Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3174580 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateMar 23, 1965
Filing dateApr 28, 1961
Priority dateApr 28, 1961
Publication numberUS 3174580 A, US 3174580A, US-A-3174580, US3174580 A, US3174580A
InventorsSchulz Carl G, Schulz Kurt W
Original AssigneeSchulz Carl G, Schulz Kurt W
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Acoustical tile construction
US 3174580 A
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

March 23, 1965 K. w. SCHULZ ETAL 3,174,580

YACOUSTICAL TILE consmucnon Filed April 28, 1961 l6 l6 INVENTORS Carl 6. Schulz United States Patent 3,174,580 ACOUSTICAL TILE CQNSTRUCTION Kurt W. Schulz, 908 Dawes Ave, and Carl G. Schulz, 1314 Oneida, both of Juliet, Ill. Filed Apr. 28, 1961, Ser. No. 106,270 2 Claims. ('Cl. 181-33) This invention relates generally to acoustical tile and more particularly to acoustical tile having one surface provided with a pattern of sound receiving recesses.

It is an object of the present invention to provide a novel acoustical tile which because of its construction has a higher noise reduction coetficient than that of conventional acoustical tile. More particularly, it is an object to provide an acoustical tile which not only absorbs and thereby dampens sound vibrations, but also effectively traps within it a portion of the vibrations which strike it.

An ancillary object is to provide such an acoustical tile which readily permits sound vibrations to enter its sound receiving recesses and then effectively prevents escape of the vibrations out of the recesses.

It is an additional object to provide an acoustical tile having a surface which due to its novel construction is both stronger and more atttractive than the facing of ordinary acoustical tile.

Yet another object is to provide a novel acoustical tile having the above characteristics which is inexpensive and economical to manufacture, easy to install and which may be readily and conveniently cleaned or painted.

Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the attached detailed description land upon reference to the drawings in which:

FIGURE 1 is a perspective view showing an illustrative acoustical tile incorporating the features of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is an enlarged fragmentary perspective view of a corner portion of the tile; and

FIG. 3 is an enlarged fragmentary cross-sectional view taken along the line 33 in FIG. 1.

While the invention will be described in connection with a preferred embodiment, it will be understood that we do not intend to limit the invention to that embodiment, but on the contrary, intend to cover alternatives, modifications and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Turning now to the drawings, there is shown an acoustical tile incorporating the features of the present invention. In the preferred embodiment, thetile 19 comprises a substantially flat, relatively thin facing sheet 11 and a thick, substantially rigid backing board 12. It will be understood that the backing board 12 is made of any suitable fibrous or composition material commonly employed in the fabrication of conventional acoustical tiles. The light-weight, porous nature of such materials has made them particularly well suited for acoustical enduses since their sound absorbing properties greatly exceed those of non-porous materials.

As shown (see especially FIG. 3), the backing board 12 has a rear surface 13 and a front surface or face 14. To lend sound absorbing efiiciency to the backing board 12 it is provided with a plurality of sound absorbing recesses or openings which extend from the face 14 substantially into but not entirely through the thickness of the board. In this instance the recesses 15 are substantially circular in cross-section and are each defined by a circumferential wall 16 terminated by a circular base 17. As is well know such recesses function to permit ready dispersion throughout the board of sound vibrations which strike its front surface.

3,174,580 Patented Mar. 23, 1955 ice Such a backing board 12 may be prepared, for example, by cutting a suitable insulating type fiber board to the desired size, eg 12" x 12" x /4", and drilling its front face 14 using a single or multiple spindle drill to provide the plunality of recesses 15 extending from the front face 14 of the tile toward its rear surface. An exemplary pattern of recesses in such a tile would be diameter holes drilled on /2" centers to form 22 rows of 22 holes each or 484 holes in each tile. Alternatively, an irregular pattern of holes of uniform or varying diameters may be employed if desired.

The facing sheet 11 is preferably formed of relatively thin metal, rigid plastic sheeting or the like, and is provided with a plurality of sound receiving openings or holes 18 which openings are of the same shape as and arranged in the same pattern as that chosen for the recesses 15 provided in the backing board 12.

As will be seen the facing sheet 11 is juxtaposed in relation to the backing board 12 such that the centers of the openings 18 register with the centers of the recesses 15. The sheet 11 and backing board 12 may be secured together in any suitable manner, for example by using a suitable adhesive. As shown the edges of the facing sheet 11 are flashed around the peripheral edges of the backing board. Preferably a marginal edge portion 20 of the facing sheet 11 is folded or crimped rearwardly around the edge of the backing board 12, the shape of the board edge and edge portion 20 being such as to define an apex 21 as viewed in section which forms a line of juncture between adjacent tiles when they are assembled together.

A peripheral groove 24 is preferably provided around the sides of the board and positioned rearwardly of the edge portion 20 for receiving the flange of an I-bar or T-bar (not shown) attached to the ceiling or wall to which the tile is to be secured, or for receiving a suitable spline (also not shown) which facilitates alignment of and strengthens adjacent tiles. In order to accom modate the web of such an I-bar or T-bar the rearmost portions 220, 23a of the cojoining sides 22, 23 are formed so as not to extend outwardly as far as the plane of the line of juncture between tiles defined by the apex 21. When the illustrative acoustical tiles are so installed the grooves 24 of adjacent tiles accommodate the flange of the beam passing between them with the web of the beam being received between the adjacent side portions 22a, 23a of the tiles.

The bevelled corner 26 of the backing board 12 peripherally surrounding the face 14 improves the interfit of adjacent tiles as well as their appearance. In this way the facing sheet 11 is made to conform intimately to the outer surface 14 of the backing board 12, thereby providing a neat and attractive acoustical tile.

The sound absorbing efficiency of acoustical tile, of course, varies depending on a number of factors including its thickness, porosity, and the depth, diameter and pattern of the recesses 15. The sound absorbing efiiciency of a given tile is evaluated by those skilled in this art by a standard test which determines the noise reduction coefiicient (NRC) of the material. This test consists of measuring the reverberation room sound absorption efficiency of the tile at a series of fixed sound frequencies, i.e. at 250, 500, 1,000 and 2,000 cycles per second. The arithmetic average of the reverberation room sound absorption coefficients at each frequency becomes the overall noise reduction coefficient. The average noise reduction coefficient of conventional acoustical tile often varies in the range of .40 to .60. It is understood that the higher NRC value designates the better sound insulator.

In accordance with the present invention, the sound absorbing efficiency of the acoustical tile is greatly improved as compared with conventional tiles by making the face sheet openings 18 smaller in diameter than the diameters of the recesses with which they register. Due to this construction the NRC of the instant acoustical tile is much higher than has been feasible in the past. As will be seen from the drawings, a portion of sound vibrations which strike the front face of the tile 10 will pass through the sound receiving openings 18 in the facing sheet 11 and enter the sound absorbing recesses 15 of the board 12. Upon so entering each of the board recesses 15, the sound vibrations strike the walls 16 and base 17 and become in substantial part absorbed by the porous mass of the backing board 12. The unabsorbed portion of the vibrations are reflected from. these respective surfaces but, importantly, the majority of these vibrations cannot escape from the recesses 15 due to the restriction caused by the smaller diameter of the facing sheet openings 18 in relation to that of the recesses. It will thus be appreciated that most of the initially unabsorbed portion of the entering sound vibrations are effectively trapped within the sound absorbing recesses 15 and prevented from escaping out through the openings 18. The so trapped sound vibrations are subsequently dispersed into and absorbed by the board proper thereby enhancing the noise reduction efficiency of the tile.

It has been found, moreover, that maximum sound absorbing efficiency results when the ratio of the recess (15) diameter to the face sheet opening (18) diameter is in the range of about 1.25 to about 3.33. In such instances the acoustical tile of the present invention is found to have an NRC of as high as 0.75 compared with the usual range of 0.40O.60 for ordinary acoustical tile. Table I below sets forth test results which illustrate the improved NRC obtained for acoustical tile constructed in accordance with the present invention, using different ratios of diameters of the recesses 15 to the openings 13.

The backing board 12 used in all of the instant test t-iles was a one inch thick commercially available product comp-rising a major proportion of expanded perlite, some vegetable fibers and a minor proportion of binder. The facing sheets 11 employed in all test tiles were formed of thin aluminum sheeting, and the recesses 15 and openings 18 in registry therewith in all test files were spaced on one half inch centers.

As will be observed from the data in Table l the 1.25 ratio of the two diameters results in an increased NRC over that obtained using a 1.00 ratio, and a ratio of 2.00 or greater provides an even higher NRC. Although no tests were conducted for ratios above 3.33 it is to be expected that such ratios would result in a further increase in NRC. As a practical matter, however, it will be appreciated that as the ratio of diameters is increased, either the openings 13 in the facing sheet 11 become unduly small, thus undesirably restricting the proportion of impinging sound vibrations entering them, or fewer recesses 15 may be provided per square unit of backing board 12. It therefore is desirable to maintain the ratio of recess (15) diameter to opening (18) diameter within approximately the above mentioned range, i.e. from about 1.25 to about 3.33.

For the purpose of increasing the sound trapping effect and also to improve the strength and appearance of the facing sheet 11, the portions of the facing sheet 11 marginal to the openings 18 are preferably formed with an internally extending circumferential lip 19 (see FIG. 3). It is understood that the lip 19 may be formed by any convenient method, such as by first drilling a plurality of holes in the sheet 11 and then pressing enlarged tapered punches through the holes to stretch and curve inwardly the peripheral stock. In this way each of the openings 18 is provided with a circumferentially tapered shoulder having a smoothly rounded contour which merges into the plane of the facing sheet 11. The lip 19 thereby in cooperation with the recess wall 16 forms a captive corner which increases the proportion of sound vibrations trapped within the recess 15. Such .trapped vibrations are of course eventually absorbed by the board 12. The rearwardly extending lip 19 serves, moreover, to strengthen the relatively thin facing sheet 11 by giving it a' corrugated-like or dimpled construct-ion. The rounded contours of the openings 18 also impart to the face of the tile a considerably enhanced appearance (see FIG. 1).

It is understood that where reference is made herein to the diameter of the openings 18, the diameter meant is the inside diameter at the rearmost end 19a of the lip 19 (see FIG. 3). Of course it may under some circumstances be preferable to form the facing sheet 11 as simply a punched or drilled flat sheet, i.e. Without provision of the circumferential lips 19 surrounding the sheet openings 18, in which case the diameter of the patterned openings will be uniform throughout the depth of the openings.

The acoustical tile of the present invention also incorporates many additional advantageous features. For example the instant tile construction obviates many disadvantages considered to be inherent in fiber or composition type acoustical boards. Such disadvantages include the tendency of fibre boards to readily absorb moisture when being cleaned or painted and their lack of fire resistance (thereby requiring use restrictions under many building codes). In addition the fibrous make-up of such tiles does not permit clean, well defiined recesses to be formed in them (particularly where twist drills are used for this operation), i.e. stray loose fibers frequently extend into the recesses from the surrounding board leaving the edges of the recesses frayed and increasing the tendency of paint to bridge over and entirely or partially clog the recesses. All of these disadvantages are overcome by the instant tile construction which provides an impervious facing 11 making possible ready cleaning or painting of the tile without absorption of liquid into the porous backing board, as well as providing well defined openings 13 which reduce the tendency of paint to bridge over and clog the board recesses 15. The metal or plastic facing 11 also increases the fire resistance of the tile and makes it available for more applications.

In the illustrated embodiment, the recesses 15 and openings 18 have been shown to be of various sizes and arranged in a random pattern across the face of the tile 11) (see FIG. 1), It is to be understood, of course, that other patterns, sizes and shapes of recesses and openings may be employed if desired. For example another arrangement falling within the scope of the present invention would be one in which the recesses and openings are uniformly sized and spaced.

We claim as our invention:

1. An acoustical tile for absorbing sound vibrations comprising, in combination, a substantially rigid backing member formed of a sound absorbing material of a relatively light weight porous nature, said backing member defining a pattern of spaced cylindrical recesses extending substantially into said backing member and terminated by a base port-ion formed internally of said backing member for dispersing sound vibrations within the backing member, a facing sheet having a series of openings distributed over its face in a pattern corresponding to that of said recesses, said facing sheet overlying and in contact with said backing member such that said openings are in registry with said recesses, and said facing sheet having portions thereof marginal to said openings smoothly rounded out of the plane of the facing sheet and into the recesses of the backing member to thereby form an inturned lip around each opening, each of said inturned lips having a smaller transverse dimension than said recesses cooperating therewith to form a captive corner behind said facing sheet to trap sound vibrations within said recesses.

2. An acoustical tile as defined in claim 1 wherein said openings are circular and said inturned lips are circumferentially disposed and the ratio of the diameters of said cylindrical recesses to the diameters of said openings References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS Howard 18133 Smith 181--33 Burgess 181-33 Lambert 15444.5 Hudson 154-445 Newport et a1. 181--33 Brisley et a1. 15444 Schulz 181--33 Great Britain.

at the innermost end of said lips is in the range of from 15 LEO SMILOW Elma? Exami'ler- C. F. KRAFFT, Examiner.

about 1.25 to about 3.33.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1937889 *Oct 6, 1931Dec 5, 1933Clark Howard ThomasSound absorbing material
US2014749 *Feb 1, 1933Sep 17, 1935Coast Insulating CompanyAcoustic tile
US2076807 *Dec 19, 1930Apr 13, 1937Burgess Lab Inc C FSound absorbing construction
US2165101 *Jan 6, 1938Jul 4, 1939Hudson George EAcoustic material
US2271871 *Feb 13, 1939Feb 3, 1942Newport Charles LSound absorbing unit
US2809492 *Dec 23, 1952Oct 15, 1957Simmonds Aerocessories IncApparatus for measuring and/or controlling fuel/air ratio of gas turbines without direct gravimetric fuel metering
US2984312 *Apr 24, 1959May 16, 1961Owens Corning Fiberglass CorpAcoustical wall board
US3074505 *Nov 3, 1959Jan 22, 1963Schulz Kurt WAcoustical tile or the like and its manufacture
GB776994A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3287874 *Aug 5, 1963Nov 29, 1966K S H Plastics IncChannel grid members with t-rail and hanger bracket
US3498405 *Dec 18, 1967Mar 3, 1970Le Panneau Magnetique L P M SaAcoustic panels
US3509671 *Dec 4, 1967May 5, 1970Conwed CorpLay-in type suspended ceiling and panel therefor
US3695395 *May 7, 1970Oct 3, 1972Armstrong Cork CoMetal-clad acoustical ceiling tile and its manufacture
US3819007 *Apr 27, 1973Jun 25, 1974Lockheed Aircraft CorpControllable laminar sound absorptive structure
US3887031 *Jun 11, 1973Jun 3, 1975Lockheed Aircraft CorpDual-range sound absorber
US5532440 *Dec 7, 1994Jul 2, 1996Nitto Boseki Co., Ltd.Light transmissive sound absorbing member
US5760349 *Apr 22, 1996Jun 2, 1998Dornier GmbhAcoustic absorber having a slotted horn arranged in a pot
US7819224 *Jan 20, 2005Oct 26, 2010Eads Deutschland GmbhAssembly for reducing noise in turbofan engines
US8381872 *May 5, 2009Feb 26, 20133M Innovative Properties CompanyAcoustic composite
US8708097 *Oct 21, 2010Apr 29, 2014Bellmax Acoustic Pty Ltd.Acoustic panel
US8714304 *Sep 21, 2012May 6, 2014Yoshiharu KitamuraSoundproofing plate and soundproofing device permitting air flow
US20110048850 *May 5, 2009Mar 3, 2011Alexander Jonathan HAcoustic composite
US20120240486 *Oct 21, 2010Sep 27, 2012Bellmax Acoustic Pty LtdAcoustic Panel
US20130270035 *Dec 21, 2011Oct 17, 2013Yoshiharu KitamuraSoundproofing plate which does not obstruct airflow
US20130306401 *Jan 19, 2012Nov 21, 2013Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KgSound absorber for a gas turbine exhaust cone, and method for the production thereof
EP0657870A2 *Dec 7, 1994Jun 14, 1995Nitto Boseki Co., Ltd.Light transmissive sound absorbing member
EP0738865A1 *Jan 30, 1996Oct 23, 1996Oerlikon-Contraves AGAcoustic protection on payload fairings of expendable launch vehicles
EP1342857A2 *Feb 26, 2003Sep 10, 2003Isopol S.r.l.Coating element with high sound-absorbing properties
WO2009047429A2 *Sep 12, 2008Apr 16, 2009Renault SaAbsorbing material
Classifications
U.S. Classification181/290, 52/145
International ClassificationE04B1/86, G10K11/172, E04B1/84, G10K11/00
Cooperative ClassificationE04B1/86, E04B2001/8485, E04B2001/8442, E04B2001/8433, E04B2001/8461, G10K11/172
European ClassificationG10K11/172, E04B1/86