|Publication number||US3198676 A|
|Publication date||Aug 3, 1965|
|Filing date||Sep 24, 1964|
|Priority date||Sep 24, 1964|
|Publication number||US 3198676 A, US 3198676A, US-A-3198676, US3198676 A, US3198676A|
|Inventors||Nock Jr Joseph A, Sprowls Donald O|
|Original Assignee||Aluminum Co Of America|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (41), Classifications (11)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent 3,198,676 TKERMAL TliEA'll /EENT 8F ALUMHIUM BASE ALLGY ARTEQLE Donald 6). Sprowls, Upper isurrcll Township, Westmoreland Intuit and Joseph A. Neck, J13, Natrona Heights, Pa, assignors to Aluminum Company of America, Pittsburgh, Pa, a corporation of Pennsyl- Vania No Drawing. Filed Sept. 24, 1964, Ser. No. 392107 8 Claims. (U1. 148-159) This application is a continuation-in-part of our application Serial No. 277,097, now abandoned, filed May 1, 1963, which was a continuation-in-part of application Serial No. 107,313, filed May 3, 1961, now abandoned.
This invention relates to the thermal treatment of articles composed of aluminum base alloys containing zinc, magnesium and copper as the principal added elements, and more particularly, a treatment of such articles which produces the combination of high resistance to stress corrosion cracking, resistance to tearing and high tensile properties, particularly in the short transverse direction of thick wrought sections. The expression short transverse direction applied to wrought products refers to the direction which is normal to the direction of metal working or flow and in the shorter dimension of a cross section taken in a plane normal to the direction of metal flow. The expression has no application to castings.
It is recognized in the aluminum base alloy field that alloys containing zinc, magnesium and copper in the proper proportion develop high strengths at room temperature when they have been worked and then subjected to a thermal treatment consisting of a solution heat treatment, quenching to a much lower temperature, usually room temperature, and finally precipitation or age hardening by reheating to a relatively low temperature for a period of time. Although the resistance to stress corrosion cracking of alloy products treated in the foregoing manner has been satisfactory for many applications, it has been found to be inadequate under severe conditions, especially in the short transverse direction of articles of relatively thick cross section. With the development of new products made from extrusions, forgings and th like and with more severe demands for performance under adverse conditions, prior thermal treatments have been found to be deficient in developing a high resistance to stress corrosion cracking even though the strength is at a desired level.
Another property which has become important in the utilization 'of high strength aluminum base alloys is that known as Qresistance to tearing. This is a measure of toughness, i.e., resistance to fracture or rapid propagation of cracks in articles under stress. This property can be measured for comparative purposes by a form of the Kahn tear test as described in The Welding Journal, published by the American Welding Society, volume 27, page 169-8 (1958). In this test an autographic load-deformation curve is obtained while a crack is initiated in and propagated across the test specimen. The area under the loaddeformat-ion curve is a measure of the energy required to initiate and propagate a crack, conveniently expressed as inch-pounds per square inch, and the energy values thus obtained indicate the relative performance of different alloys and the effect of different thermal treatments. Tests such as these have shown that the conventional thermal treatments of aluminum-zinc-magnesium-copper type of alloys have not produced as high a resistance to tearing as is desired for some applications and consequently there has been a demand for improvement in this property as well as providing adequate strength and a high resistance to stress corrosion cracking. In referring to a high resistance to tearing, this means that the unit propagation energy exceeds 50 inch-pounds per square inch.
It is an object of this invention to provide a combination of thermal treatments which are effective in developing not only a high resistance to stress corrosion cracking but also a high strength and improved resistance to tearing in articles of particular aluminum-zinc-ma'gnesiumcopper alloys, especially in articles having a relatively thick cross section. Another object is to provide a combination of solution and two-step precipitation treatments which produces a highly corrosion resistant condition, a high resistance to tearing and a high strength in articles made from particular aluminum base alloys containing zinc, magnesium, copper and one or more hardening elements as the essential added alloying components, and more particularly in articles which, before treatment, exhibit directional stress corrosion properties. Still another obj ct is to provide a sequence of' aging treatments of solution heat treated articles made of those aluminumzinc-magnesium-copper type alloys in which the amount of zinc exceeds the magnesium and copper contents, wherein the resistance to stress corrosion cracking is controlled to a large extent by the last aging treatment of the sequence and the minimum time at temperature is determined by the alloy composition and thickness of the article.
We have found that these objects and other advantages can be achieved by solution heat treating and aging in two steps articles made of aluminum base alloys consisting essentially of aluminum, 4.5 to 14% by weight of zinc, 1.5 to 3.8% by weight of magnesium, 0.75 to 2.5% by weight of copper, and at least one hardening element selected from the group composed of 0.05 to 0.4% chromium, 0.1 to 0.75% manganese, 0.05 to 0.3% zirconium, 0.05 to 0.3% vanadium, 0.05 to 0.3% molybdenum and 0.05 to 0.3% tungsten, the ratio of magnesium to zinc being 0.2 to 0.5 part of the former to 1 part of the latter. Although the combination of high strength, high resist-, ance to stress corrosion andtearing can be developed in both chill cast and wrought articles of these alloys, We have found that the sequence of aging treatments is especially effective in wrought articles having a relatively thick cross section and in the short transverse direction. We have discovered that the response of the articles to the aging treatments is closely connected with the proportion of alloying elements and the cross-sectional thickness of the article particularly as it affects the resistance to stress corrosion cracking. Even small difierences in composition of the alloys and thickness of section of the article affect the minimum time and temperature that will produce a high resistance to stress corrosion cracking. In referring to a high strength it is to be understood that this refers to tensile and yield strengths that usually exceed 60,000 and 50,000 p.s.i., respectively. Also, it is to be understood that the strength attained by our method does not represent the maximum that can be achieved under different aging conditions, but the strength is still adequate for the required structural purposes. This level of strength plus substantial freedom from stress corrosion cracking and a high resistance to tearing offers a combination of properties not heretofore obtained in the defined alloys,
Cur method consists of initially subjecting the alloy articles to a solution heat treatment which involves heating them to a temperature within the range of 750 to 1000 F., but below the temperature of incipient fusion, and holding them within that range for a length of time sufficient toobtain substantially complete solution .of the zinc, magnesium and copper components. Generally this can be accomplished within a period of .from 3 or 4 minutes up to 10 hours depending on the thickness of the article being treated and whether the surface of the article is directly exposed to the heating medium, thus, an article having a thickness of /2 inch can be treated in a shorter time in an air atmosphere than one which has a thickness of 2 inches and a sheet inch in thickness can be treated in less time than a plate /2 inch in thickness in the same heating medium. At the conclusion of the solution heat treatment the articles are rapidly cooled to substantially room temperature, as by quenching in water at temperatures below 160 F. Cooling in this manner serves to retain a substantial portion of the dissolved components in a state of solid solution. However, by employing hot water instead of cold water it is possible to minimize stresses induced by quenching.
The articles which have been so quenched are then subjected to a two-stage precipitation hardening treatment, the first stage of which consists of heating the articles to between 175 and 275 F., the minimum temperature that can be used for a particular alloy being dependent upon the zinc content thereof. Thus, for alloys containing less than 7.5% zinc, the minimum temperature should be 200 F., while for alloys containing more than 7.5 Zinc the minimum temperature is 175 F. Moreover, those alloys containing less than 7.5% zinc should be held within the specified temperature range for a period of 5 to 30 hours but in the case of the alloys containing more than 7.5% zinc the minimum holding time can be as short as 3 hours. At lower temperatures and for shorter periods of time the precipitation is insufficient to provide the proper metallurgical condition for the application of the succeeding precipitation hardening step. At higher temperatures and for longer periods of time precipitation is carried too far which adversely affects the precipitation produced in the second stage or step.
Following the first stage, the articles are heated to a higher temperature within the range of 315 to 380 F., the minimum length of time for holding at a given temperature to attain substantial fireedom from stress corrosion cracking being determined by the zinc and hardenor element content of the alloy and the thickness of the articles as defined below. The holding period should not be less than 2 hours nor more than 100 hours, it having been discovered that a slightly shorter as well as a much longer period also yield the desired results as compared to the shorter period stated in our preceding application. The minimum time and temperature limits essential to develop the desired freedom from stress corrosion cracking are expressed by the equation k T2s0) where t is the time in hours, T is the temperature in F. and k is a constant related to the zinc and hardening element content of the alloy and thickness of the article being aged. The values of k for different alloys and for different thicknesses of the article are set forth in the following tabulation. It should be noted that in alloys containing 7.511 to 14% zinc, chromium is regarded as a separate addition and is not included in the group of hardeners zirconium, tungsten, molybdenum and vanadium.
Where manganese and one or more of the other hardening elements are present and the k value for one is lowerthan the others, the lowest value should be employed in calculating the minimum temperature and time values. There are no k values for articles having thickness of less than inch which are made of alloys containing less than 7.5 zinc since the improvement in the resistance to stress corrosion cracking in the short transverse direction in articles having a thickness greater than /1. inch is of primary interest and the two stage age hardening treatment, as applied to articles of the commercial alloys containing less than 7.5 zinc, does not afford any worthwhile improvement over the conventional single stage treatment in respect to attaining a satisfactory strength and increasing the resistance to stress corrosion cracking. The response of the alloys to the two staging treatment changes as the zinc content exceeds 7.5% and hence this is used as a dividing line in selecting the proper treatment.
Although values can be calculated which extend to fractions of an hour, as a practical matter it is advisable to go beyond the minimum and use a full hours exposure or more thereby assuring substantial freedom from stress corrosion cracking.
The minimum time limits established by the equation that are essential to achieve freedom from stress corrosion cracking are based upon a large number of accelerated tests wherein the specimens were stressed to a value equal to 75% of their yield strength and exposed to alternate immersion in a 3 /2% NaCl solution according to established procedure for this test. Specimens that remained intact after 30 days of exposure were considered to be satisfactory. Likewise, if specimens of other alloys within our range survive such a test, the allow articles represented by the specimens would be considered to be substantially free from stress corrosion cracking. In our preferred practice the alloys containing less than 7.5 zinc are treated at 320 to 350 F. while those which contain more than 7.5% Zinc are preferably treated at 320 to 360 F. Also in our preferred practice the second stage temperature should be at least 75 F. above the tempera ture used in the first stage. Although it is usually convenient to go directly from the first to the second stage, the articles can be cooled to room temperature at the end of the first stage and reheated to the second stage temperature.
As mentioned above, shorter times and lower temperatures for the second stage lower the resistance to stress corrosion cracking. On the other hand the use of temperatures above the maximum stated limits and longer periods of time result in excessive reduction in tensile and yield strengths.
The quenched articles should not be cold worked before the precipitation hardening treatment other than whatever working may be required to straighten them and remove any warpage and does not involve a reduction in thickness of more than about 2%.
While we are not able to offer a precise explanation of what occurs during the second stage of aging, it nevertheless appears that the precipitation differs from that produced in the first stage of precipitation hardening and the second stage creates a condition that distinctly improves the resistance to stress corrosion cracking and tearing.
In referring to stress corrosion cracking it is to be understood that this refers to the failure of the alloy article under the combined action of stress and corrosion whether the stress is applied externally or is in the nature of a rg idual stress. It is to be distinguished from corrosion which occurs in the absence of stress and is manifested in a general attack of the metal surface or causes pits to develop.
The alloys which respond to our novel thermal treatment and develop a high resistance to stress corrosion cracking, a high strength and high resistance to tearing contain from 4.5 to 14% by weight of zinc, from 1.5 to 3.8% of magnesium, 0.75 to 2.5% by weight of copper, and at least one hardening element selected from the group composed of 0.05 to 0.4% chromium, 0.1 to 0.75%
manganese 0.05 to 0.3% zirconium, 0.05 to 0.3% vana dium, 0.05 to 0.3% molybdenum and 0.05 to 0.3% tungsten, as stated hereinabove. The magnesium in any case should be present within the proportions of 0.2 to 0.5 part to 1 part of zinc and to attain a maximum strength and resistance to stress corrosion cracking we have found that in alloys containing less than about zinc the ratio of magnesium to zinc should be 0.25 to 0.5 part of the former to 1 part of the latter. In alloys containing more than about 10% zinc the ratio should be 0.2 to 0.35 part of magnesium to 1 part of zinc. In addition to the foregoing relationship of magnesium to zinc, it is essential that the copper content of the alloy should not exceed the amount of magnesium. The composition limits and proportions between the alloying elements must be observed in order to secure the desired combination of prop erties yet provide an alloy that can be cast and worked.
The presence of hardening elements within the stated limits is also essential in the aluminum-zinc-magnesiumcopper alloys to assist in attaining the desired properties.
Although these elements are substantially insoluble in solid aluminum they nevertheless affect the response of the alloy to thermal treatment, especially the precipitation treatment, and tend to hasten precipitation as compared to the same alloy without such elements. In addition, these elements improve the resistance to stress corrosion cracking.
The alloys just described may also contain one or more of the group of grain refining elements consisting of 0.01 I
to 0.2% titanium, and 0.0005 to 0.002% boron. These elements serve to produce a fine grain size in the cast form of the alloy which is generally advantageous to the mechanical properties. In addition, to minimize oxidation of the molten alloy it may be helpful to add 0.001 to 0.005% beryllium.
Iron and silicon are always present as impurities. Up to 0.3% iron can be tolerated and the silicon content should not exceed 0.2% and thus avoid the formation of any substantial amount of the intermetallic compound MgZSi.
Our thermal treatment serves to provide a high strength and improve the resistance to stress corrosion and resistance to tearing and still attain a high strentgh of wrought products made of the above-stated alloys, the benefits of the treatment being controlled by the zinc content and thickness of section of the article being treated as stated above. The articles which are particularly benefited by the thermal treatment are those which have a relatively thick cross section such as often found in forgiugs, extrusions, pressings and rolled plate or shapes. A thickness of more than 4 inch is considered to be relatively thick. In all of these cases the articles possess definite directional properties as a result of the type of hot working employed. As a consequence the tensile properties are higher in the direction in which the article is worked, usually referred to as the longitudinal direction, than in the transverse direction, i.e. normal to the longitudinal direction. The difference is particularly evident in the short transverse direction. In addition, the resistance to stress corrosion cracking is also lowest in that direction. The combination of thermal treatments described above greatly improves the resistance to stress corrosion cracking in the short transverse direction and brings it close to that in the longitudinal direction, i.e. parallel to the working.
We have found that the thermal treatments described above are also beneficial to sheet products (less than A. inch in thickness) of alloys containing more than 7.5% zinc. Zinc contents of such a magnitude generally have an adverse elTect upon the resistance to stress corrosion cracking in sheet products that are precipitation hardened by a single step, often referred to as isothermal aging. This adverse effect of zinc appears to increase with the zinc content and hence although high strengths may be achieved, resistance to stress corrosion is reduced. By
means of our series of treatments both high strength and tively thick cross section our novel thermal treatment is also beneficial to improving the resistance to stress corrosion cracking of thick drastically chilled cast bodies made from the above-described alloys. Drastica'lly chilled cast bodies refers to ingots, either solid or hollow, which have been cast by the direct chill or similar casting procedures as distinguished from sand and permanent mold castings. To obtain the desired improvement it is usually necessary to employ a higher temperature or a longer time, or both for solution heat treatment, to produce the requisite solution of the soluble components than'in the case of the wrought articles. After the solution heat treatment and quench, the same two-stage precipitation hardening treatment should be used as employed with the wrought articles.
The improvement gained by the use of our novel process in respect to strength and resistance to stress corrosion cracking is illustrated in the following examples. The composition of the alloys employed in the tests is given in Table I below.
Table I.C0mp0sz'tion of alloys Alloy Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Zn Mg Cu Mn Cr Ti 5. 69 2. 53 1. 67 0. 00 0. 22 0. 05 5. 75 2. 58 1. 67 O. 50 0. 00 0. O4 6. 91 2. 72 1. 48 0. 10 0.27 0; 05 5. 92 2. 63 1. 62 0. 04 0. 17 0. 02 8. 25 2. 89 1. 39 0. 5 9.1 2. 16 1. 5 O. 5 10.1 3.0 2 O. 5 12. 5 3. 68 1.59 0. 5 12. 1 3. 09 1. 54 0. 5 11.9 3. 42 1. 52 0 0. 24 12 3. 5 1. 52 0 O. 26 Zr 11.9 3. 48 1. 5 0 0.02 0.24 Mo 10. 50 2. 95 1. 95 0.21 Zr Alloys A, B and C were melted, cast into ingotsand forged to bars having a cross section of Zinches by 4 inches by conventional practice. The bars of these alloys were solution heat treated at 870 F. for 6 hours and quenched in water at a temperature of F. Alloy D was cast in the form of an ingot for plate and sheet rolling rolled to 2 inch thick plate solution heat treated at 870 F. and quenched in a water spray in customary manner. Alloys E through L were melted, cast into ingots and extruded into rod inch in diameter in accordance with usual practices. Alloy M was also extruded into a sector shaped bar, each side of which was'about 2 inches in length. Samples cut from the rods and the bar for test purposes were heated to 870 F. and held for 2 hours and quenched in water at F.
The precipitation hardening treatments applied to the bars or rods of each of the alloys are given in Table II below.
Table Il.Precipitati0n hardening treatments First stage treatment Second stage treatment Alloy Temp., F. Hours Temp, F. Hours 7 Tensile test specimens were cut from the forged bars of Alloys A, B and C in the short transverse direction, that is, in the 2 inch dimension. Short transverse specimens were also cut from the Alloy D plate and Alloy M extrusion. The average tensile properties of these specimens are listed in Table III.
Table IIl. Tensile properties in short transverse These results clearly indicate that a high strength was obtained as compared to a typical short transverse tensile strength of 80,000 p.s.i. and a yield strength of 68,000 p.s.i. for Alloy A in the conventionally solution heat treated and precipitation hardened condition.
Tensile test specimens of standard size were cut from the extruded and heat treated rods in the longitudinal direction and the tensile properties determined. The average values for each of the alloys are given in Table IV below.
Table IV.Tensile properties of extruded rods Tensile Yield Percent Alloy strength, strength, elongation p.s.i. p.s.i.
The foregoing tensile properties compare favorably with the typical properties of extrusions of the commercial alloy having a nominal composition of 5.6% zinc, 2.5% magnesium, 1.6% copper, 0.3% chromium, and balance aluminum that have received solution heat treatment at 870 F. and have been'aged 24 hours at 250 F. The typical properties of such extrusions are: 90,000 p.s.i. tensile strength, 84,000 p.s.i. yield strength and 12% elongation. The presence of chromium, zirconium and molybdenum, respectively, in Alloys 1, K and L had about the same effect upon the tensile properties as manganese in Alloys H and I where the same sequence of precipitation treatments were employed.
Additional short transverse tensile test specimens of Alloys A, B and C were subjected to an accelerated stress corrosion test which consisted of applying a stress to the hours failed in 3 to 5 days in the same test.
specimens equal to of the yield strength and exposing them to an aqueous 3 /z% to NaCl solution by the alternate immersion method over a period of 84 days. Three specimens were used in each case. No failures occurred during the entire period. In comparison, test specimens of the same alloys solution heat treated at 870 F. and aged in one step by heating at 250 F. for 24 It is therefore evident that the two-step aging treatment produced substantial immunity to stress corrosion cracking in the short transverse direction.
Transverse specimens from the extruded rods, the sector-shaped bar and the rolled plate were subjected to the same stress corrosion test for a period of 30 days and all survived the test thus demonstrating a high resistance to stress corrosion cracking.
The examples of improved resistance to stress corrosion given above demonstrate the value of the two-stage precipitation treatment as compared to the conventional aging practice of heating at 250 F. for 24 hours. It is also important to observe the minimum conditions for the second stage treatment as defined by the equation stated hereinabove. This is illustrated in the treatment of transverse specimens cut from the inch thick wall of an extruded tube of an alloy having the nominal composition of 5.6% zinc, 2.5% magnesium, 1.6% copper, 0.3% chromium and balance aluminum. The extruded tube was solution heat treated at 870 F. and quenched in cold water. Sections were cut from the tube for precipitation hardening by two different practices. One group was heated 3 hours at 225 F. and then for 4 hours at 325 F. A second group was heated 7 hours at 225 F. and then 9 hours at 350 F. When subjected to the stress corrosion test described above the specimens from the first group failed in 6 to 8 days whereas those from the second group remained intact at the end of 84 days. In the first group the time at temperature was too short while in the second group the time at temperature exceeded the minimum.
The effect of our treatment upon the resistance to tearing is illustrated in the following examples wherein ingots of the different alloys containing more than 7.5% zinc were rolled to sheet 0.064 inch in thickness according to conventional practice. Specimens were cut from the sheet in both longitudinal (L) and transverse (T) directions to provide samples for the Kahn type of test. The samples were solution heat treated at 870 F. for a period of 30 minutes and quenched in water at 75 F. One set of samples (1) was precipitation hardened by heating them to 250 F. and holding for 24 hours, the
conventional type of treatment, While a second set (2) was given a two-step treatment consisting of heating to 225 F. and holding for 6 hours and then heating to 350 F. and holding for 8 hours. The sheet samples were tested and the unit crack propagation energy was calculated in terms of inch pounds per square inch. The composition of the alloys used for making the sheet and the unit propagation energy in both longitudinal and transverse directions are given in Table V below.
Table V.-All0y composztzon and reslstance to tearing Alloy composition, percent Direction Aging Unit prop.
treatment energy, inch- Zn Mg 0 u Zr Cr lbs/sq. in.
7.95 3.46 1. 52 0.22 L 1 0 7. 3. 46 1. 52 0.22 T 1 0 7 95 3. 46 1.52 0.22 L 2 295 7. 95 3. 46 1. 52 0. 22 T 2 110 9. 98 2. 98 1. 50 0.17 L 1 0 9. 98 2. 98 1. 50 0. 17 T 1 0 9. 98 2. 98 1. 50 0. 17 L 2 345 9. 08 2. 98 1. 50 0. 17 T 2 200 11.90 3. 46 1.52 0.21 L 1 0 11.90 3.46 1.52 0. 21 'I 1 0 11. 90 3. 46 1. 52 0. 21 L 2 11. 90 3. 46 1. 52 0. 21 T 2 75 It is apparent that the two-step precipitation hardening increased the resistance to tearing although the treatments were not equally effective in each case. The improvement is significant, however, and is particularly useful in the design and us of highly stressed structures. The presence of zirconium is not essential to gaining the improvement, its benefit being confined to improving the structure of the ingot from which the sheet was rolled.
The benefit of our novel process as applied to a drastically chilled cast body is illustrated in the following example. An alloy having the nominal composition of 5.6% zinc, 2.5% magnesium, 1.6% copper, 0.3% chromium and balance aluminum was cast by the direct chill procedure in the form of an ingot having a thickness of 4 inches. Test bars cut from the ingot were solution heat treated at 960 F. for 24 hours, quenched and aged in two steps, 6 hours at 225 F. and 8 hours at 350 F. The average tensile strength Was 74,100 p.s.i., the yield strength 66,200 and the elongation 4.5%. Bars subjected to the alternate immersion corrosion test referred to above and stressed an amount equal to 75% of the yield strength showed no failures over a period of 133 days.
Having thus described our invention and certain embodiments thereof, we claim:
1. The method of thermally treating articles composed of an alloy consisting essentially of aluminum, 4.5 to 14% zinc, 1.5 to 3.8% magnesium, 0.75 to 2.5% copper and at least one hardening element selected from the group composed of 0.05 to 0.4% chromium, 0.1 to 0.75% manganese, 0.05 to 0.3% zirconium, 0.05 to 0.3% vanadium, 0.05 to 0.3% molybdenum and 0.05 to 0.3% tungsten, wherein the proportion of magnesium to zinc is within the range of 0.2 to 0.5 part of magnesium to 1 part zinc and the copper content does not exceed that of magnesium, said treatment comprising heating said articles to a temperature between 750 and 1000 F., but below the temperature of incipient fusion, for a sufficient length of time to produce substantially complete solution of the soluble components,
quenching said articles to substantially room temperature,
precipitation hardening said quenched articles in two steps according to the following schedule:
first step: for alloys containing less than 7.5% zinc, heating the articles to 200 to 275 F. and holding for a period or" to 30 hours;
for alloys containing more than 7.5 zinc, heating the articles to 175 to 275 F. and holding for a period of 3 to 30 hours;
second step: heating the articles to 315 to 380 F. for a period of 2 to 100 hours, the minimum time and temperature relationship to achieve high' resistance to stress corrosion being expressed by the equation:
k s mo) Hardening elements present Percent Zn Thickness of K Section, inch value Mu Cr Zr, W Mo,
V and/or Cr cooling said articles to room temperature,
whereby the treated articles acquire a high strength, a high resistance to stress corrosion cracking and a high resistance to tearing.
2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the solution heat treatment is applied to wrought products over a period of 3 minutes up to 10 hours.
3. The method according to claim 1 wherein the second stage of precipitation hardening for articles of alloys containing less than 7.5% zinc consists of heating the articles to between 320 and 350 F. and for alloys containing more than 7.5% zinc, the articles are heated to between 320 and 360 F.
4-. The method according to claim 1 wherein the second stage of precipitation hardening consists of heating to a temperature at least F. above that of the temperature used in the first stage.
5. The method according to claim 1 wherein the alloy also contains at least one of the grain refining elements of the group composed of 0.01 to 0.2% titanium and 0.0005 to 0.002% boron.
6. The method according to claim 1 wherein the alloy also contains from 0.001 to 0.005% beryllium.
7. The method according to claim 1 wherein the article to be treated is in wrought form and possesses directional properties.
8. The method according to claim 1 wherein the article is in the form of a drastically chilled casting.
OTHER REFERENCES Precipitation From Solid Solution, by the A.S.M., Cleveland, Ohio, pages 179-181.
DAVID L. RECK, Primary Examiner.
UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No, 3,198,676 August 3, 1965 Donald 0. Sprowls et a1.
It is hereby certified that error appears in the above numbered patent requiring correction and that the said Letters Patent should read as corrected below.
Column 3, line 75, for "lower-" read lower column 4, line 3, for "thickness read thicknesses line 14, for "staging" read stage aging line 31, for allow" read alloy column 5, line 1, after "manganese insert a comma; column 9, line 5, for "us" read use column 10, line 54,
for "544,529" read 544,439
Signed and sealed this 15th day of February 1966 (SEAL) Attest:
ERNEST W. SWIDER EDWARD J. BRENNER Attesting Officer Commissioner of Patents
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|GB544329A *||Title not available|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3306787 *||Oct 29, 1963||Feb 28, 1967||Ver Deutsche Metallwerke Ag||Forged metal shapes, their production, and articles made therefrom|
|US3454435 *||Apr 18, 1966||Jul 8, 1969||North American Rockwell||Method of treating precipitation hardened alloys|
|US3544394 *||Apr 8, 1968||Dec 1, 1970||Aluminum Co Of America||Aluminum-copper-magnesium-zinc powder metallurgy alloys|
|US3620854 *||Feb 23, 1968||Nov 16, 1971||North American Rockwell||Aluminum casting alloy|
|US3637441 *||Mar 2, 1970||Jan 25, 1972||Aluminum Co Of America||Aluminum-copper-magnesium-zinc powder metallurgy alloys|
|US3706606 *||Apr 14, 1970||Dec 19, 1972||L Esercizio Dell Inst Sperimen||Thermomechanical treatment process for heat treatable aluminium alloys|
|US3791876 *||Oct 24, 1972||Feb 12, 1974||Aluminum Co Of America||Method of making high strength aluminum alloy forgings and product produced thereby|
|US3791880 *||Jun 30, 1972||Feb 12, 1974||Aluminum Co Of America||Tear resistant sheet and plate and method for producing|
|US3836405 *||Jul 20, 1972||Sep 17, 1974||Aluminum Co Of America||Aluminum alloy product and method of making|
|US3856584 *||Mar 13, 1973||Dec 24, 1974||Israel Aircraft Ind Ltd||Reducing the susceptibility of alloys, particularly aluminium alloys, to stress corrosion cracking|
|US3881966 *||Jun 14, 1973||May 6, 1975||Aluminum Co Of America||Method for making aluminum alloy product|
|US3993476 *||Feb 12, 1975||Nov 23, 1976||Hitachi, Ltd.||Aluminum alloy|
|US4063936 *||Aug 26, 1976||Dec 20, 1977||Alloy Trading Co., Ltd.||Aluminum alloy having high mechanical strength and elongation and resistant to stress corrosion crack|
|US4069072 *||Aug 2, 1976||Jan 17, 1978||Pechiney Ugine Kuhlmann||Aluminum alloy|
|US4214925 *||Oct 17, 1978||Jul 29, 1980||Kobe Steel, Limited||Method for fabricating brazed aluminum fin heat exchangers|
|US4431467 *||Aug 13, 1982||Feb 14, 1984||Aluminum Company Of America||Aging process for 7000 series aluminum base alloys|
|US4495001 *||Dec 3, 1982||Jan 22, 1985||Alcan International Limited||Production of age hardenable aluminum extruded sections|
|US4734967 *||Jun 2, 1986||Apr 5, 1988||Imperial Clevite Inc.||Method of heat treating bearing materials|
|US4747890 *||Sep 24, 1986||May 31, 1988||Societe Metallurgieque De Gerzat||Al-base alloy hollow bodies under pressure|
|US4832758 *||Aug 6, 1987||May 23, 1989||Aluminum Company Of America||Producing combined high strength and high corrosion resistance in Al-Zn-MG-CU alloys|
|US4861391 *||Dec 14, 1987||Aug 29, 1989||Aluminum Company Of America||Aluminum alloy two-step aging method and article|
|US4863528 *||Sep 21, 1987||Sep 5, 1989||Aluminum Company Of America||Aluminum alloy product having improved combinations of strength and corrosion resistance properties and method for producing the same|
|US5035754 *||Apr 4, 1990||Jul 30, 1991||Nkk Corporation||Heat treating method for high strength aluminum alloy|
|US5221377 *||May 17, 1991||Jun 22, 1993||Aluminum Company Of America||Aluminum alloy product having improved combinations of properties|
|US5496426 *||Jul 20, 1994||Mar 5, 1996||Aluminum Company Of America||Aluminum alloy product having good combinations of mechanical and corrosion resistance properties and formability and process for producing such product|
|US5643372 *||Aug 15, 1994||Jul 1, 1997||Pechiney Rhenalu||Process for the desensitisation to intercrystalline corrosion of 2000 and 6000 series Al alloys and corresponding products|
|US6869490||Oct 19, 2001||Mar 22, 2005||Pechiney Rolled Products, L.L.C.||High strength aluminum alloy|
|US7125459||Dec 21, 2004||Oct 24, 2006||Pechiney Rolled Products Llc||High strength aluminum alloy|
|US7560669 *||Dec 6, 2006||Jul 14, 2009||Tata Consulting Services Ltd.||Method of thermal treatment of components|
|US20050189048 *||Dec 21, 2004||Sep 1, 2005||Alex Cho||High strength aluminum alloy|
|US20070131672 *||Dec 6, 2006||Jun 14, 2007||Tata Consultancy Services Limited||Method of thermal treatment of components|
|US20080277036 *||May 11, 2007||Nov 13, 2008||Luxfer Group Limited||Method for manufacturing tanks|
|DE2264209A1 *||Dec 28, 1972||Jul 11, 1974||Aluminum Co Of America||Aluminium base alloy sheet or plate - which is resistant to tearing|
|DE3329221A1 *||Aug 12, 1983||Feb 23, 1984||Aluminum Co Of America||Verbessertes alterungsverfahren fuer legierungen auf aluminiumbasis der reihe 7000|
|EP0020505A1 *||Sep 24, 1979||Jan 7, 1981||Boeing Co||Method of producing aluminum alloys.|
|EP0030070A1 *||Sep 25, 1980||Jun 10, 1981||Sumitomo Light Metal Industries Limited||Method for producing aircraft stringer material|
|EP0233858A1 *||Feb 6, 1987||Aug 26, 1987||Austria Metall Aktiengesellschaft||Use of AlZnMgCu alloys for sporting devices under vibratory stress|
|EP0377779A1 *||Jun 27, 1989||Jul 18, 1990||Aluminum Company Of America||Aluminium alloy product having improved combinations of strength, toughness and corrosion resistance|
|EP0392844A1 *||Apr 11, 1990||Oct 17, 1990||Nkk Corporation||Treatment of aluminium alloy|
|EP1409759A1 *||Oct 19, 2001||Apr 21, 2004||Pechiney Rolled Products, LLC||High strenght aluminum alloy|
|EP2714954A4 *||May 21, 2012||Aug 19, 2015||Questek Innovations Llc||Aluminum alloys|
|U.S. Classification||148/502, 148/417, 148/701, 148/418, 148/549|
|International Classification||C22C21/10, C22F1/053|
|Cooperative Classification||C22F1/053, C22C21/10|
|European Classification||C22F1/053, C22C21/10|