Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3194201 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJul 13, 1965
Filing dateFeb 13, 1961
Priority dateFeb 13, 1961
Publication numberUS 3194201 A, US 3194201A, US-A-3194201, US3194201 A, US3194201A
InventorsLang Thomas G
Original AssigneeLang Thomas G
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Underwater missile
US 3194201 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

July 13, 1965 T. G. LANG UNDERWATER MISSILE Filed Feb. 13, 1961 IOFOE ATTORNEY United States Patent() Navy Filed Feb. 13, 1961, Ser. No. 89,075 2 Claims. (Cl. 114-20) (Granted under Title 3S, U.S. Code (1952), sec. 266) The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the United States of America for governmental purposes Without the payment of any royalties thereon or therefor.

This invention relates to underwater vehicles, such as torpedoes, and more particularly to improvements in method and apparatus for propelling same.

The ultimate in torpedo design is conceivably a vehicle which is substantially all payload explosive with a propulsion and guidance system of substantially no weight or volume which would carry the payload at any desired speed to any desired range. The obvious impracticability of such vehicle has dictated a judicious compromise between its competing components and the art has been so highly developed that designers of various components are almost invariably restricted to remain within their spacial and weight allotments without encroachment upon those of the others. The problem is further complicated in thatlcertain components may be considered as fixed and others as variable. Thus, if it is desired to deliver a predetermined weight of explosive to a target, the explosive, guidance system, parts of the shell, certain structure and portions of the propulsive elements represent volume and weight which is unaffected by range or speed. Variable components are those the volume of which is proportional to propulsive power such as the energy source, the major portion of the power plant and certain other parts of the shell and structure. For a long range high speed torpedo size reduction becomes cumulative. Thus, if the drag could be `decreased by a factor of 2 the displacement of engine and fuel could be reduced about 50%. This reduction, however, would in some cases effect a reduction of about 40% Vin the wetted surface area permitting a further reduction in the power plant by another factor of nearly 1.5. The resulting reduction in horsepower would thus be a factor of the order of 3 which, aswill be apparent, would radically modify present torpedo design. For example, electric propulsion could probably be employed for higher speeds and greater range than heretofore possible.

Analysis has revealed that at high speed with fully turbulent flow, changes in torpedo hull or fin shape cannot effect significant reduction in drag. Since substantially all of the torpedo power is utilized in overcoming drag and since efficiency and performance of power plants has reached a near optimum state of development within allotted space it becomes apparent that if further significant improvements are to be made, radical and unconventional approaches will be required to materially reduce the drag of otherwise hydrodynamically well designed torpedoes.

The principal object of this invention is to provide a novel torpedo which significantly reduces drag as comdescription to follow, the appended claims and the accompanying drawing, in which:

FIG. l is a side elevation of a torpedo embodying the subject of the invention;

FIG. 2 is an enlarged section taken on line 2 2, FIG. l, intermediate portions being omitted;

FIG. 2A is a hull section illustrating an undesired flow condition, FIG. 2B is a like hull section illustrating correction of the lundesired flow condition;

FIG. 3 is a section taken on line 3 3, FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is a partial side elevation, similar to FIG. 1; of an alternative form of the invention; and

FIG. 5 is a cross section of an outer hull which may be employed in any of the previous figures.

Referring to the drawing, the subject of the invention comprises a torpedo hull 10 of any desired configuration, exemplary of which, as shown in FIG. 1, is a substantially elliptical hull, the major axis of which is approximately eight times the minor axis with the tail portion 11 modied to approximate a cone. As best shown in FIGS. '2 and 3 the hull comprises an inner imperforate portion 12 of any conventional design which may withstand the pressure at a desired depth of submergence and an outer portion 14 spaced from pressure hull 12 through which Water may penetrate into annular space 16 disposed between the two portions. As illustrated in FIGS. 1 to 3 outer hull portion 14 is provided with axially spaced circular slots 18, the portions between slots being supported by the pressure hull by spaced webs 20.

The construction shown in FIG. 4 is essentially the same as that of FIGS. l to 3 except that a plurality of spaced apertures 13A are provided in outer hull 14A in lieu of the slots which thus permit the outer hull to be formed from a single sheet of perforate material rather than a plurality of axially spaced annular portions.

FIG. 5 illustrates another form of outer hull 14B in which a porous material is employed for the outer hull through which water may penetrate. An exemplary material is fiber glass batting, the linters or fibers of which are coated with an extremely thin coating of thermoplastic resin, and then compressed under heat and pressure to bond the fibers where they cross each other into a sheet of strong material but sufliciently porous to permit water to migrate through pores 18B between the fibers or linters. In view of the ease of molding such material to desired configurations it is particularly advantageous for economical mass production.

The water penetrable material which may be either foraminous with discrete spaced apertures or porous with no discrete apertures permits water from the boundary layer to enter into space 16 when a suction or pressure lower than ambient pressure is established within such space. To provide such suction a pump 22 is employed, exemplary of which is an axial flow pump of the propeller type comprising one or more propeller blades 24 and angularly spaced stators 26 which provide more efiicient conditions for water entry into the propeller blades, such pumps being well known in the art. In addition to effecting ow of boundary Water from the ambient layer into space 16, the propeller blades serve a second function of directing the water axially rearwardly in a jet, the reaction of which provides the thrust for 4the torpedo. Preferably, the water is accelerated through a restricting nozzle 2S to increase its dynamic head which, in general, provides increased thrust eliiciency.

The pressure drop across the outer hull should be sufficient to prevent outward ow of water at all speeds and angles of attack. If the internal pressure is to be constant at all points then the hull should preferably be so designed to have uniform pressure distribution on its outer surface. If uniform pressure distribution cannot be effected by a particular desired design then the internal pressure may be variable, by employing manifolding or compartmenting (not shown), to produce uniform pressure drop across the various portions of the hull with variable pressure distribution on the outer surface of the hull. A pressure drop of- 4 to 8 p.s.i. will, in general, be found adequate.

Some clogging of the penetrableV material may be eX- pected since sea water will normally contain particles which will not pass through the material. While it might appear that such clogging would reduce the rate of ow of water through the penetrable shell and thus adversely affect the performance characteristics of the torpedo such action will not occur since the tendency to increase suction head of the pump due to clogging distributes a greater portion of the applied pump power to creating increased suction head, thereby maintaining iiow rate constant. While this decreases the distribution of the power applied to the discharged Water, the decrease in propulsion performance is slight since a very substantial portion of the power is utilized for propulsion and only the minor remainder employed for suction.

Suction of water through a permeable hull tends to control the boundary layer to maintain its flow laminar; however, disturbances, such as caused by surface roughness or hull shape may offset such tendency. Thus in FIG. 2A, there may be laminar low 30 adjacent hull 14 along a portion of its length after which surface roughness may change it to a disturbed laminar flow as indicated by 32. Continued flow along the hull may cause further disturbance until it changes to turbulent ow 34. When this occurs, uniform suction through the hull adjacent the turbulent zone will not change the turbulent flow back to laminar flow. It has been found, however, that the disturbance in the laminar flow may be nullied if a high rate of inward tloW is effected at a localized zone and before turbulence occurs. Thus in FIG. 2B, one of the apertures 18 adjacent the beginning of disturbed laminar flow 32 is considerably enlarged in area, as indicated at 153C, so that the rate of flow 36A is considerably increased over the ow 36 through the smaller apertures` 18. This nulliiies the disturbance and the water again flows laminar until a further disturbance occurs further rearwardly of the hull. As will be apparent, a plurality of apertures 13C may be disposed in axially spaced relation along the hull.

Obviously many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in the light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that Within the scope of the appended claims the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.

What is claimed is:

1. A torpedo comprising;

(a) an elongated hull,

(b) the major portion of the length of said hull being of water penetrable material adapted to permit ow of water from the boundary layer through said hull into a space therewithin,

(c) a pump adapted to discharge a jet of water rearwardly from the torpedo, said jet providing the sole source of thrust for propelling same,

(d) said pump communicating with said space for providing suction to pro-duce said flow,

(e) a major portion of the power applied to the pump being utilized for propulsion of the torpedo and a minor portion for producing said suction,

(f) whereby as said material tends to clog with foreign matter, said pump tends to maintain said ow substantially constant without substantial decrease in the propulsion etect of said jet.

2. A torpedo comprising;

(a) an elongated hull having circumferential sets of apertures disposed in laxially spaced relation along a substantial portion of its length and extending therethrough and communicating with a space therewithin,

(b) certain of said sets of apertures being of greater cross-sectional area than other of said sets, whereby the rate of flow of water therethrough is greater than through the other of said sets,

(c) the sets of apertures having the greater cross sectional area being disposed at positions along the length of the torpedo at which the laminar flow tends to change to disturbed laminar flow, to thereby prevent turbulent flow and etect continued laminar tlow across rearwardly disposed apertures,

(d) means for maintaining a substantially uniform suction pressure within said space to thereby produce greater ow through the sets of apertures of greater cross section than through the other sets of apertures, and

(e) means for discharging the water entering said space through the rear end of the torpedo.

References Cited hy the Examiner UNTTED STATES PATENTS 2,147,550 2/39 Sabathe 114-20 2,382,593 8/45 Wires 114-20 2,742,247 4/56 Lachmann 244-130 2,969,759 1/61 Giles 114-20 3,066,893 12/62 Mercier 114-20 FOREIGN PATENTS 717,416 10/54 Great Britain. 272,707 3/ 30 Italy.

BENJAMN A. BORCHELT, Primary Examiner.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2147550 *Sep 4, 1936Feb 14, 1939Gaston Sabathe LouisProjectile
US2382593 *Aug 28, 1943Aug 14, 1945Joseph Wires FrankMarine torpedo
US2742247 *Oct 26, 1951Apr 17, 1956Handley Page LtdOuter surfaces for craft moving in one fluid
US2969759 *Sep 13, 1957Jan 31, 1961Gen ElectricHydrodynamic drag reduction in vehicles through boundary layer control
US3066893 *Jul 31, 1958Dec 4, 1962Mercier PierreStreamlined body propulsion system
GB717416A * Title not available
IT272707B * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3375488 *Nov 3, 1966Mar 26, 1968Bendix CorpUnderwater transducer configuration
US4360348 *Feb 20, 1981Nov 23, 1982The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The NavyUnderwater vehicle porting system
US4395965 *Dec 23, 1980Aug 2, 1983The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The NavyLow drag underwater vehicle utilizing boundary layer suction
US4992999 *Jul 28, 1966Feb 12, 1991The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The NavySubmarine drone for carrying a barrel stave-type transducer array
US5574246 *Apr 21, 1995Nov 12, 1996Alliedsignal Inc.Underwater vehicle with improved jet pump propulsion configuration
US6082670 *Jun 26, 1997Jul 4, 2000Electric Boat CorporationMethod and arrangement for fluidborne vehicle propulsion and drag reduction
US6217399 *Jan 25, 1999Apr 17, 2001Electric Boat CorporationPropulsion arrangement for axisymmetric fluid-borne vehicles
US7851733 *Jul 10, 2006Dec 14, 2010Raytheon CompanyMethods and apparatus for missile air inlet
US8033890May 17, 2006Oct 11, 2011Warner Jon ASelf-propelled hydrodynamic underwater toy
US8344304Dec 10, 2010Jan 1, 2013Raytheon CompanyMethods and apparatus for missile air inlet
U.S. Classification114/20.1
International ClassificationF42B19/12, F42B19/00
Cooperative ClassificationF42B19/125
European ClassificationF42B19/12B