Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3063375 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateNov 13, 1962
Filing dateMay 19, 1960
Priority dateMay 19, 1960
Publication numberUS 3063375 A, US 3063375A, US-A-3063375, US3063375 A, US3063375A
InventorsHawley Wilbur W, Haykin Jr David J
Original AssigneeHawley Wilbur W, Haykin Jr David J
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Folding fin
US 3063375 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Nov. 13, 1962 w. w. HAWLEY EI'AL 3,

FOLDING FIN Filed May 19, 1960 3 Sheets-Sheet 1 WILBUR W. HAWLEY DAVID J. HAYKIN,Jr.

ATTORNEYS Nov. 13, 1962 w. w. HAWLEY EIAL 3,063,375

VFOLDING FIN Filed May 19, 1960 3 Sheets-Sheet 2 WILBUR W. HAWLEY DAVID J. HAYKIN, Jr.

\ ATTORNEYS Nov. 13, 1962 w. w. HAWLEY ETAL 3,0 3,3 5

FOLDING FIN Filed May 19, 1960 3 Sheets-Sheet 3 WILBUR W. HAWLEY DAVID J HAYKIN, Jr

INVENTORS ATTORNEY United States Patent ()1 States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy Filed May 19, 1960, Ser. No. 30,393 3 Claims. (Cl. 102--50) The present invention relates to folding fins for booster rockets and the like. More particularly, it relates to a fin folding arrangement wherein the fin axis or span extends parallel to the airframe longitudinal axis in a collapsed condition and is erected principally by a rotary movement.

Prior folding fins comprise either a telescoping arrangement or a single hinge joint which may be located at the fin root or at some point along the fin span. Telescoping fins are generally unsatisfactory if subjected to extremely high aerodynamic loads such as are encountered in transonic and supersonic flight. Hinged fins do not greatly reduce the stowage space if the fin span exceeds the diameter of the missile. The present invention, however, is capable of reducing the required stowage area practically to the area of a square circumscribing the missile cross section even though the fin span may be'considerably greater than the length of one side of the circumscribing square.

Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a missile structure having collapsible wings or fins.

It is a further object to provide a missile structure in which the fins are collapsed at all times during stowing or handling and are erected only upon launching the missile.

Another object of the invention is to provide a folded fin missile structure in which a large part of the force required to erect the fin is supplied by setback upon launching the missile.

Other objects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will be readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the present invention showing its application to the booster rocket of a missilecombination, the fins being shown in fully folded positions;

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the fin mounting portion of the booster rocket of FIG. 1 showing the fins shortly after initiation of the erecting operation;

FIG. 3 is a view similar to FIG. 2 except that the fins appear in medial positions;

FIG. 4 is similar to FIG. 3 except that the fins have progressed very nearly to their final extended positions;

FIG. 5 is a rear view of the booster with the fins shown in the positions of FIG. 4;

FIG. 6 is a perspective of the rear portion of the booster rocket showing the fins in fully erect positions;

FIG. 7 is a plan view of the rear portion of the booster showing certain elements of the fin erecting mechanism in phantom; and

FIG. 8 is a partial sectional view taken along the line 8--8 of FIG. 7.

FIG. 1 illustrates the invention as applied to a jettisonable booster rocket 10 similar to those commonly employed in launching a large variety of guided missiles. The rocket 10 is supported on a launcher rail 12 by means of shoes 13 and 13'. A missile 14 is detachably secured to the forward end of rocket 10. The missile 14 is designed for supersonic operation and hence requires a wing of only a small span to deliver the necessary control moments and lift. The booster rocket however is needed only during the subsonic and transonic portions of the missiles 3,063,375 Patented Nov.'13., 1962 ice flight. Once the missile has reached a supersonic speed the booter is jettisoned, reducing both the drag and the weight which would otherwise need to be transported by the missile. Because of the greater span, the booster fins create a more severestorage and handling problem than do the missile fins. For this reason the invention is illustrated and described as being applied only to the booster although obviously it may be applied to the missile fins if desired.

The four booster fins 15 are folded forwardly with their span axis paralleling the booster longitudinal axis and with one surface of'the fin tangent to the body of the booster 1d. The root edge 16 of each fin 15 faces aft. The launching shoe 13' is secured to the root edge of the upper fin 15 and for aerodynamic balance a similar shoe may be secured to the lower fin. A skewed actuating rod 18 extends from the interior of the rear portion of booster 10 to the fin root edge 16, to which it is rigidly secured, as by welding. The rod 18 serves both to erect the fin and to secure it either in a folded or an erected position. A simple rotary motion of the rod 18 causes the attached fin to rotate so that the forward tip 19 of the fin moves both outwardly and towards the rear while the fin root 16 rotates from a position transverse to the longitudinal axis of the booster to a position paralleling the booster longitudinal axis.

FIGS. 2, 3 and 4 illustrate the effect of rotating rod 13. In FIG. 2, at the commencement of the erection operation, the fin tip 19 is displaced aft and outwardly from the position shown in FIG. 1. FIG. 3 shows the position of the fins after motion has proceeded to a more advanced stage. Further rotation of actuating rod 13, from the position of FIG. 3, through a total of from the position of FIG. 1, produces the condition shown in FIGS. 4 and 5. The fins 15 are fully erect, but are off-set from the missile center line with the root 16 slightly elevated above the booster body. The off-set is removed, and the fins 15 are lowered into proper alignment as shown in FIG. 6, simply by retracting actuating rod 18.

The fin actuating mechanism is shown in FIGS. 7 and 8. It should be understood that a large contribution to the actuating force is supplied by the booster set-back forces, since acceleration supplied by the booster thrust is commonly in the neighborhood of 15 g. Therefore, the primary function of the actuating mechanism is to move the fins into a slightly unbalanced condition whereafter the inertia of the fins will account for the major portion of the force needed to complete the operation.

The rear portion of the booster includes a nozzle 21, best seen in FIG. 7, shrouded by the booster skin 22. The actuating mechanism is enclosed within the space provided by the constriction of the nozzle throat and includes .four actuating cylinders 23, only one of which is shown. Cylinder 23 is pivotally secured to a boss 24 cast on the outer surface of nozzle 21. The hydraulic pressure line connections to cylinder 23 are not shown but it will be understood that a suitable source of hydraulic power is made available to cylinder 2-3. The piston rod 25 of cylinder 23 is pivotally connected to a bell crank 26. The lower end of rod 18 is splined, as seen at 27 in FIG. 8, and crank 26 is provided with teeth so that rod 18 is constrained to rotate with crank 26 but is free to move axially. Rod 18 passes through a guide bushing 28 secured internally of the booster. The bushing 28 is provided with a slot 31 through which extends a guide pin 32 secured to rod 18. A compression spring 33 is fitted over the end of rod 18 and held in place by a cap 34 fixed to the end of rod 18. Spring 33 bears against crank 26 and imparts a thrust to rod 18 urging the rod to retract into the booster. Initially, rod 18 is prevented from retraction by pin 32 riding the portion of slot 31 which extends partially about the circumference of bushing 28. When the piston rod of cylinder 23 has been extended sufliciently to drive crank 26 through 120 and hence to rotate rod 18 an equal amount, pin 3-2 will have travelled to the portion of slot 31 extending along the axis of bushing 28. The thrust of spring 33, then unresisted, causes rod 18 to withdraw into the booster. The splined connection of crank 26 to rod 18 also permits this desired motion to occur without interference.

FIGS. 7 and 8 illustrate the relative positions of the elements of the actuating mechanism when the fins are in the folded condition of FIG. 1. The fins are retained in this folded position so long as the piston rod 25 does not move. When it is desired to erect the fins pressurized fluid is brought to act upon the piston rod, causing it to move from its initial position. During the erection operation shown progressively in FIGS. 2, 3 and 4, the piston rod 25 extends, crank 26 rotates and pin 32 travels the length of the circumferential portion of slot 31. At this stage, the fins are in the position of FIGS. 4 and 5. Finally, pin 32, having arrived at the axially extending portion of slot 31, allows spring 33 to retract rod 18 and move the fins from the position of FIGS. 4 and to the position of FIG. 6. A recessed portion 35 of the booster receives the launching shoe 13' as the fin is drawn into its final erect position and thus fairs the booster surface for the reduction of drag.

As best seen in FIG. 7, a portion 36 of the root of fin is cut away so that the leading edge of the fin will not strike the booster body when the fins are approximately in the position of FIG. 3. An island 41, best seen in FIGS. 3 and 4 and shaped similarly to the cut-away portion 36, is built up from the booster body to provide a smooth fairing of the fin into the booster body. The island structures 41 may be provided with a suitable mechanism for latching the erected fins in place, although the restraint provided by the actuating mechanism is sufiicient for many applications.

Obviously, many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in the light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.

What is claimed is:

1. A collapsible wing arrangement for aerial vehicles, including a vehicle body of generally cylindrical form, a planiform airfoil having a root edge and a tip edge opposite said root edge, said airfoil being normally carried edgewise to the airstream with said root edge secured to said body, a shaft rigidly secured to said root edge oblique to the plane of said airfoil and extending into said vehicle body oblique to a plane perpendicular to the longitudinal axis thereof, said shaft being mounted within said body for rotational and axial shifting movement and being so disposed relative to said two planes that rotation thereof will move said airfoil from a collapsed position, wherein the plane of said airfoil is tangent to the vehicle body with said tip ahead of said root edge along the line of travel of the vehicle, to a position wherein the airfoil is edgewise to the airstream with the root edge thereof spaced from said body and with the plane thereof laterally offset from and parallel to a plane including the longitudinal axis of said body, means for rotating said shaft, and means for axially retracting said shaft into said body to thereby shift the plane of said airfoil into said last mentioned plane.

2. A collapsible wing arrangement as recited in claim 1, wherein said means for rotating said shaft includes a bell crank connected to said shaft and a hydraulic piston connected between said bell crank and said vehicle body, said bell crank being so connected with said shaft that the latter is constrained to rotate with said crank but is free to shift axially, and wherein said last mentioned means includes a cap afiixed to the free end of said shaft and a resilient means compressed between said cap and said bell crank.

3. A folded fin configuration for booster rockets and the like, comprising a rocket body, a stabilizing airfoil generally planiform and normally carried edgewise to the airstream with its root end secured to said body, a rotatable shaft extending from the interior of said body askew to a plane perpendicular to the longitudinal axis thereof and oblique to the plane of said airfoil, said shaft being rigidly secured to the root end of said airfoil for rotating said airfoil from a first position, wherein said airfoil is carried tangent to said body and extends longitudinally therewith, to a second position, wherein said airfoil is presented edgewise to the direction of the airstream with the root end thereof adjacent said body, means for rotating said shaft, and means for retracting said shaft to translate the position of said #airfoil into a plane containing the longitudinal axis of said body.

References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,166,879 Alard Jan. 4, 1916 2,427,217 Lebherz et al. Sept. 9, 1947 2,940,688 Bland June 14, 1960

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1166879 *Jan 27, 1914Jan 4, 1916Louis AlardApparatus for modifying the trajectory of a projectile.
US2427217 *Sep 23, 1943Sep 9, 1947Lebherz Harry JRocket fin assembly
US2940688 *Aug 27, 1956Jun 14, 1960Edward F BlandRoadable aircraft and sailboat
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3115059 *Jun 14, 1961Dec 24, 1963Moul Jr George ERetractable launching shoes
US3127838 *Sep 18, 1961Apr 7, 1964Bombrini Parodi Delfino SpaRetractable blade tail unit for projectiles
US3153980 *Aug 7, 1961Oct 27, 1964Sverre KongelbeckRetractable missile shoes
US3195406 *Oct 23, 1962Jul 20, 1965Value Engineering CompanyRotating missile launching shoe
US3782668 *Sep 25, 1970Jan 1, 1974Us ArmyRamp forward of control fin
US3921498 *May 24, 1974Nov 25, 1975Us NavyFin clip and connector mount
US4072107 *Jun 7, 1967Feb 7, 1978The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The ArmyMissile control means
US4295617 *Oct 2, 1979Oct 20, 1981The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The ArmySelectable drag brakes for rocket range control
US4323208 *Feb 1, 1980Apr 6, 1982British AerospaceFolding fins
US4410151 *Aug 28, 1980Oct 18, 1983Vereinigte Flugtechnische Werke-Fokker GmbhUnmanned craft
US4480806 *Nov 8, 1982Nov 6, 1984Stencel Aero Engineering CorporationEjection seat stabilization apparatus
US4546940 *Sep 25, 1980Oct 15, 1985Kurt AnderssonProjectile, adapted to be given a rotation on firing, which makes the projectile spin-stabilized
US4664339 *Oct 11, 1984May 12, 1987The Boeing CompanyMissile appendage deployment mechanism
US4667899 *Nov 28, 1984May 26, 1987General Dynamics, Pomona DivisionDouble swing wing self-erecting missile wing structure
US4691880 *Nov 14, 1985Sep 8, 1987Grumman Aerospace CorporationTorsion spring powered missile wing deployment system
US4717093 *Aug 12, 1985Jan 5, 1988Grumman Aerospace CorporationPenguin missile folding wing configuration
US4826105 *Feb 8, 1988May 2, 1989Rockwell International CorporationMissile fin unfolding device
US4869442 *Sep 2, 1988Sep 26, 1989Aerojet-General CorporationSelf-deploying airfoil
US4884766 *May 25, 1988Dec 5, 1989The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air ForceAutomatic fin deployment mechanism
US5108051 *Nov 22, 1988Apr 28, 1992L'etat Francais Represente Par Le Delegue General Pour L'armementDeployment mechanism of a projectile fin
US5154370 *Jul 15, 1991Oct 13, 1992The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air ForceHigh lift/low drag wing and missile airframe
US5188557 *Jan 13, 1992Feb 23, 1993Brown Randall LToy rocket apparatus
US5192037 *Aug 23, 1991Mar 9, 1993Mcdonnell Douglas CorporationDouble-pivoting deployment system for aerosurfaces
US5326049 *Jan 11, 1993Jul 5, 1994State Of Israel - Ministry Of Defense Rafael-Armament Development AuthorityDevice including a body having folded appendage to be deployed upon acceleration
US5480111 *May 13, 1994Jan 2, 1996Hughes Missile Systems CompanyMissile with deployable control fins
US5582364 *Nov 7, 1991Dec 10, 1996Hughes Missile Systems CompanyTin-erector apparatus
US7059561 *Sep 28, 2004Jun 13, 2006Giat IndustriesDeployment device for a fin
US7185846 *Mar 6, 2006Mar 6, 2007The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The ArmyAsymmetrical control surface system for tube-launched air vehicles
US7642492 *Jan 26, 2005Jan 5, 2010Raytheon CompanySingle-axis fin deployment system
US8324545 *Oct 27, 2011Dec 4, 2012Elbit Systems Ltd.Foldable and deployable panel
US8378278 *Feb 23, 2009Feb 19, 2013Elbit Systems Ltd.Foldable and deployable panel
US8590831 *Feb 8, 2011Nov 26, 2013Sergey Nikolaevich AfanasyevFlying vehicle
US8816261 *Jun 29, 2011Aug 26, 2014Raytheon CompanyBang-bang control using tangentially mounted surfaces
US8933383 *Sep 1, 2010Jan 13, 2015The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The ArmyMethod and apparatus for correcting the trajectory of a fin-stabilized, ballistic projectile using canards
US20100314488 *Feb 23, 2009Dec 16, 2010Arie AshkenaziFoldable and deployable panel
US20110127384 *Feb 8, 2011Jun 2, 2011Sergey Nikolaevich AfanasyevFlying vehicle
US20120036779 *Oct 27, 2011Feb 16, 2012Elbit Systems Ltd.Foldable and deployable panel
US20120199698 *Sep 6, 2011Aug 9, 2012Cranfield Aerospace LtdUnmanned air vehicle (uav), control system and method
DE2935044A1 *Aug 30, 1979Mar 19, 1981Ver Flugtechnische WerkeUnbemannter, aus einem transportbehaelter zu startender flugkoerper
WO1981000908A1 *Sep 25, 1980Apr 2, 1981K AnderssonProjectile,adapted to be given a rotation on firing,which makes the projectile spin-stabilized
WO1988005898A1 *Feb 1, 1988Aug 11, 1988Rheinmetall GmbhFinned projectile or missile
WO1995031689A1 *May 11, 1995Nov 23, 1995Hughes Aircraft CoMissile with deployable control fins
WO2006081226A1 *Jan 23, 2006Aug 3, 2006Raytheon CoSingle-axis fin deployment system
U.S. Classification244/3.27, 244/3.29, 244/3.28, 244/49, 89/1.819
International ClassificationF42B10/14, F42B10/00
Cooperative ClassificationF42B10/14
European ClassificationF42B10/14