|Publication number||US3235870 A|
|Publication date||Feb 15, 1966|
|Filing date||Mar 9, 1961|
|Priority date||Mar 9, 1961|
|Publication number||US 3235870 A, US 3235870A, US-A-3235870, US3235870 A, US3235870A|
|Inventors||Hannan Peter W|
|Original Assignee||Hazeltine Research Inc|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (5), Referenced by (18), Classifications (7)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Feb. 15, 1966 P. w. HANNAN DOUBLE-REFLECTOR ANTENNA WITH POLARIZATIONCHANGING SUBREFLECTOR Filed March 9, 1961 Hor. Polar. Energy Vert. Polar. Energy United States Patent 3,235,870 DOUBLE-REFLECTOR ANTENNA WITH POLAR- RAMON-CHANGING SUBREFLECTOR Peter W. Harman, Northport, N.Y., assignor to Hazeltine Research inc, a corporation of Illinois Fiied Mar. 9, 1961, Ser. No. 94,513 5 Claims. (Cl. 343-756) This invention relates to antennas having a feed cooperating with a subreflector which, in turn, cooperates with a main reflector, and more particularly to such antennas wherein the subreflector changes the polarization of an electromagnetic wave which it reflects.
In the design of an optical telescope, the Cassegrain double-reflector system has often been utilized. Compared with the single-reflector type, it achieves a high magnification with a short focal length, and allows a convenient rear location for the observer. Recently, a number of microwave antennas have been developed which employ double-reflector systems similar to that of the Cassegrain telescope.
A Cassegrain telescope consists of two mirrors and an observing optical instrument. The primary mirror, which is a large concave mirror in the rear, collects the incoming light and reflects it toward the secondary mirror, which is a small convex mirror out in front. The secondary mirror then reflects the light back through a hole in the center of the primary mirror. When the incoming rays of light are parallel to the telescope axis, the final bundle of light rays is focused toward a point; at this location the observer places his eye or his camera.
In the basic microwave antenna derived from the Cassegrain telescope, the microwave reflectors, which will be called the main reflector and the subreflector, have surfaces similar in shape to those of the telescope. The microwave feed is a small antenna which, together with a transmitter or receiver, replaces the optical instrument of the telescope.
Analysis of the operation of a Cassegrain antenna system may be performed with the same semi-optical approximation commonly employed with an ordinary single-reflector antenna. Usually the feed is sutficiently small so that the wave radiated by the feed can be described by the far-field pattern of the feed before reaching the subreflector, and the wave incident on the subreflector appears to travel along the rays originating from a point centered on the feed. The subreflector, which must be large enough to intercept the useful portion of the feed radiation, ordinarily reflects this wave essentially according to ray optics. On reaching the main reflector, the
wave is again reflected according to ray optics, and, be-
cause of the geometry of the antenna elements, the rays emerge parallel and the wave front has the flat shape which is usually desired. The amplitude of the emergent wave across the aperture has a taper which is determined by the radiation pattern of the feed, modified by the additional tapering effect of. the antenna geometry. The far-field pattern of the antenna is a diiiraction pattern whose characteristics depend on the amplitude taper of the emergent wave.
The geometry of the Cassegrain system is simple and well known. The classical Cassegrain geometry employs a parabolic contour for the main reflector and a hyperbolic contour for the subreflector. One of the two foci of the hyperbola is the real focal point of the system, and is located at the center of the feed; the other is a virtual focal point which is located at the focus of the parabola. As a result, all parts of a wave originating at the real focal point, and then reflected from both surfaces, travel equal distances to a plane in front of the antenna. The invention is also applicable to variations of the classical Cassegrain system, including variations which resemble classical Gregorian telescope. It is also applicable to other double-reflector systems having reflecting surfaces with contours quite different from those of the Cassegrain or Gregorian telescope-s.
There are several problems involved in the design of double-reflector microwave antennas. One problem is impedance mismatching of the feed caused by reflection of the transmitted wave back into the feed by the subreflector. Another concerns the radiation of a spurious wave by virtue of direct radiation from the feed. A third problem is blocking of the main aperture by the feed and subreflector.
It is an object of this invention, therefore, to provide double-reflector antennas which avoid one or more disadvantages of the prior art.
It is an additional object of this invention to provide double-reflector antennas with reduced undesirable reflections from the subreflector into the feed.
It is a further object of this invention to provide double-reflector antennas in which harmful eflects resulting from direct radiation by the feed are avoided.
It is a further object of this invention to provide double-reflector antennas with reduced aperture blocking.
It is a further object of this invention to provide eflicient double-reflector microwave antennas.
In accordance with the invention, a double-reflector antenna capable of receiving and transmitting signals of vertical polarization comprises a horn dimensioned to support waves of horizontal polarization only; polarization changing subreflector means for changing a horizontally polarized wave radiated by the horn to a vertically polarized wave and for reflecting the vertically polarized wave back toward the horn. The antenna also comprises a main reflector for redirecting the reflected wave back past the subreflector means, the antenna being so constructed and arranged that the horn is unaffected by the wave reflected by the subreflector means as a result of the change in polarization.
For a better understanding of the present invention, together with other and further objects thereof, reference is bad to the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawing, and its scope will be pointed out in the appended claims.
In the drawing:
FIG. 1 is a side view of a double-reflector antenna in accordance with the invention;
FIG. 2 includes two views of polarization-changing means utilized in the FIG. 1 antenna;
FIG. 3 illustrates another double-reflector antenna in accordance with the invention which utilizes a dipoletype feed, and
FIG. 4 illustrates an additional double-reflector antenna in accordance with the invention which utilizes a polarization-sensitive grating in the main reflector.
Referring now to FIG. 1 of the drawing, there is shown a double-reflector Cassegrain-type antenna having a feed in the form of horn 1t cooperating with subreflector means shown as including a simple metallic subreflector 11 and associated polarization-changing means 12., which, in turn, cooperates with a main reflector 13.
In operation, this antenna is capable of receiving and transmitting waves of a predetermined polarization, in this example shown to be a vertically polarized wave. Feed 10 has a polarization different from the polarization of the complete antenna; in this example the feed is designed for operation with horizontally polarized waves. Feed 10 acts as a primary antenna for efifecting the transition between a free-space electromagnetic wave and a guided electromagnetic wave and vice versa. Considering operation during transmission, the feed 10 radiates a horizontally polarized electromagnetic wave which is directed towards the subreflector means 11 and 12. The polarization-changing means 12 coupled to the reflecting surface of subreflector 11 changes the polarization of the wave reflected by the subreflector, and in this example the reflected wave becomes vertically polarized. This wave, after reflection from said subreflector means 11 and 12 is, in turn, reflected by the main reflector 13 in the well-known manner to form a desired beam or pattern. All this is illustrated in FIG. 1 by the various dotted rays. As indicated by the legend of FIG. 1, a horizontally polarized wave is indicated as a simple dotted ray path and a vertically polarized wave by an alternate dashdot ray path.
It will now be appreciated that since the feed and its associated waveguide is designed for a horizontally polarzed wave, that portion of the wave (as represented by ray path 14) that is directed back into feed 10 after reflection by the subreflector means 11 and 12 will be vertically polarized and will be rejected by the feed. As a result, the reflection by the subreflector means will not disturb the impedance characteristics of the feed.
Also, it will be appreciated that any part of the wave (as represented by ray path 15) radiated by the feed 10 which bypasses the subreflector means 11 and 12 is essentially horizontally polarized (in this example), while the desired wave radiated by the complete antenna is vertically polarized. In many applications in accordance with the invention, only that radiation which exists in the desired polarization will couple to the object with which the antenna is communicating, and in these cases the spurious radiation past the subreflector will have substantially no harmful effect.
It should further be appreciated that in many practical antennas, the feed 10 may radiate sidelobes of greater strength in the plane of its polarization than in the orthogonal plane. In prior art antennas designed to operate with vertical polarization, these sidelobes would tend to bypass the subreflector means 11 and 12, and those below the subreflector (as represented by ray path 15) could couple to the ground and create harmful effects. With the present invention, the feed can be oriented so that its plane of polarization is horizontal and only the weaker sidelobes couple to the ground. Thus the harmful effects caused by interaction of the ground with the spurious radiation past the subreflector may be minimized.
Referring now to FIG. 2, there is illustrated an example of polarization-changing means which may be utilized in accordance with the invention.
As shown in FIG. 2a, the polarization-changing means 12 may be in the form of a screen made up of a series of parallel metal wires, such as 19, supported by a thin fiberglass skin 26. Skin is supported and spaced from the metal surface 21 of the subreflector by a relatively low dielectric constant honeycomb material 22, whose thickness is such that the wires are effectively separated from the metal surface by approximately of the effective operating wave length. The term effective operating wave length refers to the actual wave length of a single frequency system or the average or midband wave length over an operating frequency band width, divided by the average cosine of the angles of incidence of the wave and the subreflector surface. The wire diameter and spacing 23 are such that the normalized inductive susceptance equals approximately 2. A wave incident in direction 24 and having a linear polarization, as indicated by arrow 25 in FIG. 2b, will be reflected with a polarization as shown by arrow 26. Similar polarizationchanging means used in a different manner are described in more detail in applicants application, Serial No. 80,961, filed January 5, 1961, and entitled Twistreflector, now Patent No. 3,161,879, and are also mentioned in applicants application, Serial No. 92,504, filed March 1, 1961, and entitled Double-Reflector Antenna With Minimum Aperture Blocking.
Referring now to FIGS. 3 and 4, there are shown arrangements whereby aperture blocking is reduced. In these antennas, polarization techniques are employed to render the feed invisible to these waves which would ordinarily be blocked by the feed.
In FIG. 3 the feed 30 is composed of thin horizontal elements fed by a transmission line 31, and is positioned between the subreflector means 11 and 12 and the main reflector 13. This type of feed will be termed a dipoletype feed. This feed may be greatly enlarged including many more members than are shown. When the feed 10 radiates a horizontally polarized wave toward subreflector means 11 and 12, the vertically polarized wave returned by the subreflector means passes through the feed substantially unaffected by the feed and is completely reflected by the main reflector 13, after which the wave again passes through the feed.
In the FIG. 4 arrangement, a horizontally polarized feed 10 is located behind the main reflector 40. The main reflector 420, which is positioned between the feed 10 and the subreflector means 11 and 12, includes a central portion in the form of a vertical grating 41. This grating is made up of thin parallel conductive wires closely spaced compared with a wave length and has the properties of being essentially a perfect reflector for a wave of polarization parallel to the wires and essentially invisible to a wave of perpendicular polarization; This grating may be supported in a fiberglass skin or by other methods. In the FIG. 4 arrangement the feed 10 radiates a horizontally polarized wave through the central grating 41 toward the subreflector means 11 and 12 which reflect the wave and change its polarization to vertical. This vertically polarized wave is then completely reflected by the main reflector 40 including grating 41.
In the configurations of both FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 it is evident that the subreflector means cause aperture blocking but the feed does not. Consequently, the feed may be greatly enlarged so that its increased directivity allows the subreflector to become quite small. As a design consideration, when the feed becomes equal to or larger than the subreflector, the phase front across the feed aperture should be curved so as to focus the feed. toward the vicinity of the main reflector focus. It should also be mentioned that when this condition exists, the historic geometry of the Cassegrain system no longer applies exactly. However, the basic operation of the antenna remains similar.
Another application for the technique of FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 involves a feed system having many independent radiators to achieve a particular requirement. One example is an antenna which must radiate a cluster of many adjacent beams; another example is a-shaped-beam antenna. When the compound feed system is large, it is desirable to eliminate the large amount of aperture blocking which it would ordinarily cause.
In an antenna actually constructed in accordance with the invention, the polarization-changing means had the following dimensions. The dimensions refer to FIG. 2 and all dimensions are normalized to wave length.
Wire 19 diameter 0.0461 Wire spacing 23 0.181 Honeycomb 22 thickness 0.291 to 0.351 Skin 20 thickness 0.0161
It will now be appreciated that antennas constructed in accordance with this invention avoid impedance mismatching of the feed due to radiated waves reflected back into the feed from a subreflector. Other benefits may be realized if spurious waves, created by direct radiation by the feed past the subreflector, are capable of causing harmful effects. Finally, the invention allows reduced aperture blocking by the feed and subreflector.
While the discussion of antennas in accordance with this invention has been directed mainly toward the transmission or radiation of waves by the antenna, the invention is equally effective during reception of waves by the antenna, by virtue of the reciprocity principle. It should also be appreciated that although the invention has been described for the case of a vertically polarized antenna with a horizontally polarized feed, it is also applicable to a horizontally polarized antenna and a vertically polarized feed, or other combinations of polarization.
While there have been described what are at present considered to be the preferred embodiments of this invention, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the invention and it is, therefore, aimed to cover all such changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
What is claimed is:
1. A Cassegrain-type antenna capable of receiving and transmitting a Wave of a predetermined polarization comprising: a feed having a polarization different from said predetermined polarization; subreflector means cooperating with said feed for reflecting and changing the polarization of an incident wave; and a main reflector positioned between said feed and subreflector means and having a grating which reflects waves of said predetermined polarization and passes waves of said different polarization.
2. A double-reflector antenna capable of receiving and transmitting a wave of a predetermined polarization comprising: a feed having a polarization different from said predetermined polarization; a subreflector cooperating with said feed; polarization-changing means coupled to said subreflector for producing a change in the polarization of a wave reflected by said subreflector; and a main reflector positioned between said feed and subreflector and having a grating which reflects waves of said predetermined polarization and passes waves of said different polarization.
3. A double-reflector antenna capable of receiving and transmitting a wave of a predetermined polarization comprising: a feed having a polarization differing by from said predetermined polarization; a subreflector cooperating with said feed; polarization-changing means coupled to said subreflector for producing a 90 polarization change in the polarization of a wave reflected by said subreflector; and a main reflector positioned between said feed and said subreflector and having a grating which reflects waves of said predetermined polarization and passes waves having a polarization differing from said predetermined polarization by 90.
4. A double-reflector antenna capable of receiving and transmitting signals of vertical polarization comprising: a horn dimensioned to support waves of horizontal polarization only; polarization changing subreflector means for changing a horizontally polarized wave radiated by said horn to a vertically polarized wave and for reflecting the vertically polarized wave back toward said horn; and a main reflector for redirecting said reflected wave back past said subreflector means; the antenna being so con structed and arranged that the horn is unaffected by the wave reflected by the subreflector means as a result of the change in polarization.
5. A double-reflector antenna in accordance with claim 4, wherein the aperture of said horn lies between the main reflector and the subreflector means.
References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,477,694 8/1949 Gutton 343837 X 2,736,895 2/1956 Cochrane 343-756 2,942,266 6/ 1960 Mattingly 343756 X 3,133,284 5/1964 Privett 343782 FOREIGN PATENTS 861,718 1/1953 Germany.
HERMAN KARL SAALBACH, Primary Examiner.
GEORGE N. WESTBY, Examiner.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2477694 *||Jul 19, 1946||Aug 2, 1949||Csf||Radio waves radiators|
|US2736895 *||Feb 15, 1952||Feb 28, 1956||Elliott Brothers London Ltd||High frequency radio aerials|
|US2942266 *||Jul 16, 1957||Jun 21, 1960||Bell Telephone Labor Inc||Antenna with means for preventing re-radiation into feed guide|
|US3133284 *||Mar 2, 1959||May 12, 1964||Rca Corp||Paraboloidal antenna with compensating elements to reduce back radiation into feed|
|DE861718C *||May 18, 1939||Jan 5, 1953||Telefunken Gmbh||Richtstrahlanordnung|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3990080 *||Jul 21, 1975||Nov 2, 1976||Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated||Antenna with echo cancelling elements|
|US4034378 *||Jul 21, 1975||Jul 5, 1977||Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated||Antenna with echo cancelling elements|
|US4195302 *||Oct 5, 1978||Mar 25, 1980||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Double reflector antenna with feed horn protection|
|US4689632 *||May 30, 1985||Aug 25, 1987||Rca Corporation||Reflector antenna system having reduced blockage effects|
|US5003321 *||Sep 9, 1985||Mar 26, 1991||Sts Enterprises, Inc.||Dual frequency feed|
|US5302962 *||Dec 5, 1989||Apr 12, 1994||European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom)||Antenna system producing a millimeter wave beam having a gaussian-like distribution|
|US6717552 *||Jan 8, 2002||Apr 6, 2004||The Boeing Company||Communications antenna system and mobile transmit and receive reflector antenna|
|US7522116 *||Feb 16, 2007||Apr 21, 2009||Agence Spatiale Europeenne||Multibeam antenna|
|US7633425||Nov 16, 2007||Dec 15, 2009||Ratheon Company||Waveguide system comprising reflective surfaces for directing a wave beam to a target|
|US20070195000 *||Feb 16, 2007||Aug 23, 2007||Peter Balling||Multibeam antenna|
|US20090128040 *||Nov 16, 2007||May 21, 2009||Brown Kenneth W||Systems and methods for waveguides|
|EP0088681A1 *||Mar 2, 1983||Sep 14, 1983||Thomson-Csf||Dual-reflector antenna with incorporated polarizer|
|EP0281042A2 *||Feb 27, 1988||Sep 7, 1988||Alliant Techsystems Inc.||Multi-spectral imaging system|
|EP0372463A1 *||Dec 5, 1989||Jun 13, 1990||European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom)||Antenna producing a millimeter wave beam having a gaussian-like distribution|
|EP0381037A1 *||Jan 25, 1990||Aug 8, 1990||Siemens-Albis Aktiengesellschaft||Antenna system|
|EP0384021A1 *||Dec 13, 1989||Aug 29, 1990||Hughes Aircraft Company||Antenna system having azimuth rotating directive beam with selectable polarization|
|EP2840412A1 *||Dec 6, 2013||Feb 25, 2015||Rohde&Schwarz GmbH&Co. KG||System and method for illumination and imaging of an object|
|WO1990006665A1 *||Dec 5, 1989||Jun 14, 1990||Euratom||Antenna producing a millimeter wave beam having a gaussian-like distribution|
|U.S. Classification||343/756, 343/781.00R, 343/782|
|International Classification||H01Q19/10, H01Q19/195|