|Publication number||US3157120 A|
|Publication date||Nov 17, 1964|
|Filing date||Jan 12, 1962|
|Priority date||Jan 12, 1962|
|Publication number||US 3157120 A, US 3157120A, US-A-3157120, US3157120 A, US3157120A|
|Inventors||Morgan William C, Rhoades Robert C, Stresau Richard H F|
|Original Assignee||Morgan William C, Rhoades Robert C, Stresau Richard H F|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (7), Referenced by (5), Classifications (8)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Nov. 17, 1964 w. c. MORGAN ETAL 3,157,120
soup DIELECTRIC EXPLODING BRIDGEWIRE SERIES SAFETY ELEMENT Filed Jan. 12, 1962 FIG. 3 38 INVENTORS WILLIAM C. MORGAN ROBERT C. RHOADES y RICH D .STRESAU ATTORNEY United States Patent Wis.
Filed Jan. 12, 1962, Ser. No. 16$,h23 1 Claim. (or. 102-28) This invention relates to a novel and improved exploding bridgewire unit and more particularly to a novel solid dielectric exploding bridgewire series safety unit.
As a safety feature in both exploding bridgewire and straight electrical resistance firing devices, it is highly desirable to include as a safety feature, some means to prevent the passage of electrical current at low voltages but at the same time not interfere with the passage of a proper higher voltage and current into the wire. Heretofore, various attempts have been made to solve this problem, and perhaps the commonest and the most successful to date is the system of placing a safety air gap in series with the firing circuit .developed for and used extensively with conventional blasting cap electrical firing circuits. There have been attempts to provide the exploding bridgewire with the safety feature of the series air gap but numerous objections to the use of an air gap were found when the rigid requirements for the exploding bridgewire were encountered. For example, in the conventional electrical blasting cap art, a relatively wide range of voltage and current was tolerable and a failure meant no more than that a new blasting cap was required. However, with the advent of the exploding bridgewire for many uses in the missile industry today, failures cannot be tolerated. High altitude temperatures vary over a wide range, extreme variations in atmospheric conditions such as humidity and barometric pressure are encountered and a safety element which is completely insensitive to all of these variables, is necessary.
In the conventional air dielectric series safety spark gap, it has been found that the breakdown of voltage is dependent over an intolerable range of atmospheric pressures. Likewise, the breakdown of voltage of the air dielectric series safety spark gap is equally sensitive to and variable with changes in humidity; again this particular gap is highly sensitive to the composition of particles in the air. A series safety spark gap variable with and sensitive to any or all of these conditions is intolerable for uses which vary from sea level to altitudes of 50,000 to 100,000 ft. or higher with a correspondingly variable barometric pressure. Also, it has been found that for the highly sensitive exploding bridgewire firing circuitry, that temperature changes so vary the distance between the electrodes in the spark gap as to make the firing circuitry either completely useless or even highly dangerous. Attempts have been made to overcome some of the objectionable features by encapsulating the spark gap in a hermetically sealed chamber or by gas filling a closed and sealed chamber. While such a step will overcome some of the objections, particularly as to humidity and barometric pressure these efforts have failed to solve the problem of temperature changes over the Wide range encountered. Also, attempts have been made to solve this problem by the inclusion of diodes in the firing circuit, but again, the problem is not adequately solved because it is found that the diode, when hit by the high voltages required for preliminary and safety testing, are completely destroyed and their functional operation as a diode ceases under these conditions.
Another disadvantage and objection to series safety air gaps heretofore utilized in bridge or conventional hot wire firings, has been the remote location of gap from the wire and stray currents, such as short wave radio and 3,l57,l2 Patented Nov. 17, l fid high frequency currents, have been known to cause the wire to fire because of the length of the conductor between the firing wire and the safety gap.
One object of this invention is to combine the solid dielectric or insulated gap so intimately with the bridgewire as to eliminate sensitivity to electro magnetic radia tion.
Another object of this invention is to provide a novel and improved series safety element in the exploding bridgewire assembly which overcomes objectionable characteristics and features of the gaseous or air dielectric series safety spark gap with a minimum of substitution of unfavorable characteristics therein.
Briefly described, this invention entails the ultilization of a solid matter as opposed to a gaseous dielectric interposed between two electrodes connected electrically in series with the exploding bridgewire and combined integrally with the exploding bridgewire itself.
Other advantages and objects of this invention will become apparent when taken in connection with the accompanying claims and drawings in which:
FIG. 1 shows a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of this invention;
FIG. 2 shows another embodiment of this invention illustrating the principle involved; and
FIG. 3 shows still another form of this invention.
Turning now to a detailed description of this invention. In FIG. 1, illustrating one form of this invention, the numerals 4 and 6 refer to lead posts of a conventional exploding bridgewire system. The numeral 1h designates a solid dielectric material located on lead post 4, and the numeral 8 designates a conventional exploding bridgewire Which'is electrically connected to lead post 6, as by means of welding, soldering or the like designated by the numeral 12 and which is ailixed to the dielectric insulating material it) at 14 as by glueing or the like. It is to be here noted that the bridgewire 8 is separated from the lead post 4. The amount of separation will vary according to the type of material 16 and the operating voltage selected for firing the bridgewire. As this forms no part of this invention and is deemed to be obvious to those skilled in the art, no specifics are here given.
In FIG. 2 wherein there is illustrated another manner in which the principle embodying this invention is applied, the numerals 24 and 26 refer to the conventional lead post similar to the lead posts 4 and 6 discussed in connection with FIG. 1. The numeral 23 designates an exploding bridgewire but which differs from the wire 8 is discussed in FIG. 1 in that this wire itself is insulated. The ends 30 of wire 28 are each looped around the lead post 24 and 2-6 as shown, and are affixed. to a non-conductive member (not shown) for the purpose of retaining the wires around the lead post 24. It is to be understood that if desired, the insulation can be removed from one end of the wire 28 and an electrical connection can be made to one of the posts, either 2% or 26 in the same manner the wire is connected to post 6 in FIG. I.
In the form shown embodying this invention in FIG. 3, the numerals 34 and 36 respectively, designate the lead posts comparable in all but one respect to the lead posts 4 and 6, and 2d and 26 of FIGS. 1 and 2. Surrounding each end of the lead posts similar to that shown in FIG. 2, is a bare exploding bridgewire designated by the numeral 38 which, in turn, is anchored to a nonconductive support member at 4% in the same manner as are the ends of the wire 28 anchored to an insulating support illustrated and explained in connection with PEG. 2. Dissimilar from the form shown in FIG. 2, the wire 33 is bare and the lead posts 34 and 36 are insulated by means of a suitable insulation designated by the numerals 42 and 44 respectively.
Turning now to an explanation of the operation and i) use of this invention, it is first pointed out that the solid dielectric can be of any number of dielectrics and in actual experimental tests, the silicone plastics, ceramics, the polyurethane plastics, the polyesters, the acrylic plastics, the polyvinyl, the polyethylene, the ethyl cellulose, the epoxys, including such plastics as polytetrafluoro ethylene (Teflon) have all been found to he satisfactory for this purpose. The thickness of the dielectric material, of course, varies with the dielectric strength of the material and must be varied accordingly. It will,
of course, also be varied in accordance with the amount of electrical energy desired to explode the bridgewire.
It is also pointed out that a certain amount of electrical energy is required to explode the bridgewire.
It is also pointed out that a certain amount of energy is required to break down the dielectric insulation and it must be realized that the currents utilized in breaking down the dielectric must be increased accordingly to offset the loss of the energy so used. For example, it was found that the bruceton 50% threshold voltage for a silicon base plastic coated platinum Wire of 2 mils in diameter and with the silicon insulation of approximately 0.2 to 0.4 mil thick was approximately 300 volts higher than an identical non-insulated platinum 2 mil wire. In each case, both wires were fired from a one microfarad capacitor. In each case, the energy from the one microfarad capacitor charged to 2,000 volts which provided a current with an amplitude of 800 ampheres with a rise time 0.8 of a microsecond or less was found to be sufficient to break down the silicon base plastic dielectric mentioned above and to explode the wire.
It will be apparent from the foregoing, that the solid dielectric insulation, when it breaks down, does not re turnto its original state as does a gaseous dielectric but is completely consumed or destroyed in the breakdown process. Also, should a higher voltage, but with a lower current of sufficiently specific characteristics so as to avoid firing the exploding bridgewire, hit the dielectric and while it may rupture or knock holes in the dielectric, it will not necessarily break down and destroy the dielectric. For example, it has been found that some dielectrics can be hit with 9,000 volts but with a .001 microfarad current, the dielectric will be puncturecl but will not be destroyed and in some cases there has been found to be a phenomenon of self curing of the dielectric takes place.
It is to be understood that various changes in wire, dielectric, etc., can be resorted to without departing from the spirit of this invention as set forth in the accompanying claim.
What is claimed is:
A solid dielectric exploding bridgewire series safety unit comprising:
(A) A pair of lead posts;
(B) An exploding bridgewire mounted upon and in close proximity to but'in spaced relation toat least one of said lead posts and being adapted to explode upon the passing of an electric current through said wire;
(C) A solid dielectric insulation substantially coating and surrounding said entire bridgewire, said insulation separating said exploding bridgewire from at least one of said lead posts, whereby a series safety gap between said lead post and said bridgewire is formed to stand off uncontrolled voltages from firing said bridgewire; and
(D) Said bridgewire being wound around at least one of said lead posts to support said bridgewire'thereon.
References Cited in the file'of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,736,398 Glossl Nov. 19, 1929 2,882,820 Young Apr. 21, 1959 2,996,944 Chessin et a1. Aug. 22, 1961 3,040,660 Johnston June 26, 1962 3,041,972 1 Ball July 3, 1962 3,100,447 Betts Aug. 13, 1963 FOREIGN PATENTS 1,036,138 Germany Aug. 7, 1958
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US1736398 *||Jul 24, 1928||Nov 19, 1929||Konrad Schaffler||Electric incandescent igniter|
|US2882820 *||Aug 11, 1954||Apr 21, 1959||American Cyanamid Co||Electric blasting initiator|
|US2996944 *||Jun 28, 1957||Aug 22, 1961||Hyman Chessin||Method of making a sparking detonator|
|US3040660 *||Nov 8, 1944||Jun 26, 1962||Lawrence H Johnston||Electric initiator with exploding bridge wire|
|US3041972 *||Dec 15, 1958||Jul 3, 1962||Atlas Chem Ind||Arc resistant electric initiator|
|US3100447 *||Aug 31, 1960||Aug 13, 1963||Betts Robert E||Igniter squib|
|DE1036138B *||Sep 14, 1955||Aug 7, 1958||Ludger Volpert||Funkenzuender|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3249800 *||Aug 2, 1963||May 3, 1966||Huber Henry J||Fast acting switch utilizing a vaporizable wire|
|US3797393 *||Jun 7, 1972||Mar 19, 1974||France Etat||Exploding wire fuse component|
|US5115743 *||Jun 12, 1990||May 26, 1992||Tzn Forschungs- Und Entwicklungszentrum Unterluss Gmbh||Propellant casing assembly for an electrothermic projectile firing device|
|US5736668 *||May 28, 1996||Apr 7, 1998||Trw Inc.||Inflator for an inflatable vehicle occupant protection device|
|DE1258771B *||Mar 9, 1965||Jan 11, 1968||Anstalt Fuer Montage Technik||Verfahren zum Zuenden von Treibladungen fuer pulverkraftbetriebene Bolzensetzwerkzeuge und Treibladung hierfuer|
|U.S. Classification||337/296, 313/350, 361/248, 102/202.7|
|International Classification||F42B3/18, F42B3/00|