Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3107566 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateOct 22, 1963
Filing dateMar 31, 1960
Priority dateMar 31, 1960
Publication numberUS 3107566 A, US 3107566A, US-A-3107566, US3107566 A, US3107566A
InventorsArcher William Winter
Original AssigneeControls Co Of America
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method of preventing binding of strip material in a progressive type die
US 3107566 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Oct. 22, 1963 w. w. ARCHER METHOD OF PREVENTING BINDING 0F STRIP MATERI IN A PROGRESSIVE TYPE DIE Filed March 31 1960 INVENTOR. WILL.\AMW.ARCHER BY /g ATTORNEY United States Patent 3,107,566 METHOD OF PREVENTING BINDING 0F STRIP MATERIAL IN A PROGRESSIVE TYPE DIE William Winter Archer, Corunna, Mich assignor to Controls Company of America, Schiller Park, 11]., a corporation of Delaware Filed Mar. 31, 1960, Ser. No. 19,095 3 Claims. (Cl. 83-33) This invention relates to a method for maintaining proper alignment of coil stock at successive steps in a multiple step die and particularly for preventing binding within the die as the stock is advanced therethrough.

Progressive type dies require from two to as many as ten stations in which the stamping operations are to be completed. It is essential that the stock be properly aligned at each successive die station in order to assure that all diameters and dimensions are punched within allowable limitations. Die pilot pins are provided at each successive station to align the stock at that station. Because an overall clearance of approximately ten onethousandths of an inch is allowed between the high limit of the material width and the two rows of pilot guides in the die, any curvature or camber in the stock will cause serious binding between the guides and the pins with the end result that the stock is difficult to feed and the product is not within dimensional tolerance.

Slitting mills provide coil stock with a certain amount of camber up to a maximum limit of one-quarter inch in eight feet of length which increases the problem of binding in progressive type dies. In as much as this is in excess of the above requirement, stock which is supplied with the maximum amount of camber is practically unusable. This has been a problem facing the industry for some time without any solution, and the slitting mills have so far been unable to reduce the camber to within practical limits.

The primary object of this invention, therefore, is to provide a method for preventing binding of cambered coil stock in progressive type dies.

This object has been achieved by slotting the stock from the edge of the stock toward the center. The slotting operation is completed at the first station of the die between each blank as the material is fed into the die. A narrow neck of stock is then left between the blanks to flex or bend so the pilot pins at each station can properly align the stock for punching to produce the finished stamping.

Other objects and advantages will be apparent from the specification and claims as will obvious modifications of the drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 shows maximum allowable camber in material supplied by slitting mills;

FIG. 2 shows the stock slotted as fed into the die;

FIG. 3 shows the progressive cutting steps made by the die;

FIG. 4 shows the final cutting steps.

Camber is a term applied only to the width of the coil stock and is a condition of edge curvature as viewed upon the top surface of the material. The condition may occur in continuous or serpentine manner and is detrimental to proper feeding through the many stations in progressive ice type dies. As seen in FIG. 1, maximum allowable camber in coil stock 10 supplied by slitting mills is onequarter inch per eight feet of length. If this material is fed into a progressive type die it will bind between the guide posts and the pilot pins provided in the die so that the diameters and dimensions will not be punched within allowable limitations.

In the drawings, the punching operations are shown with respect to laminations for motors. As seen in FIG. 2, slots 14 are cut into each side of the coil stock as it is fed into the die to allow the stock to flex or bend at connecting necks 16. The slots are cut between successive lamination blanks 18 to keep the stock in a single strip for easier feeding through the die while allowing for a certain amount of bending between blanks to compensate for any camber which may exist in the stock. It can be seen that even Where the camber is serpentine the stock will straighten out When fed through the die.

In FIGS. 3 and 4 the progressive stamping steps are shown for a typical die operation. At step 1 slots 14 are punched out leaving neck 16 connecting blanks 18. Simultaneous with this operation four pilot guide holes 20 are punched which are aligned with guide pins to guide the stock through the die. At step 2 pilot pin holes 22 are punched so that at each successive step the blank will be aligned on pilot pins for the next punching operation. In step 2 perforations 24 are also punched along with the pilot pin holes. The stock is then advanced one step by the guide pins until pilot pin holes are aligned with the pilot pins at step 3 where the rotor and first stator blanks are punched out leaving centrally located hole 26. The stock is again advanced until the pilot pin holes are aligned with the pilot pins at step 4 where stator slots 28 are punched out. In step 5 corners 30 are removed and at step 6 corners 32 are removed and the final stator lamination 34 is cut off from neck 16. The guide pin holes used to move the stock through the die may be used to align the blanks when they are assembled for use. It will be noted that only the neck 16 connects the blanks as they are moved through the die so that any misalignment due to camber will be compensated for by the flexibility of the neck.

This solution has resulted in a greatly improved final product and has insured smooth feeding of coil stock. Furthermore, the suppliers of coil stock have been relieved from the problem of attempting to reduce the amount of camber to assure better operation of progressive type dies.

Although only one embodiment of the invention is shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the spirit of the invention or from the scope of the appended claims.

I claim:

1. A method of preventing binding of a strip of cambered coil stock in a progressive type die comprising:

feeding a strip of coil stock into a die,

slotting said stock at the first station of the die to form a lamination blank connected to the strip by a neck of material substantially narrower than the width of the coil stock,

punching at least two pilot pin holes in said lamination at each side of the strip,

progressively advancing said strip through the die, and

aligning said lamination in the successive stations of the die by pilot pin means which engages said pilot pin holes thereby bending said neck to compensate for any camber of said coil stock.

2. A method according to claim 1 wherein guide holes are punched in said coil stock and said stock is advanced through the die by guide pins engaging said guide holes.

3. A method according to claim 2 wherein said coil stock is slotted at said first station to provide substantially equal slots on both sides of said coil stock.

References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS Grifiith Nov. 5, 1901 Randall Dec. 12, 1933 Benson July 8, 1947 Miller Nov. 23, 1948 Moody Nov. 21, 1950 Pierce June 5, 1956 Berg Jan. 22, 1957 Swick July 12, 1960 FOREIGN PATENTS Denmark Dec. 22, 1919

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US685758 *Apr 2, 1901Nov 5, 1901William GriffithUniting or welding metals.
US1939631 *Sep 1, 1932Dec 12, 1933Randall CompanyStaple blank or strip and method of making same
US2423750 *Jul 3, 1943Jul 8, 1947Gibson Refrigerator CoMethod of assembling electric motors
US2454609 *Feb 21, 1945Nov 23, 1948Acme Electric CorpMethod of making laminations
US2530533 *Nov 5, 1945Nov 21, 1950Friden Calculating Machine CoMethod of making electric motors
US2748452 *May 7, 1953Jun 5, 1956Aircraft Marine Prod IncMethods and blanks for making connectors
US2778097 *Mar 24, 1950Jan 22, 1957Aircraft Marine Prod IncStrip of taper pin connectors
US2944330 *Nov 8, 1955Jul 12, 1960Illinois Tool WorksTerminal clip structure and method and apparatus for applying same
DK25410A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3253544 *May 18, 1962May 31, 1966New Jersey Machine CorpManufacture and use of labels for bottles, containers, and the like
US3650167 *Jul 2, 1970Mar 21, 1972Gen ElectricMethod of manufacturing magnetic laminations for dynamoelectric machine
US3854359 *Mar 16, 1973Dec 17, 1974Tagami Kanagata KkApparatus for enabling automatic feed for a press with one-stamping die
US4292862 *Sep 12, 1979Oct 6, 1981Owens-Corning Fiberglas CorporationMethod and apparatus for production of a stream feeder
US4351679 *Aug 8, 1980Sep 28, 1982Culbro CorporationLabel-leaflet applying apparatus
US4624162 *Oct 7, 1985Nov 25, 1986General Electric CompanyApparatus for automatic coil feed
US4773293 *Dec 24, 1986Sep 27, 1988Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Method of and apparatus for manufacturing liner for magnetic disk
US4913015 *Sep 23, 1988Apr 3, 1990Kokusan Kogyo Kabushiki KaishaSoft material cutting apparatus
US4998430 *Jun 7, 1990Mar 12, 1991Emerson Electric Co.Manufacture of rotor lamination for a dynamoelectric machine
US5044237 *Feb 5, 1990Sep 3, 1991Magnetic Metals CorporationMethod for stamping stepper motor laminations
US5491881 *Mar 28, 1994Feb 20, 1996Collins; StuartProcess for forming roller guide frames for a fishing line
US5636432 *Nov 10, 1994Jun 10, 1997General Electric CompanyTandem press system for manufacture of stator and rotor cores
US5915750 *Feb 19, 1997Jun 29, 1999General Electric CompanyMethod of manufacturing stator and rotor cores
US6279439 *May 26, 1999Aug 28, 2001Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd.Method for manufacturing a one-way clutch cage
US6430799 *Feb 1, 2000Aug 13, 2002American Engineered Components, Inc.Method for constructing a one-piece bulbshield
US6634081 *Jun 8, 2001Oct 21, 2003Kienle & Spiess Stanz- Ung Druckgiesswerk GmbhMethod of manufacturing core laminations for laminated cores of rotors and/or stators
US6769600Apr 10, 2001Aug 3, 2004Dayton-Phoenix Group, Inc.Motor lamination notching apparatus and method with selectively positionable punches
US7249546 *May 13, 1991Jul 31, 2007Franklin Electric Co., Ltd.Die-shaping apparatus and process and product formed thereby
US7600312Jul 12, 2005Oct 13, 2009L.H. Carbide CorporationDie assembly for manufacturing lamina stacks that include formed features
US8361269 *Jul 26, 2010Jan 29, 2013Toyota Boshoku Kabushiki KaishaMethod for punching before performing rotated lamination
US20110024489 *Jul 26, 2010Feb 3, 2011Toyota Boshoku Kabushiki KaishaMethod for punching before performing rotated lamination
EP0514099A2 *May 11, 1992Nov 19, 1992FRANKLIN ELECTRIC Co., Inc.Die-shaping apparatus and process
WO1982001511A1 *Oct 29, 1981May 13, 1982Kodak Co EastmanMethod of manufacturing a film unit
WO1986001135A1 *Aug 5, 1985Feb 27, 1986John WorkmanImprovements relating to metal pressing and stamping
U.S. Classification83/33, 83/40, 29/597, 83/917, 29/609, 83/50, 83/42, 156/261, 29/417
International ClassificationB21D28/06
Cooperative ClassificationB21D28/06, Y10S83/917
European ClassificationB21D28/06