Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3067611 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateDec 11, 1962
Filing dateNov 9, 1959
Priority dateNov 9, 1959
Publication numberUS 3067611 A, US 3067611A, US-A-3067611, US3067611 A, US3067611A
InventorsKenneth Bowers, Vincelett Philip S
Original AssigneeGen Dynamics Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Flow metering apparatus
US 3067611 A
Abstract  available in
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

11, 1962 K. BOWERS a-rm.

FLOW METERING APPARATUS Filed Nov. 9. 1959 RECORDER INVENTORS KENNETH BOWERS PHILIP S. VINCELETT ATTORNEY States The present invention generally relates to fluid flow metering apparatus, and more particularly relates to an elbow type flow metering apparatus which utilizes the fluid pressure difference produced transversely across an elbow member by a fluid flowing longitudinally through the elbow.

Somewhat more conventional flow metering devices are venturi tube and orifice type devices. These devices, however, produce a considerable pressure drop in any system in which they are used, thus obstructing the flow of fluid through the system. Further, these more conventional metering devices are precluded from use in many areas because of their bulk and weight.

In contrast, the present invention does not obstruct the flow of fluid or otherwise cause any appreciable pressure drop in a fluid flow system. The present invention is also relatively small in bulk and light in weight, thus being ideally suited for use with missiles and aircraft. One particular application for the present invention is the determination of the weight of gaseous oxygen which boils otf liquid oxygen during tanking operations. While missile or aircraft tanks are being filled with liquid oxygen, an appreciable amount of the liquid oxygen is lost through evaporation, or boil off. As a consequence, the amount of liquid oxygen finally stored in the missile or aircraft tank is not the same as that amount which was pumped from the reservoir or source into the tank. The present invention has been used to accurately measure the weight of the liquid oxygen lost by evaporation. In so doing it also serves as a portion of a vent for the escaping gaseous oxygen. As such a vent it does not impose flow restrictions that would be imposed by venturi tube or orifice type metering devices. This characteristic is of considerable importance since tanking rates presently achieved are in the order of many thousands of gallons per minute, and a restricting gas vent could often result in harmful pressure build-ups in the tank.

Thus it can b seen why one object of the present invention is to provide a means for accurately measuring fluid flow.

Another object is to provide a means for accurately measuring weight of fluid flow.

Another object is to provide a means for accurately measuring fluid flow and weight of fluid flow without imposing any appreciable fluid flow restriction.

Another object is to provide a lightweight apparatus for accurately measuring fluid flow and weight of fluid flow without imposing any appreciable fluid flow restriction.

And still other objects and features of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following specification and appended drawings wherein is illustrated a preferred form of the invention, and in which:

FIGURE 1 is a cross-sectional view of an elbow type duct member with pressure and temperature taps affixed thereto; and

FIGURE 2 is a schematic diagram of the present invention showing the utilization of the duct member of FIGURE 1.

Reference to FIGURE 1 shows an elbow duct member designated by the numeral 10, which duct member is atent ice relatively thin-walled and lightweight. Duct member 10 is cylindrical in cross section and has an exterior surface 11 and smooth inner surface 12. Duct member 10 also has an entrance end 13 and outlet end 14 through which fluid enters and exits respectively. Annular flanges 15 and 16 are fixed about ends 13 and 14 respectively to provide a means for connecting duct member 10 to other fluid passage members. The flanges may be secured to the exterior surface 11 by conventional methods, such as welding or the like.

The particular configuration of the duct member 10 shown in FIGURE 1 is such that the angle of the elbow is 110. The '1 10 curvative, or arc, takes place between the points a and c which are shown along the centerline of the duct member 10. The outer radius r of the elbow is 6.55 inches, the inner radius r, is 1.55 inches, and both r and r generate from a common point 0 of the drawing. A hole 17 is located in the wall of duct member 10 at the outer radius r and at the midpoint b of the 110 arc of the elbow. Thus, the are a-- is a 55 are which locates the hole 17 at the radius r A pressure tap 18 is fixed to the exterior surface 11 so that it covers hole 17. The pressure ta-p 18 may be secured in place by usual and conventional means such as welding or the like. The tap itself contains a passage 19 which connects with hole 17, thus allowing fluid pressure within the duct member 10, and immediately adjacent hole 17, to be transmitted to the exterior of duct member 10. Similarly, a hole 22 is located at 1' diametrically opposite hole 17. A pressure tap 23 is secured in place over hole 22, and a passage 24 in tap 23 will transmit fluid pressure within duct member 10, and immediately adjacent hole 22, to the exterior of duct member 10. The tap 22 is similar in its physical geometry to tap 18, and passage 24 appears as a dead end passage in the drawing merely because tap 23 is turned with respect to tap 18.

A third hole 25 is positioned in the wall of the duct member 10, and is shown near end 14 of the duct member. A temperature tap 26 is secured in place over hole 25 and a passage 27 in tap 26 permits a temperature sensitive element, such as a thermocouple or the like, to be positioned therein in contact with a fluid flowing through duct member 10.

Referring now to FIGURE 2, the schematic diagram therein illustrates the apparatus associated with duct member 10 to measure the fluid flow and weight of fluid flow. As shown, a static pressure transducer P is connected to pressure tap 18. The P transducer produces an elec' trical signal indicative of the static presure of the fluid at hole 17 in duct member 10. The electrical signal, as shown by the representative wiring connection, is sent to a recorder. The static pressure transducer P may be a bellows type static pressure transduucer or other conventional type of static pressure transducer. One such transducer that can be used in the intsant apparatus is manufactured by the Statham Instrument Co. of Los Angeles, and is a commercially available item.

In addition to the use of a static pressure transducer, the instant apparatus also uses a plurality of differentialpressure transducers designated AP AP and AP Each AP transducer is connected between pressure taps 18 and 23 to measure the difference in fluid pressure between hole 17 and hole 22 in duct member 10. Each AP transducer is capable of producing an electrical signal indieative of the pressure difference being measured, which signal is sent to the recorder. The AP transducers may also be bellows or other conventional type transducers. Again, the Statham Instrument Co. of Los Angeles markets a AP transducer which can be used here.

Since each AP transducer is connected to both pressure 1 P.s.i.d.

APO -1 AP, 0-3 AP2 0-10 1 Lbs. per sq. inch difierential.

When such a plurality of AP transducers are utilized it becomes necessary to provide some means of protecting them from damage when the pressure diiferential exceeds their individual maximum operating pressure differentials. To provide this protection, valves 30, 31 and 32 are disposed in the fluid lines between the pressure tap 18 and the transducers AP AP and AP respectively. These valves are conventional on-off solenoid operated valves which are commercially available. To operate these valves, conventional static pressure switches S S and S are electrically connected thereto as shown in FIGURE 2, switch S controlling valve 30, S controlling valve 3 1, and S controlling valve32. Each static pressure switch is also connected by fluid line to pressure tap 18. Thus, static pressure switches are used to protect the AP transducers from dangerous pressure differentials, and this is made possible due to the fact that the static fluid pressure at pressure tap 18 is approximately equal to the fluid pressure differential between taps 18 and 23, which will become clear from the description of operation of the present invention.

Before passing to a discussion of the mechanics of the operation, however, some qualitative discussion will first be directed toward the fluid flow phenomena which underlie the operation and structure of the present invention. One characteristic common to the flow of fluid through a straight length of pipe is that the velocity of the fluid at the center of the pipe is greater than the velocity of the fluid at the sides of the pipe. This is easy to understand when it is remembered that the walls of the pipe impose a frictional drag on fluid flowing adjacent thereto. 'The result is a distribution of velocity across the pipe flow is as shown by the arrows 36 and 37, and that the.

velocity distribution at cross-section Z-Z is substantially as shown by graph X, then at cross-section Y--Y" the velocity distribution will have become substantially that shown by graph W. In graph W the maximum velocity occurs toward the outer radius of the elbow, and is no longer in the middle of the pipe cross section. Thus it'appears that the elbow tends to throw the fluid out- -wardly. Another qualitative way to consider the phe nomena is to realize that when the fluid flows around a curve it is subjected to centrifugal acceleration much like a ball being whirled around on the end of a string. Keeping this analogy in mind then, it is easy to see that the pressure in the fluid at the outside radius of the elbow is considerably greater than the pressure in the fluid at the inside radius of the elbow. Consequently, a fluid pressure difference exists between the outside and inside radius of the elbow, and it is possible to measure this pressure difference and calculate therefrom the rate of fluid flow through the elbow.

In order to achieve accurate results however, it is necessary to measure the pressure difference at carefully selected locations. While a fluid is flowing through the elbow, moving from cross section Z to cross-section Y-Y, its velocity distribution is changing and, as a consequence, considerable turbulence occurs. It has been experimentally verified, however, that after the fluid has progressed along the elbow curve for some distance then a smooth and nonturbulent laminar flow condition is established at the outer radius of the elbow. In the sec tion in which this laminar flow occurs, the pressure difference between inside and outside radii can be accurately measured. This can be seen to be an important feature when it is recalled that the end result is the accurate determination of liquid oxygen remaining in a missiles tanks, and which may have to produce a missile thrust having an accuracy to within a few feet per second.

There may be some pressure variations occurring at the inner radius of the elbow, but since the fluid there is at a relatively low pressure then the pressure variations which may occur will be low pressure variations, with negligible effect on the total pressure difierence be measured.

In the elbow shown in FIGURE 2 the laminar flow condition has been established by the time the fluid has flowed through an arc of 55. Thusthe pressure taps 18 and 23 are positioned at this point. It should be noted that this particular tap location would not be changed if the whole elbow was only-say in curvature, instead of the curvature shown. This is due to the fact that regardless of the overall curvature of the elbow, a fluid flowing therethrough will have to travel through a certain are before a smooth laminar flow condition will be produced at the outer radius.

Naturally however, a change in diameter and/ or radii of the elbow will have considerable eifect on the useful ness of the present invention. Thus, a one inch diameter pipe bent through 90 at a radius of approximately 10 feet would be, for all practical purposes, a straight length of pipe with no pressure difference at all occurring across its diameter. It is to be understood then, that prime considerations are the use of an elbow duct which will provide a pressure difference across its diameter, and which will provide a section of laminar fluid flow at its outer radius of curvature.

As previously mentioned, such an elbow can be incorporated in a system to determine the fluid flow through the elbow. The following is an explanation of the operation of the system shown in FIGURE 2. The static pressure transducer P shown therein measures the fluid pressure at pressure tap 18 and sends a corresponding electrical signal to the recorder. Each of the AP transducers measures the pressure differential between pressure taps 18 and 23 and sends a corresponding signal to the recorder. Each static pressure switch S measures the static pressure at pressure tap 18 and is set'to close its corresponding valve when the static pressure at tap 18 exceeds the maximum operating pressure differential of its corresponding AP transducer. As an example, assume that the operating range of the first AP transducer, AP is 0-1 p.s.i. Static pressure switch S is designed or set to produce an electrical signal when the static pressure which it monitors reaches 1 p.s.i. When the static pressure at tap 18 reaches 1 p.s.i. then switch S produces an electrical signal which is transmitted to and which closes valve 30. The closure of valve 30 disconnects transducer AP from pressure tap 18 so that additional increases in pressure will have no harmful effect on the transducer.

It should be noted that although the AP transducers measure the pressure differential between pressure taps '18and 23, the switches S are operated by the pressure.

from tap 18 only. The pressure at tap 18 is a relatively high pressure compared with the pressure at tap 23. Consequently, the magnitude of the static pressure at tap 18 is always slightly larger than the pressure difference between taps 18 and 23. It can be seen then, that using this static pressure, which is always greater than the pressure diiferential, to operate the switches S, automatically provides a safety tolerance which adds to the reliability of the protection afforded the AP transducers.

And finally, the temperature transducer T measures the temperature of the fluid flowing through the elbow and sends a corresponding electrical signal to the re corder. It is to be understood, however, that the recorder is only one terminus for the signals generated by the various transducers, and that it may be replaced by something else, connected in parallel with other units, etc.

Thus the system illustrated provides three different types of information, which information in the preferred embodiment of FIGURE 2 is sent to a recorder. The information supplied includes a static pressure (P) measurement, a temperature (T) measurement, and three difierential pressure (AP) measurements. The particular A? measurement to be used in determining the flow of fluid through the elbow depends on the accuracy desired. For the most accurate results, the AP measurement used should be that provided by the AP transducer which has the greatest sensitivity at the pressure differential level indicated by the measurement. It is possible, of course, to provide switching between the AP transducers and the recorder so that only the most accurate measurement reaches the recorder if so desired.

After the P, T, and AP information is recorded, it can then be used to determine the volume flow of fluid and the weight flow of fluid through the elbow. The difference between the two is that one is a determination of the volume of fluid flowing through the elbow, and the other is a determination of the weight of fluid flowing through the elbow. It can be seen that once the volume fluid flow is found, then the weight fluid flow is calculated by merely multiplying the volume fluid flow by the density of the fluid.

An equation which yields accurate values of the average velocity of the fluid in the elbow is the following:

has 1: P

pendent on the velocity V as follows:

Volume Unit time where A is the cross sectional area of the elbow. Thus, the flow may be expressed as:

Volume [E Unit of time c p and the weight fluid flow may be expressed as:

Weight J2, Unit of time c In these equations, the quantity AP is provided by the AP transducers, and the quantity the weight density,

. 6 is provided by the P and T transducers through appropriate relationships, such as for a gas, where R is the gas constant. 4

Thus it is seen that the parameters P, T, and AP will provide rate of flow information which can be converted to total volume and/or weight figures merely by multiplying by the quantity of time involved. In order to use the equations effectively, however, the nature of the constant C should be understood. It can be mathematically defined as follows:

where D is the diameter of the elbow and r is the radius corresponding to the mass center of fluid in the elbow at cross section YY. It would appear then that more theoretical calculations must be made in order to arrive at a value for C This is not necessary however, for C can be found experimentally by calibrating the elbow flow meter with a precision orifice type meter. This is the preferred approach, for it enables the elbow flow meter to be calibrated in place, i.e., in the ducting system in r lhich it will actually be used on a missile, aircraft or the The calibration is achieved by placing a precision orifice flow meter in the ducting system where it will measure the flow which must also pass through the elbow. Comparison of the results will yield an actual value for C as opposed to a theoretically determined value. This is felt to be the better course to follow, for the results desired are actual, not theoretical, results.

It should be noted that precise calibration with an orifice flow meter is made possible by the fact that the equations used in conjunction with such a flow meter have the same form as those used with the present invention. As an example, the weight flow through an orifice meter is determined by an equation of the form Weight Unit of time which is exactly like the equation used with the present invention, save for the constants involved.

The present invention thus constitutes a versatile and accurate flow measuring apparatus, of which certain preferred embodiments have been specifically disclosed, it being understood that the invention is not limited thereto as many variations will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art and the invention is to be given its broadest possible interpretation within the terms of the following claim.

What we claim is:

An elbow type flow metering device comprising a duct member having a cylindrical, in cross-section, interior passage, said passage having an elbow configuration with inner and outer radii of curvature, said passage having a smooth wall to provide at least one section in which substantially turbulence free laminar fluid flow can occur at said outer radius, a firs-t pressure tap disposed to intersect said section at said outer radius, a second pressure tap intersecting said passage substantially diametrically opposite said first pressure tap, a temperature tap intersecting said passage, a static pressure transducer connected to said first pressure tap, a plurality of differential pressure transducers, each differential pressure transducer being connected between said first and second pressure taps in parallel arrangement with the other of said plurality of differential pressure transducers, each of said plurality of differential pressure transducers having a unique maximum operating pressure ditferential, a plurality of pressure responsive safety means for disconnecting the differential pressure transducers from between said first and second pressure taps before their individual unique maximum operating pressure differentials are exceeded, a temperature transducer connected to said temperature tap, a recorder, and each transducer being electrically connected to said recorder and providing it with electrical signals indicative of the quantity being measured by the transducer.

References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS FOREIGN PATENTS 12,946 Great Britain Nov. 4,, 1903 OTHER REFERENCES The Hyperbo-Electric Flow Meter, an article in Power, vol. 57, No. 26, June 26, 1923, pages 1024 and. 1025. (Copy in Scientific Library.)

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1905558 *Sep 14, 1928Apr 25, 1933Foote LeonardMeasuring device
US2404868 *Mar 31, 1943Jul 30, 1946Tinius Olsen Testing Mach CoPressure responsive controlling mechanism
GB190912946A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4144754 *Mar 18, 1977Mar 20, 1979Texaco Inc.Multiphase fluid flow meter
US5641915 *Feb 3, 1995Jun 24, 1997Lockheed Idaho Technologies CompanyDevice and method for measuring multi-phase fluid flow in a conduit using an elbow flow meter
US5717146 *Oct 3, 1996Feb 10, 1998Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies CompanyDevice and method for measuring multi-phase fluid flow in a conduit having an abrupt gradual bend
US5827977 *Oct 3, 1996Oct 27, 1998Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies CompanyDevice and method for measuring multi-phase fluid flow and density of fluid in a conduit having a gradual bend
US5834659 *Oct 3, 1996Nov 10, 1998Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies CompanyDevice and method for measuring fluid flow in a conduit having a gradual bend
US5886267 *Oct 3, 1996Mar 23, 1999Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies CompanySystem and method for bidirectional flow and controlling fluid flow in a conduit
US5905208 *Oct 3, 1996May 18, 1999Lockheed Martin Idhao Technologies CompanySystem and method measuring fluid flow in a conduit
US7984612 *Aug 28, 2008Jul 26, 2011Daimler AgExhaust-gas turbocharger for an internal combustion engine
EP0158745A1 *Apr 17, 1984Oct 23, 1985The Dow Chemical CompanyFlow meter and densitometer apparatus and method of operation
WO1996024028A1 *Feb 2, 1996Aug 8, 1996Timothy J BoucherSystem and method for measuring and controlling bidirectional multi-phase fluid flow in a conduit
Classifications
U.S. Classification73/861.69
International ClassificationG01F1/20
Cooperative ClassificationG01F1/206
European ClassificationG01F1/20C