Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3029282 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateApr 10, 1962
Filing dateSep 2, 1959
Priority dateSep 2, 1959
Publication numberUS 3029282 A, US 3029282A, US-A-3029282, US3029282 A, US3029282A
InventorsCooper Robert S, Fon Toy Arthur Dock
Original AssigneeVictor Chemical Works
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Process for producing phenylphosphonous dichloride
US 3029282 A
Abstract  available in
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

April 10, 1962 A, D. F. ToY ETAL 3,029,232

PROCESS FOR PRODUCING PHENYLPI-IOSPHONOUS DICHLORIDE Filed Sept. 2, 1959 3 Sheets-Sheet 1 CDA/CENTRI() 7"/0/VS` 7015i TEM/DfP/QTU/Pfer .550

April 10, 1962 A. D. F. TOY ETAL 3,029,282

PROCESS FOR PRODUCING PHENYLPHOSPHONOUS DICHLORIDE Filed Sept. 2, 1959 3 Sheets-Sheet 2 April 10, 1962 A. D. F. TOY ETAL PROCESS FOR PRODUCING PHENYLPHOSPHONOUS DICHLORIDE 5 Sheets-Sheet 3 Filed Sept. 2, 1959 O 5 O 5 O sl. o

3,@29282 Patented Apr. 10, 1962 lice 3,029,232 PRCESS FR PRDUClNG PHENYLPHS PHQNUS DICHLfGRiDE Arthur Dock Fon Toy, and Robert S. Cooper, Parli Fon est, Ill., assignors to Victor Chemical Works, Chicago, lil., a corporation of Illinois Filed Sept. 2, 1959, Ser. No. 837,723 8 Claims. (Cl. 260-543) This invention relates to a new and improved process of making phenylphosphonous dichloride. Y

This appiication is a continuation in part of our pending application Serial No. 682,176, filed September 5, i957, now abandoned.

It has long been known that phenylphosphonous dichloride could be made by pyrolysis according to the following reaction:

More particularly, the above reaction was reported as early as 1873 by Michaelis, Ber. 6, 601, 816 (1873), and has been studied by a number of persons since this date. A variety of types of apparatus has been used, including red hot tubes through which the reactants were passed in vapor form and internally heated quartz tubes around which the gaseous reactants were passed. When using the above processes and various modifications thereof, the rates of reaction and product yields have never been very good. Furthermore, such processes cause the formation of a considerable amount of decomposition products. For example, these processes produce decomposition products such as free phosphorus, phosphine and various carbonaceous residues, which indicate that various side reactions take place.

In distinct contrast to the above referred to conven tional reaction for producing phenylphosphonous dichloride, we have discovered a remarkable process that greatly reduces side reactions and the formation of decomposition products, and significantly increases the rate of formation of phenylphosphonous dichloride. Briefly, our process comprises reacting phosphorus trichloride and benzene in the presence of monochiorobenzene. Experience indicates that satisfactory results may be obtained with as low as about 1 mole percent monochlorobenzene in the vapor; however, in order to obtain commercially advantageous results, at least about 2-5 mole percent monochlorobenzene should be used in the vapor.

The process encompassed by our invention provides for the reaction of PC13 and benzene at elevated temperatures in the presence of monochlorobenzene. By the use of monochlorobenzene in this process, the rate of reaction may be increased by as much as 65-70%. At the same time, the decomposition products, including free phosphorus, are decreased and the quality of the product is improved. It is very important to obviate or reduce the level of the spontaneously ignitable free phosphorus, especially with benzene in the vicinity. FIGURE 5 shows that as the percentage of chlorobenzene in the feed (PC13, CSHG, and mouochlorobenzene) increases above the zero level, the percentage of free phosphorus inthe phenylphosphonous dichloride product correspondingly decreases. The level or" phosphorus in the product shown in FIGURE 5 was determined by once distilling the product.

The exact mechanism by which the added monochlorobenzene improves the reaction rate is not known. It does not appear to be catalytic since increasing the amount of monochiorobenzene in the reacting vapors continues to increase the reaction rate even up to a level of approximately 30-35 mole percent monochlorobenzene.

To illustrate the process of this invention reference s made to the accompanying drawings wherein FIGURES l and 2 are front nad side views, respectively, of apparatus used to prepare phenylphosphonous dichloride.

Referring to the use of the apparatus: shown in FIG- URES 1 and 2, a mixture of phosphorus trichloride, benzene and monochlorobenzene is first charged into ask il) which is heated by cup-shaped heater 15 so that the liquid is continually refluxing. The temperature of the charge in the flask 1t] is determined by the thermometer 18 which is positioned in the well 19. The vapors rise to reaction tube 12 which is heated by a heating unit such as the electric coil 13. After passing through the reaction iiask il, the vapors are condensed in condenser 1d and flow back down the side of ask 11 into flask 10. An atmosphere of dry nitrogen is provided through entrance tube 16, and HC1 and by-product noncondensibles are removed through tube 17.

Ordinary Pyrex glass is used for this equipment with the exception of the reaction tube 12 which is preferably made of fused silica. Various corrosion-resistant metals such as stainless steels, Hastelloys, Inconels and nickel may also be used but are not generally as satisfactory as fused silica. The temperature of the reaction tube 12 is controlled bythe current input after the tube has been calibrated by using a thermocouple pressed against the silica tube. Other means of temperature control, such as an optical pyrometer, may also be satisfactorily used.

The progress of the reaction is followed by the rise in boiling point of the liquid in flask 10. As the concentration of the product phenylphosphonous dichloride (B.P., 224.6 C.) increases in the flask, the temperature slowly rises. The reaction rates referred to below, however, were calculatedl by recovering the product (i.e., phenylphosphonous dichloride) from the reactants and dividing this yield in grams by the number of hours dura tion of the run. This is illustrated in the example.

The raw materials suitable for use in our process are ordinary commercially available products. The benzene and chlorobenzene should be essentially anhydrous. If water is present in the commercially available products, they should be topped by distillation to remove the water.

The proportions of the reactants employed may be varied over a wide range. We have found, for example, that when only benzene and PCl3 are reacted, the molar of ratio PCl3 to benzene in the vapor may be varied from about 6:1 to 0.25 :1. The preferred proportion is a ratio of PG13 to benzene of about 2:1, which corresponds to one chlorine atom for each hydrogen atom.

vWhen monochlorobenzene is added to this reaction mixture the ratio of PG13 to total aromatics (benzene plus chlorobenzene) shifts somewhat. The preferred molal vapor ratio in this case is more nearly between 1:1a11d 111.5.

engagea The amount of monochlorobenzene used may run as high as 30 to 35 mole percent of the entire vapor mixture. Thus, when the above mentioned ratios of PG13 to total aromatics are used, the monochlorobenzene present may be equivalent or in some cases even greater than the amount of benzene used. A preferred reaction vapor mixture for the process of this invention comprises approximately 40 mole percent PG13, 25 to 30 mole percent benzene, and '35 to 30 mole percent monochlorobenzene.

The following example illustrates the process of our invention.

EXAMPLE 137.4 gm. (1.0 mole) of phosphorus trichloride, 93.3 gm. (1.194 moles) of benzene, and 337.7 gm. (3.0 moles) of monochlorobenzene Were charged into the boiling tlasl; 10 equipped at shown in FTGURE l. These quantities were calculated to give molal vapor concentrations o 39.1% PG13, 37.9% benzene and 23.0% chlorobenzene at aboiling point of approximately 100 C. The heating units were then turned on and the temperature of the reaction tube (fused silica) was raised to approximately 550 C. vThe vapors were allowed to retlux through the reaction llask 11 for 3.7 hours during which time the boiling point of the liquid rose from 100.7" G. to 107.0 C. 555.7 gm. of clear, dark amber reaction product was recovered; this product was distilled through a 14- inch Vigreux column. 505.6 gm. of low boiling reactants and 42.0 gm. of phenylphosphonous dichloride were recovered. This gives a rate of formation of 11.34 gm./hr. A percentage yield was calculated as follows:

568.4 gm. reactants charged 505.6 gm. reactants recovered reactants Consumed.

42.0 gm. product and 8.6 gm. equivalent HC1 produced 62.8 X 100%=80.5% yield Analysis Theory P percent.. 21. 1 21. 8 Total chlorine. do 0.2 Chloride ion d 0. 1 Molecular Weight by 145. 0 142.1

Further, FIGURE 3 shows that the use of 5, l0, 20 and 30 mole percent monochlorobenzene in the vapor increases the rate of formation of phenylphosphonour dichloride, as compared with zero mole percent chlorobenzene. It can be seen from these data that it no monochlorobenzene is used, the rate of formation reaches a maximum at approximately 33% aromatics, i.e., a PG13 to benzene mole ratio of approximately 2:1 in the vapor.

FIGURE 3 is not intended to illustrate the total attainable rate Vof producing phenylphosphonous dichloride, but is intended to show the relative rates of phenylphos- .phonous dichloride produced with and without the use of monochlorobenzene using the same apparatus and reaction conditions. Large scale plant production and experience have shown that similar results are obtained when hundreds of pounds of phenylphosphonous dichloride are produced per day.

The data used in preparing FIGURE 3 were primarily obtained from a series of fourteen experiments, all of which were conducted in the same `apparatus under conditions as nearly identical as possible. These data are shown in Table I, infra.v

Table I RATE OF FORMATION 0F PHENYLPHOSPHONOUS DICHLORIDE AT VARIOUS CHLOROBENZENE CON- CENTRATIONS vs. MOL PERCENT AROMATICS (BEN- ZENE-i-CHLOROBENZENE) IN VAPOR AT 550 C.

Mol Mol Mol Rate of Forpereent percent percent mation or Ghloro- Benzene Aromatics Phcnylphosbenzene in in Vapor in Vapor phonous Vapor Dichloride, Qms/Hr.

5 47. O 52. 0 8. 3 5 27. 5 31.5 8. 6 5 59.0 04. 0 4. 3 10 44. 5 54. 5 10. 0 10 24. 8 34. 8 9. 8 10 56. 0 65. 0 4. 4 l5 42. 0 57.0 10. 9 l5 23. 5 38. 5 10.5 15 53. 0 68. 0 4. 6 20 39. 3 59.3 11.5 20 22.0 42. 0 11.0 25 37. 0 62. 0 11. 9 25 21.0 46.0 11.2 30 34. 5 64. 5 12.1

The reaction rates in Table 1I, supra, were deter-mined by recovering the phenylphosphonous dichloride from the reactants and dividing this yield (in grams) by the number of hours duration of the reaction or run. A steady rate of reaction was evidenced by a continued rise in the boiling point of the reaction mixture during the experiment.

The curve shown in FIGURE 3 that represents 0% chlorobenzene had been previously derived from a long series of experiments during which reaction temperatures and reactant ratios had been systematically varied over Wide ranges. This curve thus represents a suitable base line for comparing the results of the chlorobenzene addition data referred to in Table I, supra.

Table I, supra, and FIGURE 3, together, clearly show that if no monochlorobenzene is used, the rate of formation of phenylphosphonous dichloride reaches a maximum at approximately 33% aromatics, i.e., a PG13 to benzene mole ratio of approximately V2:1 in the vapor. It can also be readily observed that by adding chlorobenzeneV to the reacting vapors the rate of formation steadily increases to a value approximately 1.7 times the maximum levels heretofore obtained using only benzene. lt is also apparent that' as the PG13 to total aromatics ratio becomes greater than 2 to l (i.e., less than 33% total aromatics), the addition of monochlorobenzene is of decreasing value. Thus, it is in the PG13 to aromatics ratio range or2 to l down to about 0.25 to 1 (80% aromatics) that the addition of monochlorobenzene to the reaction mixture is most valuable. There is apparently no precise upper limit to the amount of monochlorobenzene which may be used to increase reaction rate. As the amount of monochlorobenzene used is increased above the preferred range of 30v35% (based on total vapors in the reaction mixture) monochlorobenzene, the reaction rate continues to increase but side reactions appear to take place which produce high boiling materials and reduce the yield of phenylphosphonous dichloride.

A run was made at 560 C. in which the rate of formation ofphenylphosphonous dichloride was determined While using various concentrations of benzene in the vapor. These data are shown in Table Il below and are graphed in FIGURE 4.

Table 11 PREPARATION OF PHENYLPHOSPHONOUS DICHLORIDE AT 560 C.

From the data shown in FIGURE 4, a family of curves were calculated and are identified by the 540 C. and 520 C. dotted lines in FIGURE 4, which give the maximum rate of formation of phenylphosphonous dichloride at a given temperature for a given mol fraction of benzene in the vapor. This information was then used to provide the data for the 0% monochlorobenzene which is in eiect the base line of FIGURE 3. It .can be readily seen that the base line of FIGURE 3 of the application corresponds to a curve similar to FIGURE 4, but is slightly flattened due to a reduction in the vertical scale.

It should be noted that in the preceding discussion of FIGURE 3, molal vapor ratios have been used. As indicated in the example, when ask 3.0 is used as a batch reboiling ask the liquid composition is considerably different from the vapor concentration due to the diierent vapor pressures of the reactants. This fact of course must be taken into account when making up reaction charges. Our invention, however, also includes a continuous process using the same improved process.

When using a continuous process, flask is simply used as a ash evaporator. The liquid fed to iiask 10 is of the desired molal Vapor concentration and is fed continuously and is totally evaporated. In this case, the liquid product from condenser 14 is simply conducted to a separate collection ask. In order to make the process completely continuous this collecting flask may be equipped with an efficient fractionating column which holds the phenylphosphonous dichloride in the flask and allows the low boiling material to return to the flask evaporator. It can easily be seen that the improved reaction rate caused by the presence of monochlorobenzene is present in either case.

The temperature range over which our reaction takes place is quite broad. We have indications that some reaction begins to take place as low as 350 C. We have also used temperatures as high as 890 C. Without encountering excessive decomposition. Temperatures in this range are ditiicult to measure accurately and probably indicate the tube surface temperature rather than the temperature of the gases. However, it is thought that the reaction takes place primarily at the surface of the tube, consequently the actual reaction temperature is probably close to the actual tube temperature. Thus, the upper limit of the temperature range is more nearly dependent upon materials of construction than on the reaction mechanism. We have obtained our best results at temperatures in the range of 450 C. to 750 C.

The phenylphosphonous dichloride produced by our new process is a valuable chemical intermediate having many uses. It may be oxidized to benzenephosphorus oxydichloride in accordance with the process of U.S. Patent No. 2,482,810. This latter compound in turn may be used to make the plasticizers of US. Patent No. 2,471,483 and the resins of U.S. Patent No. 2,425,765. These resins in turn may be made into the copolymers of U.S. Patents Nos. 2,497,637; 2,453,167; 2,453,168; 2,583,810 and 2,586,885. Many other uses for this intermediate are well known in the art.

The foregoing detailed description has been given for clearness of understanding only, and no unnecessary limitations should be understood therefrom, as modifications will be obvious to those skilled in the art.

We claim:

l. A process for producing phenylphosphonous dichloride wich comprises reacting at at least about 350 C. an admixture of phosphorus trichloride and benzene in the presence of monochlorobenzene.

2. The process of claim l wherein the reaction temperature is about 450-750 C.

3. A process for producing phenylphosphonous dichloride which comprises reacting a vapor mixture of phosphorus trichloride, benzene and monochlorobenzene, said monochlorobenzene being present in an amount of at least about 1 mole percent, at a temperature of at least about 350 C., and recovering phenylphosphonous dichloride from the reaction product.

4. The process of claim 3 wherein the vapor mixture contains at least about 2 mole percent monochlorobenzene.

5. The process of claim 3 wherein the reaction temperature is about 450-750 C.

6. A process for producing phenylphosphonous dichloride, which comprises reacting phosphorus trichloride and benzene in a mole ratio of phosphorus trichloride to benzene of about 6:1 to 025:1 at temperatures of at least about 350 C. in the presence of monochlorobenzene.

7. A process for producing phenylphosphonous di- Chloride, which comprises reacting phosphorus trichloride and benzene in a mole ratio of about 6:1 to 025:1, respectively, at a temperature of at least about 350 C. in the presence of about 30-35 mole percent monochiorobenzene, and recovering phenylphosphonous dichloride from the reaction product.

S. A process for producing phenylphosphonous dichloride, which comprises reacting a vapor mixture of about 40 mole percent phosphorus trichloride and about 25-30 mole percent benzene in the presence of about 30-35 mole percent monochlorobenzene at a temperature of at least about 350 C., and recovering phenylphosphonous dichloride from the reaction product.

No references cited.

UNITED STATES PATENT oEEIcE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No. 3,029,282

April l0, 1962 Arthur Dock Fon Toy et al.

It is hereby certified that error appears in the above numbered patent requiring correction and that the said Letters corrected below.

Patent should read as Column 2, line 17, for

column 3, line 63, for "phcnylphosphonour" Table Il phenylphosphonous column 5, ding to the third column thereof, for "CtH5PCl2" read CHPCl2 column 6, line 23, for' "wich" read which Signed and sealed this 14th day of August 1962. SEAL) lttcst:

ENEST w. swIDER DAVID L LADD nesting Officer Commissioner of Patents

Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1 *None
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3954859 *Oct 29, 1974May 4, 1976Mobil Oil CorporationPreparation of phosphine chlorides
US4409152 *Sep 30, 1981Oct 11, 1983Stauffer Chemical CompanyContinuous high pressure process for preparing phenylphosphonous dichloride
US4521346 *Apr 29, 1983Jun 4, 1985Hoechst AktiengesellschaftProcess for preparing chlorodiphenylphosphane
US4737317 *Dec 27, 1983Apr 12, 1988Monsanto CompanyProcess for preparing phenyldichlorophosphine
US4857238 *Jul 28, 1988Aug 15, 1989Nippon Chemical Industrial Co., Ltd.Manufacturing method for alkyldihalogenophosphines
US5698736 *Jan 31, 1997Dec 16, 1997Akzo Nobel NvHigh temperature, catalytic Friedel-Crafts synthesis of benzene phosphorus dichloride
EP0050841A1 *Oct 22, 1981May 5, 1982Stauffer Chemical CompanyFluid bed process for preparing phenylphosphonous dichloride
Classifications
U.S. Classification562/820, 987/126, 422/199
International ClassificationC07F9/52, C07F9/00
Cooperative ClassificationC07F9/52
European ClassificationC07F9/52