|Publication number||US3295138 A|
|Publication date||Dec 27, 1966|
|Filing date||Oct 31, 1963|
|Priority date||Oct 31, 1963|
|Publication number||US 3295138 A, US 3295138A, US-A-3295138, US3295138 A, US3295138A|
|Inventors||Nelson Bruce K|
|Original Assignee||Sylvania Electric Prod|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (45), Classifications (9)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Dec. '27, 19.66 B. K. NELSOIN PHASED ARRAY SYSTEM Filed 001.- 31, 1953 2 Sheets-Sheet l |8 2e LDELAY LINE k S l2 2Q 5 DELAY LINE M N I4 22 [ll E -oEA IF IG- 1 DELAY LINE I6 24 o DELAY LINE E INVENTOR.
BRUCE K. NELSON BY ,5 a
United States Patent Ofifice 3,295,138 Patented Dec. 27, 1966 3,295,138 PHASED ARRAY SYSTEM Bruce K. Nelson, Concord, Mass., assignor to Sylvania Electric Products Inc., a corporation of Delaware Filed Oct. 31, 1963, Ser. No. 320,426 Claims. (Cl. 343-854) This invention relates to phased array antennas and more particularly to digitally controlled beam steering systems therefor.
In a phased array antenna, the antenna beam is steered by adjusting the relative phase shifts in individual antenna element channels of the array such that coherent addition of signals received by the array occurs for signals arriving from a specified direction. These arrays are, however, inherently frequency sensitive due to the frequency dependent nature of the signal phase, and, consequently, the antenna beam steering direction. To overcome the disadvantage of frequency sensitivity that is inherent in these arrays, time delay steering has evolved wherein signals propagating in each antenna element channel are time delayed by selected amounts in order to bring the signals into time coherence, and thus steer the antenna beam to a specified direction. A broadband beam steering system can, therefore, be provided by varying the time delay, rather than the phase shift, in each element channel.
Heretofore, various systems have been proposed to implement time delay steering. In-one known system, a helical delay line is employed and a variable time delay provided by coupling signals off the delay line at various points on the helix. Another known scheme employs a plurality of fixed delay lines, such as coaxial cables, each having a different delay time, which are individually switched into an antenna element channel to provide a given time delay. These techniques, however, suffer the disadvantages of slow switching speeds, being cumbersome to fabricate, and unwieldy in size and weight. A primary object of the present invention is, therefore, to provide a phased array having a compact, rapidly adjustable, time delay beam steering system.
Another object of the invention is to provide a phased array having a beam steering system employing switched delay lines.
A further object of the invention is to'provide a phased array beam steering system having binary controlled switched delay lines.
Briefly, the invention comprises a phased array beam steering system in which binary controlled switched delay lines are employed to appropriately delay signals in each antenna element channel. Each switched delay line comprises a plurality of fixed time delays which are variously combined to produce successive increments of delay in response to binary control signals. Binary control is especially advantageous since it can be easily provided :by well-known means, and in addition, rapid switching speeds are practicable with such control. Accordingly, an antenna beam can be rapidly steered in response to binary control signals.
The foregoing, together With other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a phased array antenna employing time delay steering;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a switched delay line in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a four-bit binary switched delay line in accordance with the invention; and
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a preferred embodiment of the invention.
Referring to FIG. 1, there is shown a phased array receiver consisting of antenna elements 10, 12, 14, and 16, connected, respectively, to delay lines 18, 20, 22, and 24, which are of progressively decreasing length. The outputs of these delay lines are connected to a summing network 26, the output E of which is a signal representative of the antenna beam. It is evident that a received signal e arriving, for example, at an angle 6 with respect to the broadside axis of the array takes increasingly longer times to reach elements 12, 14, and 16 than to reach element 10. In order to bring the received signal into time coherence, and thus enhance the sensitivity ofthe array to a signal arriving at an angle 6, the signals in each element channel must be suitably delayed such that coherent addition can be achieved. Thus, a signal arriving at an angle 0, and received by elements 10, 12, 14, and 16, is delayed 'by delay lines 18, 20, 22, and 24, each of which provides progressively less delay of suitable magnitude to bring the signals into time coherence. The magnitude of the delay in each element channel is proportional to the distance of its respective antenna element from the electrical center of the array, as is well known. Of course, the array can function equally as Well in the transmitting mode, in this event the summing network being replaced by a power dividing network to energize the antenna elements, as is also well known.
In order to steer the array through a given angular sector it is, of course, necessary to suitably vary the interchannel time delay. An expeditious way of providing this variable time delay is by a binary controlled switched delay line, illustrated in FIG. 2, wherein two signal paths are provided, one path having a relatively greater time delay than the other. By switching between these two signal paths, either of two time delays can be provided in response to appropriate binary control signals. Alternatively, one signal path can have essentially zero time delay, in which case switching between signal paths provides either zero delay or some finite delay. A greater number of time delays can be provided by serially connecting individual switched delay lines to provide a multisection delay line of the type shown in FIG. 3, as will be more fully explained hereinafter. Referring now to FIG. 2, diodes 28, 30, 32, and 34 are arranged in a bridge configuration with a signal path 36 between the anodes of diodes 28 and 30, and a second signal path 38 of greater length than path 36, disposed between the anodes of diodes 32 and 34. Diodes 28 and 30 are rendered conducting by a suitable direct current bias signal E applied to bias line 56, while diodes 32 and 34 are caused to conduct by a direct current bias signal E applied to bias line 58. Signal paths 36 and 38, and input and output lines 52 and 54, respectively, are, for example, strip transmission lines. Other energy transmission means can be employed in the construction of a switched delay line, although the circuit configuration lends itself particularly to a strip transmission line embodiment.
In order to isolate the RF signal paths from the biasing circuit, a suitable decoupling circuit must be employed, a typical one being illustrated in FIG. 2 and consisting of quarter wave sections 40, 42, 44, and 46, and capacitors 48 and 50. Capacitors 48 and 50 have a low re-v actance at the operating frequencies thereby presenting a high impedance to the direct current bias signals E and E respectively. At RF frequencies, however, capacitor 48 offers essentially a short circuit from point 60 to ground. This short circuit, translated through quarter wave section 40, presents a high impedance at point 62. In this manner, RF energy propagating through signal path 36 is not affected by the biasing circuit since the latter is decoupled by the high impedance at point 62. In like manner, a high impedance is presented at point 64 due to the reflected short circuit to ground through capacitor 50. Thus, RF energy propagating through signal path 38 is unaffected by the biasing circuit due to the high impedance at point 64.
In operation, a signal e applied to input line 52 can propagate by way of either signal path 36 or 38, depending on which path is activated. Bias signal E applied to bias line 56 causes diodes 28 and 30 to conduct thereby presenting a low impedance to RF energy present on input line 52, which allows signal e to propagate through diode 28, path 36 and diode 30, to the output line 54-. Since bias signal E is not applied, the diodes 32 and 34 are not conducting and, therefore, present an open circuit to oppose the flow of RF energy in signal path 38. On the other hand, a bias signal E applied to bias line 53, causes diodes 32 and 34 to conduct thus allowing signal e to traverse the path consisting of diode 32, delay path 38, and diode 34, to output line 54. Path 38 being longer than path 36, an output signal e appearing on line 54, has one of two delays, depending on which signal path is traversed. Thus, if the length of signal path 38 is dimensioned such that it has a time delay 1- with respect to the time delay of path 36, a time delay 7' can be imparted to the output signal e depending upon whether path 36 or 38 is energized by bias signals E or E respectively. It is seen that bias signals E and E are binary in nature, one being applied while the other is not; therefore, digital control means can be employed to vary the time delay.
By expanding the design of a switched delay line of the type shown in FIG. 2 to a multi-section delay line, such as that illustrated in FIG. 3, a greater number of time delay increments is possible, and particular advantage can be made of the simplicity of digital control. Referring to FIG. 3, a four-section switched delay line is shown with the output of each section connected to the input of each succeeding section. Signal paths 72, '74, 76, and '78 have essentially zero time delay, while signal paths 82, 34;, 86, and 88 have time delays in the ratio 1-:2T:4T:8-r, respectively, where 1- is the smallest increment of time delay. It is evident that time delays from zero to 1ST, in integral multiples of 1-, are possible by judiciously combining the various signal paths. To provide zero delay, an input signal e is directed through signal paths 72, '74, 76, and 78 to the output line 80. For a maximum delay of 151, input signal e is directed through signal paths 82, 84, 86, and 88 to output line 80. Intermediate values of delay are provided by shunting the input signal through selected combinations of signal paths. RF decoupling is provided as in the delay line of FIG. 2.
The operation of each delay line section is identical to that of the delay line of FIG. 3. For example, a bias signal E causes diodes 92 and 4 to conduct, thereby providing a low impedance path by which input signal c can traverse signal path 72. Similarly, a bias signal E applied to bias line 96 energizes diodes 98 and 100, thereby allowing the input signal to propagate through delay path 82. In like manner, a bias signal applied to bias lines 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, and 112, respectively, causes the corresponding diodes to conduct, thereby shunting the input signal through the signal path associated with the conducting diodes.
It will be remembered that the bias signals applied to each section of the delay line are binary in nature, and it is evident that binary values to 1 can be assigned to the OFF and ON bias signals, respectively. The bias signal applied to each section of the delay line is, therefore, equivalent to one bit in a four-bit binary word. Thus, the binary progression 0000, 0001, 1111, is representative of the progression of bias signals required to provide progressively increasing time delays from 0 to -r, in increments of '7'. For a given time delay, the binary control word necessary to provide that delay is applied, respectively, to bias terminals 06, 104, 108, and 112, while the complement of this binary word is applied, respectively, to
bias lines Q0, 102, 106, and 110. Thus, a variable time delay can be provided by well known digital control techniques, with the accompanying advantages of extremely fast speed, and relative simplicity of equipment.
The incorporation of these binary controlled switched delay lines into an antenna array is illustrated in FIG. 4, wherein a five element linear array is schematically shown including antenna elements 120, I22, 124, 126, and 128, each having associated therewith a respective switched delay line 139, 32, 134, I36, and 138. The output of each switched delay line is connected to a summing network 140, the output E of which is a signal representative of the assembled antenna beam. Suitable biasing of each switched delay line is provided by a binary ontrol 142, which can be one of several well known means, such as a digitally programmed power supply.
The antenna array can, of course, be used equally well for both transmitting and receiving, the beam steering system being essentially the same in both instances. For simplicity of explanation, its operation will be described in the receiving mode. In operation, a signal received by each antenna element is applied to a corresponding switched delay line which introduces the appropriate time delay into each element channel in response to a proper binary control signal produced by binary control 142. The output signal from each switched delay line is thus suitably time delayed so that coherent addition of the signals from each antenna element can be accomplished by summing network 1443. To scan the antenna beam, it is merely necessary to appropriately alter the binary control signals applied to each switched delay line. As an illustration of the expediency of binary control, consider the situation where the electrical and physical center of an array are coincident. In the embodiment of FIG. 4, the center would be at antenna element 124. Since the time delay for a given element channel is related to the distance of the antenna element of that channel from the electrical center of the array, it is evident that the delay inserted in each element channel on one side of the array center must have an equal and opposite time delay inserted in corresponding element channels on the opposite side of the array center. For example, in the embodiment of FIG. 4, for a given beam steering direction, the time delay associated with delay line 132 is the complement of the time delay associated with delay line 136. Similarly, the time delays associated with delay lines 13% and 138 are complementary. These complementary time delays are easily provided by applying a suitable binary control word to the appropriate switched delay lines on one side of the array center, while applying the binary complement of these words to the corresponding switched delay lines on the opposite side of the array center.
From the foregoing, it is evident that a phased array has been provided having a compact, rapidly adjustable, binary controlled, time delay beam steering system. The invention is not, of course, limited to the particular embodiments or construction illustrated and described herein, as many alternatives will occur to those skilled in the art. For example, while a linear array is illustrated, the invention can be employed with equal advantage in a twodimensional array. In addition, the switched delay lines can be of a variety of constructions and can have as many delay paths as are necessary to suit the particular operating requirements. Accordingly, it is not intended to limit the invention by what has been particularly shown and described, except as indicated in the appended ciaims.
What is claimed is:
1. In a phased array antenna system which includes a plurality of antenna elements and a like plurality of signal processing channels, means for steering said array to a selected direction comprising, a source of binary control signals, and a switched delay line operatively associated with each of said channels, each of said switched delay lines comprising, a first plurality of delay lines having substantially zero time delay, a second like plurality of delay 5 lines having in succession time delays of geometrically increasing value, and diode switching means connected between respective ones of said first and second plurality of delay lines and operative in response to said binary control signals to selectively combine said delay lines to provide selected amounts of delay in each channel.
2. The invention according to claim 1 in which said diode switching means includes a diode bridge and RF isolated biasing circuitry.
3. The invention according to claim 2 in which said RF isolated biasing circuitry comprises a quarter wave transmission line section and a capacitor connected in series between each delay line and ground to thereby provide a high impedance to RF signals propagating in said delay lines.
4. The invention according to claim 1 in which said binary control signals are representative of progressively increasing binary numbers.
5. The invention according to claim 1 in which said second plurality of delay lines have fixed time delays related in a geometric progression with a common ratio of two.
References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS OTHER REFERENCES Inst. Elec. Eng; November 1959, pages 555-58; D. W. Morris et al., Universally Steerable Aerial System.
HERMAN KARL SAALBACH, Primary Examiner.
E. LIEBERMAN,'C. BARAFF, Assistant Examiners.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2829346 *||Nov 23, 1956||Apr 1, 1958||Itt||Pulse generator|
|US3056961 *||Aug 12, 1958||Oct 2, 1962||Post Office||Steerable directional random antenna array|
|US3145383 *||Feb 23, 1960||Aug 18, 1964||Avco Corp||Signal synthesizer system|
|US3160887 *||Mar 30, 1960||Dec 8, 1964||Cie Generale De Telegraphic Sa||Broadside array with adjustable coupling network for beam shaping|
|US3192530 *||Oct 24, 1962||Jun 29, 1965||Small Bernard I||Electronically scanned array with diode controlled delay network|
|US3211899 *||Aug 30, 1962||Oct 12, 1965||Shreve James S||Delay line apparatus|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3354461 *||Nov 15, 1963||Nov 21, 1967||Kelleher Kenneth S||Steerable antenna array|
|US3400405 *||Jun 1, 1964||Sep 3, 1968||Sylvania Electric Prod||Phased array system|
|US3453623 *||Jul 5, 1967||Jul 1, 1969||Technology Uk||Phase-optimized antennae system|
|US3471808 *||Jun 9, 1966||Oct 7, 1969||Itt||Phase shifter having different length conductors inserted into circuit by reed relays|
|US3518669 *||Sep 20, 1968||Jun 30, 1970||Us Air Force||Time scanned array radar|
|US3568097 *||Nov 18, 1969||Mar 2, 1971||Texas Instruments Inc||Switched line length phase shift network for strip transmission line|
|US3568105 *||Mar 3, 1969||Mar 2, 1971||Itt||Microstrip phase shifter having switchable path lengths|
|US3710145 *||Feb 1, 1971||Jan 9, 1973||Raytheon Co||Improved switching circuitry for semiconductor diodes|
|US3775696 *||Nov 18, 1971||Nov 27, 1973||Texas Instruments Inc||Synchronous digital system having a multispeed logic clock oscillator|
|US3869693 *||Nov 22, 1967||Mar 4, 1975||Us Navy||Scanning arrangement for sonar beams|
|US3887925 *||Jul 31, 1973||Jun 3, 1975||Itt||Linearly polarized phased antenna array|
|US3959750 *||May 22, 1975||May 25, 1976||Sanders Associates, Inc.||Microwave diode switch wherein first diode carries greater control signal current than second diode|
|US3982214 *||Oct 23, 1975||Sep 21, 1976||Hughes Aircraft Company||180° phase shifting apparatus|
|US4063250 *||Dec 16, 1975||Dec 13, 1977||Electrospace Systems, Inc.||Beam and null switch step steerable antenna system|
|US4346315 *||Aug 25, 1980||Aug 24, 1982||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||Switched delay line for steerable null antenna system|
|US4405907 *||Oct 26, 1981||Sep 20, 1983||Rca Corporation||Controllable phase shifter comprising gyromagnetic and non-gyromagnetic sections|
|US4673942 *||Nov 6, 1984||Jun 16, 1987||Nec Corporation||Array antenna system|
|US4751453 *||Jun 17, 1986||Jun 14, 1988||Era Patents Limited||Dual phase shifter|
|US4772893 *||Jun 10, 1987||Sep 20, 1988||The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration||Switched steerable multiple beam antenna system|
|US4931753 *||Jan 17, 1989||Jun 5, 1990||Ford Aerospace Corporation||Coplanar waveguide time delay shifter|
|US5034708 *||Jul 30, 1990||Jul 23, 1991||Automatic Testing And Networking, Inc.||Programmable broadband electronic tuner|
|US5136265 *||Jul 11, 1989||Aug 4, 1992||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Discrete increment signal processing system using parallel branched n-state networks|
|US5307033 *||Jan 19, 1993||Apr 26, 1994||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||Planar digital ferroelectric phase shifter|
|US5495211 *||Jan 3, 1995||Feb 27, 1996||E-Systems, Inc.||Reconfiguration microstrip transmission line network|
|US6043722 *||Apr 9, 1998||Mar 28, 2000||Harris Corporation||Microstrip phase shifter including a power divider and a coupled line filter|
|US6191735 *||Jul 28, 1997||Feb 20, 2001||Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc.||Time delay apparatus using monolithic microwave integrated circuit|
|US6275120||Feb 17, 2000||Aug 14, 2001||Harris Corporation||Microstrip phase shifter having phase shift filter device|
|US6853272 *||Nov 15, 2002||Feb 8, 2005||National Semiconductor Corporation||Linear voltage controlled capacitance circuit|
|US6989788 *||Sep 16, 2002||Jan 24, 2006||Continental Microwave & Tool Co., Inc.||Antenna array having apparatus for producing time-delayed microwave signals using selectable time delay stages|
|US7053732 *||Sep 23, 2002||May 30, 2006||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)||Multi-bit time delay adjuster unit for high RF applications and method|
|US7090560||Jul 28, 2004||Aug 15, 2006||3M Innovative Properties Company||System and method for detecting abrasive article orientation|
|US7206471 *||Dec 23, 2004||Apr 17, 2007||Lucent Technologies Inc.||Integrated circuit having an optical core|
|US7724189 *||Nov 24, 2004||May 25, 2010||Agilent Technologies, Inc.||Broadband binary phased antenna|
|US20040246073 *||Sep 23, 2002||Dec 9, 2004||Shu-Ang Zhou||Multi-bit time delay adjuster unit for high rf applications and method|
|US20060025045 *||Jul 28, 2004||Feb 2, 2006||3M Innovative Properties Company||System and method for detecting abrasive article orientation|
|US20060025046 *||Jul 28, 2004||Feb 2, 2006||3M Innovative Properties Company||Abrasive article splicing system and methods|
|US20060025047 *||Jul 28, 2004||Feb 2, 2006||3M Innovative Properties Company||Grading system and method for abrasive article|
|US20060025048 *||Jul 28, 2004||Feb 2, 2006||3M Innovative Properties Company||Abrasive article detection system and method|
|US20060119513 *||Nov 24, 2004||Jun 8, 2006||Lee Gregory S||Broadband binary phased antenna|
|US20060140533 *||Dec 23, 2004||Jun 29, 2006||Sinsky Jeffrey H||Integrated circuit having an optical core|
|DE3725066A1 *||Jul 29, 1987||Feb 6, 1997||Thomson Csf Radant||Mikrowellenantenne mit Strahlungsdiagramm-Synthese|
|EP0212796A1 *||Jun 16, 1986||Mar 4, 1987||Era Patents Limited||Dual phase shifter|
|EP0254649A1 *||Jul 24, 1987||Jan 27, 1988||Thomson-Csf||Process and device for compensating the frequency dispersion in an electronically scanned antenna and its use in a landing system of the MLS type|
|EP0840394A2 *||Oct 28, 1997||May 6, 1998||HE HOLDINGS, INC. dba HUGHES ELECTRONICS||Ultrabroadband, adaptive phased array antenna systems using microelectromechanical electromagnetic components|
|EP0840394A3 *||Oct 28, 1997||Jun 3, 1998||HE HOLDINGS, INC. dba HUGHES ELECTRONICS||Ultrabroadband, adaptive phased array antenna systems using microelectromechanical electromagnetic components|
|U.S. Classification||342/375, 327/269, 327/263, 327/407, 342/374, 333/164|