Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3305993 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateFeb 28, 1967
Filing dateJun 10, 1964
Priority dateJun 10, 1964
Also published asDE1559446A1
Publication numberUS 3305993 A, US 3305993A, US-A-3305993, US3305993 A, US3305993A
InventorsNels Nelsson
Original AssigneeUnited States Gypsum Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Sound control wall construction
US 3305993 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Feb. 28, 1967 NELSSON SOUND CONTROL WALL CONSTRUCTION Filed June 10, 1964 7 1 1.. H E x I w; IHWM JI .II 1 J J v v H l A 1H 1 1 O f J7Z0e% M519 M21560- JOHN KENNETH WISE ATW United States Patent Illinois Filed .iune 10, 1964, Ser. No. 373,941 3 Claims. ((31. 52-481) This invention relates to a hollow wall construction and more particularly to a lightweight wall construction which has superior sound control properties, especially with respect to sound transmission.

In the modern apartment house, oilice building, hotel and other buildings of this nature, sound insulation is becoming increasingly significant and this consideration is often difiicult to satisfy simultaneously with other important requirements. The rising costs of construction have brought about a tendency to make nonload-bearing walls as thin and light as possible to save space and to reduce the strength requirements of the supporting structure. The problem is to build a wall which will have maximum opacity to sound with a minimum weight, a reasonable cost of construction and present a surface which will satisfy the practical and esthetic requirements of the building occupants.

The need for sound isolation is especially important in the construction of partitions designed for use as party walls, that is, walls separating occupancies in apartments, offices, motels and hospitals. In order for these partitions to be practical, the design must also provide a means of installing electrical outlets, plumbing, medicine cabinets and the like without destroying the sound isolation provided. In conventional wall construction, such service installations result in a ready path or short circuit for sound to pass through the partition with a consequent objectionable destruction of sound privacy in adjoining rooms.

Previously, sound isolation has been achieved by double wall partitions through costly and weighty modifications in the wall, as by increasing its mass or by acoustically isolating the walls one from the other. In one relatively expensive wall construction, for instance, the spaced apart walls are isolated one from the other by means of resilient clips attached to the support members. In other modifications to increase the mass of the partition, layers of building board are laminated together to form a heavy double or triple layer of laminated building boards for one side of a wall construction.

It is an object of this invention, therefore, to provide a wall or partition construction of relatively low weight which possesses adequate structural strength and is able to provide a high degree of sound insulation. It is a further object of this invention to provide a partition construction having desirable acoustical properties without the usual accompanying loss in structural rigidity.

Another object of this invention is to provide a wall or partition construction utilizing conventional materials wherein an exceptional degree of sound isolation is provided. It is a further object of this invention to provide a relatively fool-proof construction wherein the high degree of acoustical isolation provided is not destroyed by common installation of electrical outlets, plumbing, medicine cabinets and such within the wall construction.

These and other objects of the invention are obtained by the provision of a partition comprising three layers of wallboard in which a rigid septum board is positioned between two spaced apart parallel rows of vertical support members with the members in one parallel row offset from the members in the other row, in combination with two rigid face boards secured to the vertical support members, this forming one composite structure.

The vertical support members may be light gauge steel channels or box studs, wood, laminated gypsum board or other stud materials well known in the industry but a light gauge steel channel is preferred. By securing the septum member to the studs, improved structural versatility can be achieved with very little change in acoustic efiiciency. The acoustical properties of the partition are further enhanced if the cavities between the studs are filled with a sound absorbing material such as mineral wool batts, cellular insulation, and foamed plastic.

Referring now to the drawing, a hollow partition of drywall construction is shown having three layers of spaced apart building boards 10, 12 and 14, respectively, secured to and spaced apart by two parallel rows of vertically extending support members 16 and 18, respectively. The vertical support members 16 and 18 are, for example, conventional channel shaped metal studs secured in the usual manner to floor runners 20 and ceiling runners 22. The studs of one row are located intermediate and are desirably spaced equidistant between the studs of the other parallel row.

' In a preferred embodiment of our invention, the septum member 12 is a sheet of gypsum wallboard but other rigid materials such as mineral fiber sound deadening board and wood fiber acoustical board may be used. The septum member is secured to both rows of studs by adhesive means or with mechanical fasteners 9, preferably metallic rotary type screw fasteners, such as are more particularly described in US. Patent No. 3,056,234, the fasteners engaging the inner flanges 24 and 26 of the studs. For optimum properties joints 6 in the septum member should be sealed with a bead of non-setting filler material or caulking compound 7 and this material should also be used to seal the septum to the ceiling and floor. It is preferred that the joints 6 be vertical and fall on a stud but the boards maybe run horizontally and the seams caulked.

The face members 10 and 14 are preferably paper covered gypsum wallboard but other materials of similar physical properties may likewise be used. The surface joints may be finished with tape and joint compound according to procedures well known in the art but slightly superior acoustical performance has resulted when the joints were finished with the use of a batten strip 30. The partition may be finished at the floor line with a conventional base 31. Higher transmission loss ratings have been achieved when, in erecting the face layers of wallboard, the screw fasteners are used only at the margins of the board and the intermediate studs'are attached to the board with a contact adhesive.

While the partition just described will give acoustical performance far superior to that heretofore known, this can be increased further by fillng the space between the studs with a sound absorbing material 32 such as mineral fiber batts, acoustical wool, etc. It also has been discovered that the acoustical performance of the partition can be measurably increased if the face layers 10 and 14 have an outer surface of plastic film. An adhesively attached layer of polyvinyl chloride 0.008" thick has been found very suitable but other thicknesses and films of other materials such as polyethylene, polypropylene, polyesters, etc., may be used.

To assemble the foregoing partition, a first row of floor and ceiling metal runners is installed, secured with suitable fasteners 8 to the floor and ceiling and then the vertical supporting members 24 are attached to the floor and ceiling runner at a spacing of about 24" center to center. The septum member is cut to approximately ceiling height, with the board disposed with its longitudinal dimension parallel to the vertical support members. The longitudinal edges of the building board are positioned so that they are located approximately at the center of the supporting member flanges 24. In this manner, the building boards forming the center or septum wall abut each other approximately at the center of the flanges. After securing the building boards to the first row of stud flanges, it is preferable to seal all of the perimeter joints, that is, the joints between adjoining or abutting wallboards and between the wallboard and the floor, ceiling and intersection with other walls to eliminate potential sound leaks using a non-hardening caulking compound, such as Press- Tite caulking, manufactured by the Presstite Engineering Company, St. Louis, Missouri, or drywall adhesive DWA- 14, manufactured by United States Gypsum Company.

The second row of floor and ceiling runners and the second row of vertical studding are then installed in a similar manner to the installation of the first row of support members, but with the vertical support members in the second row approximately centered laterally between two adjoining support members in the first row.

After installation of the second row of support members, the septum layer of building boards is secured to the second row of support members by adhesive or with mechanical fasteners, such as 1" drywall screws spaced about twenty four inches center to center. Thus the septum board is securely fastened to both rows of support members on their inner flanges 24 and 26, respectively, for maximum structural utility.

Ceiling height gypsum wallboards are then securely fastened to the exterior portions of the two rows of supporting members with the longitudinal edges of the wallboard positioned at about the vertical center of the stud flanges. Conventional fastener and finishing meansmay be used with respect to the face layers of the partition. In the preferred construction, the exterior walls are solid since greater sound isolation is thus provided by three solid spaced apart layers joined together by two offset rows of vertical support members offset one from the other horizontally. By offset rows of support members it is meant that the vertical support members in one row are positioned approximately median the support members in the other row, that is, the entire one row of support members is offset from the other row.

In addition to the construction illustrated, many modifications may be made and are contemplated here by applicants, such as forming the face layers on one or both sides of plain or perforated plaster base or metal lath and then providing a finished wall surface by plastering thereover. The exceptionally high sound isolation result achieved by applicants construction is illustrated by the following Table A which presents the sound transmission resistance results of various triple wall partitions representative of applicants invention in comparison to other constructions when determined and reported according to ASTM method E9061T.

'As will be noted, constructions (1), (2) and (3) in Table A relate particularly to the partition of this invention. Applicant used 1" rotary-type screw fasteners to secure the septum wall layer of one half inch thick gypsum wallboard to both rows of studs and also fastened the exterior layers of gypsum wallbo-ard to the exterior portions of the studs by driving rotary-type screw fasteners through vertical aluminum batten strips along the longitudinal joint of the exterior wallboards, using contact type adhesive to secure the wallboard to intermediate studs.

It is to be particularly noted that the sound transmission class ratings of 53 to 56 achieved with partition assemblies (1), (2) and (3) are exceptionally high. Class ratings of about 55 have been reported to be near the practical limit for at about this value flanking paths of sound transmission become significant. This means that the amount of sound transmitted through the floors, ceilings, ducts, windows, etc., is large enough that a further reduction in the amount transmitted through the walls is of no consequence.

These high class ratings are even more surprising because of the relatively simple construction involved, and especially in view of the very light weight which was between 7 and 8 pounds per square foot. The next lightest partition was the 2" solid partition of gypsum board (4) and this weighed over 10% pounds per square foot and had a far poorer sound transmission rating. The other construct-ions, (5) to (7), all weighed over 11 pounds per square foot. Thus not only does the partition of this invention yield exceptionally good sound transmission loss results, but such results are obtained at a saving in unit weight, which may result in highly desirable savings in structural steel in a building.

TABLE A Sound transmission rating of partitions Sound transmission class (I) Preferred partition assembly of three spaced apart layers of half inch gypsum wallboard (1 /2 inches total) secured to 2 parallel offset rows of vertical metallic 2 /2 inch drywall studs with a two inch thick blanket of sound attenuating mineral wool between the septum layer and both face layers (2) Partition assembly of same construction as (1) except vinyl coated gypsum wallboard used for exterior layers (3) Partition assembly of same construction as (2) except mineral wool used between septum layer and one exterior layer only A (4) A two-inch solid partition of a one-inch thick gypsum board laminated on both sides to a layer of one-half inch gypsum board supported by metal floor and ceiling runners (5) A hollow double wall partition of two walls each having a one-inch thick gypsum board laminated to an outer layer of one-half inch gypsum board, the walls separated by a 1" air space, supported by metal floor and ceiling runners (6) A hollow double wall partition of 2 spaced apart Walls of gypsum wallboard secured to 3 /8" wide metal studs "a 39 (7) Same as (6) except each wall having 2 layers of gypsum wallboard laminated together 46 From the above results shown in Table A it is apparent that the partition construction of this invention produces an exceptionally high and unexpected degree of sound isolation, and does so at no sacrifice in weight, cost or complexity. Various modifications of this structure will, of course, occur to those skilled in the art' For example, wood or laminated gypsum studs may be substituted for the metal channel studs previously described and the face layers may be comprised of gypsum wallboards laid horizontally, the horizontal joint between boards in such construction being sealed either by tape and sealing cornpound or by a horizontal batten strip.

While I have shown several embodiments of my invention above, I do not wish to be limited thereto, since many modifications of my invention may be made, and it is, therefore, contemplated by the appended claims to cover any such modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of this invention.

I claim:

1. A sound control partition comprising, in combination, first and second parallel rows of studs, the studs of said first row being intermediate the studs of said second row, said rows being offset by a distance equal to the thickness of a septum member, a rigid planar septum member between said rows of studs, securing means attaching said septum member to the studs in each of the two rows, said securing means attaching said septum to a stud in said first row being laterally spaced from said securing means attaching said septum member to a stud in said second row, and first and second outer surface defining layers attached to said first and second rows of studs respectively and parallel to said septum member.

2. The partition of claim 1 wherein the septum mem- References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS ODonnell 52481 Vernon 52407 Walters 52-481 Walters 52267 Jacobsen 52-481 Frische 52407 Hoffman 52481 lied upon.

Woodworth 52243 Heritage 52407 Macormack 52481 Fink 52664 FOREIGN PATENTS Great Britain.

OTHER REFERENCES 10 American Builder Magazine, August 1963, page 82 re- U.S. Gypsum Co. Catalog, Demountable Partition System, November 1962, pages 6 and 7 relied upon.

U.S. Gypsum Co. Catalog, How To Control Sound, 15 July 1962, page 3 relied upon.

FRANK L. ABBOTT, Primary Examiner. R. A. STENZEL, Assistant Examiner.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US405794 *Dec 20, 1888Jun 25, 1889 Construction of buildings
US1096773 *Oct 21, 1913May 12, 1914James M VernonBuilding construction.
US1876528 *Jul 27, 1931Sep 6, 1932 Intebior building wall structure
US1990259 *Jul 20, 1932Feb 5, 1935Walters Hugo LBuilding wall structure
US2132032 *Nov 10, 1936Oct 4, 1938Alex Jacobsen AagePartition wall
US2160066 *Nov 16, 1935May 30, 1939Sperry Gyroscope Co IncSoundproofing construction
US2264377 *Dec 13, 1939Dec 2, 1941Hoffman John LPrefabricated building
US2341305 *Oct 16, 1940Feb 8, 1944Gladding Mcbean & CoSound deadening wall construction
US2541762 *Dec 4, 1943Feb 13, 1951Wood Conversion CoDry-wall construction
US2885743 *Jun 2, 1953May 12, 1959Alumiseal CorpInsulating structures for refrigerated spaces
US3027983 *May 13, 1958Apr 3, 1962Wheeling Steel CorpStudding
GB190512133A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3381429 *Aug 10, 1964May 7, 1968Michael RichWall systems
US3481090 *Apr 5, 1968Dec 2, 1969Angeles Metal Trim CoSupport track for dry wall construction
US3638641 *Nov 19, 1969Feb 1, 1972Arcoa IncMultiphasic medical examinations screening laboratory construction
US3925875 *Jul 8, 1974Dec 16, 1975Angeles Metal Trim CoMethod of constructing a prefabricated wall module
US3986312 *Oct 5, 1973Oct 19, 1976Ralph CalhounDemountable wall assembly and components therefor
US4283893 *Apr 27, 1979Aug 18, 1981Flake Duane WMethod and apparatus for forming a studless wall system
US4285184 *Sep 4, 1979Aug 25, 1981Turner Jr Ralph LMethod of sound-proof window construction for building structures
US4471591 *Aug 8, 1983Sep 18, 1984Jamison Walter EAir impervious split wall structure
US4478018 *Jul 28, 1981Oct 23, 1984Holand John FThermal break exterior insulated wall framing system
US4716695 *Jul 8, 1985Jan 5, 1988Alexander Theodore GSteel framing system for multi-story buildings
US4718211 *Oct 29, 1986Jan 12, 1988Greenstreak Plastic Products CompanyBatten bar for single ply membrane used on roofs
US4817356 *Feb 19, 1987Apr 4, 1989Scott Christopher RConstruction systems and elements thereof
US5022210 *Dec 29, 1989Jun 11, 1991Scott Christopher RConstruction systems and elements thereof
US5127760 *Jul 26, 1990Jul 7, 1992Brady Todd AVertically slotted header
US5129138 *Jul 16, 1990Jul 14, 1992Jay StensrudModular drywall construction method
US5210990 *Jun 28, 1989May 18, 1993Concept Resources Group, Ltd.C-channel construction member
US5467567 *Mar 8, 1995Nov 21, 1995The Reinforced Earth CompanySpring biased apparatus for maintaining precast panels in a stable removable position in a vertical slot
US5493834 *Apr 15, 1994Feb 27, 1996Mitek Holdings, Inc.Building structures, methods of construction, and wall framing section therefor
US5749187 *Sep 4, 1995May 12, 1998Yoshino Gypsum Co., Ltd.Partition wall
US5782054 *Jan 17, 1997Jul 21, 1998Forintek Canada Corp.Wood wall structure
US5787651 *Jul 31, 1996Aug 4, 1998Modern Materials, Inc.Sound deadening wall assembly
US5907930 *Nov 26, 1997Jun 1, 1999Ricco, Sr.; John A.Shooting range
US6199866May 19, 1999Mar 13, 2001John A. Ricco, Sr.Shooting range target carrier
US6330775 *Jul 20, 1999Dec 18, 2001Richard L. HubbardPrefabricated building wall structure
US7059093 *Jan 6, 2003Jun 13, 2006Feature Presentation, Inc.Methods, systems, kits, and fabrications of acoustic-panel-based build-in wall structures providing for variable linear spans
US7197853 *Aug 31, 2000Apr 3, 2007W. Frank Little, Jr.Demountable and reusable wall and ceiling system
US7513082 *Feb 8, 2005Apr 7, 2009Lahnie JohnsonSound reducing system
US7909136 *Nov 24, 2004Mar 22, 2011Serious Materials, Inc.Soundproof assembly
US7946092Oct 26, 2009May 24, 2011Veerhuis Beheer, B.V.Method of constructing a building, such building, and wall and floor elements for use therein
US8091301 *Dec 2, 2004Jan 10, 2012Unispace A.G.Sound-insulating partition wall and assembly method for such a partition wall
US8191331Nov 14, 2008Jun 5, 2012Little Jr W FrankDemountable paneling system
US8286401Nov 14, 2008Oct 16, 2012Little Jr W FrankDemountable paneling system
US8590262Aug 12, 2010Nov 26, 2013EnergySmart Building Method, LLCEnergy efficient building construction
US8671636 *Jun 11, 2012Mar 18, 2014Walter Kim BrunerStud frame wall system
US20040128944 *Jan 6, 2003Jul 8, 2004Akers Frederick JayeMethods, systems, kits, and fabrications of acoustic-panel-based build-in wall structures providing for variable linear spans
US20050188626 *Feb 8, 2005Sep 1, 2005Lahnie JohnsonSound reducing system
US20050188641 *Dec 2, 2004Sep 1, 2005Unispace A.G.Sound-insulating partition wall and assembly method for such a partition wall
US20050246990 *Apr 9, 2004Nov 10, 2005Geska Edward JInsulated wall system with metal studs and fire retardant walls
US20060000670 *Jul 1, 2004Jan 5, 2006Dodd Murray BPrefabricated sound attenuating wall system
US20060108175 *Nov 24, 2004May 25, 2006Quiet Solution, Inc.Soundproof assembly
US20070101675 *Oct 28, 2005May 10, 2007Veerhuis Beheer, B.V.Method of constructing a building, such building, and wall and floor elements for use therein
US20080236943 *Mar 29, 2007Oct 2, 2008Northern Elastomeric, Inc.Sound proofing system and method
US20090007507 *Jul 6, 2007Jan 8, 2009James ZhaiEnergy efficient assembly building construction using light-gage metal studs and concrete slabs
US20090064621 *Nov 14, 2008Mar 12, 2009Little Jr W FrankDemountable paneling system
US20090084064 *Nov 14, 2008Apr 2, 2009Little Jr W FrankDemountable paneling system
US20090126312 *Nov 20, 2008May 21, 2009Bcm Developments Ltd.Method of building construction
US20090194365 *Mar 24, 2009Aug 6, 2009L.J. Avalon L.L.C. Florida Limited Liability CorporationSound reducing system
US20100088986 *Oct 26, 2009Apr 15, 2010Veerhuis Beheer, B.V.Method of constructing a building, such building, and wall and floor elements for use therein
US20110033693 *Jul 12, 2010Feb 10, 2011Little Jr W FrankTape
US20110056163 *Mar 3, 2009Mar 10, 2011Rockwool International A/SFire protection of a structural element
US20110138702 *Nov 22, 2010Jun 16, 2011Kelley Jay RPre-Engineered/Prefabricated Wall Assembly
US20140059963 *Aug 28, 2013Mar 6, 2014Emercor Ltd.Insulated sheathing and method
US20140137502 *Jan 28, 2014May 22, 2014Fukuvi Usa, Inc.Sealing retention clip
US20150275511 *Nov 25, 2013Oct 1, 2015Akoustos AbDampening assembly
USRE39462 *Feb 5, 2005Jan 9, 2007Brady Todd AVertically slotted header
WO1996005389A1 *Aug 15, 1995Feb 22, 1996B-Level Corp.Auxiliary surface-forming member for construction elements
WO1997030243A1 *Feb 19, 1997Aug 21, 1997Steeler, Inc.Perforated metal stud channel
WO1999064690A1 *Jun 8, 1999Dec 16, 1999Bpb PlcFire-resisting wall
WO2014195723A1 *Jun 6, 2014Dec 11, 2014Retro Eco LimitedNon load-bearing wall design
U.S. Classification52/481.1, 52/145, 52/241, 52/459
International ClassificationE04B2/74, E04B2/72, E04B2/76
Cooperative ClassificationE04B2/723, E04B2/7409, E04B2/76, E04B2/7457
European ClassificationE04B2/76, E04B2/74C5C