|Publication number||US3140203 A|
|Publication date||Jul 7, 1964|
|Filing date||Apr 24, 1961|
|Priority date||Apr 24, 1961|
|Publication number||US 3140203 A, US 3140203A, US-A-3140203, US3140203 A, US3140203A|
|Inventors||Grunwald John J|
|Original Assignee||Macdermid Inc|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (12), Referenced by (16), Classifications (13)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
b United States Patent 3,140,203 METHOD OF AND COMPOSITION FOR TREATING ALUMINUM AND ALUMINUM ALLOYS John J. Grunwald, New Haven, Conn., assignor to Mac- Dermid, Incorporated, Waterbury, Conn., a corporation of Connecticut No Drawing. Filed Apr. 24, 1961, Ser. No. 104,816
6 Claims. (Cl. 1343) The present invention relates to the surface preparation of aluminum and aluminum alloys for subsequent metal finishing operations such as painting, anodizing, plating, bright dipping, welding, chromating, etc.
It is an important procedure in the aluminum finishing industry, prior to the finishing operations mentioned above, to remove the ever-present oxide film which forms on the surface of aluminum alloys on atmospheric exposure. A typical method employed in the past by which this is achieved is to immerse the previously degreased aluminum object in a suitable deoxidizing solution, which usually contains oxidizing agents such as chromic acid, chromates or dichromates, nitric acid or a mixture of these materials in well defined proportions. Their function is to replace this tenacious oxide film on the aluminum alloy by another film more suitable for subsequent treatments.
The use of chromic acid or any other chrome base deoxidizing solution in the finishing industry creates waste disposal difficulties since these formulations must be treated chemically before they can be disposed of safely. Also the use of chromic acid in certain finishing shops may cause contamination of rinsing waters, bright dips, anodizing and plating solutions. Furthermore, the use of nitric acid is always accompanied by obnoxious fumes which makes for uncomfortable and heatlh hazardous conditions as well as corrosive action in many plating installations.
Another procedure frequently used heretofore in the aluminum finishing industry as a preparatory step, prior to the finishing treatments, consists of etching the aluminum alloy in a suitable alkaline solution, thereby removing substantial amounts of surface metal. During this etching process, certain alloying elements of the aluminum, which are insoluble in the etching solution, will cover the surface in the form of a loose coating forming an unsatisfactory basis for further treatment, and care must therefore be taken to see that this loose coating is completely removed. This phenomenon is known in the industry as smut formation, and removal of the smut is also covered by the term deoxidizing as it is used in practice and in the present specification and appended claims.
It is therefore a primary object of this invention to provide a novel deoxidizing solution which is free of waste treatment difficulties and wherein the ingredients are readily controllable at the room operating temperature of the solution; also to provide a solution compatible with bright dip and anodizing solutions. It is a further object of the invention to eliminate adherent films on the articles undergoing treatment and the production of offensive fumes and insoluble residues in the bath, which disadvantages have inherently characterized prior aluminum deoxidizing-and desmutting operations. Among other ad- I vantages of the treatment herein disclosed is the fact that the bath components used are physiologically safe, which makes them well suited for treating aluminum objects to be used in the food industry. It is found that the deoxidizing action of the novel bath composition here disclosed is considerably faster than with existing chrome-type deoxidizers. Other features and advantages of the invention will be discussed as the description proceeds.
According to the present invention, a solution of a strong inorganic acid, and especially sulfuric acid, containing ammonium persulfate or persulfates of alkaline and alkaline earth metals, at concentrations of from one gram per liter to saturation, is employed and provides excellent deoxidizing properties at room temperature on all aluminum alloys except those with high silicon content.
5 However, high silicon alloys can be handled with this system by adding a fluoride anion.
In the acid solution, as described above, the persulfate reacts with the aluminum or its alloying elements and is reduced to sulfate. Thus, unlike other deoxidizing baths, the exhausted solution of this invention contains no objectionable ingredients and can be disposed of after neutralization as in the case of any other spent acid.
While I do not intend to be limited thereby, it is believed that the reaction involved in the desmutting process is as follows:
where M is one or several of the alloying elements contained in the aluminum smut, and herein assumed to yield divalent ions in solution. A similar reaction can be formulated with aluminum or other trivalent ions.
One of the significant advantages of this discovery lies in the ability to achieve both cleaning and deoxidizing of aluminum objects in a single operation by the further incorporation of a suitable wetting agent. Any of several well-known surface tension depressing ionic or nonionic materials may be used for this purpose. Thus,
it is found to be of great assistance in removing obnoxious oxide films from aluminum strip processed in continuous operation, wherein the aluminum strip is moved at high speed through a trough containing the deoxidizing solution and then through a rinsing trough. Large quantities of aluminum strip can be processed during short periods of time in such manner. Such treatments are impossible with chrome type deoxidizers which require very abundant rinsing that cannot be provided in a continuous operation.
Another advantage of this formulation is that it will not dimensionally alter or affect aluminum objects that are immersed, even for very prolonged periods of time. Furthermore, bright dipped objects immersed in this composition do not undergo dulling or loss of luster.
The following examples are given for illustration purposes but it will be understood that they do not define the limits of the invention which are set out in the claims.
Example No. 1
Aqueous solutions were prepared with the following concentrations and employed at the indicated conditions:
Aluminum objects, previously etched in high temperature alkaline baths until the formation of a heavy dark smut appears, were then immersed in the above solution for periods of 10 seconds to 2 minutes. A light and smut-free surface is obtained which forms an excellent base for further finishing operations such as anodizing, painting, bright dipping, dyeing, chromating, etc. Also, aluminum objects treated in the above solution show excellent protection against dulling on subsequent atmospheric exposure.
Example N0. 2
Aqueous solutions as in Example 1 were modified by replacing ammonium persulfate with potassium persulfate at concentrations from 1 gram per liter to satura- 7 tion. Aluminum alloys, previously etch-cleaned in commercial alkaline cleaning mixtures, were then dipped in the above solution for periods of 10 seconds to 3 minutes. The resulting surface forms a very satisfactory basis for further finishing operations.
Example No. 3
The following aqueous solution was prepared:
' Sodium bisulfate 50 grams per liter. Ammonium persulfate 30 grams per liter. Temperature 50 to 90 F. pH 2.0 max.
Aluminum objects previously cleaned in commercial cleaning solutions and then dipped in the above formulation are of excellent appearance and are well suited for further finishing treatments. The formulation given in Example No. 3 has the further advantage of eliminating handling of liquid acids during shipping and subsequent preparation for use, which always is somewhat hazardous in the case of liquid materials.
The solutions of the foregoing examples are suitable for use on aluminum and all alloys thereof except those containing silicon as a significant alloying element, in amounts for example of 1% or more. In such case the inclusion of a fluoride ion in the bath composition is necessary and the following is typical of satisfactory formulations for this purpose.
Example N0. 4
Aqueous solutions were prepared, as given in Examples 1-3 and to these was added from .1 to 20 grams per liter of ammonium bifluoride to provide the equivalent of from about 0.067 to 13.2 grams per liter of fluoride ion in solution. Aluminum objects containing silicon immersed in the above solutions at room temperature for periods of 20 seconds to 3 minutes formed highly satisfactory bases for further treatment such as phosphating, anodizing, bright dipping, painting, dyeing, spot welding, etc.
Although the above example uses ammonium bifluoride, other inorganic fluorides can be conveniently used.
Dry compositions comprising admixtures in proper proportion of soluble persulfate salts and the acid salts of strong inorganic acids may be prepared such that when these dry compositions are dissolved in an appropriate volume of water, a desmutting solution of the desired concentration is obtained. Such dry compositions have advantages over the liquid form, more especially from the safety standpoint because of better chemical stability and the consequent reduction of explosion hazards, elimination of handling of corrosive liquids, as well as in respect to simplifying shipment and storage as mentioned above in connection with the composition described in Example No. 3. For the dry composition, the soluble persulfate salts may be any of the alkali, alkaline earth and ammonium compounds; any of the soluble acid salts of sulfuric or other strong inorganic acid may be employed as the other component.
Each of the foregoing examples is directed to the use of sulfuric acid or the acid salt, since these are found in practice to be the most practical and economical to employ and are therefore definitely preferred. The system is operative with other strong acids; however, most of the others, with the possible exception of phosphoric acid, introduce problems of waste disposal, noxious fumes 'and/or greater cost. In all cases, however, it is critical that the acid employed create a solution pH equal to or less than 2.0.
The concentration of the persulfate in solution can vary rather widely as indicated in the examples and still be operative, although of course the concentration will affect the processing time. As mentioned above, concentrations as low as 1 gram per liter are useful and they may go as high as the limit of solubility of the compound in solution. In general, however, the best results for the ammonium, sodium and potassium persulfates both operationally and economically are obtained at concentrations of from around 20 to 50 grams per liter, with an optimum at around 30 grams per liter.
While the high solubility of the reaction products of the deoxidizing treatment makes rinsing a very simple matter, any of the foregoing baths may incorporate an acid-compatible surfactant, for example sodium lauryl sulfate, to facilitate run-off of adherent solution during transfer of the articles from the surface preparation treatment herein disclosed to a subsequent operation. This not only substantially reduces solution drag-out, and the inherent replenishment problem, but it materially reduces or eliminates contamination of subsequent treatment baths. As already mentioned, the formulations here disclosed permit of continuous strip metal processing which is not possible in the conventional chromic-nitric acid formulations. Where it is desired to combine cleaning with deoxidizing as above indicated, the solution temperature should be higher than that employed for deoxidizing purposes alone. In such cases, temperatures of from 70 to F. are recommended.
Processing time of course depends on the degree of oxidation of the metal surface and on the concentration of the active agents in solution. In the range of preferred concentrations mentioned, the solutions normally produce the desired deoxidizing action after immersion times of 20 seconds to 2 minutes. The upper limit however is not critical as the solutions will not dimensionally affect im mersed parts even on very prolonged exposure. The lower limit is at least 10 seconds.
What is claimed is:
l. A deoxidizing solution for aluminum alloys containing silicon as a significant alloying element, which consists essentially, in addition to water, of a soluble persulfate selected from the group consisting of persulfuric acid and the ammonium, alkali and alkaline earth metal salts thereof in amount of from 1.0 gram per liter to saturation, a soluble fluoride providing a fluoride ion concentration in solution equivalent to that obtained from 0.1 to 20.0 grams per liter of ammonium bifluoride, and a supplemental acid component selected from the group consisting of sulfuric and phosphoric acids, the acid salts thereof, and nitric acid, in amount suflicient to provide a solution pH not over 2.0.
2. The process of deoxidizing and desmutting aluminum and aluminum alloy articles which comprises providing an aqueous solution consisting essentially, in addition to water, of a soluble persulfate in amount sulficient to give a persulfate ion concentration equivalent to that provided by from 1.0 gram per liter to saturation of ammonium persulfate, and a supplemental acid component selected from the group consisting of sulfuric and phosphoric acids, the acid salts thereof, and nitric acid, in amount sufficient to provide a solution pH not in excess of 2.0, treating said articles by immersing them in said solution for a period of at least 10 seconds at a temperature of at least 50 F.
3. The process of deoxidizing and desmutting aluminum and aluminum alloy articles as defined in claim 2, wherein said persulfate is selected from the group consisting of persulfuric acid and the ammonium, alkali and alkaline earth salts thereof in amount of from 1.0 gram per liter to saturation.
4. The process of treating aluminum and aluminum alloy articles as defined in claim 3, wherein there is also present in solution a surface tensiondepressant wetting agent, and the temperature of the solution is maintained at from 70 to 160 F.
5. The process of treating aluminum and aluminum alloy articles as defined in claim 3, wherein there is also present in solution a soluble fluoride in concentration suflicient to provide from about 0.067 to 13.2 grams per liter of fluoride ion in solution.
6. The process of treating aluminum and aluminum alloy articles to provide an oxide-and-smut-free surface on the articles which comprises the steps of immersing References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS Parish Aug. 4, 1914 Walker et al Feb. 26, 1924 6 Oplinger Apr. 18, 1939 Wood Aug. 13, 1940 Burnside May 18, 1954 Helling et al. May 22, 1956 Newman Mar. 25, 1958 Thomas June 28, 1960 Kelly June 28, 1960 Saubestre May 2, 1961 Michaels Aug. 28, 1962 FOREIGN PATENTS Great Britain May 10, 1961
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US1106107 *||Jan 12, 1914||Aug 4, 1914||Chase Rolling Mill Co||Method of pickling brass.|
|US1484690 *||Feb 27, 1919||Feb 26, 1924||Bower John H||Material for and method of cleaning metal surfaces|
|US2154469 *||Dec 17, 1934||Apr 18, 1939||Du Pont||Bright dip|
|US2211400 *||Aug 10, 1938||Aug 13, 1940||Chase Brass & Copper Co||Pickling solution for copper-base alloys|
|US2678876 *||Dec 26, 1950||May 18, 1954||Rca Corp||Conditioning of metal surfaces|
|US2746849 *||Feb 18, 1953||May 22, 1956||Heinrich Neunzig||Method of imparting high brilliancy to articles made of aluminum and its alloys|
|US2828193 *||Aug 9, 1954||Mar 25, 1958||Turco Products Inc||Method for rejuvenation of aluminum treating solutions|
|US2942954 *||Oct 20, 1955||Jun 28, 1960||Gen Motors Corp||Non-hazardous etching solutions|
|US2942956 *||Oct 13, 1958||Jun 28, 1960||Wyandotte Chemicals Corp||Aluminum brightener compositions|
|US2982625 *||Mar 22, 1957||May 2, 1961||Sylvania Electric Prod||Etchant and method|
|US3051603 *||Jul 14, 1959||Aug 28, 1962||James Michaels||Descumming preparation and process|
|GB867573A *||Title not available|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3505179 *||May 25, 1966||Apr 7, 1970||Oberdorfer Foundries Inc||Method of producing permanent colored aluminum castings|
|US3954498 *||Oct 3, 1974||May 4, 1976||Motorola, Inc.||Aluminum foil cleaning process|
|US4212701 *||May 9, 1979||Jul 15, 1980||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||Process and composition of low toxicity for preparing aluminum surfaces for adhesive bonding|
|US4451304 *||Mar 21, 1983||May 29, 1984||Walter Batiuk||Method of improving the corrosion resistance of chemical conversion coated aluminum|
|US4883541 *||Jan 17, 1989||Nov 28, 1989||Martin Marietta Corporation||Nonchromate deoxidizer for aluminum alloys|
|US5052421 *||Jul 27, 1990||Oct 1, 1991||Henkel Corporation||Treatment of aluminum with non-chrome cleaner/deoxidizer system followed by conversion coating|
|US5286300 *||Aug 12, 1992||Feb 15, 1994||Man-Gill Chemical Company||Rinse aid and lubricant|
|US5720823 *||Dec 20, 1994||Feb 24, 1998||Henkel Corporation||Composition and process for desmutting and deoxidizing without smutting|
|US5855805 *||Jul 23, 1997||Jan 5, 1999||Fmc Corporation||Microetching and cleaning of printed wiring boards|
|US7077918 *||Jan 31, 2005||Jul 18, 2006||Unaxis Balzers Ltd.||Stripping apparatus and method for removal of coatings on metal surfaces|
|US9376733||Sep 24, 2013||Jun 28, 2016||Walter B. Freeman||Method of remediating aluminum smelter waste|
|US20060170757 *||Jan 28, 2005||Aug 3, 2006||Lexmark International, Inc.||Multiple speed modes for an electrophotographic device|
|USRE31198 *||Sep 23, 1980||Apr 5, 1983||Amchem Products, Inc.||Method for cleaning aluminum at low temperatures|
|USRE32661 *||Jul 27, 1984||May 3, 1988||Amchem Products, Inc.||Cleaning aluminum at low temperatures|
|DE2427601A1 *||Jun 7, 1974||Jan 16, 1975||Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd||Russfleckentfernungsmittel|
|WO1985001302A1 *||Sep 13, 1984||Mar 28, 1985||H.H. Robertson Company||Method for providing environmentally stable aluminum surfaces for painting and adhesive bonding, and product produced|
|U.S. Classification||134/3, 252/79.3, 134/28, 510/375, 216/104, 510/254, 510/269, 252/79.2, 134/41|
|International Classification||C23G1/12, C23G1/02|