Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3108013 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateOct 22, 1963
Filing dateJan 28, 1960
Priority dateJan 28, 1960
Publication numberUS 3108013 A, US 3108013A, US-A-3108013, US3108013 A, US3108013A
InventorsChao Pao Jen, Gordon P K Chu
Original AssigneePfaudler Permutit Inc
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method of chromizing
US 3108013 A
Abstract  available in
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

06f. 22, 1963 PAO JEN cHAo E'rAL 3,108,013

METHOD OF .CHROMIZING Filed Jan. 28, 1960 m .om

Oom

CO: 00N.

Oom-

ov om ON O- Oo oom Oom

.ma Y

0 BHHLVHEdWBl INVENTORS. PAO /v H @m55-@NCR lflcochfu BYl A TTORNEYS United States Patent O M 3,108,013 METHOD OF CHROMIZING Pao Jen Chao, Scottsviile, and Gordon l. K. Chu, Spencerport, NX., assignors to Pfaudler Permutit Inc., Rochester, NSY., a corporation of New York Filed Jan. 28, 1960, Ser. No. 5,258 2 Claims. (Cl. U17-107.2)

This invention relates to a method for coating metallic objects, and more especially to a process for depositing a coating of chromium or chromium rich alloys .on the surface of base metal. In particular, this process relates to a process of depositing such coatings on ferrous Substrates, one object of this invention being the production of more satisfactory coatings then has heretofore been possible.

The process of chromizing has been carried 'on in the past lby several means. One of the more common means is the packing process wherein the object to be coated is placed in a closed container, the articles being ernbedded in a powdered material containing chromium either in the elementary `or metallic form, in the fonm of chromium rich alloys, or in fthe form of a decomposible chromium compound, together with certain carrier and inert materials. The entire container is then heated in the absence of oxygen, and the chromium deposits on the surface of the article, and diffuses inwardly forming a coating of chromium rich ferrous alloy on the surface of the article toy be coated.

Another well known means of producing such chromized coatings is by means of vapor plating. In the vapor plating process, the article to be coated is suspended in a chamber in a reducing or `oxygen free atmosphere,

and is subjected, at elevated temperatures, to a vaporized chromium compound such as the halogen or ca nbonyl compounds thereof. When rthese compounds come into contact with the heated surface of the object to be coated, decomposition or disproportionation reactions occur and lche chromium is liberated at or near lthe surface of the object to be coated. This chromium similarly deposits on and diffuses into the ferrous substrate, producing a layer of chromium. rich alloy.

Most of the chromizing processes in use today operate by the same general mechanism. In both these processes chromium is liberated at or near the surface of a heated article to be coated, and the lchromium then diffuses in- Wardly to form the chromized shell on the substrate. However, it has been found that the processes heretofore in use have certain inherent limitations which limit the thickness and quality of the chromized coating produced. When the chromium is liberated at the surface of the substrate, it diffuses inwardly, alloying itself with the ferrous substrate, producing a chromium rich alloy. This finished coating consists of a very thin surface of chromium rich alloy covering a somewhat thicker layer of alloy becoming poorer in chromium as it penetrates the ferrous substrate.

The chromizing process heretofore in use has certain inherent limitations which affect both the thickness and quality of the coating produced. In the first place, it is diticult to produce a surface having any substantial thickness of chromium or an alloy rich in chromium, and thus the portion of the coating having the desired properties is necessari-ly very thin and discontinuous. For this reason, it is another object of ythis invention to overcome the inherent shortcomings of the processes now in use by producing a coating of substantially greater thickness than has heretofore been produced by known processes.

It has been found that by use of the conventional processes, it is very difficult to produce a chromized coating on ferrous substrates having a carbon content of greater 3,103,0l3 Patented Get. 22, 1963 ICC than 0.10 percent. This appears to be due to the fact that during the diffusion coating process, the carbon in the ferrous substrate tends to diffuse outwardly and that the chromium preferentially tends to react with this carbon to form chromium carbide. The resulting layer of chrornium carbide appears to act as a diffusion barrier, preventing the further inward diffusion of chromium thus limiting the thickness of coating that may be deposited by any of the known methods. For this reason, it is another object of this invention to overcome the inherent limitations of the known processes lby providing a means whereby coatings of substantial thicknesses can be applied to ferrous substrates having substantial carbon content.

Another factor that has limited the effectiveness of the known chromizing processes is the fact that the difusivity of :chromium depends on the phase of the Iferrous substrate through which the diffusion is Itaking place. It has been found that chromium will diffuse into and through iron in the alpha phase much more readily than it will diffuse through iron in the gamma phase. However, in order to have any diffusion at all, the whole system must be maintained at elevated temperatures which will give mobility -to the atoms in the crystal structure to allow diffusion to take place. Once the iron is raised to the elevated temperature which will allow the reaction to occur, the iron undergoes a transformation at the so-called transformation point A3 which is well known in the art, wherein the iron is converted from the alpha to the gamma phase, thereby reducing drastically the dilfusivity of the chromium therein.

However, it has been found that certain additions, which `are well known inthe metallurgical art, have a profound effect on the temperature at which the transformation from alpha to ygamma iron takes place. It has also been found that the addition of these elements to the coating composition will retard or even eliminate this transformation lat `or near the surface of the ferrous su-bstrate, thereby permitting substantially increased diifusion of chromium therein. The provision of such transformation inhibiting elements in orde-r to increase diffusivity of chromium is therefore another object of this invention.

A further object of this invention is to provide a process of the character provided for producing chromium diffusion coatings of a substantially greater thickness then heretofore possible.

Another :object is the provision of a process wherein carbon eliminating or stabilizing neutralizing elements are provided to increase diffusivity of chromium.

It is another object of this invention to provide improved adherent unifonm, evenly diffused continuous coatings having surfaces rich in chromium by means of increasing the ditfusivity of the chromium and at the same time eliminating the adverse effects of carbon by the addition of certain alloying elements.

Other objects and advantages of this invention will be particularly set forth in the claims and will be apparent from the following description, when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a phase diagram of the iron aluminum system for the range between pure iron and an alloy containing 40 atomic percent aluminum showing the phases existing between 200 and 1700c C.;

FIG. 2 is a phase diagram similar to FIG. 1 showing the iron silicon system, and

FIG. 3 is a phase diagram similar to IFIGS. 1 and 2 showing the iron titanium system.

In the chromizing process, it has been found that when the conventional processes are used on steel having more than lo of one percent of carbon, that the maximumV of diffusion of the chromium into the ferrous substrate as the process continues. This decrease appears to be due to two causes; the barrier effect of chromium carbides formed when the inwardly diffusing chromium reacts with the carbon in the ferrous substrate, and the poor diusivity of chromium in iron in the `gamma phase existing at temperatures above the critical point A3.

The deleterious effects of chromium carbide formed by the preferential combination of the chromium diffusing into the substrate and the carbon diffusing outwardly can be prevented either by removing the carbon from at least the surface layers of the substrate or by supplying a material in the coating composition having an affinity for carbon greater than that of the chromium itself. The carbon can be removed from the surface layers of the substrate by conventional decarburizing processes which consist of a heat treatment cycle in a reducing atmosphere such as deassociated ammonia (75% N2 and 25%1-12) for a period ranging from approximately one-half hour to eight hours depending on the depth of decarburization desired, at a temperature of between approximately 1500" to 226G F. These decarburizing heat treatment cycles are well known in the art and is not believed that further description thereof need be included in this place.

As stated above, it is equally effective to add a material to the coating composition having an affinity for carbon `greater than that of chromium in order to tie up the car-bon in non-reactive form so that it may not combine with the chromium to form the diffusion barrier described above. Such substances however must be so chosen that they have no adverse effect upon the process. For example, although oxygen or other oxidizing substances can be used for the removal of carbon from ferrous alloys in high temperatures, the oxides thus produced would seriously interfere with the deposition of a uniform, flaw free chromized case. For this reason, the substances used must be such that they and/or their reaction products must not form a film on the surface of the ferrous substrate which would interfere with the deposition of the chromium. Preferably the substances used should also diffuse inwardly so as to leave the surface of the coated material substantially pure ferro-chromium alloys.

It has been found that small quantities of metals such as aluminum, silicon and titanium will preferentially react with carbon forming metallic carbides which do not constitute a barrier to the diffusion of chromium. At the same time, these metallic carbides have very minor or no effect on the diffusion rates of chromium into the ferrous substrates, and do not form a coating which interferes with the deposition of a surface layer of chromium. These carbon eliminating elements need only be added in relatively small quantity since the amount of carbon present in even the carbon rich ferrous alloys amounts to considerably under one percent, and the carbon must be removed only from the surface layers where the actual inward diffusion of the chromium is taking place.

The second problem that must be solved for the production of thick chromized coatings is a prevention of the transformation of the iron from the alpha to the gamma phase at elevated temperatures. The effect of the phase of the iron on the diffusivity of chromium is substantial although no numerical data is available at the present time. However, Table I below covers the diffusivity of silicon in iron in the alpha and gamma phases respectively.

TABLE I Diffusion Composition Range of Phase Temp., Coefficient, Silicon, Wt. Percent of Iron C. Sq. em. per

SCC.

0-1 0 Gamn1a 1, 293 1.7 X 10-1 2 3-3.7 Alpha 1, 284 1.3 10-1 As can be seen at substantially identical temperatures of 1284 and 1293 C., the diffusion coefficients of silicon through iron in sq. centimeters per second, is 1.7 10-9 when the iron is in the gamma phase at 1.3 107 when the iron is in the alpha phase. Thus, it can be seen that the diffusivity of silicon through iron is almost times greater when the iron is in the alpha phase than when the iron is in the gamma phase. The effect of the phase of the iron on the diifusivity of chromium is of the same order and thus is of the utmost importance in obtaining a thick chromized layer on the surface of ferrous substrates.

The transformation of the iron from the alpha to the gamma phase can be prevented by the addition of certain alloying elements including aluminum, silicon, titanium, molybdenum, columbium (niobium), phosphorus, tantalum, vanadium, tungsten and zirconium. However, it has been found that aluminum, silicon and titanium are the most satisfactory alloying agents for this purpose since they have no deleterious effects on the ferrous substrate. The effects of these alloying agents in the prevention of the transformation from the alpha to the gamma phase are clearly shown in the accompanying drawings. Referring to FIG. 1, this phase diagram shows that the gamma phase does not exist at all in alloys containing more than approximately 2 atomic `percent of aluminum. FIG. 2 shows that the gamma phase does not exist in ironsilicon systems having more than 21/2 atomic percent of silicon. Similarly, FIG. 3 shows that the gamma phase does not exist in iron-titanium alloys having more than approximately 0.8 atomic percent of titanium. Thus, it is clear that the addition of very small amounts of these alloying elements completely prevents the existence of iron in the gamma phase which allows the diffusion of chromium into the ferrous substrate to take place at the high rate indicated in Table I above.

In order to produce chromized surfaces of substantial thickness on metal substrates by means of this invention, it is contemplated that both the prevention of the formation of chromium carbide and the transformation of iron from alpha to the gamma phase be achieved. There are many known substances that will react preferentially with carbon to form carbides, and it is contemplated that either the carbon will be removed by decarburization or that one or more of these substances will be added to the coating formulation. In addition to the above, it is contemplated that the coating formulation will contain one or more of the many known substances that will prevent the transformation of iron from the alpha to the gamma phase. However, it has been discovered that certain metals such as for example, aluminum, silicon and titanium will perform both functions in a satisfactory manner; and in such a case, only one additive will be included in the composition provided that this additive will accomplish both of the desired functions.

This invention will now be described further with reference to specific examples illustrating the process including specific examples of coating compositions which result in the provision of chromium alloy coatings of thickness up to 20 mils on ferrous substrates under the given conditions.

Example l The object to be coated is embedded in a mixture consisting of reactive and inert ingredients in an airtight, heat resistant reaction chamber. The ingredients consist of the following:

Percent Chromium powder 15 to 30 Silicon powder 1.5 to 9 Ammonium halides 2.5 to 10 Urea 0.5 to 5 Inert filler material 45 to 80 The ingredients are evenly mixed and charged into a heat resistant alloy chamber and the object to be coated is properly embedded in the mixture, care being taken to assure contact of the mixture with all surfaces to be coated. The reaction chamber is then sealed with sealing materials as described below, and the chamber is heated to initiate the reaction. As the chamber is heated past the temperature of 132.7 degrees centigrade, the urea melts and upon further heating vaporizes and decomposes to form nitrogen, hydrogen, and carbon monoxide according to the following equation:

The evolved gases expell the air from within the reaction chamber, and fill it with inert and reducing gases which effectively prevent any oxidation from taking place within the chamber. Excess gases can escape through the sealing materials as the latter become molten when the reaction chamber is heated to operating temperature.

The sealing material preferably comprises mixtures of chromium oxide, iron oxide, carbon and glass powders, adjusted to melt at a temperature between 1400 and 1600 degrees Fahrenheit, which is slightly lower than the reaction temperature maintained during this process. For this reason, the seal is molten during the reaction process, and therefore the evolved gases are held under pressure greater than atmospheric but the excess gas can escape during the coating process. However, when the coating process has been completed, the chamber is allowed to cool, the seal solidiiies preventing the entrance of oxygen during the cooling period, thereby preventing any oxidation from occurring at any time during the cycle.

As the reaction chamber is further heated the ammonium chloride decomposes to form chlorine, nitrogen, and hydrogen according to the following equations:

The chlorine, in gaseous form, then reacts with the chromium powder in the pack to form chromous chloride according to the following equation:

Similarly, the gaseous chlorine at elevated temperature reacts with the silicon metal in the pack to form silicon chloride according to the following equation:

As the heating continues to about 1750 to 2250 degrees Fahrenheit, the silicon and chromium chlorides which have been formed in the pack adjacent to the metallic surface of the object to be coated come in contact with the surface. Since these halogen compounds of chromium and silicon are unstable, they will be reduced upon contact with the hot surface of the object to be coated in an atmosphere containing hydrogen according to the following equations:

Thus, it may be seen that both metallic chromium and silicon are liberated at or adjacent to the surface of the object being coated. Since both chromium and silicon are soluble in and reactive with iron, these elements will diffuse into the ferrous substrate forming solid solutions, and intermetallic compounds depending upon the local temperature and concentration existing. As the silicon diffuses inwardly in the iron, it preferentially combines with the carbon which, at these temperatures, is diffusing outwardly, forming carbides which will not interfere with the inward diffusion of the chromium. At the same time, the presence of silicon at or near the surface raises the critical point A3 and therefore prevents the transformation of iron from the alpha to the gamma phase at or adjacent to the surface, further promoting the inward diffusion of chromium to form a thick case of chromium rich alloy at the surface of the substrate.

At the same time the above reactions are occurring, the

chlorine liberated by the thermal decomposition of the chromium chloride and the silicon chloride and ammonium chloride will tend to react with the iron according to the following equations:

The ferrous and ferric chlorides formed by the above reactions are gaseous at the existing temperatures, and tends to pass off with the hydrogen, nitrogen, and other gases formed during this reaction.

The above reaction can be continued until a chromium rich coating of approximately 20 mils of thickness has been deposited on the substrate. During this entire time, the glassy reaction chamber seal will be in the liquid phase, and the various gases formed by the above reactions, including nitrogen, hydrogen, chlorine, carbon monoxide and others, will be partially removed from the reaction scene by bubbling through the molten seal.

After this sufficient coating has been completed, the reaction chamber is allowed to cool. As soon as the temperature of the reaction chamber drops, the seal will solidify preventing the entrance of air or oxygen into the reaction chamber, thereby preventing oxidation of the reactants of the chamber at elevated temperatures. After the entire chamber has cooled to room temperature, the seal may be broken and the coated object removed from the pack. After the object has been cleaned by brushing, Sandblasting, or other suitable means, it will be found that it is completely covered with an adherent, coherent chromium rich case of high uniformity and integrity, which is greatly superior to any chromized case which has been heretofore obtained by previous methods.

Example Il The object to be coated is embedded in the reaction chamber in a mixture of the following composition:

The chamber is then heated to the temperature given above and as described in Example 1. This results in a chromium-silicon-iron alloy coating approximately 20 mils in thickness.

Example III The object to be coated is embedded in a mixture consisting of:

Percent Chromium powder 15 to 30 Titanium hydride powder 2 to 10 Iodine 1/2 to 6 Urea 1/2 to 5 Inert filler material 50 to 80 The procedure as given in Example I is followed: This results in a chromium-titanium-iron coating' of approximately 2O mils in thickness.

While the above examples have been-given n terms of the packing process, the formulae given above are equally useful when applied to the so-called vapor plating process. In this case, the same formulae would be used, with the omission of the inert filler material. The object to be coated is placed inside a closed heat-resistant reaction chamber, together with a quantity of the reactive material or the reactive material can be introduced into the reaction chamber from an outside generator and the chamber sealed as described above. As the temperature of the chamber is raised toward the reaction temperatures, the volatile components of the reaction mixture break down, forming insert gas, flushing out the air contained in the chamber as described above. As the temperature nears the reaction temperature, the chromium bearing compounds decompose and ll the reaction chamber with reactive vapor which decomposes on the surface of the object to be coated, building up the chromium alloy coating. In all other respects, the vapor plating process will be carried out in a manner identical to that described above.

The results of the coatings of this process produce chromium alloy coatings which are thicker, more uniform and in other ways more satisfactory than the coatings heretofore produced by the known methods. For example, Table II, reproduced below, shows the results of coatings of several samples of steel with pure chromium by the pure unalloyed chromium by the methods heretofore used, compared to samples of the same steels coated with chromium alloys as described by the above process.

TABLE II Coating Thickness in Mils Substrates Chromium Chromium- Chromium Chromium- Aluminum Silicon Titanium AISI 1020 0. 22.0 12.0 18.0 3.0 10.0 4.0 9.0 2.0 (i. 0 3.5 5.0 AISI 430 2.0 25.0 30.0 15.0

8 ferred form of mechanism of this invention it will be apparent that various modifications and changes may be made therein, particularly in the form and relation of parts, without departing from the spirit of this invention as set forth in the appended claims.

We claim:

1. The process of coating a ferrous metal object comprising the steps of heating said object in a reducing atmosphere in contact with a volatile compound of chromium and a volatile reactive compound of titanium, said volatile reactive compound of titanium being present in a quantity suiiicient to combine with the carbon in the surface layer of said object and to leave an excess of at least 2.0%.

2. The process of coating a ferrous metal object comprising, in combination, the method steps of embedding said object in a mixture of metallic chromium, metallic titanium, said titanium being present in a quantity sucient to combine with the carbon in the surface layer of said object and to leave an excess of at least 2.0%, a volatile halide and au inert iller in a closed reaction chamber, sealing said chamber and heating the same to a temperature of from between 1700 to 2300 degrees Fahrenheit.

References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,255,482 Daeves et al Sept. 9, 1941 2,399,848 Becker et al. May 7, 1946 2,791,517 Becker et al May 7, 1957 2,811,466 Samuel Oct. 29, 1957 2,816,048 Galmiche Dec. 10, 1957 2,851,375 Samuel Sept. 9, 1958 2,875,090 Galmiche Feb. 24, 1959 FOREIGN PATENTS 572,796 Great Britain Oct. 24, 1945

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2255482 *Mar 20, 1939Sep 9, 1941Fritz SteinbergProcess which consists in causing chromium to diffuse
US2399848 *Jun 6, 1940May 7, 1946Fritz SteinbergProcess for the introduction of chromium into steel articles
US2791517 *Nov 30, 1953May 7, 1957Deutsche Edelstahlwerke AgChromium-coating steel surfaces by the diffusion process
US2811466 *Mar 18, 1953Oct 29, 1957Metal Diffusions IncProcess of chromizing
US2816048 *Mar 19, 1956Dec 10, 1957Onera (Off Nat Aerospatiale)Process of forming superficial alloys of chromium on metal bodies
US2851375 *Dec 14, 1955Sep 9, 1958Metal Diffusions IncDuctile chromizing
US2875090 *Dec 20, 1954Feb 24, 1959Onera (Off Nat Aerospatiale)Methods of forming superficial diffusion alloys on metal pieces and especially refractory metal pieces
GB572796A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3257230 *Mar 24, 1964Jun 21, 1966Chromalloy American CorpDiffusion coating for metals
US3268306 *Mar 28, 1962Aug 23, 1966Trw IncTitanium pretreatment for protective coating of refractory alloys
US3317343 *Feb 1, 1963May 2, 1967Jefferys Richard AActivated coating of columbium metal
US3415676 *Aug 13, 1965Dec 10, 1968Sintobrator LtdAluminum cementation process
US3596346 *Apr 2, 1969Aug 3, 1971United Aircraft CorpMethod for joining metals
US3728149 *Aug 6, 1970Apr 17, 1973Bethlehem Steel CorpChromizing process
US3867184 *Jan 31, 1973Feb 18, 1975Alloy Surfaces Co IncCoating
US4308160 *Jun 23, 1977Dec 29, 1981Alloy Surfaces Company, Inc.Protecting metals
US4835010 *Jun 8, 1987May 30, 1989Exxon Research And Engineering CompanyAluminide dispersed ferrite diffusion coating on austenitic stainless steel substrates
US5648178 *Dec 28, 1994Jul 15, 1997Chevron Chemical CompanyReactor system steel portion
US6258256Jan 4, 1994Jul 10, 2001Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LpCracking processes
US6274113Jul 28, 1999Aug 14, 2001Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LpOperating steam reforming in steam reforming reactor system at a first steam to carbon ratio; providing protective layer to portion of steam reforming reactor system to reduce by-products; operating steam reforming
US6419986Jan 10, 1997Jul 16, 2002Chevron Phillips Chemical Company IpSupplying getter; removal; fixing
US6548030Sep 10, 2001Apr 15, 2003Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LpProtective coating on interior surface of chemical reactor
US6551660Apr 18, 2001Apr 22, 2003Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LpMethod for removing reactive metal from a reactor system
US6602483Jun 21, 2001Aug 5, 2003Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LpIncreasing production in hydrocarbon conversion processes
USRE29212 *Mar 1, 1976May 10, 1977Alloy Surfaces Company, Inc.Pack diffusion coating of metals
EP0072861A1 *Feb 23, 1982Mar 2, 1983Alloy Surfaces Co IncDiffusion coating and products.
EP0110581A1 *Nov 1, 1983Jun 13, 1984Material Sciences CorporationProcess and apparatus for surface alloying by diffusion steel material in coil form, and the products thereof
Classifications
U.S. Classification427/253, 428/668, 428/667, 428/938
International ClassificationC23C10/52
Cooperative ClassificationY10S428/938, C23C10/52
European ClassificationC23C10/52