Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3176303 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateMar 30, 1965
Filing dateFeb 21, 1962
Priority dateFeb 21, 1962
Publication numberUS 3176303 A, US 3176303A, US-A-3176303, US3176303 A, US3176303A
InventorsHerman Holland
Original AssigneeWhittaker Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Collapsible antenna with plurality of flexible reflector petals releasably retained
US 3176303 A
Abstract  available in
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

March 30, 1965 H. HOLLAND 3,176,303

COLLAPSIBLE ANTENNA WITH PLURALITY 0F FLEXIBLE REFLECTOR PETALS RELEASABLY RETAINED Filed Feb. 21, 1962 -2 Sheets-Sheet l Fl G. 2.

INVENTOR HERMAN HOLLAND M r 1965 H. HOLLAND 3,176,303

COLLAPSIBLE ANTENNA WITH PLURALITY OF FLEXIBLE REFLECTOR PETALS RELEASABLY RETAINED INVENTOR. H ERM AN HOLLAND United States Patent M ,COLLAPSELE ANTENNA WITH PLURALITY 0F This invention relates to a collapsible antenna and more particularly to an antenna which is maintained in a collapsed position, taking up a relatively small space, and, when needed, is rapidly expanded into operative position. I In present day space applications, a need exists to make everything which is to be carried aloft by a missile, such as the'components of a satellite, as lightweight and compact as possible. Any decrease in the weight of a device carried aloft will necessarily result in a corresponding increase in the payload capacity of the missile. The space within a satellite is also limited, and, accordingly, it is desirable to have all devices contained in the satellite in as compact a shape as possible.

Most satellites now include at least one antenna. An antenna generally has a radiator or collector and a reflector. The reflector is an element which ordinarily takes up more space than any other component of the antenna. It would be desirable to provide an antenna which has a reflector capable of being packaged in a Heretofore, no practical means has been provided to achieve this result.

This invention provides an antenna which employs a reflector consisting of a plurality of petals, each petal being made of a flexible material. Because of the resilient characteristic of the petals, the petals can be compacted to a relatively small area and maintained in this position by a retaining means. Release of the retaining means permits the petals to assume their respective original positions, thereby forming an operative reflector surface.

An object of the invention is to provide an antenna which is compact.

Another object of the invention is to provide an antenna having a reflector which can be collapsed into a compact position when not in use.

A further object of the invention is to provide an antenna which has a reflector capable of being collapsed when not in use, and, upon remote activation, can be expanded into an operative position.

A still further object of the invention is to provide a collapsible antenna which is simple in construction and 1 operation and at the same time, is reliable in operation.

Other objects and advantages will be apparent from the detailed description of the invention and from the appended drawings and claims.

In the drawings:

FIGURE 1 is a showing of the reflector in a collapsed, compact condition.

FIGURE 2 is a side view of the antenna in an expanded condition.

FIGURE 3 is a front view of the antenna in the full open position.

FIGURE 4 is a sectional view of the antenna substantially on the line of AA of FIGURE 3, illustrating a form of locking means employed for maintaining the petals of the reflector in place.

A general showing of the antenna in the collapsed position is shown in FIGURE 1. A mounting base 1 is provided to support the antenna structure generally shown at 2. A radiator 3 with its associated support 4 is attached to the mounting base by suitable means and exthe total space taken up by the antenna.

3,375,33 Patented MarQ30, 196 5 tends in a longitudinal direction from the mounting base 1. A plurality of petals 5 are attached to the mounting base by suitable means such as screws 6. The respective petals 5 are made from a flexible material capable of being distorted and returning to an original position after the distorting means is removed. Any fiberglass or other reinforced plastic materials could be used. A metal can also be used therein if it has a high modulus of elasticity. Fiberglass is especially good since it has an inherently low flexural modulus. Large deflections are possible with fiberglass materials without consequent permanent deformations occurring since the yield stress of fiberglass is close to its ultimate stress.

The respective petals 5 are bent over from their original poistion to form a cup-like structure around the collector means as shown in FIGURE 1, thereby decreasing The petals are restrained in this position by suitable retaining means. In this embodiment, a strap 7 is employed to retain the petals 5 in their flexed position. The strap 7 is held in place relative to the petals 5 by a plurality of clips 8 attached to the petals 5. The strap 7 itself is held in a locked position by a destructive link 9. Unless the link 9 is destroyed, the strap 7 serves to hold the petals 5 in their folded position.

The destructible link 9 can take any of a plurality of forms. A squib could be provided wherein, by utilizing a remotely controlled actuating apparatus (not shown), the link 9 can be destroyed, whereby the flexed petals 5 spring out to their normal position and form an operative reflector surface.

A remotely actuated solenoid could also serve as the actuating means to release the latching means (not shown) linking the respective ends of the strap 7 together. In fact, any type of well-known triggering mechanisms could be used to release the strap '7.

The surface area of the collapsed reflector, shown in FIGURE 1, necessarily is less than the surface area of the reflector in its open position. The decrease in size of the reflector surface upon collapse is made possible by having the petals 5 overlap each other as is clearly shown in FIGURE 1. The degree of overlap is necessarily proportionate to the decrease in the reflector surface area.

Release of the strap retainer 7 upon activation of the destructible link 9 results in the petals 5 snapping out into their operative position. An important feature of the invention resides in the fact that the energy for expanding the collapsed reflector structure is inherently contained in the reflector structure itself. The energy is stored up in the flexed petals 5 and this energy alone is used to expand the reflector structure. The open operative reflector surface can be parabolic, spherical, flat, or any other design, the operative form depending solely on how the respective petals 5 had been originally molded or preformed.

Locking means 10 are provided near the edge of each petal to maintain the individual petals 5 in a desired relationship. One type of locking means 10 which could be employed is a complementary pair of permanent magnets, as is clearly shown in FIGURE 4. A brace 11 is attached to a first edge of each petal 5 on its backside and includes an extension 12 which protrudes over the edge of the petal 5. The extension 12 is formed in such a manner so as to provide a recessed area 13 to support a magnet. A first magnet 14 having a recess 15 therein is inserted in the recessed area 13 of the extension 12 and attached thereto with a suitable adhesive. The opposite edge of each petal has a second magnet 16 attached thereto by suitable adhesive means. The second magnet 16 has a convex form which is capable of fitting snugly into the recess- '15 of the' adjoining first magnet 14. The-magnets'14a1'1'd 16 are'aligned so as to match upwith each atnerwnenthereflectbfis in its fully opened position. The attractive force between the respective pairs of magnets 14. and .16 serves toprevent separationf of-theindividual petals ".5 and helpsfto n'i'aintain he-prewarmined surface contour "of'flthe" reflectofriand provide .rim

' stiffness ties.

Other and ditferenflocking'rheans,-?stich as'conipleme'ntary latching means could be used .vvithout departing from the scope'of the invention.

The petal folding operation automatically stores energy in the form of material'flexural stress. ltis'thisflexural j stress energy which 'isjutilized" to ac'c'o'mplish'the im- "flding action. v f' the necessity'bf including withflthe antennava'ric'm's mechaanisms; control" devices; or ether extraneousf liar'dv'vare to effectthe expansion'of'the reflector. The onl 'power necessary to expand the reflectoris'thatffenergynecesfsary to trigger the release, ofthe' link 9'holdingf'the ends of the"strap"7 together. Since'no extraneous structure "is necessary to jprovide' the-.mo tive'po wer for expanding the reflector, a: significant decrease in the overallflweight offthe 'antenna structu're results. The absence" of "com- 'plica'ted mechanisms r'esults'in'an increase in reliability" of thecantennag I Because fiberglass plastic el ectro -magnetic radiations, a metallic surfacefmust'be *pro'vidediif"thepetals"5. are made of fiberglass." This can be achieved by vapor'depositing, metal spraying, or. metalbonding gold; silver, copper orlalumi'nu'mdo the fiberglass petals '5, Of course, this would not be neces- Ifsary ifthe. petals'5 themselvesare constructed ,from'a flexible metal.

I Alth'ongh this inventionfhas been disclosed and 'illus- This energy"s"torage' capability [obviates materials' do f'not {reflect I trated with reference to particular,applications, the principlesjnvolved are susceptible ;of numerous, other applications which will be 'apparent'to persons skilled in the art. The invention is, therefore, to be limited only asindicated by the scope of the appended claims.

lIA collapsible "reflector assembly essentially compris- '-ing a basearnernber; a plurality-ofindependent petals at- 4 tached to said base member and extending radially-there- "10 from, each of said petals bein'g'com'posed of a flexible solid material, sa'idi petals in "anunflex'ed 'state being capable of p'resenting aunitary'feflector surface, releas-v able retainer means for holding said petals in a flexed, overlapping position, meansfor deactivating said retainer Jrnea'ns, 'whereby the energy" utilized to expand said reflector assembly issupplied-solely by the petals.

.2. The reflector assembly-set forth in claim 12 including clockingm'eans'for rnaintaining thexpetals-in an aligned position .whilein anunflexed' state. i I 3. The reflector 'assembly'set fo'rth1in claim 2= wherein J said locking means are: permanent magnets.

4. The'reflector'assem'bly set forth in" claim 1 wherein I. said relea's'abler'etainer 'meansare remotely activated.

. i iliefer'encesQGited by the Examiner '35 HERMANKARLSAALBACH, Primary Examiner.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1683270 *Aug 25, 1923Sep 4, 1928Bellamy Taylor JohnRadiation receiving conductor
US2572430 *May 17, 1946Oct 23, 1951Breeze CorpAntenna structure
US2763002 *Jun 30, 1951Sep 11, 1956Bendix Aviat CorpCollapsible antenna
US2806134 *Jul 8, 1952Sep 10, 1957Adnan TarciciCollapsible reflectors
US3064534 *Apr 13, 1960Nov 20, 1962United Aircraft CorpReflector for space vehicle
US3109608 *Dec 21, 1960Nov 5, 1963Josef BoehmVision skirt
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3286259 *Apr 30, 1964Nov 15, 1966Goodyear Aerospace CorpUnfurlable reflector
US3456999 *Oct 24, 1966Jul 22, 1969Gerhard HoppPeriscope
US3496941 *Nov 14, 1966Feb 24, 1970David Clough KetnerSun-bathers reflector device
US3540048 *Oct 19, 1966Nov 10, 1970NasaDeep space-monitor communication satellite system
US4350412 *Apr 7, 1980Sep 21, 1982Georgia Tech Research InstituteFresnel spiral reflector and method for making same
US4862190 *May 15, 1987Aug 29, 1989Trw Inc.Deployable offset dish structure
US5198832 *Dec 13, 1991Mar 30, 1993Comtech Antenna Systems, Inc.Foldable reflector
US6175341Apr 2, 1999Jan 16, 2001Aerospatiale Societe Nationale IndustrielleElastically deformable antenna reflector for a spacecraft
US6625288 *Mar 31, 2000Sep 23, 2003Intel CorporationCollapsing paraboloid dish and method
US6930654Jul 31, 2003Aug 16, 2005Astrium GmbhDeployable antenna reflector
US7557995Jul 11, 2006Jul 7, 2009Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc.Deployable telescope shade
US8723752 *Jun 14, 2010May 13, 2014Gregory L. StrydeskySegmented antenna reflector
US20100315306 *Jun 14, 2010Dec 16, 2010Strydesky Gregory LSegmented antenna reflector
EP0091343A1 *Mar 23, 1983Oct 12, 1983Thomson-CsfInverse Cassegrain antenna for a multifunction radar
EP0286716A2 *Sep 10, 1987Oct 19, 1988CONTRAVES ITALIANA S.p.A.An antenna system for exoatmospheric missiles
EP0534110A1 *Aug 10, 1992Mar 31, 1993Hughes Aircraft CompanySimplified spacecraft antenna reflector for stowage in confined envelopes
EP1386838A1 *Jul 31, 2002Feb 4, 2004Astrium GmbHDeployable antenna reflector
Classifications
U.S. Classification343/915, 343/881, 359/851
International ClassificationH01Q15/16, H01Q15/14
Cooperative ClassificationH01Q15/161
European ClassificationH01Q15/16B