Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3279762 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateOct 18, 1966
Filing dateMar 11, 1964
Priority dateMar 11, 1964
Publication numberUS 3279762 A, US 3279762A, US-A-3279762, US3279762 A, US3279762A
InventorsBruns William Henry
Original AssigneeOtis Elevator Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Noise abating and traction improving elevator sheave
US 3279762 A
Abstract  available in
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Oct. 18, 1966 w.- H. BRUNS 3,279,762

NOISE ABATING AND'TRACTION IMPROVING ELEVATOR SHEAVE Filed March 11, 1964 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 WILL/14H HEN/f) 5UN5 INVENTOR BY ATTORNEY United States Patent Filed Mar. 11, 1964, Ser. No. 350,999 8 Claims. (Cl. 254-190) This invention relates to elevators and more especially to an arrangement for electric traction machine elevators.

The development of steel framework building construction and the consequent increase in building height which occurred in the early part of this century accompanied the development of the electric traction machine elevator and the subsequent abandonment of drum type machines which necessarily had become larger and more costly with the increased rise of elevator installations. With the adoption of traction machines, a previously unexperienced condition which is now commonly referred to as rope slip was introduced to elevator operation. Rope slip is the undesirable movement of the ropes in relation to the surface of the drive sheave caused by the failure of the sheave and roping arrangement to develop sufi'lcient traction, or tractive effort, to maintain complete and positive control over the movable loads. Such movement results in lowered efliciency, reduced accuracy of movement, and accelerated rope wear.

To prevent rope slip, two practical and presently utilized arrangements were devised. One of these employs steel or semi-steel sheaves having undercut metallic rope grooves. This is generally used with single wrap geared traction machines used in medium and low speed installations. The other arrangement employs steel or semi-steel sheaves having round seated metallic rope grooves and is used with double wrap gearless traction machines where the duty load and speed require more traction, or tractive effort, than it is desirable to develop with single wrap geared traction machines.

Nothwithsanding these two arrangements are widely employed, they have drawbacks. grooves cannot deflect any substantial or practicable amount and because of this, rope creep occurs'causing the rope and rope groove to Wear. Rope creep is the change in the position or movement of the rope relative to a sheave surface which results from rope stretch caused by the change in the tension in the rope When traveling over a drive sheave while carrying an unbalanced load. This creep may also result from one or more of the several grooves on a pulley or sheave having a greater diameter than its companion grooves. This causes the sheave to take or deliver more rope in one groove than in another, with resultant different tensions in the ropes; and where the difference is great enough, with resultant rope slip.

The rope wear resulting from creep occurs because the metal surface of the groove acts abrasively on the wires in the outside layers of the ropes strands. To minimize the effect of this wear on the service life of the rope, the strands of the rope customarily are made with the outside-layer wires having a relatively larger diameter than the rated bearing strength of the strand, or rope, would require. The larger such wires are, the greater the stress they are subjected to during bending over the sheave. Also, it is thought that greater size, and, increased Wire stress, causes greater tendency of the wire to break. Thus, to secure the maximum service life from a rope intended for elevator service it is customary to fashion the outside layers of the strand from wire having a larger diameter than that of the inner layers of wire. This difference in presently diameters is usually the result of a compromise between Metallic-rope 3,279,762 Patented Oct. 18, 1966 large size for increased wear and smaller size for increased bend expectancy.

Other shortcomings are inherent to both the single and double wrap traction arrangements because of the cus tomary practice employed to provide the tractive effort required to maintain complete control over the movable loads. The tractive effort that can be provided by these arrangements is dependent upon the pressures exerted by the ropes in their grooves. These pressures, in turn, are functions of the tensions in the ropes at both sides of the sheave. Generally, the live load and its counterbalancing mass are not heavy enough to produce the tension necessary to provide the required tractive effort and, in order to increase these rope tensions so that the required tractive effort is provided, the weights of the car and its counterweight are made heavier than otherwise would be necessary. As a result of increasing the weights of the car and its counterweight, a sheave shaft must be provided which is of sufficient size to support the added load, and a motor must be provided which is of sufficient size to perform the added work. Ordinarily these provisions increase both the size of the components and the cost of installation.

These aforementioned and various other disadvantages in using metallic ropes in metallic sheave grooves have long been well known in the elevator industry. Nevertheless, this knowledge has not produced a satisfactory solution for these problems.

It is, therefore, one of the objects of this invention to provide a novel arrangement for electric traction machine elevators which improves the service life of elevator ropes.

It is another object of this invention to provide a novel arrangement for electric traction machine elevators which increases the amount of traction, or tractive effort, that can be developed by such elevators.

It is another object of this invention to provide a novel arrangement for electric traction machine elevators which yields sufiicient traction, or tractive effort to be employed with relatively light weight elevator cars.

It is another object of this invention to increase the applicability and use of single wrap traction machines and thereby avoid the expense that accompanies the use of double wrap traction machines. I

It is a further object of this invention to quiet the usual noise of operating metal ropes in metal sheave grooves at relatively high linear speeds.

A still further object of the invention is the provision I of an arrangement which will encourage the use of a metal rope of the desired capacity in which all strands are of equal optimum size.

In carrying out this invention the elevator ropes as they pass over or around one or more of the sheaves are supported exclusively on a pliable element arranged intermediate the groove surface and the elevator rope.

One of the features of this invention is that the traction, or tractive effort developed between the drive sheave and ropes is controllable according to the configuration and the hardness of the pliable element.

Another feature of this invention is that smaller motors can be employed in elevator installations.

Still another feature of this invention is that smaller sheave shafts can 'be employed in elevator installations.

Other objects and features of this invention will be evident from the following description and appended claims when read in conjunction with the drawing, in which:

FIGURE 1 is a simplified perspective of elevator ropes supported on a pliable element secured to a driving sheave;

FIGURE 2 is a sectional view of a sheave arranged for relative rotation of the individual groove sections for the purpose of eliminating the effect of unequal groove diameters on multi-groove sheaves.

11 (FIG. with channels 13 in its rim portion is mounted on shaft 12 (FIG. 1) of the elevator drive motor (not shown). Each channel 13 has a flat bottom surface 15 and two divergent wall surfaces 17 each of which is surmounted at the open end of the channel by a lip 19.

Lining the entire channel 13, and seated tightly therein so as to prevent movement, is a pliable support element in the form of an elastomer strip, or insert 21 (FIG. 3) having a groove section 23 and shoulder section 25. Lips 19 abutting shoulder sections 25 of insert 21 serve further to secure the insert in channel 13 and retain it bottomed on surface 15. Grooves 23 in which elevator ropes 31 are supported are made with alternate voids 33 and treads 35. The reason for this treading arrangement can best be explained by referring to the several graphs shown in FIGURE 6.

From the graph of FIG. 6a it can be seen that a dry, round strand, regular lay rope supported in a smooth surfaced, round seated elastomer groove can develop much better tractive efiort over the same range of rope tension than the same rope supported in a round seated steel groove. Furthermore, the elastomer causes farless abrasive wear on the rope than the steel. However, the graph of FIG. 6b reveals that the addition of a lubricating mixture of graphite and albacote to the rope causes a more marked decrease in the traction that can be developed with the smooth surfaced elastomer groove than in that which can be developed with the round seated steel groove. From this it would be reasonable to expect that when the lubricant in the core of an elevator rope exuded into a .smooth surfaced elastomer groove the traction capable of being developed would be undesirably decreased.

The treading arrangement of insert 21 practicallyelim- .inates this undesirable decrease in tractive effort arising from exuding lubricants.

This may be seen from the graph of FIG. 6c where the traction developed by a rope lubricated with graphite and albacote on a treaded elastomer groove and the traction developed by the same lubricated rope on a round seated steel groove are both presented. This graph clearly illustrates that a well lubricated rope can develop more traction when supported in a treaded elastomer groove than in a round seated steel groove. Thus any lubricant exuding from elevator ropes 31 does not to any appreciable extent adversely effect the traction that can be developed with the treaded elastomer insert 21. The reason for this is that any lubricant exuded from ropes 31 is squeezed into voids 33 upon initial rope contact with sheave 11 by the pressure between the ropes and the bearing surfaces 37 of treads 35 and by the squeegee action of the leading edges of treads 35. This leaves the ropes substantially dry for contact with bearing surfaces 37 throughout the entire arc of contact over sheave 11. Upon ropes 31 leaving contact with sheave 11 the lubricant is thrown from the uncovered -voids by gravity and centrifugal force.

flection reduces rope creep and results in decreased rope and sheave groove wear. However, some groove wear does occur and unequal sheave groove diameters do result.

When unequal sheave groove diameters exist on sheaves with metal grooves the ropes in some of the grooves slip during each revolution of the sheave. With treaded elastomer grooves the ability of treads 35 to deflect radially equalizes the diameters of unequally worn grooves and reduces the slip due to such grooves accordingly.

The reductions in both creep and slip accompanying the use of the treaded elastomer groove further decreases the effects of abrasion on the outside wires of elevator ropes. Thus a inch rope with .029" diameter outside wires was no more adversely afiected by abrasion than Was a inch rope with .041" diameter outside wires. Consequently, if treaded elastomer grooves are used the size of the outside wires of elevator ropes can be reduced. This results in a further increase in the life of the ropes since smaller wires are less rapidly broken by the cold bending stresses experienced in passing over the drive sheave. Additionally, an unforeseen advantage of using ropes having smaller outside wires with treaded elastomer grooves is that they develop more tractive effort than ropes with larger outside wires.

It can be seen from the graph of FIG, 7a that a dry clean rope in a smooth surfaced elastomer groove can develop more tractive effort than one in a treaded elastomer groove and that the same rope in a treaded elastomer groove can develop more tractive efiort than one in a round seated steel groove. One reason for this is the exertion on the ropes by the elastomer sheave grooves of side pressures acting perpendicular to the sheave radius and parallel to its axis. The existence of these pressures is demonstrated by the fact that under a condition where such pressures substantially cannot exist, namely, where a one-half inch, round strand, regular lay rope is supported in a five-eighths inch diameter treaded elastomer groove, the tractive effort that can be developed under various rope tensions is much less than under a condition where such pressures can exist, such as, where a five-eighths inch, round strand, regular lay rope is supported in the five-eighths inch diameter treaded groove. These results are plotted on the graph of FIG. 7b.

These side pressures are inversely proportional to the amount of deflection the elastomer groove undergoes. substantiating this are two discovered facts, first, a treaded groove which deflects more than a smooth surfaced groove develops less tractive effort than does the latter groove, and, second, a treated groove or softer material develops less tractive effort than a groove of a harder substance (see the graph of FIG. 70 for the curves substantiating this second fact). Consequently, since developed tract ive effort is affected by the magnitude of side pressure, the amount of tractive effort capable of being developed by a specific elastomer groove can be predetermined in accordance with the deflective characteristics of the groove. This is significant because the size of the hearing surface area of the treads, the relationship between the area of the treads and the area of the voids, and the hardness of the material of which the insert is composed, all of which contribute to controlling the amount of tractive effort capable of being developed by a driving sheave are all variable factors.

With the increase in the amount of developed tractive effort resulting from the use of the treaded elastomer groove plus the ability to control the amount of developed tractive effort by choice of material and type of treading the single wrap machine arrangement with a treaded elastomer groove is applicable for many duties for which it is now desirable to use the double wrap arrangement.

throughout the life of the insert after the groove wore into and thereafter maintained a substantially semielliptical shape. The treads on this insert were threesixteenths of an inch along the circumference of the groove and two-sixteenths of an inch high. Adjacent treads were separated by a two-sixteenths of an inch void.

One of the difficulties associated with the use of metal ropes in metal grooves is the increased rope noise that is experienced as the height of the building and the speed of the elevator are increased. A part of this arises from the strands of the rope contacting the groove surface as the rope engages the sheave. The noise so produced is sometimes called rope patter. This patter may occur at a frequency close to the natural frequency of vibration of a length of rope, such as between the drive and secondary sheaves, in which case rope vibration occurs to produce a noise of a somewhat diflferent character, and much more noticeable than it otherwise would be.

In addition to rope patter there is a degree of noise introduced into the car by rope creep and to a greater degree by rope slip. This is especially true of those installations using 2 to 1 roping on multiple groove sheaves. As a practical matter of manufacture it is difficult to machine each of several sheave grooves to have the same diameter. If each groove is not of the same diameter it carries a greater or lesser length of rope than its companion groove carries on each revolution. This will result in creating different rope tensions and may result only in causing rope creep if the differences are relatively small. If, however, this differences are great enough the difference in tensions will exceed the traction that the rope and groove are capable of creating and the rope will slip in a series or multiple of short lengths. These slips, in addition to harming the rope, give rise to noise in the car which becomes more noticeable as the linear speed of the ropes increase. The use of the elastomer inserts in the sheave grooves eliminates these objectionable products.

These effects arising from the differences in groove diameters on the idler sheaves of the car and counterweight of 2 to 1 roping systems can also be alleviated by the free running sheave illustrated in FIGURE 2 of the drawing. As is shown there, the sheave shaft 50 supports bearings 55, which may suitably be of the ball type, which in turn support the sheave hub 51. This hub supports a plurality of individual sheaves, each having a flange section 56 and a rim section 57 in which a groove 60 is machined. These individual sheaves are each mounted on the hub 51 and secured there by clamping rings 52, which are bolted to hub 51 by a pair of bolts 53. The right most sheave is also bolted to the adjacent clamping ring by one or more bolts 54, such that it turns in unison with the rings and hub. The remaining sheaves are each mounted with a plastic bearing 58 intermediate the hub 51 and the flange section such that each one is free to rotate on the hub. A similar plastic bearing surface 59 is interposed between adjacent rim sections. In this manner each sheave section can adjust its speed of rotation to equal the linear speed of its conjugate rope; the speed of which is a function of the speed of revolution of its drive sheave and the diameter of its driving groove. Because the differences in groove diameters are small, the various individual sheaves will make substantially the same number of revolutions in a full length trip; the differences between them being usually in fractional revolutions. This permits the use of plastic bearings 58, 59 which may be composed from polytetrafluoroethylene which is a fluorocarbon resin commercially available under the trademark Teflon. This may be used alone or in combination with an adulterant to improve its wearing properties. One such product is commercially available under the trademark Rulon.

An additional benefit to be derived from the treaded groove is that the high rope tensions presently used with metal driving sheave grooves for developing sufficient tractive effort are not required with the treaded elastomer grooves. This permits the use of lighter weight cars which ultimately results in a decrease in the size of the sheave shaft and in the required motive power.

It is contemplated that this invention is susceptible to modifications which will make it more suitable for different conditions without departing from the scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown on the accompanying drawing be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.

What is claimed is:

1. A multi-groove driving sheave for a traction machine elevator over which a plurality of hoisting ropes pass in tension, comprising, a rim, pliable material forming a plurality of grooves along and around the rim of said sheave, each of said grooves supporting a hoisting rope and preventing said rope from contacting any rigid material while passing over said sheave, treads formed in each of said grooves providing the bearing surfaces for said ropes, and voids intermediate adjacent treads such that the tractive effort capable of being developed by said sheave is a function of the relationship between the bearing surface area of said treads and the area of said voids.

2. A multi-groove driving sheave according to claim 1 in which said rim has formed therein a plurality of channels equal to the number of said hoisting ropes and said pliable material is in the form of an equal number of elastomer inserts, a separate insert lining the entirety of a different one of each of said channels, each said insert having formed therein one of said grooves in which is supported one of said hoisting ropes.

3. A multi-groove driving sheave according to claim 1 in which said pliable materal is polyurethane.

4. A multi-groove driving sheave according to claim 2 in which each of said channels has a bottom surface and two side wall surfaces with a lip atop each side wall surface; each said elastomer insert is fitted tightly within its respective channel and has a bottom surface abutting the bottom surface of its channel and two side surfaces each abutting a different side wall surface of its channel, whereby movement of each said insert with relation to its channel is substantially prevented; each said insert also has two shoulder surfaces, one each abutting one of said channel lips, whereby each said insert is secured in its channel and retained bottomed therein; said grooves are formed in the upper surfaces of said inserts; said treads are formed transversely in each of said grooves; and in which the tractive effort capable of being developed by said sheave is also a function of the deflective characteristics of said insert.

5. A multi-groove driving sheave according to claim 2 in which each of said channels has a bottom surface and two side wall surfaces which are divergent from the bottom surface, each side wall surface having a lip formed atop it; each said elastomer insert is polyurethane and is seated lightly within and substantially entirely fills its respective channel; each said insert has a bottom surface abutting the bottom surface of its channel and two side surfaces, which are divergent from the bottom surface, abutting the two side wall surfaces of its channel, whereby movement of each said insert with relation to its channel is prevented; each said groove is formed in the upper surface of its insert; each said insert has a shoulder on each side of its groove abutting one of its channels lips whereby each said insert is secured in its channel and retained bottomed therein; said treads formed in said grooves are deflectible under the pressure of the ropes bearing on them to minimize any differences in the diameters of said grooves and to exert side pressures on said ropes; and, in which, the tractive effort capable of being developed by said sheave is also a function of the deflective characteristics of said treads.

6. A multi-groove driving sheave according to claim 2,

in which each said elastomer insert is seated tightly within its respective channel and is substantially immovable in relation thereto; each said channel has a lip atop each of its sides, said lips retaining said inserts in their respective channels; each said groove has a semi-circular cross section; said treads in each said groove are formed transverse the circumference of said sheave; and, in which, the tractive effort capable of being developed increases as the surface area of said treads increases in relation to the area of said voids.

7. A multi-groove driving sheave according to claim 6 in which each said insert is polyurethane.

8. A multi-groove driving sheave according to claim 2 in which each said elastomer insert is seated tightly within its respective channel and is substantially immovable in relation thereto; each said groove has a semi-circular cross-section and supports one of said hoisting ropes as it passes over said sheave; said treads in each said groove are formed transverse the circumference of said sheave; the cross-sectional diameter of each said groove is substantially equal to that of the rope it supports, whereby pressure exerted by said ropes on the treads in said grooves deflects them causing them to exert pressure on References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,560,524 11/1925 Avery 74230.7 2,017,149 10/ 1935 Greening 74230.7 2,148,123 2/1939 Hymans 18794 2,628,709 2/ 1 3 Steinmetz 74-23 0.7 2,673,470 3/ 1954 Cosmos 74230.7 2,707,403 5/ 1955 Thomson 74230.7 2,922,310 1/ 1960 Anderson 254-19 2 2,954,702 10/ 1960 Petersen 74--230.7

EVON C. BLUNK, Primary Examiner. HUGO O. SCHULZ, Examiner.

H. C. HORNSBY, Assistant Examiner.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1560524 *Jul 9, 1924Nov 10, 1925Avery Edward SPulley
US2017149 *Aug 8, 1931Oct 15, 1935Galloway Engineering Company LRope sheave
US2148123 *Oct 5, 1938Feb 21, 1939Otis Elevator CoElevator suspension device
US2628709 *Feb 23, 1949Feb 17, 1953Jeffrey Mfg CoSelf-cleaning grooved rubber covered pulley
US2673470 *Jul 30, 1952Mar 30, 1954Cosmos William JHigh-speed, low-vibration drive pulley for flat belts
US2707403 *May 27, 1952May 3, 1955Mavor & Coulson LtdConveyor driving pulleys
US2922310 *Feb 1, 1957Jan 26, 1960Anderson John WComposite pulley structure
US2954702 *Jun 7, 1956Oct 4, 1960Petersen Gerald A MBull wheel structure for cable tension stringing mechanism
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3434362 *Jan 15, 1968Mar 25, 1969Continental Granite CorpWheel for wire type stone-cutting saws
US3620504 *Apr 2, 1969Nov 16, 1971Speedcranes LtdCranes, derricks, or the like lifting gear
US3719099 *Jan 29, 1971Mar 6, 1973Gen Electric Co LtdDrive wheel for friction mine hoist
US3810529 *May 25, 1973May 14, 1974Westinghouse Electric CorpElevator system
US4013142 *Oct 7, 1975Mar 22, 1977Westinghouse Electric CorporationElevator system having a drive sheave with rigid but circumferentially compliant cable grooves
US4402488 *Nov 13, 1981Sep 6, 1983Westinghouse Electric Corp.Sheave
US4465161 *Feb 16, 1982Aug 14, 1984Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaElevator winding device
US4687376 *Aug 31, 1984Aug 18, 1987Santa Fe International CorporationMulti-reel operational lines laying vessel
US4721411 *Feb 2, 1987Jan 26, 1988Santa Fe International CorporationMulti-reel operational lines laying vessel
US4723874 *Feb 2, 1987Feb 9, 1988Santa Fe International CorporationMulti-reel operational lines laying vessel
US4789108 *Feb 2, 1987Dec 6, 1988Santa Fe International CorporationMulti-reel operational lines laying vessel
US4820082 *May 11, 1987Apr 11, 1989Santa Fe International CorporationPipeline laying system and vessel
US4961671 *Feb 26, 1990Oct 9, 1990Santa Fe International CorporationMethod of converting a pipeline laying vessel from a pivotal ramp type to an arcuate type
US5112933 *Apr 16, 1991May 12, 1992Otis Elevator CompanyImproved durability
US5135079 *Feb 28, 1991Aug 4, 1992Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaNoise prevention apparatus for a cable winch elevator
US5205793 *May 6, 1991Apr 27, 1993Campbell Hausfeld/Scott Fetzer CompanyRope or chain hauling pulley
US5792294 *Nov 16, 1995Aug 11, 1998Otis Elevator CompanyMethod of replacing sheave liner
US5881843 *Oct 15, 1996Mar 16, 1999Otis Elevator CompanySynthetic non-metallic rope for an elevator
US6164053 *Feb 2, 1999Dec 26, 2000Otis Elevator CompanySynthetic non-metallic rope for an elevator
US6364061 *May 24, 2000Apr 2, 2002Otis Elevator CompanyTension member for an elevator
US6371448 *Oct 11, 2000Apr 16, 2002Inventio AgRope drive element for driving synthetic fiber ropes
US6386324 *May 24, 2000May 14, 2002Otis Elevator CompanyElevator traction sheave
US6401871 *Feb 26, 1998Jun 11, 2002Otis Elevator CompanyTension member for an elevator
US6405833 *Jan 6, 2000Jun 18, 2002Otis Elevator CompanyFlexible flat rope sheave assembly with separate shoulder and flange surfaces having varying friction properties
US7377366 *Nov 25, 2002May 27, 2008Otis Elevator CompanySheave assembly for an elevator system
US7461721 *Sep 22, 2003Dec 9, 2008Kone CorporationElevator and traction sheave of an elevator
US7766307 *Mar 14, 2008Aug 3, 2010Mactaggart, Scott (Holdings) LimitedCable handling device
US7874404Sep 29, 1998Jan 25, 2011Otis Elevator CompanyElevator system having drive motor located between elevator car and hoistway sidewall
US7971856 *Nov 29, 2006Jul 5, 2011J.R. Clancy, Inc.Drive rope and drive pulley
US8020669 *Oct 22, 2007Sep 20, 2011Kone CorporationElevator and traction sheave of an elevator
US8069955Apr 22, 2003Dec 6, 2011Kone CorporationElevator and traction sheave of an elevator
US20030183458 *Apr 22, 2003Oct 2, 2003Jorma MustalahtiElevator and traction sheave of an elevator
WO1998016681A2 *Sep 3, 1997Apr 23, 1998Otis Elevator CoSynthetic non-metallic rope for an elevator
WO2007075163A1 *Dec 28, 2005Jul 5, 2007Otis Elevator CoSheave for use in an elevator system
Classifications
U.S. Classification254/266, 474/175, 187/254, 474/168, 254/393, 474/178
International ClassificationF16H55/50, B66D3/06
Cooperative ClassificationB66D3/06, B66B15/04, B66D2700/028, F16H55/50
European ClassificationB66D3/06, B66B15/04, F16H55/50