Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3103217 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateSep 10, 1963
Filing dateMay 18, 1961
Priority dateMay 18, 1961
Publication numberUS 3103217 A, US 3103217A, US-A-3103217, US3103217 A, US3103217A
InventorsButler Jacob C, Haley Richard M
Original AssigneeWilliam Getz Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
US 3103217 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Sept. 10, 1963 .1. c. BUTLER ETAL MOUTHPIECE Filed May 18, 1961 nHlN II-IEE INVENTORS Richard M, Haley BY Jacob C. Bufler W,% ZZMM Q'fiys United States Patent 3,103,217 MOUTHPIECE Jacob C. Butler, Flossmoor, 111., and Richard M. Haley,

Racine, Wis., assignors to The William Getz Corporation, Chicago, 111., a corporation of Illinois Filed May 18, 1961, Ser. No. 110,962 1 Claim. (61. 128-136) This invention relates to the production of mouthpieces adapted to prevent injuries to the teeth and mouth of football players, boxers and others engaged in contact sports and similar undertakings.

It is a well known fact that athletes engaged in contact sports are particularly susceptible to damage to the teeth and mouth. The use of protective headgear with face guards has not proved satisfactory insofar as elimination of such injuries is concerned. Such devices, for example, afford no protection for blows coming upward toward the athletes head, and some protective headgear is not effective for stopping all direct and side blows.

The use of mouthpieces has not totally filled the gap left by present protective headgear. The basic deficiencies of present mouthpieces include the fact that they are bulky and ill fitting, thus greatly impairing normal breathing and speech. Unimpaired breathing is of course a prime consideration for a person engaged in strenuous activity, andnormal speech is important in such sports as football where signals must be relayed. Furthermore, the general discomfort will naturally tend to reduce the capacity of an individual for an all-out performance.


I FIGURE 3; and

In an attempt to ease the discomfort in wearing of mouthpieces, the thickness of the pieces between the upper and lower teeth has been decreased to permit near normal spread of the jaws. This approach has not been practical since the designs of the resulting mouthpieces were susceptible to failure due to biting through by the wearer.

An additional defect of present mouthpieces resides in the fact that they areworn on the upper teeth. This positioning makes it difficult to hold the piece in place and unduly impairs tongue freedom, thus afiecting normal speech and breathing. Furthermore, there is no means provided in such mouthpieces for preventing relative sliding movement between the upper and lower jaws. This leads to mandible fracture since the lower jaw is susceptible to side blows even where a protective headgear is worn. p a

All of the above factors have led to general disfavor among athletes with regard to mouthpieces, there being a general reluctance to use them. It therefore becomes an object of this invention to provide a safe and comfortable mouthpiece for use by football players, boxers and others engaged in contact sports and similar undertakings.

It is a further object of this invention to provide an improved mouthpiece which supplements the protection given by protective headgear presently in use.

It is an additional object of this invention to provide an improved protective mouthpiece which eliminates the bulky and ill fitting characteristics of present mouthpieces which produce general discomfort and greatly impair speech and breathing.

It is a further object of this invention to eliminate defects in present mouthpieces which are fitted on the upper teeth, the improved mouthpieces thus decreasing the susceptibility of the wearer to jaw injuries and the like.

These and other objects of this invention will appear hereinafter and for purposes of illustration, but not of limitation, specific embodiments of this invention are shown in the accompanying drawings, in which FIGURE 1 is a side view partly in section of a mouth,- piece characterized by the features of this invention;

FIGURE 8' is a bottom view of the improved mouthpiece shown in FIGURE 2.

The mouthpiece which is characterized by the features of this invention may be generally described as a channelshaped member having a base portion with the walls depending from the base portion. The channel-shaped member is adapted to fit snugly over the lower teeth of the wearer with the interior side of the base portion of the channel being indented to substantially conform to the contour of the lower teeth. The exterior side of the base portion is indented to substantially conform to the contour of the upper teeth of the wearer. A special embodiment of the mouthpiece of this invention includes an up standing flange portion formed on the exterior side of the base which is adapted to provide support for the lingual portion of the anterior teeth of the wearer.

The preferred method for manufacturing the protective mouthpieces of this invention includes the use of a core member having the general shape 'of the finished article and around which the mouthpiece material is built up.

In the drawings, there is shown a mouthpiece 2 comprised of a base portion 4 and depending wall portions 6 forming'a generally channel-shaped article. Indentations '8 formed in the base portion interior of the channel will correspond exactly to the contour of the lower teeth of the wearer. indentations 10 formed in the base portion exterior of the channel will similarly correspond to the to provide support for the exposed portion of the upper anterior teeth.

It will be apparent that the positioning of the mouthpiece on the lower jaw in combination with theco'nforming indentations for the upper and lower teeth will provide several distinct advantages. There is with this arrangement no difliculty in holding the piece in the mouth since it will be held by gravity in addition to the snug fit occasioned by conforming of the piece to the teeth. Furthermore, this position has been found to improve tongue freedom, and therefore speech impairments are greatly alleviated. Due to the tendency of the piece to stay in place, near normal breathing is also possible with this arrangement.

The design afforded has vbeen found to improve the safety of use due to the provision of conforming indentations for both the upper 'and lower teeth and due to the function of the flange 12. With regard to the former distinction, the wearers teeth will be held in place in a manner which will resist relative movements between the upper and lower jaws. Thus, the indentations for both the upper and lower teeth effectively provide a plurality of barriers which will materially reduce the number of mandible fractures. It is apparent that this arrangement 3 will not impair speech or breathing since the upper teeth may be readily parted from the piece by the wearer.

The flange 12 serves to prevent injury to the upper teeth which could result tfirom direct blows. The flange effectively acts as a backing support cushioning direct blows and avoids fracture and injury of the anterior upper teeth.

FIGURES 3 through 7 illustrate in various views a core 14 which is preferably employed in the manufacture of the mouthpieces 2. The core is of channel-shape corresponding generally to the outline of the lower teeth of the prospective wearer. The core is provided with an upstanding, centrally located flange 16 in order that the flange 12 may be built up thereon. Orifices 18 are preferably formed in the base of the core to enable uniform distribution of the mouthpiece material during the forming operation.

In order to form a mouthpiece having the characteristics of this invention, a material which will permanently set in a durable but flexible manner is a necessary requirement. Such materials include thermo-setting plastic silicone rubbers, mastic type fillers which are heated prior to the formation of the desired impressions, and plasticized methyl methacrylate which remains resilient and flexible, particularly at month temperatures. Materials having similar properties and materials presently used in the production of mouthpieces are also contemplated.

, The material selected will be fitted in the mouth of the wearer in a formable, impressionable condition and the teeth indentations 8 and 10 and the flange 12 will then be molded into a generally channel-shaped construction. The core 14 is preferably employed in the manufacture of these articles since it simplifies building up of the contour mouthpiece. Where employed, the channel-shaped core generally having the outline of the lower teeth is selected, and the impressionable material having the aforementioned properties is placed Within and about the core member. In this manner, the upper and lower im pressions are readily taken, and, because of the flange 16, the flange 12 on the mouthpiece can be accurately positioned. The orifices 18 aid in uniformly spreading the impressionable material on either side of the core element.

In the building up of the impressionable material, it has been found preferable to provide a mouthpiece having a maximum spacing of about 3 mm. between the upper and lower teeth. A thicker mouthpiece will lead to discomfort due to excess unnatural spacing, and a thinner base wall 'will increase the tendency toward biting through the piece.

The core material should have the same properties with regard to durability and flexibility as the material placed thereabout in the manufacturing sequence. It is therefore contemplated that both materials be of the same composition although, of course, the core will be permanently set prior to use.

Various other methods of manufacture which will produce the novel mouthpiece of this invention are contemplated. The mouthpieces produced are believed to provide maximum protection, while at the same time giving adequate'tongue room and stability within the mouth of the wearer. In addition to the improved speech and breathing possibilities, a non-sliding fit with regard to the upper and lower teeth is accomplished due to the firm seat provided for the teeth. The instant design in addition provides cushion support by means of the flange 12 for the lingual side of the upper anterior teeth, and the design permits the use of a relatively thin 3 mm. spacing between the upper and lower teeth, thus increasing the comfort during use. a

It will be understood that various changes may be made in the above disclosed protective mouthpiece and in the methods of its manufacture which'provide the characteristics of this invention without departing from the spirit of the invention, particularly as defined in the following claim.

We claim:

A mouthpiece for the protection against injury to the teeth and mouth of the wearer comprising a generally channel-shaped, flexible core having a base portion, a centrally located flange portion extending upwardly from the rear side of said base portion and having channel'- defining walls depending downwardly from the base portion, said core being imbedded in an outer body of flexible material, said outer body comprising a channel shaped member having a base portion with channeldefinin-g Walls depending downwardly therefrom, said outer body being adapted to fit over the lower teeth of the wearer, the interior side of the base portion of said outer body being indented to substantially conform to the contour of the lower teeth, and. the exterior side of the base of said outer body being indented to substantially conform to the contour of the upper teeth, the base portion of said outer body being free of upwardly extending walls except for the centrally located flange portion extending upwardly from the rear side of the outer body, said flange portion of said core being imbedded in this flange portion associated with the outer body, the extent of said flange portion of the outer body being limited whereby it is adapted to fit behind only the upper anterior teeth of the wearer.

References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,979,493 Salvio Nov. 6, 1934 2,192,558 Poindexte-r Mar. 5, 1940 2,678,043 Stark May 11, 1954 2,706,478 Porter Apr. 19, 1955 2,827,899 Altieri Mar. 25, 1958 2,919,693 Ross Jan. 5, 1960 2,966,908 Cathcart Jan. 3, 1961

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1979493 *Nov 13, 1930Nov 6, 1934Salvio Salvatore RDental impression form
US2192558 *Jun 29, 1937Mar 5, 1940Poindexter James BTooth guard and jaw protector
US2678043 *Dec 18, 1951May 11, 1954Emanuel StarkMouth appliance
US2706478 *May 5, 1952Apr 19, 1955Malcolm Porter MauriceDevice for use with musical instruments
US2827899 *Dec 6, 1954Mar 25, 1958James Altieri DomenicoTooth guard and jaw protector
US2919693 *Feb 26, 1958Jan 5, 1960Ross Harold MMouthpiece
US2966908 *Jan 27, 1958Jan 3, 1961Cathcart Jack FUniversal mouth protector
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3207153 *Dec 3, 1962Sep 21, 1965Harry J Bosworth CompanyMouth protector device
US3236235 *Nov 8, 1963Feb 22, 1966Madison Dental CoProtective mouthpiece
US3385291 *Dec 20, 1965May 28, 1968Leonard G. MartinDental device
US3386732 *Jul 29, 1966Jun 4, 1968Betty N. RobinsOral facial exerciser
US3407808 *Sep 2, 1964Oct 29, 1968Howmet CorpDental mouthguard
US3513838 *Oct 11, 1967May 26, 1970Dammermann Arnold BTeeth protector
US3518988 *Dec 5, 1967Jul 7, 1970Gores Kenneth WMouthguard
US5293880 *Oct 2, 1991Mar 15, 1994Levitt Steven JAthletic mouthguard
US5469865 *Jun 2, 1994Nov 28, 1995Minneman; Sue A. F.Mouthguard having an extra-oral portion and an intra-oral portion
US5533524 *Sep 12, 1995Jul 9, 1996Minneman; Sue A. F.Mouthguard having an extra-oral portion and an intra-oral portion
US8607798Jun 2, 2011Dec 17, 2013Shock Doctor, Inc.Custom mouthguard
US8689796May 17, 2011Apr 8, 2014Shock Doctor, Inc.Mouthguard with linear storage configuration
U.S. Classification128/862, D24/156
International ClassificationA63B71/08
Cooperative ClassificationA63B71/085
European ClassificationA63B71/08M