|Publication number||US3072502 A|
|Publication date||Jan 8, 1963|
|Filing date||Feb 14, 1961|
|Priority date||Feb 14, 1961|
|Also published as||DE1264351B|
|Publication number||US 3072502 A, US 3072502A, US-A-3072502, US3072502 A, US3072502A|
|Original Assignee||Pfizer & Co C|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (9), Referenced by (44), Classifications (9)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent i 3,072,502 PROCESS FOR REMOVING COPPER-CONTAINING IRON OXIDE SCALE FROM METAL SURFACES Salvatore Alfauo, Houston, Tex., assignor to Chas. Pfizer & Co., Inc., Brooklyn, N .Y., a corporation of Delaware No Drawing. Filed Feb. 14, 1961, Ser. No. 89,116 9 Claims. (Cl. 134-3) This invention is concerned with the cleaning of metal surfaces and more particularly with a new and valuable process for the removal of iron oxide scale from metals.
Operational scale deposited in steam-generating equipment usually consists of oxides of iron, often magnetite (Fe O .FeO) together with some red iron oxide (Fe O Where the unit is fabricated in part from alloys of copper, e.g. for the condensers, the scale will be found to contain copper as well, in the form of the elemental metal and sometimes as cuprous and cupric oxides. Such scale is generally tightly adherent and low in porosity. Its gradual build-up reduces heat transfer and water circulation to the point where, usually every one to four years, it must be removed. Since the shutdown of a high capacity boiler can easily represent losses of thousands of dollars per day, it is obvious that the most rapid and effective cleaning is desirable.
In the past, hydrochloric and other mineral acids have been employed for this purpose. However, it has been found that where the scale contains copper or copper oxides, iron oxide scale removal is accompanied by re,- deposition or plating out of elemental copper throughout the system. This copper not only accelerates corrosion and interferes with heat exchange, but it may flake off during operation and be carried through the superheater, causing expensive damage to the turbine surfaces.
Furthermore, high pressure boilers containing austenitic parts, eg superheater tubes, and operating at pressures of 2500-3000 psi. and higher are subject to chloride stress fatigue, and hence hydrochloric acid is frequently unsuitable as a cleaning agent. Mineral acids in general have the added disadvantage of attacking steel, even where corrosion inhibitors are incorporated, and present a safety hazard to personnel. Because of these problems, the nontoxic acids such as citric have been tested. Citric acid offers advantages in cleaning new units of preoperational scale because of its safety to equipment and personnel,
and because it readily dissolves rust and mill scale. However, dense operational scales containing magnetite are removed quite slowly by citric acid, and where copper is present the objectionable copper plating is encountered.
Since no satisfactory cleaning solution has been available to overcome all of these difficulties, the use of a series of solutions has been proposed to remove the various components of operational scale and to provide a relatively clean surface resistant to rapid re-corrosion. Such processes are only partially successful and, since they entail many time-consuming rinsing steps, may require 24 hours or more to complete. They therefore involve high costs in lost operation, and also usually require appreciable quantities of expensive ingredients. Additionally, where such processes employ a hydrochloric acid step they retain many of the described disadvantages and are usually not applicable to the cleaning of high pressure boilers containing austenitic materials.
Accordingly, it is an object of the presentinvention to provide a process for the rapid and complete removal of coppencontaining iron oxide scales from metal surfaces. Another object is to provide such a process which will remove both copper and iron oxide deposits in a single solution, without the necessity for intermediate drainage and rinsing.
A further object is a process which is safe to both per- Patented Jan. 8, 1963 sonnel and equipment, and which may be used even with very high pressure units containing austenitic alloys.
Another object is a process which is rapidly efiective even where tightly adherent magnetite scale predominates. Still another object is a cleaning process which efiiciently utilizes relatively lowconcentrations of inexpensive, readily available cleaning ingredients.
These and other objects are achieved by the new process of the present invention, which comprises an acidic ironoxide-removing step followed by an alkaline coppercomplexing step, both carried out in a single solution.
Acidic step.The first step of the new process consists of contacting the scaled surfaces with an aqueous solution of citric acid adjusted to a pH between about 2.5 and about 5 with a nitrogen base. While other acids, such as gluconic, tartaric, oxalic, lactic, glucoheptonic, glycollic, saccharic or malic acids, or mixtures thereof, may be effective in varying degree in the first step of my new process, citric acid possesses the virtues of high effectiveness, low corrosion rate, non-toxicity, ready availability and low cost. Mineral acids are not suitable.
The nitrogen base which I employ for the pH adjustment may be ammonia, an ethanolamine, or an aliphatic hydrocarbon amine. By an ethanolamine I mean ethanolamine, diethanolamine or triethanolamine. Any aliphatic hydrocarbon amine, primary, secondary or tertiary, may be employed, provided that it is water-soluble. Such amines include trimethylamine, 'diethylamine, the various primary butyland amylamines, ethylamine, propylamine, dimethylamine, triethylam% and the like. Ordinarily, ammonia will be preferred for its low cost and high effectiveness.
For high capacity and rapid cleaning I employ the citric acid in a concentration of at least about 1% W./v. Any concentration above 1% up to saturation may be used,but ordinarily concentrations above 10% w./v. offer no added advantage and are unnecessary. Concentrations between about 1.5 and about 3% w./v. are generally preferred. The expression w./v. means grams per 100 milliters; of page xiii, Merck Index, 6th edition, 1952.
, As previously stated, I adjust my citric acid solution to a pH between about 2.5 and about 5 with the base. Alternatively, I may dissolve monoammom'um citrate in water to provide a solution of equivalent concentration. Such a solution has a pH of about 3.5-4. Solutions having a 1 pH appreciably above 5 react only very slowly with magnetite scale and are therefore not preferred. It is particularly surprising, however, that citrate solutions having a pH appreciably below 2.5 are also quite slow in dissolving operational magnetite scale. The following table presents a comparison of the degree of effectiveness of various citrate solutions under equivalent conditions of time and temperature, as observed in a laboratory test with a magnetite scale.
Solution: Percent scale removal 3% citric acid 35-40 10% citric acid 4045 3% citric acid-l-NH to pH 3 98-99 This surprising eifect is especially advantageous since the may be introduced to substantially fill the system, i.e.
- the boiler, the risers and the steam drum. The solution is light or freshly deposited, room temperature treatment is adequate.
With heavier or older scales, it is usually preferable although not essential to heat the solution for most rapid cleaning. In this case, temperatures from about 140 F. up to the boiling point of the solution are most efiective. If desired, temperatures above the atmospheric boiling point may be employed by operating under pressure. However, this expedient is generally unnecessary. It is noteworthy that the process is so safe that no corrosion inhibitor is normally required, even at the higher temperatures. The progress of the cleaning is conveniently followed by withdrawing liquid samples periodically and assaying for iron according to any of the standard procedures. When the iron content of the solution becomes substantially constant the first phase of the operation may be regarded as substantially complete. Generally this will be found to occur after about one to three hours at temperatures of about 140-160 F.
Naturally, if the unit is small and heavily scaled, it is possible that the volume of cleaning solution which it can hold will become exhausted before all of the iron oxides have been removed. This situation is readily detected, since one mole of iron is complexed by each mole of citrate, i.e. 56 parts by weight of iron to each 192 parts by weight of citric acid. Therefore, if the molar iron content of the solution levels olf at a value corresponding to the original molar concentration of citric acid introduced, it is possible that the iron oxide has been in completely removed. If this is the case, it is safest to introduce additional citric acid and nitrogen base into the solution and repeat the process. Ordinarily, however, it is possible to estimate from past experience the amount of iron oxides to be removed, and to make due provision by employing a suitably high level of citrate where such will be required.
During the dissolution of iron oxides in the acidic cleaning step, elemental copper will usually plate out on the bare metal surfaces exposed to the solution. (This redeposition would occur even should such copper complexing agents as thiourea or diethylthiourea be incorporated in the solution. Moreover, such agents may sometimes accelerate attack of bare metal by acids.) However, in this phase of the operation copper plating is advantageous. The copper acts as a protective film on the steel, preventing even slight attack by the mild solution, and insuring that the citrate will react only with the oxide scale. Accordingly, cleaning time and citrate requirement are kept to a minimum, and bare metal is protected. However, as has already been pointed out, the copper film must be removed before putting the unit back in service. This is readily accomplished in the second or final cleaning step.
Alkaline step.--In this step I utilize the same cleaning solution, merely raising the pH with one of the nitrogen bases already described, without even draining the boiler. Triethanolamine is a particularly convenient base to Work with, since its low vapor pressure avoids fumes at the higher pHs. However, ammonia is eminently suitable, and economy may often dictate its use. The base is conveniently introduced in water solution, which may be pumped into the boiler. This will displace a small portion of the cleaning solution to waste, but the loss is inconsequential. The pH should be adjusted to between about 8 and about 10, preferably about pH 9. If mineral acid had been used in the first step, adherent iron oxides would reprecipitate upon thus raising the pH to the effective range.
Particularly good results are obtained when the alkaline step is begun with a free citrate concentration corresponding to about 0.5% w./v. or more citric acid. By free citrate I refer to that which is not complexed with iron. The free citrate concentration is readily calculated from the citric acid originally introduced and the final iron content of the solution, as previously described. If this concentration has dropped below a value corresponding to about 0.5% citric acid, additional citric acid may be intill 4 troduced at the start of the alkaline step. While'this is by no means essential to the successful operation of my new process, it has been observed to provide clear solutions free of the sediment which is sometimes encountered. This facilitates rapid and complete rinsing of the equipment after cleaning. Since free citrate concentrations corresponding to more than about 1.5% w./v. citric acid offer no added advantage, levels between about 0.5 and 1.5% will usually be preferred in the interest of economy.
During the alkaline cleaning step, addition of an oxidizing agent is often beneficial in increasing the reaction rate. A Wide range of oxidants are suitable. Air or oxygen are eminently suitable and are readily introduced by injection into the solution through a sparger or bubbler during alkaline cleaning. Among other gaseous oxidants which may be employed in the same manner is nitrogen tetraoxide. Where it is inconvenient to provide a sparger, the same advantage may be obtained by incorporating liquid or solid oxidants, such as potassium permanganate or nitrophenylsulfonic acid sodium salt, in the cleaning solution. Particularly convenient and effective are watersoluble inorganic salts, especially persulfates, perchlorates, bromates or nitrites. Suitable salts include, for example, the sodium, potassium and ammonium salts. Very little of such oxidant is required for the desired beneficial effect, ordinarily about one part by Weight for each part by Weight of copper to be removed.
The temperature for this step is not critical. Room temperature (or even lower) is quite suitable, but temperatures up to boiling may be used if desired. The solution at pH 8-10 is best circulated as before, until standard analysis of liquid samples indicates that the copper content is substantially constant. With air or other added oxidant one to two hours will usually suffice.
At this time the cleaning solution may be drained to waste and the unit rinsed with water. The treated surfaces are left silvery grey in color, scale-and copper-free, and ready for return to service. The entire operation usually requires only about 5-8 hours, even for a large unit.
The following examples are provided for illustrative purposes and should not be interpreted as limiting the invention, the scope of which is defined by the appended claims.
Example I A conventional controlled circulation boiler having a capacity of 1.5 million lbs. steam per hour at about 2000 psi. is shut down to remove operational deposits from the inner surfaces of the steel boiler, steam drum, risers and downcomer. The deposits are estimated to contain about 1000 lbs. of Fe O and about 50-100 lbs. of copper picked up from the condenser. The boiler water temperature is allowed to cool to 200 While a solution of 3000 lbs. citric acid in about 3000 gallons of Water is prepared in a separate tank and adjusted to about pH 2.7 with aqueous ammonia. This solution is then pumped into the bottom of the boiler, displacing an equal amount of water which is permitted to overflow to waste from the steam drum. The diluted cleaning solution in the boiler has a volume of about 22,000 gallons and a pH of approximately 3.7.
The boiler pumps are operated to slowly circulate the solution through the system (about 1 ft./sec. in the tubes) while periodic samples are withdrawn for iron analysis. After about two hours the iron content of the cleaning solution has become substantially constant at a value corresponding to about 900 pounds of dissolved iron, and the solution temperature has dropped to about F.
Since the iron analysis shows that substantially all of the citrate present is complexed with iron, an additional 2000 pounds of citric acid is dissolved in about 3000 gallons of water and pumped into the solution already in the boiler, together with sufiicient aqua ammonia to provide a pH of about in the total mixture. This operation requires about minutes. At this time, aeration of the solution is begun by admitting air from a compressor through a perforated pipe installed inside the boiler and connected to the boiler blowdown valve. The pipe acts as a sparger, facilitating good distribution of the injected air.
The solution is slowly circulated by means of the boiler pumps and aeration is continued without applying heat. After an hour the copper content Of the cleaning solution has leveled off at a value corresponding to approximately 80 pounds of dissolved copper.
The solution is now drained to waste and the system is rinsed with water, an operation that requires about an hour. Inspection of the interior of the boiler and steam drum reveals that the surfaces are pale silvery gray and free from traces of scale and foreign matter. No tendency for after-rusting is noted.
Example II A mild steel boiler tube sample, coated with a scale which proves upon analysis to contain magnetite, Fe O copper, and oxides of copper, is immersed in a 1% w./v. aqueous citric acid solution previously adjusted to pH 2.5 with triethanolamine, and the solution is heated at about 140 F. with gentle agitation for about 3 hours. At this time the iron content of the solution is substantially constant at a level corresponding to the original molar concentration of citric acid. The surface is free of scale and coated with copper.
After cooling to room temperature sufficient triethanolamine is added to raise the pH to about 8, and oxygen is bubbled through the solution with gentle agitation for about 3 hours. At the conclusion the steel is rinsed with water and found to have a scale-free silvery finish.
Example III Example IV A number of scaled tube samples similar to that of Example II are immersed in 1.5% citric acid solutions which have been adjusted to pH 5 with a series of amines:
Trimethylamine Diethylamine Diethanolamine Isobutylamine n-Amylamine Each solution with its immersed plate is boiled until the scale is removed and the plates covered with a light copper film. The molar iron content of the solutions corresponds closely to the citrate introduced. Each pH is now adjusted to about 8 with the amine previously employed. Air is then bubbled into the solutions with gentle stirring'until the copper has dissolved and clean metal surface exposed.
Example V A number of scaled boiler tube samples similar to those of Examples II and IV are immersed in 3% w./v. citric acid solutions adjusted to pH 4 with ammonia.
, After about 2 hours at 150 F. the scale has been re moved and the iron analysis indicates that citrate corresponding to about 1.5% citric acid remains uncomplexed.
Each solution is now adjusted to about pH 9 with armmonia, and to each is added 0.1% w./v. of one of a series of oxidizing agents:
The various solutions are heated at F. with gentle agitation until the copper plating has dissolved.
What is claimed is:
1. A process for the removal of copper-containing ir n oxide scale from metal surfaces which comprises contacting said surfaces with an aqueous solution containing at least about 1% w./v. citric acid together with sufficient base to provide a pH between about 2.5 and about 5, said base being selected from the group consisting of ammonia, an unsubstituted ethanolamine and a water-soluble aliphatic hydrocarbon amine, continuing said contact until the iron content of said solution becomes substantially constant, subsequently adjusting the pH of said solution with one of said bases to a value between about 8 and about 10, and maintaining the pH within said alkaline range while continuing said contact until the copper content of said solution becomes substantially constant.
2. A process as in claim 1 wherein said base is ammonia.
3. A process as in claim 1 wherein said base is triethanolamine.
4. A process as in claim 1 wherein said acidic cleaning step is conducted at a temperature between about 140 F. and the boiling point of said solution.
5. A process as in claim 1 wherein said alkaline cleaning step is conducted in the presence of an added oxidiz: ing agent.
6. A process as in claim 5 wherein said agent is air injected into said solution.
7. A process as in claim 5 wherein said agent is a water-soluble inorganic salt.
8. A process as in claim 7 wherein said salt is selected from the group consisting of persulfates, perchlorates, bromates and nitrites.
9. A process for the removal of copper-containing iron oxide scale from metal surfaces which comprises contacting said surfaces with an aqueous monoamrnonium citrate solution at a concentration equivalent to between about 1.5 and about 3% w./v. citric acid and a temperature between about 140" F. and the boiling point of said solution until the iron content of said solution becomes substantially constant, sub equently adjusting said solution with ammonia to a pH between about 8 and about 10 at a free citrate concentration equivalent to at least about 0.5% w./v. citric acid, and maintaining said alkaline solution in contact with said surfaces while injecting air until the copper content of said solution becomes substantially constant.
References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 865,700 Hernsheim Sept. 10, 1907 2,567,835 Alquist et al. Sept. 11, 1951 2,676,900 Spence et al. Apr. 27, 1954 2,817,606 Barrett Dec. 24, 1957 2,995,477 Florence Aug. 8, 1961 3,000,767 Elliott Sept. 19, 1961 3,003,899 Eberhard Oct. 10, 1961 3,013,909 Pancer Dec. 19, 1961 FOREIGN PATENTS 602,414 Canada July 26, 1960
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US865700 *||Jan 30, 1907||Sep 10, 1907||Maurice Hernsheim||Pickling process.|
|US2567835 *||Aug 29, 1949||Sep 11, 1951||Dow Chemical Co||Removing copper-containing incrustations from steam generators|
|US2676900 *||Jul 8, 1947||Apr 27, 1954||Hooker Electrochemical Co||Processes for removal of oxides from the surface of metals|
|US2817606 *||Mar 1, 1955||Dec 24, 1957||Klenzade Products Inc||Cleaning process|
|US2995477 *||May 26, 1955||Aug 8, 1961||Celanese Corp||Boiler cleaning process|
|US3000767 *||Apr 30, 1959||Sep 19, 1961||Solvent Service Inc||Method of cleaning internal ferrous metal surfaces of steam generating equipment|
|US3003899 *||May 17, 1957||Oct 10, 1961||Dow Chemical Co||Removal of scale deposits|
|US3013909 *||Mar 31, 1960||Dec 19, 1961||Pancer Guyon P||Method of chemical decontamination of stainless steel nuclear facilities|
|CA602414A *||Jul 26, 1960||Nat Aluminate Corp||Scale removal|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3447965 *||Oct 31, 1966||Jun 3, 1969||Dow Chemical Co||Removal of copper containing scale from ferrous surfaces|
|US3522093 *||Feb 27, 1967||Jul 28, 1970||Chem Cleaning & Equipment Serv||Processes of cleaning and passivating reactor equipment|
|US3639278 *||Dec 27, 1967||Feb 1, 1972||Grace W R & Co||Composition and method for inhibiting and removing scale using glycolic acid and lignosulfonic acid|
|US3664870 *||Oct 29, 1969||May 23, 1972||Nalco Chemical Co||Removal and separation of metallic oxide scale|
|US3993575 *||May 27, 1975||Nov 23, 1976||Fine Organics Inc.||Hard surface acid cleaner and brightener|
|US3996148 *||Jul 25, 1975||Dec 7, 1976||Pierre Fusey||Basic detergent for liquid lyes|
|US4209418 *||Jul 18, 1978||Jun 24, 1980||Union Carbide Corporation||Gelatin benzimidazole blends as inhibitors for carboxylic acids|
|US4250048 *||Jul 3, 1979||Feb 10, 1981||Custom Research And Development||Metal oxide remover containing a strong mineral acid, chelating agent and a basic ammonia derivative|
|US4264418 *||Sep 19, 1978||Apr 28, 1981||Kilene Corp.||Method for detersifying and oxide coating removal|
|US4452643 *||Jan 12, 1983||Jun 5, 1984||Halliburton Company||Method of removing copper and copper oxide from a ferrous metal surface|
|US4590100 *||May 3, 1985||May 20, 1986||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy||Passivation of steel with aqueous amine solutions preparatory to application of non-aqueous protective coatings|
|US4678597 *||Mar 17, 1986||Jul 7, 1987||Am International, Inc.||Chemical cleaning solution and method|
|US4692252 *||Mar 24, 1986||Sep 8, 1987||Vertech Treatment Systems, Inc.||Method of removing scale from wet oxidation treatment apparatus|
|US4810405 *||Oct 21, 1987||Mar 7, 1989||Dearborn Chemical Company, Limited||Rust removal and composition thereof|
|US4828743 *||Nov 20, 1987||May 9, 1989||Boyle-Midway Household Products, Inc.||Composition for rust removal and method of use thereof|
|US4861386 *||Nov 9, 1988||Aug 29, 1989||Dowell Schlumberger Incorporated||Enhanced cleaning procedure for copper alloy equipment|
|US5009714 *||Aug 25, 1989||Apr 23, 1991||Halliburton Company||Process for removing copper and copper oxide deposits from surfaces|
|US5015298 *||Jul 24, 1990||May 14, 1991||Halliburton Company||Composition and method for removing iron containing deposits from equipment constructed of dissimilar metals|
|US5021096 *||Mar 26, 1990||Jun 4, 1991||Khodabandeh Abadi||Method for removal of scale|
|US5296042 *||Nov 6, 1992||Mar 22, 1994||C. L. R. Resources, Inc.||Composition and process for treating sheet steel|
|US5482174 *||Jun 3, 1994||Jan 9, 1996||Fujitsu Limited||Method for removing copper oxide on the surface of a copper film and a method for patterning a copper film|
|US5529637 *||Feb 17, 1995||Jun 25, 1996||Hydrochem Industrial Services, Inc.||Formic-carboxylic acid mixtures for removing iron oxide sclae from steel surfaces|
|US5542981 *||Jun 22, 1994||Aug 6, 1996||Lee, Sr.; Clel E.||Process for removing mineral deposits from lagoon recycle lines|
|US5679170 *||Dec 8, 1995||Oct 21, 1997||Hydrochem Industrial Services, Inc.||Methods for removing iron oxide scale from interior surfaces of steel vessels using formic acid-citric acid mixtures|
|US5766684 *||Apr 21, 1997||Jun 16, 1998||Calgon Vestal, Inc.||Stainless steel acid treatment|
|US5858118 *||Aug 4, 1997||Jan 12, 1999||Calgon Vestal, Inc.||Stainless steel alkali treatment|
|US6042742 *||Jun 6, 1995||Mar 28, 2000||Whittemore; Michael||Composition and method for inhibiting chloride-induced corrosion of and limescale formation on ferrous metals and alloys|
|US6395693||Sep 27, 1999||May 28, 2002||Cabot Microelectronics Corporation||Cleaning solution for semiconductor surfaces following chemical-mechanical polishing|
|US6541434||May 23, 2002||Apr 1, 2003||Cabot Microelectronics Corporation||Cleaning solution for semiconductor surfaces following chemical-mechanical polishing|
|US6827090 *||Aug 6, 2001||Dec 7, 2004||R. Späne KG||Process for removing deposits from water-carrying systems and devices for water supply|
|US7931753||Sep 8, 2009||Apr 26, 2011||Areva Np Gmbh||Method for removing deposits containing magnetite and copper from containers in industrial and power plants|
|US9498802||Jul 25, 2013||Nov 22, 2016||Dominion Engineering, Inc.||Methods of reusing a cleaning solution|
|US20070267046 *||Oct 25, 2005||Nov 22, 2007||Areva Np Gmbh||Cleaning Process For Removing Magnetite-Containing Deposits From A Pressure Vessel Of A Power Station|
|US20100012154 *||Sep 8, 2009||Jan 21, 2010||Areva Np Gmbh||Method for removing deposits containing magnetite and copper from containers in industrial and power plants|
|US20120145187 *||Jul 1, 2010||Jun 14, 2012||Naigai Chemical Products Co., Ltd.||Method for treatment of iron-based metal surface exposed to superheated steam|
|USRE30714 *||Sep 14, 1978||Aug 18, 1981||The Dow Chemical Company||Removal of copper containing incrustations from ferrous surfaces|
|USRE30796 *||Sep 14, 1978||Nov 17, 1981||The Dow Chemical Co.||Scale removal, ferrous metal passivation and compositions therefor|
|DE19857342A1 *||Dec 11, 1998||Feb 17, 2000||Siemens Ag||Cleaning of container, especially a nuclear power plant steam generator, by modifying the solution resulting from iron oxide dissolution to dissolve copper and/or copper compounds before emptying the container|
|EP0239701A2 *||Nov 14, 1986||Oct 7, 1987||WASTE TREATMENT PATENTS & RESEARCH N.V.||Method of removing scale from wet oxidation treatment apparatus|
|EP0239701A3 *||Nov 14, 1986||Aug 10, 1988||Vertech Treatment Systems, Inc.||Method of removing scale from wet oxidation treatment apparatus|
|EP1819845B1 *||Oct 25, 2005||Sep 21, 2011||Areva NP GmbH||Cleaning method for removing deposits containing magnetite out of a pressure vessel of a power plant|
|WO1996009994A1 *||Sep 22, 1995||Apr 4, 1996||E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc.||Stainless steel alkali treatment|
|WO2008107072A1 *||Feb 20, 2008||Sep 12, 2008||Areva Np Gmbh||Method for removing deposits containing magnetite and copper from containers in industrial and power plants|
|WO2014018787A1 *||Jul 25, 2013||Jan 30, 2014||Dominion Engineering, Inc.||Methods of reusing a cleaning solution|
|U.S. Classification||134/3, 134/27, 134/22.19|
|International Classification||C02F5/08, C23G1/00|
|Cooperative Classification||C23G1/00, C02F5/08|
|European Classification||C02F5/08, C23G1/00|