Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3273144 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateSep 13, 1966
Filing dateApr 2, 1963
Priority dateApr 2, 1963
Publication numberUS 3273144 A, US 3273144A, US-A-3273144, US3273144 A, US3273144A
InventorsFishbein William
Original AssigneeFishbein William
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Narrow beam antenna system
US 3273144 A
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Sept. 13, 1966 w, FISHBEIN 3,273,144

NARROW BEAM ANTENNA SYSTEM Filed April 1963 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 HORN RADIATORS 22 F G ANTENNA I2 CORPORATE FEED CIRCUIT RECEIVER TRANSMITTER FIG. 2

TRANSMITTING ANTENNA PATTERN RECEIVING ANTENNA PATTERN C 20 o 0 n 20 ROUND TRIP PATTERN INVENTOR,

WILLIAM FISHBEI N ATTORNEY.

p 13, 1966 w. FISHBEIN 3,273,144

NARROW BEAM ANTENNA SYSTEM Filed April 2, 1963 2 Sheets-Sheet 2 HORN RADIATQRS\Y\Y FIG. 3 ANTENNA 32,, CORPORATE FEED CIRCUIT HORN RADIATORS I ANTENNAw, CORPORATE FEED CIRCUIT TRANSMITTER 28 RECEIVER VO LTS VO LTS ROUND TRIP RADIATOR PATTERN o go 40 so so o OVERALL ANTENNA PATTERN ANTENNA 32 FIG. 5

IKIa,I---- I l l l l l l l "l F27 INVENTOR,

i l i WILLIAM FISHBEIN ANTENNA 30 J ATTORNEY.

United States Patent Oflflce 3,273,144 Patented Sept. 13, 1966 3,273,144 NARROW BEAM ANTENNA SYSTEM William Fishbeiu, New Shrewsbury, N.J., assignor to the United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army Filed Apr. 2, 1963, Ser. No. 270,123 3 Claims. (Cl. 343-) The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the Government for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalty thereon.

This invention relates to a radar antenna system and more particularly to multiple-beam antenna systems having improved resolution without increasing the number of radiating elements of the antenna structure.

Radar resolution applies to the ability of a radar apparatus to distinguish between two closely situated targets. 'Heretofore, the solution for the problem of increasing resolution most commonly adopted by the art was to increase the number of radiating elements of the antenna structure. The increased number of radiators, of course, made such antennas diflicult to construct, too difficult to scan, and have proved to be too cumbersome to be properly handled. In battlefield application, in particularly, the antenna sizes are limited by tactical consideration. One approach to overcome this problem resides in the use of relatively short wavelengths. However, it is well known that as the frequency of a radar increases, the available transmitter power and receiver sensitivity rapidly decrease. The result of this decrease in transmitter power and receiver sensitivity is poo-r range performance.

The radiation or field strength pattern usually associated with radar apparatus are characterized by a single major radiation lobe whose ability to resolve between distant targets is a function of the size and the number of radiators of the antenna. Antenna configurations exhibiting narrow beam width in proportion to their size and number of radiators as compared with the more widely used radar antenna types are equally unsatisfactory because their field strength patterns are composed of a plurality of narrow lobes. The difiiculty with such a plurality of narrow lobes resides in the fact that, while capable of ample resolution, their usefulness for radar purposes is destroyed because there is no way to distinguish between the directivity of the different lobes when targets are detected.

It is an object of the present invention to provide a new and improved antenna system which avoids one or more of the limitations and disadvantages of prior antenna systems.

It is another object of the invention to provide a narrow beam antenna, which is relatively light in Weight, can be easily scanned and is relatively easy to construct.

In accordance with one embodiment of the invention there is provided a radar antenna system providing improved resolution which includes discrete transmitter and receiver antennas. The transmitter antenna, which radiates RF signal energy, has a directivity characten istic including a plurality of angularly spaced main lobes. The receiver antenna intercepts reflections of the radiated R-F signal energy and has a directivity characteristic including a single major lobe which is in the same direction as a selected one of the plurality of the spaced main transmitter antenna lobes. The beam width of the single lobe is such that it can detect signals derived from only one of the lobes of the transmitter antenna.

In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, the discrete transmitter and receiver antennas are both of the multiple-beam type, and each having approximately the same directivity characteristic. The

angular lobe spacing in one antenna with respect to the other is such that, over a prescribed angular sector, if one pair of transmitting and receiving lobes are made to coincide, the others will not coincide.

For a better understanding of the invention, together with other and further objects thereof, reference is had to the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of a radar antenna system in accordance with my invention;

FIG. 2 illustrates curves useful in explaining the operation of the FIG. 1 embodiment;

FIG. 3 represents a second embodiment of the radar antenna system; and

FIGS. 4 and 5 illustrate curves useful in explaining the operation of the FIG. 3 embodiment.

Referring now to FIG. 1 of the drawing, at 10 there is shown an improved antenna system for a radar. The radar antenna system comprises a multiple-beam type transmitting antenna 12 and a receiving antenna 14. Multiple-beam antenna 12 comprises a linear array of a prescribed number of spaced waveguide 'horn radiators, and radiates the R-F energy in a pattern comprised of a plurality of angularly spaced main lobes. The number of lobes will, of course, depend upon the number of radiators provided, and the spacing between lobes and the beam width of the lobes will depend upon the spacing between radiators and the aperture width. The receiving antenna 14 includes a receiving element 16 and a reflecting surface 18. The shape of reflecting surface 18 and receiving element 16 may be constructed in any one of several conventional shapes, the parabolic cylinder and line source, respectively, being represented in FIG. 1. The beam width of the receiving lobe pattern is chosen such that it can pick out any reflected signal derived from a selected one of the lobes of the multi-beam transmitter antenna pattern, while the remaining transmitter antenna lobes fall outside the main lobe of the receiver antenna beam and, consequently, are reduced by the side lobe level of the receiver antenna beam. In one embodiment of my invention, for operation at a wavelength of 1.86 centimeters, for example, transmitting antenna 12 comprised ten linearly aligned horn radiators 22, each with a 20 db gain and spaced 30 wavelengths apart. These radiators are fed in phase by means of a conventional corporate feed structure represented by the block 24 so that there is produced a uni-form phase front over a 500 megacycle frequency band. -It is to be understood, of course, that any other suitable feeding circuit may be used to provide the uniform phase front. The blocks 26 and 28 comprise the transmitter and receiver of the radar and are conventional. With the arrangement hereinabove described, the resulting transmitted antenna pattern will be approximately as shown in FIG. 2A. Every two degrees there is a main lobe 0:16 degree wide. As shown in FIG. 2B the receiving antenna 14 has a beam width of about 1.5 degrees so that it can pick out any selected one of the 0.16 degree main lobes of the transmitter antenna pattern. The round trip antenna pattern is shown in FIG. 2C. It can be seen in FIG. 2C that the remaining transmitting lobes fall outside the main lobe of the receiver antenna beam and are reduced by the side lobe level thereof. Scanning the multiple-beam transmitting antenna 12 may be accomplished by rotating the pedestal it is mounted on or by employing phase shifters in the lines that feed the horn radiators. Mechanical or ferrite phase shifters may be used. The scan angle, of course, is limited to the beam width of the individual horns. With such an arrangement, the system may be programmed by rotating only the receiver antenna 14 in synchronism with the amount of phase shift.

FIG. 3 illustrates another embodiment of my invention. In FIG. 3, the transmitting and receiving antennas 30 and 32 are both of the multiple-beam type and each comprise a linear array of Waveguide horns fed by appropriate respective corporate feed structures. Both antennas are arranged to provide multiple lobe patterns. However, the wavelength spacing between the radiators in multiple-beam transmitting antenna 30 is made different than the wavelength spacing between the radiators in multiple-beam receiving antenna 32. The lobe spacing in both antennas is chosen such that if one pair of transmitter and receiver antenna lobes are made to coincide, the others will not coincide over the angular sector of interest. For example, should the radiator element spacing of transmitter multi-beam antenna 30 be 18 wavelengths, the lobes Will be spaced by 3.15 degrees. A radiator element spacing of 16 wavelengths for the receiver multi-beam antenna 32 will result in a lobe spacing of 3.50 degrees. Thus, when the orientation of the respective antennas is such that the broadside lobes coincide, there will not be an overlap until approximately 32 degrees have passed. If the individual radiators have a 20 degree beamwidth, the second overlap will be in the side lobes of the transmitted radiator pattern. The round trip pattern will thus have only one lobe. Assuming that the individual radiator elements are considered as being isotropic radiators, and are uniformly illuminated, FIGS. 4A and 4B show the calculated patterns for the multiplebeam receiving and transmitting antennas 32 and 30, respectivley. FIG. 4C shows the round trip pattern of an individual radiator. FIGURE 4D is the pattern resulting from the multiplication, in space, of the patterns shown in FIGS. 4A, 4B and 4C, and illustrated a coincidence at The only lobes plotted are those greater than 40 db below the main lobe. It should be noted that there is one main lobe, with secondary lobes at least 14 db down. The 14 db secondary lobe level is a result of the assumption of uniform illumination of the individual horn antennas. A tapered illumination would result in a secondary lobe level of db to db.

The two horn antennas and 32 of FIG. 3 could be easily scanned in synchronism by using phase shifters in the feed lines to the individual radiators. A 20 degree sector could be mechanically scanned without moving either antenna more than 3.5 degrees from its initial position. The scanning sequence is as follows: Both antennas face broadside, which causes the broadside lobes to coincide. The two antennas scan in synchronism for 3.15 degrees. The antennas are returned to the broadside position. The antenna with the lobe spacing of 3.50 degrees is then indexed 0.35 degree with respect to the second antenna. This indexing causes the lobes which are 3.15 degrees from broadside to coincide. Both antennas now scan in synchronism for 3.15 degrees, thus covering the second 3.15 degree sector. The antennas are again returned to the broadside position. The transmitting antenna is indexed an additional 0.35 degree With respect to the receiving antenna. Now the lobes which are 6.3 degrees from broadside coincide. The process is repeated until the entire 20 degree sector has been scanned.

The optimum spacing of the receiver and transmitter radiator elements can be determined by the following analysis and reference to FIG. 5.

n =radiator wavelength spacing of receiver antenna 32, n =radiat0r wavelength spacing of transmitter antenna where n n 'y=bearnwidth of each antenna array in radians, fl=beamwidth of individual radiators in the array in radians.

The values of n and 11 must be chosen to satisfy two conditions. First, if the two lobes of a pair are made to coincide, the second coincidence must occur in the side lobe region of the pattern of an individual radiator. That is to say, if the first coincidence is made to occur at the 3 db point of the radiator pattern, the second coincidence should not occur until angle 1.53 has passed. Second, the minimum spacing between pairs of lobes should be twice the array beam width. If both these conditions are satisfied, there will be only one main lobe in the round trip pattern. FIG. 5 shows the relative positions of the lobes of the two antennas shown in FIG. 3 when both conditions are satisfied. It is to be understood, of course, that the antennas 30 and 32 could readily be interchanged, that is, antenna 30 .could. be the receiving antenna and antenna 32 could be the transmitting antenna, and the systems would operate in the same manner.

Now, as shown in FIG. 5, the spacing between lobes of antenna 32 is given by 1 TL} and the spacing between lobes of antenna 30 is given by l 0 2 Hz Assuming K lobes of antenna 32 before second coincidence, then Hence, there will be K +1 lobes of antenna 30 before the second coincidence and thus In order to satisfy the second condition hereinabove described,

The following relationship between 12 and n may be obtained from Equations 3 and 4 Since, in general, 1.5fin 1, Equation 10 can be simplified to 3'yfin =1 (12) and from Equation 8 While there has been described what is at present considered to be the preferred embodiment of this invention, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the invention, and it is therefore aimed in the appended claims to cover all such changes and modifications as fall Within the true spirit :and scope of the invention.

What is claimed is:

1. A radar antenna system providing improved reso- 5 such that over a prescribed angular sector if one pair 15 of transmitting and receiving lobes are made to coincide, the others will not coincide.

2. The radar antenna system in accordance with claim 1 wherein the beam width of the individual lobes in said first and second antennas are identical.

3. The system in accordance with claim 2 wherein the lobe spacing of said first and second multiple-beam antennas are related such that where n is the wavelength spacing between radiators in said first antenna,

n is the wavelength spacing between radiators in said second antenna, and B is the beam width of the individual radiators in said first and second antennas.

References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,426,183 8/1947 Deloraine et a1. 34316 2,527,547 10/ 1950 Hardy.

2,990,544 6/1961 La Rosa 343100.12 3,016,531 1/1962 Tomiyasn et a1. 343-11 X CHESTER L. IUSTUS, Primary Examiner.

20 LEWIS H. MYERS, Examiner.

R. D. BENNETT, Assistant Examiner.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2426183 *Jun 3, 1943Aug 26, 1947Int Standard Electric CorpReflected wave direction finder
US2527547 *May 15, 1943Oct 31, 1950Int Standard Electric CorpSelf-contained radio guiding apparatus for mobile craft
US2990544 *Apr 30, 1957Jun 27, 1961Hazeltine Research IncRadar antenna system providing improved resolution
US3016531 *Mar 14, 1955Jan 9, 1962Sperry Rand CorpAntenna distribution system
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3500414 *Oct 25, 1968Mar 10, 1970Us NavyThinned antenna array with reduced grating lobe ambiguities
US3825928 *Feb 14, 1972Jul 23, 1974Hughes Aircraft CoHigh resolution bistatic radar system
US3842417 *Feb 14, 1972Oct 15, 1974Hughes Aircraft CoBistatic radar system
US5583956 *Jun 14, 1994Dec 10, 1996The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversityEstimation of skew angle in text image
US5745084 *Oct 13, 1995Apr 28, 1998Lusignan; Bruce B.Very small aperture terminal & antenna for use therein
US5797082 *Jan 9, 1997Aug 18, 1998Terrastar, Inc.Communication receiver for receiving satellite broadcasts
US5913151 *Jul 7, 1997Jun 15, 1999Terrastar, Inc.Small antenna for receiving signals from constellation of satellites in close geosynchronous orbit
US5930680 *Jan 9, 1997Jul 27, 1999Terrastar, Inc.Method and system for transceiving signals using a constellation of satellites in close geosynchronous orbit
US6075969 *Jan 9, 1997Jun 13, 2000Terrastar, Inc.Method for receiving signals from a constellation of satellites in close geosynchronous orbit
US6512934Jun 1, 1998Jan 28, 2003Ntt Mobile Communications Network, Inc.Adaptive array antenna
CN102084267BJun 30, 2009Jul 17, 2013安希欧普公司Methods and systems for encoded broadcasting and antenna reception, particularly for radar
DE2306407A1 *Feb 9, 1973Aug 30, 1973Hughes Aircraft CoRadargeraet hoher winkelaufloesung mit getrennten sende- und empfangsantennen
EP0923155A1 *Jun 1, 1998Jun 16, 1999Ntt Mobile Communications Network Inc.Adaptive array antenna
WO2010000742A1 *Jun 30, 2009Jan 7, 2010Claude GoutelardMethods and systems for encoded broadcasting and antenna reception, particularly for radar
Classifications
U.S. Classification342/350, 343/725, 342/147, 343/893
International ClassificationH01Q21/29, H01Q21/08, G01S19/25, G01S1/02
Cooperative ClassificationH01Q21/08, G01S1/02, H01Q21/29
European ClassificationG01S1/02, H01Q21/29, H01Q21/08