Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3078654 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateFeb 26, 1963
Filing dateMar 7, 1962
Priority dateJul 21, 1961
Publication numberUS 3078654 A, US 3078654A, US-A-3078654, US3078654 A, US3078654A
InventorsMarshall Preston F
Original AssigneeKendall & Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Process for manufacturing wrapped elastic yarn
US 3078654 A
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Feb. 26, 1963 P. F. MARSHALL 3,

PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING WRAPPED ELASTIC YARN Original Filed July 21, 1961 S Sheets-Sheet l Zfl Z0 J5 f5 12 I! 7 0/5 Feb. 26, 1963 P. F. MARSHALL PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING WRAPPED ELASTIC YARN Original Filed July 21, 1961 3 Sheets-Sheet 2 Feb. 26, 1963 P. F. MARSHALL PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING WRAPPED ELASTIC YARN Original Filed July 21, 1961 WRAPPING YARN WINDUP FACTOR SECONDARY CORE CORE YARN TENSION ELASTIC CORE 5 Sheets-Sheet 5 WINDER SPEED F. P. M.

United States Patent Office 3,678,654 Patented Feb. as, less 3,078,654 PRUQESF: FUR MANUFACTURING WRAPPED ELASTIC YARN Preston F. Marshall, Walpole, Mass, assignor to The Kendail Company, Eoston, Masn, a corporation of Massachusetts Original appiication iniy 21, 1.961, Ser. No. 125,814. Divided and this application Mar. 7, 1962, her. No. 178,192

2 Uiairns. (Cl. 57-463) This invention is a division of my copending application Serial Number 125,814, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of my copending application Serial Numher 858,694, which relates to a novelty core-constructed yarn prepared from a filamentary material wrapped in a series of looped configurations about the axis of said yarn, and to a process and apparatus for producing said yarn without resorting to mechanical twisting devices. In carrying out this wrapping process, it is pointed out in applic'ation 858,694 that an inexpensive elastic yarn may be produced by wrapping a rubber core with rayon or nylon. The present invention relates to improvements and refinements in the preparation of wrapped elastic yarns.

More particularly, it relates to a process in which the degree of elongation and the modulus of a wrapped elastic yarn are controlled by the tensioning effect of a wrapping strand or strands, said strand or strands being wrapped around the elastic core by a stream of fluid, without resorting to conventional twisting devices as are customarily used to wrap elastic yarns. The wrapping or tensioning yarn has no true twist around the elastic core, and an elastic yarn, wrapped by the process of this invention, may readily be maintained in stable configuration, at a predetermined state of extension, or at any intermediate degree of extension between full extension and substantially complete relaxation.

Due to the ease with which they are handled, and to the ready control of their elastic properties, yarns made accordin to this present invention are of particular suitability for the preparation of elastic fabrics used in knitted dress goods, girdles, bathing suits, supportive garments, and the like. Furthermore, the elastic yarn of this invention is characterized by a type of wrapping which imparts to the yarn a desirable softness and freedom from abrasive effect, esthetically and physically attractive in garments worn next to the skin.

As a further consequence of the loop-like nature of the wrapping strand, as explained more fully hereinbelow, the yarns of my invention are characterized by an ability to felt or lock together when woven or knitted into garmerits or industrial fabrics, such felting being of a nature and a degree not realizable with conventionally wrapped yarns, or with novelty yarns of the chenille type. Such fabrics are eminently suited for use as dampening roll covers, applicator pads, inner soles, filters, and other uses to which felts or felted fabrics are devoted.

It is an object of this invention to provide a wrapped elastic yarn which is stable and non-kinking in nature although only a single end of wrapping strand is applied to the elastic core.

It is a further object of this invention to provide an elastic cored yarn that is maintained permanently or ternporarily in a predetermined degree of axial elongation by the looping configuration of the covering strand.

It is a further object of this invention to provide an elastic yarn with a fuzzy surface arising from pedicled loops projecting outwardly from the main axis of the yarn.

Another object of this invention is to provide an elastic yarn where the surface softness is maintained even when the yarn is extended beyond its relaxed state or more.

Still another object of this invention is to produce an elastic yarn with the drape and suppleness of an uncovered elastic yarn.

A further object of this invention is to provide a yarn of normally non-feltable components which is capable of being knitted, woven, or otherwise fashioned into fabrics which are characterized by the smooth and uniform surface associated with wool felts.

The invention may be more clearly understood by referring to the drawings herein.

FIGURE 1 is a drawing of the apparatus used to produce the yarn.

FIGURE 2 is an enlarged cross-sectional view, partially cut away, of one part of the apparatus called the vortex chamber.

FIGURE 3 is a cross-sectional view of FIGURE 2, showing the process of wrapping.

FIGURES 4, 5, 6, and 7 are cross-sectional views of FIGURE 2 taken in the horizontal plane BB showing the wrapping operation in four phases of the development of a typical wrapping cycle.

FIGURE 8 is a perspective view of the wrapped yarn of the invention, idealized and simplified to show the fundamental equality of right-hand and left-hand turns 'of wrapping strand around the core strand.

FIGURE 9 is a diagrammatic perspective view, partially broken away, of a yarn of the present invention when the wrapped elastic yarn has been extended.

FIGURE 10 is the relaxed version of FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 11 is a cross-sectional view of FIGURE 10.

FIGURE 12 is a highly enlarged hypothecated perspective view of the composite yarn during processing.

FIGURE 13 is a flow sheet of the process of FIGURE 1 showing the operational information that is recorded in table form in Examples 1 through 6 of the specification.

Referring first to the drawing of FIGURE No. 1, the elastic corde It) may be one or more strands of natural rubber or of a synthetic rubberlike material which has sufficient elasticity to make it suitable for the purposes to which elastic yarns may be put. This core 10 is supplied from a package 12 and threaded over star wheels of conventional design 14 and 16 up through a vortex chamber 18, and around the star wheels 26 and 22 through a guide 24 to a winder 26. One or more covering strands 28 are furnished from a yarn package 3t and partially wrapped around the feed wheel 32 and fed into the vortex chamber 18. A secondary core yarn 34 from the supply package 36 may be threaded around the star wheel 38 and fed with the elastic core 10 into the vortex chamber 18. This second core yarn 34 is omitted in many of the examples described below. In operation, to carry out the method of the invention, the core elastic strand It) is fed by the .through the inlet 46 by the rotating air mass.

star wheels 14 and 16 more slowly than it is withdrawn by the star wheels 20 and 22 of the take-up mechanism and thus passes through the vortex chamber 18 in a state of tension. The covering strand 28 is delivered by the feed wheel 32 at a linear speed that is usually some to 50 times faster than the linear delivery rate of the take-up star wheels 20 and 22. The wrapping strand 28 covers elastic core within the vortex tube and the composite yarn emerges from the vortex tube to complete its travel through the mechanism as a single composite strand 40. The winder 26 operates at a slower speed than the take-up star wheels and 22, thus allowing the composite strand to contract a specified amount before being packed in bobbin form.

The heart of the operation is the vortex tube 18 shown in FIGURES 2 through 7. In FIGURE 2, the inside chamber of the tube has a cylindrical wall 42 with a pair of tangential openings 44 and 46 thereinto and end walls 48 and 50 having openings 52 and 54. As a meansfor creating a longitudinally extending whirling body of fluid in said chamber, the tangential chamber opening 44 is connected to a source of fluid pressure by the tube 56. The preferred tangential direction of the air stream, coupled with the generally cylindrical shape of the chamber, creates a miniature tornado in the vortex chamber with .a rapidly revolving stream of air circulating around the inside walls.

The wrapping strand 28 is drawn into the chamber The rate at which the strand 28 enters the chamber is less than the velocity of the rotatingair as measured at the periphery of the chamber. This slippage between the air velocity and the yarn velocity can be deduced from the fact that the portion of the strand 28 located outside of the chamber is under considerable tension, and this tension apparently acts toreduce the entering velocity of the strand 10.

High-speed motion pictures show that the strand 28 after entering the chamber tends to maintain a circular path around the wall 42 for about one-quarter of a turn. 'An elementoftheyarn once inside the chamber and, removed at least 90 from the point of entry, should be free to accelerate to a speed more nearly matchedto the peripheral speed of the rotating air. This canbe deduced from the fact that once the yarn has passed through at least 90 of chamber arc, the axial tension of the yarn nolonger can etfectively retard the speed of rotation since the forces of the air are now tending to accelerate the-yarn at some angle to its axis. Referring to FIGURE 4, the covering strand 28, in the configurationshown, under the accelerating forces of the air, is apparently moved into theconfiguration of a loop 58 shown inFIGURE 5.

Since this wrapping is made byastrand doubledinto a loop, the collapsing of ,a loop around the circumference of the core strand necessarily involves no net true twisting of the wrapping strand. Examination of the nature of the wrap shows frequent reversals of direction, amounting to many reversals per inch. A possible explanation of this is shown in FIGURES 5 and 6. It will be noted that as a leading loop 58 is formed in FIGURE 5, there is automatically formed an arc, bend, or incipient loop 59 which is headed in a direction opposite to the direction of loop -58. In FIGURE 6, the loop 58 has narrowed in the process of collapsing around the core yarn, while the bend 59 has simultaneously elongated into an oppositely-directed loop.

Since the core strand is notbeing twisted, and the wrapping strand is being applied only inlooped form, it is obvious that whatever the relative lengths of loops 58 and 59, there must be asmany right-hand turns of wrapping strand as there are left-hand turns, as is illustrated in FIGURE 8. This is true notonly considering the net effect on the total length of wrapped yarn, butthe'frequent reversals of direction of wrap effected by this invention means that right-hand and left-hand turns average out in small subsections of length. By this means, a stabilized and non-kinking wrapped yarn can be produced with a single Wrapping strand, whereas conventional wrapping requires two strands running in opposite directions, one balancing the torque imparted by the other.

While a loop 58 is winding around the core 10, FIG- URE 7, another loop 60 is being formed and the process is repeated. In FIGURE 7 the loop 59 of FIGURE 6 is not shown: actually loop 59 is now wrapped around the core yarn 10 but is concealed by the overwrap of loop 58. As these loops 58, '59 and 60 are formed at high speed, they apparently tend to be located one on top of another as shown in FIGURE 3 in side view and in FIGURE 7 in plan view. These loops 58, 59 and 60 are then carried upward and out ofthe chamber. Since to date high-speed motion pictures have failed to photographically stop these high-speed yarns, the above explanation of the workings of the chamber must be considered hypothetical and the claimed invention must remain independent of this hypothetical explanation. It can be pointed out, however,'that the existence Qfhigh-speed loops 58 and 60 is sustained by the observation that high-speed motion pictures taken at 8000 frames per second and projected at 24 frames per second failed to stop the motion of these loops in a one-quarter inch diameter cortex chamber. It can be calculated that had the loops been rotating at the peripheral velocity at which strand (10) enters the charm her, the photographs should have stopped the motion.

The wrapping of a doubled strand around the elastic core does not always proceed until the end of the loop is laid down in a smooth, radially wrapped configuration. Due to slight irregularities in the yarn components, or to occasional instances of turbulence in the air stream,

loopsmay become twisted around their own double-strand axis. This forms what I call a pedicledloop, and is illustrated in FIGURES 9, 10, 11, and in enlarged form in FIGURE 12.

As may be seen in FIGURE 12, a multiplicity of the double-back ends may form loops 66 with twisted pedicles 72 which are frequently intertwisted with adjacent pedicled loops as at 68 and 70. The loops 66, 68, and 70, etc., extend generally perpendicular to and radially of the tensioned central elastic core strand 10 from the central axis of the yarn, and outwardly there beyond. In the so-wound and twisted wrapped strand, the individually looped strand portions may be partially entangled, snarled, and inerlocked with adjacent looped portions as shown at 74 and 76 in FIGURE 12, so as to resist unwinding. This resistance to slippage and unwinding, together with the packed nature of wrapped loops against wrapped loops, is another factor which enables the wrapped yarn of this invention to be stable and non-shrinking even when the core is highly tensioned.

The characteristic wrapping of the yarn of this invention may be seen in FIGURE 9, which represents the yarn of FIGURE 10 extended about 100%. In FIGURE 9, the wrapping strand is disposed in the form of more or less smoothly wrapped bundles of loops, 62, which wrap around the core strand 10, interspersed with radiallyextending pedicled loops 61 extending outward from and perpendicular to the axis of the core strand. Both FIG- URES 9 and 10 are magnified several times for illustrative purposes. Where a very fuzzy yarn is desired, the formation of more radially extending pedicled loops is encouraged by increasing the air pressure which feeds the wrapping strand. Whether this is due to induced turbulence or not, excess air pressure usually creates a wild" yarn characterized by many radially-extending loops.

An unexpected advantage in the utilization of the covered yarns of this invention lies in the manner in which the radially-extending loops facilitate felting or yarn-toyarn entanglement when such yarns are fashioned into a fabric. With a minimum amount of fulling, or in some cases a simple steaming and pressing operation, the loops on one yarn are caused to entangle or interlock with the loops on adjacent yarns. This not only causes yarn-to-yarn mechanical adhesion within the fabric, but also creates a novel felt-like surface which may simulate a smooth, tightly Woven, high count fabric even though the calculated arithmetical cover factor of the actual fabric is relatively low.

An additional unexpected advantage residing in fabrics fashioned from the yarns of the invention lies in the extraordinarily high and fleecy nap that can be raised thereon by a conventional napping operation, and the tightness with which the napped yarns are locked to the base or core yarn. This appears to be due to the fact that the radially-extending loops of wrapping yarn olfer a ready surface to the teeth of the napping machine, being readily available to these teeth without the need for digging into or abrading the yarn surface as is the case where the wrapping yarn is oriented generally parallel to the axis of the core strand. Although the radial loops are'wrapped around the core strand, they are for the most part capable of further elongation when engaged with the wire teeth of a revolving napping roll. Apparently the pull of the tooth elongates the loop, with a consequent tightening of the involuted base where it is wrapped around the core.

Elongation of the loop proceeds until the resistance of the constantly tightening loop base is greater than the pull'of the napping tooth on the loop, whereupon the loop is broken, usually at or near its tip. In this way, extremely fleecy and firmly anchored naps can be raised on base fabrics made from the yarns of the present invention.

PRE-ELONGATED WRAPPED ELASTIC YARNS The geometry of the winding which apparently results from the practise of this invention appears to be the means by which the wrapping yarn is able to accomplish the task of holding an extended elastic core yarn in a predetermined state of extension, thus providing the unexpected novelty of a wrapping configuration which can hold an elastic core in a state of extension while remaining soft and appealing to the touch. Turning to FIGURE 9, this can probably be explained in the following manner: The wrapping strand 28 is applied to the core in a series of closely spaced bundles of tight wrappings 62 and pedicled loops 61, each bundle 62 consisting of a multiplicity of turns formed by the wrapping of a single loop. These series of bundles are applied during a time when the elastic core is held in a state of stretch, during which this stretch has caused a decrease in the diameter of the elastic core. Two desirable results follow from this geometric configuration of the wrappings on a tensioned core.

First, the bundles of wrappings pinch the core so that, when the force which was applied to stretch the core is removed, the core is unable to regain its original unstretched diameter and, thus, is hindered from contracting to its original relaxed length.

Secondly, when the core is allowed to contract the individual bundles of wrappings 62 are brought closer together until they interact, one against the other, to resist any further contraction of the core.

Another consequence of the nature of the wrapping of this invention is that it otters little or no resistance to the extensibility of the final wrapped product. Conventionally, elastic yarns are wrapped with at least two strands of a continuous filament yarn which fit more or less snugly like a sleeve on the core. The extent to which such a yarn can be extended is geometrically limited by the diameter of the core and by the angle which the wrapping strand makes with the core. In order to produce a conventional wrapped yarn with substantial elongation, it is necessary that the elastic core be stretched to near the desired ultimate elongation during the Wrapping process, so that sufiicient turns of wrapping yarn can be accommodated. A conventional wrapped yarn, therefore, can be extended only to the approximate point to which the elastic core was extended during the wrapping process.

In the wrapped yarns of the present invention, however, the loops of wrapping strand provide a slack-wrap portion which comes into play when the yarn of this invention is extended. In the unextended condition, the loops and convolutions are held more or less snugly against each other by the retraction of the core, which having been wound under tension, tends to contract in length until sufficient jamming of the looped wrapping prevents further contraction. Extension of the yarn of this invention results in a freeing-up of the jammed condition: loops are free to be extended in the direction of elongation, and the yarns are observed to demonstrate a built-in slack which gives and recovers as an elongating force is applied and removed.

As an example, for a conventionally wrapped elastic yarn to be capable of elongating 400%, or to five times its untensioned length, the elastic core must be elongated and held to this extension during the wrapping process. This limits the production speed of the processing equipment.

Due to the built-in looped slack of the unique wrapping of this invention, however, an elastic core need be extended in the wrapping process only or so, or merely sufficient extension to prevent whipping of the core in the air stream, in order for a wrapped yarn to be produced which can be subsequently elongated 500% or more. Since the speed of the Wrap of this invention does not involve a twisting device, wrapping is very rapid. For this reason, the lower the degree of elongation that must be imparted to the elastic core in the wrapping process, the higher are the economies of the process.

It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that wide variations may be effected in the texture, pretensioning, and denier of the finished composite yarn by adjusting the speeds and other parameters of the process. The following examples, in tabular form, are based on the process of FIGURE 1 as represented schematically by the fiowsheet of FIGURE 8.

In the following examples listed in Table 1, three types of vortex tube were used. Type A was a cylindrical glass chamber A inch in diameter and /8 inch in height, with tan ential air and wrapping yarn inlets of 0.040 and 0.020

inch in diameter, respectively. Type B was a cylindrical chamber of Kel-F, a fluorocarbon polymer manufactured by the M. W. Kellog Company, and had the same dimensions as Tube A except that the tangential yarn inlet was 0.016 inch in diameter. Type C was glass, with the same chamber dimensions as types A and B, but with tangential air and yarn inlets of 0.027 and 0.031 inch in diameter, respectively.

Core yarn tension is measured by the relative speeds of the take-up wheel 20 and the input letoif wheel 16 of FIGURE 1.

The wrapping yarn condensation factor is a measure of the number of feet of wrapping yarn being drawn into the vortex tube over letofl wheel 32, compared with the number of feet of wrapped composite yarn leaving the vortex tube via take-up wheel 20.

The windup contraction factor is a measure of the degree of relaxation which the yarn is allowed to undergo between the letoif Wheel 20 and the winder 26.

Lycra yarn is a trademark for a polyurethane yarn manufactured by E. I. duPont.

Table 1 Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 5 .Example 6 Vortex tube type A" B 13.. B.

Core 10 type 75s rubber 44's rubber Lycra, 420 d... Lycra, 420 d... Lycra, 420 (1. Core 10 input 252 i.p.m 31 f.p.m 37.5 f.p.m. 125 t.p.m 37.5 (pm. Core 34 type N yofiiil, 260 d. None Ngion 70 d None None.

-Core 34 input 233 f. .m 179 f.p.n1

Type of wrap Nylon 70 (1. Nylon 70 d. Nylon d. Nylon 70 d Nylon 20 d.

34 ill. 34 til. 7 fil. 34 fil. 7 til.

Wrap input 3,773 f.p.m 3,758 f.p.m.-

Air pressure" 40 p.s.i. 50 l Core yarn tension stretch factor Zero 04. Wtrapping yarn condensation factor before relaxa- 14.97 times.-.

lon.

Speed of Wrapped yarn leaving vortex tube 252 f.p m 630 f.p.m 180 pm Speed of wrapped yarn at windup 252 I.p.m 310 I.p.rn---.- 160 f.p.m Windup contraction factor Zero 50.8% 10.6%. Total denier of final product, relaxed 2,108 2,046 "2- Air consumption measured by flow meter 33 cu. ft. 11L-" 29 cu. ft. hr- 31 cu. ft. hr.

In Example 1 above in the table, it is noted that the rubber core is run under zero extension. Under such conditions, this low extension would normally allow the slack elastic core yarn to be whipped around by the rotating air and destroyed. This tendency has been eliminated by the addition of a second core yarn 34, as shown in FIGURE 1, of relatively inextensible material. By feeding this second core yarn under tension in close proximity to the elastic core yarn 10, the rotational velocity imparted to the elastic core yarn by the vortex tube results in the elastic core yarn twisting itself about the second core yarn 34 and being carried through the vortex tube supported in this manner.

In Example 2, it is noted that the core yarn is so tightly covered that it is held in highly extended condition. This does not mean that the resulting composite yarn is not elastic, but that the stretch factor imparted to the elastic core during the wrapping process in the vortex chamber is preserved and locked in by the wrap, so that when the composite final yarn is fully relaxed, the elastic core therein is five times the length it would show if the wrapping yarn were removed. I have found that tightlywrapped, highly-extended yarns of this type may be treated with hot water or steam to plasticize the wrapping, whereupon the elastic core is free to contract further to as much as 50% of its dry, highly-extended condition. This is particularly advantageous when it is desired to add further elasticity to fabrics fashioned from highly-extended yarns.

A very useful effect can be obtained from the use of the yarn of Example 3, where the Lycra elastic core is reinforced with a nylon strand, during the wrapping process. The auxiliary core yarn acts as a limit control by limiting the elongation that the composite yarn may undergo, during subsequent knitting or weaving operations. Such a limitation in elasticity enhances the evenness of the fabricating operation and the evenness of the fabricated structure. After fabrication, the fabric may be mechanically extended to the point where the auxiliary, relatively inelastic core is ruptured by being strained beyond its tensile limit. In this sense, the auxiliary core serves as a scaffolding yarn, the restraining effect of which is eliminated after it has served its purpose. By proper selection of the auxiliary core, various resistances to breaking may be developed: for instance, a 75 denier '30 filament rayon auxiliary core is relatively frangible,

being readily ruptured by moderate distortion, resulting 6 in the relaxation of the composite yarn and added elasticity in fabrics woven therefrom. Fabrics fashioned from the nylon auxiliary core of Example 3 may be treated to intermittent, zonal, or selected discontinuous overstrains to allow only certain composite yarns, or sets of yarns, to relax, with the formation of puckered or shirred effects.

Having thus described my invention, .1 claim:

1. A method of making a wrapped, extended elastic yarn which comprises continuously passing atleast one elastic core strand axially through a generally cylindrical body of fluid whirling about a central axis while maintaining said elastic strand or strands in a predetermined condition of extension, continuously overfeeding at least one continuous wrapping strand into said'body of fluid generally tangentially thereof, continuously maintaining an overfed portion of said wrapping strand within said body of fluid to form doubled-back loops in said wrapping strand, winding said loops indoubled configuration around and in intimate contact with said elastic core strand whilernaintaining said core strandunderpredetermined extension, and continuously removingthe wrapped extended yarn from said fluid body.

2. A method of making a wrapped cored yarn which is non-elastic under low stress but which becomes elastic under moderate stress, which comprises continuously passing an elastic core strand together with a relatively frangible continuous nonelastic core strand axially through a generally cylindrical body of fluid whirling about a central axis, continuously overfeeding at least one continuous wrapping strandinto said body of fluid generally tangentially thereof, continuously maintaining an overfed portion of said wrapping strand within said body of fluid to form loops in said wrapping strand, winding said loops in theforrn of a double-strand wrap around and in intimate contact with said core strands, said wrapping forming a series of closely spaced and partially overlapping helices possessing an equal number of right-hand and left-hand strand turns around said core strands, and continuously removing the wrapped yarn from said fluid body.

References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,009,309 Breen et a1 Nov. 21, 1961 3,013,379 Breen Dec. 19, 1-961 FOREIGN PATENTS 557,020 Belgium Oct. 26, 1957 861,327 Great Britain Feb. 15, 1961 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No. 8,078,654 February 26,, 1963 Preston F Marshall 7 It is hereby certified that error appears in the above numbered patv ent requiring correction and that the said Letters Patent should read as corrected below.

Column 2 line 48, for "corde" read core column 3, line 20, for "extending" read extended column 4 line 27, for "cortex" read vortex line 5O for "inerlocked" read-- interlocked columns 7 and 8 Table '1 under the heading/"Example 4", third line from botton, for "l7l5%"' read 05% Signed and sealed this 24th day of September 1963.,

( EAL) ttest:

DAVID L. LADD Commissioner of Patents ERNEST W. SWIDER Attesting Officer

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3009309 *Jul 16, 1956Nov 21, 1961Du PontFluid jet twist crimping process
US3013379 *Jul 5, 1960Dec 19, 1961Du PontProcess for making elastic bulky composite yarn
BE557020A * Title not available
GB861327A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3180115 *Jul 19, 1962Apr 27, 1965Kendall & CoDampening roll cover
US3387448 *Dec 30, 1963Jun 11, 1968Chadbourn Gotham IncStretched and stabilized yarns and fabrics
US3388546 *Nov 16, 1966Jun 18, 1968Kendall & CoNubbed elastic yarn and method of making same
US3940917 *Sep 5, 1974Mar 2, 1976E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And CompanyComposite elastic yarns and process for producing them
US4043142 *Feb 24, 1975Aug 23, 1977The Kendall CompanyDampening roll cover
US4304092 *Jun 18, 1980Dec 8, 1981Hercules IncorporatedNovelty slub fiber
US5454404 *Mar 15, 1994Oct 3, 1995Yoshida Kogyo K.K.Weave structure for preventing woven tape selvedge from fraying
US5481861 *Apr 21, 1994Jan 9, 1996Jones Stroud & Co. Ltd.Method of making a composite elastic yarn
US5560192 *Jun 2, 1995Oct 1, 1996Jones Stroud & Co., Ltd.Composite elastic yarn
US6945026 *Dec 3, 1999Sep 20, 2005Dyers Road Re-Manufacturing And Imports LimitedFibre yarn and rope production
DE1510695B1 *Jun 3, 1964Nov 19, 1970Kendall & CoVerfahren zur Herstellung eines Kerngarnes mit potentieller Elastizitaet
EP0400838A2 *May 16, 1990Dec 5, 1990JONES STROUD & CO LTDCombined elastic or elastomeric yarn and methods of manufacturing same
WO2012076862A1 *Nov 25, 2011Jun 14, 2012Wykes International LimitedImprovements in or relating to a combination yarn
Classifications
U.S. Classification57/6, 57/225, 57/350, 57/207
International ClassificationD02G1/16, D02G3/22, D02G3/32
Cooperative ClassificationD02G1/16, D02G3/328
European ClassificationD02G1/16, D02G3/32E