Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3307639 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateMar 7, 1967
Filing dateNov 23, 1964
Priority dateNov 23, 1964
Publication numberUS 3307639 A, US 3307639A, US-A-3307639, US3307639 A, US3307639A
InventorsBlenkarn Kenneth A, Wilder Lawrence B
Original AssigneePan American Petroleum Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Valve system for percussion drill motor
US 3307639 A
Abstract  available in
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Mar-c117, 1967 L.'B. WILDER ETAL VALVE SYSTEM FOR PERCUSSION DRILL MOTOR Filed Nov. 23, 1964 a A N 7 Jr j 2 m m 1m ak m w w m m FIG.-1



United States Patent 7 3,307,639 VALVE SYSTEM FOR PERCUSSION DRILL MOTOR Lawrence B. Wilder and Kenneth A. Bleukarn, Tulsa,

Okla., assignors to Pan American Petroleum Corporation, Tulsa, Okla, a corporation of Delaware Filed Nov. 23, 1964, Ser. No. 413,023 2 Claims. (Cl. 173136) This invention relates to a particular valve and seat arrangement, collectively called a valve system, for use in a percussion drilling tool or drilling motor. Such a tool, or motor, is attached to the lower end of a drill string and is actuated by the drilling fluid (gas or liquid) to impart a repetitive or oscillating force to a drill bit in the course of rotary drilling earth formations, thus increasing the penetration rate of the bit. Such equipment, particularly when employing gas as the drilling fluid, have been employed successfully in drilling wells at a much more rapid rate than is possible with conventional drilling apparatus. However, particularly when a liquid is employed as the drilling fluid, the valve systems used to direct the forces inside of the tool are of a critical nature since successful actuation of the tool depends very definitely on the proper seating and unseating of the valve, or valves, in the seats provided. Again, particularly in the case where liquid drilling fluid is employed, but occasionally when gas is used, it is found that there is a distinct tendency of the valve to chatter, that is, rapidly open and close for a short period after initial seating. This results in a considerable decrease in effectiveness of the tool in that it both decreases the magnitude of impact imparted to the drill bit and decreases the number of cycles per unit time, resulting in decreased drilling rate. The valve system used in our invention has been found to overcome this chattering diflieulty and to provide maximum effectiveness of the percussion motor.

The cause of the erratic closing or seating of the valve has on analysis resulted when the pressure surge, which occurs on seating of the valve, is reflected from discontinuities in the tool or associated equipment. Such a phenomenon is frequently referred to as water hammer, though it occurs in a lesser degree in gas actuated systems. It is known that wherever there is a change in acoustic impedance of the fluid column through which the pressure surge is traveling, there is an echo or reflection of the pressure surge which then returns to the original source. The surge is reflected out of phase, which means that there is a decrease in seating pressure applied by the fluid to the valve, tending to dislodge the valve from its seat. Erratic unseating of the valve can also result from shock wave reflections from the drilling string or from the formations being drilled arriving at the valve seat with suflicient vibratory energy to dislodge the valve from its seat. We have found it is possible to design the valve system in such a way that the unseating, or chattering, tendency of the valve on its seat in a percussion drilling tool is minimized and is usually completely absent.

It is accordingly an object of this invention to provide a valve system for a fluid actuated percussion drill motor which minimizes tendencies to unseat the valve due to pressure variations in the actuating fluid on the valve or to vibrations of the seat. Further object of the invention will be apparent from this specification.

In order to illustrate this invention, certain drawings have been attached hereto and made a part hereof. In these drawings the same reference numeral in different views refers to the same or corresponding part.

In the drawings:

, FIGURE 1 shows in diagrammatical form a cross section of one type of drilling motor employing a valve system designed in accordance with this invention.

FIGURE 2 shows in cross section the valve system in an enlarged view.

While it is useful in other mechanisms, our invention particularly finds application in percussion drilling motors, and particularly those actuated by liquid. Such motors have been described a number of times, so no detailed description is believed warranted. Reference is made to co-pending US. application 404,046 filed October 15, 1964 in the names of Renic P. Vincent and Lawrence B. Wilder, and to US. Letters Patent 3,101,796 Stall et al., for examples of liquid and gas actuated percussion drilling motors. 7 Such motors are attached to the end of a string of drill pipe and supplied with a stream of high pressure actuating fluid through the pipe. The motors incorporate an axially oscillating hammer, the movement of which is controlled by one or more valve systems. Below the hammer there is an anvil slideably supported in the lower end of the motor housing and coupled to the housing in such a way that axial torque supplied through the string to the housing is applied to this anvil. The lower end of the anvil protrudes through the housing and is attached to a drill bit. Suitable passages and ports in the motor, including the anvil, permit the actuating fluid ultimately to escape through the hollow anvil and through the bit so that circulation is maintained, suitable hydraulic pressure is applied to the format-ions of the well, and drill cuttings are forced to the surface.

One suitable percussion motor in accordance with the above is shown in FIGURE 1. The connection of the cylindrical housing 11 to a drill string (not shown) is not given. It could be, for example, as shown in the Stall et al..patent mentioned above. The housing 11 has an upper portion which is thick walled and has a relative small internal diameter attached to, or made in integral with, a lower portion of thinner wall and greater internal diameter. At or adjacent the point of diametral change is located one or more ports 12 radially communicating between the inside and outside of the housing. A stepped piston-type hammer 13, the outer upper and lower diam eters of which fit closely, respectively, the upper and lower diameters of housing 11 is slideably mounted Within the housing so that it can oscillate axially. Seals 14 are mounted on either the outer surface of hammer or the inner surface of the housing to provide fluid shut-01f between the hammer and the housing.

A cylindrical center tube 15 substantially coaxial for the majority of its length with housing 11 is attached at its upper end to the housing at a port 16. Thus, the interior of tube 15 communicates With the fluid outside the housing. A valve assembly including a poppet valve 17, a connecting rod 18, and a piston 19 are substantially coaxially mounted within the hammer; piston 19 is within and closely fitting the internal diameter of the center tube 15. This valve assembly is axially symmetric. Center tube 15 also includes one or more ports 20 in the wall, below which there is a fluid seal or partition 21 closely surrounding the connecting rod 18 of the valve assembly and extending from wall to wall of the center tube 15 so that there is substantially no fluid pressure transference from the lower part of center tube 15 into the annular space 22. An annular valve member 23, which is integral with the hammer 13, forms one valve system for this motor, with the aid of the lower end of center tube 15. The minimum inside diameter of this annular member slightly exceeds the outer diameter of center tube 15 and the two are aligned so that when the hammer 13 rises, the flow of fluid from the hollow opening 24 in the upper part of the housing 11 into the annular space 22 is definitely minimized and may be substantially shut off. Below this annular member 23 a second annular member 25 also extends into the annular space 22. The minimum diameter of this annular member (also integral with hammer 13) is less than the inside diameter of center tube 15, and is provided with a seat 34 for the upper surface of poppet valve 17. Preferably a cylindrical recess 26 is provided in hammer 13 below the second annular member 25 of suflicient diameter and length to accommodate the outermost diameter of valve 17 without striking.

The lower surface 27 of poppet valve 17 is beveled inwardly as shown in FIGURES 1 and 2. The region of maximum diameter is axially of short length-for example about /s inch to /2 inch, though this not not critical.

A hollow cylindrical anvil 28 is slideably mounted, as discussed above, in housing 11 below the hammer 13. The hollow portion includes an axial exhaust passageway 29 through which the actuating fluid exhausts. A fluid seal 14a is employed between the anvil 28 and housing 11. The top of the anvil 28 has a coaxial recessed right circular cylindrical portion 30 aligned with valve 17 and of just slightly larger diameter than the maximum diameter of valve 17. This produces an annular step in the top part of the anvil 28. The top of the step is machined to form a seat 31 for the lower surface 27 of valve 17. The axial length of the recessed portion 30 of the exhaust passageway is suflicient so that when the valve 17 is seated on the lower seat 31 the region of maximum valve diameter is within or below the top of the anvil 28. Under this condition, there is an annular chamber 32 below the point of maximum diameter of valve 17 and above the lower seat 31, which has only minimal fluid communication with variable space 33 between the hammer 13 and the anvil 28.

In operation, when the valve 17 of the valve assembly seats on the lower seat 31, the pressure of the drilling fluid in the hollow opening 24 of housing 11 is axially applied substantially equally against the top and bottom areas of the stepped hammer 13. Since the bottom area is the larger, a net upward force causes the hammer 13 to rise within the housing, until the top of the annular valve member 23 is adjacent the bottom of the center tube 15, minimizing fluid flow into space 33. The downward pressure on the top of hammer 13 continues; since the hammer is rising the upward pressure in space 33 on the bottom of the hammer 13 rapidly decreases and the hammer will stop and commence to descend. The minimum diameter of the lower seat 31 of valve 17 is greater than the diameter of the center tube 15. The pressure in space 33 has considerably decreased so the downward seating force (hydraulic pressure in area 33 multiplied by the area corresponding approximately to the largest diameter of seat 31) has correspondingly decreased. The bottom surface of piston 19 is exposed to the fluid pressure in opening 24 in housing 11 through ports 20. The downward force on the top of piston 19, due to the exhaust pressure at the port 16, is considerably less and accordingly there is a net upward force on the valve assembly which rapidly impels this assembly upward until valve 17 seats against the upper seat 34 in the annular member 25. As poppet valve 17 approaches the seat in the second annular member 25, the largest diameter of the valve 17 enters the substantially similar diameter annular chamber 26. The fluid trapped in annular chamber 26 between the poppet valve 17 and the second annular hammer member 25, must therefore be expelled past the seat of said member 25. The annular orifice area rapidly decreases as the valve 17 nears said seat, impeding the fluid flow from annular chamber 26, and thus hydraulically decelerates the motion of the valve 17 and reduces the force of the valve 17 against said seat. Also, if there is not complete shut off between tube and annular member 23, some pressure will be applied against the larger diameter of valve 17 acting as a piston in recess 26, applying a downward force which further decelerates the valve 17. Exhaust passageway 29 is now opened to permit rapid drainage of the fluid in space 33. There is, accordingly, a net downward force on hammer 13 which accelerates the hammer until it impacts against the anvil 28 and transfers a large part of its momentum to the anvil 28 and hence to its attached drill bit. Until the hammer 13 strikes the anvil 28, the net upward force on piston 19 is greater than the downward force on the upper surface of valve 17 above and the upper seat 34 in annular member 25 and, accordingly, the valve assembly is held against the annular seat until the impact of hammer and anvil. The inertia force on the valve assembly at this instant of impact drives it down against the lower seat 31 immediately after the impact. As soon as the upper surface of valve 17 leaves the seat in second annular member 35, the largest diameter of valve 17 (of greater area than the piston 19) is exposed to the pressure in chamber 22; the valve 17 acts as a piston in recess 26, and the valve is also hydraulically expelled toward the anvil seat 31. This further aids in preventing the tool from stalling, if in the start-up cycle the hammer hits a lighter than normal impact.

It is to be noted that the exhaust passageway 29 is kept open until the hammer and anvil impact. This is important. Due to this arrangement there is no liquid cushion in space 33 tending to minimize the sharpness of the blow of the hammer on the anvil. Also, since the deceleration is extremely rapid, the valve assembly by inertia is very rapidly displaced downward against the lower seat 31, tending to give minimum fluid leakage (which decreases hydraulic efliciency) and makes the tool work most effectively. However, a seeming disadvantage of this arrangement is that there is accordingly a tendency of the valve assembly to chatter on seat 31. However, by use of our invention, which involves the beveled lower surface 27 of valve 17, the maximum cylindrical diameter of this valve 17, and the recess 30 prevents or greatly minimizes possibility of such motion.

Particularly referring to FIGURE 2, it is seen that since the outer diameter of valve 17 very nearly matches the inside diameter of cylindrical recess 30 there is very limited fluid access from space 33 to annular chamber 32. If valve 17 temporarily raises from the lower seat 31, annular chamber 32 is in immediate fluid communication with the lower pressure in exhaust passageway 29 and, therefore, relatively there is an increased downward force on the upper face of valve 17 tending to restore it immediately to its seat. On the other hand, the higher fluid pressure in space 33 is applied across the upper face of valve 17, and since there is very limited fluid communication between space 33 and annular chamber 32, there is a marked pressure drop from space 33 to chamber 32 and little tendency of the high pressure fluid in space 33 to lift the valve. Accordingly, the pressure in space 33 has a maximum downward or re-seating effect. In practice, with this arrangement it is found that the clearance between the maximum diameter of valve 17 and the diameter of the annular recessed 30 should be the minimum without physical interference. The effectiveness is of course dependent in some degree to the viscosity of the fluid, greater effective viscosity permitting greater clearance. T o be efiective, the annular orifice area between valve and recess must be substantially less than the inclined orifice area between the seat 31 and the lower bevel of valve 17, which depends on how far up the valve has moved from seat 31. As the valve moves up, the inclined orifice area increases very fast, but the annular orifice between valve and recess becomes shorter in length and thus less effective. In one tool tested, the valve was 2.500" diameter and the recess was 2.505" diameter. When the combined clearance due to wear was .025", the pocket was noticeably less effective. With minimum clearance, there is virtually no tendency of the valve 17 to chatter on the lower seat 31, even in the presence of water hammer, and the percussion drill motor works with maximum effectiveness.

We have tried a number of designs for the shape of the lower surface of valve 17 and the recess 30 and lower seat 31. The design shown has proved to be better than any other arrangement given and, vin fact, is the one design that has permitted this type of percussion motor to Work for many hours uninterruptedly and without breakage of the valve 17. It is to be noted that not only is the radially outer portion of the poppet valve beveled inwardly, but the center part of the lower valve surface is concave upward. This eliminates mass from the center part of the valve where it is of little benefit as far as strength is concerned and, accordingly, this arrangement gives the popet valve a greater stifi'ness for the total weight than would be possible if this concavity were missing.

It must be kept in mind that if a liquid is the actuating fluid, it is carrying small particles of solids, for example, parts of the drill cuttings and hence tends to produce definite erosional effects when valves are in the process of closing. These erosional effects are minimized if the valve closure is very rapid with deceleration or damping effect only at the last instant. This also is found in the design according to our invention, as discussed immediately above. Accordingly, we have found minimal erosional effects on the valve in the design shown.

The valve assembly is maintained coaxial with the lower seat 31 but there is no restriction to rotational movement of this valve as it oscillates back and forth. Accordingly, the valve 17 will not ordinarily re-seat in the same position relative to the lower seat 31, stroke after stroke. This, therefore, causes the lower beveled surface 27 of the valve and the corresponding lower seat 31, to be maintained in a uniform good seating relationship over a tremendous number of cycles of valve oscillation. Accordingly, we find that the valve system consisting of valve 17, recess 30, and lower seat 31, are maintained in good mechanical closure relationships over the life of the percussion drill motor.

It is apparent that variations in the arrangement of our invention may be made without departing from the principle disclosed in this specification. Accordingly, the design is best defined by the attached claims.

We claim:

1. In a percussion drill motor including a housing, an axially hollow hammer slideably disposed within and closely fitting said housing, an axially hollow anvil slideably disposed within and closely fitting said housing adjacent one end of said hammer, said hammer being reciprocated by valve action on a stream of pressure fluid flowing in the axial hollow portions of said hammer and said anvil, the improvement comprising:

(1) an axially symmetric poppet valve coaxially and slideably mounted within said housing adjacent said anvil with an axially short section of maximum diameter and a lower beveled face extending inwardly from said section of maximum diameter,

(2) a recessed valve seat in the hollow portion of said anvil adjacent said hammer, said valve seat being beveled to correspond to said lower beveled face of said valve and axially aligned therewith, said seat being located below the top of said anvil by a substantial axial distance such that when said valve touches said seat said short section is below the top of said anvil, the recess above said seat being substantially a right circular cylinder the diameter of which is of only slightly greater diameter than the maximum diameter of said valve, and

(3) a recessed valve seat in the hollow portion of said hammer adjacent said anvil, said valve seat being beveled to correspond to the upper surface of said valve and axially aligned therewith, said seat being located above the bottom of said hammer by a substantial axial distance, the recess below said seat in said hammer being substantially a right circular cylinder the diameter of which is of only slightly greater diameter than the maximum diameter of said valve.

2. Apparatus in accordance with claim 1 in which the lower beveled face of said poppet valve extends inwardly only a portion of the total valve width and the remainder of the lower surface of said valve is concave upward.

References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,665,046 4/1928 Tucker 173-l37 2,431,769 12/ 1947 Parker 1375 14 2,774,334 12/ 1956 Cline 173136 2,804,825 9/1957 Mansfield et a1 137-514 3,167,136 1/1965 Cook l73136 References Cited by the Applicant UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,108,947 2/ 1938 Seifer. 2,325,264 7/ 1943 Merten. 2,388,741 11/1945 Hays. 2,422,031 6/ 1947 Merten. 2,943,603 7/ 1960 Bassinger. 2,979,033 4/ 1961 Bassinger.

FRED C. MATTERN, JR., Primary Examiner, L. P. KESSLER, Assistant Examiner.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1665046 *Oct 29, 1924Apr 3, 1928Tucker Ralph HPneumatic hammer
US2108947 *Nov 26, 1935Feb 22, 1938Theo SeiferHydraulic motor for deep-boring mechanisms
US2325264 *Sep 27, 1940Jul 27, 1943Shell DevHydraulic drilling device
US2388741 *Apr 29, 1944Nov 13, 1945Hays Russell RHydraulic drilling device
US2422031 *Jun 19, 1944Jun 10, 1947Shell DevHydraulic well drilling device
US2431769 *Apr 30, 1943Dec 2, 1947Parker Appliance CoQuick opening check valve assembly
US2774334 *May 1, 1953Dec 18, 1956Hughes Tool CoReciprocating prime mover
US2804825 *Nov 13, 1951Sep 3, 1957British Internal Comb Engine RDelivery valves for fuel injection pumps
US2943603 *Sep 16, 1954Jul 5, 1960Bassinger Tool CompanyFluid actuated impact tool
US2979033 *Dec 31, 1958Apr 11, 1961Bassinger Tool CompanyFluid actuated impact tool
US3167136 *Dec 31, 1959Jan 26, 1965Socony Mobil Oil Co IncFluid-actuated drilling tool
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4333492 *Dec 10, 1979Jun 8, 1982West Joe ELiquid inertia tool
US4798125 *Nov 3, 1987Jan 17, 1989Chang Fung MPneumatic type of hydraulic structure
US5396965 *Jan 23, 1989Mar 14, 1995NovatekDown-hole mud actuated hammer
US6454025Mar 3, 2000Sep 24, 2002Vermeer Manufacturing CompanyApparatus for directional boring under mixed conditions
US6588516Jul 8, 2002Jul 8, 2003Vermeer Manufacturing CompanyMethod and apparatus for directional boring under mixed conditions
US8196677Aug 4, 2009Jun 12, 2012Pioneer One, Inc.Horizontal drilling system
US8746370Jun 11, 2012Jun 10, 2014Pioneer One, Inc.Horizontal drilling system
USRE44427Jan 20, 2012Aug 13, 2013Vermeer Manufacturing CompanyApparatus for directional boring under mixed conditions
EP0209373A2 *Jul 16, 1986Jan 21, 1987John Macdonald & Company (Pneumatic Tools) LimitedAir tool with double acting valve
U.S. Classification173/136, 91/49, 173/128, 91/50
International ClassificationE21B4/00, E21B4/14
Cooperative ClassificationE21B4/14
European ClassificationE21B4/14