimizing of the space gap as between' the twoor more parallel strands of Prima` cord.. Tubular sheaths of light metal i.e. aluminum and magnesium, boron compounds, and celluloid were tested satisfactorily. Rubber, poly-vinyl chloride, tar, paper and other non-conducting materials did not show well in testing. Aluminum and magnesium encasements seemed best. lAs will be obvious to persons skilled in the art of initiating explosive materials, such an initiating device is simple to prepare, easy to use, and productive of uniform shooting in avoidance of initiating failure. Shot propagation is greatly enhanced by reason of the fact that the initiators as `herein disclosed may bemade up as long or as short as necessary.

- In the drawings:

FIGURE 1 is a schematic cross section View of a hole having a polyethylene liner, containing a base charge, a sand tamp, and using a .single strand of Primacord for attempted initiation. Consistent initiating failure occurred using this system of initiation with relatively insensitive base charges.

FIGURE 2 is a schematic cross section view showing the initiation system set out in FIGURE l but where the base charge is confined in a metal can. Consistent failure occurred in usine this system of initiation with a relatively insensitive base charge.

FIGURE 3' is a schematic cross section view of the use of an initiation systemwherein two parallel strands of vPrimacord are used in abutting adjacent relationship with both strands fired simultaneously in a base charge substantially as in FIGURE l in a polyethylene bag. Occasionaldetonation 'was accomplished using this system where Primacord. in the strength of about 100 grains per strand of Primacord encased in a metal tube and imbedded in thebase charge.' Results in terms of detonation was unsatisfactory except when Primacord of relatively high LAstrength (100 grains per foot) was used.

FIGURE 6 is a schematic cross section view showing the initiation system set forth in FIGURE 5 but where the relatively insensitive base charge was contained in a vmetal container and the tubular metal cased Primacord was imbedded inthe charge container. In both and 100 grain per foot Primacord strengths, detonation' occurred although with better consistency in the 100 grain strength.

FIGURE 7 illustrates in schematic cross section an initiator prepared from two parallel strands of Primacord tired simultaneously and in abutting adjacent relationship wherein one of the strands is encased in a tube sheath of electrically conducting material. The thus prepared initiator was imbedded in a base charge of relatively insensitive explosive material in a polyethylene bag and upon tiring the initiator structure uniform failure of deto` nation wasobserved in the 50 grain per foot strengths of Primacordand uniform success of detonation was observed when the 100 grain per foot strength of Primacord was used;

FIGURE 8 is a cross section view showing employment of the initiating system shown in FIGURE 7 except that a'metal Acontainer is used to hold the basecharge. Upon firing the initiator fairly good detonation results' were obtainedusing lower strength Primacord (50 grains per foot) and detonation was indicated in each instance where the 100 grain per foot 'Primacord was used.

FIGURE 9 is a schematic cross section view showing an initiator prepared from two parallel strands of Primacord, each contained in a tubular electrically conductive case and the cases positioned in abutting relationshipstov each other and arranged for simultaneous detonation. Using 50 grains per foot strength Primacord occasional detonation was observed where 'the relatively vinsensitive base charge material was in a polyethylene bag. VUsing 100 grains per foot strength of Primacord uniform detonation of the base charge was observed.

FIGURE 10 is a schematic cross section view showing an initiator as set forth in FIGURE 9 inserted in a base charge contained in a metal container. No failures of detonation were lobserved using this system in either the 50 or 100 grain per foot strengths of Primacord, where the base charge comprised relatively insensitive explosive material.

FIGURE 11 Yis a perspective view of an initiator structure as shown in FIGURES 9 and l() and indicating the arrangement of the tubular electrically conductive sheath enclosing eachVof the looped Primacord strands and both strands having an attached blasting cap attached to the ends thereof for simultaneous firing. The conduct-` tact with each other,

. train indicate the propagation of primary shock waves.' 'I'he arcuate lines indicate secondary or rebounding shock.

FIGURE l2 is `a perspective view of an initiator structure wherein the conducting tubular'member is of mesh or open-work construction. the initiator haveY indicated excellent detonation properties in relatively insensitive base charges, generally showing a consistent result as in the initiator shown in FIG- URE ll. l

FIGURE 13 is a partial cross section elevation through' i a structure similar to that shown in FIGURE ll indica'- ing the means for securing the` conducting tubular memv bers in abutting parallel relationship and the'attachment of a blasting cap to the Primacord lines for simultaneousv firing. It will be noticed, however, that the two strands of Primacord are not 'looped as previouslyillustrated.

FIGURE 14 is a schematic end cross sectional elevation showingV a lpair of columnar explosive` strandsl en-A cased in electrically Aconducting andl abuttingtubes. `In this illustrationV the concentric lines about the explosivewaves and their intersection on line tangential to both tubular .cases `represents a trace of a plane running.the

lengthV of the tubes andv representing a zone of shock Wavev Results using this form ofVV amplification. The possible mechanics of this amplitication are suggested.

FIGURE 15 is a chart tabulating the results of a complete shot series in polyethylene bags as set forth in FIG- URES 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 using 50 grain per foot Primacord and 100 grain per foot Primacord.

FIGURE 16 is a chart tabnlating the results of a complete shot series in metal cans or containers as set forth in FIGURES 2, 4,` 6, 8 and 10 using 50 grains per foot Primacord and 1GO grains per foot Primacord.

Specyic description While ammonium nitrate as a base explosive charge has increased in volume employed in detonation work, a uniformly successful means of accomplishing initiation of such base charges has defied engineers and others called upon to accomplish detonation. To date, the shaped charge initiation has given the best uniform results without priming or sensitizing the base charges beyond reasonable safe limits. In general, the relatively insensitive and economical nature of ammonium nitrate explosives is well recognized and has a marked safety advantage in use over more conventional organic explosives. As will be appreciated failure to accomplish initiation and consequent detonation is extremely serious in mining, quarrying and shooting operations. The use of shaped charges for initiation is often times expensive and not fully amenable to eld conditions. Shooters employing ammonium nitrate explosive compositions (using oil, water and metal additives) have explored various conventional initiating means without uniform success. The applicants have repeatedly attempted initiation by hailing or wadding Primacord in random orientation in an attempt to accompiish satisfactory initiation. Satisfactory detonation was not obtained using these methods and means. However, occasional detonation indicated that some particular orientation of the detonating means might prove promising. Primacord was selected as the medium because it is universally available and is relatively easy to work with. As will be appreciated by persons familiar in the explosives art the term Primacord has reference to a columnar contiguous train of high explosive material confined in a protectiveplastic or insulating sheath and is available from a variety of explosives supply sources. Conventionally, it is used as a fuse or an initiator. The Primacord is conventionally inserted in a base charge and the explosive train itself is initiated at a selected distance from the base charge as by means of a blasting cap and the shock of explosion propagates from the point of `initiating' the Primacord to the end of that explosive train. While this system of initiating is quite effective with dynamites, nitro-gels, nitroglycerine and the like, it is uniformly unsuccessful in initiating ammonium nitrate compositions and like materials having equally low responsiveness to initiating shock. With reference to FIGURES 1 and 2, and tabulated shot results as shown in FIGURES 15 and 16, using a 5 shot series for control, no detonation was accomplished with the selected base charge comprising a 72 percent ammonium nitrate load with 14 percent magnesium and 14 percent aluminum metalization. This was true where the base charge was contained in a polyethylene bag (FIGURE 1) and where the base charge was confined in a metal container. `These failures were again repeated even through the strength of the Primacord was doubled. p

Improved results were observed using the initiator shown in FIGURES 3 and 5 comprising parallel and abutting strands of Primacord using simultaneous initiation. The selected length of Primacord was looped, taped together and initiated with a conventional blasting cap so that firing of both strands was simultaneous. With reference to tabulated results in FIGURES 15 and 16 failures persisted in the 50 grains per foot strength of Primacord but improved at the higher `strength of 100 grains per foot and improvement was also observed where the base loads were contained in theme'tal container as set forth in FIGURE 4. It was then decided that the results might be enhanced if the Primacord strand Was jaclceted. Polyethylene sleeves were employed over the Primacord along with vinyl coverings and other tubular organic and substantially electrically non-conducting coverings with no improvement in result. Then an electrically conductive sleeve comprising a tubular thin-walled metal encasement was utilized to jacket a single strand of Primacord. Such an arrangement is illustrated in FIG- URES 5 and 6. The former was inserted in an ammonium nitrate base charge as above indicated and the latter was inserted in a metal container filled with the same base charge. No failures were observed in the shot series using the grain per foot Primacord strength with the base charge of FIGURE 5. However, detonation failure was observed in the lower strength Primacord set out in the polyethylene contained base charge although some increase in initiating power was observed. Using the metal base charge container of FIGURE 6 occasional failure of detonation was observed at the lower level strength of Primacord and uniform success was obtained when the higher strength Primacord was used (FIGURES 15 and 16). The shot series of FIGURES 5 and 6 clearly showed an unpredictable increase in detonation eiciency. Tubes of various metals, copper, steel, aluminum, magnesium, and tinned steel Wire were used successfully. A Celluloid encasement also tested satisfactorily. The so called light metals of aluminum and magnesium were preferred.

The shot series as shown in FIGURES 7 and 8 and tabulated in FIGURES 15 and 16 show a further progression in the use of a double strand of Primacord, one of the strands being encased in an electrically conducting tube and the other of the strands in parallel abutting relation thereto. In FIGURE 7, this initiator was inserted in a base charge of ammonium nitrate as employed in the others of the shot series. In FIGURE 8 the initiator was inserted in the mass of the same base charge contained in a metal container. in the FIGURE 7 arrangement no initiating success was observed at the lower strength of Prima/:ord but at the 100 grain per foot strength initiation and detonation was uniformly good. From 5 shots no failures were observed. In the FIGURE 8 arrangement, one failure in 5 attempts was noted Vat thelower strength level of Primacord and no failures occurred where the 100 grain strength of Primacord was employed. Clearly the results were better employing the higher strength of Primacord and best when the arrangement of FIGURE 8 was used wherein the base charge was in. the metal container.

Finally, the shot series illustrated in FIGURES 9 and 10 were attempted wherein two strands of Primacord (actually comprising a loop of a single strand), each encasedin thin walled electrically conducting tubing were taped into abutting parallel relationship and fired simultaneously. In FIGURE 9 this was done where the base charge of metallized ammonium nitrate was contained in a polyethylene liner. In FIGURE 10 the same base charge was placed in a metal container. Excellent detonation results were obtained. In obtaining the tabulated data metallized ammonium nitrate was used as the base charge.

The significance of this work is to show an improved initiator comprising at least a pair of adjacent lines of explosive material arranged for simultaneous detonation. Optimum performance is obtained where the strands of explosive material are each encased, or at least one of the strands is encased, in boosting material such as aluminum. In the shot series set forth in FIGURES 1-10, inclusive, and tabulated in FIGURES 15 and 16, the initiator was made up from Primacord in the two strengths indicated, and the explosive base charge comprised a liquid solution of ammonium nitrate with 14 percent magnesium and 14 percent aluminum metallization in fairly large chip form. The ammonium nitrate solution comprised 72 percent by f stock is cheaper to obtain.

weight of the basey load. One pound of base charge was employed ineach test hole in sand and 2 feet of sand tamp was applied over each of the loads. In each shot wherein the base charge was contained in the polyethylene sack, the polyethylene was uniformly used and of stock origin. The metal contrainers used in the test shots illustrated in FIGURESZ, 4, 6, 8, and 10 were number 2 tin plated cans of conventional design perforated. axially to receive the initiator structure.

With reference to FIGURE 11, the initiator 21 is shown comprising two parallel strands of Primacord 22 and 23 --and being attached to a blasting` cap 24 for simultaneous initiation.V The two strands 22 and 23 are made up by bending a single strandY of Primacord. YThe blasting cap '24 ista'ped or'clipped by means of 24 to the Primaeord strands 22 and 23 adjacent the terminalends thereof in such a manner that each of the strands 22 and 23 are substantially equal in length measuring from the position of the blasting cap Y24. The ends of the Primacord are water-proofed as by wax or other means to avoid the possible -dampening out by possi-ble water intrusion. The

ship as by tape 29 or other suitable holding means such l as wire, metal clips or the like. f

' FIG-URE l2 iliustrates a. modification of the optimum form shown in FIGURE ll. The initiator 30 comprises' parallel adjacent strands 31 and 32 of Primacord. These strands 31 and 32 are arranged so as to explode simultaneously. Initiation of the stands 31 and 32 is accomplished by a blasting cap 33 adjacent to the Upper ends of the initiator 30 and each of the strands 31 and 32 being of substantially equal length from the location of the cap 33. The terminal ends of the Primacord are waterproofed against dampening out by possible water intru- Sion. (Tape 34 securely binds the cap 33 in position. Each of the strands 31 and 32 are encased in a wire or open work electrically conducting mesh 35 and 36, and these are secured in longitudinal abutting relationship as by tape 37 or other suitable holding means such as wire, metal clips, or the like. Amazingly, this form of the int itiating structureis as effective as ,the form shown in FIGURE V1 l, and-is as easy to manufacture and the mesh initiate the cap 33.

FIGURE 13 shows a form of initiator 40 wherein parallel strands of Primacord 41 and 42 are in parallel adjacent relationship for simultaneous detonation by blasting cap 43. However, in initiator 40, both ends of the strands 41 and 42 are clipped and not looped as previously observed in FIGURES l1 and 12. Tubular electrically conducting jackets 44 and 45 are employed 'over the strands 41 Iand V42 and the jackets 44 and 45 are held lin adjacent abutting relationship by tape 46 or other suitable means. The blasting cap 43 is secured an equal distance from the conducting jackets 44 and 45 as by tape 47. All ends of the strands 41 and 42 are water`- proofed to avoid dampening out of the explosive train bythe intrusion of moisture or water. Equally good results are obtained using the initiator 40 or the initiators p illustrated in FIGURES 11 and l2, the primary difference being that the forms shown in FIGURES ll and 12 using the looped piece of Primacord are somewhat simpler to constructfand less troublesome to waterproof. Electric detonating leads 48 and 49 are connected to the cap 43. While the blasting caps illustrated in FIGURES 11, 12 and 1'3 are electric` caps it is also contemplated that fused caps, percussion caps and the like may be used in specific blasting situations. l

FIGURE 14 bestv illustrates what is believed rto occur as a consequence of utilizing parallel adjacent strands of material such as Primacord for initiators, where the Leads 38 and 39 serve to which is tangential through the point of Contact between' the tubular bodies or sheaths. This is believed to give rise to a reinforced shock wave substantially on the. plane A-A, which is further enhanced by secondary shock Waves or rebound to provide a planal zone of shock amplification as shown. Usage bears out the fact that the resultant initiating shock is in a higher order than predictable on Ythe basisY of Vtotal initiating chargel "Ille 'Y theory can be proved, for example, by placing two blocks of composition C (an explosive material) a measured distance away from each other, say three inches. If both blocks are detonated simultaneously a shock reinforcement zone in a plane midway between the two blocks is observed and is measurable. In the instance of encasing the trains of Prirnacord in a tubular boosting sheath an an additional quantum of initiating energy is obtained clearly beyond the initiation value of adjacent unjacketed Primacord strands without the use of additional explosive. The initiators herein described` are believed to makeV initiating use of both of these ndings. For example, com-V paring the results of initiation under the conditions of FIGURE 1 loading (single strand) at 50 and 100 grains strength, uniform failure of detonation is observed as against the double strand jacketed system of FIGURE 9 wherein marked improvement in initiating characteristic is shown using identical amounts of Primacord strength in the 5G grain per foot strength. Beyond the results of FIGURE l no improvement was found in random orientation of Primacord in equal strength, until, of course, an economic limit in Primacord strength was reached at which point it became questionable as to whether the base charge was the ammonium nitrate composition or the explosive material of the Primacord. FIGURE 1l devices have been twisted longitudinali without diminution of initiating force.

In actual detonation of large loads elongate initiators in accord with the present invention have been used successfully with base charges in excess of several hundred pounds. t

While Primacord has been describedl throughout the specification as the material employed in preparation of the initators` herein described, the invention also en- Compasses the loading of metal tubes, for example, with material having the explosive strength of the Primacord core and placing such tubes in parallel abutting relation-- ship for simultaneous firing. So also, the plural tubes may be integrally formed in parallel adjacent relationship wherein a thin wall separates the two parallel aflixed openings. Y

Other modifications within the skill of the art will be apparent-upon a complete digestion of the specification and such modifications are intended to be included herein limited only by the scope of they hereinafter appended K claims.

We claim: Y l. In an initiator for base charges of explosive material the combination comprising: a pair of electrically con- 9 as set forth in claim 1 wherein said encasernents are tubular in form and made from a mesh-like metal material.

3. In an initiator for base charges of explosive materials as set forth in claim 1 wherein said encasements are made of aiuminum metal in integral form. o

4. In an initiator for base charges of explosive materials as set forth in claim 1 wherein said encasements are made of aluminum metal in integral form.

5. In an initiator for base charges of explosive materials as set forth 4in claim l wherein said encasements are spiral 10 windings of wire of light metal.

References Cited in the tile of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS Harle July 13,

Morden Oct. 9,

Riley Apr. 26,

Pool June 13,

Rey Mar. 17,

FOREIGN PATENTS France Sept. 21,

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent. No. 3O21,?85 February 2Oi 1962 Joseph R., Hradel et alf.

It is hereby certified that error appears in the above numbered patent requiring correction and that the said Letters Patent should read as corrected below.

Column 6 line 2'?V strike out "wirewg column 9i line 5 for "made of aluminum metal in integral form" read thin walled open-work tubular structures Signed and sealed this 3rd day of July 1962.,

(SEAL) Attest:

ERNEST w. SWIDEB DAVID L LADD Attestng Officer Commissioner of Patents

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US927968 *Feb 4, 1908Jul 13, 1909Jean HarleFuse with double action.
US1242838 *Apr 4, 1917Oct 9, 1917Stephen Richard MordenSoot-remover.
US2468274 *Jul 29, 1944Apr 26, 1949Hercules Powder Co LtdExplosive device
US2511005 *Sep 28, 1945Jun 13, 1950Pool John EMine clearing snake
US2877708 *Jun 22, 1956Mar 17, 1959Rey Freres & Cie EtsDetonating fuse
FR1109173A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3122097 *Oct 10, 1961Feb 25, 1964Du PontNon-electric initiating assembly
US3273337 *Sep 30, 1963Sep 20, 1966Thiokol Chemical CorpLinear explosive type igniter train for rocket motor
US3320883 *Oct 18, 1965May 23, 1967Canadian Safety Fuse Company LExplosive tape
US3342131 *Jul 6, 1965Sep 19, 1967Du PontSafe-arm mechanism for explosive trains
US3654866 *Jun 18, 1970Apr 11, 1972Hercules IncMach effect in presplitting
US3941056 *Jun 18, 1974Mar 2, 1976Atlas Powder CompanyBlasting cap adapter for severing blasting circuit leads
US5069135 *Dec 7, 1989Dec 3, 1991Aktiebolaget BoforsElongate main propellant powder charges
US5747722 *Jan 11, 1996May 5, 1998The Ensign-Bickford CompanyDetonators having multiple-line input leads
U.S. Classification102/275.5
International ClassificationF42D1/00, F42D1/04
Cooperative ClassificationF42D1/04
European ClassificationF42D1/04