Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3103098 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateSep 10, 1963
Filing dateOct 18, 1961
Priority dateOct 18, 1961
Publication numberUS 3103098 A, US 3103098A, US-A-3103098, US3103098 A, US3103098A
InventorsRichard F Dyer
Original AssigneeEastman Kodak Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Variable luster yarn and method of manufacture
US 3103098 A
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)




AITORNEYB Sept. 10, 1963 1 R. F. DYER 3,103,098


BY MW MN M .AI'TORNEYS United States Patent Office 3,183,898 Patented Sept. 10, 1963 VARIABLE LUSTER YARN AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE Richard F. Dyer, Kingsport, Tenn, assignor to Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, N.Y., a corporation of New Jersey Filed Oct. 18, 1961, Ser. No. 145,887 6 Claims. (Cl. 57-140) This invention relates to a continuous multifilament yarn characterized by randomly spaced zones of high and subdued light reflectance wherein the zones of high luster are composed of filaments have a greater denier per filament size than those zones of reduced luster. More particularly, this invention concerns a method or process for the manufacture of such novel variable luster yarns.

This invention is a continuation-in-part of my application Serial No. 400,544, filed December 28, I953. In my aforesaid earlier application there has been described several novel yarns and methods of manufacture. These yarns include interlaced yarn and in particular a yarn which I have earlier described as intermittent bulk yarn. Said intermittent type yarn is to some extent a variable denier yarn in that it has zones of bulking and nonbulking. However, said zones in my earlier yarn are somewhat the reverse of the zones in the present new and improved yarn. In the manufacture of such earlier intermittent type yarns, an already formed multifilament yarn is subjected to an outside tension device positioned outside of a bulking jet before the yarn passes to the jet. By control and operation of said outside tension device, this permits producing in the yarn areas of bulk or no bulking, with entangling, interlacing or intermingling of the filaments as may be desired.

While such process has utility and permits the manufacture of interesting appearing and a useful yarn product, such process, as well as other earlier processes which will be referred to below, are slower of operation than the present process. Therefore, the expense of manufacturing novelty yarn by such prior processes is higher than by the simplified, improved process of the present invention.

In further detail, in the earlier art it has been shown that yarns of variable luster can be produced by alternating intermittent extrusion of clear spinning dope and pigmented spinning dope through a yarn extruder spinnerette. It has also been shown that continuous filament yarns can be made having randomly spaced zones of decreased luster by exposing the yarn in such delustered zones to chemical or mechanical treatment which roughens or disturbs the surfiace of the individual fibers or entangles and loops the filaments in said delustered zones. For example, US. Patent 2,783,609 refers to the feature of intermittent impulsing of the multifilament. US. Patent 2,780,833 refers to the producing of yarns of variable color or luster by alternate extrusion of two diiferent spinning dopes. US. Patent 2,316,245 shows means for roughening yarn at intervals along its length. In general, such older methods have certain disadvantages or limitations. As compared to extrusion rates frequently used for dry spinning cellulose ester and the like yarns, any of the above type processes, the intermittent treatment, the roughened treatment or the like, are relatively slow speed operations. Therefore, the poundage of yarn produced by such prior art procedures and apparatus per apparatus position is small vand, therefore, the capital investment in equipment is a relatively large amount. The intermittent impulsing or looping of the yarn, while it results in a delustered effect in the area of filament loops, may on occasion be undesirable because the loopy filaments drastically change the hand or feel of the yarn or fabric and also the apparent yarn diameter. The toughening or abrading process, while it dulls or delusters the yarn, results in broken filaments and changes the characteristic hand of the yarn from that of a continuous multifilament yarn to that of a staple spun or cotton-like yarn.

Accordingly, it is believed apparent that the development of improved processes for making such novel type yarns represents a highly desinable result. Therefore, if in the course of spinning multifilarnent yarns at high speeds the yarn characteristics may be varied in a controlled random manner such that in later processing of the yarn it would develop lustrous and delustered areas this would be advantageous. This is so in that such may be accomplished by the present invention without the need of attaching any special pulsating or the like devices to certain of the equipment used in the present invention.

It is an object of this invention, therefore, to disclose continuous multifilament yarn having intermittently and randomly occuring areas of bright lustrous appearance and equal or increased yarn diameter and other areas of reduced luster and equal or reduced yarn diameter. A further object is to disclose a simple high speed process for producing such a yarn. A further object is to disclose a unique means of mechanically delustering a continuous multifilament yarn without materially changing the hand and texture of the yarn or fabric produced from it. Other objects will appear hereinafter.

I have found that yarns comprised of filaments having unusual stiffness do not respond to the entangling, interlacing or looping action induced by bulking jets of the type disclosed in Dyer Patent No. 2,924,868, or Head Patent No. 2,884,756 or the like apparatus. Thus, by producing a continuous multifilament yarn having randomly occurring lengths where all the filaments are of substantially greater stiffness than in other areas, a yarn can be produced by passing it through -a non-turbulent lofting jet wherein the zones of high fiber stiffness are not treated and remain lustrous, and the filaments in zones of low fiber stiffness are entangled, or both entangled .and looped and take on a delustered appearance.

One manner of achieving the increased fiber stiflness is to increase the denier per filament of the individual filaments in the spinning of the fibers. A useful process and apparatus for carrying out this process is disclosed in my United States Patent No. 2,920,345. Other methods such as the random spot application of starchy or resinous sizing material to the yarn would also result in increased fiber stiffness or yarn coherence which would resist any treatment which would tend to separate, entangle, or loop the individual filaments.

In further detail, there would first be prepared a multifilament yarn having areas or zones of increased stiffness. The exact manner of making such yarn is not a limitation on the present invention and the yarn may be prepared by dry spinning, wet spinning, melt spinning or the like pnocedures. As pointed out above, I would prefer to employ a method generally in accordance with the method shown in my earlier Patent 2,920,345. A suitable spinning dope would be extruded into filaments. As the freshly spun still deformable filaments emerge from the spinnerette they are drafted in a variable manner as fully explained in said 1 atent to produce a multifilament yarn having zones of increased denier, thickness and stifiFness. The magnitude of the increased stifiness and other details will be further apparent from the examples which follow. In a similar manner melt spun polyester, polyamide and the like filaments may be processed to produce the zones of increased thickness and, hence, increase stiffness of the yarn. Or, wet spun acrylic fibers may be suitably made with enlarged or thickened sections. Or, any of the above type yarns of various compositions produced by conventional procedures may be reated with sizes, or polymeric bonding agents or the like at different zones on the multifilament yarn to produce zones of stiffness. It will be noted that this phase of the process may be carried out with existing apparatus and known procedures.

Then, in accordance with the broader aspects of the present invention, such multifilarnent yarns with sections or zones of increased stiffness, however produced, are passed through suitable high velocity fluid jets and blown with air or other gaseous fluid of a predetermined velocity. I have found that the areas of increased stiffness remain substantially unaffected whereas the non-stiff areas assume a dull appearance. Reference is here made to FIGURES 1, 2, 3, 4, and on the attached drawings forming a part of this application.

FIGURE 1 is a 200 power enlargement showing the longitudinal arrangement of a large denier per filament yarn.

FIGURE 2 is a 200 power enlargement of a longitudinal View of a sized multifilament yarn bundle.

FIGURE 3 is a 200 power enlargement of a longitudinal view of an entangled multifilament yarn.

FIGURE 4 is a power enlargement of a longitudinal view of three strands of an entangled and looped multifilament yarn.

FIGURE 5 is a schematic drawing depicting the general surface appearance of a fabric containing the yarns of this invention as filling.

'FIGURE 6 is a schematic drawing representing the type yarn described in Examples I, III, IV, and V.

FIGURE 7 is a schematic drawing of the yarn product described in Example VII.

FIGURE 8 is a schematic drawing of the yarn product described in Example VIII.

In the case where the increased stiffness is due to an increase in the denier per filament size of the filaments, the increased section modulus or resistance to bending of these heavier filaments causes them to resist treatment and remain in a substantially parallel loose state as shown in FIG. 1. In the case where the increased stiffness of the yarn is achieved by application of a size or filament bonding material, the forces of the fluid jet treatment are inadequate to break the interfilament size bond, and the filaments remain closely compacted and parallel as shown in FIG. 2. In both cases the high degree of parallelism of the filaments results in a high light reflectance value, making the yarn appear lustrous.

On the other hand, in areas where the filaments are of lesser size and have a low section modulus or resistance to bending or where the filaments are not bonded together, the action of the fiuid jet treatment causes them to become entangled as shown in FIG. 3 or to become both entangled and looped as shown in FIG. 4. In both the instance of filament entanglement or entanglement and loopiness, the parallelism of the fiber is destroyed; and the reflectance of light from the yarn becomes diffuse, giving the yarn a dulled or delustered appearance.

I have further found that such procedure for making variable luster yarns is more rapid and economical than the prior art procedures. I have also found certain preferred relationships and other refinemens for blowing the yarn as aforesaid in order to obtain the most desirable variable luster yarn, all as will be set forth hereinafter.

Referring now to FIG. 5 a fabric has been illustrated which contains the variable luster yarn of the present invention. It will be noted that certain portions of the yarn 7 and 8 stand out in the fabric in contrast to other portions 9.

A further understanding ofmy invention will be had from a consideration of the following examples which are set forth to illustrate certain preferred embodiments.

v4 Example I A 450 denier bright luster cellulose acetate continuous multifilament yarn, composed of 114 filaments was extruded at 300 m./n1. At randomly spaced intervals the denier of the individual filaments was increased from approximately 3.94 to a value of 15.8 or in a ratio of 4 to 1. As a result, the stiffness or relative resistance to bending of the enlarged zones of the filaments was increased by a ratio of about 16 to 1. The process and apparatus used for producing this variation in denier was as disclosed in Patent 2,920,345.

The spun yarn was wound up with .3 t.p.i. twist on a conventional bobbin. The bobbin of yarn was then subjected to a bulking process in the apparatus disclosed in Dyer 2,924,868. Surprisingly, it was found that if the apparatus was set up as in the following table, the areas of increased fiber stiffness were not treated but remained smooth, lustrous, and silky in appearance with a denier of about 1800 as shown in FIG. 1; whereas, the areas of decreased fiber denier and stiffness were looped and entangled as shown in FIG. 4 and had a rough, dull, worsted-like appearance and a denier of only 550.

The jet setup was as follows:

Diameter of inlet to nozzle 12 inches .125 Diameter of outlet of nozzle 8 do .047 Diameter of orifice hold 31 do .094 Included angle of nozzle 8 degrees 60 Included angle of orifice 20 do Entrance angle of venturi 22 do 35 Venturi throat diameter 23 inches .106 Venturi throat length 23 do .062 Venturi exit angle 24 degrees 10 Air pressure p.s.i. gage 8 The yarn produced is schematically represented by the drawing of FIGURE 6. In this drawing the width of the yarn has been enlarged much more than the length for the purpose of more clearly illustrating the yarn structure. It will be noted that in the areas 7 and 8 the large diameter filaments remain substantially parallel and lustrous, while in the area 9 of small filament diameter and stiffness, the filaments are entangled and looped. It should also be noted that the effective over-all diameter of the yarn in the areas of filament entanglement and loopiness is substantially the same as the over-all diameter of yarn in the areas of increased filament diameter and stiffness.

Example II The run of Example I was repeated using the same spun yarn but using an inlet nozzle of .156 inlet diameter and .145" outlet diameter, an orifice hole diameter of .177", a Venturi throat diameter of .189", and an air pressure of 20 psi. gage. The more violent action of this jet caused the stiffer filaments to become looped and entangled; and a variable luster or hand variation could not be detected along the yarn strand as in Example I. In addition, the bulk or diameter of this yarn varied along its length with the areas of stiff filament loopiness being larger in diameter than the areas of loopy low filament stiffness.

Example III A 2700 denier multifilament cellulose bright luster acetate yarn, composed of filaments having a nominal denier of '16 but with a denier per filament of 64 at randomly spaced intervals was spun. The filaments varied in stiffness by a factor of 16 to 1. This yarn was treated in the jet of Example II. The action of the jet was inadequate to cause any looping or entangling of the filaments in the areas of increased stiffness along the yarn strand. These areas remained relatively smooth and lustrous as in FIG. 1 with a total denier of about 10,800, while the zones of the yarn containing the smaller, less stiff filaments were roughened and loopy in appearance and had a denier of about 3100 as shown in FIG. 4. The appearance of this yarn is depicted in FIGURE 6.

Example IV A 600 denier 152 filament bright luster cellulose acetate continuous multifilament yarn was spun in such a manner that the nominal filament denier of about 4 was increased at random intervals, averaging 8 yards apart to a denier of 20. 'llie resultant increase in stiifness was in the ratio of 25 to 1 in the thickened areas of the filaments. This yarn was treated in the bulking jet of Example I. The filaments in the areas of increased fiber stiffness remained unentangled and unlooped as in FIG. 1 and the yarn was smooth and lustrous in appearance in these zones. The denier of the yarn in these zones was about 3000. In the areas of low fiber stiffness, the filaments were looped and entangled as in FIG. 4 and had a rough, dull appearance and a denier of only 700. When woven as filling in a satin weave fabric, the fabric had an over-all dull sheen high-lighted by randomly occurring short streaks of a polished silver like luster with the result that the fabric had a unique novel and appealing ap pearance not heretofore obtainable in woven fabrics. Measurements of the specular reflectance of the bright luster areas gave a reading of 74, while the reflectance of the delustered areas of the yarn was only 16. The attached PEG. 5 depicts the appearance of this yarn with 7 and 8 denoting the lustrous areas and 9 denoting the areas of reduced luster. In the foregoing example the volume of the lustrous slub exceeded that of the delustered bulky yarn areas by a factor of about 5 to 3. For many fabric applications this emphasis by reason of volume or size in the lustrous area is desirable. In other applications it may be desirable to maintain the effective diameter or size of the yarn constant. Experience has shown that the process of bulking or looping a yarn by an air jet results in an effective volume increase of about 3/ 1 even though the denier of the yarn is increased only by a factor of about 1.25/1. By proper adjustment of the apparatus used in spinning a yarn, the variation in denier of the yarn can also be readily adjusted to a value of bout 3/ 1. Thus, it is possible, as explained herein, to produce a yam of constant effective diameter size wherein the areas of increased filament size are smooth and lustrous and the areas of lesser filament size are rough and dull. The appearance of this yarn is depicted in FIGURE 6.

Example V A 300 denier bright luster 4 d./ f. cellulose acetate yarn was spun using a variable denier apparatus attachment such that in randomly spaced areas the filament denier was increased to 12, and the fiber stiffness was increased by a factor of about 9 to 1. The yarn was then treated in the apparatus of Example I. The finished yarn had randomly occurring lengths like FIG. 1 of smooth, bright lustrous yarn and rough, dull yarn as in FIG. 4 but was substantially uniform in diameter throughout its length. When woven as filling into a fabric, the uniformity of size was demonstrated by the absence of distorted parallelism or linearity of the filling yarns which would otherwise have occurred if the yarn had varied in diameter along its length. 'Ihe appearance of this yarn is depicted in FIG- URE 6.

Example V1 In the foregoing examples the filament size was increased to achieve the desired resistance to filament entanglement and looping in the jet. In this Example VI a 300 denier, 4 d./f. bright luster cellulose acetate yard was spun, and at random intervals a fiber bonding material in the form of a solution of polyvinyl alcohol was applied, causing the filaments in the areas of application to become stuck or bonded together. When this yarn was treated in the jet of Example I, the sized lengths of yarn were uneifected by the treatment and remained smooth and lustrous with a denier of 300, While in the lengths of unbonded yarn filaments, the filaments became entangled and looped with the yarn increasing to a denier of 350. When woven as filling in a fabric and scoured and finished to remove the size, the formerly sized yarn lengths appeared lustrous and smooth, while the unsized lengths were rough in texture and dull in appearance as shown in FIG. 5.

Example VII In the foregoing examples, when treating the yarn in the jet, the yarn was overfed to the jet by an amount of not less than 10% and usually at least 2.0% so that the filaments might become both entangled and looped as described in my Patent 2,924,868. In some cases it may be desirable to avoid the drastic change in fabric hand and texture caused by a loopy filament bulk yarn and retain a smooth yarn hand or appearance. In. such instances the yarn may be passed through the fluid jet with only sufiicient slackness or absence of tension to allow the filaments to entangle but not to loop. As noted in my patent application Serial No. 400,544, of which this is a continuation in part, and in my copending continuation in part, Serial No. 75,396, it is possible to decrease the slackness in yarn tension in the jet by reducing the overfeed of the yarn so that the yarn retains substantially the same smooth appearance as a normal untreated yarn but still attain a degree of interfilarnent disarray or entanglement. If the amount of overfeed of the yarn is in the order of 0-2%, the luster of the yarn is not substantially reduced but if the overfeed is in the order of 2l5%, the filaments can be entangled with sufiicient frequency and severity as to cause a marked deluste-ring of the yarn but without, at the same time, causing any filament loopiness that would ronghen the yarn. A similar delustering effect is noted in untreated yarn as the twist is increased, and the following table shows the approximate relationship between luster and twist and the conditions required to achieve an equivalent eifect by filament entanglement by varying the overfeed of the yarn treated in a fluid jet.

While the foregcin g values in the table may vary in some degree depending on the particular yarn composition, jet design, and process used in testing the yarn, they show the general relationships which exist. Putting into practice the unique effects shown by this table, the 450 denier spun yarn of Example I was processed as before except that the overfeed of the yarn was reduced to 5% so that the lengths of heavy denier per filament yarn were unaffected and remained smooth and lustrous with a denier of 1800 as in FIG. 1, while the lengths of normal 4 denier/filament yarn, as a result of the jet treatment, were caused to incur a very heavy degree of filament entanglement but without any loopiness as shown in FIG. 3, while the denier of the yarn in these entangled lengths remained substantially 450 denier. When woven into fabric as filling, the fabric had much the same dull appearance with lustrous streaks as shown in FIG. 5, but the hand of the fabric was smooth and silklike all over; whereas, in Example I it was rough and wool-like.

The yarn of this example is depicted in FIGURE 7. Here it will be noted that the lengths of yarn 7 and 8 which remain lustrous and are of a large diameter are composed of substantially parallel filaments, while the area 9 containing the filaments of low stiffness are delustered 'by the several multifilament entanglements.

'2' Example VIII '70 denier, 33 filament per twist bright luster drawn polyester yarn was processed so that, at random intervals of about one yard on the average along its length, it was brought into contact with a size applicator; and a 3% solids solution of a water soluble acrylic binder was applied over :a length of about 3 inches and cured. When this yarn was subjected to the fluid jet treatment at 20 psi. air pressure and with an overfeed of 6%, the sized lengths remained untreated and lustrous; and the unsized lengths became characterized by a notable degree of interfilament entanglement such that they appeared delustered. The denier of the yarn in both the treated and untreated lengths of yarn was substantially unchanged a 70.

The appearance of this yarn is depicted in FIGURE 8. The areas 7 and 8 which were subjected to the filament binding treatment containing filaments which are substantially parallel give a lustrous appearance, while the filaments in the unsized areas are heavily entangled and give the delustered appearance in the area designated as 9.

While the examples used to describe this invention have primarily related to bright luster cellulose acetate yarn, yarns of other compositions such as acrylics, modacrylics, polyesters, polyamides, and polyolefins prepared by melt spinning or other procedures may be treated in a comparable manner with similar results.

While specific methods or apparatus for varying the stilfness of the filaments and for treating them in an air jet have been used for illustrative purposes, the specific variable denier apparatus or type of air treating jet as indicated above is not a limiting factor. The present invention resides to a susbtantial extent in the discovery that fibers of increased stiffness entangle or loop less readily than those of loW stiffness and that this can be elfectively utilized by selection of the conditions of treating a yarn containing randomly occurring areas where all the filaments are of greater stiifness so that these areas of increased stiffness do not respond to the treatment; whereas, the areas of low fiber stiffness do respond. It also resides in the fact that an intermittently bulked yarn can be made wherein the actual diameter of the yarn remains constant or is greater in the areas of no bulk treatment than in the areas that responded to the bulk treatment.

The invention has been described in considerable detail with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be elfected within the spirit and scope of the invention as described hereinabove, and as defined in the appended claims.

I claim:

1. The process of producing a randomly lustrous and non-lustrous yarn which comprises increasing the stiffness of the filaments in selected random lengths of the yarn to the extent of at least 9 times compared to the nonstiff lengths and subjecting said yarn to a high velocity gaseous treatment such that said stitf length remain smooth and lustrous and are unaffected by high velocity gaseous treatment which causes the filaments in the zones of decreased stiffness to become entangled an assume a rough, delustered appearance.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein the stiffness of the filaments and the pressure of the high velocity gas are correlated so that said pressure is insulficient to materially change the said stifi, random lengths in said filaments.

3. The process of making a novel yarn having zones of luster which are of approximately the same denier as zones of low luster in said yarn, which comprises spinning a multifilament yarn with predetermined zones of increased denier and stiffness and wherein the other zones are of a denier correlated to the zones of still denier, subjecting said multifilament yarn to treatment in a jet with high velocity gas whereby said other zones are increased to a diameter approximately the diameter of said zones of increased denier and stiffness.

4. As a new article of manufacture a yarn containing smooth lustrous zones free from filament entanglement and loopiness and other zones of a rough loopy delustered appearance wherein the lustrous zones are of greater bulkiness than the delustered looped filament zones.

5. The process which comprises obtaining a multifilament yarn of a denier per filament from 4-100, which yarn has stilf zones, which stilf zones are several times stiffer than the other zones of the yarn, which process includes feeding the aforesaid yarn through a bulking jet supplied with high velocity gas whereby the still zones remain smooth and lustrous and are substantially unaffected and the remainder of the yarn acquires a low luster appearance and wherein the stilf zones are obtained by applying a filament binding media.

6. As a new article of manufacture a yarn containing smooth, lustrous zones free from filament entanglement and loopiness and other zones of a rough entangled delustered appearance, wherein the lustrous zones are of a greater bulkiness than the delustered entangled \filament zones.

References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,852,906 Breen Sept. 23, 1958 2,931,090 Field Apr. 5, 1960 2,939,202 Holland June 7, 1960 2,978,788 Keefe Apr. 11, 1961 3,042,482 Woodell July 3, 1962 FOREIGN PATENTS 776,410 Great Britain June 5, l957 828,641 Great Britain Feb. 24, 1960

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2852906 *Aug 20, 1953Sep 23, 1958Du PontMethod and apparatus for producing bulky continuous filament yarn
US2931090 *Sep 18, 1956Apr 5, 1960Du PontTextile apparatus
US2939202 *Dec 31, 1959Jun 7, 1960Du PontSynthetic polymer textile filament
US2978788 *Jul 13, 1955Apr 11, 1961Du PontProcess for treating synthetic yarn
US3042482 *Nov 23, 1959Jul 3, 1962Du PontProcess and apparatus for wet spinning slub yarn
GB776410A * Title not available
GB828641A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3413701 *Jun 28, 1966Dec 3, 1968American Enka CorpProduction of entangled novelty yarn
US3458987 *Aug 14, 1967Aug 5, 1969Mitsubishi Rayon CoJet bundle yarn
US3477220 *Oct 4, 1967Nov 11, 1969Kendall & CoDraftable novelty yarns and process therefor
US3811263 *Feb 23, 1972May 21, 1974Phillips Petroleum CoNon-twisted, heather yarn and method for producing same
US4143199 *Oct 19, 1976Mar 6, 1979Rhone-Poulenc-TextileTextile elements of nodular appearance, processes for their manufacture and articles produced with such elements
US4152886 *Dec 7, 1977May 8, 1979E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And CompanyProcess for making yarn having alternate sections of greater and less bulk and product thereof
US4169349 *Aug 29, 1977Oct 2, 1979Fiber Industries, Inc.Production of simulated spun-like bulked yarn
US4228640 *Feb 1, 1979Oct 21, 1980Fiber Industries, Inc.Simulated spun-like ingrain yarn
US4277297 *Dec 12, 1979Jul 7, 1981Educational Health Products, Inc.Method of forming dental floss with string and brush portions
US4324095 *Jan 11, 1978Apr 13, 1982E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And CompanyProcess for preparing slub yarns
US4347287 *Aug 14, 1980Aug 31, 1982Lord CorporationSegmented pultrusions comprising continuous lengths of fiber having selected areas along the lengths containing resin matrix impregnations
US5102735 *Jul 26, 1988Apr 7, 1992Toray Industries, Inc.Eddy current, then heat treatment
US5312677 *Dec 11, 1991May 17, 1994Toray Industries, Inc.Latent looped yarn, a fabric made of the same, and a method for manufacturing the latent looped yarn
US5447590 *May 24, 1993Sep 5, 1995Milliken Research CorporationMethod to produce looped fabric with upstanding loops
US6203645Apr 29, 1996Mar 20, 2001Milliken & CompanyFemale connector fabric
US6203880Jan 23, 1997Mar 20, 2001Milliken & CompanyFemale connector fabric
USRE29352 *May 19, 1976Aug 16, 1977Phillips Petroleum CompanyNon-twisted, heather yarn and method for producing same
U.S. Classification428/369, 28/271, 427/170, 428/399, 57/208, 428/400, 57/908, 428/401
International ClassificationD02G1/16
Cooperative ClassificationD02G1/162, Y10S57/908
European ClassificationD02G1/16C